The document outlines key issues likely to be priorities for the new Trump administration in its first six months, including funding the government, tax reform, immigration, infrastructure, repealing/replacing the Affordable Care Act, regulatory reform, and energy policy. It also discusses leadership changes in Congress and anticipated cabinet appointments. Major priorities will be reducing taxes, strengthening immigration enforcement and border security, and undoing Obama-era regulations.
With Republicans poised to assert complete control over the Congress and in the White House, companies seeking to engage inside the Beltway will confront a new political reality.
To help companies navigate the unpredictable and unanticipated landscape they now face, Brunswick analyzed the key business-critical issues that are likely to rank high on President-elect Trump’s agenda during his first 100 days in office.
Contact our Washington, DC office for more information:
www.brunswickgroup.com/contact-us/washington-dc/
The 2016 presidential election is already being billed as the most expensive in history, but the value of its impact on U.S. companies and multinationals operating in the U.S. could be much greater. From the fate of corporate inversions to the future of energy and climate change regulations, never before has so much ridden on the outcome of a single vote.
For more information contact:
David Sutphen: www.brunswickgroup.com/people/directory/david-sutphen/
Or our Washington, DC office: www.brunswickgroup.com/contact-us/washington-dc/
U.S. Presidential election China implications Brunswick Group
The unprecedented nature of this election has communication implications for companies across the globe, and especially for China. The country is a frequent topic in presidential candidates’ speeches on the campaign trail.
Companies operating in China, and particularly those with strong ties to both China and the U.S., should consider the white-hot campaign spotlight on China during the election. Clear communication, careful planning, and deliberate timing are more essential now than ever.
For more information please contact our following offices:
Beijing: www.brunswickgroup.com/contact-us/beijing/
Hong Kong: www.brunswickgroup.com/contact-us/hong-kong/
Shanghai: www.brunswickgroup.com/contact-us/shanghai/
Washington, DC: www.brunswickgroup.com/contact-us/washington-dc/
Big Business, Big Issues: The Winners and Losers from the U.S. Midterm ElectionsBrunswick Group
The U.S. midterm elections have dealt a new setback to President Obama. As was widely expected, voters have given Republicans control of both chambers of Congress, weakening the president’s already diminished influence in his last two years in office.
But there’s another set of winners and losers in this this election: the sectors, issues and interest groups that have a stake in the outcome.
Brunswick Group’s take on what the 2014 midterm elections mean for your companies, industries and interest groups.
For more information please contact our Washington, DC office: http://www.brunswickgroup.com/contact-us/washington-dc/
TRUMP: THE BEAUTIFUL PRESIDENT OF CYNOSUREDAVID OKOYE
I LOVE TRUMP | Okoye David Ikechukwu
The phrase I love Trump has risen to be one of the most used phrases in recent confessions made by many concerning a sitting president. Phenomenal!
With Republicans poised to assert complete control over the Congress and in the White House, companies seeking to engage inside the Beltway will confront a new political reality.
To help companies navigate the unpredictable and unanticipated landscape they now face, Brunswick analyzed the key business-critical issues that are likely to rank high on President-elect Trump’s agenda during his first 100 days in office.
Contact our Washington, DC office for more information:
www.brunswickgroup.com/contact-us/washington-dc/
The 2016 presidential election is already being billed as the most expensive in history, but the value of its impact on U.S. companies and multinationals operating in the U.S. could be much greater. From the fate of corporate inversions to the future of energy and climate change regulations, never before has so much ridden on the outcome of a single vote.
For more information contact:
David Sutphen: www.brunswickgroup.com/people/directory/david-sutphen/
Or our Washington, DC office: www.brunswickgroup.com/contact-us/washington-dc/
U.S. Presidential election China implications Brunswick Group
The unprecedented nature of this election has communication implications for companies across the globe, and especially for China. The country is a frequent topic in presidential candidates’ speeches on the campaign trail.
Companies operating in China, and particularly those with strong ties to both China and the U.S., should consider the white-hot campaign spotlight on China during the election. Clear communication, careful planning, and deliberate timing are more essential now than ever.
For more information please contact our following offices:
Beijing: www.brunswickgroup.com/contact-us/beijing/
Hong Kong: www.brunswickgroup.com/contact-us/hong-kong/
Shanghai: www.brunswickgroup.com/contact-us/shanghai/
Washington, DC: www.brunswickgroup.com/contact-us/washington-dc/
Big Business, Big Issues: The Winners and Losers from the U.S. Midterm ElectionsBrunswick Group
The U.S. midterm elections have dealt a new setback to President Obama. As was widely expected, voters have given Republicans control of both chambers of Congress, weakening the president’s already diminished influence in his last two years in office.
But there’s another set of winners and losers in this this election: the sectors, issues and interest groups that have a stake in the outcome.
Brunswick Group’s take on what the 2014 midterm elections mean for your companies, industries and interest groups.
For more information please contact our Washington, DC office: http://www.brunswickgroup.com/contact-us/washington-dc/
TRUMP: THE BEAUTIFUL PRESIDENT OF CYNOSUREDAVID OKOYE
I LOVE TRUMP | Okoye David Ikechukwu
The phrase I love Trump has risen to be one of the most used phrases in recent confessions made by many concerning a sitting president. Phenomenal!
"It's Jobs, Stupid": Democracy Corps/Campaign for America's Future Pollourfuture
A Democracy Corps/Campaign for America's Future survey examines the top economic priorities of American voters, the extent to which they are rejecting the economic priorities of conservatives and offers insight into what Democrats will have to do in order to regain the support of the public. More details on the poll and links to related material on ourfuture.org/economypoll2011
The White House is taking yet another big step to declare any and all oversight conducted by the House of Representatives fundamentally illegitimate, placing President Trump above accountability entirely.
Somtypes Focusreport - What are you talking about, Mr. TrumpSomtypes
On November 8, 2016, Donald Trump (the oldest candidate ever - sad!) was elected with 62.984.825 votes (46.09%) as the 58th President of the United States of America.
Somtypes AI has analyzed the communications 30 days before and 30 days after the election with its method of making Smart Data from Big Data and structured the most important contributions on the most important topics in this focus report.
US Midterm Elections: What Happened, Why it happened, and What it means
Speaker: Paul Sracic
Lecture video is available here: https://youtu.be/UczRVA2TdJY
Government Shutdown to Put Brakes on Market - The Real Estate Report October/...AMSI, San Francisco
The Real Estate Report October/November, local market trends San Francisco: "Government Shutdown to Put Brakes on Market" by AMSI's Real Estate Broker Robb Fleischer
Democracy Corps/Campaign for America's Future Election 2010 Pollourfuture
A Democracy Corps/Campaign for America's Future poll highlights the messages voters sought to convey on Tuesday. It not only shows that voter fears about the economy drove this election, but it also shows that conservatives do not have a mandate from voters for their proposals for deep cuts in spending combined with tax cuts for the rich. There is deep anger at the failure of government to make it work for middle class families, even as Wall Street got bailed out.
on night finally came after a tumultuous year of Hillary
Clinton and Donald Trump battling, and Americans have
voted for Donald Trump to be the 45th president of the United
States. With a business mogul in the White House comes
questions about how markets will react and what changes
individuals can expect in their day-to-day financial lives, if his
policies are enacted.
