Objectives of the meeting
• To share ActionAid budget analysis on health
with key stakeholders in the sector
• To identify and create a learning platform
among interested stakeholders
• Map 2014 budget monitoring initiatives by
stakeholders
• Facilitate a platform for budget planning and
advocacy
2014 Appropriation on Health
Background
• The 2014 Appropriation act was signed into
law in May 2014
• A total of N4.67tn appropriated for as against
N4.62 proposed
• FMOH received N264bn, 2bn increase from
the proposed N262bn
2013 Context
• Dwindling resources from oil due to oil theft
• Striking health workers
• Slow implementation due to delayed passage
of 2013 budget
• 11300 frontline health workers employed
• 10,000 benefit from conditional cash transfers
• Guinea worm control and wild polio virus
contained
2013 Context
• Commendation from United Nations towards
achieving MDG 5
• 65 percent reduction in maternal mortality
between 2000 and 2013
• increased skilled birth attendants from 17
percent in 2000 to 60 percent in 2013
• Nigeria is not listed in UNDP report of top 20
countries with accelerated performance
Objective of the study
• To compare health funding vis a vis international
commitments on health by Nigeria Government
• To review 2014 appropriation act a view to
ascertaining if the government is progressively
addressing key programs for vulnerable groups in
society including women and chidren
• To make recommendations highlighting key areas
and alternatives that will impact on poor and
vulnerable groups
Scope of the analysis
• The analysis is limited to four Key MDAs
including NPHCDA, FMOH HQ and NHIS and
• Agencies with relatively higher allocations
within the Ministry
Proposed Vs Enacted
Health 2014 proposal 2014 Enacted
Total health budget 262,742,351,874 264,461,210,950.00
Personnel 210,519,482,396 208,543,188,775.00
Overhead 5,883,484,772 6,400,641,451
Capital 46,339,384,706 49,517,380,725
Is Govt progressively funding health
commitment?
The
percapita
spending
on health
for a
population
of 160m
Nigerians
is ju
N29,000
FMOH HQ
• Total budget N11.89bn
• Capital N5.7bn (47%)
• Introduced 16 new projects
• Has 30 ongoing projects
• N3bn to be spent directly on issues that
benefit integrated maternal neonatal and
child health (IMNCH) including guinea worm
eradication ( attached worksheets)
National Primary Health Care
Development Agency (NPHCDA)
National Primary Health Care
Development Agency (NPHCDA)
• NPHCDA,s budget primarily targets IMNCH
issues
• From an initial proposed N11bn by Executives
• N19bn got approved
• 20 ongoing projects
• 150+ new projects introduced – mainly on
construction of health centres across the
country (N7bn)
Cumulative summary allocation on
key areas
Budget Area Amount
R.Immunizatonn( MDG)
2,156,300,000
MSS 1,441,821,640
COMM HEALTH 1,000,080,000
NSHDP/PHC REVIEW 1,502,196,929
POLIO ERADICATION 3,650,775,386
Construction of Health centres N7bn
National Health Insurance Scheme
NHIS BUDGET %
Recurrent 68,931,674.00 2.3
Capital 2,974,192,365 97.7
Total 3,043,124,039
NHIS MCH Budget
• N2,3993,253,000 to support Maternal and
Child health insurance programme (MDG)
• Grossly inadequate for the population of child
bearing women and children 0-5 years.
Additional Funds from SURE-P
Item AmountRemarks
MATERNAL & CHILD
HEALTH 12,050,000,000
NHIS
FMH-POLIO
ERADICATION
PROGRAMME
4,120,000,000
Is this operational
cost?
NPHCDA POLIO ERAD,
PROGRAMME
2,500,000,000
COUNTERPART FUND
FOR HIV/AIDS
PROGRAMME
8,000,000,000
MDA not specified
Emerging Issues
• Reduction in mainstream funding to MDA and
increased funding from SURE – P
• Too much focus on infrastructure as against
skills acquisition, training and service
provision
• Poor budget planning between executives and
Legislature resulting in
Conclusion
• The 2014 budget came in to force in the
middle of the year
• To what extent can this budget be
implemented
• Considering most forth coming general
election
• now is the time to monitor performance
Matters Arising
• Funding implication for MCH
- adequate, underfunded or underspending
- Advocacy
- Getting involved in the budget planning from the start
- Setting MCH priorities/influencing the budget
- - advocacy to Legislators
• Organizing for change
- Capacity development on budget analysis for stakeholder
- Strategic planning meeting

2014 appropriation on health

  • 1.
