1. •@
G
o
C Special Designated Court for Riot Cases, at Ahmedabad
f!:
JUDGMENTf)
e in
e Sessions Case No.152 of 2002
e with
e Sessions Case No.167 of 2003
•
with
• Sessions Case No.279 of 2003
e with
Sessions Case No.190 of 2009
•
•
with
•
•e
S~s~i()ns Case No.191 of 2009
.. with ... ....
SessioIls Case No.193of 2009 .
withe
SeSsions Case No.194 of 2009G
} ..••. with
o ' .. :.::::::.". .:
Sessions Case No.195 of 2009Q~::
c:.;, </ withV
S~~si6nsCaseNo.279 of 2009~ .-:'-::-::>:-::
o
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
INDEX
PART · ... )·i> PARTICULARS PAGE NOS.
I Facts, details. With regard to documents, list of 5 to 65
witnesses and rel~varit exhibits
II (a) Arguments on behalf of Prosecution 66 to 411
(b) Arguments on behalf of Victims 411 to 432
,
III (a) Arguments on behalf of Defence 433 to 705
(b) Rejoinder arguments by Prosecution 705 to 726
(c) Rejoinder arguments by Defence 726 to 741
IV Reasons, findings, final order and judgment 742 to 1341
3. ·
•••
••••••
•e
e
@
£) SCs/152/02.167 & 279/03, 190,191,193,194,195,279/09 1
~.-:~::;
Before the Special Designated Court
o
o
@
o
f)
C'i.'~"':~)
o
0.:..~;
~
e
~
e
o
Sessions Case No.152 of 2002
with
Sessions Case No.167 of 2003
with
Sessions Case No.279 of 2003
with
Sessions Case No.190 of 2009
with
Sessions Case No.191 of 2009
with
Sessions Case No.193 of 2009
with
Sessions Case No.194 of 2009
with
Sessions Case No.195 of 2009
with
Sessions Case No.279 of 2009
.~
.,
jj
jj
ir
i'
I
I
Judgment
i~
at Ahmedabad
~
o Complainant state of Gujarat
@
A versusV
~ Accused
t)
A
Sessions Case No.152 of 2002~
()
1) KAlLAS LALCHAND DHOBI (IN JUDICIAL CUSTODY)
G 2) YOGENDRASINH @ LALO MOHANSINH SEKHAWAT
o 3) SURENDRASINH @ VAKIL DIGVIJAYSINH CHAUHAN
4) MANGAJI POKARJI MARWADIo
5) JAYESH RAMUBHAI PATNIN
o 6) KISHORBHAI MANGABHAI PATNI
e 7) SHAILESH KALUBHAI PATNI
G 8) KANAIYA @ BABLU CHAICHAU
9) KANTIBHAI POPATBHAI PATNI
G
10) SAKRABHAI SENDHABHAI PATNI
G 11) MANOJKUMAR PREMJIBHAI PARMAR
e 12) DEEPAKKUMAR SOMABHAI SOLANKI
13) VINODBHAI ARVINDBHAI SOLANKI
14) JAYESHKUMAR @ GABBAR MAGANLAL JINGER (MOCHI)• 15) AJAY SOMABHAI PANCHAL
16) DILIP @ KALU CHATURBHAI PARMAR
~._.;:-
..... '.i i ';"~
/ . ,- .. ;-".":It/': .,'.,.I .9 ,.~,r• .- "'.J" ,--_. -... ... '"
,,,•• y" '~"" ,.,~f'-' '.......: ,; ,.
l~ ,« :."':,,,~~; (t~~ :}--....::: 0
- J.t:i;4 ;.nmlC:i~~.~~~~p (",
1ft I: i '.' :", i;~~~x.1 ·~:··.f ;:....-t
p.i ..... f '" ':' ("'" ~j
~;~~~,2~?,:;~~~;~
.........o<:~::.::::~::>;.~_;~~ .
,<
~
I~':
.'
.:.:
r
4. ••
••••
~• ;~~~ ::~
~
ff:l ;j;
()
o.'.)-' SCsIl52102,167 & 279/03, 190,191,193,194,195,279/09 2 Judgment
('.;C}
:...;;'
17) RATILAL GANESHJI KUMBHAR (Abated)
() 18) SANJAYKUMAR SHANKARBHAI PATNI
(j 19) SHAILESH NATWARLAL PATNI
o 20) NARESH @ NARIYO BANSILAL~0'
A,
x::.:)
Sessions Case No.167 of 2003
@
C 21) SANDEEP @ SONU RAMPRAKASH MEHRA
22) BABUBHAI MOHANBHAI PATNIG
e
••
23) BABUBHAI MANJIBHAI PATNI
Sessions Case No.279 of 2003
24)
25)
26)
e 27)
l j~ 28)
29)
(:)'
30)
t'::'i
8
31)
C; 32)
r'''' 33)j.3
r:·"
34)
t~:: )
35)
(lJ 36)
() 37)
e'
o
SHANKARJI HAKAJI MALI
MANGILAL DHUPCHAND JAIN
PANNALAL @ PRABHU MOCHI
GOPALDAS MANDAS VAISHNAV
PRAHLADJI RAJUJI ASORI
MUKESH PUKHRAJ SANKHLA (MOCHI)
MADANLAL DHANRAJ RAVAL
MAHENDRA MULCHANDBHAI PARMAR
AMBESH KANTILAL JINGAR (MOCHI)
PRAHLAD OMPRAKASH SONGARA
KRISHNAKUMAR @ KRISHNA (SON
ASOK @ ASLO DHARSINH THAKOR
CHlRAG DILIP SHAH
PRAKASH @ KALI KHENGARJI
Sessions Case No.190 of 2009(.~
S.J
4-'01
%:1 38) MANISH PRABHULAL JAIN
39) MUKESH ATMARAM THAKORo
(c:.~
'-J
Sessions Case No.191 of 2009
o
PRAJAPATI
PUNJABI (IN JUDICIAL CUSTODY)
(Abated)
PREMCHAND SISODIYA
(Abated)
PADHIYAR
A
Y 40) PARBATSINH TARSANSING @ DARSHANSINH DARPANSINH
@
If::':;, Sessions Case No.193 of 2009
~
C"."
41) JAYESH RAMJIBHAI PARMAR (IN JUDICIAL C_~~~~~~.
ou
Sessions Case No,194 of 2009~
42) RAJU @ MAMO KANIYO RAMAVTAR TIWARI@
43) NARAYAN SITARAM TANK @ NARAN CHENALWALO
G (IN JUDICIAL CUSTODY)
OF CHAMPABEN)
(Abated)
/";~' '... )C(::11- ] :"'~.
/(/ •••,1 ':'_"'~""'-"""-...:: t: ..."
/.~~/i.:o~>:J·:',;, ':;'~;...'.::;(~)
(IN ~:~:~;r~··,'c~~t~DX:~.:J~:~~C}.·'
@ N~~~! r(1)HIYQ:;,i,>; ~.l C:j
n ) {TJ L
," ".Ii- , ), .'
'~: 1 j ; -V"') '_...1.:
:'" ::~>~'" _, 1',--:",'; ";'F ).+ Ii
'1 1..' , "A.' '1 ~" .l" V -', !J
~~ .~.)' .'~._.....:: '~:~..r'~"~i"~"A<r::<~) /~
.,... ! ...",,;-, .--,--••_.~'C' ;.-'" /..'1'
':". "n.;1 ;-..•-", ,.} "-~., ...-::"~....... " '-"; C"': , i~ ........-""
~i~,,:-~~:.-l..: ..._'_~::;;.~
~-......--~
v
6. f-;.
..~~.
