Apartheid Essay

South Africa Needs Apartheid Essay
Thesis Statement: Apartheid may have been a horrible era in South African history, but only so
because the whites were forced to take action against the outrageous and threatening deeds of the
blacks in order to sustain their power.
United Nations members, and fellow concerned citizens, the world must discuss with the
consequences of the initiation of apartheid. Apartheid, the separation of races completely, has
become a horrible era in South African history, and has killed many innocent victims. However, the
blacks of South Africa brought death upon themselves. Therefore, please pledge your support to the
whites of South Africa in an attempt to save as many lives as possible in as short a time as we have.
One must acknowledge that...show more content...
In the blacks' case, each tribe or village has been given a separate "homeland," or designated place
to live, where they would be "a small community of men, women, and children, self–assured and
confident" (Achebe, 159). Unfortunately, just as the blacks misinterpreted the Christians' intentions
in Things Fall Apart, the blacks of South Africa have interpreted Mr. Verwoerd's intentions
differently, and think he is out to hurt them. This misunderstanding has led to a boycott of the
homelands, and greater tension between whites and blacks in South Africa. As the blacks have now
started to rebel against the government, and create "toyi–toyis," it is said that Verwoerd is beginning
to get frightened. The militant blacks carry AK–47s and machetes at their side. These so–called
peaceful people have unwillingly become his own worst enemy, and are "honest in nothing / but in
[their] clothes" (Measure, 5.1.300–301). Because of one misunderstanding, the blacks have become
unreliable, just as the Duke in "Measure for Measure." It is sad to think that one man's caring
wishes have brought out violent qualities in the worst of ways. Horrific things have happened.
There have been reports of people gathering in the streets in mobs, and resisting any form of
peaceful negotiation that the troops try to offer every day. It sadly, troops have had to resort to tear
gas and weapons in self–defense. The blacks, however, are no longer rebelling; they are ready to
fight a war. It seems
Get more content on HelpWriting.net

Apartheid and Afrikaner Nationalism Essay
History is subjective because it is a subject that is based on a person's knowledge and opinions.
While some events have obvious causes, other events must be analyzed to find their true impetus.
One complicated era from history that has a debatable cause is Apartheid. While some historians
cite complex causes for Apartheid, most people in the general public simply believe racism was the
root of the institution. While racism did factor into later practices of Apartheid, racism was merely
a byproduct of the social and cultural effects of the institution. When evidence is examined, the real
cause of Apartheid becomes obvious. This era of South African history was not simply based on
social practices such as racism; Apartheid was rooted...show more content...
The Afrikaners formed a separate linguistic and cultural identity that included a set of religious
beliefs that shaped their worldview. These developments not only separated Afrikaners from native
Africans ethnically, but also provided a template from which nationalist beliefs were based. This
connection between the cultural identity of Afrikaners and their nationalist ideology is found in the
events that occurred shortly after Great Britain annexed South Africa. Afrikaners believed that the
British would undermine the culture that had developed among Afrikaners by supporting the mixing
of Afrikaner and native cultures. In response to this threat to their ethnic identity, Afrikaners created
numerous political parties that advocated both a separate culture and country for Afrikaners.
Drawing upon the reformed theology of Afrikaners, political organizations such as the Afrikaner
Broederbond claimed that, "...God intended for each nation to develop separately...moreover, God
had specifically created the Afrikaner nation as His chosen people to fulfill a divine destiny in
southern Africa" (Beck, 2000, p. 111). Using a religious belief from the Afrikaner culture, political
parties were able build a nationalism that promoted the segregationist agenda that would later be
used for justifying Apartheid. So, Apartheid was not racist institution, it was merely a product of the
nationalist belief that the Afrikaner people had the right to develop as a