    Objectives of themeeting • To share ActionAid budget analysis on health with key stakeholders in the sector • To identify and create a learning platform among interested stakeholders • Map 2014 budget monitoring initiatives by stakeholders • Facilitate a platform for budget planning and advocacy
  • 2.
  • 3.
    Background • The 2014Appropriation act was signed into law in May 2014 • A total of N4.67tn appropriated for as against N4.62 proposed • FMOH received N264bn, 2bn increase from the proposed N262bn
  • 4.
    2013 Context • Dwindlingresources from oil due to oil theft • Striking health workers • Slow implementation due to delayed passage of 2013 budget • 11300 frontline health workers employed • 10,000 benefit from conditional cash transfers • Guinea worm control and wild polio virus contained
  • 5.
    2013 Context • Commendationfrom United Nations towards achieving MDG 5 • 65 percent reduction in maternal mortality between 2000 and 2013 • increased skilled birth attendants from 17 percent in 2000 to 60 percent in 2013 • Nigeria is not listed in UNDP report of top 20 countries with accelerated performance
  • 6.
    Objective of thestudy • To compare health funding vis a vis international commitments on health by Nigeria Government • To review 2014 appropriation act a view to ascertaining if the government is progressively addressing key programs for vulnerable groups in society including women and chidren • To make recommendations highlighting key areas and alternatives that will impact on poor and vulnerable groups
  • 7.
    Scope of theanalysis • The analysis is limited to four Key MDAs including NPHCDA, FMOH HQ and NHIS and • Agencies with relatively higher allocations within the Ministry
  • 8.
    Proposed Vs Enacted Health2014 proposal 2014 Enacted Total health budget 262,742,351,874 264,461,210,950.00 Personnel 210,519,482,396 208,543,188,775.00 Overhead 5,883,484,772 6,400,641,451 Capital 46,339,384,706 49,517,380,725
  • 9.
    Is Govt progressivelyfunding health commitment? The percapita spending on health for a population of 160m Nigerians is ju N29,000
  • 11.
    FMOH HQ • Totalbudget N11.89bn • Capital N5.7bn (47%) • Introduced 16 new projects • Has 30 ongoing projects • N3bn to be spent directly on issues that benefit integrated maternal neonatal and child health (IMNCH) including guinea worm eradication ( attached worksheets)
  • 13.
    National Primary HealthCare Development Agency (NPHCDA)
  • 14.
    National Primary HealthCare Development Agency (NPHCDA) • NPHCDA,s budget primarily targets IMNCH issues • From an initial proposed N11bn by Executives • N19bn got approved • 20 ongoing projects • 150+ new projects introduced – mainly on construction of health centres across the country (N7bn)
  • 16.
    Cumulative summary allocationon key areas Budget Area Amount R.Immunizatonn( MDG) 2,156,300,000 MSS 1,441,821,640 COMM HEALTH 1,000,080,000 NSHDP/PHC REVIEW 1,502,196,929 POLIO ERADICATION 3,650,775,386 Construction of Health centres N7bn
  • 17.
    National Health InsuranceScheme NHIS BUDGET % Recurrent 68,931,674.00 2.3 Capital 2,974,192,365 97.7 Total 3,043,124,039
  • 18.
    NHIS MCH Budget •N2,3993,253,000 to support Maternal and Child health insurance programme (MDG) • Grossly inadequate for the population of child bearing women and children 0-5 years.
  • 19.
    Additional Funds fromSURE-P Item AmountRemarks MATERNAL & CHILD HEALTH 12,050,000,000 NHIS FMH-POLIO ERADICATION PROGRAMME 4,120,000,000 Is this operational cost? NPHCDA POLIO ERAD, PROGRAMME 2,500,000,000 COUNTERPART FUND FOR HIV/AIDS PROGRAMME 8,000,000,000 MDA not specified
  • 20.
    Emerging Issues • Reductionin mainstream funding to MDA and increased funding from SURE – P • Too much focus on infrastructure as against skills acquisition, training and service provision • Poor budget planning between executives and Legislature resulting in
  • 21.
    Conclusion • The 2014budget came in to force in the middle of the year • To what extent can this budget be implemented • Considering most forth coming general election • now is the time to monitor performance
  • 22.
    Matters Arising • Fundingimplication for MCH - adequate, underfunded or underspending - Advocacy - Getting involved in the budget planning from the start - Setting MCH priorities/influencing the budget - - advocacy to Legislators • Organizing for change - Capacity development on budget analysis for stakeholder - Strategic planning meeting