~
,~ I~
I,~:
SCS/152/02,167 & 279/03, 190,191,193,194,195,279/09 4 Judgment
JUDGMENT
1. All the present proceedings relate to
and arise out of what has been recognized as one of
the most heinous incidents of a communal riot, where
.,
no less than 69 victims of a particular community
'~
were done to death by a mob of large number of.-;,~
~
persons, of whom the present accused are, in terms.-,.,.,
of the Prosecution case, involved therein and the
present proceedings are known and referred to as the
"Gulbarg Society Massacre Case". The horrific
incident in question took place on 28/02/2002. The
subsequent sessions are on account of the
subsequent arrest of accused and filing of
supplementary chargesheet which gave rise to
"~ separate proceedings. However, since all these cases
arose out of the same incident, vide order dated
23/07/2009 passed below Exh.97, the proceedings were
j}
ordered to stand consolidated and even a
'~
consolidated charge has been framed herein.
~:
2. It is required to be noted that there
$'
;~
were initially 66 accused facing trial, of whom
acclised Nos.17, 23, 27, 35, 45 and 61 have passed
away during the pendency of the present proceedings
and therefore, the trial has
such six of the accused.
continued to proceed against
such trial has ultimately
judgment.
stood abated against
The t r ip..J;,~,,:c::~h;~ t hus
/~'~"'" f~, I':' i::''':~
tot a .;(.-./6 O".a,eg'Q.~:e:q.)';~n d
.f ." '., " ~. ~""""1 "",,1 ""
led/' t'o . 'th<e~' ~:~p:2el~~~
. .. . ~, ....0{:...... ~ i. ~ ~'"~
".:;' ,,: ~ 'c::)~ , .'" ~.:; . ~ ':(1!i
, ".~ , ( .......~"
', ,<' <,.,:,;~':;; :r~;(, If+ ~J
;-.. ,,-;' '.. ' :.:. ' '.).' '<'''~' /"
"'<~01~I~.7 .
7. ::
~:
•e
IE~
:."
e :~~
~o !:.
iC?, ,.
l~> SCs/152/02,167 & 279/03, 190,191,193,194,195,279/09 5 Judgment l.~
o
~.~
~~
()
(:)
£1~J'
o
~
~~:/
f~
£.~{.~...
G
•••
o•
o
u~
rCh,
~';i
~
f:)
~
~
e
o
@
e
~
~
~
":.'~
@~.
e
~
e..~
o
()
o
~
G
G
•
e
•
•
~--
3. For the sake of convenience, the present Ie
[:
judgment has been divided into four integral parts
as per the following details:
Part - I
Part - II
Part - III
Part - IV
Facts, details with regard to
documents, list of witnesses and
relevant exhibits.
Arguments on behalf of:
(a) Prosecution
(b) Victims
(a) Arguments on behalf of Defence
(b) Rejoinder arguments by
Prosecution
(c) Rejoinder arguments by Defence
Reasons, findings, final order and
judgment
*********
PART - I
:;
4. The accused are attributed to have
committed offences punishable under Secs.120(B),
143, 147, 148, 153(A) (1) (a), (b), 153(A) (2), 186, 188,
201, 217, 218, 295, 302, 307, 323, 324, 332, 337,
376 (2) (g), 396, 397,
read together with
Penal Code and under
Act, and of the 60
21, 41, 42, 43, 63
398, 435, 436, 447, 44.2,,,,,,~J.l2- 452,
.r"i>.' _."......,.,........,........_..;.~ ....
Secs. 34 and 149 ,~~~'t'j:i,~PfP~{l
Sec .135 (1)
accused,
and 64
//.:,.:/,,-/- ._'......'" ~,
of t~'~')'~6nwa-y~:91:l--'c~'1
accus~¥':.~;~3"~·~ii:;:.?'h4 ··~;.l·~,:)~~. ~ ..... '..... ,. ,- " 'j • "-"',~~:"
are hiQ~i'E:d tbciil al~t;:,:jl
i'<;~~,}::=-~~;;~!J
I'
t·:
I
8. •••••
-•• 1
o '::~.""'::'.
!~ :,'(:;)
:~
:-:
~
~;;" SCs/152/02,167 & 279/03, 190,191,193,194,195,279/09 6 Judgment
l'i.
~-:
o l:~.
I ~ '.
throughout the proceedings and are in jUdicial ,',@ I::
custody for more than 12 years. Some of the accused f:',
~ ...:
1':'
~,',,':';
0' I"
~ have been enlarged on bail pending trial and some of
tGf
~...~)~ the accused been as accused~ have arraigned
{) consequent to applications tendered by the victims
~w who have been permitted by the Hon'ble Supreme Court
~
'&,J'
to play a proactive role in the present proceedings
o and in furtherance thereof, such victims preferred
e
•• applications under Sec. 319 of the Cr.P.C. for
arraignment of persons as accused herein, which has
resulted incidentally in the original complainant
who was a Police Officer holding the rank of
••
••
e
••
•
-';:
Inspector of Police (P. I. ) to be arraigned as an
[,
accused herein. It is required to be noted that the ",'t"
lee:
1-.'
•G
injured victims and surviving family members of f"·-:
persons who had lost their lives in the present
incident, have even moved the Hon' ble Apex Court
• from time to time which has resulted in a Special
Investigation Team (to be referred to herein after
•e
~.
as "the SIT" for short) being formed, with
directions given by the Hon'ble Supreme Court from
time to time. The Hon'ble Supreme Court even I~~
o
£:f appointed Amicus Curiae oversee the~ an to
o functioning of the Special Investigation Team and
t}
in fact the investigation of the SIT into the
e present offence as also seven other related
o incidents of communal carnages in Gujarat in the
o
year 2002 were being actively monito:r;,E;d::c:.·;ffT~:'::~e
e ;>"/ '> '; ) i ,'.' i """,:~
Hon' ble Supreme Court from time to ti}rt¥:·'~,:~DJ,:~11:h.·~i~:¥::~
•
J'.... ,'~ 'I' ;,< ',;..'..~~-- ~j:~ ~'~... !""'-".~ ...
the Hon' ble Supreme Court vide.{,,:.:q':t:_~er:~;}<;~f-~~"~_~<':'
• -I I , - . ";. ~: ~ .. ...., ~..... ..... -.~
14/11/2014, came to the conclusion t~at;ltJ;1erE)':"vv~s 'no~C:jJ
~~i~~;:~t/~:;..-
9. ,
•••
•••
•••••
6
• ;~'
~
"~~
•e ,PA
g"
SCs/152/02,167 • 279103, 190,191,193,194,195,279109 7 Judgment
o further need to monitor the investigation any
e further and the Hon'bleR"'>.~;J
direction to the trial@
in its entirety leadingo
tlJ is also required
o circumstances, the
£.:"
"<...~
to be belonging
AU
A
proceedings where the present incident has
~
admittedly come into scrutiny of the international
G
community at large. It is in the background of suchG
C facts and circumstances that the Prosecution case in
., a nutshell, is required to be narrated briefly as
••
o
•
herein after follows.
5 . It is the Prosecution case that a
horrific incident took place at the Godhra Railway
Station on 27/02/2002 when a train carrying
'Karsevaks' returning from Ayodhya, was allegedly
8 attacked by members of
~,".'
~
coaches of the train
e
Karsevaks travelling in
G
permitted to get out of such burning coaches ando
(] were ultimately set afire and burnt alive. It is the
o case of the Prosecution that in response to such
e incident, a number of Organizations/Institutions
o• gave a Bandh call and it is also the case of the
Prosecution that the charred and burnt bodies of
such Karsevaks were being brought t~<~~r
being handed over to their rel~-¥.i:~~'~'·:,;..,~<:3'~~~~
• process for
Incidentally,
to
Supreme Court has issued a
Court to conclude the trial
to the present judgment. It
be noted that in such
present proceedings can be said
to a very different class of
the minority community and
were set afire and the
such train coaches were not
their final rites,//.:q,il.}~28102l~~9),2.)
according to the U§;~~~'i~CUri~~,". t~)}
·"·~~I;_JJJ;J
~:'
i-·
(::
IS
"
t~
~
i . .
