3. Wednesday, January 20, 2016 3
The first known mention of
diabetes symptoms was in 1552 B.C.,
when Hesy-Ra, an Egyptian
physician, documented frequent
urination as a symptom of a
mysterious disease that also caused
emaciation
History of the DiseaseHistory of the Disease
4. Prosthetic, wood & leather âgreat toeâ
found on foot of Egyptian mummy
5. 5
1500 BC ,Indian hindu discovered that
ants sinks in the urine of kings and rich
people and found their urine is sweety .
150 AD, the Greek physician Arateus
described what we now call diabetes as
"the melting down of flesh and limbs into
urine." diabetesâ means â
to pass through like siphon. And
mellitus means sweeten like honey .
âsweet flowâ in ancient Greek as
opposed to diabetes insipidus (which
means âtastelessâ in Latin)
6. AvicennaAvicenna, a famous Arab physician, described the, a famous Arab physician, described the
complications of the diseasecomplications of the disease and how itand how it
progressedprogressed
French physician BouchardatFrench physician Bouchardat recognized therecognized the
importance of calorie intakeimportance of calorie intake in the 1870sin the 1870s
http://www.pre-renaissance.com/images/avicenna2.jpghttp://www.pre-renaissance.com/images/avicenna2.jpg
7. Wednesday, January 20, 2016 7
The American Diabetes Association
(ADA) reports that in 1910, medical
professionals took the first steps
toward discovering a cause and
treatment mode for diabetes. Edward
Albert Sharpey-Shafer announced that
the pancreas of a diabetes patient was
unable to produce what he termed
âinsulin,â a chemical the body uses to
break down sugar. Thus, excess sugar
ended up in the urine. Physicians
promoted a fasting diet combined with
regular exercise to combat the
disorder. But victems inevitably die.
Edward Albert Sharpey-Shafer
8. Paul Langerhans identified the importance of the pancreas in the
early 19th
century and discovered the islets of Langerhans, a group
of cells that would later be known to produce insulin
(Latin ward of islets)
9. 9
Paul Langerhans
Berlin in 1869
Oscar Minkowski
1889, Polish-German
Nicolae Paulescu
1916, a Romanian professor
Frederick BantingMaclodChales Best
10. 10
. In 1921, scientists experimenting
with dogs had a breakthrough in
reversing the effects of diabetes.
Two Canadian researchers
Frederick Grant Banting and Charles Herbert Best
successfully extracted insulin from
healthy dogs. They then injected it
into diabetic dogs to improve their
condition.
11. ďŽ In Jan, 1922, Banting and Best injected a 14-
year-old "charityâ patient who weighed 64 lb
with 7.5 ml of a "thick brown muckâ in each
buttock
ďŽ Abscesses developed and he became more
acutely ill
ďŽ However, his blood glucose had dropped
enough to continue refining what was called
"iletinâ insulin
ďŽ 6 weeks later, a refined extract caused his
blood glucose to fall from 520 to 120 mg/dL in
24 hours
ďŽ Leonard lived a relatively healthy life for 13
years before dying of pneumonia (no Rx then)
at 27
12. Wednesday, January 20, 2016 12
Herbert Boyer 1977
Synthesis of humaline
Dorothy Crowfoot 1969 ,3ry
structure
1977 Rosalyn
radioimmunoassay for insulin
Frederick Sanger
1958 british molecular
biologist, 1ry structure
13. ⢠1922 Banting and Best use bovine insulin extract on human
⢠1923 Lilly produces commercial quantities of bovine insulin
⢠1936 Hagedorn discovers that adding protamine to insulin prolongs the effect of
insulin
⢠1946 Nordisk formulates IsophaneŽ porcine insulin aka Neutral Protamine
Hagedorn or NPH insulin
⢠1950 Nordisk markets NPH insulin
⢠1953 Novo formulates LenteŽ porcine and bovine insulins by adding zinc for
longer lasting insulin
⢠1978 Genentech produces human insulin in Escheria coli bacteria using
recombinant DNA
⢠1981 Novo Nordisk chemically and enzymatically converts bovine to human
insulin
⢠1982 Genentech human insulin approved
⢠1983 Lilly produces recombinant human insulin, HumulinŽ
⢠1988 Novo Nordisk produces recombinant human insulin
⢠1996 Lilly HumalogŽ "lyspro" insulin analogue approved
⢠2003 Aventis LantusŽ "glargine" insulin analogue approved in USA
⢠2006 Novo Nordisk's "Detemir" approved in USA
⢠2007, the currently available type (Exubera)
16. HISTORY OF INSULIN
PUMPS
o 1960âs ,First introduced by a Physician called
Dr. Arnold Kadish.
o 1974, First non-portable computer controlled
insulin pump.
o 1978, First commercially available portable
insulin pump called the Autosyringe âBig Blue Brickâ.
o 1983, Medtronic releases the first small
programmable insulin
pump into the market.
23. Effect of insulin on the
glucose permeability of cells
Insulin binds to
receptors on cell
surface membranes
intracellular
chemical
signal
signal triggers the
fusion of carrier-
containing vesicles
with the surface
membrane
The additional
carriers increase
glucose
permeability
glucose carrier for
facilitated diffusion
plasma
membrane
26. Glucose to glycogenGlycogen to glucose
non-carbohydrates to glucose
detected by the
alpha cells
detected by the
beta cells
glucagon secretion insulin secretion
release of fatty
acids from
adipose tissue
uptake of
glucose for
fatty acid
synthesis
increased
permeability of
body cells to glucose
Dual Hormonal
Control achieves
Glucose Homeostasis
43. Insulin Resistance and β-cell dysfunction produce
Hyperglycemia in Type 2 diabetes
Pancreatic β-cell Insulin resistance
Hyperglycemia
β-cell dysfunction
Adipose Tissue
Decreased glucose transport
(GLUT 4)
Increased
lipolysis
+ -
Low plasma
insulin
Increased glucose output
Adipocytokines
Elevated
plasma FFA
44. Insulin Deficiency: Impaired β-Cell Function
Normal versus Type 2 Diabetes
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16
Time (hours)
SecretedInsulin
(ng/ml/islet)
18
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
11.1 mmol/L (200 mg/dL) Glucose
Normal
Diabetes
Grodsky GM , Diabetes 1989; 38:673
45. Muller WA, et al. N Engl J Med. 1970;283:109-115.
80
100
120
140
160
â60 0 60 120 180 240
Time (min)
Glucagon(pg/mL)
0
50
100
150
â60 0 60 120 180 240
Insulin(ÎźU/mL)
NGT NGT
Islet dysfunction:
Inappropriate Insulin and Glucagon
Responses to Glucose in Patients With T2DM
Insulin Glucagon
46. Muller WA, et al. N Engl J Med. 1970;283:109-115.
80
100
120
140
160
â60 0 60 120 180 240
Time (min)
Glucagon(pg/mL)
0
50
100
150
â60 0 60 120 180 240
Insulin(ÎźU/mL)
NGT
T2DM
NGT
T2DM
Insulin Glucagon
Islet dysfunction:
Inappropriate Insulin and Glucagon
Responses to Glucose in Patients With T2DM
47. β-cellFunction
(%ofnormalbyHOMA)
Adapted from Holman RR. Diab Res Clin Pract. 1998;40(suppl):S21-S25.
Years
0
20
40
60
80
100
â10 â9 â8 â7 â6 â5 â4 â3 â2 â1 0 1 2 3 4 5 6
Time of diagnosis
?
HOMA = homeostasis model assessment
Decline of β-Cell Function in the UKPDS Illustrates
Progressive Nature of Diabetes
48. Multiple factors may drive progressive
β-cell dysfunction
β-cell
Hyperglycemia
âglucotoxicityâ
Amyloid (IAPP) deposition
Elevated FFA
âlipotoxicityâ
Other factors:
Genetic
Age
AGEs
Insulin
Resistance
ER Stress
ER StressER Stress
o Oxidative stress expressed in B-
cell mitochondrial dysfunction
o Incretin dysfunction
decreased glucagon-like peptide-1
(GLP-1) levels with intact
response
normal or elevated glucose-dependent
insulinotropic peptide (GIP) levels
with decreased response
57. ⢠Type 1 diabetes
â β-cell destruction
⢠Type 2 diabetes
â Progressive insulin secretory defect
⢠Other specific types of diabetes
â Genetic defects in β-cell function,
insulin action
â Diseases of the exocrine pancreas
â Drug- or chemical-induced
⢠Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM)
ADA. 2. Classification and Diagnosis. Diabetes Care 2015;38(suppl 1):S8
58. ⢠A complete medical evaluation should be performed to
â Classify the diabetes
⢠Detect presence of diabetes complications
⢠Review previous treatment, risk factor control in patients with established diabetes
⢠Assist in formulating a management plan
⢠Provide a basis for continuing care
⢠Perform laboratory tests necessary to evaluate each patientâs
medical condition
Screening Recommendation
⢠Consider screening those with type 1 diabetes for other
autoimmune diseases (thyroid, vitamin B12 deficiency, celiac) as
appropriate B
Diabetes Care: Initial EvaluationDiabetes Care: Initial Evaluation
ADA. 3. Initial Evaluation and Diabetes Management Planning. Diabetes Care 2015;38(suppl 1):S17
59. Medical history (1)
⢠Age and characteristics of onset of diabetes (e.g., DKA, asymptomatic laboratory finding
⢠Eating patterns, physical activity habits, nutritional status, and weight history; growth and
development in children and adolescents
⢠Diabetes education history
⢠Review of previous treatment regimens and response to therapy (A1C records)
Components of the ComprehensiveComponents of the Comprehensive
Diabetes EvaluationDiabetes Evaluation
Medical history (2)
⢠Current treatment of diabetes, including medications, adherence and barriers thereto, meal plan,
physical activity patterns, readiness for behavior change
⢠Results of glucose monitoring, patientâs use of data
⢠DKA frequency, severity, cause
⢠Hypoglycemic episodes
â Hypoglycemic awareness
â Any severe hypoglycemia: frequency, cause
60. Components of the ComprehensiveComponents of the Comprehensive
Diabetes EvaluationDiabetes Evaluation
Physical examination (1)
⢠Height, weight, BMI
⢠Blood pressure determination, including orthostatic measurements when
indicated
⢠Fundoscopic examination
⢠Thyroid palpation
⢠Skin examination (for acanthosis nigricans and insulin injection sites)
ADA. 3. Initial Evaluation and Diabetes Management Planning. Diabetes Care 2015;38(suppl 1):S18
61. Components of the ComprehensiveComponents of the Comprehensive
Diabetes Evaluation (6)Diabetes Evaluation (6)
Laboratory evaluation
⢠A1C, if results not available within past 3 months
⢠If not performed/available within past year
â Fasting lipid profile, including total, LDL, and HDL cholesterol and triglycerides
â Liver function tests
â Test for urine albumin excretion with spot urine albumin-to-creatinine ratio
â Serum creatinine and calculated GFR
â TSH in type 1 diabetes, dyslipidemia, or women over age 50 years
ADA. 3. Initial Evaluation and Diabetes Management Planning. Diabetes Care 2015;38(suppl 1):S18
62.
63. Diagnostic Criteria for Prediabetes
and Diabetes in Nonpregnant Adults
63
Normal High Risk for Diabetes Diabetes
FPG <100 mg/dL
IFG
FPG âĽ100-125 mg/dL
FPG âĽ126 mg/dL
2-h PG <140 mg/dL
IGT
2-h PG âĽ140-199 mg/dL
2-h PG âĽ200 mg/dL
Random PG âĽ200 mg/dL +
symptoms*
A1C <5.5%
5.5 to 6.4%
For screening of prediabetesâ
âĽ6.5%
SecondaryâĄ
*Polydipsia (frequent thirst), polyuria (frequent urination), polyphagia (extreme hunger), blurred
vision, weakness, unexplained weight loss.
â
A1C should be used only for screening prediabetes. The diagnosis of prediabetes, which may
manifest as either IFG or IGT, should be confirmed with glucose testing.
âĄ
Glucose criteria are preferred for the diagnosis of DM. In all cases, the diagnosis should be
confirmed on a separate day by repeating the glucose or A1C testing. When A1C is used for
diagnosis, follow-up glucose testing should be done when possible to help manage DM.
FPG, fasting plasma glucose; IFG, impaired fasting glucose; IGT, impaired glucose tolerance; PG, plasma glucose.
Q1. How is diabetes screened and diagnosed?
64. Diagnostic Criteria for
Gestational Diabetes
Test Screen at 24-28 weeks gestation
FPG, mg/dL >92
1-h PG*, mg/dL âĽ180
2-h PG*, mg/dL âĽ153
*Measured with an OGTT performed 2 hours after 75-g oral glucose load.
FPG, fasting plasma glucose; OGTT, oral glucose tolerance test; PG, plasma glucose.
Q1. How is diabetes screened and diagnosed?
64
65.
66.
67. Diagnosing Type 1 Diabetes
(T1D)
⢠Usually characterized by insulin deficiency and
dependency
â Document levels of insulin and C-peptide
⢠Test for autoantibodies*
â Insulin
â Glutamic acid decarboxylase
â Pancreatic islet β cells (tyrosine phosphatase IA-2)
â Zinc transporter (ZnT8)
⢠May occur in overweight or obese as well as
lean individuals
Q1. How is diabetes screened and diagnosed?
