Microservices vs Monolithic Architecture: Which Approach is Suitable for a Start Up?

Copyright © Biz4Solutions LLC. All Rights Reserved
Biz4solutionsLogoanddesignsaretrademarksofBiz4SolutionsLLC. Alltrademarksandlogos
referenced herein are the properties of their respective owners.
Microservices vs Monolithic Architecture: Which Approach is Suitable
for a Start Up?
Monolithic Architecture is a traditional approach in which the entire app is integrated into a single
unified model. The prime objective is to interconnect all features making them co-dependent on
each other. This model may sound simple, but creates roadblocks in handling bigger and more
complex projects.
Microservices architecture, on the other hand, splits an app into smaller services that are
interconnected and interact with each other with the help of APIs. Every microservice is
independent, loosely coupled, and possesses a distinct hexagonal architecture comprising of
business logic and different adapters. Here, each service is a separate codebase, has its own
database, and can be deployed independently. This approach has gained momentum these days
as modern-day businesses expect more agility in their operations. Some renowned brands using
the microservices approach are Uber, Twitter, AWS, Netflix, and Spotify.
This post explores Monolithic and Microservices architecture in detail, outlines their differences
and provides suggestions based on specific project requirements. A quick read will help you to
pick the best-suited approach for your upcoming software development project.
Monolithic Architecture: Strengths & Weaknesses
Strengths
Monolithic apps perform speedily at the initial stages as they use local calls in place of API calls
throughout the entire network. But, this speed reduces with the expansion of the app. A
monolithic app, being a single solution, rather than a set of separate apps, is easily manageable,

involve much lower development cost, and encounter very few cross-cutting issues initially.
Weaknesses
When the codebase of a monolithic app becomes huge, the IDE slows down, adversely affecting
the developers’ productivity. Moreover, it’s challenging to scale the app, and modifying the
programming language or framework that hampers the app’s functioning. Also, it’s pretty
expensive to migrate to different technology in situations where monolithic architecture is used.
Microservices Architecture: Strengths & Weaknesses
Strengths
Microservice architectures are well organized - each microservice is responsible for carrying out a
particular task, without being concerned about the tasks carried out by the other components.
And, since such services are decoupled, they can be effortlessly reconfigured and recomposed to
fulfill the needs of various microservice applications. For instance, microservices can serve public
API as well as web clients.
Each microservice can be written employing a different technology; for instance, one microservice
can be handled by Java developers while the other can involve DotNet developers. Thus, you have
the flexibility to choose a particular technology for catering to specific business requirements
without having to lock other services with that technology. This helps in optimizing the
performance of crucial functions.
Microservices allows you to auto-scale an application as per the load on the app, promises
speedier deployment, and eases out rolling updates as there aren’t any dependencies between
the services. With this type of architecture, you can execute parallel development by setting up
boundaries between various parts of the system; these boundaries are difficult to violate
resulting in fewer errors.
Weaknesses
Microservices apps consume more memory; involve higher development costs initially; come with
complex requirements regarding the operation, testing, deployment, and management; and need
a greater level of developmental proficiency and expertise.
Microservices vs Monolithic Architecture: Comparison

Here are some major differences between Microservices and Monolithic architecture based on
these crucial parameters.
Architecture
In Monolithic architecture, the app’s UI, database, business logic, front-end, and back-end are
integrated into a single codebase; whereas in microservices architecture, all the aforesaid app
elements are subdivided and operated independently of each other. Likewise, the processes of
testing and deployment are executed under one line in monolithic apps, while in microservices
apps, these processes are scattered across different adapters and databases.
Monolithic architecture is deployed in a traditional format and caters to standard web servers.
For deploying microservices, on the other hand, a plethora of approaches are supported - One
service-One host approach (each service is deployed to one virtual host machine); One Service-
One Container approach (microservices are isolated by docker containers, but resources like
frameworks, libraries, and operating servers are shared); and Serverless deployment (third-party
cloud services host and manage the servers on which the program runs).
Development
Developing a monolithic application is easy if the app is new, but as the app gets bigger
developmental challenges crop up. This is because the huge indivisible database needs the joint
effort of the development team.
Microservices, on the other hand, offer loose coupling and several options to choose from while
picking the tech stack; but the app developers must possess a more profiled knowledge.
However, this structure allows developers to work independently on each component.
Testing
Testing is pretty simple in a monolithic app as a single script is used for testing the whole system