Personal Capital developed this report to assess the shortand
long-term market and personal finance implications of a
Trump presidency. This report includes an analysis of Trump’s
policies on taxes, Social Security, education and health care to
help investors understand how their money may be affected,
with actionable advice on how to plan accordingly.
The bottom line: Investors should not let short-term
political gyrations drive their long-ter
MSL Germany - Public Affairs Survey 2015 (engl.)MSL Germany
For the 14th consecutive year, we asked public affairs professionals in Germany to evaluate the political status quo and tell us about the latest developments in the public affairs sector. The following is a summary of the key results of this year’s survey:
Confidence in politics restored
Following a notable dip in the first year of the Grand Coalition (22 per cent), confidence in politicians and their actions bounced back this year, with 39 per cent of respondents saying that politicians were ‘reliable partners’. Christian Democrats received the greatest vote of confidence. 89 per cent of respondents considered their relationships with the CDU to be ‘constructive’.
Government’s approval ratings improve
Similarly, confidence in the Grand Coalition’s performance went up. 57 per cent said that the Federal Government was doing a ‘good job’, an improvement of 14 per cent on last year.
Especially the Government’s foreign trade policy, which includes TTIP, was rated favourably by public affairs professionals. Opposition parties (i. e. Greens and Left Party), on the other hand, were given negative ratings.
Public affairs spending goes up
Corporations and trade associations increased their spending on public affairs in the past 12 months. 39 per cent spent more on public affairs personnel, while 45 per cent increased their spending on external service providers, including consulting work. Of these, more than half favoured full-service consultancies with a strong public affairs offering, as opposed to public affairs only outfits or law firms.
Digital public affairs continues to grow
The use of social media is becoming even more commonplace in public affairs. 52 per cent of respondents use Twitter, while 36 per cent rely on Facebook, 29 per cent on the German-centric career platform Xing, and 25 per cent on its international counterpart LinkedIn.
To supplement Qorvis MSLGROUP's Guide to the Trump Administration, we have created a set of appendencies highlighting expected cabinet and staff appointments as of 12/1/2016.
In today's political environment, is it possible to have the kinds of conversation that makes democracy meaningful? The Twin Cities Election Forum worked to produce a list of reasons why Twin Cities voters might support each of the major-party presidential candidates and to cultivate understanding across the partisan divide.
Donald Trump and the future of U.S. leadershipSusana Gallardo
The United States has never had a president like Donald Trump. He is a real
estate investor, golf course developer, casino owner, product brander and
television personality with no prior experience in government or in competing for
elective office. He ran for president on the Republican ticket, but he has no
enduring loyalties to either political party, although he has undeniably tied his
political fortunes to the Republican Party. In decided contrast with other recent
administrations, there is not a single Democrat in the Trump cabinet, and AfricanAmericans,
Asian-Americans, Latinos and women are all minimally represented.
"It's Jobs, Stupid": Democracy Corps/Campaign for America's Future Pollourfuture
A Democracy Corps/Campaign for America's Future survey examines the top economic priorities of American voters, the extent to which they are rejecting the economic priorities of conservatives and offers insight into what Democrats will have to do in order to regain the support of the public. More details on the poll and links to related material on ourfuture.org/economypoll2011
The White House is taking yet another big step to declare any and all oversight conducted by the House of Representatives fundamentally illegitimate, placing President Trump above accountability entirely.
Somtypes Focusreport - What are you talking about, Mr. TrumpSomtypes
On November 8, 2016, Donald Trump (the oldest candidate ever - sad!) was elected with 62.984.825 votes (46.09%) as the 58th President of the United States of America.
Somtypes AI has analyzed the communications 30 days before and 30 days after the election with its method of making Smart Data from Big Data and structured the most important contributions on the most important topics in this focus report.
US Midterm Elections: What Happened, Why it happened, and What it means
Speaker: Paul Sracic
Lecture video is available here: https://youtu.be/UczRVA2TdJY
Government Shutdown to Put Brakes on Market - The Real Estate Report October/...AMSI, San Francisco
The Real Estate Report October/November, local market trends San Francisco: "Government Shutdown to Put Brakes on Market" by AMSI's Real Estate Broker Robb Fleischer
Democracy Corps/Campaign for America's Future Election 2010 Pollourfuture
A Democracy Corps/Campaign for America's Future poll highlights the messages voters sought to convey on Tuesday. It not only shows that voter fears about the economy drove this election, but it also shows that conservatives do not have a mandate from voters for their proposals for deep cuts in spending combined with tax cuts for the rich. There is deep anger at the failure of government to make it work for middle class families, even as Wall Street got bailed out.
on night finally came after a tumultuous year of Hillary
Clinton and Donald Trump battling, and Americans have
voted for Donald Trump to be the 45th president of the United
States. With a business mogul in the White House comes
questions about how markets will react and what changes
individuals can expect in their day-to-day financial lives, if his
policies are enacted.
Personal Capital developed this report to assess the shortand
long-term market and personal finance implications of a
Trump presidency. This report includes an analysis of Trump’s
policies on taxes, Social Security, education and health care to
help investors understand how their money may be affected,
with actionable advice on how to plan accordingly.
The bottom line: Investors should not let short-term
political gyrations drive their long-ter
MSL Germany - Public Affairs Survey 2015 (engl.)MSL Germany
For the 14th consecutive year, we asked public affairs professionals in Germany to evaluate the political status quo and tell us about the latest developments in the public affairs sector. The following is a summary of the key results of this year’s survey:
Confidence in politics restored
Following a notable dip in the first year of the Grand Coalition (22 per cent), confidence in politicians and their actions bounced back this year, with 39 per cent of respondents saying that politicians were ‘reliable partners’. Christian Democrats received the greatest vote of confidence. 89 per cent of respondents considered their relationships with the CDU to be ‘constructive’.
Government’s approval ratings improve
Similarly, confidence in the Grand Coalition’s performance went up. 57 per cent said that the Federal Government was doing a ‘good job’, an improvement of 14 per cent on last year.
Especially the Government’s foreign trade policy, which includes TTIP, was rated favourably by public affairs professionals. Opposition parties (i. e. Greens and Left Party), on the other hand, were given negative ratings.
Public affairs spending goes up
Corporations and trade associations increased their spending on public affairs in the past 12 months. 39 per cent spent more on public affairs personnel, while 45 per cent increased their spending on external service providers, including consulting work. Of these, more than half favoured full-service consultancies with a strong public affairs offering, as opposed to public affairs only outfits or law firms.
Digital public affairs continues to grow
The use of social media is becoming even more commonplace in public affairs. 52 per cent of respondents use Twitter, while 36 per cent rely on Facebook, 29 per cent on the German-centric career platform Xing, and 25 per cent on its international counterpart LinkedIn.
To supplement Qorvis MSLGROUP's Guide to the Trump Administration, we have created a set of appendencies highlighting expected cabinet and staff appointments as of 12/1/2016.
In today's political environment, is it possible to have the kinds of conversation that makes democracy meaningful? The Twin Cities Election Forum worked to produce a list of reasons why Twin Cities voters might support each of the major-party presidential candidates and to cultivate understanding across the partisan divide.