Apartheid In South Africa Essay
Apartheid was an act that South Africa performed. It seprated whites, blacks, asians, and others. The
rule didnt allow them to go to the bathroom together, live together, and they couldnt marry each
other. This happened because the afrikaners (dutch) took over this land from the blacks, and in order
to stay in power against them they seprated them. Unfair living conditions, country events, and
incredible people helped to stop Apartheid in South Africa. In South Africa a big part of Apartheid
that was unfair was the difference between the whites living conditions and the blacks. To put this in
perspective the blacks had 15 million more people yet they only had 13% of the entire land of the
country (6). Even though the whites had 4.5 million to the blacks 19 million the whites had much
more land than them,...show more content...
For example, Desmond Tutu was a black Anglican bishop and civil rights leader. He convinced other
regions to boycott South African product and supply. So it put pressure on the government to make
the black people free(8). He was a key part to ending apartheid he managed to get a bunch of
countries on board to stop South Africa. Also F.W. de Klerk, a white South African, became
president of South Africa in 1989. He relized how horrible they were to blacks and he stepped up
and handed the leadership to the blacks(8). He handed the leadership over to Nelson Mandela in
1990 and was the last country to have seperation due to color and race. Finally Nelson Mandela was
a black South Africa and he stepped up and gave a speech that motavated the blacks to step up,
also he led a group called the ANC which was a group of blacks who wanted to end apartheid(5). He
became the president when F.W de klerk gave it up. Also before this he was in prison for 27 years
for sticking up for him self, and his race. In conclusion there were many leaders the blacks had and
whites, who helpe end this horrible

Essay on Ending Of Apartheid In South Africa
There were many factors which contributed to the ending of apartheid. After years of segregation
and oppression of blacks, many different chronological events put together led to an eventual reform
in South Africa of equality and democracy for everybody.
However, the factor which I think played the most important part in the ending of apartheid was
releasing ANC leader Nelson Mandela in 1990. Not only did it symbolise a fresh start for the
country, but also a new found uniformity of its people.
At the time, this move by the government was quite unexpected, but in retrospect, an inevitability.
The prime minister of South Africa in 1989 was PW. Botha, however after having a stroke, and being
forced into bitter resignation, was replaced...show more content...
However, the most probable reason was that apartheid was no longer practical or possible to maintain
in the country. This underlying fact had been brought about by several events.
Fourteen years prior to Mandela's release in 1976 school pupils had rioted in Soweto, the result of
which had been many deaths amongst the children. The cause of the riot had been because of the
appauling conditions in black township schools. Classes were over–crowded, there were no facilities
and most importantly the pupils were being taught in Afrikaan. The language was not spoken
anywhere else in the world, and they felt that they were simply being prepared as slaves for the
whites.
The horrifying incident caused uproar in many other townships which lasted for months. Although
the government claimed the riots were unpolitical, the Soweto troubles let loose by far the largest
period of unrest in South Africa's history. It showed that officials were beginning to loose control.
In 1985 a partial state of emergency was declared in South Africa. This was as a result of further
violent uprisings and clearly showed the national's weakening hold over the townships. Black
resistance made many parts of the country ungovernable.
On top of all this, there were many economic pressures. In the 1970's, western business leaders
found that apartheid laws were effecting economic progress and people began to feel that imposong
sanctions on South Africa would be the only way

The Effect of Apartheid on The Lives of Africans In this thesis I will be explain the ways in
which the lives of the black distorted. There lives were very good after the Second World War,
they had everything going well for them, but it didn't last long. The foreword of Apartheid in the
1950's 1960's and 1970's destroyed this optimism. Their lives got worse and worse and they had
lost charge of their lives. I will be explaining how their personal lives changed, how their
movement was restricted, how their most valuable rights were taken away, how they had to live
poorly and how they had lost their education as well and last of all I will be telling you which I
think was the main reason for...show more content...
The act divided South Africans at birth into four racial categories––Black, White, Coloured, and
Asian––though these classifications were largely random, based on considerations such as family
background and cultural acceptance as well as on appearance. They wanted to make it easier for
themselves when putting everyone into racial groups. The mixed race families made it a
problem there was no way they could do it precisely because they weren't white or black. One
reason for this law was to stop the Cape Coloureds from being classified as whites. This made
their lives worse, especially the coloured families because in most cases each member of a family
was placed in a different groups which simply implies they were possibly going to see each other
again, and they would have to rebuild their lives with strangers, and they also had to stand up for
themselves because they had no one else. An example is the Du Proft family. Raymond Du Proft
was white and Diane Bassick his wife was coloured. They fell in love but had to hide so they
wouldn't get found out. They were lucky because they had five children and weren't caught. They
tried to be accepted as whites but their claims where denied. One of their sons ended up

