Effective utilisation and allocation of health resources across the Midlands region in New Zealand. Presented by Samuel Mackenzie & Brent Harvey, HealthShare, at HINZ 2014, 12 November 2014, 11.37am, Marlborough Room
2. Midland District Health Boards Shared Services Agency:
Midland Region = Bay of Plenty, Lakes, Tairawhiti, Taranaki,
Waikato
Midland Population ~ 850,000 people
HealthShare Services:
Regional Services Planning and Cooperation
Clinical Networks
Information Systems, Audit, Workforce Development
2
HealthShare
3. Identified that benefit could be gained from:
Working together and sharing best practices
Leveraging resource to mitigate duplication and increase
value-add analytics, with a focus on the one source of the
truth
Reducing reliance on single dimensional and outdated tools
Increasing data and evidence in discussions
3
The need for a regional tool
4. Why Business Intelligence?
Information provided on a spreadsheet is flat and
limiting in terms of interaction, file size, adaptability
etc…
Clinicians want detail, Managers want summaries
BI can create intelligence from raw data files
Healthcare is complex creating need for access to
multiple components/variables to make key decisions
Healthcare data is immense and disparate
4
5. The data
5
We all know
what it is like to
work with big
data
Huge strides
forward have
been made
Still a long way
to go
6. Why QlikView?
BI system of choice to 33,000 clients world wide
Great local and personal support and product knowledge –
Daniel Gargiulo and team @ Acumen BI
Handles and links large and complex data files (for example, 30
million Laboratory records in one QV)
Familiar, based on what you already use and easy to learn
Quick, effective and value for money
User experience is fun, rather than frustrating
Easily understood by both managers and clinicians and has
already demonstrated behavioural change even at this early
stage 6
7. What we have done…
Phase 1:
Creation of key groups to provide information, make
decisions and provide direction for the region with links to
both national and local work. Groups involve both clinical
and a wide range managerial staff from across the
organisations.
Phase 2:
Identification of key project areas where concerns were
raised or opportunities were seen
7
8. What we have done…
Phase 3:
Rapid (one month) conversion and deployment of our
‘routine’ Microsoft Excel files into a multi-faceted set of
reporting Dashboards to simplify quarterly reporting
Phase 4:
Developed practical tools that allow for evidence
informed conversations from strategic to patient level, in
Opthalmology and Orthopaedics
8
9. What we have done…
Phase 3:
Prototyping unique solutions to old problems (such as
Health of Older Persons InterRAI + Payments Data +
Population Demographics, Laboratory, Pharmacy,
Emergency Department activity, Workforce, ESPI
compliance for wait times...)
Demonstrating (meeting with a range of stakeholder
groups to show product and it’s benefits – CEs, COOs,
GMs, Individual DHB units…)
9
10. What we are planning…
Next Steps:
Integration of limited data feeds for five DHBs patient
management systems on a daily and automated basis
Enhancing hardware infrastructure regionally to support
anticipated growth of the software
Continuing to demonstrate and build momentum for
transformational change, with an organic rather than
targeted or planned approach to deploying the software
to support our customers - the DHBs
10
11. Demo 1:
Demo
Impact of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) – an
example of how we can engage with clinicians and managers
Demo 2:
Laboratory – 30 Million Records - an example of how the
software runs across physically large data sets (on a laptop
too)
Demo 3:
Health of Older Persons – Aged Residential Care and Home
Based Support Services linked to InterRAI (an example of our
prototyped regional and project reporting)
11