Donald Trump and the future of U.S. leadershipSusana Gallardo
The United States has never had a president like Donald Trump. He is a real
estate investor, golf course developer, casino owner, product brander and
television personality with no prior experience in government or in competing for
elective office. He ran for president on the Republican ticket, but he has no
enduring loyalties to either political party, although he has undeniably tied his
political fortunes to the Republican Party. In decided contrast with other recent
administrations, there is not a single Democrat in the Trump cabinet, and AfricanAmericans,
Asian-Americans, Latinos and women are all minimally represented.
SARAH BINDER is Professor of Political Science at George Washi.docxtodd331
SARAH BINDER is Professor of Political Science at George Washington University and a
Senior Fellow at the Brookings Institution. She is a co-author, with Mark Spindel, of The
Myth of Independence: How Congress Governs the Federal Reserve.
78 f o r e i g n a f f a i r s
How to Waste a
Congressional Majority
Trump and the Republican Congress
Sarah Binder
Governing is always hard in polarized times, but it has been especially hard during U.S. President Donald Trump’s first year in office. Undisciplined and unpopular, Trump has been
largely unable to advance his agenda on Capitol Hill despite Repub-
lican control of both houses of Congress. With his political capital
shrinking as his public approval falls, Trump will no doubt struggle to
deliver on his campaign promises to repeal the Affordable Care Act,
reform the tax code, build a wall along the southern border, and repair
the nation’s crumbling infrastructure.
It is tempting to blame Trump’s legislative failures on his lack of
government experience, his indifference to the details of policy, and
his tempestuous personality. But focusing only on personal character-
istics misses the political and institutional dynamics at play. The two
parties are deeply polarized, Republicans hold only a slim Senate
majority, and Republican conferences in both chambers cannot agree
on key issues. A more disciplined and popular president might have
managed to bring Republicans together. But huge obstacles would
still have remained. As it stands, Trump is heading into his second
year in office with little to show in terms of legislative victories—and
few reasons to believe his agenda will fare any better in the future.
STUCK IN NEUTRAL
Judging legislative accomplishments so early in a president’s term is
risky. Congressional Republicans won’t face voters until November
JF18_book.indb 78 11/16/17 6:14 PM
How to Waste a Congressional Majority
Ja n u a r y / Fe b r u a r y 2 0 18 79
2018, and Trump won’t for two more years after that. But so far, Trump’s
record pales beside those of other modern presidents. Ever since
Franklin Roosevelt’s extraordinary first 100 days, during which he
persuaded Congress to pass a raft of major laws to combat the Great
Depression, that mark has become a checkpoint in assessing presidential
performance. In their first 100 days, most presidents exploit their elec-
toral victory to push through major proposals. Even with Bill Clinton’s
rocky start in 1993, Democrats swiftly enacted the nation’s first family-
leave law, which had been vetoed by George H. W. Bush. In 2001,
George W. Bush made quick progress on a multitrillion-dollar tax cut, as
well as on landmark education reform. Within a month of taking office
in 2009, Barack Obama and a Democratic Congress had delivered the
largest fiscal stimulus since World War II, along with pay-equity and
children’s health-care reforms that Bush had vetoed.
Trump came into office with a litany.
Current Event #1 President Trump has voiced his concerns a.docxannettsparrow
Current Event #1
President Trump has voiced his concerns about the DACA (Deferred Action for
Childhood Arrivals) program. DACA is a program that was started by President Obama that
protects undocumented children that came to the US at a very young age with their parents.
President Trump is now considering terminating this program that could lead these often called,
Dreamers, to be deported to the country that they and their parents originally came from. Jeff
Sessions, Donald F. McGahn II, Senator Orrin G. Hatch and others have spoken against Trump
ending this program. Major entrepreneurs have also disagreed with Trumps new proposal
because of the potential of damaging our economy. Trump has stated that by Tuesday, he will
give an answer on whether he plans to propose this to legislation.
A major concept that connects to this article is the separation of powers in the United
States, including the executive, judicial and legislative branch. The executive branch enforces the
laws, the legislative branch makes the laws, and the judicial branch interprets the laws. This
concept is very important pertaining to this article because even though Trump will decide on
Tuesday on whether he wants DACA to end, Congress will decide to pass or not pass the federal
law. Without the separation of powers, the president could virtually put any law into place even
if it seemed unconstitutional. Another concept that is important along with separation of powers,
is our checks and balances. Checks and balances give each branch the power to check on the
other branches and keep them accountable. This concept can relate to this subject because the
legislature can reject the president’s new plan and can also override the executive’s veto by a
two-thirds vote. The judicial branch also has a role as they are a check on the legislature and can
rule certain laws unconstitutional if need be. As Trump makes his statement in the coming days,
it’s not only his voice that is important in this matter, but Americans, the judicial, and the
legislative branch.
With this topic, there are several viewpoints to consider. One perspective that some
Americans have, like Trump’s, is that DACA is a program for those who are illegal immigrants
and can cause fear in some citizens whose jobs are being taken from them. As American
demographics change and the Hispanic population is growing in the US, these changing
demographics are a consideration in how ending this program could affect the diversity of our
country. Hispanics are the second largest ethnic group in the US and their voice and viewpoints
are important to consider in issues of immigration. While the Hispanic population and those who
support the DREAMERS might want this program to continue, other ethic and racial groups,
who come to the US through legal immigration means, might want this program to end.
I agree with keeping DACA. I think of the Dreamers and ho.
Protiviti Flash report details key developments from the first 100 days of the Trump administration, from a business perspective. For more information, go to http://ow.ly/NDPm30bjnfB
Chapter Objectives1. Identify the stages of the policymaking pro.docxmccormicknadine86
Chapter Objectives
1. Identify the stages of the policymaking process.
2. Compare patterns of policy change, specifically budgetary incrementalism and punctuated equilibrium.
3. Discuss the various actors involved in making public policy and the different types of policy.
4. Examine the role of bureaucracies in policymaking and the politics involved.
At the beginning of 2018, one of the biggest policy areas under consideration by Congress and the president was immigration policy and specifically how to deal with people who were brought illegally to the United States as children. These individuals are commonly known as “Dreamers,” after legislation that was proposed to address the issue—the Development, Relief and Education for Alien Minors Act, or DREAM Act. In 2014, then president Barack Obama signed an executive order giving legal protection to children who were brought to the United States illegally by their parents, often called Dreamers. With many calling such an order unconstitutional, President Donald Trump rescinded the order in September 2017, calling on Congress to come up with a permanent legislative solution. In January 2018, after months of negotiating with no solution, congressional Democrats refused to vote on a short-term continuing resolution to continue funding the government without a deal on Dreamers, thereby shutting it down for three days, in order to push the issue of DACA, or the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals. In this instance, Democrats utilized their leverage in the Senate to force Republicans to finalize a policy that could be passed and adopted by Congress. Portrayed in the media, the issue has become embroiled in repeated recriminations between Democrats and President Trump, strong language, and tough negotiations. However, all of this obscures different analytical tools that political scientists use to examine the politics of policy areas like immigration.
