2. Introduction
• Risk Profile of Parties.
• Contractual Risk Allocation
• What is Insurance
• Contractor Insurances.
• Operator Insurances.
• Mechanism for Risk Transfer.
• Current Market Trends.
• Construction Insurance.
– Limitations
– Solutions
• Can Captives fill the gap.
• Conclusions.
2
3. Risk Profiles of Parties
• Operator
– As Owner or Lessee of Production Facilities
• Property Damage.
• Removal of Wreck.
• Pollution.
• Control of Well / Redrill.
• Business Interruption.
• Employees.
• Third Party Liability.
3
7. Risk Profiles of Parties
• Contractor
– Property Damage to vessels / equipment
– Loss of Hire / Business Interruption
– Employees
– Third Party Liability
• Removal of Wreck (contractual Liability)
• Pollution
• Collision Liability
– Professional Indemnity
7
9. Contractual Risk Allocation
• Indemnity and Warranty provisions are base for
allocating risk
– Knock for Knock
• Personnel
• Property
• Pollution
– Oil Company Responsibility
• Pollution from the Well
– Contractor
• The “Work”
• Company provided items Care Custody and Control.
9
10. What is Insurance
• Eventuality for loss or damage that is
– (1) definable,
– (2) fortuitous,
– (3) similar to a large number of known exposures,
– (4) pays a premium that is commensurate with the potential loss,
– (5) It is a “Pure Risk” – no possibility of a gain and,
– (6) not against public policy.
• Transfer of defined risks to third party (insurance
company) who has a group of similar risks.
10
12. Operator Insurance
• Property Damage
– Production Facilities
• Liability Coverage
– Comprehensive General Liability
– Protection and Indemnity
– Workers Comp. / Employers Liability
• Marine Cargo
• Operators Extra Expense
– Control of Well
– Redrill
– Pollution
• Construction All Risks
12
13. Mechanisms for Risk Transfer
• Commercial Market Insurers (Lloyds of London,
Composite Insurers).
• Mutual Insurance Companies (P&I clubs).
• Captive Insurance Company.
– Accumulate disparate risks in a single company.
– Access to “Reinsurance” Markets
– “Smooth out” cycles in the market
– Manage attritional losses where transfer to insurance
market is inefficient.
• Self (No) Insurance is not Risk Transfer
13
14. Lloyds of London Results 1985-2007
Lloyd’s of London pure year profit/loss,1985-2007 (£m)
£m
4,000
3,000
2,000
1,000
0
-1,000
-2,000
-3,000
85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05 06 07 08?
Lloyd’s recently reported 47% drop in profits for first 6 months of 2008 – largely as a result of
reduced investment incomes
14
15. CURRENT OFFSHORE ESTIMATE FOR GUSTAV/IKE – IN CONTEXT
(INCLUDES INSURED AND UNINSURED LOSSES)
US$bn
8
7
6
5
4 ?
3
2
1
0
Ivan Katrina Rita Gustav/Ike
15
16. The Long Term Trend
Net Premium and Incurred Losses
£2,500,000,000 300.00%
Loss Ratio (Losses/Premium)
250.00%
£2,000,000,000
200.00%
£1,500,000,000
150.00%
£1,000,000,000
100.00%
£500,000,000
50.00%
Prem ium
£0 0.00%
19 96
19 97
19 98
19 99
20 00
20 01
20 02
20 03
20 04
20 05
20 06
20 07
20 08
Claim s
Loss Ratio
Data from Willis
16
17. Current Market Trend
• Insurers suffering in 2008
– Reducing premium income.
– Significantly reduced investment income.
– Increases losses in specific coverage areas.
• Fall of AIG appears to be affecting market.
• New capacity arriving in market in 2009
– Insurance sector is seen as safer haven for capital.
• Reduced demand for insurance due to effects of
recession.
• Ike and Gustav hurricanes caused significant offshore
and onshore losses.
• 2009 may be year of two halves.
• Premium costs increasing by 10%-20%
17
18. Construction All Risks Market
• WELCAR wording
• Limitations on coverage
– Schedule A and B for Insured Values.
– Sub-limits apply
– Exclusion of “Faulty Part”
– Limited Buy-back
– Higher deductibles (>USD5 Million).
– Lack of clarity in interpretation of wording
– Limitation for Mobilisation and Demobilisation of vessels to
undertake repairs.
18
19. Effects of limitations
• Welcar does not cover all the exposures
Company and Contractor has in the event of
physical loss or damage to the Work.
• Significant exposures remain.
• Does Contractor carry too much risk for the
opportunity to make a return on the Contract?
• Operator or JV choosing not to buy CAR
insurance.
19
20. Solutions
• Indemnity for damage to Work from Operator.
• Limited Indemnity from Operator
– Difference in deductibles
– Reimbursed for areas for where sub-limit applies.
– Does not apply to “faulty part” which remains Contractor
risk.
• Contractor buys insurance to cover gaps.
– Professional Indemnity / Warranty Insurance
– Defective Part.
– Utilise internal funding – possibly using Captive.
20
21. Can Captive Insurers fill gap
• 100% subsidiary of the parent company.
• Only insurers group company risks.
• Very effective for managing attritional losses over the
long term.
– Auto
– Tools and Equipment
– Employers Liability / Workers Compensation
– Speciality risks not catered for by insurers.
• Not effective at providing catastrophe protection or
“long tail liabilities” without Reinsurance.
21
22. Conclusions
• Risk Profiles of Parties are not the same.
• Areas of commonality particularly in Construction
Projects.
• Insurance can provide a partial solution for managing
particular risks.
• Insurance should be used as a tool in a suite of
solutions.
• Insurance market is still very volatile.
• Entering period of a hard market.
• Captive Insurers can provide part of the solution in a
larger jigsaw.
22