This document summarizes an introduction to ethics session which included discussing case studies and moral theories. The session covered key concepts in ethics including deontological, consequentialist, and virtue-based moral theories. It also discussed challenges to morality such as egoism, relativism, skepticism, and nihilism. Recommended readings on ethics were provided at the end.

1. Session 1: Introduction to
Ethics
Dr. Chan Ho Mun
Department of Public and Social Administration
City University of Hong Kong
June 6, 2007

2. Cases Studies
 Selected movie scene from “Vertical Limit”.
 Should the son kill the father?
 If you were the son,….
 If you were the daughter,…
 If you were the father,…
 William’s story of Jim and the Indians
 What should he do?
 If you were Jim,...

3.  Four versions of the trolley problem
 What are your answers and justifications?
 Would the answers be different if you were the
person who need to make the decision and
take the action?
 Craniotomy (crushing the skull of the unborn
child to save the life of a pregnant woman) vs
Hysterectomy (save the life of a pregnant
woman by the removal of cancerous uterus)
 Is your response in this case consistent with
the ones in other cases?

4. What is ethics?
 (1) What makes an act morally right or wrong
(a question of conduct)?
 (2) What makes a person or something good
or bad (a question of value)?
 (3) How to draw the correct conclusion about
what we ought to do or what kind of person
we ought to be?
 (1) and (2) are theoretical/conceptual
questions and (3) is a practical question
about moral reasoning.

5. Characteristics of Ethical Issues
 Moral disagreements are common. Moral
issues are often controversial and open-
ended. It is often difficult to arrive at some
consensus.
 How serious could people disagree with one
another? Could the disagreement be radical
and fundamental?
 People even disagree about what and how
much they disagree.

6. Moral Theories
 A moral theory consists of a set of moral
principles.
 These principles specify the conditions under
which an action is morally right or wrong, or
what makes a person or something good or
bad. (Theoretical questions (1) and (2))
 They purport to guide our moral reasoning
(Practical question (3)).

7.  Together with facts about different moral
situations, moral rules that guide the morality
of specific kinds of actions could be derived.
 Together with facts about an individual case,
we can further judge whether an individual
act is morally right or wrong, or whether a
person or something is good or bad.

8. Structure of moral action
 Person  Action  Consequence
 Person: What makes a person morally good?
Be courageous, kind, and so on? Do the
motive, character, and intention of the person
matter in deciding whether an action is right
or wrong?
 Action: What makes an action morally right?
Should the motive, character, or intention of
the actor be taken into consideration? Should
it be solely determined by the consequences?
 Consequence: What constitutes a good or
bad consequence?

9. Three major kinds of moral theories
 Consequence-based theories
 Deontological theories
 Virtue-based theories (approaches)

10. Theoretical Ethics vs Practical Ethics
 The term “applied ethics” is misleading.
 It makes “practical ethics” sound like applied
mathematics.
 Ethical theories sometimes give no clear-cut
answer to specific moral problems. The top-
down approach does not always work.
Examples: euthanasia and abortion.

11.  Bottom-up approach (Case-based approach):
 Start with an obvious (real or hypothetical)
case where we have the strong intuition or
considered judgement that it is morally right or
wrong.
 Analogical reasoning: compare it with a
problematic case that is structurally similar
and then draw the same conclusion.
 Example: Thomson’s arguments for and
Marquis’s argument against abortion.

12. Anti-theory Approach
 Cases have their own voices. This gives us a
very crucial criterion for evaluating moral
theories.
 A moral theory is accepted if it can make sense
of and be compatible with our various intuitively
appealing beliefs and ideas or firmly held
judgements about morality.

13.  Anti-theory approach (moral particularism):
 No theory can meet the above criterion.
 Moral precepts are only rules of thumbs with
lots of loopholes and exceptions. There is no
theory in ethics but only approaches.
 Something like the case law approach should
be adopted.

14. Challenges to Morality
 Egoism
 Psychological egoism: Human actions are
motivated by their self-interests.
 Ethical egoism: One should only promote
one’s own interests, or it is alright for everyone
to do so.
 Relativism
 Descriptive relativism: People of different
cultures follow different norms and have
different conceptions of the good.

15.  Ethical relativism: What makes an act morally
right and wrong or something morally good or
bad depends on the cultural context in which
the question is raised.
 Moral skepticism
 Why should I be moral? It is impossible to give
a non-question begging answer.
 We can never justify our moral beliefs and
ideas.

16.  Moral Nihilism
 Ethical claims are either fictitious (according to
error theories) or neither true nor false.
 They are not answerable to any reality.
 There is no such thing called “morality”.

17. Suggested Readings:
 Elizabeth Burns & Stephen Law (eds.),
Philosophy for AS and A2, London:
Routledge, 2004.
 Julia Driver, Ethics: The Fundamentals,
Oxford: Blackwell Publishing, 2007.
 Christopher Hamilton, Understanding
Philosophy for AS Level, Cheltenham: Nelson
Thornes, 2003.

18.  James Rachels, The Elements of Moral
Philosophy, 4th ed., Boston: McGraw-Hill,
2003.
 Nina Rosenstand, The Moral of the Story: An
Introduction to Ethics, 5th ed., Boston:
McGraw-Hill, 2005.
 Mark Timmons, Moral Theory: An Introduction,
Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, 2002.