While DACA and Dreamers deals with a small slice of immigration policy, a basic conundrum is why the United States has not been able to engage in comprehensive immigration reform for over two decades despite several tries in the US Congress. This chapter introduces some of the many ways through which political scientists may attempt to answer such a question. Why has it gotten stuck in the policy formulation and adoption stages? What actors are involved, and what do they want out of immigration policy? How does immigration policy compare with other policy areas in terms of achievement or even difficulty? In attempting to answer these questions, political scientists can begin to understand the policy dynamics of immigration specifically and public policy in general.
Looking at the immigration debates of early 2018, most of the attention has been devoted to the roles of the president and Congress. However, other actors are equally involved in the setting and carrying out of policy—in particular, bureaucracies like the Department of Homeland Security, whi ...
Chapter Objectives1. Identify the stages of the policymaking pro.docxspoonerneddy
Chapter Objectives
1. Identify the stages of the policymaking process.
2. Compare patterns of policy change, specifically budgetary incrementalism and punctuated equilibrium.
3. Discuss the various actors involved in making public policy and the different types of policy.
4. Examine the role of bureaucracies in policymaking and the politics involved.
At the beginning of 2018, one of the biggest policy areas under consideration by Congress and the president was immigration policy and specifically how to deal with people who were brought illegally to the United States as children. These individuals are commonly known as “Dreamers,” after legislation that was proposed to address the issue—the Development, Relief and Education for Alien Minors Act, or DREAM Act. In 2014, then president Barack Obama signed an executive order giving legal protection to children who were brought to the United States illegally by their parents, often called Dreamers. With many calling such an order unconstitutional, President Donald Trump rescinded the order in September 2017, calling on Congress to come up with a permanent legislative solution. In January 2018, after months of negotiating with no solution, congressional Democrats refused to vote on a short-term continuing resolution to continue funding the government without a deal on Dreamers, thereby shutting it down for three days, in order to push the issue of DACA, or the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals. In this instance, Democrats utilized their leverage in the Senate to force Republicans to finalize a policy that could be passed and adopted by Congress. Portrayed in the media, the issue has become embroiled in repeated recriminations between Democrats and President Trump, strong language, and tough negotiations. However, all of this obscures different analytical tools that political scientists use to examine the politics of policy areas like immigration.
While DACA and Dreamers deals with a small slice of immigration policy, a basic conundrum is why the United States has not been able to engage in comprehensive immigration reform for over two decades despite several tries in the US Congress. This chapter introduces some of the many ways through which political scientists may attempt to answer such a question. Why has it gotten stuck in the policy formulation and adoption stages? What actors are involved, and what do they want out of immigration policy? How does immigration policy compare with other policy areas in terms of achievement or even difficulty? In attempting to answer these questions, political scientists can begin to understand the policy dynamics of immigration specifically and public policy in general.
Looking at the immigration debates of early 2018, most of the attention has been devoted to the roles of the president and Congress. However, other actors are equally involved in the setting and carrying out of policy—in particular, bureaucracies like the Department of Homeland Security, whi.
The President of the USA for kids from chicken! Newspaper for childrenKen Wilson-Max
chicken! is a unique newspaper for children in primary school which bring current affairs into the classroom like never before. Here we explain what happened at the recent US Presidential election.
Looking Ahead to the Next Administration - Energy Regulation Under Either Tru...Marcellus Drilling News
What happens to the regulatory environment for the energy industry, in particular oil and gas, should Donald Trump win the presidency? What if (perish the thought) Hillary Clinton wins? What can we expect under each administration? That was the theme for the comments by Tom Sansonetti, partner with the Holland and Hart law firm, at the Independent Petroleum Association of America (IPAA) 86th Midyear Meeting, held in Colorado Springs in June 2016.
Comments ( add 5) So in what other ways do these budgetary structu.docxclarebernice
Comments ( add 5) So in what other ways do these budgetary structures lead to situations like the debt ceiling and the debates about it? Any thoughts?
Response one pol-06
Recently, the U.S. experienced a government shutdown. Although it was for only a short period of time, the shutdown resulted in consequential disruptions of key services and facility closures, as well the temporary furlough of countless Federal Government employees. The government shutdown was the result of a political impasse in Congress, where the Republican majority did not have sufficient votes in the U.S. Senate to garner the 60 votes required to pass the budget resolution. It passed the House of Representatives with the required votes.
Senate Republicans and Democrats reached a probable compromise related to defense spending, border protection spending and protection for Deferred Action for Child Arrivals (DACA) aliens, with the Republicans focused on the two former and the Democrats focused on the latter. Initially, a bi-partisan Senate agreement was struck, but the President rejected the deal causing the political parties to return to impasse. In this instance, Congress had reached a compromise, but the Executive Branch, specifically the President, chose not to accept the compromise causing the deal to collapse, resulting in the shutdown. Within 72 hours following the shutdown, another compromise was struck to pass a continuing spending resolution to temporarily fund the Federal Government until February 8, 2018, upon which another vote would be required. Partisan politics hard-lines, or hyper-partisanship, significantly reduce paths to compromise and it is the American people who suffer in the end.
Interestingly, however, partisan political positions can reverse over time due to changing circumstances. In 2011 and 2013 during the Obama Administration, Congressional Democrats wanted to raise the U.S. debt ceiling to preclude the national debt from surpassing the limit set by law. When the national debt reaches the debt ceiling, and when expenses exceed revenues, the U.S. Treasury cannot increase its borrowing; it may only fund expense for which there is sufficient available cash. 1 The Republicans, wishing to reduce government spending, and who also held the majority in Congress, opposed increasing the debt ceiling to further their own political agenda to cut government spending. 2 In 2013, Republicans used their vote for the debt ceiling to negotiate entitlement reform impacting the Affordable Care Act 3. President Obama responded by saying that he is not going to “negotiate on jeopardizing the full faith and credit of the United States.”2 The impasse resulted in a lapse in funding and a government shutdown. Ultimately, Republicans succeeded in reducing government spending, but they were unsuccessful in their attempts to cripple the Affordable Care Act. 2
Fast forward to 2018, and the tables are turned. With Republicans in control of both the White House a ...
Comment pol-04 ( add 5)So if the time of the Members gets more and.docxclarebernice
Comment pol-04 ( add 5)So if the time of the Members gets more and more reduced by fundraising duties, does the power shift to the full-time staff? Any thoughts?
Response one pol-04
As we begin our focus on Congress in this class, I find it to be interesting timing. Many of the categories discussed in this week’s lesson are happening right in front of us. I could not help but have examples streaming through my head while reading this week’s lesson and assigned reading. Possible the most interesting category was plebiscitary politics. I say this due to all of the direct contact politicians from Congress are having with the American people. Last night I just began flipping through the news outlets on television and every show had at least one sitting member of congress on the show. Then I searched a few popular political hashtags on twitter and it was filled with congressional members’ accounts. As posed in this week’s lesson, is all of this “camera time” causing things in Congress to be at a stalemate? No more is it the compromising body (Grulke, 2018). I feel that this is an area where things could be genuinely discussed and debated between Congress and constituents, however the constant state of campaigning (which is another category but I believe these two are linked) does not lend the interaction to be genuine and mutually beneficial, rather it is used to maintain and garner more votes. Much like how town hall meetings were used before the age of 24 hour news and social media, politicians have the ability and opportunity to reach out to more people than ever before through these “tools”; I just do not believe they are using them properly, rather just for self-gain.
