The document is a survey from the pro-gun organization Gun Owners of America sent to congressional candidate Shak Hill. It contains 19 questions regarding Hill's positions on various gun control and gun rights issues. Hill indicates support for gun rights by answering "Yes" to opposing assault weapons bans, gun-free school zones, restrictions on private firearm sales and large capacity magazines. Hill also expresses opposition to gun control measures like universal background checks, microstamping bullets, and trigger lock requirements.
A fictitious memo at Weft and Wright, P.L.L.C. that predicts the outcome of Capt. Bryant’s plan to have the police detain any captured bail jumper so that Capt. Bryant’s runners can assume custody and prevent loss of the bail bond money.
Section 1983 Litigation by Karen Blum - 136 pagesUmesh Heendeniya
This chapter discusses the "under color of law" element of a Section 1983 claim. It explains that this element is typically met when government employees are performing their official duties. However, when private actors are involved, courts examine whether there was joint action between public and private parties, an intertwined relationship, state encouragement of the private conduct, or a public function was performed. The chapter provides that when suing a government entity, such as a city or county, the "under color of law" requirement is met because the entity was created by state law. Government employees generally act "under color of law" when performing their job duties, even if contrary to state law or when exercising professional discretion.
Making false statements to federal officials is prohibited by federal law. The law aims to prevent people from lying or withholding information from federal agencies and departments in order to undermine their functions. It prohibits knowingly making false, fictitious, or fraudulent statements in matters under federal jurisdiction. While the Fifth Amendment allows people to avoid self-incrimination, it does not allow lying. The law has evolved from the original False Claims Act of 1863, with updates in 1918, 1934, and 1948 to its current form.
Estate Planning and Estate Administration Issues Posed by FirearmsRobin L. Miskell
Be armed with information! Many estate planners are unaware that their clients own firearms. Firearms present special issues for planning purposes depending on the firearm and your state of residence. Please see the attached PowerPoint for an idea of when these issues might be presented either in an estate administration or estate planning context. This particular presentation is geared towards residents of Tennessee.
The document provides a summary of the Supreme Court of Canada case Canada (Prime Minister) v. Khadr (2010). It discusses Omar Khadr, a Canadian citizen who was detained at Guantanamo Bay prison and subjected to torture. The Supreme Court ruled Khadr's charter rights were violated but did not request a specific remedy from the government. The document argues this was a failure by the courts. It provides background on charter rights in Canada and examines past cases involving crown prerogative powers. The document aims to show the Supreme Court should have established a clear remedy and review process for the government to follow.
This document discusses the ongoing debate around gun control and the 2nd Amendment. It provides historical context on the formation of state militias and debates whether the right to bear arms applies only to militia members or individuals. The document outlines key Supreme Court cases that have shifted interpretation from a states' rights view to recognizing an individual right to gun ownership. It also discusses variations in state and local laws and efforts to regulate firearms at the federal level. Competing perspectives in the current gun control debate are presented along with the possibility for compromise.
The document discusses the history of gun control in the United States from the 19th century to modern day. It outlines key events like the establishment of the NRA in 1871, passage of the National Firearms Act in 1934 to regulate automatic weapons, and more recent laws like the Brady Bill in 1994 which imposed background checks and waiting periods for handgun purchases. The document also discusses the ongoing debate around gun rights and those who believe firearms should have fewer controls versus those advocating for stricter regulations to reduce gun violence.
A fictitious memo at Weft and Wright, P.L.L.C. that predicts the outcome of Capt. Bryant’s plan to have the police detain any captured bail jumper so that Capt. Bryant’s runners can assume custody and prevent loss of the bail bond money.
Section 1983 Litigation by Karen Blum - 136 pagesUmesh Heendeniya
This chapter discusses the "under color of law" element of a Section 1983 claim. It explains that this element is typically met when government employees are performing their official duties. However, when private actors are involved, courts examine whether there was joint action between public and private parties, an intertwined relationship, state encouragement of the private conduct, or a public function was performed. The chapter provides that when suing a government entity, such as a city or county, the "under color of law" requirement is met because the entity was created by state law. Government employees generally act "under color of law" when performing their job duties, even if contrary to state law or when exercising professional discretion.
Making false statements to federal officials is prohibited by federal law. The law aims to prevent people from lying or withholding information from federal agencies and departments in order to undermine their functions. It prohibits knowingly making false, fictitious, or fraudulent statements in matters under federal jurisdiction. While the Fifth Amendment allows people to avoid self-incrimination, it does not allow lying. The law has evolved from the original False Claims Act of 1863, with updates in 1918, 1934, and 1948 to its current form.