*Evidence of autoimmunity may be absent in idiopathic T1D. 67
68. Criteria for Screening for T2D and
Prediabetes in Asymptomatic Adults
68
*At-risk BMI may be lower in some ethnic groups; consider using waist circumference.
â
Obstructive sleep apnea, chronic sleep deprivation, and night shift occupations.
BMI = body mass index; BP = blood pressure; CVD=cardiovascular disease; HDL-C = high density lipoprotein cholesterol; IFG = impaired fasting
glucose; IGT = impaired glucose tolerance; NAFLD = nonalcoholic fatty liver disease; PCOS = polycystic ovary syndrome; T2D, type 2 diabetes.
Q1. How is diabetes screened and diagnosed?
69.
70.
71. Outpatient Glucose Targets for
Nonpregnant Adults
Parameter Treatment Goal
A1C, %
Individualize on the basis of age, comorbidities,
duration of disease, and hypoglycemia risk:
â˘In general, â¤6.5 for most*
â˘Closer to normal for healthy
â˘Less stringent for âless healthyâ
FPG, mg/dL <110
2-Hour PPG, mg/dL <140
71
Q3. What are glycemic treatment goals of DM?
FPG = fasting plasma glucose; PPG = postprandial glucose.
*Provided target can be safely achieved.
72. Targets for glycemic (blood sugar) control in most non-pregnant adults
ADA AACE
A1c (%) <7* â¤6.5
Fasting (preprandial) plasma
glucose 70-130 mg/dL <110 mg/dL
Postprandial (after meal)
plasma glucose <180 mg/dL <140 mg/dL
⢠American Diabetes Association. Diabetes Care. 2012;35(suppl 1)
⢠https://www.aace.com/sites/default/files/DMGuidelinesCCP.pdf 2011
*<6 for certain individuals
Goals of Glucose Management
73. Outpatient Glucose Targets for
Pregnant Women
Condition Treatment Goal
Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM)
Preprandial glucose, mg/dL â¤95*
1-Hour PPG, mg/dL â¤140*
2-Hour PPG, mg/dL â¤120*
Preexisting T1D or T2D
Premeal, bedtime, and overnight glucose, mg/dL 60-99*
Peak PPG, mg/dL 100-129*
A1C â¤6.0%*
73FPG = fasting plasma glucose; PPG = postprandial glucose.
*Provided target can be safely achieved.
Q17. How should diabetes in pregnancy be managed?
78. Medical and Surgical Interventions
Shown to Delay or Prevent T2D
78
T2D, type 2 diabetes.
1. DPP Research Group. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:393-403. 2. STOP-NIDDM Trial Research Group. Lancet. 2002;359:2072-2077.
3. Defronzo RA, et al. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:1104-15. 4. DREAM Trial Investigators. Lancet. 2006;368:1096-1105.
5. Torgerson JS, et al. Diabetes Care. 2004;27:155-161. 6. Garvey WT, et al. Diabetes Care. 2014;37:912-921.
7. Sjostrom L, et al. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:2683-2693.
Q2. How is prediabetes managed?
Intervention Follow-up Period
Reduction in Risk of T2D
(P value vs placebo)
Antihyperglycemic agents
Metformin1
2.8 years 31% (P<0.001)
Acarbose2
3.3 years 25% (P=0.0015)
Pioglitazone3
2.4 years 72% (P<0.001)
Rosiglitazone4
3.0 years 60% (P<0.0001)
Weight loss interventions
Orlistat5
4 years 37% (P=0.0032)
Phentermine/topiramate6
2 years 79% (P<0.05)
Bariatric surgery7
10 years 75% (P<0.001)
Lifestyle modification should be used with all pharmacologic or surgical interventions.
79. Approach to the ManagementApproach to the Management
of Hyperglycemiaof Hyperglycemia
ADA. 6. Glycemic Targets. Diabetes Care 2015;38(suppl 1):S37. Figure 6.1; adapted with
permission from Inzucchi SE, et al. Diabetes Care, 2015;38:140-149
81. Management of DM
T1D T2D
⢠Use MDI or CSII insulin
â In children younger than 4
years, bolus insulin may be
given after, rather than before,
meals due to variable
carbohydrate intake
â Higher insulin-to-
carbohydrate ratios may be
needed during puberty
â Pubescent girls may require
20% to 50% increases in
insulin dose during menstrual
periods
⢠Lifestyle modification is first-
line therapy
⢠Metformin, alone or in
combination with insulin, is
approved by the FDA to treat
T2D in pediatric patients
⢠Rosiglitazone and glimepiride
have also been studied in
pediatric patients with T2D
81
Q16. How is a comprehensive care plan established in children and
adolescents?
87. ADA. 7. Approaches to Glycemic Treatment. Diabetes Care 2015;38(suppl 1):S43. Figure 7.1;
adapted with permission from Inzucchi SE, et al. Diabetes Care, 2015;38:140-149
88. ADA. 7. Approaches to Glycemic Treatment. Diabetes Care 2015;38(suppl 1):S46. Figure 7.2; adapted with permission from Inzucchi SE,
94. âNicheâ Drugs
⢠Colesevelam (Welchol)
- adjunct to lower A1c and LDL
- limited efficacy, cost
⢠Repaglinide (Prandin), Nateglinide (Starlix)
- may replace SU if sulfa allergy
- Prandin may be useful in CKD
⢠Acarbose (Precose), Miglitol (Glyset)
- limited efficacy, GI intolerance, cost
⢠Bromocriptine (Cycloset)
- limited efficacy? Will be marketed
⢠Salsalate
-older NSAID, may lower blood sugar, no
indication yet
95. Pramlintide-Synthetic Amylin
(Symlin)
⢠Amylin secreted by normal pancreas along
with insulin to regulate blood glucose
⢠Enhances Postprandial control. Used in
Type 1 and Type 2 patients
⢠Used as adjunct to insulin
⢠Available in pen injector
⢠Possible significant hypoglycemia
98. Beta-cell function declines as
diabetes progresses
Beta-cell
function (%)
Beta-cell decline exceeds 50%
by time of diagnosis
4-4-12 -8 0 8 12
0
50
100
75
25 Type 2 Diabetes
IGT
Years from diagnosis
Postprandial
Hyperglycemia
Diagnosis
Insulin
initiation
Beta-cell function decline over time
bovitz H. Diabetes Rev 1999;7:139-153.
106. What is your current HbA1c?
8%
What is your target HbA1c?
Less than 7%
Current Diabetes Control: HbA1c or A1C
www.TuDiabetes.org
107.
108. Insulin therapyInsulin therapy
⢠Insulin therapy aims to replicate the normal physiological
insulin response
⢠Insulin regimens should be individualized
â type of diabetes
â willingness to inject
â lifestyle
â blood glucose monitoring
â age
â dexterity
â glycaemic targets
109. Goals
Multiple Insulin Injection Therapy
I
N
S
U
L
I
N
I
N
J
E
C
T
I
O
N
Clinical Goals:
Elimination of ketosis.
Elimination of hyperglycemia and itâs symptoms.
Prevention of chronic complications.
Additional Goals:
Maintaining desirable weight.
Maintaining normal growth and sexual maturation.
Maintaining psychosocial well-being.
Achieving normal fertility and pregnancy.
Sustaining normal family and sexual life.
Control Goals:
HbA1c <7%.
Pre-meal SMBG 80-120 mg/dl (4.4-6.7 mmol/l).
Bed time SMBG 100-140 mg/dl (5.6-7.8 mmol/l).
No ketonuria.
Mean blood glucose level 120-160 mg/dl (6.7-8.9 mmol/l).
110. Address Concerns With Starting Insulin Therapy
1. Perceived failure to manage
diabetes (âMy diabetes is
getting worseâ)
2. Fear of injections (âThe
injection will hurtâ)
3. Taking insulin is too
complicated (âI am too busy
already; I donât know I can fit
this inâ)
4. Insulin will cause too many
lifestyle changes (âUsing
insulin is a hassle and will
change my lifeâ)
5. Insulin causes serious
complications (âIf I start insulin, I
might go blindâ)
6. Fear of hypoglycemia (âI am
afraid of having an insulin
reactionâ)
7. Insulin causes weight gain (âI
donât want to gain weight, I am
trying to lose weightâ)
8. Insulin therapy is expensive âI
am already taking a lot of
medications; how can I afford to
buy moreâ)
112. Chemically, insulin is a small, simple protein. It consists of
51 amino acid, 30 of which constitute one polypeptide
chain, and 21 of which comprise a second chain. The two
chains are linked by a disulfide bond.
Source: Chance, R. and Frank B. - Research, development, production and safety of Biosynthetic Human Insulin.
113. ⢠Type 1 diabetes
⢠Women with diabetes who
become pregnant or are
breastfeeding
⢠Transiently in type 2
diabetes in special
situations
⢠In type 2 diabetes,
inadequately controlled on
glucose-lowering medicines
(secondary failure)
114.
115. Indications for Insulin Use in Type 2 Diabetes
o Pregnancy (preferably prior to pregnancy)
o Acute illness requiring hospitalization
o Perioperative/intensive care unit setting
o Postmyocardial infarction
o High-dose glucocorticoid therapy
o Inability to tolerate or contraindication to oral antiglycemic agents
o Newly diagnosed type 2 diabetes with significantly elevated
blood glucose levels (pts with severe symptoms or DKA)
o Patient no longer achieving therapeutic goals on combination
antiglycemic therapy
116. Advantages of Insulin TherapyAdvantages of Insulin Therapy
⢠Oldest of the currently available
medications, has the most clinical
experience
⢠Most effective of the diabetes medications
in lowering glycemia
â Can decrease any level of elevated HbA1c
â No maximum dose of insulin beyond which a
therapeutic effect will not occur
⢠Beneficial effects on triglyceride and
HDL cholesterol levels Nathan DM et al. Diabetes Care 2006;29(8):1963-72.
117. Disadvantages of Insulin TherapyDisadvantages of Insulin Therapy
⢠Weight gain ~ 2-4 kg
â May adversely affect cardiovascular health
⢠Hypoglycemia
â However, rates of severe hypoglycemia in
patients with type 2 diabetes are lowâŚ
ď§ Type 1 DM: 61 events per 100 patient-yearsType 1 DM: 61 events per 100 patient-years
ď§ Type 2 DM: 1-3 events per 100 patient-yearsType 2 DM: 1-3 events per 100 patient-years
Nathan DM et al. Diabetes Care 2006;29(8):1963-72.
118. Balancing Good Glycemic Control withBalancing Good Glycemic Control with
a Low Risk of Hypoglycemiaa Low Risk of HypoglycemiaâŚâŚ
Hypoglycemia
Glycemic
control
119. Types of Insulin
⢠Beef
⢠Porcine
⢠Human Insulin
â Regular
â NPH (Neutral Protamine Hagedorn)
â 70/30
⢠Insulin Analogues
â Ultra Short Acting
â Long Acting
121. ⢠The amino acid sequence for insulin is highly conserved in
mammals.
⢠Porcine insulin has only a single amino acid variation from the
human variety
⢠Bovine insulin varies by three amino acids.
⢠Both are active on the human receptor with approximately the
same strength.
⢠Non human insulins can cause allergic reactions in some
people, and human insulin replaced animal analogues
122. Stage 1 Insulin was extracted from the glands of
cows and pigs. (1920s)
Stage 2 Convert pig insulin into human insulin by
removing the one amino acid that distinguishes them
and replacing it with the human version.
124. Amino Acid Substitutons
A- chain
Position
B- chain Position
Source/
Type
A21 B3 B28 B29 B30 B31
And
B32
Human Asn Asn Pro Lys Thr
Aspart Asn Aspartic
acid
Lys Thr
Lispro Asn Lys Pro Thr
Glulisine Asn Lys Pro Glu Thr
Glargine Gly Pro Lys Thr Arg
Detemir Lys Myristic
acid
long-acting
125. Relative Insulin
Deficiency
Relative Insulin
Deficiency
Pre-diabetes and
Type 2 Diabetes
Pre-diabetes and
Type 2 Diabetes
Insulin
Resistance
Insulin
Resistance
Incretin DysfunctionIncretin Dysfunction
Insulin
Deficiency
Insulin
Deficiency
Type 1 DiabetesType 1 Diabetes
Critical role in both Type 1 and Type 2 diabetes
⢠Greatest potency of available therapies
⢠Demonstrated benefit â multiple clinical trials
126. Principles of Insulin Therapy
in T1D
⢠Starting dose based on weight
â Range: 0.4-0.5 units/kg per day
⢠Daily dosing
â Basal
⢠40% to 50% TDI
⢠Given as single injection of basal analog or 2 injections of NPH
per day
â Prandial
⢠50% to 60% of TDI in divided doses given 15 min before each
meal
⢠Each dose determined by estimating carbohydrate content of meal
⢠Higher TDI needed for obese patients, those with
sedentary lifestyles, and during puberty
Q5. How should glycemia in T1D be managed?
TDI = total daily insulin. 127
127. Insulin Regimens
⢠Insulin is required for survival in T1D
⢠Physiologic regimens using insulin analogs
should be used for most patients
128
Q5. How should glycemia in T1D be managed?
128. Pharmacokinetics of Insulin
129
* Exhibits a peak at higher dosages.
â Dose-dependent.
NPH, Neutral Protamine Hagedorn.
Moghissi E et al. Endocr Pract. 2013;19:526-535. Humulin R U-500 (concentrated) insulin prescribing information. Indianapolis: Lilly USA, LLC.
Q5. How should glycemia in T1D be managed?
