SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 44
We have our visit in April
     Pre QAR week of Sept. 24
•   Capturing our efforts and conversations- KEY
•   Working as the P.L.TEAM- ESSENTIAL
•   Being in the “know” about CSI- CRUCIAL
•   Committing to the goals- NECESSARY
•   Imbedding effective intervention-CRITICAL
•   Using the interventions systematically and
    consistently -VITAL
Making Interventions Powerful
        CSI Data Review
               Quality Indicator Map
       Formative Assessment
   Standards and Backwards design
        Differentiated Instruction
4 Stages of a Professional learning Community
Differentiating Instruction in Content
Differentiating Instruction in Process
Differentiating Instruction in Product
Integrating Interactive White Boards




Deeper understanding and effective use of
assessment tools and the data they yield
Bahrain School provides students
 with a safe environment in
 which they are challenged to
 their maximum potential as
 responsible members of a
 global society.
The Bahrain Middle/High School
 community Empower all students to
 reach their maximum potential as
 Engaged citizens in a global society.
 We are committed to Education using
 rigorous standards-based
 curriculum provided in a supportive
 environment.         3
                    E
Goal #1
   Smart Goal 1 : Reading Comprehension
   All students, by June 2014, will improve in reading comprehension
    through increased proficiency in vocabulary with emphasis on
    academic/abstract language as measured through system-wide and
    school based assessments.

   Instructional Intervention: Building Academic Vocabulary (6-Step
    Process)

   Smart Goal 2 : Problem Solving and Reasoning
   All students, by June 2014, will improve in problem solving and
    reasoning through improved proficiency in identifying problems,
    choosing strategies, applying strategies, and reflecting on results as
    measured by system-wide and school based assessments.

    Instructional Intervention: Four-Step Problem Solving (I-CAN)
    .
Algeria
                                                     Argentina
                                                     Australia
                                                     Bahrain
                                                     Canada
                                                     China
                                                     Columbia
                                                     Denmark
                                    58               Ecuador
                                                     Egypt
                                                     France
   236
                                 Bahrain   18
                                                     Germany
                                                     India
                                                     Indonesia
                                                     Iraq
United States                                        Itlay
                                                10
                                                     Jordan
                                                     Korea
                                                     Luxembourg
                                                     Malasia
                                                     Netherlands
                                                14   Nigeria
                                                     Oman
                                                13   Pakistan
                                                     Philippines
                                                     Russia
                                                     Saudi Arabia
                                                     South Africa
                                                     Spain
                                                     Sudan
                                                     Syria


         425 Students from
                                                     Turkey
                                                     United Kingdom
                                                     United States


         36 Different Countries
                                                     Venezuela
                                                     Zimbabwe

                September 2012
81                     US Military


                                   Federal Civilian
189
                                   Federal Cotractor

                      80
                                   US Government


                                   US Citizen
                 10
           12
      43
                                   Foreign National




                           September 2012
Military Dependents
            Army Active     Navy Active    Marine Active     AF Active




                           AF Active, 3 Army Active, 3


               Marine Active, 13




                                                Navy Active, 66




Total: 84
The average tour of duty is 2 years in
Bahrain. Normally we would assume
that 1/2 of our student population will
be in their first year at our school at any
given time. However, recent civil unrest
and a mandatory evacuation in 2004
has made predicting our population
movement a challenge. We do anticipate
an influx of military students as more
families are permitted to return.
The average tour of duty is 2 years in
Bahrain. Normally we would assume
that 1/2 of our student population will
be in their first year at our school at any
given time. However, recent civil unrest
and a mandatory evacuation in 2004
has made predicting our population
movement a challenge. We do anticipate
an influx of military students as more
families are permitted to return.
There had been a steady increase in our student population after the evacuation
of Americans in 2004. The closure of the school in the spring of 2011 caused
another precipitous drop in our student population, though it was not as severe
or as long lasting.
TerraNova Objectives (2010)

                           Percent of students attaining High Mastery of each Science Objective

                Grades             6th              7th             8th              9th               10th        11th

 Science Inquiry              59              61               59               49                51          55

 Physical Science             62              67               54               53                49          51

 Life Science                 65              72               59               51                46          55

 Earth & Space Living         50              69               62               53                46          51



 Science & Technology                         69               65               53                45



 Personal & Social Pers       62              69




Overall, students’ OPIs in Science were higher than students’ OPIs in Math and Reading, with the exception of the
OPIs obtained by students in 10th grades.
The relatively lower scores in Science Inquiry in grades 6, 7, and 9, support the necessity of Goal #2: Problem
Solving.
TerraNova Objectives (2010)