Essay on Apartheid in South Africa
Blacks shared the pain of Apartheid in one of the darkest periods in history. Blacks were horribly
oppressed by tyrants who obliterated their happy, healthy lives for nothing more then their own
interests. Many Laws were passed that restricted blacks from the freedoms that all people should
rightfully obtain from birth. White South Africans took the black population by the throat, making it
hard for blacks to live as happy people. Black South Africans were held in a form of imprisonment
and could do little to fight back, causing Apartheid to be one of the darkest periods in black history.
Apartheid was introduced as a part of the National Party's campaign in the 1948 elections. With the
National Party victory, Apartheid became a national...show more content...
In the 1950's some changes occurred. The migrant labor act was abolished because the
government did not feel the need to segregate the cities as much as they did in the past. So
initially blacks were stuck on rural reserves most of the time and were being treated worse and
worse. This was called the Bantu authorities act, established 1951. On a good note, there were
people on the Black African's side from the beginning. Prime Minister Smuts wrote, "The idea
that natives must all be removed and confined in their kraals is in my opinion, the greatest
nonsense I have ever heard." (Smuts 1) Steven Biko wrote, " The government of our nation is
full of tyranny" (Biko 1) Despite all the fighting back, apartheid was a loosing battle for blacks in
South Africa until the late 1900's.
Apartheid took off in 1948 when the national party won the election. It was all downhill from
there for the blacks. In 1950 the population registration act was passed. This act classified people
as either white, black, or Bantu. The apartheid fooled other countries into believing it was a
lifting in a state of emergency. In 1951 many whites did not like the black people so a
commission was formed to set and regulate segregation laws. In 1952, Nelson Mandela and Tambo
opened the first black legal firm. This was a small step for the blacks at the time. In 1953 the public
safety act and criminal law amendment were passed which allowed the government to enforce

Post Apartheid South Africa
1.INTRODUCTION
In post–apartheid South Africa, access to sufficient and effective basic services cannot be viewed as
a privilege, but as a right that must be granted to all citizens especially the previously disadvantaged.
The local government is the only sphere that is able to manage and implement this right. The
provision of public services to the community is an indicator that is used to determine whether local
government is being developmental. Public participation is essential to ensure that the community's
needs are taken into consideration and disparate areas are prioritized with the resources that are
available. The Integrated Development Plan was developed to ensure that local government
implements its constitutional obligations...show more content...
Step 4: Internal analysis and assessment
Internal controllable factors are identified as well as the community's strengths and weakness.
Critical issues are prioritized according to variation in the strengths and weakness as well as the
potential impact that may be caused.
Step 5: Attainable goals and measurable objectives
To ensure short and long term sustainable growth, attainable goals, realistic objections, measurable
objectives as well as the internal and external analysis needs to be considered. Step 6: Strategy
development
Specific actions are formulated that will achieve realistic goals and measurable objectives. Strategy
prioritization is essential to ensure that the strategy that is developed is implemented with the
resources that are available. Decision–making in the community is essential but priorities need to be
formulated.
Step 7: Plan development
All 6 stages are analyses and detailed strategies and action plans are formulated and distributed to all
the stakeholders.
Step 8: Implementation
Strategic planning entails the allocation of scares resources to critical issues. The action plans need to
be linked to the financial plan and implementation programme. The action plan needs to be
recurrently monitored and updated.
Robinson (2009, 7) further highlights the importance of strategic planning in any organization due to
the fact that it aids in assessing current issues and formulates strategies to address them. Strategic
planning aids