134. Rates of Hypoglycemia for PremixedRates of Hypoglycemia for Premixed
vs. Long-Acting Insulin + OADvs. Long-Acting Insulin + OAD
Adapted from Janka et al. Diabetes Care 2005;28:254-9.
Mean number of confirmed hypoglycemic events
per patient-year in a 28-week study
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
Symptomatic Nocturnal Severe
Premixed insulin
Insulin glargine + OADs
5.73
2.62
1.04
0.51
0.05 0.00
Eventsperpatient-year
p=0.0009
p=0.0449 p=0.0702
136. Regular insulin
⢠Clear solution at neutral pH
⢠0.4% zinc added-hexamers
⢠Phenol or cresol-prevent growth of
microorganisms
⢠Onset of action within 15-30 min after SC
⢠max activity-120 -150 min
⢠Action -6-8 hrs
⢠Insulin to be given 30-40 min prior to meals
137. NPH or isophane insulin
⢠At hagedorn university in 1940.
⢠Protamine added in 1:6 ratio to regular insulin
⢠Phosphate buffer for neutral ph
⢠Zinc ,cresol.
⢠Peak of action at 5-7 hrs
⢠Action lasts for 12-15 hrs.
⢠Bed time to control FBS.
⢠Cloudy.
138. Lente insulin
⢠Zinc in amounts 10 times to NPH
⢠Acetate as buffer
⢠Insoluble zinc insulin complexes
⢠Semilente---amorphous,biphasic absorption
⢠Ultralenteâlong acting crystalline suspension
⢠Canât be mixed with regular insulin.
140. Rapidly acting insulinsâ
insulin analogues
⢠Analogous to keep insulin in monomeric form
⢠Only change in aminoacid sequence
at a particular point.
⢠Action starts within 15 min after SC injection.
⢠Peaks at 60-90 min
⢠Over by 4 hrs
⢠Post prandial excursions curtailed
⢠No delayed hypoglycemia.
142. Glu
Thr
Lys
Thr
Tyr Phe Phe Gly Arg
Glu
Gly
Cys
Val
Le
u Tyr
Leu
Ala
Val
Leu
His
Ser
Gly
CysLeuHisGlnAsnValPheB1
Asn Cys
Tyr
Asn
Glu
Leu
Gln
Tyr
Leu
SerCysIleSerThrCys
Cys
Gln
Glu
Val
Ile
Gly
A21
B28B30
Asp
Pro
Asp
144. Long acting insulin
analogues
⢠Steady basal insulin levels
⢠Glargine âisoelectric at 7.4
⢠Clear and soluble at acidic ph
⢠Ppt after SC injection
⢠Action >24 hrs
⢠Detemirâfatty acid chain attached to it.
145. Vajo & Duckworth, 2000. Pharmacological Reviews, 52:1-9; Heinemann L et al. Diabetes Care 2000;23:644â649;
Hilgenfeld R et al. Diabetologia 1992;35[Suppl 1]:A193
These changes cause a shift in the isoelectric point from 5.4 in native insulin to 7.0 in
insulin glargine
NH2
COOHNH2
COOH
S
S S
S
S
A21[Gly]
B-chain
A-chain
S
B31[Arg]
B32[Arg]
Arg
extension
Asp
subtitution
⢠Formulated at acid pHâ4.0 , Hexamers at pH-7.4
155. Wash Hands Roll Bottle
Invert
bottle
Fill syringe with air
Withdraw cloudy
insulin
156. ⢠Possible sites to inject insulin for Diabetes mellitus:
Abdomen
⢠quick insulin
absorption
Upper thigh + buttocks
⢠slow insulin
absorption
157. ⢠Possible injections sites:
â˘Change injection sites on a
regular basis by rotating site
â˘Minimum distance of 3 cm
between two injection sites
â˘Minimum distance of 3 cm to
the navel
158. Strength of insulin
⢠40 U /ml âmost widely used
⢠WHOâall insulin across the globe to be U 100.
⢠Storage
⢠Refrigerated
⢠<2 and >30 °C
⢠Excess agitation avoided
⢠Used for > 1 month âmay lose potency.
⢠Away from sunlight.
161. Insulin dose calculation
⢠Calculate total daily insulin TDI
⢠0.5 *WEIGHT (KG) or sum of current doses
⢠Exâ60 kg---30U.
⢠Total meal time insulinâlispro,aspart,regular
⢠60% 0f TDI
⢠18U-----three divided dosesâbreakfast,lunch.dinner
⢠Total basal insulinâNPH,glargine,ultrlente
⢠40% of TDI
⢠12U---bed time insulin
162. If most AM fasting BG
>120 mg/dL
(>6.7 mmol/L)
Titrate until fasting glucose at target BG
⢠Use IDC regimen or increase 2 u
[or 4 u if FBG >180 mg/dl or 10 mmol/L] every 3-
7 days
⢠If dose reaches ~0.5 u/kg body weight, consider
adding mealtime insulin
If most AM fasting BG
<120 mg/dL
(<6.7 mmol/L) and
A1C remains above target
Test pre supper and bedtime
(or 2-hour post supper) and consider need for
mealtime insulin
163. If most BG >200 mg/dL (11.1
mmol/L)
Increase total insulin by 0.1 units/kg
Distribute equally between doses
If most BG <200 mg/dL (11.1
mmol/L)
Use titration guide to adjust
AM BG: adjust pre-dinner insulin dose
Pre-dinner BG: adjust pre-breakfast insulin
Adjust premixed insulin (RA 25/30% + BI 75/70%) based on the pre-breakfast (AM)
and pre-dinner BG
Mazze R, et al. Staged Diabetes Management Adult Quick Guide, 5th
Edition Revised, 2010
International Diabetes Center
164. If most BG >200 mg/dL
(11.1 mmol/L)
Increase total insulin by 0.1 units/kg
Add half to background
Distribute remaining half between mealtime doses
If most BG <200 mg/dL
(11.1 mmol/L)
Use titration guide to adjust:
⢠AM BG: adjust background
⢠Pre-lunch/dinner: adjust previous mealtime insulin
⢠If more than 40 mg/dL (2.2 mmol/L) pre- to 2 hr.
postmeal rise, increase mealtime insulin by 1-3
units
â˘Adjust basal (background) insulin based on the pre-breakfast (AM) BG
â˘Adjust bolus (mealtime) insulin based on the pre-meal BG
Mazze R, et al. Staged Diabetes Management Adult Quick Guide, 5th
Edition Revised, 2010
International Diabetes Center
165. Pre prandial insulin dose
⢠INSULIN /CARBOHYDRATE ratio
⢠1-1.5 U/10 gm of carbohydrate
⢠Supplemental or correcting insulinâ1Uof
insulin for every 50mg/dl of glucose over
the preprandial glucose target.
⢠Ex
⢠A 60kg male has FBG 0f 250 mg/dl,desired
is 100mg/dl,the insulin dose is 60*(250-
100)/1500
166. Insulin dosage
⢠DKA
⢠Bolus doseâIV 0.1U/kg
⢠IM-0.3U/kg
⢠Then 0.1U/kg/hr
⢠Mild episodes of DKAâshort acting insulin analogues
⢠IV regular insulin to be used in infusion until acidosis
resolves
⢠0.05-0.1U/kg/hr.
168. 171
Classification
Blood
Glucose Level
(mg/dL)
Typical Signs and Symptoms
Mild hypoglycemia ~50-70
⢠Neurogenic: palpitations, tremor,
hunger, sweating, anxiety, paresthesia
Moderate
hypoglycemia
~50-70
⢠Neuroglycopenic: behavioral changes,
emotional lability, difficulty thinking,
confusion
Severe hypoglycemia <50*
⢠Severe confusion, unconsciousness,
seizure, coma, death
⢠Requires help from another individual
*Severe hypoglycemia symptoms should be treated regardless of blood glucose level.
Q6. How should hypoglycemia be managed?
169. Treatment of Hypoglycemia
172
Q6. How should hypoglycemia be managed?
Patient severely confused or
unconscious (requires help)
Patient severely confused or
unconscious (requires help)
o 15-30 gm of carbs ( 8 onz of juice,
2 crackers=10 carbs , glucose
tablets)
o RULE OF THUMB : 15 gm of
carbs will increased glucose levels
25-50 mg/dL
o Repeat glucose intake if SMBG
result remains low after 15 minutes
o Consume meal or snack after
SMBG has returned to normal to
avoid recurrence
o 15-30 gm of carbs ( 8 onz of juice,
2 crackers=10 carbs , glucose
tablets)
o RULE OF THUMB : 15 gm of
carbs will increased glucose levels
25-50 mg/dL
o Repeat glucose intake if SMBG
result remains low after 15 minutes
o Consume meal or snack after
SMBG has returned to normal to
avoid recurrence
Patient conscious and alertPatient conscious and alert
Hypoglycemia symptoms
(BG <70 mg/dL)
Hypoglycemia symptoms
(BG <70 mg/dL)
o 1 amp D50 or 1 mg
glucagon IM (repeat q
15 min )
o Patient should be taken
to hospital for
evaluation and
treatment after any
severe episode
o 1 amp D50 or 1 mg
glucagon IM (repeat q
15 min )
o Patient should be taken
to hospital for
evaluation and
treatment after any
severe episode
BG = blood glucose; SMBG = self-monitoring of blood glucose.
170. Insulin is released in response to varying blood glucose levels
and hypoglycemia does not occur
InsulinEffect
Basal Insulin
(~0.5-1.0 U/hr.)
âBolusâ Insulin
(Meal Associated)
Wednesday, January 20, 2016 173
171. BASAL INSULIN
⢠Suppress hepatic glucose
production (overnight and
intermeal)
⢠Prevent catabolism (lipid
and protein)
â Ketosis
â Unregulated amino
acid release
⢠Reduce glucolipotoxicity
BOLUS INSULIN
⢠Meal-associated CHO
disposal
⢠Storage of nutrients
⢠Help suppress inter-meal
hepatic glucose
production
Wednesday, January 20, 2016 174
174. Basic Insulin Regimen: Split-
Mixed Regimen or Premix
⢠Does not
mimic normal
physiology
⢠Requires meal
consistency
⢠Snacking may
result in weight
gain
⢠Hypo- and
hyperglycemia
Regular
NPH
B DL HS B
Endogenous insulin
Hyperglycemia
Wednesday, January 20, 2016 177
175. Split Mixed Insulin (R/N)
R/NR/NR/NR/N
RegReg
NPHNPH
RegReg
NPHNPH
0
10
20
30
40
50
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20 22 24
Time of DayTime of Day
SeruminsulinSeruminsulin(ÂľU/mL)
International Diabetes Center
Park Nicollet
176. InsulinEffect
B DL HS
Bolus insulin
Basal insulin
Basal-Bolus or Physiologic
Insulin Therapy
Endogenous insulin
Adapted with permission from McCall A. In: Insulin Therapy. Leahy J, Cefalu W, eds. New York, NY:
Marcel Dekker, Inc; 2002:193
Wednesday, January 20, 2016 179
180. Basic Insulin Regimen: Split-
Mixed Regimen or Premix
Regular
NPH
B DL HS B
Endogenous insulin
Wednesday, January 20, 2016 183
181. For pre mixed insulins(70/30 preparations)
Step1:First calculate the total daily starting requirement of
insulin;
body weight(kg)/2
eg, For a 60kg patient,total daily dose =30 units
Step 2:Then devide this dose into 3 equal parts;
10+10+10
Step 3:Give 2 parts in the morning and 1 part in the evening;
Morning=20U Evening=10 U
182. InsulinEffect
B DL HS
Bolus insulin
Basal insulin
Basal-Plus Insulin Therapy
Endogenous insulin
Adapted with permission from McCall A. In: Insulin Therapy. Leahy J, Cefalu W, eds. New York, NY:
Marcel Dekker, Inc; 2002:193
Wednesday, January 20, 2016 185
183. InsulinEffect
B DL HS
Bolus insulin
Inhaled Bolus Insulin
Therapy
Endogenous insulin
Adapted with permission from McCall A. In: Insulin Therapy. Leahy J, Cefalu W, eds. New York, NY:
Marcel Dekker, Inc; 2002:193
Wednesday, January 20, 2016 186
184. InsulinEffect
B DL HS
Bolus insulin
Basal insulin
Basal-Bolus or Physiologic
Insulin Therapy
Endogenous insulin
Adapted with permission from McCall A. In: Insulin Therapy. Leahy J, Cefalu W, eds. New York, NY:
Marcel Dekker, Inc; 2002:193
Wednesday, January 20, 2016 187
186. 1. Hedman CA et al. Diabetes Care 2001;24:1120-
1121 2. Home PD et al. Eur J Clin Pharm 1999;55:199-
201 3. Novo Nordisk, data on file
Time (min)
-60 0 60 120 180 240 300 360 420 480 540
Aspart 1,2
PlasmaInsulinLevels
Effect of Premixing on Rapid-
Acting Analog Properties
Tmax 49-53 min
70/30 NovoLog Mix 3
Tmax 2.4 hours
189
187. Clinical Secrets
⢠Plan target glucose goals
⢠Think in terms of basal and bolus insulin
⢠Typical ratio of basal to bolus is 50:50 or 60:40
⢠Correction doses are generally given before meals
⢠1700 Rule: 1700/TDD = Glucose lowering/unit insulin
⢠Adjust basal insulin based upon FBS and bolus
insulin based upon preprandial values
Wednesday, January 20, 2016 190
188. Summary of Key Dose
Concepts for Type 1 Diabetes
Parameter Formula Usual Range
Basal insulin
requirements
None (weight
based 0.2-0.5
U/kg)
12-24 U/day
Bolus requirements
(empiric)
Basal dose á 3 or
number of meals/d
5-10 U/meal
Insulin:CHO ratio CF x 0.33 ~15
Correction factor 1700 á TDD 30-50
NOTE: These are approximations on starting a physiologic insulin regimen and
must be adjusted based upon SMBG valuesWednesday, January 20, 2016 191
189. Contributions of FBG and
PPG to Overall Glycemia
Adapted from Monnier, Lapinski, Colette: Diab Care Mar 2003, pg 881
PPG + FBG = HbA1c (%)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
1 2 3 4 5
A1c Quintiles
Contribution(%)
(<7.3) (7.3-8.4) (8.5-9.2) (9.3-10.2) (>10.2)
PPG
FPG
Wednesday, January 20, 2016 192
191. Inhaled Insulin (Exubera)
and OHA
*P < .001
Weiss, et al. Diabetes. 1999;48(suppl 1):A12.