                          Percent of students attaining High Mastery of each Reading Objective

           Grades                  6th            7th             8th             9th             10th        11th

Basic Unders.                53              67              35              56              53          53

Analyze Text                 71              69              38              53              50          53

Evaluate/Extend Meaning      56              61              35              58              47          59



Rdg/Writing Strategies-      50              67              38              53              55          57
Vocabulary




        Vocabulary: Reading and Writing Strategies include Vocabulary Strategies. It
        should be noted that Vocabulary Strategies have the highest number of test
        items in Reading and Writing Strategies. In 2010, Reading/Writing Strategies
        had the lowest (or one of the lowest) percentages of students who achieved High
        Mastery in Grades 6, 8, and 9. Another area that showed a relatively low
        performance, although to a lesser degree, was Analyze Text
TerraNova Objectives (2010)
                           Percent of students attaining High Mastery of each Mathematics Objective

           Grades                   6th              7th             8th              9th              10th        11th
Number/number relationships   59               61               49               49               55
Computation & Estimation      53               58               43               56               53          51
Measurement                   56               56               43               51               56          57
Geometry                      59               67               51               49               53          53
Data, Stat, Prob              47               61               46               49               59          51
Patterns, Func, Algebra       44               56               49               56               64          51
Prob Solving & Reasoning      59               61               49               47               53          55
Communication                 53               67               49               60               69




 Problem Solving and Reasoning. In 2010, Problem Solving and Reasoning had
 the lowest or one of the lowest percentages of students who achieved High
 Mastery in Grades 8, 9, and 10.
TerraNova Objectives (2012)
                         Percent of students attaining High Mastery of each Science Objective
      Grades           6th               7th               8th                9th               10th        11th
Science Inquiry              67                 51                 67                56                47          50

Physical Science             71                 51                 67                53                45          45

Life Science                 71                 59                 69                62                38          51

Earth & Space Living         69                 56                 76                53                40          45

Science &                                       54                 69                56                44
Technology

Personal & Social            73                 56
Pers




     From 2010 to 2012, 6th, 8th, and 9th grades improved in all areas. 7th
     grade decreased significantly, 10th and 11th grades showed some
     decrease. The annual influx of students in grades 10 & 11 present
            challenges. We have implemented more assistance for
                                    students.
TerraNova Objectives (2010)
                           Percent of students attaining High Mastery of each Mathematics Objective
           Grades                    6th             7th             8th             9th              10th        11th
Number/number                   59              61              49              49               55
relationships

Computation & Estimation        53              58              43              56               53          51


Measurement                     56              56              43              51               56          57
Geometry                        59              67              51              49               53          53
Data, Stat, Prob                47              61              46              49               59          51
Patterns, Func, Algebra         44              56              49              56               64          51


Prob Solving & Reasoning        59              61              49              47               53          55


Communication                   53              67              49              60               69




Problem Solving and Reasoning. In 2010, Problem Solving and
Reasoning had the lowest or one of the lowest percentages of
students who achieved High Mastery in Grades 8, 9, and 10.
TerraNova Objectives (2012)
                          Percent of students attaining High Mastery of each Reading Objective

          Grades                      6th           7th           8th           9th              10th        11th
Basic Unders.                               67            59            64            60                46          36

Analyze Text                                71            54            71            64                42          38

Evaluate/Extend Meaning                     62            56            71            62                46          42



Rdg/Writing Strategies-                     73            56            73            58                45          42
Vocabulary




 We have seen improvement in Reading Comprehension in grades
 6, 8, & 9, but the large influx of students in grades 10 and 11
 present challenges and have led us to more powerful interventions.
 Grade 7 showed a slight decrease in Reading. We adopted more
 powerful intervention strategies: Marzano’s 6 Step process for
                            Academic Vocabulary
Mean Lexiles by Grade Level 2006-2011

     GRADE   2006                2007          2008          2009          2010          2011

             Mean                Mean          Mean          Mean          Mean          Mean
5                    925                 827           957           893           925           925

6                    915                 946           920          1074           992           997

7                   1191                1012          1087          1022          1085          1088

8                   1259                1143          1127          1166          1111          1209

9                    928                1157          1222          1196          1182          1173

10                     .                1105          1214          1265          1235          1224

11                     .                   .          1183          1309          1358          1283

12                     .                   .             .          1073          1295          1368
Scholastic Reading Inventory
                 September 2011 to February 2012 Results

Grade                                     6            7            8            9          10          11          12
Actual                           15.06%       14.66%        12%         16.31%       8.40%       9.20%        14%
Expected                          20%          16%          20%         12.50%        10%         10%         20%