Apartheid in South Africa Essay
Apartheid, the Afrikaans word for "apartness" was the system used in South Africa from the years
1948 to 1994. During these years the nearly 31.5 million blacks in South Africa were treated cruelly
and without respect. They were given no representation in parliament even though they made up
most of the country. It was not until 1994 when a black man named Nelson Mandela came to power
in the South Africa congress. Once elected Mandela removed all racist laws against blacks and all
other minorities. Nelson Mandela is one of the great leaders of our time.
A hero whose lifelong struggle to the fight against Apartheid in South Africa won him the Nobel
Peace Prize and the presidency of his country. Since his release from prison in 1990,...show more
content...
However, his successful evasion of the police earned him the title of the Black Pimpernel.
At this time, he and other leaders of the ANC created a new section of the liberation movement,
Umkhonto we Sizwe, with a view to preparing for armed struggle, Mandela said, "I and some
colleagues came to the conclusion that as violence in this country was inevitable; it would be wrong
and unrealistic for African leaders to continue preaching peace and non–violence at a time when the
government met our peaceful demands with force." He was elected President of the ANC in
1991, and on May 10th 1994, he was inaugurated as President of South Africa. I definitely have to
say that Nelson Mandella had a totally positive influence on everyone in South Africa, not just the
black majority but everyone. The reason is because things were really bad under the all white
leadership and many white people did not agree with the apartheid system. It is difficult to pick just
one or two significant event in apartheid history, so I would like to just briefly mention some laws
that were made.
The White South Africa government came up with many unfair laws to keep the black people of the
country segregated, these are just a few of the most unfair ones. – Mines & Works Act 1911
& 1926 –Imposed color ban on certain jobs, a white salary was to be higher than a black at all
times. –Natives (Urban Areas) Act 1923

The term "apartheid" was one of the most politically charged words in the second half of the 20th
century, and still remains notorious today. Apartheid translated from Afrikaans means "separateness"
or "apartness". However when the National Party came to power in South Africa in 1948, it took on
a much more sinister meaning and today is associated with racial and ethnic discrimination. The
roots of apartheid stem deep into South African history. It started way back during European
settlement, and was enforced and maintained right up until the end of the 20th Century. It will
forever leave a mark on South Africa and indeed the world; a dark period in human history from
which we have and will continue to learn.
Tensions between Europeans...show more content...
Apartheid came about in South Africa because of an Afrikaner belief of their god–given right to
Africa, which was also a racist one. Apartheid was therefore a means to support and institutionalize
their view on how the country should be run.
Apartheid was kept in place through various means, mainly the use of legislation and technology.
The main way that the government implement apartheid was through legislation. There were
countless laws and bills passed, which over time stripped black Africans' of their rights, all the
while favoring the white elite of South Africa. Race laws affected every social aspect of life in
apartheid South Africa. The early policies that were made when the National Party first came into
power set the base for the later policies to take effect and branch off. These policies embodied what
the apartheid regime was all about, notably two of the earliest policies made, being the Population
Registration Act and the Group Areas Act. Both were made in 1950, with the Population
Registration Act requiring al South Africans to be racially classified into either white, black or
colored, and the Group Areas Act which geographically separated the racial groups.
These laws and policies prevented the black population having the same privileges, standards of
living and status as the white South Africans. Under the apartheid system everyday life was greatly
affected by