:.~
i
i:
tt
I .
, .
I
r".'
l
I
10. ••••
••••••••
~:
~:
:;:
:~:••
•
@
~ i'
~7 SCs/152/02,167 & 279/03, 190,191,193,194,195,279/09 8 Judgment
o Bandh call was also given for 28/02/2002. It is the
o case of the Prosecution that in furtherance of theEft"'lL:.~
said Bandh call, various localities came under heavye
@ Police bandobast since there were perceived
R0,
e communally sensitive localities of Ahmedabad.
tf':"
'0'Y other hand, the Police Station within
u
~
jurisdiction the Gulbarg Society fell,
@
to be
On the
whose
was
Meghaninagar Police Station which was not perceived
e
to be a very communally sensitive locality. It is
the case of the Prosecution that in furtherance of
and in an effort to rigidly enforce the Bandh call,
mobs started gathering in the present locality where
e the present incident has taken place and incidents
c of stone throwing, arson, looting and setting afire
6
of vehicles belonging to the minority community as(j
also forcing down the shopkeepers to shut shops, hado
o commenced right since the morning of the fateful
o day. It is the case of the Prosecution that a number
~
of incidents took place surrounding Gulbarg Society
o (which would be narrated at length and in great
o
detail in the course of the present judgment) whichfj
rresulted in heightening of tension in the vicinitye r
c
o of Gulbarg Society and its surrounding
e neighbourhood. It is the Prosecution case that
G Gulbarg Society was occupied by members of the
G
minority community, of whom an elected Member of
o
Parliament (ex-MP) Shri Ehsan Jafri was 9~e:::~·(:}f~~-be
e ~~~~-::..,-:~... ~ :.... (~~.j /~~ .:.~:,:':'..
residents of the said Gulbarg societl?~~.~:t",··±s-<":.t?he.',,:,,
l/ ~,._>~j _<~t .~"( "'. l.,~' i ~ -...
case of the Prosecution that the ~~trj?;~~f.::s,·~~~,:;/t:(~~:i;'~·_'.
minority community were also residin~Uih''h.ou·se's and !':1" ~
l'i ,-, " , : ",.,.1 H
chawla which were inhabited by membJf~):if b61:h" th~):)
~2j!:"?J8Y
12. 6
•
•e
G SCs/l52/02,167 & 279/03, 190,191,193,194,195,279/09 10
~
~
shelter in Gulbarg Society and the mob was
e
for a short while. However, no sooner
e
Police force go away to other arease
() localities of Ahmedabad which were also
e being impacted and affected by the Bandh call as
e also similar incidents of arson and rioting, that
e the mob gathered in large numbers and some amongst
•
e the present accused according to the Prosecution,
• who were armed with deadly weapons like swords,
knives, trishools as also inflammable material,
started inciting the mob to commit further and more
••A
~ gruesome atrocities on the members of the minority
e:"
V
community who had taken shelter within the residence
C":>
'0-1
of Shri Ehsan Jafri. It is the case of the
()
c} Prosecution that a series of incidents took place,
~)
beginning from about 11: 00 a .m. and went on tillC-)
A
l.:./ about 04;30 p.m., the details of which would be
:.:;,(~0
provided at length herein after, which ultimately
(s~
~J
resulted in the
C'!!
V
fire on the mob
()
grave and serious@
A the mob and also';~
C·)',' :/ persons of
c....c:) Prosecution
If''''',o enraged and
C~
~I
efforts of
®
the
that
(::) of the incident,
C?;. repeated firing of~
A," from their weapons~
deceased Shri Ehsan Jafri to open
with his licensed shotgun, causing
injuries to a number of members of
resulted in the death of one of the
mob. It is the case of the
this resulted in the mob being
incited beyond control and despite the
the Police officers posted at the scene
~ the enraged mob could not
~ the case of the Prosecution
~
•••
Judgment
dispersed
did such
and other
similarly
despite the Police resorting to
teargas shells and"a:I;:s~~:'~-tl>_,"d'~"'''' ..) !.....,I' ~....A' ~.,.. ...")...t
in an effort to cglrl~;,t'o/;:-""{h~'~1S';:
',".'. J ,,;."-,r-,.. .., (1 1
f: > • ',~ ,_, "....... ~,,~, , • '. ,
be contr¢'·r~~iq.2·an:~N:;~t·0'()
; / ~.~ ,~,-! / ';~~:~;.'};j ,......, t~' i;;
that thr~:r-f~,. co~~gK~sin~<i:';Jj
'( ,}, , c;;.}:,:2'~:-~~ '4>(f ~-!/I!'~
'~", ,l ' C'~ , /.J,:.t. ;
;;:~:~~~i'1:;Y
."4i
:~:
0
~~;,'.
~
:.
i
b
I
:~
":
F-~;
;~
<
.:.
'~~~
I
I.:.
r."
l"
f~
V
13. ••••
••e ~
~
.-:"
@
~,;).~
® SCsI152/02,167 & 279/03, 190,191,193,194,195,279/09 11 Judgment
A
~Y
of, as perceived by the witnesses as also the Police
o
(?'?l Officers and as per the complaint, comprised of 5000
o
to 10000 persons who broke open gates of Gulbargo
@;;.:r, Society, demolished the rear wall of Gulbarg~~y
t®~ Society, entered into the Society and caused mayhem
e resulting in a carnage which resulted in turn in the
i?J.~.
death of a large number of innocent persons
~
e
~
including men, women and children and in such
fashion, no less than 69 persons belonging to the ~=!
minority community were done away in a most gruesome
fashion, properties in Gulbarg Society were set on
fire and a number of victims appeared to have been l<
C burnt alive by the mob. It is the case of the
~
U
A Prosecution that the Police force finally responded
'-~~j
~~"" by about 04: 30 p.m. in reaching the site of theU
f:~~
incident i. e. at Gulbarg Society and were finally't:~)
c) I.'b successful in dispersing the mob. It is the case of
j"
~:.;.:)
p;".
the Prosecution that the Police at that stage were
()
equipped with even enough vehicles whereby the
('
survivors of the massacre could be shifted to safetyc:"~.:r
;(:0 and thus the survivors were transported in Police
e
I:~~vehicles firstly to the Shahibaug Police Station ando[C)
v were thereafter taken away to safety and provided
o shelters in a refugee shelter immediately set up and
•
••
•
•
••
o
•
•
•
~
which was known as "Dariakhan Ghummat Shelter". It
is the case of the Prosecution that even when such
!f"'.•..,~....-~,.:.:.~~~~~~~
survivors were being escorted to saf~.~Y~.~·b~:¥:(~1~:tI:~~
Police, the mob regrouped and attemPt7tfl·:t;·9:~·:'.?f·~~;;e:fl'~·(~~~~
the Police from escorting such surviv#.r.~/.t-6:$~itti::,«?·
It is the case of the Prosecution t~~(i' the '~:~~,ice riJji1) . ,:....,~.,. . '. ".l.".,, -I ·1~.¥ ~ '__ I;'
had to yet again resort to firing tea~~.~.~~~,~~~~~::;;';:t>~/~l
:~..,-/.,:~~.~,:.~.;.<:: ~'Y.J(l
+';'.' /,.', r"" ...., 1 ~) ,"Q'~"-l;.~,. : I/!
,'j
; h~. i .. ::-~........ ,,#:-;1'"
•..., ,_ ~
........ - - ..h_·· .--'.'
..... _~o,;rJfIf'
14. •••e
~,'>
v
~
~
I!I>.~.g
e
~
~
o
e
o
••
••
o
••
G
6
A
V
iF"V
()
e'
U
-.,
'.(-'.::!