Estate Planning and Estate Administration Issues Posed by FirearmsRobin L. Miskell
Be armed with information! Many estate planners are unaware that their clients own firearms. Firearms present special issues for planning purposes depending on the firearm and your state of residence. Please see the attached PowerPoint for an idea of when these issues might be presented either in an estate administration or estate planning context. This particular presentation is geared towards residents of Tennessee.
The document provides a summary of the Supreme Court of Canada case Canada (Prime Minister) v. Khadr (2010). It discusses Omar Khadr, a Canadian citizen who was detained at Guantanamo Bay prison and subjected to torture. The Supreme Court ruled Khadr's charter rights were violated but did not request a specific remedy from the government. The document argues this was a failure by the courts. It provides background on charter rights in Canada and examines past cases involving crown prerogative powers. The document aims to show the Supreme Court should have established a clear remedy and review process for the government to follow.
This document discusses the ongoing debate around gun control and the 2nd Amendment. It provides historical context on the formation of state militias and debates whether the right to bear arms applies only to militia members or individuals. The document outlines key Supreme Court cases that have shifted interpretation from a states' rights view to recognizing an individual right to gun ownership. It also discusses variations in state and local laws and efforts to regulate firearms at the federal level. Competing perspectives in the current gun control debate are presented along with the possibility for compromise.
The document discusses the history of gun control in the United States from the 19th century to modern day. It outlines key events like the establishment of the NRA in 1871, passage of the National Firearms Act in 1934 to regulate automatic weapons, and more recent laws like the Brady Bill in 1994 which imposed background checks and waiting periods for handgun purchases. The document also discusses the ongoing debate around gun rights and those who believe firearms should have fewer controls versus those advocating for stricter regulations to reduce gun violence.
The document summarizes gun laws in New England states. It begins with an overview of the 2012 Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting and the renewed debate around gun control. It then reviews federal gun laws and key Supreme Court rulings affirming individual gun rights. The summary reviews gun laws and requirements for permits and licenses to purchase or carry firearms in each New England state, finding the most restrictive laws in Massachusetts and the least in Vermont. It concludes that the debate around balancing Second Amendment rights with public safety will continue both nationwide and within each state.
President Obama signed legislation repealing the "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" policy, which banned openly gay individuals from serving in the military. The 17-year policy resulted in the discharge of over 14,000 troops. While the Army and Marines opposed repeal, a Pentagon study found allowing gay troops to serve openly would not impact the military's effectiveness. Repeal will be formally enacted within 60 days pending certification it will not harm military cohesion or readiness.
United States vs. Herbert Guest (Highlighted)VogelDenise
This document summarizes a 1966 Supreme Court case, United States v. Herbert Guest, et al. regarding a prosecution for an alleged conspiracy against the rights of citizens. The Supreme Court held that it did not have jurisdiction to review the dismissal of one part of the indictment that charged conspiracy to deprive rights secured by the Civil Rights Act of 1964. However, it did have jurisdiction over other parts of the indictment. It found that another part sufficiently alleged state involvement in depriving rights. It also found that a part charging conspiracy to deprive the right to travel charged an offense under the federal statute regarding conspiracy against citizens' rights, as the right to travel between states is constitutionally protected. The Court reversed the dismissal and remanded the case
Professor Afsheen John Radsan reviews, in the context of various memoranda from the Justice Department’s Office of Legal Counsel, the differences between a lawyer’s duty of zealous advocacy (ABA Model Rule 3.1) and the duty of candor in legal advice (ABA Model Rule 2.1).
Crmj 410 Enthusiastic Study / snaptutorial.comStephenson53
C H A P T E R 3 Constitutional Limitations on the Prohibition of Criminal Conduct
1. Can you think of an example of an ex post facto law?
3. Can a municipality enforce an ordinance totally banning religious organizations from canvassing neighborhoods in search of new members? What about an ordinance that prohibits such canvassing between the
Hong Kong Bank Accounts And Hong Kong CorporationsPanamaLaw
We have now made it possible to open up corporate bank accounts in Honk Kong without a need to visit Hong Kong (no personal accounts please). Hong Kong today is one of the best private offshore tax havens in the world.
http://www.panamalaw.org/hong_kong_bank_accounts_and_hong_kong_corporations.html
The document summarizes key aspects of the U.S. Supreme Court, including its role as the final authority on constitutional interpretation, the process by which cases are accepted for review, and some notable past and recent cases. It also discusses the composition and selection of justices, differences between liberal and conservative judicial philosophies, and the Court's general procedures and opinion writing process.
Constitutional Law Your Ironclad Guarantee of FreedomChuck Thompson
This document discusses various aspects of constitutional law, including:
- The supremacy of the U.S. Constitution over other laws according to Article VI of the Constitution.