As I mentioned above, I believe the categories plebiscitary politics and governing as campaigning have become intrinsically linked. The constant state of campaigning by congressional members, specifically in the House of Representatives, means less time actually governing (Grulke, 2018). Utilizing the “tools” mention above in the plebiscitary category, members are always seeking more contributions from donors and making sure they are saying whatever they need to, to achieve more votes; not focused on making the best decisions for the majority or protecting the minority. With the having a two year term cycle for members of the House, the minute they have secured another term they are out campaigning immediately for the next election. That is just ludicrous! I do not believe in “career” politicians, especially in the House of Representatives since the Framer’s intended the House to be comprised of the “common citizen”. Perhaps it is time to impose term limits for members of Congress? You get two years to work to make a difference, that is it; make those two years count! Having term limits would also allow for more citizens to be in Congress, mixing it up (Morgan, 2017). This way there is more diversity working its way through congress, not just attorneys and wealthy business peop ...
The United States is experiencing disruptive politics, as promised b.docxKomlin1
The United States is experiencing disruptive politics, as promised by the Republican Party and President Donald Trump. The Republican Party possesses comfortable majorities in the US House (241/194) and US Senate (52/48), the presidency, a majority of US Supreme Court judges, and 32 state legislatures. With this strong mandate for change offered by the electorate in 2016, Republicans seek to reduce or eliminate tax, regulatory, health care, environmental policies; build a wall along the southern border, "drain the swamp" of lobbyists and insider interests, and more to fulfill campaign promises.
Mr. Trump has brought to the presidency unconventional ideas about governing and the role of government in society. Having registered as both Democrat and Republican at different points in his life, his leadership style has not won over all congressional Republicans. Additionally, with an administration mired in an assortment of controversies surrounding Russian interference in the 2016 elections, the Republican agenda has not moved forward as much as many in the party would like. The Democrats, roundly trounced in the elections (save for the nearly 3 million more popular votes Hillary Clinton won), are playing the role of “loyal opposition” by challenging the new administration, something the Republicans did so well during the Obama years. With political partisanship at record levels—meaning little to no inter-party compromises on issues—stalemate seems to be an apt description of politics in Washington, DC these days.
But isn't some degree of gridlock precisely what the separation of powers with checks and balances promotes? Even when one political party controls the branches of government, institutional limitations on the exercise of power are built into the political system. This was done at the founding of the nation in order to 1) protect wealth, and 2) promote liberty for freemen. The revolution that gave rise to the United States was not a social transforming event; rather, its focus was on establishing a new political order. The new political system created by the Constitution allows for slow, incremental, deliberative change through mechanisms that are more likely to thwart than to embrace change. This may have been an adequate response the post-Revolutionary War environment they found themselves in at the end of the 18th Century, but can it survive the rapid changes upon us today?
Scholars see several disturbing trends in American government on the left and the right that contribute to the disruptions we observe today: the unprecedented use of social media by the president, his appointees, and members of Congress; gerrymandered election districts that produce overly partisan candidates; nearly unfettered money in campaigns; and elected officials who care more for their reelection than the public good. Much of what ails politics is the relatively low level of political participation (roughly 60% in 2016). Political mandates for change in publ.
peer 1November 6th 2018 will be the House of Representatives e.docxbartholomeocoombs
peer 1
November 6
th
2018 will be the House of Representatives elections in the United States where about 435 congressional districts will take on election. This will mark 116
th
United States congress serving the country if won. Republicans evidently has more senators and House of Representatives and this puts them in more advantage positions to win congress election in 2018. Ultimately, democrats are in serious disadvantage and future is not bright for them.
Nevertheless Democrats need 25 seats to defend and that comes from states won by president Trump. Democrats to win back Senate control requires 3 seats net gain and chance of this happening is remotely slim because Republicans number. However, after witnessing Trump and Hilary election makes me realize that anything is possible at the last minute. It is not how you started but finishing the race and winning at the end.
Evidently Republicans has 52 seats of senators while democrats hold only 46 seats which make them defensive of 25 seats. Also 241 seats of House of Representatives belong to Republicans and 194 seats for Democrats. Even with this figures, democrats are still optimistic that history has it that congress seats can be lost in the midterm election. For example in 1934 after Franklin D Roosevelt first election in 1932, Democrats gained 9 seats and republicans gained 8 seats in 2002 following George W bush 2000 presidential election. Bottom line is, anything is possible therefore it is too early to predict the winner or the loser.
Obama care brought some controversy among the political parties because Republicans want it to be replaced. They believe it’s not affordable for middle classes and working class American as opposed to initial plan. Senate majority leader Mitch McConnell made it clear that Obama care will be replaced. Kentucky senator was also adamant that Obama care will be replaced even without cooperation of the Democrats.
President Trump, senate and House of Representatives has Obama care on the top of agenda and they are now cautiously optimistic it’s a done deal replacing Obama care. They see this as a federal government controlling individual healthcare but Obama care on the other hand saw that as helping people getting injured in order to take care of their health. We know that majority of uninsured people don’t seek preventive care until it’s too late leading to careless death.
My honest opinion as a healthcare professional that worked in a hospital for 13 years, insurance coverage is very important. Like old saying, prevention is better than sure. I have personally seen people come through ER with glucose level of 400 and blood pressures of 190/100 making them a walking time bomb wanting to explode. Some people don’t make it alive because it was too late, but some are lucky to live to tell you because they are uninsured and no regular checkup put them in great danger. At the end of the day, if people don’t want Obama care fair enough but let government .
Governing a Divided Nation - Insights about the 2016 U.S. Presidential ElectionMSL
Public affairs and policy experts from Qorvis MSLGROUP have compiled an extensive election coverage and analysis of how the new U.S. President and Congress will move forward after one of the most bitter campaigns in American history.
For more updates, follow @qorvis or reach out to us on Twitter @msl_group.
Similar to 185650 post election-recap-november-2016 (20)
A "File Trademark" is a legal term referring to the registration of a unique symbol, logo, or name used to identify and distinguish products or services. This process provides legal protection, granting exclusive rights to the trademark owner, and helps prevent unauthorized use by competitors.
Visit Now: https://www.tumblr.com/trademark-quick/751620857551634432/ensure-legal-protection-file-your-trademark-with?source=share
In 2020, the Ministry of Home Affairs established a committee led by Prof. (Dr.) Ranbir Singh, former Vice Chancellor of National Law University (NLU), Delhi. This committee was tasked with reviewing the three codes of criminal law. The primary objective of the committee was to propose comprehensive reforms to the country’s criminal laws in a manner that is both principled and effective.
The committee’s focus was on ensuring the safety and security of individuals, communities, and the nation as a whole. Throughout its deliberations, the committee aimed to uphold constitutional values such as justice, dignity, and the intrinsic value of each individual. Their goal was to recommend amendments to the criminal laws that align with these values and priorities.