'.
()
C",''.:.)
€D
e:~"r:.
~
@
o
£1v
e
@
•
•
•
G
•
•
•
•
•
•
SCs/152/02,167 & 279/03, 190,191,193,194,195,279/09
also live bullets upon
injuries being caused
12
the
and
number of persons of the mob
difficulty, the Police could
safety. It is the case of
mob which
death being
Judgment
resulted in
caused to
and finally with great
escort the survivors to
the Prosecution that
admittedly, a large number of residents of Gulbarg
Society were done to death and their bodies were
finally identified by their surviving near and dear
ones and a large number of persons inc'luding Shri
Ehsan Jafri, were and are till date missing and not
traceable and are, therefore, required to be
presumed dead in light of the statutory provisions
since
years.
such
they have been missing for more than seven
It is the case of the Prosecution that in
circumstances, P. I. Shri K. G. Erda who was in
charge of the Meghaninagar Police Station at that
point of time and thus was primarily responsible in
providing security and protection to members of the
minority community within
incidentally was found to be
of his duties, and was prima
negligent, which resulted in
the locality and who
negligent in discharge
facie found criminally
his being arraigned as
an accused herein, and thus incidentally is accused
No.57 herein, however, at that stage, lodged his
complaint with regard to the incident and an offence
came to be registered at I-C.R.No.67/2002 with the
Meghaninagar Police
Prosecution that the
offence was handed
Station. It is the 9~:~~S~~~~~he
investigation inv:6:<th;~~::P:~:~~~,r' ",., ~li'..j --,
over to said p:{/~~~B-~i:::~:~:.,q:EiC.c()~
/ . ' ~ .' I ."..:.. ~~.~"" "~- •
initially who carried out such
28/02/2002 to 08/03/2002, "'.__ ~~ .' _.,._,
<~;~~t~~irf/)'
I1:-'
I
I',
i':j:::
j;:
I""
t:
~:
-:::;..:
17. ....m.~
'.
~~
~~:'
~~
~~
:$i
~'
E~:
~.:
/
SCs/152/02,167 & 279/03, 190,191,193,194.195,279/09 15 Judgment
i::
.,. resulted in a large number of arrests of accused
Y ~ taking place nearly six years after the incident l::
I>
i.e. in the year 2008-2009 and it is the case of the l~~
Prosecution that subsequently the Hon' ble Supreme
::
Court ordered the vacation of the stay on
proceedings and ordered the setting up of specially
designated Courts to take the present proceedings to
'.~
their logical conclusion. It is the case of the
Prosecution that initially Additional Sessions
Judge, Court No.13, City Civil & Sessions Court,
Ahmedabad i.e. Shri B.O.Joshi was appointed as the
specially designated Court to try the present
offence relating to Gulbarg Society massacre (it is
::::~~
made clear that the present incident would herein
after be referred to as either 'the Gulbarg Society
case' or 'the present incident' as and where the
context requires). It is the case of the Prosecution
that the designated Court proceeded to frame charges
.~
against 64 of the accused on 11/08/2009. The same
:~
designated Court in furtherance of orders passed
~,*. under Sec.319 of the Cr.P.C., whereby accused Nos.65
~~ and 66 were arraigned, proceeded to frame charge
~ against accused No.65 on 25/01/2010 and against
accused No. 66 on 10/02/2010. It is required to be
:.:*~
noted that the said designated Court Shri B.O.Joshi
ffi
thereafter proceeded to record the evidence of a
~~,~
':~~, large number of witnesses in the trial, but however,
was not in a position to complete the ... ~ . ''''''..
tr'i<:ff7?~i11":~<r"/"'" ", ! t! i~"
the said Presiding Officer was transM~L~,e,d"'::·'a:0i±b,~-;·"·.
the pendency of the proceedings.
position that Additional Sessions
/'/ .~., - .. 1·~· _ ......1.::"" .., .", ~ ..
'I' .... ; " ~. 1. ", l, .," ..... """'l I,. f
It jf.'s( ~;a!n.,.::>admi't,t6"d~() II;J ,: j r>,:'" >', ,,:::.(,~(..:., :~~~" 'j '-~. ~i
JU1t~~~:~ ~.ity'~~::C~.Vil r~)1
"
:.,.~'~F~~)i~~J >
''"''-':::'''---'---~.''-----~.,.~_:~
~___...,....""''''... ==~~.!!'tk~.:;:.~~;.:·;;;.r;;_-~==.>.I~l!:==>.I.
19. ••
••••••••••
••
I
.,
••
@
e SCs/152/02,167 & 279/03, 190,191,193,194,195,279/09 17
~
undersigned, and the Hon'ble
e
G
•e
directed the present proceedings
disposed of within the time frame
e• 8 . It is in the background of such facts
and circumstances that the following points have
arisen for determination by this Court:
•• I~
1) Does the Prosecution· prove beyond
~
o reasonable doubt that the accused, anyone or
o more of them or all of them, had entered into a
Q
~
pre-planned conspiracy to form an unlawful
r·,
6 assembly and thereafter perpetrate the carnage
e
at Gulbarg Society on 28/02/2002 which resulted(3
in the deaths of 69 persons and resulted ino
Ci1 attempts to murder, cause grave and serious l:;
~'W' injuries to other residents of Gulbarg Society
o and also cause damage and destruction of
~~,
w
vehicles and
()
thereby, the
e
them, haveG
e under Sec.120B, 143, 147, 148, 149, 153 (a) (1) (,
(;} 153 (a) (b), 153 (a) (1) (b), 186, 188, 295, 302,
e 307, 323, 324, 332, 337, 395, 396, 397, 398, 427,
435, 436, 447, 449, 452 of the Indian Penal
Code?
_..~;.:~~··~~:·;~:·:·:;,::;::~:~·::s~·~~
2) Does the Prosecution pr9'1~ .~§jY9.ri~~>~,.
t</ ~'::",,,,>'•.,""', .....~.:. ~ (~i ""',,'
reasonable doubt that in furthel:l;;:~c.,~·/":.:,tb~,'·tg,e~,,~,0~
property at Gulbarg Society and
accused or anyone or more of
committed an offence punishable K~
r
carnage and killing of persons,
anyone or more of them, had
Judgment
Supreme Court has I"
!.
to be concluded and
,
to:.
.
stipulated. ~~~
tn'~)/";~~~us~.~·Hb~~;')l~"2yt" . ' , ) ,~,~~ 'fl
b~rA"i:l 'th:":B.<:"ad~.;:..i:!j}
~~,>;;::~··i:~~:-;/.;.J
;" .. , t~.· Ii' ." r '--" y..~
~::::;.;~~~<~~,r
20. -
•••••••
~~~
•e ~~.:.,1
:.:;
~ :::
®
f.'),
~-:..,;1 SCs/152/02,167 & 279/03, 190,191,193,194,195,27,9/09 18 Judgment
o f~~
CJ
~'-~bodies of the victims in such a fashion so as
to destroy any evidence that could be used
®
~ against them. and had thereby committed an
i..
~)'
R:~ offence punishable under Sec.120B read togethert:.-~~5
"
"0';(.
"" with Sec.201 of the Indian Penal Code?
10'.,
~':~
r ..~.."
3) Does the Prosecution prove beyondIf~
'-:7
reasonable doubt that the accused Nos.2, 46 and
€t ~~,
()
fill)
@ ::~:;::ai~~~~~~~:~~~~ffn:~:;::;:~a::ap::::::~
~
,',I-'
,(':
~.) r~'~
e
"C:;
r~.
'-.)'
(C':"
.. .~
() ,.,.
i,'
(} f..~
::E:~~~ii3J4~J~~:i~;,6i:~~:)~~0~i~it::n:::~()
o
('.)