- Protections provided by the Bill of Rights, such as freedom of speech and protection from unreasonable searches.
- The principle that unconstitutional statutes are void and unenforceable from the date of enactment based on the 1803 Marbury v. Madison Supreme Court decision.
- Citations from American Jurisprudence discussing the interpretation and application of the Constitution, including the principle that citizens are not bound to obey unconstitutional laws.
This document outlines several Supreme Court cases from 1803 to 1827 that expanded the powers of the federal government and diminished those of the states. These cases established principles like judicial review, the supremacy of federal law over state law, implied congressional powers, and that states must submit to federal jurisdiction in certain cases. The cases gave the national government more control over issues like interstate commerce and the militia. Overall, the rulings centralized more power in the federal government and asserted its primacy over the states.
The Constitution is an Enforceable Contractable1appeal
The US Constitution is a contract between the governement and the US Citizen enforceable by a court of law.
See the Constitution here: http://www.constitution.org/constit_.htm
The document provides an agenda and notes for a class on the US Constitution. It includes:
1) An introduction to the Constitution including why it is structured the way it is and key principles like federalism and separation of powers.
2) Details on the 3 branches of government and their powers as outlined in the Constitution.
3) Information on constitutional amendments including the process for amending and some that were proposed but failed.
4) Class activities like a debate on the Equal Rights Amendment and a scavenger hunt to find details in the Constitution.
The document discusses various topics related to civil liberties and civil rights in the United States, including: key terms; the differences between civil liberties and civil rights; the incorporation of the Bill of Rights to apply to states; landmark Supreme Court cases related to freedoms of speech, press, religion and other rights; the development of civil rights for women and African Americans; and contemporary issues like affirmative action and rights for other groups.
Chapter 13 - The Remaining Amendments and a Return to the Constitutionlisajurs
The chapter discusses the remaining amendments in the Bill of Rights (3rd, 7th, 9th, 10th) and their impacts. It also covers other amendments related to governmental structure, elections, civil rights and liberties. Key points include how the 3rd Amendment places limits on quartering soldiers, the 7th guarantees jury trials in civil cases, and the 10th embodies the concept of federalism and reserved powers of states.
Ch 5 presentation Will Kumi, Rebecca Mendelsohn, Conrad Blackrebeccamendelsohn
The document summarizes key aspects of civil liberties and the Bill of Rights in the United States. It discusses how the Bill of Rights was drafted to limit federal government overreach on individual liberties. It then examines how the 14th Amendment and the incorporation doctrine applied these protections to state laws over time through Supreme Court rulings. Specific rights covered include freedom of religion, speech, press, and assembly. The establishment and free exercise of religion clauses are explained. Tests for determining protected speech like clear and present danger are also summarized.
In 1798, in response to political opposition from Thomas Jefferson and the Democratic-Republicans, the Federalist-controlled Congress passed the Alien and Sedition Acts to strengthen the federal government and quell dissent. The Acts allowed for harsher treatment of immigrants, deportation of non-citizens, and fines or jail time for those who expressed opinions damaging to the government. In response, the Virginia and Kentucky Resolutions asserted states' rights to declare unconstitutional federal laws void, raising questions about federalism and the balance of state and federal power that remain familiar themes in American history.
This document provides notes and assignments for a government team on topics related to due process and equal protection under the law. It includes:
- Notes on procedural due process, substantive due process, and the incorporation of protections from the Bill of Rights to the states via the 14th Amendment.
- Assignments analyzing landmark Supreme Court cases that developed these legal concepts, such as Lochner v. New York, Gitlow v. New York, and Roe v. Wade.
- Notes on the equal protection clause and the three levels of scrutiny used to analyze unequal treatment.
- Assignments analyzing equal protection cases like Korematsu v. US and US v. Virginia.
- An assignment to prepare oral
The document summarizes the history and key provisions of the Voting Rights Act of 1965. It discusses how the Act was passed to combat racial discrimination in voting, particularly in southern states. It outlines the key sections of the Act, including Section 4(b) that defined jurisdictions subject to preclearance of voting changes (Section 5). It discusses two Supreme Court cases, Katzenbach and Northwest Austin, that upheld the Act. Finally, it provides context for the Shelby County v. Holder case that struck down Section 4(b).
1) The document provides instructions for an activity involving separating the current date from yesterday and reflecting on experiences. It includes prompts for writing about highs and lows, understanding of a topic, and responses to a video clip.
2) The second part involves a focusing exercise and sharing with a partner.
3) The last section provides a team quiz on constitutional topics to prepare for, with instructions for individual written responses during the quiz.