10
9
8
7
5
Baseline
(0)
Follow-up
(12)
Oral Agents +
Inhaled Insulin
Oral Agents Alone
SU and/or Met
Baseline
(0)
Follow-up
(12)
â2.3%
*
Weeks
6
HbA1c(%)
Wednesday, January 20, 2016 194
192. FPG: Exubera vs SC
Insulin at End Point
Hollander PA, et al. Diabetes Care. 2004;27:2356-2362.
Data on file.
Exubera SC
MeanâFPG(mg/dL)
-40
-35
-30
-25
-20
-15
-10
-5
0
Standard Intensive
Type 2 DM
194
163
203
190
201
167
209
207
152
132
158
149
Type 1 DM
On insulin
Wednesday, January 20, 2016 195
193. Inpatient Glucose Targets for
Nonpregnant Adults
Hospital Unit Treatment Goal
Intensive/critical care
Glucose range, mg/dL 140-180*
General medicine and surgery, non-ICU
Premeal glucose, mg/dL <140*
Random glucose, mg/dL <180*
196
Q3. What are glycemic treatment goals of DM?
ICU = intensive care unit.
*Provided target can be safely achieved.
194. Therapeutic Lifestyle
Changes
Parameter Treatment Goal
Weight loss
(for overweight and
obese patients)
Reduce by 5% to 10%
Physical activity
150 min/week of moderate-intensity exercise (eg, brisk walking) plus
flexibility and strength training
Diet
⢠Eat regular meals and snacks; avoid fasting to lose weight
⢠Consume plant-based diet (high in fiber, low calories/glycemic
index, and high in phytochemicals/antioxidants)
⢠Understand Nutrition Facts Label information
⢠Incorporate beliefs and culture into discussions
⢠Use mild cooking techniques instead of high-heat cooking
⢠Keep physician-patient discussions informal
197
Q4. How are glycemic targets achieved for T2D?
195. Diet
Multiple Insulin Injection Therapy
I
N
S
U
L
I
N
I
N
J
E
C
T
I
O
N
25 years male IBW 60 kgm
Carbohydrate (65%) 390
Protein (10%) 60
Fat (25%) 150
Carbohydrate 100 gm
Protein (10%) 15 gm
Fat (25%) 17 gm
Diet Carbohy. Protein Fat _
Arabian bread 30 gm --- ---
Cheese 5 gm 10 gm 10 gm
Honey 50 gm 2 gm 3 gm
Glass of milk 10 gm 5 gm 5 gm_
Total 95 gm 17 gm 18 gm
Carbohydrate (65%) 520
Protein (10%) 80
Fat (25%) 200
Carbohydrate 130 gm
Protein (10%) 20 gm
Fat (25%) 22 gm
Diet Carbohy. Protein Fat _
Rice 80 gm --- 6 gm
chicken 5 gm 15 gm 12 gm
Salad 30 gm 4 gm 4 gm
Orange 10 gm --- ---___
Total 125 gm 19 gm 22 gm
Carbohydrate (65%) 260
Protein (10%) 40
Fat (25%) 100
Carbohydrate 65 gm
Protein (10%) 10 gm
Fat (25%) 11 gm
Diet Carbohy. Protein Fat _
Tuna sandwich 45 gm 12 gm 10 gm
Apple 15 gm --- ---
Tea --- --- --- _
Total 95 gm 17 gm 18 gm
60 Kg X 30 kcal = 1800 kcal
Breakfast 600 kcal Lunch 800 kcal Dinner 400 kcal
The total calories intake depends on patients age and activity but have to
related to the desirable body weight.
Total daily calories = IBW X Estimated daily energyTotal daily calories = IBW X Estimated daily energy
Add 300 kcal/day during pregnancy.
Add 500 kcal/day during lactation.
Fibers, sweeteners, vitamins, and minerals.
196. Nutrition Guidelines for Patients
Taking Insulin
Guide to Starting and Adjusting Insulin for Type 2 Diabetes, Š International Diabetes Center, 2008
197. Healthful Eating
Recommendations
Carbohydrate
Specify healthful carbohydrates (fresh fruits and vegetables, legumes, whole grains); target
7-10 servings per day
Preferentially consume lower-glycemic index foods (glycemic index score <55 out of 100:
multigrain bread, pumpernickel bread, whole oats, legumes, apple, lentils, chickpeas,
mango, yams, brown rice)
Fat
Specify healthful fats (low mercury/contaminant-containing nuts, avocado, certain plant
oils, fish)
Limit saturated fats (butter, fatty red meats, tropical plant oils, fast foods) and trans fat;
choose fat-free or low-fat dairy products
Protein
Consume protein in foods with low saturated fats (fish, egg whites, beans); there is no need
to avoid animal protein
Avoid or limit processed meats
Micronutrients
Routine supplementation is not necessary; a healthful eating meal plan can generally
provide sufficient micronutrients
Chromium; vanadium; magnesium; vitamins A, C, and E; and CoQ10 are not recommended
for glycemic control
Vitamin supplements should be recommended to patients at risk of insufficiency or
deficiency
200
Q4. How are glycemic targets achieved for T2D?
198. Healthful Eating
Recommendations
Carbohydrate
Specify healthful carbohydrates (fresh fruits and vegetables, legumes, whole grains); target
7-10 servings per day
Preferentially consume lower-glycemic index foods (glycemic index score <55 out of 100:
multigrain bread, pumpernickel bread, whole oats, legumes, apple, lentils, chickpeas,
mango, yams, brown rice)
Fat
Specify healthful fats (low mercury/contaminant-containing nuts, avocado, certain plant
oils, fish)
Limit saturated fats (butter, fatty red meats, tropical plant oils, fast foods) and trans fat;
choose fat-free or low-fat dairy products
Protein
Consume protein in foods with low saturated fats (fish, egg whites, beans); there is no need
to avoid animal protein
Avoid or limit processed meats
Micronutrients
Routine supplementation is not necessary; a healthful eating meal plan can generally
provide sufficient micronutrients
Chromium; vanadium; magnesium; vitamins A, C, and E; and CoQ10 are not recommended
for glycemic control
Vitamin supplements should be recommended to patients at risk of insufficiency or
deficiency
201
Q4. How are glycemic targets achieved for T2D?
201. Blood Pressure Targets
204
Q7. How should hypertension be managed?
Parameter Treatment Goal
Blood pressure
Individualize on the basis of age, comorbidities, and
duration of disease, with general target of:
Systolic, mm Hg ~130
Diastolic, mm Hg ~80
ďA more intensive goal (such as <120/80 mm Hg) should be
considered for some patients, provided the target can be safely
reached without adverse effects from medication.
ďMore relaxed goals may be considered for patients with
complicated comorbidities or those experience adverse
medication effects.
204. Medical Complications of Obesity
207
NAFLD
Cardiovascular DiseaseCardiovascular Disease
Dismotility/disability
GERD
Lung function
defects
Osteoarthritis
Sleep apnea
Urinary incontinence
Prediabetic states
HypertensionDyslipidemia
PCOS
DiabetesDiabetes
CardiometabolicCardiometabolicBiomechanicalBiomechanical OtherOther
GERD, gastroesophageal reflux disease; NAFLD, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease; PCOS, polycystic ovary syndrome.
Pi-Sunyer X. Postgrad Med. 2009;121:21-33.
Androgen
deficiency
Cancer
Gallbladder
disease
Psychological
disorders
Q13. How is obesity managed in patients with diabetes?
205. Diagnosis of Obesity and Staging of for
Management
⢠Diagnose obesity according to body mass index (BMI)
â Overweight: BMI 25-29.9 kg/m2
â Obese*: BMI âĽ30 kg/m2
⢠Consider waist circumference measurement for patients
with BMI between 25 and 35 kg/m2
â Larger waist circumference = higher risk for metabolic
disease
⢠Men: >102 cm (40 in)
⢠Women: >88 cm (35 in)
⢠Evaluate patients for obesity-related complications to
determine disease severity and appropriate management
208
Q13. How is obesity managed in patients with diabetes?
208
*BMI 23-24.9 may be considered obese in certain ethnicities; perform waist circumference and use ethnicity-specific criteria in risk analysis.
206. Lipid Targets
209
Q8. How should dyslipidemia be managed?
Parameter
Treatment Goal
Moderate risk High risk
Primary Goals
LCL-C, mg/dL <100 <70
NonâHDL-C, mg/dL <130 <100
Triglycerides, mg/dL <150 <150
TC/HDL-C ratio <3.5 <3.0
Secondary Goals
ApoB, mg/dL <90 <80
LDL particles <1,200 <1,000
ď Moderate risk = diabetes or prediabetes with no ASCVD or major CV risk factors
ď High risk = established ASCVD or âĽ1 major CV risk factor
ď CV risk factors
ApoB = apolipoprotein B; ASCVD = atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease; CV = cardiovascular; HDL-C = high density lipoprotein
cholesterol; LDL = low-density lipoprotein; LDL-C = low-density lipoprotein cholesterol; TC = total cholesterol.
207. Lipid Management
210
Q8. How should dyslipidemia be managed?
ApoB = apolipoprotein B; HDL-C = high density lipoprotein cholesterol; LDL = low-density lipoprotein; LDL-C = low-density lipoprotein
cholesterol; TC = total cholesterol; TG = triglycerides.
208.
209. Assessment of Diabetic
Nephropathy
212
Q9. How is nephropathy managed in patients with diabetes?
AER = albumin excretion rate; eGFR = estimated glomerular filtration rate; T1D = type 1 diabetes; T2D = type 2 diabetes.
⢠Annual assessments
â Serum creatinine to determine eGFR
â Urine AER
⢠Begin annual screening
â 5 years after diagnosis of T1D if diagnosed
before age 30 years
â At diagnosis of T2D or T1D in patients
diagnosed after age 30 years
210. Staging of Chronic Kidney Disease
213
Q9. How is nephropathy managed in patients with diabetes?
CKD = chronic kidney disease; GFR = glomerular filtration rate; NKF = National Kidney Foundation.
Levey AS, et al. Kidney Int. 2011;80:17-28.
211.
212. Diabetic Neuropathy Evaluations and Tests
Foot inspection
Foot structure and deformities
Skin temperature and integrity
Ulcers
Vascular status
Pedal pulses
Amputations
Neurologic testing
Loss of sensation, using 1 and 10-g monofilament
Vibration perception using 128-Hz tuning fork
Ankle reflexes
Touch, pinprick, and warm and cold sensation
Painful neuropathy
May have no physical signs
Diagnosis may require skin biopsy or other surrogate measure
Cardiovascular
autonomic neuropathy
Heart rate variability with:
â˘Deep inspiration
â˘Valsalva maneuver
â˘Change in position from prone to standing
215
Q11. How is neuropathy diagnosed and managed in patients with diabetes?
DM = diabetes mellitus; T1D = type 1 diabetes; T2D = type 2 diabetes.
213. Diabetic Neuropathy Management
All neuropathies
⢠Prevent by controlling blood glucose to individual targets
⢠No therapies proven to reverse neuropathy once it is established
⢠May slow progression by maintaining optimal glucose, blood
pressure, and lipid control and using other interventions that reduce
oxidative stress
Painful neuropathy
⢠Tricyclic antidepressants, anticonvulsants, serotonin reuptake
inhibitors, or norepinephrine reuptake inhibitors
Large-fiber
neuropathies
⢠Strength, gait, and balance training
⢠Orthotics to prevent/treat foot deformities
⢠Tendon lengthening for pes equinus
⢠Surgical reconstruction
⢠Casting
Small-fiber
neuropathies
⢠Foot protection (eg, padded socks)
⢠Supportive shoes with orthotics if needed
⢠Regular foot inspection
⢠Prevention of heat injury
⢠Emollient creams
216
Q11. How is neuropathy diagnosed and managed in patients with diabetes?
214. Comprehensive Management of CV Risk
⢠Manage CV risk factors
â Weight loss
â Smoking cessation
â Optimal glucose, blood pressure, and lipid control
⢠Use low-dose aspirin for secondary prevention of CV
events in patients with existing CVD
â May consider low-dose aspirin for primary prevention of CV
events in patients with 10-year CV risk >10%
⢠Measure coronary artery calcification or use coronary
imaging to determine whether glucose, lipid, or blood
pressure control efforts should be intensified
217
Q12. How is CVD managed in patients with diabetes?
CV = cardiovascular; CVD = cardiovascular disease.