~
e
::asonabi;':'~:6;~n~elif~~!~~:e~::cu:er:v:o .:~YO:~~ f.,:
~~
t·e being a part 0 the conspiracy and in
()
furtherance thereof, was criminally negligent
~
~
in preventing the co-accused from perpetrating
eJ
the offence and had further conducted the
•G investigation in such manner as would result in
destruction of material evidence a9~~~~~'.
/:< .J / .../'~"....~'" (f';), '-<'".
, h b l .. ·· '. ',~~ d '-.,~. ,.~
thereby committed offence pun 1 s a ie; .. u !'t,eL;f :" ,. (Y'-{;.
i·' ,·.......'·r,J_ (·s··.., ''-' '. '.I . I ""';."J"'-'-"., ,,'
Secs.201, 217, 218 of the. Indian pena1/f;~tl~·?··;>.1;'·":'~~·C::~;
.n" ) ,., . ( -0 i~:' 0 '" ... . " ,'" "A, (" .J': Z.:·.f! ";;. '.•~. ,.,;"".., .:. } "~f!j
5) Does the Prosecution PrOVF! ' '1 beyorrd;';~"! ! ":'A'', "r 'C. ~ .', [ ' /1~. I, ~.Jir,f ~ • _~', -,", ) ,I~ 'i
<.:.>://~:;.-",.~::.:::~,::':.:'~~~~()~/.
... ;, .,> !! ·r ~." r' 12..".-' I /J
•
"'0.>'_ (J, .~,. ) , ..... v -;,
~'~:~·~';.~~k~~·
•
21. ;,;~
~
~
;:; j~]
(
'~ :.<.
~ SCs/152/02,167 & 279/03, 190,191,193,194,195,279/09 19 Judgment
f:'
'~
reasonable doubt that the accused or anyone or ~':.
~ ,."
'$:
<~
more of them, on account of they being armed li~
i:·.:
with lethal ,weapons, had committed offence
I;~
~ punishable under Sec.135 (1) of the Bombay
?i~'
Police Act?
6) Does the Prosecution prove beyond
reasonable doubt that the accused or anyone or...:.;.:.:-.;.:.:.:..;...,-:.;...;.... ~~
fE
more of tbett(';~ ::cfll?o.f .. theI11 had committed any ~~.):::-:. "-::":"
ft:
,.'
I::'"
":::""
'~
7) udgrlt;ent?
','
:.
points for9.
'~ determination as,Jo~iQws .,.
-:;:~ >. :'?::::)::-";;::; .<::: .t" .::;
'~
["_:
%I' ::';
)) }~f,;,;;,~;~?e .~ff~.ilhEi~L.
;".
~~~
',.:'
2) Partly in tl),e affirm§.tive.
f~
):~
~:/~r~ir~j~t!;:~~Y~~t i ve .
',..0; ~'.
:';:',
5)partTyiht:h~ affirmative.
~;
.i5.
6) In the negative.
"~;;
7) As per final order and judgment.
" ~.~)
10. Before ascribing my reasons for arriving
at the findings stated above on the pointsr~~~~~~'~
. . .#,.::.:,.--~<" C.. /-; '::':~"''''
determination framed, it 1S requ1red to b.~;~nQ,t:gd,:oA<.:,·:·::,..;'~~
,fl' . ,,' t .........,.. ...,>..J ."-'
that this has been a trial of almost unpre'ceden.t'e'd ):":- ...~ ~~~'~''! ' " '. -.,- ," , '" !..)'
proport ions, the oral evidence as [:~'~.l'i·:~l' ~~; ,,~' ~>~" (=1
~, • I
documentary evidence required to be cons~,d$r,~dl: f6~f:_-':~~"; !, ;~ :::~ij
<;·:>~220.:;j];/
22. '
*;.
",'
:~ SCs/152/02,167 & 279/03, 190,191,193,194,195,279/09 20 Judgment
-h'
deciding the fate of the present accused is also on
*' an unprecedented scale and since the trial of the,~
>'~~ present proceedings
*2 Presiding Officer,
the trial could be
.~
position of being
,'.
exceptional efforts
learned Advocates
was not conducted by the present
it is required to be noted that
concluded and judgment was in a
dictated only on account of the
of the learned Special P.P., the
for the defence as also the
cooperation of/ t::'il~' ¥ea:rhe¢> Advocate appearing on
~~;
,~:-~
:::::::::.....~~f:~;~~~~~~~~~t~c;~~~~i:~::::~ ::
.~~,
~
:~p~Ui::sd·~~::;~~~:~i~&~~; :iil;~t~~;:: h:P::~:~
~.
>~
~::::::l::tc~~:1::~!il:::e Jt~~:1;s1~re·p~:ri:::
,.
~
fi·
tl
:::::::~:f:~:~~tJ~!:~~;~~~~~;~;:~~~:~: :oon:::
~
Il
~;
t'
t~-~~
~: before the present court. It is also required to be
.~.,
noted that in light of the voluminous evidence
>,%"
required to be appreciated and referred to, the
present Court with agreement of all the parties
concerned, has directly dictated in the coqr.-t~·::?i~'~:7~~::;",,>
/<> ':. ~) ~..). ~~~: ',;;:; ,(:" ~"'1~
submissions made and arguments '"canvassed ~~:"',:;~:~:~:~«(9.I.·:,·:,:',~~~~~?~~~.
the parties, the parties have also/·./,:Rt9.~Tiq~o.:.;:.·<.....;":.;...~If ..--" ,f" ~'._-_., ; .., '/". 'rd;.J t,
compilations, tabulations and materiaJ!>:~s.. a~rkd~'>' .'J~) ':':: iJI.
~:. '.~~) .;':~ (..-:':: ~-' :.~ ~Ll, ~ •••,t.;:
judicial precedents considered relevay{~ >.c'-by ;;:fii~:~ + / ::<N
~;:~i;j:~:~;'{~;;;;';/....;<:~_~:> tj .'-', '-:::;.)'
......._.,..~~~
23. ••
••••
•••
.,
f)
~"".'tj! SCs/152/02,167 & 279/03, 190,191,193,194,195,279/09 21 Judgment
:.
consideration of the Court and therefore, it ist9
(:) required to be noted that there are no formal
{} handwritten notes of submissions but only dictated
o portions of the submissions which are accepted by
()
all the parties to have been dictated in the open£.:')
t::~;i ["
Court and in the pres~!?:g~ of all parties concerned.
f:'
•
o
11. W9~:~d~:~:~~:~$:§~j:ya.t juncture
~~
thi s
@,
<.c:
.,. respective..),
@.
proceedings,
o
to stat~ t h&t ·:··.·:·::·.i:.ri··:··:•••::.::;g:;:•••••~.~.~.8;5.t ·.···:·....t·d·.::•••••:.:~•.FO~·~:..
agains tfiea,CcW~~d;:::t:h~·pF8$·:~¢ut:i,ohpp-~
tel
o
G
~
;)'
~
~
~ than
~
()
@
G
o
@
c
e
G
~
•G
e•
••
parties contesting the present
all of which has been placed for the
the charges
~.:
re1 i e d upon
33 8with~~~e~::'~.:~i:f0.r:::;:7:8~:::·f~i16w:Ln:~details :
~~.1Statqf'1 IPanch l
Exh.
No.