Diff Actual/Expected             -4.94%       -1.34%       -8.00%       3.81%        -1.60%      -0.80%      -6.00%
Below Standard Fall 2011           8            8           14           14           19          16          15
Below Standard Feb 2012            9            6           10           10           16          16          12


Diff Students Below Standard       -1           2            4            4            3           0           3


                We adopted more powerful intervention strategies: Marzano’s 6
                Step process for Academic Vocabulary
TerraNova Objectives (2012)
                           Percent of students attaining High Mastery of each Mathematics Objective
          Grades                  6th              7th              8th              9th              10th        11th
Number/number                            49              44               66               62                54
relationships
Computation & Estimation                 60              49               66               62                52          35


Measurement                              53              44               66               67                56          44

Geometry                                 49              44               66               67                59          40

Data, Stat, Prob                         56              49               68               60                60          37
Patterns, Func, Algebra                  53              54               66               67                60          36

Prob Solving & Reasoning                 53              49               68               64                61          43


Communication                            53              49               68               64                61



 From 2010 to 2012: Grade 6 showed decreases in scores in Geometry and Number/Number
 Sense. 7th grade decreased in all areas, but 8th and 9th grades improved significantly.
 Grade 10 was consistent, but 11th grade decreased in all areas.
Bahrain School 2009 AP Assessment Summary
AP ASSESSMENT N Count Score of 5 Score of 4 Score of 3 Score of 2 Score of 1
Calculus             19           1          3        3          2        10
Chemistry            10           1          2        1          3          3
Economics-Micro      21           2          8        6          4          1
Physics              10           1          0        3          5          1
Spanish                1                     1
U.S. History           1                                         1
                               62 Students took AP EXAMS
                               6 AP courses were offered
                               52% of the students earned a 3 or better
                               8% earned a top score of 5
2012 AP Scores
                            N Count    5         4         3        2         1
English Language &
Comp                            11               2         5        3         1
Microeconomics                  23      6        9         6        2
US Government                    2      1                  1
US History                       5               3         1        1
Calculus AB                     21      7        2         5        1         6
Chemistry                        6      4        2
Physics B                       23      3        5         4        2         9
Physics C: Elect. & Magn.        3      2                           1
Physics C: Mechanics             2      1                  1
                            96 Students took AP EXAMS (Up from 62 in 2009)
                            9 AP courses were offered (Up from 6 in 2009)
                            73 % of the students earned a 3 or better (52% in 2009)
                            25% earned a top score of 5 (8% in 2009)
3.How often did I do school work during seminar?
                                      More than 1/2           Only
                   All the time          the time          Sometimes        Rarely or never
                                               Row N               Row
                Count Row N % Count              %       Count N % Count Row N %
Grade 6             7          23%      14        47%         6     20%        3        10%
      7             3        18%         8      47%         4     24%        2        12%
      8             9        21%        14      33%        17     40%        3         7%
      9             6        13%        21      46%        12     26%        7        15%
      10           16        20%        37      46%        19     24%        8        10%
      11            6        19%         9      28%        15     47%        2         6%
      12            2        20%         5      50%         1     10%        2        20%
      Total        49        19%      108       42%        74     29%       27        10%


              ENGAGED: As a result of teacher perceptions and student
              perception data we implemented Administration Seminar: a.k.a.
              ASKABAN
4.How often did I get help from my teachers during seminar?
                                     More than 1/2           Only
                 All the time            the time        Sometimes         Rarely or never
                                               Row N              Row
              Count Row N % Count                %      Count N % Count Row N %
Grade 6           4          13%          4      13%        11     37%      11         37%
      7            0         0%        2      12%          4    24%        11        65%
      8            2         5%       10      23%        16     37%        15        35%
      9            4         9%        9      20%        20     43%        13        28%
      10         11         14%       18      23%        28     35%        23        29%
      11           6        19%        5      16%          8    25%        13        41%
      12           2        20%        3      30%          3    30%         2        20%
      Total      29         11%       51      20%        90     35%        88        34%