Shak Hill - National Association for Gun Rights Larry Ward
The candidate answered "yes" to supporting individual Second Amendment rights, opposing new restrictions on firearms and magazines, restoring rights to veterans denied due process, and opposing expanded background checks and "gun-free zones." The candidate also answered "yes" to repealing the Lautenberg ban and opposing legislation expanding the definition of "gun trafficking" and the authority of the BATFE. By signing the pledge, the candidate agreed to introduce pro-gun legislation annually and only endorse pro-gun candidates.
2009-10 Our National Struggle for Health Care Reform in AmericaAccess HealthColumbus
This document discusses the struggle for health care reform in America by comparing the health care system to the education system. It notes that access to education is considered a right, universal, and portable, unlike health care. The document outlines issues with the current health care system such as rising costs, lack of universal coverage, and poor health outcomes compared to other countries. It also discusses eight major tension points in achieving national health care reform, such as requiring insurance coverage for all, subsidies for low-income individuals, transitioning payment models to value-based care, and the possibility of a public insurance option.
The document summarizes gun laws in New England states. It begins with an overview of the 2012 Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting and the renewed debate around gun control. It then reviews federal gun laws and key Supreme Court rulings affirming individual gun rights. The summary reviews gun laws and requirements for permits and licenses to purchase or carry firearms in each New England state, finding the most restrictive laws in Massachusetts and the least in Vermont. It concludes that the debate around balancing Second Amendment rights with public safety will continue both nationwide and within each state.
President Obama signed legislation repealing the "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" policy, which banned openly gay individuals from serving in the military. The 17-year policy resulted in the discharge of over 14,000 troops. While the Army and Marines opposed repeal, a Pentagon study found allowing gay troops to serve openly would not impact the military's effectiveness. Repeal will be formally enacted within 60 days pending certification it will not harm military cohesion or readiness.
United States vs. Herbert Guest (Highlighted)VogelDenise
This document summarizes a 1966 Supreme Court case, United States v. Herbert Guest, et al. regarding a prosecution for an alleged conspiracy against the rights of citizens. The Supreme Court held that it did not have jurisdiction to review the dismissal of one part of the indictment that charged conspiracy to deprive rights secured by the Civil Rights Act of 1964. However, it did have jurisdiction over other parts of the indictment. It found that another part sufficiently alleged state involvement in depriving rights. It also found that a part charging conspiracy to deprive the right to travel charged an offense under the federal statute regarding conspiracy against citizens' rights, as the right to travel between states is constitutionally protected. The Court reversed the dismissal and remanded the case
Professor Afsheen John Radsan reviews, in the context of various memoranda from the Justice Department’s Office of Legal Counsel, the differences between a lawyer’s duty of zealous advocacy (ABA Model Rule 3.1) and the duty of candor in legal advice (ABA Model Rule 2.1).
Crmj 410 Enthusiastic Study / snaptutorial.comStephenson53
C H A P T E R 3 Constitutional Limitations on the Prohibition of Criminal Conduct
1. Can you think of an example of an ex post facto law?
3. Can a municipality enforce an ordinance totally banning religious organizations from canvassing neighborhoods in search of new members? What about an ordinance that prohibits such canvassing between the
Hong Kong Bank Accounts And Hong Kong CorporationsPanamaLaw
We have now made it possible to open up corporate bank accounts in Honk Kong without a need to visit Hong Kong (no personal accounts please). Hong Kong today is one of the best private offshore tax havens in the world.
http://www.panamalaw.org/hong_kong_bank_accounts_and_hong_kong_corporations.html
The document summarizes key aspects of the U.S. Supreme Court, including its role as the final authority on constitutional interpretation, the process by which cases are accepted for review, and some notable past and recent cases. It also discusses the composition and selection of justices, differences between liberal and conservative judicial philosophies, and the Court's general procedures and opinion writing process.
Constitutional Law Your Ironclad Guarantee of FreedomChuck Thompson
This document discusses various aspects of constitutional law, including:
- The supremacy of the U.S. Constitution over other laws according to Article VI of the Constitution.
- Protections provided by the Bill of Rights, such as freedom of speech and protection from unreasonable searches.
- The principle that unconstitutional statutes are void and unenforceable from the date of enactment based on the 1803 Marbury v. Madison Supreme Court decision.
- Citations from American Jurisprudence discussing the interpretation and application of the Constitution, including the principle that citizens are not bound to obey unconstitutional laws.
This document outlines several Supreme Court cases from 1803 to 1827 that expanded the powers of the federal government and diminished those of the states. These cases established principles like judicial review, the supremacy of federal law over state law, implied congressional powers, and that states must submit to federal jurisdiction in certain cases. The cases gave the national government more control over issues like interstate commerce and the militia. Overall, the rulings centralized more power in the federal government and asserted its primacy over the states.