Subsequently, in February, the committee successfully submitted its recommendations regarding amendments to the criminal law. These recommendations are intended to serve as a foundation for enhancing the current legal framework, promoting safety and security, and upholding the constitutional principles of justice, dignity, and the inherent worth of every individual.
How to Obtain Permanent Residency in the NetherlandsBridgeWest.eu
You can rely on our assistance if you are ready to apply for permanent residency. Find out more at: https://immigration-netherlands.com/obtain-a-permanent-residence-permit-in-the-netherlands/.
1. The election is over. Now what? | November 2016
Prepared By:
Hon. Thomas M. Reynolds, Douglas Dziak,
Sally Vastola and Jodi Richardson
2. Moving Forward: the Trump Administration
Table of Contents
The election is over. Now what?........................................................................................................... 1
Likely issues in the first six months....................................................................................................... 1
Funding the government ........................................................................................................................ 1
Tax reform .................................................................................................................................................. 2
Immigration issues/border control ....................................................................................................... 2
Infrastructure ............................................................................................................................................. 3
Reform of the Affordable Care Act ....................................................................................................... 3
Regulatory Reform ................................................................................................................................... 4
The Supreme Court .................................................................................................................................. 5
Energy .......................................................................................................................................................... 5
The Cabinet .................................................................................................................................................... 5
The Congress ................................................................................................................................................. 6
Senate leadership ....................................................................................................................................... 6
House leadership ....................................................................................................................................... 6
Congressional committees ........................................................................................................................ 6
The U.S. Senate .......................................................................................................................................... 6
The U.S. House of Representatives ....................................................................................................... 8
3. Moving Forward: the Trump Administration
Page 1 of 11
The election is over. Now what?
In what has been described using a variety of adjectives, on November 8, Donald J.
Trump was elected to serve as the 45th
President of the United States. Given the
outcome of the election combined with its surprising conclusions, the 2016 election is
likely to be studied in political science classes for years to come.
Beyond this headline was the news that for the first time since 2004, post-election, the
Legislative and Executive branches of government will be under the control of
Republican leadership. With the start of any new administration comes a change in
control among the Departments and agencies in government. While every new
administration results in change, given President-elect Trump’s lack of elected service,
what his Administration will do, and who will be elevated to serve at the senior levels
in the Trump administration are important questions. The answers to these questions
will provide direction about what to expect over the course of the next four years.
This briefing is designed to describe what issues are likely to be priorities for the
Trump Administration as well as an early look at the leaders President-elect Trump
will appoint and work with in Congress to effect these priorities.
Likely issues in the first six months
1. Funding the government
While garnering much less attention than other campaign issues, the stop-gap fiscal year 2017
(FY17) funding bill expires on December 9. Typically, a new administration and Congress would
want these issues resolved prior to the January 20 inauguration. However, in this instance, a
number of Republican members have suggested that Congress pass another continuing resolution
(CR) that would run through March or April. Recently, House Appropriations Chairman Hal
Rogers has stated that the committee will work on a CR through March 31, yet Senate Democrats
have also indicated a preference to complete the federal spending bills before the end of this
Congress.
BOTTOM LINE: As Congress returns to Washington in late November and early
December, and the new Trump administration has an opportunity to weigh in
with congressional leadership, the fate of the FY17 appropriations bills will be
determined.
4. Moving Forward: the Trump Administration
Page 2 of 11
2. Tax reform
One of the key agenda items for President-elect Trump and congressional leaders is tax reform.1
Speaker of the House Paul Ryan has already released an outline of the House’s tax plan that
provides a high-level outline of how it would accomplish such a plan.2
Senate Majority Leader
McConnell has also expressed interest in passing tax reform. Thus, while tax reform has been
something often discussed, yet rarely moved on, one-party control of the Legislative and Executive
branch of government makes the chances of accomplishing such legislation much higher. One
wildcard is whether Republican lawmakers want to pass such legislation alone, without any
Democratic support, something that is possible using a process known as reconciliation,3
or if they
will want to enlist Democratic support for such legislation. Such support might be tied to the
infrastructure legislation that President-elect Trump has promised, though such legislation has
been met with some skepticism among some Republicans.4
President-elect Trump and the House Republicans have proposed different tax plans, but both
share similar principles. Both budgets would reduce the top tax rate for individuals to 33 % from
the current 39.6%, and reduce the top corporate rate to 15% (Trump) to 20% (House) versus the
current top corporate rate of 35%.
BOTTOM LINE: Given that so many Republicans and the President-elect have
campaigned for and promised tax reform, it is likely that such reforms will be a
significant part of six to twelve months of the new Trump administration. The
most significant question is how much the new Trump administration decides to
negotiate with Democratic members.
3. Immigration issues/border control
President-elect Trump made border control and immigration a cornerstone of his campaign,
including his repeated promise that he would build a wall on the U.S. southern border. While some
in Congress share his views on border enforcement and immigration, congressional views on
immigration have varied over the years. Thus, it is not clear that President Trump will have the
support he needs to enact all of his promised plans. For example, in the past, Congress had already
allocated significant resources to build a border wall, but logistical and engineering issues hindered
its completion. These prior efforts required significant spending, and for President Trump to
complete them, he will need cooperation from Congress.
Still, President Trump is likely to rescind or scale back President Obama’s immigration relief
programs, such as the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals (DACA) and step up internal
enforcement to remove current undocumented aliens. He could also see greater interest in a
1
https://assets.donaldjtrump.com/_landings/contract/O-TRU-102316-Contractv02.pdf.
2
http://abetterway.speaker.gov/.
3
A part of the budget process, reconciliation would permit the Senate to get around its normal
procedural requirements to obtain 60 votes for any bill to completion.
http://www.politico.com/story/2016/10/paul-ryan-budget-congress-229216.
4
http://www.npr.org/2016/11/09/501451368/here-is-what-donald-trump-wants-to-do-in-his-first-100-
days.
5. Moving Forward: the Trump Administration
Page 3 of 11
mandatory employee verification system, though such systems have been discussed in the past
and have been problematic.
President-elect Trump included ending funding to so-called sanctuary cities in his pre-election
commitments, and while this was vague, there has been support in Congress to limit spending to
such cities in the past. In addition, given President-elect Trump’s stated commitment to
immigration reform, we expect to see increasing funding for the Department of Homeland
Security and the Department of Justice to effect this commitment.
BOTTOM LINE: Given that President-elect Trump campaigned so strongly on border
control and immigration reform, it is likely that he will focus considerable
resources on immigration enforcement and perhaps build a wall across the U.S.
southern border and increase internal enforcement and removal. Moreover, it is
likely that President Trump will reverse many of the immigration programs, like
DACA, President Obama instituted, and he may seek to implement a more
stringent employment verification system.
4. Infrastructure
President-elect Trump has long spoken about the need to focus on U.S. infrastructure. During his
victory speech early Wednesday morning, he said, “We are going to fix our inner cities and rebuild
our highways, bridges, tunnels, airports, schools, hospitals,” Trump said. “We’re going to rebuild
our infrastructure—which will become, by the way, second to none—and we will put millions of
our people to work as we rebuild it.”