                   SUPPORTIVE ENVIRONMENT: As a result of teacher
                   perceptions and student data, we implemented more structured
                   interaction between seminar teacher and assigned students. We
                   also kept teacher and seminar students together when possible
                   from last year to t this.
14.To What extent were you aware when or how you mastered the standards in your
                                                   classes?
                                                More than 1/2
                                 All the time     the time     Only Sometimes Rarely or never
                      Row N               Row            Row            Row N               Row N
              Count     %      Count N % Count N % Count                  %       Count       %
Grade 6          1       3%         9 30%          13 43%          5       17%         2        7%
      7           0       0%        6     35%        7   41%        4       24%        0      0%
      8           0       0%        4      9%       25   58%       13       30%        1      2%
      9           0       0%       10     22%       14   30%       14       30%        8     17%
      10          1       1%        8     10%       33   41%       31       39%        7      9%
      11          0       0%        1      3%       15   47%       13       41%        3      9%
      12          0       0%        1     10%        3   30%        5       50%        1     10%
      Total       2       1%       39     15%     110    43%       85       33%       22      9%

               Standards Based Curriculum: Engaged & Empowered: We
               changed our vision to better focus our efforts to better inform
               and engage our students.
26.At Bahrain school, all of my teachers change their teaching to meet my learning needs
                               Strongly                                                           Strongly
                                Agree             Agree         Neutral          Disagree         Disagree
                     Row             Row              Row              Row             Row              Row
              Count N % Count N % Count N % Count N % Count N % Count N %
Grade 6          1     3%        3 10%             8 27%          9 30%             3 10%           6     20%

      7           0     0%        1    6%         0    0%        6    35%         7 41%           3     18%

      8           0     0%        5 12%           5 12%          8    19%        11 26%          14     33%

      9           1     2%        0    0%         3    7%       10    22%        11 24%          21     46%

      10          1     1%        2    3%         5    6%       17    21%        24 30%          31     39%

      11          0     0%        5 16%           1    3%       10    31%        12 38%           4     13%

      12          0     0%        0    0%         2 20%          3    30%         2 20%           3     30%

      Total       3     1%       16    6%        24    9%       63    24%        70 27%          82     32%


               Supportive Environment: The implementation of differentiated
               learning is occurring this school year. Preparation began four
               years ago.
SUCCESS
   Is everyone's

Responsibility!
SUCCESS
   Is everyone's

Responsibility!
Use student assessment
data
                to
Design and Implement
Effective Instruction!
                to
Ensure Student SUCCESS!
The Focus for SY 2012-2013
   Continue to Strive for

   Quality
 Instruction
   Advancement Via Individual Determination (AVID) *
   Tutoring liaison with military members
   Career Practicum (CWE) *
   College Fair *
   College Forum
   Creative Connections
   Honors Band
   Honors Choir
   International Student Leadership Institute
   Junior Leadership Academy
   Lingua Fest
   Math Counts
   National History Day
   National Pi Day
   Science Technology Engineering Mathematics
   Robotics
   Junior Science and Humanities Symposium
Arabic Club
   Academic Games
   Art Club                 Recycling Club*
   Computer Club            Sailing Club
   Drama Club               Student Council MS/HS
   Frisbee Club*            Yearbook
   Future Business          Golf*
    Leaders of America
   Future Educators of      Cross Country
    America                  Volleyball
   Model United Nations     Basketball
   Model U.S. Senate        Soccer
   National Honor Society   Swimming
   National Junior Honor    Baseball*
    Society
                             Track
◦
       Algebra Lab*
    ◦ College Prep Course*
    ◦ Geometry Lab*
    ◦ Information Center Support
    ◦ Math Tutoring HS
    ◦ Math Tutoring MS
    ◦ ELA Tutoring /MHS
    ◦ Peer Tutors
    ◦ READ 180
    ◦ Special Education Aides
    ◦ Sustained Silent Reading
    ◦ Counseling Services
    ◦ AVID Advancement Via Individual Determination
   6th Grade Mission Possible*
3
         16




                      Bachelor

                      Master

                      Doctorate
34




              N= 53
61.4.1% of Staff
have been here 3
years or less.
PTSO
NSA Bahrain

More Related Content

Similar to CSI

Quality education for all –UNESCAP/LCD Conference on Disability-inclusive MDG...
Quality education for all –UNESCAP/LCD Conference on Disability-inclusive MDG...Quality education for all –UNESCAP/LCD Conference on Disability-inclusive MDG...
Quality education for all –UNESCAP/LCD Conference on Disability-inclusive MDG...EduSkills OECD
 
CCSS KickOff @ Santa Cruz COE
CCSS KickOff @ Santa Cruz COECCSS KickOff @ Santa Cruz COE
CCSS KickOff @ Santa Cruz COEElizabeth Calhoon
 
BPI Group Information
BPI Group InformationBPI Group Information
BPI Group Informationkathyaallen
 
Paris papers abdul razak dzulkifli
Paris papers abdul razak dzulkifliParis papers abdul razak dzulkifli
Paris papers abdul razak dzulkifliIAU_Past_Conferences
 