The Constitution is an Enforceable Contractable1appeal
The US Constitution is a contract between the governement and the US Citizen enforceable by a court of law.
See the Constitution here: http://www.constitution.org/constit_.htm
The document provides an agenda and notes for a class on the US Constitution. It includes:
1) An introduction to the Constitution including why it is structured the way it is and key principles like federalism and separation of powers.
2) Details on the 3 branches of government and their powers as outlined in the Constitution.
3) Information on constitutional amendments including the process for amending and some that were proposed but failed.
4) Class activities like a debate on the Equal Rights Amendment and a scavenger hunt to find details in the Constitution.
The document discusses various topics related to civil liberties and civil rights in the United States, including: key terms; the differences between civil liberties and civil rights; the incorporation of the Bill of Rights to apply to states; landmark Supreme Court cases related to freedoms of speech, press, religion and other rights; the development of civil rights for women and African Americans; and contemporary issues like affirmative action and rights for other groups.
Chapter 13 - The Remaining Amendments and a Return to the Constitutionlisajurs
The chapter discusses the remaining amendments in the Bill of Rights (3rd, 7th, 9th, 10th) and their impacts. It also covers other amendments related to governmental structure, elections, civil rights and liberties. Key points include how the 3rd Amendment places limits on quartering soldiers, the 7th guarantees jury trials in civil cases, and the 10th embodies the concept of federalism and reserved powers of states.
Ch 5 presentation Will Kumi, Rebecca Mendelsohn, Conrad Blackrebeccamendelsohn
The document summarizes key aspects of civil liberties and the Bill of Rights in the United States. It discusses how the Bill of Rights was drafted to limit federal government overreach on individual liberties. It then examines how the 14th Amendment and the incorporation doctrine applied these protections to state laws over time through Supreme Court rulings. Specific rights covered include freedom of religion, speech, press, and assembly. The establishment and free exercise of religion clauses are explained. Tests for determining protected speech like clear and present danger are also summarized.
In 1798, in response to political opposition from Thomas Jefferson and the Democratic-Republicans, the Federalist-controlled Congress passed the Alien and Sedition Acts to strengthen the federal government and quell dissent. The Acts allowed for harsher treatment of immigrants, deportation of non-citizens, and fines or jail time for those who expressed opinions damaging to the government. In response, the Virginia and Kentucky Resolutions asserted states' rights to declare unconstitutional federal laws void, raising questions about federalism and the balance of state and federal power that remain familiar themes in American history.
This document provides notes and assignments for a government team on topics related to due process and equal protection under the law. It includes:
- Notes on procedural due process, substantive due process, and the incorporation of protections from the Bill of Rights to the states via the 14th Amendment.
- Assignments analyzing landmark Supreme Court cases that developed these legal concepts, such as Lochner v. New York, Gitlow v. New York, and Roe v. Wade.
- Notes on the equal protection clause and the three levels of scrutiny used to analyze unequal treatment.
- Assignments analyzing equal protection cases like Korematsu v. US and US v. Virginia.
- An assignment to prepare oral
The document summarizes the history and key provisions of the Voting Rights Act of 1965. It discusses how the Act was passed to combat racial discrimination in voting, particularly in southern states. It outlines the key sections of the Act, including Section 4(b) that defined jurisdictions subject to preclearance of voting changes (Section 5). It discusses two Supreme Court cases, Katzenbach and Northwest Austin, that upheld the Act. Finally, it provides context for the Shelby County v. Holder case that struck down Section 4(b).
1) The document provides instructions for an activity involving separating the current date from yesterday and reflecting on experiences. It includes prompts for writing about highs and lows, understanding of a topic, and responses to a video clip.
2) The second part involves a focusing exercise and sharing with a partner.
3) The last section provides a team quiz on constitutional topics to prepare for, with instructions for individual written responses during the quiz.
Shak Hill - National Association for Gun Rights Larry Ward
The candidate answered "yes" to supporting individual Second Amendment rights, opposing new restrictions on firearms and magazines, restoring rights to veterans denied due process, and opposing expanded background checks and "gun-free zones." The candidate also answered "yes" to repealing the Lautenberg ban and opposing legislation expanding the definition of "gun trafficking" and the authority of the BATFE. By signing the pledge, the candidate agreed to introduce pro-gun legislation annually and only endorse pro-gun candidates.
2009-10 Our National Struggle for Health Care Reform in AmericaAccess HealthColumbus
This document discusses the struggle for health care reform in America by comparing the health care system to the education system. It notes that access to education is considered a right, universal, and portable, unlike health care. The document outlines issues with the current health care system such as rising costs, lack of universal coverage, and poor health outcomes compared to other countries. It also discusses eight major tension points in achieving national health care reform, such as requiring insurance coverage for all, subsidies for low-income individuals, transitioning payment models to value-based care, and the possibility of a public insurance option.