2591
~:il~;9::.~itn~::::
An~p·rti~:h,!~a~9~£h::shkhwarii
2 IPolice 263
-
Nathtisinh:Naharsfnh Chauhan
3 IPolice 266
-
Babuji Chhaguji Dabhi
4 IPolice 269
-
Rajendrasinh Kallusinh Rajput
5 IPolice 270
-
Indrasinh Himmatsinh Gohil
6 IPolice 271
-
Lalitkumar Ramanbhai Patni
7 IPolice 273Arvindsinh Shankersinh Vaghela
...8 Doctor
9 Panch
10 Panch
11 IPolice
Harshadkumar Kantilal Rathod ,,:~:;r.:z-1if::~~·~(.-' ." :. f ";. .-, ..,. . '
Jagdish Vanaj i Mali /:?::.>
' )• • • /.~'~'•• ~ ,.' ~I~ :: ~ ~•• ''',.:~ ~,,,,,'
Popatbhal Shantlbhal Thakorr:,.. / :~.;~!2,g~t,:,:
. , - .';".. ' ....
Rameshbhai Nagj ibhai Pandoti ,: J 31'it/:·
I
I.'
c:
F:
"':"'1,
''l~l:/f~:!_::'': ~~'
~~.'j .......;..:.;~>.
"')'-{'''Cj''..,., ' ,
~ C. ~ n,
..... ." .: __.. ,..<.;; , Hi~: ,. 6 ;,' .r n. .f, ~. 1
'lll~ "..... ' .,~. ./ '._.:...1 ; /
: . 'c, .,', - , . . / . ' , 1/
'<i~~iiJ;J'
i
24. ••
••••
•••
~
~:~
~~~
~j
CD ~
{j
() SCs/152/02,167 & 279/03, 190,191,193,194,195,279/09 22 Judgment i:
@
o
(0
e
P:"'-.- ~
r~·-l->
C"",
'-:)
0:.;j
,•
@
o
o
C
A
~
e
(}
G
FA
~
e
G
e
o
A.
~
~
e
G
e
.,
G
•
•
•
PW
NO.
IStatus Name of Witness Exh.
No.
12 IPolice Sajjansinh Jorubha Jhala 315
13 IPolice Dhanesinh Becharsinh Kumpawat 316
14 Panch IDipakbhai Somnath Panchal 1318
15 Panch IMohanji Piraji Vanzara 1319
16 Panch IIshwerlal Devilal Solanki 1327
17 Panch IVelaji Mafaji Thakor 1329
18 Panch IRamanbh§i ::i3Eikhabh,ai Prajapati 1330.....:::::::• .-.:.:::;::>.'.
19 panchls:6p~~U1:j'J; Vgg~~Kj*T,pakor 1332
20 Pol i ce .:.' ITDctik$.inh .M?hsinh.'Sqlank i 1334
21 Polj:te .IM9tieqg.I·:.::P::~hY~I§B~V9:gheTa 1335
22 PoliCe JShci.$lerlgpa:~ih1+.I'f~f~H§itlp·.·.Jadej a 1336
23 panch/ IT%:~io:c:hery.~:~p:B·(paYpl~~nh S.aluj:? 1340
24 parlch 1r1~he~hkumg'~'" :'E
Mgk,wa.na::: .
ameshcha~draI341
25 Panch IDh~rnleSl}~.tim~r.:Bhikh)aphai Bharwad 1343
26 Pandb 'lR~mi~l:a1 ::t~'dhi~bhai'! 9Smera. ..•.•.. / 1345
27
28 Y
Panch
Polic;e ip ~a.d~ps·inh Sh~t~·I1§ih.J:1Rathc5d 1349
rSerldhabhai Lalabhai Dhola:wala 1347.. .".:..: _ :. ,,~-'" . ..:.:.;..: :.:.'..-:.--: ::.. .
29 Police Db.c3.nsP1.3~¥Bha.~k:;+ l£%dBhsl:gwa t 1351
30 Police bh9ifn~bh:~J-:·.RajhtJibh~.iBOdat 1352
31 Panch Mahe~hbhaiRatnabhai Patel 1354
32 Panch Premaram Umedji Vanjara 1356
33 Panch 358Indrapalsinh Nawabsinh Rathod
34 Doctor 359Upendrabhai M. Jadhav
35 Doctor 363Jayendra R. Modi
36 Panch 380Prabhatbhai Sankabhai Desai
37
38
39
40
Police
Police
Police
Police
Kavaji Rupaji Asari
Dolatsinh Padamsinh Rathod
Chandubhai Vashrambhai Rami
Pasabhai Galabhai Solanki
t·"I:.:
I.,
I
ke
t":
E:
l:.~
~
.?
;.~:
:.~~~
:':
!::~
I.~.
1-,
~: . r' ~
!,~- ~ ).: <-... ~~-.;>-
25. •• Io
o
@ SCs /152/02, 167 & 279./03,
~
'-f'i"
'tj1
~~
@
fj
o
o
At,.;J
•••
e
•
••
•
e
e
@
A.,
*'
A
V
G
€p
V
A
Y
o
@
A
~
IF2c.
V
e
e
•
•
••
G
•••
•
•
~
l~
:~
~:
:~
(~~
PW
NO.
IStatus IName of Witness Exh.
No.
41 IPolice IRameshbhai Somabhai Solanki 391
42 IPanch IKamleshbhai Ambalal Thakker 393
43 IPanch IKantibhai Shankerbhai Patni 395
44 IPanch IRamprakash Gulabsinh Bhadoria 397
45 IPolice IRajeshbhai Kuberbhai Parmar 399
46 IPolice IMavjibhai Hakshibhai Bodar 400
47 IPo1 i ce IRanghh6dbhai<Ratnji,phai Malavia........ .<..-:.;..•. ,;",:->.«.; .
401
48 IPoli ce .ld~.9*~~'*n~',lMm+s±~h/Bbi3.ti 402
49 IDoctor tpc,,tt1t.bhai <'R,.Shah<' 403
50 IDoctor; .1 BP·a;il},i$.i~'·:$h'~hl:,...········ 408
51 IPanch>'1<:;it]l'§hbgi3:iJay.<3.rtt±.lCil '. Pate1 411
52 IP ?n~h l ~~~'r9t'~,~,,if@:r~~,ia1'.,.Tli$,k0 r. 413
53 IParich n~~9r~t s,$'~:~'~':~"~l p:ra3~pati·••••·. 414
54 IPanch IM~Aeddrasin.h'Babu.rg;mRathod. 416
55 IPol:Lc§ .••. la~~U~ha+:,~%t~·~phd,i,m,b.nam2t· 418
5 6 IDoctori iG§.;B'arl j a If'''t>::,::F'uka.n 419
57 IDoctOr IM~.t e s:p.B:~iE;q,:t e:.Ji:./:: 422
58 IDoctbr 7lRak.·~sh S . Bhavsar..,.,. . :..:.. 425
60
5 9
IPanch
IDoctor . ·
IGhan,§h~aitt Bh~Z;~riif.er· Tiwari
B$;t;~l '......IGdV&1A%9'f1~i<P
431
427
61 IPolice Kanjibh~i<Verjibhai Damor 433
62 IDoctor Jayeshkumar M.Joshi 434
63 IDoctor Kalpesh H.parikh 448
64 IDoctor Pravinbhai L. Desai 451
65 IPanch Santosh Ramachal Pathak 454
66 IPanch Hitendrasinh Manubha Jadeja 455
67
68
69
70 Doctor
Panch
Panch
Doctor
,/j:::-~~I§:';.~~>:/. '--' 459, ...
i; ",': J .'.. ' '·C'.,
j , ' , , '
,r '.,.;... ., ~4 6 4';'->-' ..,. 'C'y
; .... ) ,.:",~~;,:
i: ,'. '. 49}.:,;;,
Sanjaybhai Kantibhai Patni
Ramtirath Sahdevsinh Patel
Madansinh D. Jhala
Jayesh B. Rupal
190,191,193,194,195,279/09 23 Judgment
I' ,
~:.
t'··
t~
:::;
~
(:
I~"
!~
i'~
1;-:
~<
~~:<:
'..J
'-. (1 L~
I,. ~
I I 0, , ..... /
',. V=1
"r' j I
::~~;l~~_i;:~~~)
i
45. ••e
&..~'~:.
