3. There are so many cool things happening, there are so many cool people
doing/being/creating/sharing these things/spaces…
so why is there, not yet, equity..
4. ..we do need a mechanism/glue/structure/mindset in place ..
to coordinate/facilitate/afford the synchronicity/dance/
lines-of-flight.. our souls crave.. where
so why have we not yet crafted one..
a mechanism/structure
to facilitate the:
play
whimsy
curiosity
of 7 billion+ people.
every day.
(a means for each one of us to learn/live/swim in uncertainty)
as
5. ..that tiny bit of exclusionary ness ..
(we keep reserving the right to have)
..is just enough to keep us distracted from equity/us.
{aka: discrimination to infinity}
6. ..we’re missing the functionality/capability/affordance/realization of equity by
both:
discriminating/separating ourselves into groups/silos/labels..
not quite discriminating ourselves enough..
Here we are concerned with the coexistence of dissimilars, and the central points where
fusion occurs are many: the ears of the listeners wherever they are. This disharmony, to
paraphrase Bergson's statement about disorder, is simply a harmony to which many are
unaccustomed....New music: new listening. - John Cage
We are much more effective when we are non-judgmental, because then we are
standing in reality. This is the power we need to access, if we are going to change the
planet. - Charles Eisenstein
7. ..that tiny bit of control ness ..
(we keep reserving the right to have)
..is just enough to keep us from equity/us.
matters
Play, by my definition, is, first and foremost, activity that is self-chosen and self-directed. It is activity that you are
always free to quit. - Peter Gray
8. ..that tiny bit of conformity ness ..
(we keep reserving the right to have)
..is just enough to keep us from equity/us.
What if we trusted you? – Jerry Michalski
9. ..we need the eclectic/open/cross-generational people/space that
in the cityness affords every one of us..
10.
11. ..we need the time for whimsy/play/trust that
as the dayness affords every one us..
13. .. a mechanism with less maslow ness and more mate ness.. seems too simple
wrong
floofy
messy
unsophisticated
unacademic
unworthy
unmeasureable
unmarketable
chaotic
utopian
impossible
..
(what i keep hearing in the.. )