This 3-slide PowerPoint provides an overview of the Moodle Academy for the 2009-2010 year. Each slide contains a bullet point summarizing a topic, with the first slide introducing the Academy, the second likely focusing on a specific course or topic, and the third concluding or looking ahead to next steps.
23 tips for marketing graduates presented 10/22/2010. Tips gathered from LinkedIn participants answering the question: "What would you tell a marketing grad?"
The document summarizes the key points of debate around gun control legislation. It discusses the sociological, ethical, and legal dimensions being debated, including the effectiveness of gun laws and interpretation of Second Amendment rights. Supporters argue stricter laws could reduce gun violence based on statistics from other countries with strict laws and background checks could respect gun rights. Opponents counter that statistics don't prove regulation reduces crime and that additional laws could infringe on constitutional rights. Alternative policies proposed include assault weapons bans and background checks. The implications for families and society are also debated.
This document summarizes the history of gun control laws in the United States from the 19th century to present day. It discusses early state regulations and key federal laws such as the National Firearms Act of 1934, Gun Control Act of 1968, and Brady Handgun Violence Prevention Act of 1993. The author predicts that loopholes in current laws, like the "gun show loophole," will be closed by 2013 but that the gun control debate will continue for decades.
The document summarizes the key points made in three articles about gun control. It discusses the underlying issues debated in the articles, such as interpretations of the Second Amendment and the business interests of lobbyists. Advantages of stricter gun control mentioned include potential reductions in gun crimes, accidents, and strain on the economy. Disadvantages from opposition include possible infringements on constitutional rights and burdens on gun manufacturers. Alternative policies proposed include assault weapons bans, background check regulations, and restrictions on inter-state gun purchases. The debate implications for families are that most live responsibly with guns while some families do not.
The document summarizes various criminal offenses related to public order, safety, and security. It discusses common law and statutory definitions of unlawful assembly, riot, and disorderly conduct. It also covers offenses such as vagrancy, loitering, curfews, panhandling, traffic violations, weapons possession, immigration violations, and crimes against national security like treason, sabotage, espionage, sedition, terrorism and weapons of mass destruction. Key Supreme Court cases addressing some of these issues are also summarized.
Now Is the Time: The President’s Plan - Fact SheetMargolis Healy
The document outlines the President's plan to reduce gun violence in the United States through four steps: 1) closing background check loopholes to prevent dangerous individuals from obtaining guns; 2) banning assault weapons and high-capacity magazines; 3) making schools safer; and 4) increasing access to mental health services. It provides details on strengthening background checks and banning specific weapons and magazines to curb mass shootings and protect communities. The plan aims to balance Second Amendment rights with preventing violence through common-sense measures.
The document discusses arguments for and against gun control in the United States. The author argues that gun control is not practical and that efforts should focus on reducing the root causes of crime instead. The document provides an overview of gun laws in different states and discusses the challenges of passing federal gun control legislation.
The document discusses the history and ongoing debate around the interpretation of the Second Amendment. It covers the original intent of the amendment in relation to state militias, as well as key Supreme Court cases that have shifted interpretation towards recognizing an individual right to gun ownership. The debate centers around whether the amendment protects gun ownership only in the context of service in a militia, or as an individual right.
The document discusses gun control in Michigan and argues against further restrictions. It asserts that gun control violates Second Amendment rights and that law-abiding citizens should be able to own guns for hunting, protection, and to prevent government overreach as the founding fathers intended. While some regulation is needed, more restrictions will not stop criminals from getting guns and will only limit the rights of lawful citizens to own firearms. The document provides historical context regarding the intentions of the Second Amendment and debates around gun control policies in Michigan.
04062024_First India Newspaper Jaipur.pdfFIRST INDIA
Find Latest India News and Breaking News these days from India on Politics, Business, Entertainment, Technology, Sports, Lifestyle and Coronavirus News in India and the world over that you can't miss. For real time update Visit our social media handle. Read First India NewsPaper in your morning replace. Visit First India.
CLICK:- https://firstindia.co.in/
#First_India_NewsPaper
‘वोटर्स विल मस्ट प्रीवेल’ (मतदाताओं को जीतना होगा) अभियान द्वारा जारी हेल्पलाइन नंबर, 4 जून को सुबह 7 बजे से दोपहर 12 बजे तक मतगणना प्रक्रिया में कहीं भी किसी भी तरह के उल्लंघन की रिपोर्ट करने के लिए खुला रहेगा।
An astonishing, first-of-its-kind, report by the NYT assessing damage in Ukraine. Even if the war ends tomorrow, in many places there will be nothing to go back to.
