3. Case: Habtamu Aklilu 30yr/M
O Hx:
O Presented with RTA of 1 week durtion.
O Has no vomiting, seizure, loc but Has
headache since trauma that continued
worsening.
O No ear and nasal discharge.
O Referred from DBH.
O No previous surgery & known medical
illness.
3/26/2021 3
4. Pertinent P/E
O v/s: normal
O HEENT: has bilateral raccon eye &
subconjunctival hrge. No open wound.
O Neuro exam:
O GCS:15/15
O Pupil: mid sied & reactive to light
bilaterally.
O CN: all intact.
O Meningeal signs: +ve
O Lab Ix: normal 3/26/2021 4
6. Introduction
O Frontal sinus fractures account for 5–15%
of facial fractures.
O The thick cortical bone of the anterior
table of the frontal sinus is more resistant
to fracture than any other facial bone [2].
O 2*mandible and 5* maxilla:
pneumatization & thick anterior wall.
3/26/2021 6
7. Basics of Frontal Sinus
O The only paranasal sinus not present at birth
O Bilateral agenesis : 4%
O Pneumatization : begins after the 2nd yr.
O Radiologicaly evident at 8 yrs
O Adult size attained at 15 yrs.
O Anterior and posterior wall: 4-12 & 0.1-4.8
mm.
O Ciliated pseudostratified columnar
O Opens into the middle nasal meatus
3/26/2021 7
8. FS fractures pattern: four
Categories
O Isolated anterior table fractures:50%
O Isolated posterior table fractures
uncommon,
O Combined anterior and posterior
table fractures:most common
O Fractures with involvement of the NFD
or NFOT.
3/26/2021 8
9. Ix
O High-resolution 0.5 mm CT:gold standard
i. Axial : presence and degree of
displacement of anterior and posterior table
fractures;
ii. Coronal : floor of the sinus and orbital roof;
iii. Sagittal : NFOT injuries
O Endoscopic evaluation
O Methylene blue/fluorescine dye
O CT cisternography: fistula accurate
localization
3/26/2021 9
10. Why is FS # important?
i. Chronic frontal headache due to injury to the
supraorbital nerve
ii. Chronic CSF leak
iii. Chronic frontal sinusitis
iv. Mucocele
v. Mucopyocele
vi. Subdural empyema
vii. Frontal bone osteomyelitis
viii. Meningitis
ix. Brain abscess (due to spread of infection from the
FS
intracranially via foramina of Breschet)
x. Residual forehead contour defects and deformities.
3/26/2021 10
11. Mgt
Factors
O Location of the fracture, (Involvement of anterior,
posterior or both walls of the sinus.)
O Presence and degree of displacement of the
fractured fragments,
O Status of the NFOT,
O Degree of injury to the dura mater and brain (CSF
leak),
O The presence of other associated
craniomaxillofacial injuries, and
O Associated neurological injuries
3/26/2021 11
12. Treatment options
O Observation,
O Reconstruction of the sinus walls /ORIF/
O obliteration
O osteoneogenesis
O cranialization.
O ablation/exenteration
3/26/2021 12
13. Conservative treatment
O Bed rest
O Oral acetazolamide 250 mg every 8
hours,
O Laxatives and
O Prophylactic
antibiotics/vaccination???
O Avoidance of breath holding and straining.
O LP
3/26/2021 13
14. Principles in mgt of FS #
O Restoration of normal sinus mucosa with a patent
drainage system
O Eradication of the sinus cavity if the normal
mucosa or drainage system cannot be
reestablished,
O Creation of a permanent barrier between the
intracranial and extracranial systems to px
infection
O Protection of the intracranial contents
O Protection of the orbital contents
O Control CSF leakage/rhinorrhea,
O Prevention of posttraumatic wound infection
O Restoration of an esthetic 3/26/2021 14
19. Approach
O Bicoronal: work horse of frontal sinus
surgery
O suprabrow approach
O upper eyelid approach
O Subbrow
O Transnasal
3/26/2021 19
20. Choice of graft for Obliteration
of the frontal sinus
O Autogenous fat
O Autogenous muscle
O Autogenous bone
O Pericranial flap
O Allografts like lyophilized cartilage
O Alloplastic materials: E.g Hydroxyapatite
O Spontaneous obliteration
3/26/2021 20
25. References
O Greenburg 9th edition
O Youman 7th edition
O ENT journals
O Craniofacial journals
O Neurosurgery journal
3/26/2021 25
Editor's Notes
y 1/3 is isolated to the anterior table and 2/3 are a combination of anterior table, frontal recess, and posterior table [1]. Isolated posterior table fractures are rare
The posterior wall provides attachment for SSS (vulnerable in fractures of theposterior wall but is rare).
rupture is uncommon because thedura is tough and unyielding, and the sinus is often atreticfor some distance from its origin, close to the frontal sinus.