@
o
~~
~
'i>;;J
~
~
o
o
••
•
••
o
e
9
C
e:.~/~'
127>
'l~}
{..",
. ~!
~y
{J
o
()
o
~
A
~'
e
~
C?
e
~
o
G
G
•
•
e
••
•
••
•
SCs/152/02,167 & 279/03, 190,191,193,194,195,279/09 44 Judgment
Exh.
No.
Sr. Particulars
No.
217 IInjury certificate of Indrasinh Mansinh 1669
2181Panchnama of detention of accused No.27 &1671
26
2191Panchnama of detention of accused No. 241673
220
221
221
-A
222
223
224
225
226
227
228
229
230
231
232
233
Shankerji Hakaji mali
Panchnama of detention
Mukesh Pukhraj Sankhla
Prahlad RajujJ,As'Ori<
of
and
accused
accused
No.2 91675
No.28
Panchnamg/ 6f9qmag:~ -... 1708
~~i~d~iet~~!~~~~:~~~~~~~l,eQ' SaliOOohai 712
N$ranrao '~;~!i1;~~'''''W'' - .. . 0" •
~:J:;Y} 6~;'tiifi~~,[..~1£ ' Vishal Badrijil715
Police Yac:i.cU?lOr1,e.tkith Ekh. 715 1716
Bap~~s wisl). Pf'r r:~:B:?:::B:>.::N 0 .644 1717
PM~§pdrtWP.;~44:::'::()'if/:::D::~hiyClbenMahemudbhai 1718
.. ..... ,.
complaint of.<;ia,mi;l.ge..,.. ..: 1723. ..-.' '....-:...:... :.::: ..•:...;::.;.::.: ,.":. ,'-',
Panchnamaof identification of 06 deadl746
b 0 di e:·s.. .:..:..: : : :.:.:.: :.::::::: :.:.:.:'. .
~:~~~~:~aD~::!~~w;~th i accus ed No.3 01775
Injury certificate of Firoz 1785
Injury certificate 1787
Injury certificate of Altaf 1789
Injury certificate of Jetunbibi 1791
2341Panchnama of accused No.32
Kantilal having produced weapons
235 Injury certificate of Bablu
236 Police yaadi
237 PM report No.450 of Aslam
2381PM report No.452 of Shahjadali Faqir Mohammad
Ambesh 794
,:~~:;~S'~:~~~~?~~~,
!/" '·"l9'E)'''-'·'- . - ""~
.d:; ->'~" .-.~, ~' .,,':; ~,:.(."C;.:
'--J} ' , ' ' ;(::..'··L
"J < 8 05: '. t, (-- ;
I , ~,. ( "'y"; j ~
( .. ''''0, ! " ...' ii
. ! 80:6' + ~ ".,ili'- ,) , JI
~~:""~;:~?;~~'~/
[0°
!>
r:;
t-~
,"::
~
!
f;
f;
p.)
[2
f-:
46. ••e
@
o SCs/152/02,167 & 279/03, 190,191,193,194,195,279/09 45 Judgment
o
o
o
~
~:3'
r}
(:)
P":;.
~.)
()
0
,',.-.-..-,:";
,/;.,j.:,i:.
~
A
~:-7
r).
V
._'.j( '"':':"
c:o;,
~.?
()
'".,"'>1
"-" ~C
C'
(:~':
(:)
"":_~"'~C
(
~.
,~)
o
o
(:)
@
A
~
f",
o
~
A
~
B
~
@
@
•
•
•
••
•
•
G
..
Exh.
No.
ParticularsSr .'
No.
2391PM report No.478 of Gulzar Mohammad I807
Noormohammad Pathan
240lpM report No.479 of Mohammad Yusuf 1808
2411PM report No.476 of Faisal Rafiqbhai 1809
2421Map of scene of offence 1812
2431Injury certificate of Naranbhai 1819
Chhanabhai ......;.:-:.:.:::..:- .
820244 1Injury ceftifi~a4:~::qf' I}.G:Erqa. ":'"':';'.'
82124510PD ca$epaw$+>,., ,., .
~ OPD.<cas e~ap§x::
822
823I njl;r;Yc~rtk:h£e.~t::~{·.'·pf:Pt$,p.J-ad Othpr a k ash247
248
~h~~f:~shit~~~£:~~,~:0::::;:;:Of.accused . No. 71824
249 1()P6da.sep~per: 1825
250lInjy:sy certificat:e:·o!'N.J.Bhati 1826
2511 ;~'MjiQoiltMj::~~1a~~~~;61~~~Y St::~~:1841
252 1StatE::!rn~n1:show.~n:9.,.::.q~t.g.:i.+p of bandobast on 184 6
28/'0 2/2..Q.o 2' ......:..::'".::: .:::..:; '.'.::·:··.x;: ":..':: '" '.
253IPhotOcppy./ gf:th.e, .. original attendancel847
~:~~~n~~a~=~~Z0:rt=':~("f:=Ebliceofficial of
2541Photocopy of th~br'igihaTattendance sheet ofl848
28/02/2002 of Police official of Meghaninagar
2551photocopy of original register of charge 1850
of Motisinh Abhesinh Bariya - dtd.
28/02/2002
2561photocopy of original register of
of Motisinh Abhesinh Bariya
28/02/2002
2571photocopy of original register of
of Motisinh Abhesinh Bariya
28/02/2002
2581Notification published by
Commis s ioner, dated 28/02/2002
~~
I:sp;:
E~
~I~::
I.:
,..
:.:.
::
~,~,
','
!
,.
~
l~
~
47. ••
•••
c
•
e
SCs/152/02,167 & 279/03, 190,191,193,194,195,279/09 46 Judgment
~~~
@
~
v
e
o
@
@
~.'"t::;..'
@
'@
~
e
o
g,
~~}
£"
~:;:
o
C)
('.
,<j
()
(')
f"
I;i;,;,f
G
(.")Cl
v
()
~
e
c
v
~
@
G
e
B.'
v
•
•
•
•
e
Sr.
No.
259
Panchnama
Panchnama
Panchnama
Panchnama
260
261
262
263
Exh.
No.
Particulars
870Complaint regarding damage to vehicles
878of damage
879of damage
880of damage
881of damage
882
2651Panchnama of damage 1884
264 Panchnama of damage
.':':':::':' .
2 66Ipanchnamao{fi~m~'g:~ 1886
267 Panc hriamp ... dfd.~ma(j'§::
==---....-;.,......".,..;....,.....-,..;....,.----+--~
2 68 panChpamCl. of
1890
270 Ip~ncH~ama>6f¢l~r;rri!Mt:~ :.:i( 1891." '". .~.:.....:.:. .... .. .. .
271 PeEm.iss i oD.. .::.f 0 i.:::·'.i·::::·:···~~:pb s e cut i on a g a inst I8 98
accused NC). 56 to ''63' ...' ; ::.:.
272 permissiop>f:r-om{,th~i'Stat~Governmentforl900
prosee1.Jt i~Q a,ga ~:'P..§:~¥::·'.!.·~.Scu s~d};ro . 24t0 37
273 P~rrh:tssioriiftom the'State Government forl901
prbs~cbtion agp;i:.r.:rS;t( aqclsed No ..1 to 20
274 Permission tor pro~ecution against 903
accused NO. {l)" .." ..:,•.:......... .
904
accused No.38 and 39
276 IPermission for prosecution against 905
accused No.22 and 23
2771Permission for prosecution against 1907
accused No.42 to 55
2781Permission for prosecution against 1908
accused No.40
275 Pe rmi s s i on.ftir·.:: •••:p:tb~~cu t i on against
••-",'~_"lIt1':
~.,'-"-;:"~~"';' ," '.