215. Statin Use
⢠Majority of patients with
T2D have a high
cardiovascular risk
⢠People with T1D are at
elevated cardiovascular
risk
⢠LDL-C target: <70 mg/dL
âfor the majority of
patients with diabetes who
are determined to have a
high risk
⢠Use a statin regardless of
LDL-C level in patients
with diabetes who meet
the following criteria:
â >40 years of age
â âĽ1 major ASCVD risk
factor
⢠Hypertension
⢠Family history of CVD
⢠Low HDL-C
⢠Smoking
218
Q12. How is CVD managed in patients with diabetes?
ASCVD = atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease; CVD = cardiovascular disease; HDL-C = high density lipoprotein cholesterol;
LDL-C = low-density lipoprotein cholesterol.
216. Obstructive Sleep Apnea
Risk Factors Treatment Options
⢠Obesity
⢠Male sex
⢠Neck circumference >44 cm
⢠Age
⢠Narrowed airway
⢠Family history
⢠Hypertension
⢠Alcohol or sedatives
⢠Smoking
⢠Weight loss
⢠Continuous positive airway
pressure (CPAP)
⢠Additional options
â Adjustable airway pressure
devices
â Oral appliances
â Surgery
⢠Uvulopalatopharyngoplasty
(UPPP)
⢠Maxillomandibular
advancement
⢠Tracheostomy
219
Q14. What is the role of sleep medicine in the care of the patient with
diabetes?
217.
218.
219.
220.
221.
222.
223.
224.
225.
226.
227.
228.
229.
230.
231.
232.
233.
234.
235.
236.
237.
238.
239.
240.
241.
242.
243.
244.
245. DM and Depression
248
Q22. How should depression be managed in the context of
diabetes?
⢠Screen all adults with DM for depression
â Untreated comorbid depression can have
serious clinical implications for patients with
DM
⢠Consider referring patients with depression
to mental health professionals who are
knowledgeable about DM
246. DM and Cancer
⢠Screen obese individuals with DM more frequently and rigorously for
certain cancers
â Endometrial, breast, hepatic, bladder, pancreatic, colorectal cancers
⢠Increased BMI (âĽ25 kg/m2) also increases risk of some cancers
â Strong associations: endometrial, gall bladder, esophageal , renal, thyroid,
ovarian, breast, and colorectal cancer
â Weaker associations: leukemia, malignant and multiple melanoma,
pancreatic cancer, non-Hodgkin lymphoma
⢠To date, no definitive relationship has been established between
specific hyperglycemic agents and increased risk of cancer or cancer-
related mortality
â Consider avoiding medications considered disadvantageous to specific
cancers in individuals at risk for or with a history of that cancer
249
Q23. What is the association between diabetes and cancer?
247. DM and Occupational Hazards
250
Q24. Which occupations have specific diabetes management
requirements?
⢠Commercial drivers at high risk for developing T2D
â Screen as appropriate
â Encourage healthy lifestyle change
⢠Be aware of management requirements and use
agents with reduced risk of hypoglycemia in
patients with occupations that could put others at
risk, such as (not inclusive):
â Commercial drivers
â Pilots
â Anesthesiologists
â Commercial or recreational divers
251. Somogyi Phenomenon
Multiple Insulin Injection Therapy
I
N
S
U
L
I
N
I
N
J
E
C
T
I
O
N
0
10
20
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
Cause:
Counter regulatory hormones response
to hypoglycemia at med-night.
Increase in hepatic glucose production.
Insulin resistance because of the
Counter regulatory hormones.
Treatment:
Decrease pre-supper intermediate insulin.
Defer the dose to 9 PM.
Change or start pre-bed snack.
â Check BSL AT 3 :00 a.m
â Give long acting at 11:00 p.m so peak
comes later
â Reduce dose of night time insulin
252. Dawn Phenomenon
Multiple Insulin Injection Therapy
I
N
S
U
L
I
N
I
N
J
E
C
T
I
O
N
0
10
20
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24
Cause:
Less insulin at bed time.
More food at bed time.
Not using NPH at night.
Growth hormone surge at dawn
raises insulin requirement.
Treatment:
Use enough dose.
Reduce bed time snack.
⢠Add NPH pre-supper. Give long
acting insulin not before 11 :00 p.m
â˘May need to increase dose of
night time insulin
254. Pearls for practice
ď§ Never try to control diabetes with oral hypoglycemic drugs /
insulin without first ensuring strict diet control.
ď§ Always bring fasting sugar to normal before trying to control
post prandial / random blood sugar.
ď§ Control any underlying infection/stressful condition vigorously.
ď§ Keep meal timings regular with 6 hrs between the three meals.
ď§ Do not inject NPH before 11 p.m.
ď§ Keep number of calories during the meals same from day to day.
The quantity and quality of diet should be same at same timings.
ď§ Do not use sliding scale to calculate the dose of insulin.
ď§ Use proper technique to inject s/c insulin.
ď§ Ensure proper storage of insulin.
255. Case---History
25 year old student comes to clinic for management
of type 1 diabetes. He was diagnosed
approximately 3 years ago and has been managed
with twice daily NPH insulin and lispro. He is
frustrated because his glucose values fluctuate
considerably, and he is having multiple episodes
of hypoglycemia.
His most recent A1C returned 7.8%.
Wednesday, January 20, 2016 258
257. Case Study--History
His current insulin regimen consists of 16 U of NPH plus 5 to
15 U of lispro prior to breakfast and 12 U of NPH with a
similar amount of lispro prior to supper. He would give
correction doses of lispro prior to lunch, bedtime and
occasionally at 2-4 AM. If he was âlowâ, he would eat
carbohydrate and not take lispro.
His home glucose log documented testing 4 to 5 times a day
with values ranging from 40 to 500 mg/dl.
How should his management be approached?
Wednesday, January 20, 2016 260
258. Case Study--Approach
⢠Set a reasonable goal for glycemic control
â Initial goal was to avoid hypoglycemia (glucose
targets 120-150 mg/dL)
⢠Trouble-shoot the insulin regimen
â Which type of insulin and which injection is
doing what?
â Good luck doing it with this patient!
Wednesday, January 20, 2016 261
259. Case Study--Approach
⢠Variables with injected insulin:
â Type of insulin and site of injection
â Type of food and gastric emptying
â Remembering to take injections
â Accuracy of HGM
⢠Designing an insulin regimen
â Think in terms of basal and bolus
Wednesday, January 20, 2016 262
260. Case Study--Approach
⢠We opted to use glargine as the basal
insulin and lispro as the bolus insulin
⢠Dose calculations:
â TDD: 48 to 73 U
â Basal (as NPH): 16+12=28 U
â Glargine: 28 x 0.8=22.4 U
CURRENT REGIMEN
16/10 and 12/10 (N/H)
TDDâ48 U/day
PLUS up to 25 U H/D
Wednesday, January 20, 2016 263
261. Case Study--Approach
⢠Usual insulin regimens are 50:50 or 60:40
basal:bolus
â TDD: 48 to 73 U
â Glargine: 22 U
â Bolus: ~ 22 U (50:50 Rule)
⢠Per meal 22/3= 7.3 U/meal
⢠Designed regimen: Glargine 22 U/HS; lispro 7 U
BEFORE EACH MAJOR MEAL
Wednesday, January 20, 2016 264
262. Case Study--Approach
⢠Correction doses (âsliding scaleâ)
â 1700 Rule (some modify this as the 1500 Rule
or the 1800 Rule)
â 1700/TDD = Expected amount of glucose
lowering per unit of insulin
⢠Our patient
â 1700/44 = 38 â´ 1 U insulin would lower his
glucose 38 mg/dl
Wednesday, January 20, 2016 265
263. Case Study--Approach
⢠Our goal glucose is ~ 150 mg/dL
⢠Our patient is instructed to:
â Take 22 U glargine at bed time (or ~ 10:00 PM)
â Start with 7 U of lispro before meals
⢠For every 50 mg/dL glucose is above 150, add 1 U lispro or
for every 50 below 150, subtract 1 U lispro
â Have the patient monitor and adjust the regimen based
upon results of HGM
Wednesday, January 20, 2016 266
Editor's Notes
Image: scienceblogs.com
How about drawing an arrow (yellow?) to show the islets?
Individuals with a genetic predisposition are exposed to an immunologic trigger that initiates an autoimmune process, resulting in a gradual decline in beta cell mass. The downward slope of the beta cell mass varies among individuals and may not be continuous. This progressive impairment in insulin release results in diabetes when 80% of the beta cell mass is destroyed. A &quot;honeymoon&quot; phase may be seen in the first 1 or 2 years after the onset of diabetes and is associated with reduced insulin requirements. [Adapted from Medical Management of Type 1 Diabetes, 3rd ed, JS Skyler (ed). American Diabetes Association, Alexandria, VA, 1998.]
Insulin and appetite interact in the brain when neurotransmitters in the hypothalamus signal satiety in response to increased insulin.
Adding brain and neurotransmitter dysfunction to the pathogenic picture of type 2 diabetes gives us the ominous octet.
DO NOT INCLUDE
Hormone levels were tracked in persons with normal glucose tolerance (green curves) and in T2DM patients (orange curves) before and after a carbohydrate challenge.1
For insulin (left graph), the normal response was a steep rise. Diabetic patients showed only a blunted response.
For glucagon (right graph), the normal response was an acute fall. Among patients with diabetes, findings reveal that glucagon is not suppressed and may experience an inappropriate increase, revealing inherent dysfunction of the pancreatic Îą-cell.
1. Muller WA, Faloona GR, Aguilar-Parada E, Unger RH. Abnormal alpha-cell function in diabetes: response to carbohydrate and protein ingestion. N Engl J Med. 1970;283:109-115.
Hormone levels were tracked in persons with normal glucose tolerance (green curves) and in T2DM patients (orange curves) before and after a carbohydrate challenge.1
For insulin (left graph), the normal response was a steep rise. Diabetic patients showed only a blunted response.
For glucagon (right graph), the normal response was an acute fall. Among patients with diabetes, findings reveal that glucagon is not suppressed and may experience an inappropriate increase, revealing inherent dysfunction of the pancreatic Îą-cell.
1. Muller WA, Faloona GR, Aguilar-Parada E, Unger RH. Abnormal alpha-cell function in diabetes: response to carbohydrate and protein ingestion. N Engl J Med. 1970;283:109-115.
Slide 6-4
TYPE 2 DIABETESâŚA PROGRESSIVE DISEASE
Progressive Decline of ď˘-Cell Function in the UKPDS
In 1996, results of 6 years of follow-up of the patients in the UK Prospective Diabetes Study were reported. Although the patients who received intensive treatment maintained significantly better glycemic control, all groups showed progressive hyperglycemia over the 6 years, with associated decrease in ď˘-cell function. ď˘-Cell function deteriorated in the patients who were allocated to and remained on diet therapy, with a significant decrease from 1 to 6 years (53% to 26%; P &lt; .0001). Those on sulfonylurea therapy displayed an increase in ď˘-cell function during the first year of therapy (46% to 78%) that subsequently decreased significantly to 52% (P &lt; .0001) by year 6. Patients who were allocated to metformin therapy also had an increase in ď˘-cell function in the first year that deteriorated at 6 years (66% to 38%), which was similar to that seen in the patients treated with diet alone.
UK Prospective Diabetes Study Group. UK Prospective Diabetes Study 16: Overview of 6 yearsâ therapy of type II diabetes: A progressive disease. Diabetes. 1995;44:1249-1258.
The classification of diabetes includes four clinical categories
Type 1 diabetes (due to β-cell destruction, usually leading to absolute insulin deficiency)
Type 2 diabetes (due to a progressive insulin secretory defect on the background of insulin resistance)
Other specific types of diabetes due to other causes; e.g., genetic defects in β-cell function, genetic defects in insulin action, diseases of the exocrine pancreas (such as cystic fibrosis), and drug- or chemical-induced diabetes (such as in the treatment of HIV/AIDS or after organ transplantation)
Gestational diabetes mellitus (GDM)(diabetes diagnosed during pregnancy that is not clearly overt diabetes)
Some patients cannot be clearly classified as having type 1 or type 2 diabetes
Clinical presentation and disease progression vary considerably in both types of diabetes
Occasionally, patients who otherwise have type 2 diabetes may present with ketoacidosis
Children with type 1 diabetes typically present with the hallmark symptoms of polyuria/polydipsia and occasionally with diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA)
However, difficulties in diagnosis may occur in children, adolescents, and adults, with the true diagnosis becoming more obvious over time
A complete medical evaluation should be performed to classify the diabetes, detect the presence of diabetes complications, review previous treatment and risk factor control in patients with established diabetes, assist in formulating a management plan, and provide a basis for continuing care
Laboratory tests appropriate to the evaluation of each patientâs medical condition should be performed
A focus on the components of comprehensive care (Table 3.1), will enable the health care team to optimally manage the patient with diabetes
A focus on the components of comprehensive diabetes evaluation (as outlined on this and the next 6 slides) will help ensure optimal management of the patient with diabetes
Slide 1 of 7 (Part 1 of 3)
The first component of the comprehensive diabetes evaluation is medical history
Age, characteristics of diabetes onset, such as diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) or an asymptomatic laboratory finding
Eating patterns, physical activity habits, nutritional status, and weight history as well as growth and development in children and adolescents
History of diabetes education
Review of previous treatment regimens and response to therapy (i.e., A1C records)
Slide 4 of 7 (Part 1 of 2)
A physical examination of the patient with diabetes includes
Height, weight, and body mass index (BMI)
Determination of blood pressure that includes orthostatic measurements when indicated
A fundoscopic examination (patients should be appropriately referred when necessary)
Palpation of the thyroid
An examination of the skin for acanthosis nigricans and sites of insulin injection
Slide 6 of 7
This slide details the components of a laboratory evaluation
If not available within the past 2-3 months, an A1C test is required
If the following test results are not available or these tests were not performed during the previous year, the clinician should perform
A fasting lipid profile, including total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, and HDL-cholesterol levels as well as triglyceride level
Liver function tests
Urine albumin excretion test that includes a spot urine albumin/creatinine ratio
A serum creatinine test that includes a calculated glomerular filtration rate (GFR)
A thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH) test in patients with type 1 diabetes, dyslipidemia, or in women older than 50 years of age
This slide reviews criteria for diabetes diagnosis from the 2015 ADA guidelines.