Edelman Trust Barometer, Nationalmuseum 2012-01-26
Edelman Trust Barometer, Nationalmuseum 2012-01-26Edelman Trust Barometer, Nationalmuseum 2012-01-26
Edelman Trust Barometer, Nationalmuseum 2012-01-26Edelman_Stockholm
 
(GCF2009) Professor Michael E. Porter- "Competitiveness and the State of Entr...
(GCF2009) Professor Michael E. Porter- "Competitiveness and the State of Entr...(GCF2009) Professor Michael E. Porter- "Competitiveness and the State of Entr...
(GCF2009) Professor Michael E. Porter- "Competitiveness and the State of Entr...Global Competitiveness Forum - GCF
 
Dinner Event HMH
Dinner Event HMHDinner Event HMH
Dinner Event HMHJimmy Keng
 

Similar to CSI (8)

Educational Software:
Educational Software:  Educational Software:
Educational Software:
 
Quality education for all –UNESCAP/LCD Conference on Disability-inclusive MDG...
Quality education for all –UNESCAP/LCD Conference on Disability-inclusive MDG...Quality education for all –UNESCAP/LCD Conference on Disability-inclusive MDG...
Quality education for all –UNESCAP/LCD Conference on Disability-inclusive MDG...
 
CCSS KickOff @ Santa Cruz COE
CCSS KickOff @ Santa Cruz COECCSS KickOff @ Santa Cruz COE
CCSS KickOff @ Santa Cruz COE
 
BPI Group Information
BPI Group InformationBPI Group Information
BPI Group Information
 
Paris papers abdul razak dzulkifli
Paris papers abdul razak dzulkifliParis papers abdul razak dzulkifli
Paris papers abdul razak dzulkifli
 
Edelman Trust Barometer, Nationalmuseum 2012-01-26
Edelman Trust Barometer, Nationalmuseum 2012-01-26Edelman Trust Barometer, Nationalmuseum 2012-01-26
Edelman Trust Barometer, Nationalmuseum 2012-01-26
 
(GCF2009) Professor Michael E. Porter- "Competitiveness and the State of Entr...
(GCF2009) Professor Michael E. Porter- "Competitiveness and the State of Entr...(GCF2009) Professor Michael E. Porter- "Competitiveness and the State of Entr...
(GCF2009) Professor Michael E. Porter- "Competitiveness and the State of Entr...
 