Apartheid Essay
Apartheid Rusty Keller ENG 125 David Makhanlall October 15, 2013 Apartheid Children are often
different from adults because they are often unaware of the rules that adults abide by. Nadine
Gordimer held strong feelings of opposition to apartheid, which was a socioeconomic system in
South Africa after 1948 that focused on the oppression and segregation of the non–white citizens
who formed the majority of South Africa's population, and her feelings are usually a dominate theme
in most of her writing (Clugston, 2010). In her short story "Country Lovers," Gordimer tells not only
how this socioeconomic system has determinately affected the interracial relationship between the
main charters, who were childhood playmates who...show more content...
There are a number of internal and external conflicts in Gordimer's short story "Country lovers that
she uses to illustrate the control apartheid has over not only the main characters, but society as well.
We all are aware of the heightened racial tension between African Americans and the Caucasians in
the south within our own history which helps us to understand the oppression, segregation, and
control that this form of legislation can have on personal relationships and society (Custodio,
2012). So, it is not hard to understand how powerless Thebedi must have felt to prevent the death of
her child, if only she had some form of self–esteem or dignity, maybe she could have stood her
ground enough to save her child's life. Paulus when he returned from Veterinary College was totally
oblivious about the birth of Thebedi's nearly white child's birth until he overheard the servants
speaking about getting someone to do her chores until she could return to them. Even though,
Thebedi's husband Njabelo had claimed the child as his own, Paulus still struggles with his fear of
the child being discovered, and his anger and self–pity with his failure to protect himself from
allowing such things from happening in the first place. This is

Apartheid and Post-Apartheid South Africa
Seventeen years have passed and the Apartheid era has ended, but the legacy it has left behind has
caused South Africa's rehabilitation and self–determination to be an obstructed undertaking.
Unaddressed security problems of belligerent crimes and HIV/AIDS are a direct cause of the
failure to manage the aforementioned legacy (Vercillo n.p.). Back in 1947, the growing
desegregation which was caused by the liberation of India and Pakistan, helped spread the evidential
racial equality. The Afrikaaner Nationalists ofSouth Africa, led by Dr. Malan, believed that the
whites were a superior race and that the blacks were a subservient people; a menace in society that
the whites must be protected from. In 1948, when the Nationalists won the...show more content...
He fought to keep the ANC alive and in 1989, when F.W. de Klerk replaced P.W. Botha as leader
of the National party, Nelson Mandela was freed from Robben Island after 27 long years. Also
under F.W. de Klerk's regime was a special vote held wherein 69% of the white population agreed to
the equal distribution of power between the blacks and the whites ("South Africa's Anti–Apartheid
Movement" 31, 50, 52.). The first democratic elections of 1994 in South Africa and the Mandela
regime then followed suit.
After the seemingly unmanageable and age–old problem in South Africa was brought to a peaceful
resolution, the country had then become an exemplar for negotiating conflicts globally. The ANC
then travelled the globe, immersing themselves in the recognition that came with assuming the
position of the aforementioned exemplar which they have become (Johnson, 4). However, as R.W.
Johnson stated, "[...] the real miracle lay not in their being willing to enjoy the fruits of victory but
in the way that the National Party leader , F.W. de Klerk, had led the white minority to surrender its
power peacefully." (4)
Aside from working towards the reconciliation of the whites and blacks, President Mandela declared
the implementation of the 100 Days Plan directly after his inauguration. However, due to the lack of
funding, proper planning and the absence of a heads up to clinics and hospitals, the