while testing a microservices application becomes complex as every part of the app needs to be
tested separately.
Deployment
Microservices architecture enables continual development and deployment as every service gets
individually implemented. With monolithic architecture, deployment becomes slower.
App Updation
The process of updating a microservices application happens uninterruptedly and doesn’t slow
down the entire system. Contrarily, updating a monolithic app is voluminous and burdensome
and for every update, the entire app has to be redeployed.
Scalability
The bigger the monolithic app the more challenging it becomes to scale the app - for handling
new changes the entire system has to be redeployed. In microservices apps, each part is scaled
independently without downtime and so, involves fewer hassles while carrying out modifications.
Security and Reliability
Monolithic architecture involves a single source code; communication happens within a single
unit, resulting in secure data processing and a simple monitoring procedure. Microservices
architecture, contrarily, involves inter processing between multiple API connections increasing
security threats, and hence, greater security monitoring is needed. However, in monolithic apps,
one bug can hamper the whole system, while in microservices apps, one bug affects only that
specific service and the bug can be topically fixed. Therefore, even when one service fails other
services are not affected.
When should you pick Monolithic Approach?
You intend to develop a Simple App with faster Time-to-market
Monolithic architecture is an ideal choice for building a simple app that doesn’t require
reinventing the wheel and the app is unlikely to scale rapidly. Moreover, developing the
prototype of a simple app will take place at a fast pace leading to quicker time-to-market.
Smaller-sized Team and No prior Experience with Microservices
Start-ups with smaller-sized teams will benefit from the monolithic approach as experience and
expertise in one tech stack will suffice and your team will not have to handle any developmental
complexities. Furthermore, if your team doesn’t have any prior experience of working with
microservices, picking this approach will be a risky business. In such a scenario, it’s better to start
with a monolithic approach and migrate to microservices later on as and when needed.
Your app idea is Novel, Unproven, or the Proof of a Concept

If you have a novel app idea or planning to create a product that is unproven, your application is
likely to evolve with time. Here, a monolithic approach will help in iterating the product speedily.
Similarly, if your intended app is all set to prove a particular concept, you need to learn more
within a short time and monolithic architecture will prove beneficial.
When should you pick Microservices Approach?
Your app is Complex and needs unprecedented Scaling
If you wish to develop a complicated software solution that involves a rich feature set, a
substantial amount of personalization, extensive use of interactivity, a huge amount of business
logic, or needs to be run by various modules; microservices architecture is your ideal pick. Start-
ups who plan to build a highly innovative and revolutionary app that targets a humongous
audience base and comes with heavy scaling requirements are recommended to adopt the
microservices approach.
Need for Isolated Service Delivery
Microservices work better if you need to deliver independent services speedily. However, for this,
you need a sufficient amount of resources as well.
A part of your Platform needs High Efficiency
For instance, your business is intensively processing petabytes of log volume. In such a scenario,
you’ll have to create a service with a super-efficient programming language like C++ whereas the
users’ dashboard can be created in Ruby on Rails.
Effortless Team Extension
If you commence your start-up with microservices architecture, your team will get accustomed to
the idea of developing small services right from the very beginning and the teams will be
segregated by service boundaries. So, later on, you can effortlessly scale up your team as per the
need.
When is it advisable to migrate to Microservices Architecture?
It’s time to migrate to microservices architecture when your monolithic app grows big enough to
create maintainability issues, when your business functions and their boundaries are crystal clear
enough to be converted into individual services, and when your app needs scaling to deal with a
humongous user load.
Example: The popular app Netflix started as a monolithic application. With time, the app
experienced a surge in the demand leading to issues concerning performance and reliability. As
such, the owners migrated their app to the cloud-based microservices architecture.
Consequently, the app got segregated into hundreds of microservices and this approach enabled

boundless expansion and scaling.
Summing Up:
Monolithic architecture as well as microservices architecture comes with its own set of strengths
and challenges. So, when deciding on the most suitable pick for your start-up, you need to first
define the requirements of your software development project. If you plan to develop a
lightweight app and have budgetary constraints, it’s advisable to go with the monolithic
approach. But, if your project is huge with complex requirements or you need to work with
futuristic models like Big data, and you can spend on hiring several cross-functional teams,
microservices is the most viable option.
If you want to adopt microservices or monolithic architecture, but lack the necessary in-house
infrastructure, partner with the distinguished mobile app development company, Biz4Solutions.
We would remain your trusted partner throughout the product lifecycle - from app ideation to
development to maintenance post-deployment. We have helped several clients from diverse
domains across the globe since the last 10+ years to achieve their business objectives.

Microservices vs Monolithic Architecture: Which Approach is Suitable for a Start Up?

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

Similar to Microservices vs Monolithic Architecture: Which Approach is Suitable for a Start Up?

Similar to Microservices vs Monolithic Architecture: Which Approach is Suitable for a Start Up? (20)

More from Shelly Megan

More from Shelly Megan (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Microservices vs Monolithic Architecture: Which Approach is Suitable for a Start Up?