Dinner Event HMH
Dinner Event HMHDinner Event HMH
Dinner Event HMH
 

CSI

  • 1.
  • 2.
  • 3. We have our visit in April Pre QAR week of Sept. 24 • Capturing our efforts and conversations- KEY • Working as the P.L.TEAM- ESSENTIAL • Being in the “know” about CSI- CRUCIAL • Committing to the goals- NECESSARY • Imbedding effective intervention-CRITICAL • Using the interventions systematically and consistently -VITAL
  • 4. Making Interventions Powerful CSI Data Review Quality Indicator Map Formative Assessment Standards and Backwards design Differentiated Instruction 4 Stages of a Professional learning Community
  • 5. Differentiating Instruction in Content Differentiating Instruction in Process Differentiating Instruction in Product Integrating Interactive White Boards Deeper understanding and effective use of assessment tools and the data they yield
  • 6. Bahrain School provides students with a safe environment in which they are challenged to their maximum potential as responsible members of a global society.
  • 7. The Bahrain Middle/High School community Empower all students to reach their maximum potential as Engaged citizens in a global society. We are committed to Education using rigorous standards-based curriculum provided in a supportive environment. 3 E
  • 8. Goal #1  Smart Goal 1 : Reading Comprehension  All students, by June 2014, will improve in reading comprehension through increased proficiency in vocabulary with emphasis on academic/abstract language as measured through system-wide and school based assessments.   Instructional Intervention: Building Academic Vocabulary (6-Step Process)   Smart Goal 2 : Problem Solving and Reasoning  All students, by June 2014, will improve in problem solving and reasoning through improved proficiency in identifying problems, choosing strategies, applying strategies, and reflecting on results as measured by system-wide and school based assessments.   Instructional Intervention: Four-Step Problem Solving (I-CAN) .
  • 9.
  • 10. Algeria Argentina Australia Bahrain Canada China Columbia Denmark 58 Ecuador Egypt France 236 Bahrain 18 Germany India Indonesia Iraq United States Itlay 10 Jordan Korea Luxembourg Malasia Netherlands 14 Nigeria Oman 13 Pakistan Philippines Russia Saudi Arabia South Africa Spain Sudan Syria 425 Students from Turkey United Kingdom United States 36 Different Countries Venezuela Zimbabwe September 2012
  • 11. 81 US Military Federal Civilian 189 Federal Cotractor 80 US Government US Citizen 10 12 43 Foreign National September 2012
  • 12. Military Dependents Army Active Navy Active Marine Active AF Active AF Active, 3 Army Active, 3 Marine Active, 13 Navy Active, 66 Total: 84
  • 13. The average tour of duty is 2 years in Bahrain. Normally we would assume that 1/2 of our student population will be in their first year at our school at any given time. However, recent civil unrest and a mandatory evacuation in 2004 has made predicting our population movement a challenge. We do anticipate an influx of military students as more families are permitted to return.
  • 14. The average tour of duty is 2 years in Bahrain. Normally we would assume that 1/2 of our student population will be in their first year at our school at any given time. However, recent civil unrest and a mandatory evacuation in 2004 has made predicting our population movement a challenge. We do anticipate an influx of military students as more families are permitted to return.
  • 15. There had been a steady increase in our student population after the evacuation of Americans in 2004. The closure of the school in the spring of 2011 caused another precipitous drop in our student population, though it was not as severe or as long lasting.
  • 16. TerraNova Objectives (2010) Percent of students attaining High Mastery of each Science Objective Grades 6th 7th 8th 9th 10th 11th Science Inquiry 59 61 59 49 51 55 Physical Science 62 67 54 53 49 51 Life Science 65 72 59 51 46 55 Earth & Space Living 50 69 62 53 46 51 Science & Technology 69 65 53 45 Personal & Social Pers 62 69 Overall, students’ OPIs in Science were higher than students’ OPIs in Math and Reading, with the exception of the OPIs obtained by students in 10th grades. The relatively lower scores in Science Inquiry in grades 6, 7, and 9, support the necessity of Goal #2: Problem Solving.