Nevertheless, Senate Majority Leader McConnell, as well as some conservative groups, expressed
skepticism toward a significant national infrastructure plan.5
Still, infrastructure is one area where
the new administration could find bipartisan support given the continued issues facing U.S.
infrastructure, which has been graded to be in poor condition.6
BOTTOM LINE: Given the bipartisan support for infrastructure, and depending on
President Trump’s commitment to it, a robust infrastructure bill is possible, though
if it is to be bipartisan, such legislation will be more complex than some of his
other agenda items.
5. Reform of the Affordable Care Act
Given that President-elect Trump and the Republican Congressional leadership have proclaimed a
desire to repeal and replace the Affordable Care Act (ACA), it is likely that most, if not all, of the
ACA will be repealed or significantly altered.
Still, President-elect Trump has indicated that he may be open to keeping some ACA provisions,
such as allowing children to stay on their parents’ insurance until the age of 26 and guaranteeing
coverage for pre-existing conditions. It is likely that the repeal and replace effort will take longer
5
http://www.npr.org/2016/11/09/501451368/here-is-what-donald-trump-wants-to-do-in-his-first-100-
days.
6
http://www.infrastructurereportcard.org/.
6. Moving Forward: the Trump Administration
Page 4 of 11
than anticipated. Congressional leaders have discussed using a budget tool, known as
reconciliation, as the means to repeal/amend the ACA. The use of the reconciliation tool, by its
nature and statutory limitations, will limit how much of the ACA can be repealed or changed
without bipartisan support.
In addition, the health care community has undertaken significant investment and training to
implement the ACA; it will take time to unwind these changes and implement any new system,
and feedback from these stakeholders will affect the final product.
BOTTOM LINE: Change is coming to the ACA, but that change, necessary to both
develop the new system as well as transition from the old, will take time. Engaging
in discussions with stakeholders is the key to having one’s voice heard and being a
part of this change
6. Regulatory Reform
President Trump will have significant opportunities to change and eliminate many of the
regulations President Obama put in place. In particular, President-elect Trump has stated on
numerous occasions that he will reverse Obama administration regulations regarding immigration
and energy. Most of these efforts will not require Congressional action. The country may start to
see some of these changes in the earliest days of the new administration when President Trump
reverses, as he has repeatedly promised, President Obama’s executive orders. Other regulatory
changes, undertaken through the rulemaking process, may take longer as the departments and
agencies comply with the Administrative Procedures Act and its requirements.
It is also important to keep in mind that Congress may use its authority under the Congressional
Review Act (CRA), which was enacted in 1996 and requires all final rules be submitted to both
houses of Congress and the Government Accountability Office (GAO) before they can take effect.
Congress has 60 days to introduce a joint resolution of disapproval. While the President would
normally veto such a resolution, given the administration promulgated the rule, the CRA
combined with a change in administrations (in this instance the Obama to Trump administration)
provides an opportunity for Congress to assert its authority under the CRA with a degree of
expected success. A Congressional Research Service note has suggested that any new rules
finalized after May 16, 2016, could be reversed under the CRA, depending on the length of the
Congress’s lame duck session.7
BOTTOM LINE: Significant regulatory changes are likely under the Trump
administration and the new Congress. The depth and breadth of those changes
will take time, but the individuals who are named to cabinet and other positions in
the new administration will play a key role as these regulatory changes are made.
In addition, Congress may assert its authority under the CRA and also work to
reverse some of the Obama administration’s recent rulemakings.
7
See http://src.bna.com/cAk
7. Moving Forward: the Trump Administration
Page 5 of 11
7. The Supreme Court
The death of Justice Antonin Scalia has left an opening on the U.S. Supreme Court. Senate
Majority Leader McConnell has indicated since Justice Scalia’s death that he would wait to hold
hearings until the new President was sworn in. President Trump will now have his opportunity to
nominate Justice Scalia’s replacement, and possibly, others should any justices decide to retire.
This potential shifting of the Supreme Court could provide a longer-lasting legacy than any
particular legislation, yet the country will not see that potential possibly for years to come.
BOTTOM LINE: Candidate Trump published a number of judges that he indicated he
would select from for the Court. That list can be found here:
https://www.donaldjtrump.com/press-releases/donald-j.-trump-adds-to-list-of-
potential-supreme-court-justice-picks. President Trump is expected to nominate a
new justice relatively early, but the Supreme Court is likely to remain in its current
8 justice make-up for the next several months as the nominee works through the
process, competing against legislative and other nominations for time on the
Senate’s calendar.
8. Energy
President-elect Trump has repeatedly stated that he will lift any of President Obama’s executive
orders and regulatory rules that restrict domestic energy production. Moreover, with Republicans
retaining control of both houses of Congress, he is likely to be working with a Congress that
agrees with his views. Based on the public release of information about his transition, it appears he
will take a significantly different view on domestic energy than President Obama. In particular, the
use of coal, nuclear, and natural gas are likely to receive a much more favorable audience versus
renewables under the Trump administration. This point of view is likely to be reflected in
President Trump’s review of existing Obama administration executive orders and regulatory rules.
While President-elect Trump has stated his interest in such administrative changes, it is less clear
what Congress can agree on in the first six months of the administration. In particularly, if
legislative changes are proposed, President Trump will need to work with Congress, and in
particular the Senate, to obtain the necessary bipartisan legislation to make such changes.
BOTTOM LINE: Given President-elect Trump’s statements about increasing
traditional domestic energy sources, we believe that these areas of energy are
likely to see a more favorable regulatory environment, while renewable energy will
likely see a less favorable environment.
The Cabinet
In the next few days and weeks, President-elect Trump will name individuals to serve in his
cabinet. These individuals will assist the new President in effecting change at the Department and
agency level. Moreover, over 4,000 presidential appointments will be made in the days and months
ahead, and many of those will affect significant constituencies.
President-elect Trump’s selection of the Republican National Committee (RNC) Chairman, Reince
Priebus, as his Chief of Staff and Steve Bannon as a chief strategist and senior counselor suggests
that he will continue to rely on the same team that helped him win the election. Mr. Priebus, as
the RNC chair also brings experience in dealing with members of the House and Senate as well as a
grass-roots network that will assist President Trump in navigating Washington.
8. Moving Forward: the Trump Administration
Page 6 of 11
In addition to these picks, a number of individuals have been floated as members of the Trump
cabinet, including various members of Congress and “outsiders.” The cabinet positions will start to
be filled over the course of the next several weeks.
The Congress
In addition to the new administration, congressional leadership will also see changes. Here is what
we expect to see in the House and Senate:
1. Senate Leadership
REPUBLICAN—Senator Mitch McConnell is expected to remain the Senate Majority Leader. In
addition we expect to see Senators John Cornyn continue as Senate Republican Whip, John Thune
as Senate Republican Conference Chairman, John Barrasso as Senate Republican Policy Chairman,
and Roy Blunt as Senate Republican Vice Conference Chairman. A new National Republican
Senatorial Committee Chairman will be selected to replace Chairman Roger Wicker.
