ARTIFICIAL GENERAL INTELLIGENCETREES PROJECT LOGBOOKBy Andrew Hennessey, 1991INTRODUCTIONThe premis for overcoming the par...
At the turn of the 20th century, Logical Realists Russell andWittgenstein already laid the foundations of this way of seei...
TREES – PHASE1 [Isomorphism between 2 domains]OverviewIt would be hard to tell at this point where the delays are going to...
However the TREES system uses universal laws and processesand its data is related to empirical scales. There will be no ce...
b) isomorphism between a macro and micro domain           model1 Geography to Marine biology        c) data output systems...
Upcoming SlideShare
Loading in …5
×

Artificial General Intelligence

755 views

Published on

This is the timeline for phase 1 of an artificial intelligence project that could produce a true industrial revolution in computation, making possible many of the technologies we see operating in fantasy star trek environments. There are solutions to allegedly insoluble paradoxes on offer to the investor

Published in: Investor Relations
  • Be the first to comment

  • Be the first to like this

Artificial General Intelligence

  1. 1. ARTIFICIAL GENERAL INTELLIGENCETREES PROJECT LOGBOOKBy Andrew Hennessey, 1991INTRODUCTIONThe premis for overcoming the paradox that stops all the star trektechnologies from happening actually isnt rocket science - its prettyobvious. Currently computers trying to work things out about theuniverse are dealing with an infinity of objects and arbitrary names wegive them which dont mean anything - as a result the computer getsconfused and cant stop processing infinity and this is called the Haltingproblem which science will tell you - cannot be solved - ever.But that’s just untrue - for at a more atomic level - by way of analogy -every infinite object in infinity is actually made up of a limited number ofatomic elements e.g. around 200. If we had an AI computer working withan atomic perspective and labelling classes of objects as transactionswith atomic descriptions and their relationships – an AI process thatsaw the universe in terms of transactions, we would not have a problemcomputing infinite objects and events with such a reference system.This is because there can only ever be a limited and closed number oftypes/classes of logical atomic transactions - rather like the limitedclosed set of elements in the periodic table of chemistry - thereforethere is No Halting problem in such computation with such atomicrelativity.There is a closed and finite number of Logical transactions of the formA to B through a common C with the intercession of some D. I call thisthe Language [A] of which there are only 729 outcomes. That is 27transaction events at time1 and 729 at time2This system of relativity was first developed by Andrew Hennessey in1991 and is called Tripartite Essentialism. It is a General SystemsTheory that applies to the natural world via a six part universal processmodel for all objects and transactions.
  2. 2. At the turn of the 20th century, Logical Realists Russell andWittgenstein already laid the foundations of this way of seeing things -they called it Logical Atomism.I not only have a programmable solution to the Halting problem but havedeveloped a process that could potentially be at the heart of aninterstellar industrial revolution - making possible all the visions oftechnology we see in Star trek.Phase 1 of the TREES ‘Tripartite Essentialism Expert System’ project.Once the entire system has been developed – it could then be applied asan Expert System ‘Shell’ at the heart of many different hitek projects.In this draft there are probably several missing intermediate stages buthopefully you will see the whole plan in brief.A successfully completed TREES project would supply the cornerstoneof an interstellar industrial revolution in; robotics, guidance, scanningand deep range teleportation.The goal for Phase 1 of this project is to produce isomorphism between2 domains. The Phase 2 goal is to produce isomorphism between alldomains.I hope that this meets with your expectations and if you have anyquestions, or, ideas that you would like to see more fully articulated letme know and I will revise the draft.
  3. 3. TREES – PHASE1 [Isomorphism between 2 domains]OverviewIt would be hard to tell at this point where the delays are going tobe and where the shortcuts can be properly acquired. If thediscovery of Artificial General Intelligence has been seen to totallyfail – its probably in the use of some of the pre-existing ITmodules as well as the presence of infinite recursion in itscomputational models. i.e. the Halting ProblemTRE solves the latter problem.The project can be divided into independently developed modules.PHASE 1 of the TREES project is about getting the mappingsystem to operate with biological data between two different scalesand environments. In model1 the exchanges take place betweengeography and marine biology.Anyone consulted about the TREES system need not know theuniversal intentions of the overall project, but would only need toknow that it’s a general systems theory which pertains to biologyand biological systems.We can later develop the universal organic analogy in relation toother data sets e.g. particle physics and cosmologyTwo other software projects can be developed independently. 1. the Prolog logic language hybrid – [HX] PROLOG or alternative 2. The data acquisition software which is intended to scan the syntax of the English language in scientific articles to pick out nouns, verbs and adjectives and bulk convert these using a developed empirical scale into TREES database data.The strategy with Phase 1 of this project is to get a mappingprocess calibrated and working to deliver switching between twotypes of data model.The central theme of critique is the debate of ‘sign to thingsignified’ and arbitrary relationships within the model.
  4. 4. However the TREES system uses universal laws and processesand its data is related to empirical scales. There will be no centraluse of arbitrary labels and processes common to previous failuresin Artificial Intelligence.Subsequent phases of this project will model and predict maps forother knowledge domains e.g. the subatomic or cosmology. E.g.cosmological data can be independently verified.Once the mapping project is refined it could then be developedand applied to e.g. steering atomic mutation, scanning, roboticsPHASE1 [Isomorphism between 2 domains – 5 years] 1. SYSTEM ARCHITECTURE RESEARCH [4 months] a) input-process-output descriptions b) component evaluation c) [HX] PROLOG or alternatives 2. Consultation with Applications specialist [2 months] a) which High level language b) How to implement proposed data structures c) Portability d) Which InputProcessOutput model 3. Database design/coding [1.5 years] a) Coding of design b) Location of IT lab work c) Testing of framework for 729 maps d) Anomaly assessment 4. Data acquisition software (R&D) [1.5 years] a) Object database – allocation of empirical values b) R&D Data acquisition software c) Refining data 5. Testing of mapping system with data and query [1.5 years] a) development of proposed query system
  5. 5. b) isomorphism between a macro and micro domain model1 Geography to Marine biology c) data output systems/formats/displayRef:http://offtheplanet.blogspot.com/2009/11/interdimensional-cosmology.htmlhttp://offtheplanet.blogspot.com/2011/08/fundamental-assumptions-of-tripartite.htmlhttp://offtheplanet.blogspot.com/2011/08/interstellarinterdimensional-operating.htmlhttp://offtheplanet.blogspot.com/2012/03/christ-and-cosmos.html

×