3. MacGregor: has an ezuberent and entusiastic way of speking to the audience; he
speaks with certainty and real fact based knowledge that keeps you attention
for learning and discovering the truth.
4. Although MacGregor has insight and knowledge of his field of study he dose
seem to lose the engagment of the audience form time to time because he is
constanly cheaking his notes, he also seems to look though the audience or
over them when he is addressing them.
Because of this lose of engagment I will have to go with a rating of a 3
5. MacGregor’s notes might have been a double edge sword showing that although
his engagment was weak, his notes he used gave a strong conviction and hold
on the presentation strickly on the knowledge being delivered to the
audience….I see that refrencing notes can help and hurt your presintation
6. MacGregor vs Ken Robinson
Robinson has a more lose and comedic way of apoching
his audience
MacGregor is more dry and straight to the point
Robinson seems to wing it most of the time and uses
antidotes to entertain the audience
MacGregor seems to lose the engagment of the audience
often and needs to refrence notes and slid shows
7. What will help you!
1, keep focused on your audience, don’ t lose them
2, keep your notes and refrences down to a minimum and pre read for
memory purposes
3, use humor when ever possible but stay on track
4, cheak your research, make sure its authentic and acurate