Prophylactic antibiotics/vaccination
Controversial even in the presence ofa CSF fistula
However, most ENT physicians recommend treating fractures through the nasal sinuses as open contaminated fractures, and they use broad spectrum antibiotics (e.g. ciprofloxacin) for 7–10 days.
If there is a CSF leak pneumococcal vaccine is recommended for adults age 2–65 years
difficult to diagnose even on CT scans.
sagittal reconstruction of the paranasal sinuses besides axial and coronal CT image.
Naso-orbitoethmoid (NOE) complex fractures, anterior skull base injuries near the junction of the posterior table and cribriform plate of ethmoid, fractures involving the floor of the FS, depressed or inferiorly located fractures of the posterior table of the FS, etc., are stronglysuggestive of the possibility of NFOT injuries
The presence of sinus opacity or air‑fluid level within the FS persisting for more than 7–10 days following the trauma/injury.
A unilateral air‑fluid level indicates patency of the contralateral NFD.
Removal of the intersinus septum (intersinus septectomy),using the osteoplastic flap approach, the so-called“Lothrop procedure,” or
When disruption of both the nfds is evident uponexploration or suspected due to persistent bilateral air‑fluidlevels, complete fs obliteration is the treatment ofchoice.
Endoscopic frontal sinusotomy /dilatation of NFD with stent/ for NFOT recanalization too is prone to failure.
FS exclusion either by its obliteration orcranialization.
CSF leak with minimally displaced posterior table fracture, an initial conservative approach by observation for 5–7 days withadministration of intravenous antibiotics, bed rest, headelevation, and if indicated, lumbar drainage at 10cc/h maybe employed.
if there is a persistent CSF leak beyond 8–10 days, FS obliteration via either osteoplastic flap approach or bifrontal craniotomy is indicated.
When disruption of the posterior table is more than 25%, andthere is associated dural tear and CSF leak, cranialization ofthe sinus with dural repair is indicated. Cranialization
is the most radical method of FS management.
It is obliteration with complete removal of the posterior table.
Anumber of autogenous and alloplastic materials have been used as fillers in FS obliteration.Autogenous fat is probably the most widely used and has the longest tradition [47]. Theadvantages of fat grafts include ease of harvest, minimal donor site morbidity, ample availablevolume, and favorable handling characteristics. However, complication rate was reported ashigh as 18% [48]. Magnetic resonance study 24 months post-operatively found vital fatty tissuein only 6 out of 11 cases of obliteration of FS via an osteoplastic approach. Fatty necrosisoccurred five times; whereas in four cases a transformation into granulation tissue and in onecase into connective tissue could be seen [49].The harvest of the fat is performed using steriletechnique: the surgeon will rescrub and a separate set of instruments that have not come incontact with the infected field is used. A transverse incision is made in the left lower abdominalquadrant, and subcutaneous fat is removed. Alternatively, a periumbilical incision can also bemade. Bleeding is controlled using monopolar cautery, but excessive cauterization should beavoided because it may harm the fat cells and result in graft failure. Drainage of the abdomenis usually not necessary. [46]Autogenous muscle graft harvested from temporalis muscle has advantage of being locatedwithin the operative field and being available in adequate volume. Like autogenous fat graft,this nonvascularized graft undergoes necrosis and eventual replacement by fibrous tissue.Donor site morbidity, including temporal hollowing and trismus, is unacceptable. [37]Autogenous bone graft for FS obliteration was first described in 1969 [50]. Since then,cancellous bone grafts, most often harvested from the ilium, have been widely used as a fillermaterial. Cancellous bone promotes re-ossification from both the periphery of the defect andcentrally. The main contributions of the grafts are their osteoconductive properties andosteoinductive factors that are released from them during the process of resorption. [51]Another advantage of cancellous bone over adipose or muscle tissue for obliteration is that itContemporary Management of Frontal Sinus Injuries and Frontal Bone Fractureshttp://dx.doi.org/10.5772/59096451is easier to distinguish radiographically in postoperative period between resorption, infection,and mucocele formation.[13,37] The greatest disadvantage to the use of cancellous bone graftslies with the potential donor site morbidity. [52] Much more comfortable and safer is to harvestbone chips from adjacent calvarium. It can be done using bone scraper. In case the harvestedamount of bone is not sufficient for filling of a large sinus, it can be augmented by admixtureof bone substitute such as demineralized bone matrix (Figure 10) [53].