DEMOCRATIC—Senator Harry Reid, the current Minority Leader, will retire after this Congress and
Senator Charles Schumer will replace him in that role. Senator Dick Durbin will serve as the
Minority Whip, Senator Patty Murray as Assistant Democratic Leader, Senator Debbie Stabenow
as the Chair of the Democratic Policy and Communications Committee, Senators Elizabeth
Warren, and Mark Warner as Vice Chairs of the Conference, Senator Bernie Sanders as Chair of
Outreach, Senator Joe Manchin will serve as Vice Chair of the Policy and Communications
Committee and Senator Tammy Baldwin as Conference Secretary. Senator Jon Tester, who is in
cycle in 2018, is not expected to continue as the Chair of the Democratic Senatorial Campaign
Committee.
2. House Leadership
REPUBLICAN—Rep. Paul Ryan was re-elected as the Speaker of the House. In addition, Majority
Leader Kevin McCarthy, Majority Whip Steve Scalise, and Republican Conference Chairman
McMorris Rodgers were also re-elected to continue their roles. Rep. Steve Stivers was elected to
chair the National Republican Campaign Committee. .
DEMOCRATIC—While Rep. Nancy Pelosi had been expected to continue as the Democratic Leader,
with her team of Democratic Whip Steny Hoyer and Assistant Democratic Leader James Clyburn ,
there is no guarantee. Democratic leaders postponed leadership elections, at the request of some
Democratic members, from November 15th to November 30th. This delay could give candidates
time to mount an election challenge to the Democratic leadership team, an outcome that bears
monitoring.
Congressional committees
1. The U.S. Senate
AGING: Senator Susan Collins is expected to remain as the Chair. Senator Bob Casey is expected to
replace Senator Claire McCaskill, who is expected to take over Homeland Security and
Governmental Affairs, as Ranking Member.
AGRICULTURE: Senators Pat Roberts and Debbie Stabenow are expected to remain as the Chair and
Ranking Member of the committee.
9. Moving Forward: the Trump Administration
Page 7 of 11
ARMED SERVICES: Senators John McCain and Jack Reed are expected to remain as the Chair and
Ranking Member of the committee.
APPROPRIATIONS: Senator Thad Cochran is expected to remain as the Chair; Senator Patrick Leahy
is expected to replace retiring Senator Barbara Mikulski as the Ranking Member of the committee.
SENATE COMMITTEE ON BANKING, HOUSING, AND URBAN AFFAIRS: Senator Mike Crapo is expected to
replace Senator Richard Shelby, who is term limited, as the Chair. Senator Sherrod Brown is
expected to continue as the Ranking Member.
SENATE BUDGET COMMITTEE: Senators Mike Enzi and Bernie Sanders are expected to remain as the
Chair and Ranking Member of the committee.
COMMERCE COMMITTEE: Senators John Thune and Bill Nelson are expected to remain as the Chair
and Ranking Member of the committee.
ENERGY AND NATURAL RESOURCES: Senators Lisa Murkowski and Maria Cantwell are expected to
remain as the Chair and Ranking Member of the committee.
ENVIRONMENT AND PUBLIC WORKS: The current chair and ranking member will not return. The next
EPW Chair is likely Senator John Barrasso. Shelly Moore Capito could become chair if Senator
Barrasso passes on the opportunity. The Ranking Member is likely to be Senator Tom Carper.
SENATE FINANCE COMMITTEE: Senators Orrin Hatch and Ron Wyden are expected to continue in
their roles as chair and ranking member.
SENATE FOREIGN RELATIONS COMMITTEE: Senators Bob Corker and Ben Cardin are expected to
continue in their roles as chair and ranking member.
SENATE HEALTH, EDUCATION, LABOR & PENSIONS: Senators Lamar Alexander and Patty Murray are
expected to remain as the Chair and Ranking Member.
SENATE HOMELAND SECURITY AND GOVERNMENTAL AFFAIRS COMMITTEE: Senator Ron Johnson is
expected to continue as the Chair. Current Ranking Member, Tom Carper, is likely to claim the
Ranking Member position on the EPW committee, in which case Senator Claire McCaskill would
likely become the Ranking Member.
INDIAN AFFAIRS COMMITTEE: Senator John Barrasso could take the EPW Chair. If so, Senator John
Hoeven could take the chair. Senator Jon Tester is expected to remain as Ranking Member of the
committee.
INTELLIGENCE COMMITTEE: Senator Richard Burr is expected to remain as the Chair, while Senator
Mark Warner may serve as the new Ranking Member, replacing Senator Dianne Feinstein who
moves to Judiciary.
JUDICIARY COMMITTEE: Senator Charles Grassley is expected to remain as the Chair. Senator Dianne
Feinstein will serve as Ranking Member.
RULES AND ADMINISTRATION: Senator Roy Blunt is expected to remain the Chair, while Amy
Klobuchar will serve as Ranking Member.
SMALL BUSINESS AND ENTREPRENEURSHIP: Senator James Risch is in line to succeed retiring Chair
David Vitter. If Senator Risch took another Chair, then Senator Mark Rubio would be in line to
chair this committee. Senator Jeanne Shaheen is expected to remain as Ranking Member.
10. Moving Forward: the Trump Administration
Page 8 of 11
VETERANS AFFAIRS: Senators Johnny Isakson and Richard Blumenthal are expected to remain as the
Chair and Ranking member.
2. The U.S. House of Representatives
APPROPRIATIONS: Reps. Rodney Frelinghuysen or Robert Aderholt are expected to serve as Chair;
Rep. Nita Lowey is expected to continue to serve as the Ranking Member.
ARMED SERVICES: Reps. Mac Thornberry and Adam Smith are expected to continue as Chair and
Ranking Member.
BUDGET COMMITTEE: Rep. David Price is expected to remain as the Chair, while Rep. John Yarmuth
is likely to take over as Ranking Member.
EDUCATION AND WORKFORCE: Rep. Virginia Foxx is expected to take over for John Kline, while Rep.
Bobby Scott is expected to continue to serve as the Ranking Member.
ENERGY AND COMMERCE: Reps. John Shimkus or Greg Walden are expected to become the Chair,
while Rep. Frank Pallone is expected to remain as Ranking Member.
FINANCIAL SERVICES: Reps. Jeb Hensarling and Maxine Waters are expected to continue as Chair
and Ranking Member.
FOREIGN AFFAIRS: Reps. Ed Royce and Eliot Engel are expected to continue as Chair and Ranking
Member.
JUDICIARY: Reps. Bob Goodlatte and John Conyers are expected to continue as Chair and Ranking
Member.
NATURAL RESOURCES: Reps. Rob Bishop and Raul Grijalva are expected to continue as Chair and
Ranking Member.
RULES: Reps. Pete Sessions and Louise Slaughter are expected to continue as Chair and Ranking
Member.
TRANSPORTATION AND INFRASTRUCTURE: Rep. Bill Shuster is expected to remain as Chair and Rep.
Pete DeFazio is expected to remain as Ranking Member.
VETERANS AFFAIRS: Reps. Phil Roe, Gus Bilirakis, Doug Lamborn and Mike Coffman are expected to
contend for the Chair, while Reps. Mark Takano and Tim Walz will contend for the Ranking
Member position.
WAYS AND MEANS: Reps. Kevin Brady and Sandy Levin are expected to continue as Chair and
Ranking Member.