El Puerto de Algeciras continúa un año más como el más eficiente del continente europeo y vuelve a situarse en el “top ten” mundial, según el informe The Container Port Performance Index 2023 (CPPI), elaborado por el Banco Mundial y la consultora S&P Global.
El informe CPPI utiliza dos enfoques metodológicos diferentes para calcular la clasificación del índice: uno administrativo o técnico y otro estadístico, basado en análisis factorial (FA). Según los autores, esta dualidad pretende asegurar una clasificación que refleje con precisión el rendimiento real del puerto, a la vez que sea estadísticamente sólida. En esta edición del informe CPPI 2023, se han empleado los mismos enfoques metodológicos y se ha aplicado un método de agregación de clasificaciones para combinar los resultados de ambos enfoques y obtener una clasificación agregada.
Here is Gabe Whitley's response to my defamation lawsuit for him calling me a rapist and perjurer in court documents.
You have to read it to believe it, but after you read it, you won't believe it. And I included eight examples of defamatory statements/
Acolyte Episodes review (TV series) The Acolyte. Learn about the influence of the program on the Star Wars world, as well as new characters and story twists.
1. Gun Owners of America
8001 Forbes Place, Suite 102
Springfield, VA 22151
2014 CONGRESSIONAL CANDIDATE SURVEY
Name_Shak Hill ___________________________ Phone:_703-425-2554_______
Address__PO Box 486___________________________
City/State/zip________Centreville, VA 20122_________ Email:__shak@shakhill.com_
Campaign Contact:__contact me for all survey related issues Office: _703-425-2554
Party Affiliation: _Republican_______ District:_Virginia_____
Elected office held before (if applicable): _West Melbourne, FL City Council______
*******************************************************************************
Please fill out, sign, and return as soon as possible. You may fax to (703) 321-8408. Or email
to: goasurveys@gmail.com
________________________________________________________________________________
1. Gun control advocates label semi-automatic firearms with certain cosmetic features as so-called
“assault weapons.” However, all semi-automatic firearms are functionally the same (one round
fired per one pull of the trigger.)
Would you oppose any legislation that reinstates the 1994 law, which sunset in 2004, that
banned many types of semi-automatic firearms (commonly referred to as “assault weapons”)?
Yes __X___ No _____
2. The Supreme Court ruled in Heller (2008) that: “The Second Amendment guarantees an
individual’s right to possess a firearm unconnected with service in a militia,” and that the District of
Columbia’s ban on operable firearms in the home violated that right. Nevertheless, D.C. officials
have subsequently passed a law that is nearly as restrictive as the old one, and it now includes a
“microstamping” provision that could impact gun owners nationwide.
Do you support legislation to repeal the District of Columbia’s gun laws?
Yes __X__ No ____ If no, please explain: _________________________________
3. Legislation in Congress seeks to ban private firearm sales at gun shows unless the buyer submits
to a federal background check. Most recently, the Senate unsuccessfully tried to pass the Toomey-
Manchin gun control bill which would have enforced this specific form of gun control.
2. )
Would you oppose legislation (such as Toomey-Manchin) that would require private buyers
and sellers of firearms at a gun show to get the federal government’s approval before
completing the transaction?
Yes _X___ No ____
4. The federal gun free school zones act of 1996 makes it illegal (with limited exceptions) to
possess a firearm within 1,000 feet of the property of any “public, private or parochial school.”
Gun owners who are otherwise carrying a firearm legally can be subject to a five year prison
sentence simply for driving past a school.
Do you support legislation to repeal the 1996 gun free school zones act?
Yes __X__ No ____
5. Though there is no technical definition of a “high capacity” magazine (firearm ammunition
feeding device), gun control proponents designate some magazines as “high capacity” based on an
arbitrarily chosen number of rounds a magazine can hold.
Would you oppose legislation banning the manufacture, sale or possession of large-capacity
magazines?
Yes __X___ No _____ If NO, what size magazine would you support banning? ____
6. Gun control advocates are seeking to prohibit 18-20 year-olds from possessing firearms, which
would treat young adults as if they have no Second Amendment rights even though they are old
enough to serve in the armed forces and to vote.
Would you oppose legislation that would take away the right of 18-20 year-olds to possess
firearms?
Yes __X___ No _____
7. In April of 2013, the United Nations (U.N.) approved the Arms Trade Treaty (ATT) which seeks
to regulate the trade and marketing of small arms. Since the United States is a member of the U.N.,
the Obama administration has already signed onto the ATT and the President now wants the U.S.