What Is Apartheid ?
What is apartheid?
The word apartheid means "to keep apart" in Afrikaan, which is the language, that most of the white
people in South Africa speaks.
Apartheid is a racist ideology, and the goal is to separate the different races, and to give the white
people all the power in the society.
The apartheid ideology was developed in South Africa for hundreds of years ago, but it wasn't a part
of politics before 1948.
In apartheid, you split the population into four groups.
The black
The colored
The white
The Asian.
And it is your appearance that decides which group you belong to.
Where did it exist?
Apartheid existed in South Africa from 1948–1994. And in that period, the white people had better
conditions than the black, the...show more content...
In prison, he began to negotiate with the apartheid regime.
And it was also the negotiations that got him released from prison in 1990, and in 1991 he was
elected as the president of ANC.
The election in 1994 was the first election ever, where Mandela and the rest of the black population
in South Africa voted. And ANC got 60 % of the votes. And Nelson Mandela was the new president
of South Africa until 1999, where he chose to retire.
As retired he has been trying hard to solve South Africa's AIDS problem. 25 % of the population got
HIV or AIDS, and the number is increasing.
Influence in South Africa (and the rest of the world)
Nelson Mandela was the most important person in the fight against apartheid in South Africa. It is
hard to say, how South Africa would be today, if it wasn't for Nelson Mandela. Maybe there would
still be apartheid?
Nelson Mandela is known all over the world, and he's a symbol of struggle for freedom and justice.
The Nobel Peace Prize:
I 1993 Nelson Mandela and the white president of South Africa Frederic de Klerk received the
Nobel Peace Prize.
My thoughts about Nelson Mandela:
I think Nelson Mandela is a role model for a lot of people in the world, because he kept fighting for
his believes and he never quitted, even though he was in prison for 28

South Africa Apartheid And Oppression
aquan Montgomery
Ms.Isca
World History A6
6–5–15
South Africa Apartheid (oppression)
Oppression is at the root of many of the most serious, enduring conflicts in the world today. Racial
and religious conflicts; conflicts between dictatorial governments and their citizens; the battle
between the sexes; conflicts between management and labor; and conflicts between heterosexuals
and homosexuals all stem, in whole or in part, to oppression. It's similar to an article in south africa
that people have with racial segregation between black and white . Many people need to know
that indiviual have their own rights in laws and freedom . Everyone should have an equal rights
and better community . A black person would be of or accepted as a member of an African tribe or
race, and a colored person is one that is not black or white. The Department of Home Affairs (a
government bureau) was responsible for the classification of the citizenry. Non–compliance with the
race laws were dealt with harshly. All blacks were required to carry ``pass books ' ' containing
fingerprints, photo and information on access to non–black areas. The apartheid in South Africa
which was in effect from 1948 until 1994 was not only a racist policy which greatly affected the
quality of life of minorities in the country for the worse but was a outright crime against humanity. It
include with civil right that violence verses non–violence that the government could or

Comparing Apartheid In South Africa And Germany
There in only one huge difference between these places. In Germany the majority of their people
were not Jewish. In Apartheid South Africa the Majority of people were black, so the minority had
oppressed the majority. In Apartheid there weren't any mass murders, or concentration camps. Jews
were put into concentration camps to keep them locked away like farm animals, away from the
general society. South Africa had never tried to invade another country while all of this was going
on like Germany did. One other big difference is that in Apartheid there were organized armed
resistance from the country. In Germany there were attempts to have resistance but they were all
very short–lived and unsuccessful.

Nelson Mandela and Apartheid Essay
Apartheid, the strict division between white and colored people, for South Africans has always
been a big issue. The man who stopped difficult ways of life for people and communities in South
Africa was also their president, Nelson Mandela. Nelson Mandela was a man who put his life on
the line to bring people together. He was involved with organizations that would eventually help to
end apartheid throughout his life and lead countless amounts of peaceful acts that put an end to this
divide. Mandela was even arrested for what he was trying to accomplish. It was difficult, but once
he was released from prison, he finished what he and many others had started, he put a stop to
apartheid. Nelson Mandela caused for apartheid to be...show more content...
One large problem that occurred because of apartheid and was the cause of many protests was from
1961–1994, 3.5 million colored people and their families were forced out of their homes while
their property was sold for very low prices to white farmers. This was just one example of events
that were completely unfair to the colored population. Nelson Mandela was the person who
stopped these acts from happening. In 1994, Mandela became the country's first colored president.
Instead of trying to make the people who put him into jail for 27 years suffer in consequences, he
embraced them and used peace to unite everyone as equals, and not oppressing the people who had
oppressed him for most of his life. Apartheid was a very rough time for anyone who lived in South
Africa before Nelson Mandela and his peace helped to stop it.
Nelson Mandela was a man who learned from his previously violent ways and thoroughly used
peace to his advantage in his fight against apartheid, and in the leading of South Africa. Nelson
Mandela grew up as a peaceful person and in 1943 went to law school for his degree. While in
law school, he got very interested in politics and joined a radical protest group, the African National
Congress (The ANC). The ANC got into a lot of trouble with the government for their ideas about a
place without apartheid. Mandela was arrested in 1963 and sentenced to life in prison. The
government let him out of