  • 17. TerraNova Objectives (2010) Percent of students attaining High Mastery of each Reading Objective Grades 6th 7th 8th 9th 10th 11th Basic Unders. 53 67 35 56 53 53 Analyze Text 71 69 38 53 50 53 Evaluate/Extend Meaning 56 61 35 58 47 59 Rdg/Writing Strategies- 50 67 38 53 55 57 Vocabulary Vocabulary: Reading and Writing Strategies include Vocabulary Strategies. It should be noted that Vocabulary Strategies have the highest number of test items in Reading and Writing Strategies. In 2010, Reading/Writing Strategies had the lowest (or one of the lowest) percentages of students who achieved High Mastery in Grades 6, 8, and 9. Another area that showed a relatively low performance, although to a lesser degree, was Analyze Text
  • 18. TerraNova Objectives (2010) Percent of students attaining High Mastery of each Mathematics Objective Grades 6th 7th 8th 9th 10th 11th Number/number relationships 59 61 49 49 55 Computation & Estimation 53 58 43 56 53 51 Measurement 56 56 43 51 56 57 Geometry 59 67 51 49 53 53 Data, Stat, Prob 47 61 46 49 59 51 Patterns, Func, Algebra 44 56 49 56 64 51 Prob Solving & Reasoning 59 61 49 47 53 55 Communication 53 67 49 60 69 Problem Solving and Reasoning. In 2010, Problem Solving and Reasoning had the lowest or one of the lowest percentages of students who achieved High Mastery in Grades 8, 9, and 10.
  • 19. TerraNova Objectives (2012) Percent of students attaining High Mastery of each Science Objective Grades 6th 7th 8th 9th 10th 11th Science Inquiry 67 51 67 56 47 50 Physical Science 71 51 67 53 45 45 Life Science 71 59 69 62 38 51 Earth & Space Living 69 56 76 53 40 45 Science & 54 69 56 44 Technology Personal & Social 73 56 Pers From 2010 to 2012, 6th, 8th, and 9th grades improved in all areas. 7th grade decreased significantly, 10th and 11th grades showed some decrease. The annual influx of students in grades 10 & 11 present challenges. We have implemented more assistance for students.
  • 20. TerraNova Objectives (2010) Percent of students attaining High Mastery of each Mathematics Objective Grades 6th 7th 8th 9th 10th 11th Number/number 59 61 49 49 55 relationships Computation & Estimation 53 58 43 56 53 51 Measurement 56 56 43 51 56 57 Geometry 59 67 51 49 53 53 Data, Stat, Prob 47 61 46 49 59 51 Patterns, Func, Algebra 44 56 49 56 64 51 Prob Solving & Reasoning 59 61 49 47 53 55 Communication 53 67 49 60 69 Problem Solving and Reasoning. In 2010, Problem Solving and Reasoning had the lowest or one of the lowest percentages of students who achieved High Mastery in Grades 8, 9, and 10.
  • 21. TerraNova Objectives (2012) Percent of students attaining High Mastery of each Reading Objective Grades 6th 7th 8th 9th 10th 11th Basic Unders. 67 59 64 60 46 36 Analyze Text 71 54 71 64 42 38 Evaluate/Extend Meaning 62 56 71 62 46 42 Rdg/Writing Strategies- 73 56 73 58 45 42 Vocabulary We have seen improvement in Reading Comprehension in grades 6, 8, & 9, but the large influx of students in grades 10 and 11 present challenges and have led us to more powerful interventions. Grade 7 showed a slight decrease in Reading. We adopted more powerful intervention strategies: Marzano’s 6 Step process for Academic Vocabulary
  • 22. Mean Lexiles by Grade Level 2006-2011 GRADE 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 Mean Mean Mean Mean Mean Mean 5 925 827 957 893 925 925 6 915 946 920 1074 992 997 7 1191 1012 1087 1022 1085 1088 8 1259 1143 1127 1166 1111 1209 9 928 1157 1222 1196 1182 1173 10 . 1105 1214 1265 1235 1224 11 . . 1183 1309 1358 1283 12 . . . 1073 1295 1368
  • 23. Scholastic Reading Inventory September 2011 to February 2012 Results Grade 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Actual 15.06% 14.66% 12% 16.31% 8.40% 9.20% 14% Expected 20% 16% 20% 12.50% 10% 10% 20% Diff Actual/Expected -4.94% -1.34% -8.00% 3.81% -1.60% -0.80% -6.00% Below Standard Fall 2011 8 8 14 14 19 16 15 Below Standard Feb 2012 9 6 10 10 16 16 12 Diff Students Below Standard -1 2 4 4 3 0 3 We adopted more powerful intervention strategies: Marzano’s 6 Step process for Academic Vocabulary
  • 24. TerraNova Objectives (2012) Percent of students attaining High Mastery of each Mathematics Objective Grades 6th 7th 8th 9th 10th 11th Number/number 49 44 66 62 54 relationships Computation & Estimation 60 49 66 62 52 35 Measurement 53 44 66 67 56 44 Geometry 49 44 66 67 59 40 Data, Stat, Prob 56 49 68 60 60 37 Patterns, Func, Algebra 53 54 66 67 60 36 Prob Solving & Reasoning 53 49 68 64 61 43 Communication 53 49 68 64 61 From 2010 to 2012: Grade 6 showed decreases in scores in Geometry and Number/Number Sense. 7th grade decreased in all areas, but 8th and 9th grades improved significantly. Grade 10 was consistent, but 11th grade decreased in all areas.
  • 25. Bahrain School 2009 AP Assessment Summary AP ASSESSMENT N Count Score of 5 Score of 4 Score of 3 Score of 2 Score of 1 Calculus 19 1 3 3 2 10 Chemistry 10 1 2 1 3 3 Economics-Micro 21 2 8 6 4 1 Physics 10 1 0 3 5 1 Spanish 1 1 U.S. History 1 1 62 Students took AP EXAMS 6 AP courses were offered 52% of the students earned a 3 or better 8% earned a top score of 5