Refer to source document for full recommendations, including level of evidence rating.
American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetesâ2015. Diabetes Care. 2015;38(suppl 1):S1-S93.
January 2014
This slide was created by Ashfield Healthcare Communications and was not associated with funding via an educational grant or a promotional/commercial interest.
This slide reviews criteria for screening and diagnosing gestational diabetes from the 2015 ADA guidelines.
Refer to source document for full recommendations, including level of evidence rating.
American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetesâ2015. Diabetes Care. 2015;38(suppl 1):S1-S93.
January 2014
This slide was created by Ashfield Healthcare Communications and was not associated with funding via an educational grant or a promotional/commercial interest.
This slide reviews two strategies for diagnosing gestational diabetes from the 2015 ADA guidelines.
Refer to source document for full recommendations, including level of evidence rating.
American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetesâ2015. Diabetes Care. 2015;38(suppl 1):S1-S93.
January 2014
This slide was created by Ashfield Healthcare Communications and was not associated with funding via an educational grant or a promotional/commercial interest.
This slide reviews categories of increased risk for diabetes from the 2015 ADA guidelines.
Refer to source document for full recommendations, including level of evidence rating.
American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetesâ2015. Diabetes Care. 2015;38(suppl 1):S1-S93.
January 2014
This slide was created by Ashfield Healthcare Communications and was not associated with funding via an educational grant or a promotional/commercial interest.
This slide reviews criteria for type 2 diabetes and prediabetes screening in children from the 2015 ADA guidelines.
Refer to source document for full recommendations, including level of evidence rating.
American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetesâ2015. Diabetes Care. 2015;38(suppl 1):S1-S93.
January 2014
This slide was created by Ashfield Healthcare Communications and was not associated with funding via an educational grant or a promotional/commercial interest.
Both the ADA and the AACE recommend tight glucose control for persons with diabetes, although their definitions vary.
Despite the findings of two large-scale trials, the DCCT and UKPDS, a universally agreed-upon set of glucose management goals has yet to be defined. While almost every diabetes management guideline includes the hallmark variables of A1c and fasting plasma glucose, there are slight variations in specific target values. The American Diabetes Association (ADA) currently recommends a target A1c of &lt;7%, while the American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists (AACE) suggests aiming for a value of 6.5% or lower. The ADA proposes a target range for fasting plasma glucose levels between 90 and 130 mg/dL, while the AACE recommends levels below 110 mg/dL. Postprandial plasma glucose recommendations put forth by the two organizations are &lt;180 and &lt;140 mg/dL, respectively.
In addition to these standard variables, there are other important aspects of diabetes management that deserve consideration. Other important issues identified in the two landmark trials, both medically and from a quality of life perspective, include reducing the frequency of hyperglycemic excursions, minimizing the risk of hypoglycemia, especially nocturnal, and minimizing weight gain. Addressing these issues could have an impact on patient motivation and/or treatment compliance, increasing the chance of attaining A1c and plasma glucose goals.
References:
American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetes â 2006. Diabetes Care. 2006;29(suppl 1):S4-S42. Implementation Conference for ACE Outpatient Diabetes Mellitus Consensus Conference Recommendations: Position Statement at http://www.aace.com/pub/pdf/guidelines/Outpatient ImplementationPositionStatement.pdf. Accessed January 6, 2006.
This slide reviews the elements of a collaborative, integrated diabetes management team from the 2015 ADA guidelines.
Refer to source document for full recommendations, including level of evidence rating.
American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetesâ2015. Diabetes Care. 2015;38(suppl 1):S1-S93.
January 2014
This slide was created by Ashfield Healthcare Communications and was not associated with funding via an educational grant or a promotional/commercial interest.
This slide reviews recommendations for preventing or delaying type 2 diabetes from the 2015 ADA guidelines.
Refer to source document for full recommendations, including level of evidence rating.
American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetesâ2015. Diabetes Care. 2015;38(suppl 1):S1-S93.
January 2014
This slide was created by Ashfield Healthcare Communications and was not associated with funding via an educational grant or a promotional/commercial interest.
This slide, âApproach to Management of Hyperglycemia,â depicts the elements of decision making used to determine appropriate efforts to achieve glycemic targets1 (Adapted with permission from Inzucchi et al.)
Characteristics/predicaments toward the left justify more stringent efforts to lower A1C, whereas those toward the right are compatible with less stringent efforts
Where possible, such decisions should be made in conjunction with the patient, reflecting his or her preferences, needs, and values
This âscaleâ is not designed to be applied rigidly but to be used as a broad construct to help guide clinical decisions
Those with long duration of diabetes, known history of severe hypoglycemia, advanced atherosclerosis, and advanced age/frailty may benefit from less aggressive targets
Providers should be vigilant in preventing severe hypoglycemia in patients with advanced disease and should not aggressively attempt to achieve near-normal A1C levels in patients in whom such targets cannot be safely and reasonably achieved
Severe or frequent hypoglycemia is an absolute indication for the modification of treatment regimens, including setting higher glycemic goals
This slide reviews recommended pharmacologic therapy for treating and managing type 1 diabetes from the 2015 ADA guidelines.
Refer to source document for full recommendations, including level of evidence rating.
American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetesâ2015. Diabetes Care. 2015;38(suppl 1):S1-S93.
January 2014Any pharmacologic agents discussed are approved for use in the United States by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) unless otherwise noted. Consult individual prescribing information for approved uses outside of the United States.
This slide was created by Ashfield Healthcare Communications and was not associated with funding via an educational grant or a promotional/commercial interest.
This slide reviews the key principles for managing hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes from the updated position statement of the American Diabetes Association and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (ADA/EASD).
Refer to source document for full recommendations.
Inzucchi SI, Bergenstal RM, Buse JB, et al. Management of hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes: 2015: A patient-centered approach. Update to a position statement of the American Diabetes Association and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2015;38(1):140-149.
January 2015
This slide was created by Ashfield Healthcare Communications and was not associated with funding via an educational grant or a promotional/commercial interest.
This slide reviews recommendations for antihyperglycemic therapy for type 2 diabetes from the updated position statement of the American Diabetes Association and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (ADA/EASD).
Abbreviations:DPP-4 inhibitor=dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor; GLP-1 RA=glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist; MET=metformin; SGLT2 inhibitor=sodium glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitor; SU=sulfonylurea; TZD=thiazolidinedione
Refer to source document for full recommendations.
Inzucchi SI, Bergenstal RM, Buse JB, et al. Management of hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes: 2015: A patient-centered approach. Update to a position statement of the American Diabetes Association and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2015;38(1):140-149.
January 2015
This slide was created by Ashfield Healthcare Communications and was not associated with funding via an educational grant or a promotional/commercial interest.
This slide summarizes the general recommendations for antihyperglycemic therapy in type 2 diabetes, as outlined in the ADA-European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD) position statement
Definitions: DPP-4-i,DPP-4 inhibitor; Fxâs, bone fractures; GI, gastrointestinal; GLP-1-RA, GLP-1 receptor agonist; HF, heart failure; SU, sulfonylurea; TZD, thiazolidinedione
This 2015 position statement is less prescriptive than prior algorithms and discusses advantages/disadvantages of the available medication classes and considerations for use
A patient-centered approach is stressed, including patient preferences, cost and potential side effects of each class, effects on body weight, and hypoglycemia risk
Metformin is reaffirmed as the preferred initial agent, barring contraindication or intolerance, either in addition to lifestyle counseling and support for weight loss and exercise, or when lifestyle efforts alone have not achieved or maintained glycemic goals
The progressive nature of type 2 diabetes and its therapies should be regularly and objectively explained to patients
Equipping patients with an algorithm for self-titration of insulin doses based on SMBG results improves glycemic control in type 2 diabetic patients initiating insulin3
Approach to starting and adjusting insulin in type 2 diabetes. FBG, fasting blood glucose; GLP-1-RA, GLP-1 receptor agonist; hypo, hypoglycemia; mod., moderate; PPG, postprandial glucose; #, number. Adapted with permission from Inzucchi et al. Diabetes Care, 2015;38:140-149
This slide reviews strategies for insulin use in type 2 diabetes from the updated position statement of the American Diabetes Association and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (ADA/EASD).
Refer to source document for full recommendations.
Inzucchi SI, Bergenstal RM, Buse JB, et al. Management of hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes: 2015: A patient-centered approach. Update to a position statement of the American Diabetes Association and the European Association for the Study of Diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2015;38(1):140-149.
January 2015
This slide was created by Ashfield Healthcare Communications and was not associated with funding via an educational grant or a promotional/commercial interest.
Beta-cell function is tied to glycemic control
Type 2 diabetes is characterized by insulin resistance and the progressive loss of islet beta-cell function. Although the former is already established at diagnosis and changes little thereafter, beta-cell function continues to decline, leading to secondary failure of anti-hyperglycemic therapies.
In the UKPDS, glycemic deterioration was associated with progressive loss of beta-cell function.
Reference
Lebovitz H. Insulin secretagogues: old and new. Diabetes Rev 1999;7:139-153.
Here are some of the older oral drug classes used in T2DM. The table describes the mechanism of action of each class, its advantages, disadvantages and cost. Less commonly used classes are denoted in grey font.
Additional oral agent classes used in T2DM are included on this slide. The table describes the mechanism of action of each class, its advantages, disadvantages and cost. Less commonly used classes are denoted in grey font.
Here now are the injectable drugs used in T2DM. The table describes the mechanism of action of each class, its advantages, disadvantages and cost. Less commonly used classes are denoted in grey font.
This slide reviews recommendations for the frequency of A1C testing from the 2015 ADA guidelines.
Refer to source document for full recommendations, including level of evidence rating.
American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetesâ2015. Diabetes Care. 2015;38(suppl 1):S1-S93.
January 2014
This slide was created by Ashfield Healthcare Communications and was not associated with funding via an educational grant or a promotional/commercial interest.
This slide shows the correlation of A1C with average glucose from the 2015 ADA guidelines.
Refer to source document for full recommendations, including level of evidence rating.
American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetesâ2015. Diabetes Care. 2015;38(suppl 1):S1-S93.
January 2014
This slide was created by Ashfield Healthcare Communications and was not associated with funding via an educational grant or a promotional/commercial interest.
Key Points
Insulin is the oldest of the currently available medications for the management of hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes and has the most clinical experience.
It is the most effective of diabetes medications in lowering glycemia: when used in adequate doses it can decrease any level of elevated HbA1c to, or close to, the therapeutic goal, and there appears to be no maximum dose beyond which a therapeutic effect will not occur.
Insulin has also been shown to beneficially affect triglyceride and HDL cholesterol levels.
Reference:
Nathan DM et al. Management of hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes: a consensus
algorithm for the initiation and adjustment of therapy. Diabetes Care 2006;29(8):1963-72.
Key Point
This slide illustrates the effect of insulin on triglycerides and HDL cholesterol levels in a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, 9-month study in 31 patients with type 2 diabetes treated with NPH insulin (n=15) or glyburide (n=16).
Reference:
Nathan DM et al. Glyburide or insulin for metabolic control in non-insulin-dependent
diabetes mellitus. A randomized, double-blind study. Ann Int Med 1988;108:334-40.
Key Points
The disadvantages of insulin therapy include weight gain of roughly 2 to 4 kilograms, which is probably proportional to the correction of glycemia and owing predominantly to the reduction of glycosuria. This weight gain could adversely affect cardiovascular health.
Insulin therapy is also associated with hypoglycemia; however, rates are much lower than in type 1 diabetes. In clinical trials aimed at normoglycemia and achieving a mean HbA1c of approximately 7%, severe hypoglycemic episodes (defined as requiring help from another person to treat) occurred at a rate of 61 per 100 patient-years in a type 1 diabetes trial (i.e., the DCCT intensive-therapy group), but occurred at a rate of just 1 to 3 per 100 patient-years in trials with type 2 diabetics.
Reference:
Nathan DM et al. Management of hyperglycemia in type 2 diabetes: a consensus
algorithm for the initiation and adjustment of therapy. Diabetes Care 2006;29(8):1963-72.
Key Point
Essentially, the key to good insulin therapy is to balance good glycemic control with a low risk of hypoglycemia.
Key Points
Long-acting insulin has demonstrated lower rates of hypoglycemia than premixed insulin.
Shown here are the results of a randomized, 28-week study in 233 insulin-naĂŻve patients with type 2 diabetes treated with BIAsp 70/30 bid or 10-12 units glargine at bedtime titrated to target blood glucose by algorithm-directed titration.
Rates of minor hypoglycemia, both in terms of the number of episodes per patient-year and the percentage of patients experiencing minor hypoglycemia, were significantly lower with insulin glargine.
