This document discusses opening access to agricultural information in Africa. It outlines benefits like reaching target audiences and increasing access to resources, as well as challenges like lack of time, funding, and enabling policies. Researchers prefer traditional routes to communicate outputs but are open to modern methods with support. Overall, making information openly available relies on individuals and institutions need strategic policies to change behaviors and better share knowledge.
1. Opening up Research
Outputs and
Knowledge in
Agriculture:
Benefits and
Challenges
Regional Expert Consultation
on Opening Access to Agricultural Information in Africa
Presented by Franz Martin
Knowledge and Capacity for Development www.ciard.net
information@ciard.net
10. Agric. Research Institutional Repositories
Status in Ghana
Numbeof f publica ions
tions
Number r o pub lic at
Graph by FAO. Source data from INSTI, Ghana. March, 2010
11. Accessibility of research outputs
in some International Centres
Centre A Centre B Centre C
Bibliographic Full Text Resources Search Engines
References
Graph by FAO. Source data from Agricultural Information Worldwide. Vol. 3. No.1 (2010)
13. Region(s) where most respondents‘ work
is carried out.
Europe 4.6% Northern America 4.1%
Caribbean
6.9%
Asia and Pacific 23.7%
Africa 32.6%
Latin America 53.5%
Source: CIARD. Global Survey for Researchers. 2011
14. FACTORS ENCOURAGING
effective communication of research outputs
Most important:
- Institutional demands to report/communicate
- Opportunities for career enhancement
- Access to adequate IT infrastructure
- Acknowledgement of contributions
Less important:
- Direct monetary rewards
(related to royalties and
personal development)
Source: CIARD. Global Survey for Researchers. 2011
16. BARRIERS
preventing from communicating research
Most important:
- Lack of resources/time and funding
- Weak linkages between researchers and end users
- Lack of enabling institutional policies
Less important:
- Concerns about stealing and reuse of outputs
- Lack of skills/access to communication methods
- Poor IT infrastructure
Source: CIARD Global Survey for Researchers. 2011
19. RESEARCH OUTPUTS PRODUCED
Traditional print-based formats still predominate...
but digital ones are now penetrating (20-35%)
Most outputs are communicated
through openly accessible, no-cost routes.
Source: CIARD Global Survey for Researchers. 2011
20. THE WAY FORWARD
Making research outputs openly available
often relies on individuals.
Individuals’ behaviours can be influenced
by institutional factors/barriers.
Relevant strategic policy frameworks are
required to change institutional/
individual behaviours.
21. THE WAY FORWARD
These findings can be considered by
senior managers to review their
organizational policies.
22. Coherence in Information
for Agricultural Research for Development
A global movement that promotes and sustain
the openness of agricultural knowledge to all.
23. The Movement
Founding Partners
More than 150 other organizations participating… www.ciard.net
24. CIARD support for overcoming
the Challenges in Research Communication
Our institution
has no policy on We don’t have time to
communicating adapt our results into the
its outputs what extensionists want
We have no systems
Other scientists will
and tools for Internet
publish our results if we
dissemination
share them
There are no staff
with the skills in
digital technologies
www.ciard.net
25. Opening up Research
Outputs and
Knowledge in
Agriculture:
Benefits and
Challenges
Regional Expert Consultation
on Opening Access to Agricultural Information in Africa
Presented by Franz Martin
Knowledge and Capacity for Development www.ciard.net
information@ciard.net
Editor's Notes
When you say ‘outputs’ do you mean the technology, the know-how of ag innovation, i.e. knowledge on ag innov? Suggest “ Rapid agricultural innovation is knowledge-intensive and depends on access to information and knowledge” “ Most public domain agricultural information and knowledge not yet widely accessible” seems to fit better in the challenges slide 4
Introducing the issue of lack of access to the outputs of African agricultural research
Noting in a positive context that output of traditional scientific publications from African scientists has been rising over the last decade in all parts of the continent. Note: This covers all subjects not just agriculture.
Graphical representation of how African scientists are collaborating together – as reflected by co-authoring of scientific papers together. Shows language barriers (Anglo:Franco) and regional barriers to collaboration Note: This covers all subjects not just agriculture.
Graphic representation of the amount of web-based information/content across continents/regions. Note: This covers all subjects not just agriculture.
Under the Ghana Agricultural Information Network System (GAINS), five national organizations are making their full text research outputs accessible in digital format, and have had varying degrees of success so far.
This slide shows how three agricultural research centres are struggling with making their research outputs truly accessible in three generic areas, starting with % accessibility of Bibliographic References, moving to % accessibility of Full Text, and lastly % accessibility through international search engines/indexes. It can be noted that these issues affect international centres just as much as they affect national ones. Note: The various segments of the diagram represent different indicators of accessibility within each of the three general categories – the details have been left out to simplify the diagrams.
Institutional/organizational behaviour can be changed by the development of relevant strategic and policy frameworks. In many cases individual behaviour will not be changed unless there are policy requirements which influence the individual.
CIARD aims to influence and provide support at both the level of the organization and of the individual. The movement is a collective commitment to promote and sustain the openness of agricultural knowledge for all. CIARD aims to provide guidance and support to, and through this to change the behaviour of, both individuals and institutions. Through institutional change will come also enhanced individual change and, in the case of the CIARD initiative, increased and pervasive openness of research outputs. There is already much ‘good practices’ in institutions/organizations around the world, but a great deal more needs to be catalysed.