  • 26. 2012 AP Scores N Count 5 4 3 2 1 English Language & Comp 11 2 5 3 1 Microeconomics 23 6 9 6 2 US Government 2 1 1 US History 5 3 1 1 Calculus AB 21 7 2 5 1 6 Chemistry 6 4 2 Physics B 23 3 5 4 2 9 Physics C: Elect. & Magn. 3 2 1 Physics C: Mechanics 2 1 1 96 Students took AP EXAMS (Up from 62 in 2009) 9 AP courses were offered (Up from 6 in 2009) 73 % of the students earned a 3 or better (52% in 2009) 25% earned a top score of 5 (8% in 2009)
  • 27. 3.How often did I do school work during seminar? More than 1/2 Only All the time the time Sometimes Rarely or never Row N Row Count Row N % Count % Count N % Count Row N % Grade 6 7 23% 14 47% 6 20% 3 10% 7 3 18% 8 47% 4 24% 2 12% 8 9 21% 14 33% 17 40% 3 7% 9 6 13% 21 46% 12 26% 7 15% 10 16 20% 37 46% 19 24% 8 10% 11 6 19% 9 28% 15 47% 2 6% 12 2 20% 5 50% 1 10% 2 20% Total 49 19% 108 42% 74 29% 27 10% ENGAGED: As a result of teacher perceptions and student perception data we implemented Administration Seminar: a.k.a. ASKABAN
  • 28. 4.How often did I get help from my teachers during seminar? More than 1/2 Only All the time the time Sometimes Rarely or never Row N Row Count Row N % Count % Count N % Count Row N % Grade 6 4 13% 4 13% 11 37% 11 37% 7 0 0% 2 12% 4 24% 11 65% 8 2 5% 10 23% 16 37% 15 35% 9 4 9% 9 20% 20 43% 13 28% 10 11 14% 18 23% 28 35% 23 29% 11 6 19% 5 16% 8 25% 13 41% 12 2 20% 3 30% 3 30% 2 20% Total 29 11% 51 20% 90 35% 88 34% SUPPORTIVE ENVIRONMENT: As a result of teacher perceptions and student data, we implemented more structured interaction between seminar teacher and assigned students. We also kept teacher and seminar students together when possible from last year to t this.
  • 29. 14.To What extent were you aware when or how you mastered the standards in your classes? More than 1/2 All the time the time Only Sometimes Rarely or never Row N Row Row Row N Row N Count % Count N % Count N % Count % Count % Grade 6 1 3% 9 30% 13 43% 5 17% 2 7% 7 0 0% 6 35% 7 41% 4 24% 0 0% 8 0 0% 4 9% 25 58% 13 30% 1 2% 9 0 0% 10 22% 14 30% 14 30% 8 17% 10 1 1% 8 10% 33 41% 31 39% 7 9% 11 0 0% 1 3% 15 47% 13 41% 3 9% 12 0 0% 1 10% 3 30% 5 50% 1 10% Total 2 1% 39 15% 110 43% 85 33% 22 9% Standards Based Curriculum: Engaged & Empowered: We changed our vision to better focus our efforts to better inform and engage our students.
  • 30. 26.At Bahrain school, all of my teachers change their teaching to meet my learning needs Strongly Strongly Agree Agree Neutral Disagree Disagree Row Row Row Row Row Row Count N % Count N % Count N % Count N % Count N % Count N % Grade 6 1 3% 3 10% 8 27% 9 30% 3 10% 6 20% 7 0 0% 1 6% 0 0% 6 35% 7 41% 3 18% 8 0 0% 5 12% 5 12% 8 19% 11 26% 14 33% 9 1 2% 0 0% 3 7% 10 22% 11 24% 21 46% 10 1 1% 2 3% 5 6% 17 21% 24 30% 31 39% 11 0 0% 5 16% 1 3% 10 31% 12 38% 4 13% 12 0 0% 0 0% 2 20% 3 30% 2 20% 3 30% Total 3 1% 16 6% 24 9% 63 24% 70 27% 82 32% Supportive Environment: The implementation of differentiated learning is occurring this school year. Preparation began four years ago.
  • 31. SUCCESS Is everyone's Responsibility!
  • 32. SUCCESS Is everyone's Responsibility!
  • 33. Use student assessment data to Design and Implement Effective Instruction! to Ensure Student SUCCESS!
  • 34. The Focus for SY 2012-2013 Continue to Strive for Quality Instruction
  • 35. Advancement Via Individual Determination (AVID) *  Tutoring liaison with military members  Career Practicum (CWE) *  College Fair *  College Forum  Creative Connections  Honors Band  Honors Choir  International Student Leadership Institute  Junior Leadership Academy  Lingua Fest  Math Counts  National History Day  National Pi Day  Science Technology Engineering Mathematics  Robotics  Junior Science and Humanities Symposium
  • 36. Arabic Club  Academic Games  Art Club Recycling Club*  Computer Club Sailing Club  Drama Club Student Council MS/HS  Frisbee Club* Yearbook  Future Business Golf* Leaders of America  Future Educators of Cross Country America Volleyball  Model United Nations Basketball  Model U.S. Senate Soccer  National Honor Society Swimming  National Junior Honor Baseball* Society Track
  • 37. Algebra Lab* ◦ College Prep Course* ◦ Geometry Lab* ◦ Information Center Support ◦ Math Tutoring HS ◦ Math Tutoring MS ◦ ELA Tutoring /MHS ◦ Peer Tutors ◦ READ 180 ◦ Special Education Aides ◦ Sustained Silent Reading ◦ Counseling Services ◦ AVID Advancement Via Individual Determination  6th Grade Mission Possible*
  • 38. 3 16 Bachelor Master Doctorate 34 N= 53
  • 39. 61.4.1% of Staff have been here 3 years or less.
  • 40.
  • 41.
  • 42.
  • 43.