Reference:
Raskin P et al. Initiating insulin therapy in type 2 diabetes: a comparison of biphasic
and basal insulin analogs. Diabetes Care 2005;28(2):260-5.
Key Points
Compared with NPH insulin, long-acting insulin analogues have demonstrated higher rates of patients achieving HbA1c targets without hypoglycemia.
More patients receiving once-daily insulin glargine or twice-daily insulin detemir achieved their glycemic targets without hypoglycemia versus patients receiving NPH in two randomized, open-label, parallel-group, 24-week multicenter trials of patients with inadequate glycemic control (HbA1c &gt;7.5%) (n=756 and n=475, respectively).
References:
Riddle M et al. The treat-to-target trial: randomized addition of glargine or human NPH insulin to oral therapy of type 2 diabetic patients. Diabetes Care 2003;26:3080-6.
Hermansen K et al. A 26-week, randomized, parallel, treat-to-target trial comparing insulin detemir with NPH insulin as add-on therapy to oral glucose-lowering drugs in insulin-naĂŻve people with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 2006;29:1269-74.
Key Points
The combination of a long-acting insulin and oral antidiabetic (OAD) therapy has been shown to have a significantly lower risk of hypoglycemia than premixed insulin.
Rates of symptomatic (p=0.0009), nocturnal (p=0.0449) and severe hypoglycemia (p=0.0702) were all lower in an open-label, 24-week, multicenter, parallel group clinical trial of 371 insulin-naĂŻve patients with poor glycemic control (FBG 120 mg/dl, HbA1c 7.5-10.5%) on sulfonylurea plus metformin.
Hypoglycemia was defined as blood glucose &lt;60mg/dl (&lt;3.3 mmol/l) and severe hypoglycemia as blood glucose &lt;36mg/dl (&lt;2.0 mmol/l).
Reference:
Janka HU et al. Comparison of basal insulin added to oral agents versus twice-daily
premixed insulin as initial insulin therapy for type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care
2005;28:254-9.
DES THreo Miristic acid
DES THreo Miristic acid
Titrating background insulin focus on am fasting BG.
Once you reach 0.5 units/kg body weight, explain to the patient that a RA insulin will need to be added
If fasting BG is in target and A1C &gt; 7%, it means that there are other timepoints throughout the day where the patient is having higher blood sugar. Ask them to do some post meal testing. This also helps them see that they&apos;re a partner with you in taking care of their diabetes. They provide you with importnat information which in turn helps you to make the best decision for them.
For premixed insulin if BG over 200 increase total dose by 0.2 units
Distribute evening between the two doses
For background mealtime regimen increased total insulin dose by 0.1 units and add half to the background and distribute other half between mealtime doses
If more than 40 mg/dl add 1-3 units
Slide 6-23
INSULIN TACTICS
Twice-daily Split-mixed Regimens
Twice-daily mixtures of NPH and regular insulins have been widely used for type 2 diabetes for many years. In some cases, premixed 70/30 insulin is used for this purpose. Patient profiles of insulin levels resulting from this method, as shown in this figure, do not come close to matching the normal endogenous secretory pattern, shown in the shaded background. Patients with type 1 diabetes using this âsplit-mixedâ regimen rarely achieve reasonably good glycemic control by present standards, since they lack endogenous insulin to supplement the partially adequate profile of injected insulin. Type 2 diabetes patients who have substantial endogenous insulin may fare much better with this regimen, but may experience late morning or nocturnal hypoglycemia because of excessive levels of insulin at these times.
Berger M, Jorgens V, MĂźhlhauser I. Rationale for the use of insulin therapy alone as the pharmacological treatment of type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care. 1999;22(suppl 3):C71-C75; Edelman SV, Henry RR. Insulin therapy for normalizing glycosylated hemoglobin in type II diabetes: applications, benefits, and risks. Diabetes Reviews. 1995;3:308-334.
Slide 29
Twice-Daily Split-Mixed Regimens
Twice-daily mixtures of NPH and regular insulins have been widely used for type 2 diabetes for many years
Patient profiles of insulin levels shown in this slide do not come close to matching the normal endogenous secretory pattern seen in the shaded background
Dawn phenomenon refers to the early morning fall of tissue insulin sensitivity counteracted by increased insulin secretion in nondiabetic individuals but manifested as rising glycemia in diabetic patients
In some patients with marked dawn phenomenon, NPH insulin may be beneficial.Early morning hyperglycemia may also be managed by dividing the dose of NPH insulin between dinner and bedtime
Slide 23
Mimicking Nature: The Basal-Bolus Insulin Concept
This slide shows the pattern of normal peripheral plasma insulin (endogenous insulin) throughout the day in a normal-weight nondiabetic individual superimposed with the basal-bolus insulin strategy profile
The basal-bolus approach to insulin therapy combines basal insulin to meet the insulin requirement to suppress hepatic glucose production between meals and bolus insulin to meet the insulin requirement after eating. This strategy may reduce risk of hypoglycemia in individuals with erratic schedules or in individuals who have greater insulin requirements
Insulin analogs, such as insulin glargine, lispro, and aspart, appear to mimic basal and bolus insulin better than other available preparations
Slide 35
OAD Basal Insulin Therapy: Insulin Secretagogues or Sensitizers + Glargine at HS
Based on advances in insulin therapy, future regimens for type 2 diabetes patients might include the use of an injectable, long-acting basal insulin analog in combination with oral agents or possibly with inhaled human insulin
Addition of basal insulin glargine to a combination of oral agents can improve glycemic control, reducing glucotoxicity, which may in turn restore endogenous insulin response to SU and potentiate the effect of insulin sensitizers
Alternatively, long-acting insulin glargine can provide a basal insulin profile to be associated in the future with prandial inhaled insulin, which mimics normal insulin effects in response to meals
Slide 29
Twice-Daily Split-Mixed Regimens
Twice-daily mixtures of NPH and regular insulins have been widely used for type 2 diabetes for many years
Patient profiles of insulin levels shown in this slide do not come close to matching the normal endogenous secretory pattern seen in the shaded background
Dawn phenomenon refers to the early morning fall of tissue insulin sensitivity counteracted by increased insulin secretion in nondiabetic individuals but manifested as rising glycemia in diabetic patients
In some patients with marked dawn phenomenon, NPH insulin may be beneficial.Early morning hyperglycemia may also be managed by dividing the dose of NPH insulin between dinner and bedtime
Slide 23
Mimicking Nature: The Basal-Bolus Insulin Concept
This slide shows the pattern of normal peripheral plasma insulin (endogenous insulin) throughout the day in a normal-weight nondiabetic individual superimposed with the basal-bolus insulin strategy profile
The basal-bolus approach to insulin therapy combines basal insulin to meet the insulin requirement to suppress hepatic glucose production between meals and bolus insulin to meet the insulin requirement after eating. This strategy may reduce risk of hypoglycemia in individuals with erratic schedules or in individuals who have greater insulin requirements
Insulin analogs, such as insulin glargine, lispro, and aspart, appear to mimic basal and bolus insulin better than other available preparations
Slide 23
Mimicking Nature: The Basal-Bolus Insulin Concept
This slide shows the pattern of normal peripheral plasma insulin (endogenous insulin) throughout the day in a normal-weight nondiabetic individual superimposed with the basal-bolus insulin strategy profile
The basal-bolus approach to insulin therapy combines basal insulin to meet the insulin requirement to suppress hepatic glucose production between meals and bolus insulin to meet the insulin requirement after eating. This strategy may reduce risk of hypoglycemia in individuals with erratic schedules or in individuals who have greater insulin requirements
Insulin analogs, such as insulin glargine, lispro, and aspart, appear to mimic basal and bolus insulin better than other available preparations
Slide 23
Mimicking Nature: The Basal-Bolus Insulin Concept
This slide shows the pattern of normal peripheral plasma insulin (endogenous insulin) throughout the day in a normal-weight nondiabetic individual superimposed with the basal-bolus insulin strategy profile
The basal-bolus approach to insulin therapy combines basal insulin to meet the insulin requirement to suppress hepatic glucose production between meals and bolus insulin to meet the insulin requirement after eating. This strategy may reduce risk of hypoglycemia in individuals with erratic schedules or in individuals who have greater insulin requirements
Insulin analogs, such as insulin glargine, lispro, and aspart, appear to mimic basal and bolus insulin better than other available preparations
Objective: The exact contribution of postprandial and fasting glucose increments to overall hyperglycemia remain controversial. The discrepancies between the data published previously might be caused by the interference of several factors. To test the effects of overall glycemic control itself, the authors analyzed the diurnal glycemic profiles of type 2 diabetic patients investigated at different levels of HbA1c.
Design and Methods â In 290 non-insulin and non-acarbose using patients with T2DM, plasma glucose (PG) concentrations were determined at fasting (8AM) and during postprandial and postabsorptive periods (at 11AM, 2PM and 5PM). The areas under the curve above fasting PG (FPG) concentration (AUC1) and &gt;6.1 mmol/L (AUC2) were calculated for further evaluation of the relative contributions of postprandial PG (PPG) ([AUC1/AUC2] x 100 = %) and FPG ([AUC2-AUC1]/AUC2) x 100 = % increments to overall diurnal hyperglycemia. The data were compared over quintiles of A1c.Results â The relative contribution of PPG DECREASED progressively from the lowest (69.7%) to the highest quintile of A1c (30.5%, p&lt;0.001), whereas the relative contribution of FPG INCREASED gradually with increasing levels of A1c: 30.3% in the lowest to 69.5% in the highest quintile (p&lt;0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: The relative contribution of PPG excursions is predominant in fairly controlled patients, whereas the contribution of FPG hyperglycemia increases gradually with diabetes worsening. These results could therefore provide a unifying explanation for the discrepancies as observed in previous studies.
FIX FASTING FIRST!!
âContributions of Fasting and Postprandial Plasma Glucose Increments to the Overall Diurnal Hyperglycemia of Type 2 Diabetic Patientsâ â Louis Monnier, MD; Helene Lapinski, MD; and Claude Colette, PhD. Diab Care 26:881-885, 2003.
Slide 6-55
INSULIN TACTICS: THE FUTURE
Oral Agents + Mealtime Inhaled Insulin
Effect on HbA1c
The concept of inhaled insulin has been explored for those patients with type 2 diabetes who resist initiating insulin therapy because it requires injections. As a response to this resistance, a dry powder aerosol delivery system of human insulin has been developed. Weiss et al examined the ability of mealtime inhaled insulin to improve glycemic control in 69 subjects. Patients were randomized to a 3-month treatment period of either continued oral agents alone (sulfonylurea and/or metformin) or in combination with 1 or 2 puffs of inhaled insulin before meals. The inhaled insulin doses were titrated based on glucose testing 4 times daily. Patients continuing on oral agents alone showed little change in HbA1c at 12 weeks (â0.13%), while those receiving the inhaled insulin in addition to the oral agents exhibited a marked improvement in HbA1c (â2.28%).
Weiss SR, Berger S, Cheng S, Kourides I, Landschulz W, Gelfand RA, for the Phase II Inhaled Insulin Study Group. Diabetes. 1999;48(suppl 1):A12.
In addition to HbA1c-lowering effects, inhaled insulin consistently reduced fasting plasma glucose (FPG) levels to a significantly greater degree than SC insulin (as measured by 95% CIs). The baseline levels expressed in mg/dL are at the top of the bar and levels at end point are at the bottom. Values in parentheses are converted to mmol/L. Results from 3 different studies comparing inhaled insulin with SC insulin are shown on this slide. In the standard and intensive insulin therapy studies, the adjusted difference between inhaled insulin and SC insulin were -25.17 (95% CI, -43.39 to -6.95) and -39.53 (95% CI, -57.50 to -21.56), respectively. In the on insulin study, the adjusted difference was -15.88 (95% CI, -26.61 to -5.15).1,2
These reductions appear to be unrelated to the basal insulin dose administered the night before FPG measurement, and the mechanism for these changes is currently under investigation.
This slide demonstrates the key nutrition messages for the various insulin regimens described by Dr. Bergenstal. This information is also on Table 4 in the &quot;Guide to Starting and Adjusting Insulin for Type 2 Diabetes&quot;. Note also on the algorithm, that on the right side-bar, there are initial nutrition messages given.
For those patients put on a background insulin it helps glucose control if they control their carbohydrates throughout the day. A suggestion to get started is to tell the patient to have 3-4 carb choices per meal until they can consult with a dietitian
For those patients on a premixed insulin it is important to eat meals at consistent times and consistent amount of carbs. Snacks may be needed depending on the insulin mix, for example if it&apos;s a Regular,NPH mix and patient schedule
For the Background and mealtime regimen encourage the patient to start with a consistent carb intake at all meals. Generally snacks are not needed with this regimen. This regimen also allows for more flexibility in eating times and carb amounts. Once a patient is under control, you can teach what their insulin/carb ratio is which we&apos;ll adress later. This will add even more flexibility to their daily routine.
This slide reviews common comorbidities association with diabetes from the 2015 ADA guidelines.
Refer to source document for full recommendations, including level of evidence rating.
American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetesâ2015. Diabetes Care. 2015;38(suppl 1):S1-S93.
January 2014
This slide was created by Ashfield Healthcare Communications and was not associated with funding via an educational grant or a promotional/commercial interest.
This slide reviews recommendations for treating and managing hypertension in individuals with diabetes from the 2015 ADA guidelines.