South African Apartheid Essay
Have you ever wondered how it would feel to be considered inferior because of your race? The
people of South Africa had to endure racial inferiority during the era of apartheid. The apartheid
laws the government of South Africa made led to an unequal lifestyle for the blacks and produced
opposition.
South Africa really began to suffer when apartheid was written into the law. Apartheid was first
introduced in the 1948 election that the Afrikaner National Party won. The plan was to take the
already existing segregation and expand it (Wright, 60). Apartheid was a system that segregated
South Africa's population racially and considered non–whites inferior ("History of South Africa in
the apartheid era"). Apartheid was designed to make it...show more content...
The Mixed Marriages Act made marriage between the races against the law (Evans, 9). In 1952 a
system of "pass laws" required blacks to carry identity papers or pass books so the government
could identify and restrict them (Wright, 68). The "pass laws" were designed to separate the
population and was the base of the apartheid system ("History of South Africa in the apartheid era").
Apartheid had a major effect on the development of South Africa.
The government of South Africa played a huge role in apartheid. During apartheid the government
of South Africa worked to take away the citizenship of the Blacks with the laws ("History of South
Africa in the apartheid era"). "Social rights, political rights, educational opportunities, and economic
status were all determined by the group a person belonged to" (History of South Africa in the
apartheid era). Black people were denied by the government the option of appealing courts against
forced removals ("History of South Africa in the apartheid era"). Since the government had
established laws prohibiting social contact between the races separate schools and public places
were set up for the different races ("History of South Africa in the apartheid era"). The government
even tried to segregate churches in 1957 but failed (Pascoe, 80) The law system was very

Essay about Politics and Apartheid
Bloodshot eyes and skin stretched over bones, these people were living skeletons. The dark–skinned
citizens of South Africa could attribute their misfortune due to the state of politics in South Africa,
where prejudice against dark skinned people ran as rampant as disease and poverty. Due to politics
working against dark–skinned people beginning three years after South Africa gained its
independence, apartheid was established and fought for by racists and against by activists until it
was ended in 1991. The story of Kaffir Boy filled with personal insight and memories provides
information on how apartheid made it legal for dark skinned to be discriminated against and the
people politics involved with beginning and ending it, as well...show more content...
Under the Population Registration Act of 1950, families were split apart if they were not of the same
pigment. (history.com) The government did this to try to break down the eighty percent and pit
them against each other while turning them into a minority that could eventually be eradicated.
These divisions to create disunity worked, unfortunately. Mark was often threatened at school
because he played tennis and associated with white people. There were also multiple gang fights, and
oftentimes the boys would band together because of their situations under the law– a law that
believed that due to the color of their skin, they didn't deserve to live. These frightful beginnings of
apartheid took root because of humankind's refusal to admit fault and need to blame others. It is also
interesting to be noted that apartheid began similarly as anti–semitism did. Due to economic woes,
people are willing to point fingers at anyone else to get back on the road to prosperity. Regardless
of how the system was started, a government that does not serve its people can't survive. This
system of apartheid was the cause of many woes, so it was only long before upstanding citizens
decided to take a stand. Evil is only accomplished when good men do nothing, and Mark knows
this and decides to take a stand against the broken system and end it alongside his classmates. At
first, he is gripped by mob mentality and goes around killing and stealing from

