STAS - Risk Management - Promotion Schedules
•
0 likes•303 views
Analysing promotion schedules in order to increase your risk management capacity of individual learners' learning ability and potential successful achievement, in your school.
Recommended
Recommended
More Related Content
More from Education Moving Up Cc.
More from Education Moving Up Cc. (20)
STAS - Risk Management - Promotion Schedules
- 1. Lotus High School Promo1on Schedules -‐ Dec 2013 Presenter: Dr Muavia Gallie (PhD) Education Moving Up Cc. E-Mail: muavia@mweb.co.za http://muavia-gallie.blogspot.com http://supervisingwithadifference.blogspot.com www.slideshare.net
- 2. Grade 11
- 3. Summary Grade 11 • 3 Failed; • 40 Passed; • 43 Total who wrote; -‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐ • 5 Poten1al Learners; • 29 Absenteeism Problem; -‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐ • Learners ‘at risk’ of failing: – Level 5 = 1 – Level 4 = 26; – Level 3 = 3 30 Crisis! – Level 2 = 1; – Level 1 = 4 35.
- 10. Grade 10
- 19. Summary Grade 10 • 5 Failed; • 55 Passed; • 60 Total who wrote; -‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐ • 4 Poten1al Learners; • 47 Absenteeism Problem; -‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐ • Learners ‘at risk’ of failing: – Level 4 = 22; – Level 3 = 6 28 Crisis! – Level 2 = 14; – Level 1 = 4 46.
- 20. Grade 9
- 33. Summary Grade 9 • 16 Failed; • 68 Passed; • 84 Total who wrote; -‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐ • 11 Poten1al Learners; • 53 Absenteeism Problem; -‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐ • Learners ‘at risk’ of failing: – Level 4 = 23; – Level 3 = 27 50 Crisis! – Level 2 = 2; – Level 1 = 2 54.
- 34. Grade 8
- 43. Summary Grade 8 • 7 Failed; • 52 Passed; • 59 Total who wrote; -‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐ • 8 Poten1al Learners; • 40 Absenteeism Problem; -‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐-‐ • Learners ‘at risk’ of failing: – – – – – – – – – Level 9 = 2; Level 8 = 4; Level 7 = 4; Level 6 = 3; Level 5 = 7; Level 4 = 5; Level 3 = 6; 31 Crisis! Level 2 = 5; Level 1 = 5; 41.
- 44. Summary – Grade 8-‐11 Total 8 9 10 11 Failed 37 7 16 10 4 Passed 209 52 68 50 39 Total wrote 246 59 84 60 43 Poten1al 28 8 11 4 5 Absenteeism Problem 169 40 53 47 29 Level 9 2 2 Level 8 4 4 Level 7 4 4 Level 6 3 3 Level 5 7 7 Level 4 76 5 23 22 26 Level 3 42 6 27 6 3 138 31 50 28 29 Level 2 22 5 2 14 1 Level 1 15 5 2 4 4 ‘At Risk’ to fail