Senate to ratify the treaty. Ratifying the ATT would force the United States to submit to the U.N.
and any regulations regarding small arms.
Do you oppose the ATT which was approved by the U.N.?
Yes _X___ No ____
And the US should get out of the U.N.!
8. The Justice Department reported in 1989 that, “Any system that requires a criminal history
record check prior to the purchase of a firearm creates the potential for the automated tracking of
individuals who seek to purchase a firearm.” This means that any background check – whether an
“instant check” or otherwise – can result in a registration list of gun owners.
3. <
Would you support a repeal of the 1993 Brady instant check?
Yes _X___ No ____
9. Gun control advocates have proposed legislation requiring the ballistic marking (“Micro-
stamping) of all fired cartridge casings.
Would you oppose any legislation requiring that cartridge casings be “micro-stamped” with a
unique identification code?
Yes __X__ No ____
10. In 1996, Congress enacted a gun ban known as the Lautenberg Misdemeanor Gun Ban.
Because this ban covers misdemeanors, it disarms otherwise law-abiding citizens for life – for
offenses as slight as spanking a child or grabbing a spouse’s wrist.
Do you support a repeal of the Lautenberg Misdemeanor Gun Ban?
Yes _X___ No ____
11. Legislation in Congress would allow a person who can legally carry a concealed firearm in his
or her home state to also have the right to carry in other states. The specific legislation GOA
supports does not establish national standards and is “constitutional carry” friendly in that it
recognizes the right to carry concealed firearms without forcing states to adopt a permitting system.
Would you support recognition legislation for persons allowed to carry concealed firearms?
Yes _X___ No ____
12. Gun control advocates are seeking to require gun owners to keep firearms inoperable with a
trigger lock or other locking device when not in use.
Would you oppose any legislation mandating that trigger locks be applied to all firearms
when not in use?
Yes __X__ No ____
13. The 1968 Gun Control Act requires that imported firearms be “suitable for sporting purposes.”
Currently there is legislation in the House of Representatives to repeal the “sporting purposes”
distinction.
Would you support legislation repealing the “sporting purposes” test of the 1968 Act?
Yes _X___ No ____
4. <
14. In 2007, the Congress passed the “Veterans Disarmament Act” without a recorded vote in
either chamber. This legislation disarms hundreds of thousands of military veterans who are
suffering from ailments that frequently follow combat stress. The gun ban, therefore, denies
veterans their Second Amendment rights not on the basis of the conviction of a crime, but rather on
the basis of a doctor’s opinion.
Would you support legislation repealing this gun ban?
Yes__X__ No____
15. Anti-gun advocates have pushed legislation to impose a long prison sentence if you sell a gun to
a veteran, but negligently fail to realize he has problems with PTSD and has been placed in the
NICS system as a result. They label these proposals as a crackdown on “gun trafficking” but all this
legislation is designed to do is trap innocent gun owners. This legislation does nothing to prevent
illegal gun trafficking such as the Fast and Furious gun running program sanctioned by the Justice
Department.
Would you oppose this Veterans Gun Ban?
Yes _X___ No ____
16. The Justice Department’s “Fast and Furious” program resulted in thousands of firearms getting
into the hands of dangerous Mexican drug cartels. Several whistle blowers, including current and
former employees within the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives, believe that
one purpose of the program was to justify the push for more gun control in the United States.
Would you call for a the appointment of an independent counsel to investigate possible
wrongdoing by the BATFE, FBI, and the Offices of Attorney General and Deputy Attorney
General in connection with this program?
Yes _X___ No ____
17. In 1986, the federal government passed an immigration amnesty bill. In a few years, this law
turned California from a “swing state” to an anti-gun state which leads the country in banning and
registering firearms and ammunition. Now, anti-gun Members of Congress are supporting an
amnesty bill which could add up to more than 8 million potential anti-gun voters to the electorate.
Would you oppose any such anti-gun amnesty bill?
Yes __X__ No ____
18. Legislation in Congress would end the current ban on recreational land controlled by the Army
Corps of Engineers if (1) the person is not otherwise prohibited from possessing a firearm and (2)
possession is in compliance with the laws of the state.
Would you support legislation repealing the gun ban on Army Corps of Engineers land?
Yes __X___ No _____
5. <
19. Legislation in Congress would prohibit the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) from
banning, on federal public land, hunting equipment that contains lead, zinc, copper, or brass. Such
an action by the EPA would result in a backdoor ban on ammunition.
Would you support legislation preventing the EPA from banning lead and other ammunition?
Yes __X___ No _____
************************************************************************
-- Candidate Authorization –
My signature affirms that the answers given above accurately represent my views.
___________________________________________________ __7/22/2014___________
Candidate’s Signature Date