Characteristics Of The South African Apartheid
"Black Consciousness and the defeat of the inferiority complex instilled by apartheid institutions is a
necessary precondition for progress in South Africa". (Crais, 361) The South African Reader and
Apartheid, 1948 – 1994 provide an abundant amount of first hand accounts that depict the clear
differences in life experience and lifestyles of the white and black South Africans. Both texts give
prime examples of what life was like under the apartheid regime from the precursors of apartheid all
the way to the end of a very divided era. Throughout apartheid, the difference between was black and
white South Africans was very apparent. Whites lived in better conditions, had better access to
resources and education as well as higher quality resources, while blacks were continually mistreated
and discriminated against.
Life as a white South African was usually pretty desirable and easy going. Apartheid Regnany in
Dubow's book describes some of the disparities between the two populations. "By the end of the
decade whites, numbering less than one–fifth of the total population, commanded close to
three–quarters of the country's share of income." (Dubow, 99) The chapter also goes onto the
describe the kinds of things that the whites were able to acquire: pools, a three–litre Ford,
ranch–style homes, and maids or house–boys. This displays that the quality of life was much higher
for whites, with that being side the benefits also made there way over to the black communities but
they were

Apartheid Paragraph
Apartheid were the laws passed in South Africa that separated whites and blacks and gave whites
more control, while robbing blacks of their rights. Apartheid took place from 1948– 1990, and has
been one of the most harsh and systematic violations of human rights. Unfair living conditions, tragic
events, and courageous people contributed to the end of apartheid in South Africa. The living
conditions in South Africa were very cruel during apartheid, and motivated people to end it. The
Doctor/population shows how the living conditions were better for the Afrikaners (whites) than
the Bantu (blacks). The blacks only had 1 doctor for every 44,000 people while the whites had 1
doctor for every 400 (6). This means the whites could be treated faster and better since the doctors
didn't need to worry about so many people. The care the doctors could give would to their patients
also was better for the white people because they had more money to receive better medications.
The land allocation also proved how there were unfair living conditions towards the blacks. The
Afrikaners had better living conditions with the land accolation because they had 87% of the land
with only 4.5 million people, while the Bantu had 13% of the land with 19 million people (6). This
means that the white's neighborhoods were less crowded than the blacks who had to cram into small
huts. Also, germs would spread faster in Bantu neighborhoods than Afrikaners because of how
spread out or crammed they were.

Difference Between Jim Crow Law And Apartheid
Jim vs. Apartheid Differences amongst people has been in existence for a very long time. The
time of segregation of black people in America is proof of this differences. During this time black
people have been regarded as second class civilans. The laws that were created during this time had
the purpose of restricting black people from achieve anything in life and these laws were called Jim
Crow Laws. Those laws were mainly used in the southern and border states of the United States. But
segregation did not only happen in the US, it has occurred in countries all over the world, places like
South Africa. In South Africa, there was a system of legislation, called apartheid. This system, like
the Jim Crow Laws, made racial...show more content...
For the school board in South Africa, if the black school is affiliated with a religion they close the
school. Other differences is that black children in the US can stay in school until they reach the
fourth grade, as for the South African black students, they go to school from the age of seven to
the age of thirteen. The right to vote in both countries were lost to the black people. The policies
had many restriction the only affected black people to the degree their right to vote was taken
away. There are no differences regarding on how their voting rights were taken. In both the Jim
Crow Laws and the apartheid it was not clearly specified that black people are not allowed vote but
it is directed mainly to them, for example, in the apartheid the law states the non–whites are
disallowed to vote. But the difference in all this is that the black people in America end up
receiving the right to vote unlike the black people of South Africa, although there were loopholes
that let a certain amount of black people in America to vote. In the end both the Jim Crow Laws and
the apartheid had the same effect on black people in both of their origin countries with the access to
education, the right to vote, and the effect on black people. Though there might be differences, they
are minima at best. The education is terrible for both countries,

Apartheid Essay

Recommended

Recommended

More Related Content

More from Cheap Paper Writing Service

More from Cheap Paper Writing Service (20)

Recently uploaded

Recently uploaded (20)

Apartheid Essay