~panchnama of scene of offence / •. 82,8 ',. ,
7! .::. " ~:.>" ~.~
:Q·39. I·~.280lPhotocopy of Fire Call No.113 ..,/ v
/'":(' ~."''''~' ,I' (,' :::, '..:.~, ".". s~~'""' ~ ~. (;......;'
f' ,... ,; . '", '. . - ,,) :~l - <Q- .i;.....
281lDetails on page No.147 of I"
[0
Occurri~'.~'cf~ ,-941 t 1~~, .y~:. J~
Register
I
~:, i~~:~ ';. ~'~~6!'
I
<
.', ) ;I'" ......'I'Ie.". '... '. ,~".. : I
'} p i "- , (1, I
'1'11' "~'" ., ~ _t! ,.' 1 ci~~; cI~tf Ij'
, i }.:~,:;'."~ .'. ,< 1.,' '/'~'i" 0 ./",,_. '/ ' ."',,/...... ,.... LI
~,' , . "." 'OJ I~
;:.....:...~/l" ;') ~J~' ~~
~;,:..'. '.~" ' ~ ~
~.:(o~~~~_,~ _~J
l=':
f~f~
f>I,:.
I::
':.
i"
[,
r
•.'S'~~.
:.':.::.'.,...~~~....
" ". -'''',
:.~;;:';'<:,::~:,
=.. ',
48. •••••••••••••
I
•e
e
@
~ SCsfl52/02,167 & 279/03, 190,191,193,194,195,279/09 47
@
Sr. ParticularsA
W'
No.
e 2821Evening Entry dated 28/02/2002 in
e original vehicle Register
o 2831Medical certificate of Kheda Hospital
2841Panchnama of damage
•
•••
•
e
2851Panchnama of damage
2861Permission of State Government
prosecution against accused No.53.....'..:.:...:-:.... ,;,.,:"",:,:-;.
287IPanchnamapeg~;diJ1'g(phY$:ic:::al . condition
accusedNc;>.;l4.J~~hHlh·:~Gabbar and
•
let another Ninpa.A-fvindbh§,{
• 288 1:~~~~~:m~o.1~~~~I'~~':~~h9i condition
o 289
~
~
~
C",'t;:>i 290
G
~
~
i.:.'Gi
Room,
2991MeSSage
No.235,
..
Judgment: j.-
Exh.
I::'
No.
t;
l::thel942
i:
[~
l~~
I":
1945
1947
1948
forl953
':~:
;;.'
tofl955
one
.~~:
I~~
ofl956 f{
panGhpamat~gp;.rcripg·.r~covery of swordl957
;~~:~1:1c~~ieJarl!rZ"% Jayesh @ Gabbar
Panchnama ort5hYs:i:cal. condition ofl958
accused No.6,·. Kisb.Qt/Mangabhai Patni, and
~:~~~~~.~A~pal;c~::t:·.:::~l~;r~:;~s~h~::~~~:~
Patniand·k:Lranbhai Hirabhai Nadiya........:.....
e 291IPanch~arnao:f·"d~{~:I1tionof accused No.101959
@ Shakrabhai Sehdhabhai Patni··. . '.:.:.:.;..•.:.; ' .
e
•e
292 IPanchnama. ·.·bf/·/:-:::a¢¢V$ed. •....:::.. No .11 Mano j 1960
Premj ibhaiPartnak .•. hard..rigbeert detained
e
r~:
9662931Copy of order fo:rCUFre~ I:'
2941Message of Ahmedabad City Police Controll967
Room, page No.215, entry No.659
2951Message of Ahmedabad City Police Controll968
Room, page No.219, entry No.307
2961Report made to S.C.P. 970
2971Message of
Room, page
2981Message of
page
Ahmedabad City Police
No.227, entry No.479
Ahmedabad City Police
No.233, entry No.446
Cont ro,k: ~~'~'~;::):'.;~;~~
. jI~/~ ~ ~..~ ~.... ~ IJ l'-'~ ::~~
i /:?::>~:::','~>~~'-,,::.~~::;~
Cortt r,o,1:~74·;..e.< f .~(~.~.
t· '::.)" ':!;:;~~~i ~:.. ")- ,'" f ·l~
of Ahmedabad City Police Control Roont "pagEl"- 97~'. . l ;)11
entry N o . 4 4 0 - · " , · ~ 1::"';,1/
" /sl'h_,~:. 't~ ~}
!
" ' / > . , - ...
,. . .c.. , ' •• :-~-:, ~"J; r
·-·':"'T';,..~·~L~f:1;;;7
t
49. •••••••
I
[-;;.:
.;:
•
•• ~~r.~
~~;
G
@ SCs/152/02,167 & 279/03, 190,191,193,194,195,279/09 48 Judgment
k
@
Exh.
No.
ParticularsSr.
No.
300lMessage of Ahmedabad City Police Controll976
Room, page No.243, entry No.447
3011Complaint made by Aslam in Gujarati at 1982
Meghaninagar Police Station
3021Complaint made by Aslam in Hindi atl983
Meghaninagar Police Station
3031Panchnama of damage 1989
304.IPanchnama o:f dama:~.~ ...· 1990
305Ipanchnama9~~~rnaq;$ 1993
306 ComPtairtt, ()f'~~he'iYM.~:khan, 1060
307 ~~7~~i~;;~ e~~"g,~~Im@ges No.1 and 115 1063
308
d:~a;pn1J'~~c!k~~IiAton~!riasd~ate for
309
~~~~~~ti~~,~J :~1~!l( for .. oonducting
310 Pahchnama /)gf .ide.p·t:;i::f~sa.tibn ,.parade
311 Panch ,slip) of ~Gdakfu~lkrticle'No.1 of
sessif,qps Gase.No..~.+'97/2Q03....: ..:: .: .. ~: . ;.: .;.:•..•-: .:.;:-: ". _'i~:' .... ,'. . .
312 IPanchnama of ,sword having been traced out
by accused. N;o~.21.....sandip'@ "SOH'll
313ICertifiedp1164Mt¢·py:.···:P:£:::rit~ssagedated 27 &11076
28/2/2002 ofWi.r~le:§·~: Message Register
1082
..... - - ..
314 IPanchnama of dead body
3151Panchnama of recovery of burst cartridgesl1083
from the scene of offence
316 IPanchnama of recovery of knife froml1084
accused No.1
317 Panchnama of recovery of burst cartridges 1085
rill:' . ': ..",,:~
318 Panchnama of recovery of cylindrical,~~'~r~,;}(~~ij:~<~
con-:ainer (kerbo) from accused
Vakll ",1,- ... ' .,,, .. C
~ / l.- '.': .- ,"r' L
319 Affidavit of Sayeedkhan Ahmedkhan
, ~.. :
320 Letter of Hutch Company
r-:'
e !:.~
e i·,:
r"
c.;
..••
"
•e
e
e '.
e
~
~
::-
IfJ;,.
~
a~
@
~.
1:.:)
{'"
,',""
";J
o~
("<.;,
c~"
~.~;?
c-:·.:)
()
o
o
@
Q ~2
&
r~
~
~
o
e
G
e ~,~~..,.,:~
• Surend~~~~::;'>.:.;.:..·~:···~~:~'~~::.~)l.:$~
'. •- '~i
~...,:_'~ ~,; ...::"J -' 1 'l. ~.",.. "!:l
patharijJ:1'd94'i~ft:;?V~(~,~,}/..,~ ..
.:: :Oi, ! ~::, i~ i.
'j). Ht38 ;~"~",). )_.l.'J; l,
"., "<:' ~'" , ",-:.~;':".! ·I.··~f/l
,~ • .I~ ,./ ....~ .J/
-:(S~~j1~[;grl