Refer to source document for full recommendations, including level of evidence rating.
American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetesâ2015. Diabetes Care. 2015;38(suppl 1):S1-S93.
January 2014Any pharmacologic agents discussed are approved for use in the United States by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) unless otherwise noted. Consult individual prescribing information for approved uses outside of the United States.
This slide was created by Ashfield Healthcare Communications and was not associated with funding via an educational grant or a promotional/commercial interest.
This slide reviews recommendations for screening and treatment of diabetic neuropathy from the 2015 ADA guidelines.
Refer to source document for full recommendations, including level of evidence rating.
American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetesâ2015. Diabetes Care. 2015;38(suppl 1):S1-S93.
January 2014Any pharmacologic agents discussed are approved for use in the United States by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) unless otherwise noted. Consult individual prescribing information for approved uses outside of the United States.
This slide was created by Ashfield Healthcare Communications and was not associated with funding via an educational grant or a promotional/commercial interest.
This slide reviews recommendations for physical activity from the 2015 ADA guidelines.
Refer to source document for full recommendations, including level of evidence rating.
American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetesâ2015. Diabetes Care. 2015;38(suppl 1):S1-S93.
January 2014
This slide was created by Ashfield Healthcare Communications and was not associated with funding via an educational grant or a promotional/commercial interest.
This slide reviews physical activity recommendations in the presence of nonoptimal glycemic control from the 2015 ADA guidelines.
Refer to source document for full recommendations, including level of evidence rating.
American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetesâ2015. Diabetes Care. 2015;38(suppl 1):S1-S93.
January 2014
This slide was created by Ashfield Healthcare Communications and was not associated with funding via an educational grant or a promotional/commercial interest.
This slide reviews physical activity recommendations in the presence of diabetes complications from the 2015 ADA guidelines.
Refer to source document for full recommendations, including level of evidence rating.
American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetesâ2015. Diabetes Care. 2015;38(suppl 1):S1-S93.
January 2014
This slide was created by Ashfield Healthcare Communications and was not associated with funding via an educational grant or a promotional/commercial interest.
This slide reviews smoking cessation recommendations from the 2015 ADA guidelines.
Refer to source document for full recommendations, including level of evidence rating.
American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetesâ2015. Diabetes Care. 2015;38(suppl 1):S1-S93.
January 2014
This slide was created by Ashfield Healthcare Communications and was not associated with funding via an educational grant or a promotional/commercial interest.
This slide reviews considerations for psychosocial assessment and care from the 2015 ADA guidelines.
Refer to source document for full recommendations, including level of evidence rating.
American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetesâ2015. Diabetes Care. 2015;38(suppl 1):S1-S93.
January 2014
This slide was created by Ashfield Healthcare Communications and was not associated with funding via an educational grant or a promotional/commercial interest.
This slide reviews immunization recommendations from the 2015 ADA guidelines.
Refer to source document for full recommendations, including level of evidence rating.
American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetesâ2015. Diabetes Care. 2015;38(suppl 1):S1-S93.
January 2014
This slide was created by Ashfield Healthcare Communications and was not associated with funding via an educational grant or a promotional/commercial interest.
This slide reviews recommendations for bariatric surgery from the 2015 ADA guidelines.
Refer to source document for full recommendations, including level of evidence rating.
American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetesâ2015. Diabetes Care. 2015;38(suppl 1):S1-S93.
January 2014This slide was created by Ashfield Healthcare Communications and was not associated with funding via an educational grant or a promotional/commercial interest.
This slide reviews recommendations for antiplatelet therapy from the 2015 ADA guidelines.
Refer to source document for full recommendations, including level of evidence rating.
American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetesâ2015. Diabetes Care. 2015;38(suppl 1):S1-S93.
January 2014Any pharmacologic agents discussed are approved for use in the United States by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) unless otherwise noted. Consult individual prescribing information for approved uses outside of the United States.
This slide was created by Ashfield Healthcare Communications and was not associated with funding via an educational grant or a promotional/commercial interest.
This slide reviews recommendations for screening and treatment of coronary heart disease from the 2015 ADA guidelines.
Refer to source document for full recommendations, including level of evidence rating.
American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetesâ2015. Diabetes Care. 2015;38(suppl 1):S1-S93.
January 2014Any pharmacologic agents discussed are approved for use in the United States by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) unless otherwise noted. Consult individual prescribing information for approved uses outside of the United States.
This slide was created by Ashfield Healthcare Communications and was not associated with funding via an educational grant or a promotional/commercial interest.
This slide reviews recommendations for screening and treatment of diabetic retinopathy from the 2015 ADA guidelines.
Refer to source document for full recommendations, including level of evidence rating.
American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetesâ2015. Diabetes Care. 2015;38(suppl 1):S1-S93.
January 2014Any pharmacologic agents discussed are approved for use in the United States by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) unless otherwise noted. Consult individual prescribing information for approved uses outside of the United States.
This slide was created by Ashfield Healthcare Communications and was not associated with funding via an educational grant or a promotional/commercial interest.
This slide reviews recommendations for screening and treatment of diabetic neuropathy from the 2015 ADA guidelines.
Refer to source document for full recommendations, including level of evidence rating.
American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetesâ2015. Diabetes Care. 2015;38(suppl 1):S1-S93.
January 2014Any pharmacologic agents discussed are approved for use in the United States by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) unless otherwise noted. Consult individual prescribing information for approved uses outside of the United States.
This slide was created by Ashfield Healthcare Communications and was not associated with funding via an educational grant or a promotional/commercial interest.
This slide reviews recommendations for foot care management in diabetes from the 2015 ADA guidelines.
Refer to source document for full recommendations, including level of evidence rating.
American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetesâ2015. Diabetes Care. 2015;38(suppl 1):S1-S93.
January 2014
This slide was created by Ashfield Healthcare Communications and was not associated with funding via an educational grant or a promotional/commercial interest.
This slide reviews recommendations for managing diabetes in older adults from the 2015 ADA guidelines.
Refer to source document for full recommendations, including level of evidence rating.
American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetesâ2015. Diabetes Care. 2015;38(suppl 1):S1-S93.
January 2014
Any pharmacologic agents discussed are approved for use in the United States by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) unless otherwise noted. Consult individual prescribing information for approved uses outside of the United States.
This slide was created by Ashfield Healthcare Communications and was not associated with funding via an educational grant or a promotional/commercial interest.
This slide reviews recommendations for pharmacologic therapy to treat and manage diabetes in older adults from the 2015 ADA guidelines.
Refer to source document for full recommendations, including level of evidence rating.
American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetesâ2015. Diabetes Care. 2015;38(suppl 1):S1-S93.
January 2014
Any pharmacologic agents discussed are approved for use in the United States by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) unless otherwise noted. Consult individual prescribing information for approved uses outside of the United States.
This slide was created by Ashfield Healthcare Communications and was not associated with funding via an educational grant or a promotional/commercial interest.
This slide reviews glycemic targets for children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes from the 2015 ADA guidelines.
Refer to source document for full recommendations, including level of evidence rating.
American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetesâ2015. Diabetes Care. 2015;38(suppl 1):S1-S93.
January 2014
This slide was created by Ashfield Healthcare Communications and was not associated with funding via an educational grant or a promotional/commercial interest.
This slide reviews recommendations for screening for autoimmunities in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes from the 2015 ADA guidelines.
Refer to source document for full recommendations, including level of evidence rating.
American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetesâ2015. Diabetes Care. 2015;38(suppl 1):S1-S93.
January 2014
This slide was created by Ashfield Healthcare Communications and was not associated with funding via an educational grant or a promotional/commercial interest.
This slide reviews recommendations for treating and managing hypertension in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes from the 2015 ADA guidelines.
Refer to source document for full recommendations, including level of evidence rating.
American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetesâ2015. Diabetes Care. 2015;38(suppl 1):S1-S93.
January 2014
Any pharmacologic agents discussed are approved for use in the United States by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) unless otherwise noted. Consult individual prescribing information for approved uses outside of the United States.
This slide was created by Ashfield Healthcare Communications and was not associated with funding via an educational grant or a promotional/commercial interest.
This slide reviews recommendations for treating and managing dyslipidemia in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes from the 2015 ADA guidelines.
Refer to source document for full recommendations, including level of evidence rating.
American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetesâ2015. Diabetes Care. 2015;38(suppl 1):S1-S93.
January 2014
Any pharmacologic agents discussed are approved for use in the United States by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) unless otherwise noted. Consult individual prescribing information for approved uses outside of the United States.
This slide was created by Ashfield Healthcare Communications and was not associated with funding via an educational grant or a promotional/commercial interest.
This slide reviews recommendations for treating and managing microvascular complications in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes from the 2015 ADA guidelines.
Refer to source document for full recommendations, including level of evidence rating.
American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetesâ2015. Diabetes Care. 2015;38(suppl 1):S1-S93.
January 2014
Any pharmacologic agents discussed are approved for use in the United States by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) unless otherwise noted. Consult individual prescribing information for approved uses outside of the United States.
This slide was created by Ashfield Healthcare Communications and was not associated with funding via an educational grant or a promotional/commercial interest.
This slide reviews pre- and post-diagnostic considerations in children and adolescents with type 1 diabetes from the 2015 ADA guidelines.
Refer to source document for full recommendations, including level of evidence rating.
American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetesâ2015. Diabetes Care. 2015;38(suppl 1):S1-S93.
January 2014
This slide was created by Ashfield Healthcare Communications and was not associated with funding via an educational grant or a promotional/commercial interest.
This slide reviews recommendations for management of diabetes during pregnancy from the 2015 ADA guidelines.
Refer to source document for full recommendations, including level of evidence rating.
American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetesâ2015. Diabetes Care. 2015;38(suppl 1):S1-S93.
January 2014
This slide was created by Ashfield Healthcare Communications and was not associated with funding via an educational grant or a promotional/commercial interest.
This slide reviews recommendations for treatment and management of hypertension during pregnancy from the 2015 ADA guidelines.
Refer to source document for full recommendations, including level of evidence rating.
American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetesâ2015. Diabetes Care. 2015;38(suppl 1):S1-S93.
January 2014Any pharmacologic agents discussed are approved for use in the United States by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) unless otherwise noted. Consult individual prescribing information for approved uses outside of the United States.
This slide was created by Ashfield Healthcare Communications and was not associated with funding via an educational grant or a promotional/commercial interest.
This slide reviews recommendations for the use of insulin during pregnancy from the 2015 ADA guidelines.
Refer to source document for full recommendations, including level of evidence rating.
American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetesâ2015. Diabetes Care. 2015;38(suppl 1):S1-S93.
January 2014Any pharmacologic agents discussed are approved for use in the United States by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) unless otherwise noted. Consult individual prescribing information for approved uses outside of the United States.
This slide was created by Ashfield Healthcare Communications and was not associated with funding via an educational grant or a promotional/commercial interest.
This slide reviews recommendations for diabetes care, treatment, and management in the hospital from the 2015 ADA guidelines.
Refer to source document for full recommendations, including level of evidence rating.
American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetesâ2015. Diabetes Care. 2015;38(suppl 1):S1-S93.
January 2014
Any pharmacologic agents discussed are approved for use in the United States by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) unless otherwise noted. Consult individual prescribing information for approved uses outside of the United States.
This slide was created by Ashfield Healthcare Communications and was not associated with funding via an educational grant or a promotional/commercial interest.
This slide reviews glycemic targets and treatment recommendations for critically ill patients with diabetes from the 2015 ADA guidelines.
Refer to source document for full recommendations, including level of evidence rating.
American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetesâ2015. Diabetes Care. 2015;38(suppl 1):S1-S93.
January 2014
Any pharmacologic agents discussed are approved for use in the United States by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) unless otherwise noted. Consult individual prescribing information for approved uses outside of the United States.
This slide was created by Ashfield Healthcare Communications and was not associated with funding via an educational grant or a promotional/commercial interest.
This slide reviews glycemic targets and treatment recommendations for non-critically ill patients with diabetes from the 2015 ADA guidelines.
Refer to source document for full recommendations, including level of evidence rating.
American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetesâ2015. Diabetes Care. 2015;38(suppl 1):S1-S93.
January 2014
Any pharmacologic agents discussed are approved for use in the United States by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) unless otherwise noted. Consult individual prescribing information for approved uses outside of the United States.
This slide was created by Ashfield Healthcare Communications and was not associated with funding via an educational grant or a promotional/commercial interest.
This slide reviews recommendations for cystic fibrosis-related diabetes from the 2015 ADA guidelines.
Refer to source document for full recommendations, including level of evidence rating.
American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetesâ2015. Diabetes Care. 2015;38(suppl 1):S1-S93.
January 2014
Any pharmacologic agents discussed are approved for use in the United States by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) unless otherwise noted. Consult individual prescribing information for approved uses outside of the United States.
This slide was created by Ashfield Healthcare Communications and was not associated with funding via an educational grant or a promotional/commercial interest.
This slide reviews considerations for monogenic diabetes syndromes in children and adolescents from the 2015 ADA guidelines.
Refer to source document for full recommendations, including level of evidence rating.
American Diabetes Association. Standards of medical care in diabetesâ2015. Diabetes Care. 2015;38(suppl 1):S1-S93.
January 2014
Any pharmacologic agents discussed are approved for use in the United States by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) unless otherwise noted. Consult individual prescribing information for approved uses outside of the United States.
This slide was created by Ashfield Healthcare Communications and was not associated with funding via an educational grant or a promotional/commercial interest.