Pericranial flap has been widely used in anterior cranial fossa repair, reconstruction of themiddle third of face defects, full-thickness scalp defects, and orbital defects. It is composed ofthe skull periosteum and the subgaleal fascia. The anteriorly based flap receives its bloodsupply from the supraorbital and supratrochlear arteries. Branches of the superficial temporal452 A Textbook of Advanced Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery Volume 2artery supply the laterally based flap. In contrast to all other avascular grafts used for sinusobliteration, the anteriorly based pericranial flap is composed of a well-vascularized tissue.The high vascularity makes this flap less prone to infections and turns it into an ideal methodfor obliteration of an infected cavity in a contaminated surgical field. [54]Allografts like lyophilized cartilage [55] have the advantage of unlimited availability and lackof donor site morbidity. They are easy to handle, well adaptable to the defect, and thus reducethe operative time. Nevertheless, a failure in revascularization or subsequent osseointegrationmay occur, with associated risk of infection and extrusion [56]. Allogenic transplantation maybe associated with increased risk of transmitting such diseases as hepatitis, AIDS or bovinespongiform encephalopathy.Alloplastic materials.Methyl methacrylate has been widely used alloplastic material since itsintroduction in 1940. It is well tolerated by soft tissues and has a density similar to bone, lowthermal conductivity, and acceptable strength. However, the material produces a significantexothermic reaction during polymerization and foreign body reaction has been noted when itis polymerized in contact with tissue. [57]Hydroxyapatite is a nonceramic calcium phosphate substance (BoneSource, Stryker Leibinger).It has osteoconductive properties, may be contoured to a defect, adheres to adjacent bone, hasthe ability to resist mucosal ingrowth, is resistant to infection, and is gradually replaced bynative bone without a loss of volume. It has been investigated in experimental and clinicalfrontal sinus obliteration, but no long term observation results were reported [58]. Currentlythe use of hydroxyapatite cement in FS is not recommended. Significant problems related tomaterial failure have been reported. [37]Glass-ionomer cement is a hybrid glass polymer composite consisting of inorganic glassparticles in an insoluble hydrogel matrix and bonded by ionic cross-links, hydrogen bridges,and chain entanglements. It is widely used in dentistry and also has been used in frontal sinusreconstruction [59]. However, because of severe complications after using glass ionomercement next to dura mater this material has been taken off the market. [51]Proplast, a polytetrafluoroethylene (Teflon) polymer with vitreous carbon fibers with poresizes of 200 to 500 μm, is extremely porous to body fluids. Fibrous tissue ingrowth occursrapidly and acts to mechanically stabilize the material. The material can cause a mild foreignbody reaction. [51, 60]Glass ceramic(bioactive glass) has proved biocompatible, non-toxic and bone conductingmaterial for occlusion of bone cavities. Total accurate obliteration of the sinus is achieved withdifferent sizes of granules and blocks. Uneventful recovery and clinical outcome were seen in92% of patients. Histopathological samples revealed a healing process progressing from thefibrous tissue phase to bone formation with scattered fibrous tissue and granule remnants.Bone produced by replacement of material was similar to natural frontal bone. Microbiologiccultures obtained with histological samples revealed no growth of bacteria. [61, 62]Spontaneous obliteration was reported long ago by Samoilenko (1913), who found oblitera‐tion by osteofibrous ingrowth in an experimental study on cats and dogs. His results wereContemporary Management of Frontal Sinus Injuries and Frontal Bone Fractureshttp://dx.doi.org/10.5772/59096453confirmed by later experimental studies that found subsequent replacement of obliterated FSsby cancellous bone to a variable degree. [51] Because FS after removal of all of its mucosa andoccluding the nasofrontal duct is nothing more than an isolated bone cavity, it is not irrationalto expect its gradual ossification. [63]