2. Introduction
Since 1965, and the Scientists and Doctors In clinics
thinking and observing the variation of the heart
rhythm.
Until early sixties the clinicians was ignoring the
variation in heart rhythm in practical cardiology. It was
even believed that heart rhythm variation is a negative
prognosis .
The first appreciation of variation in heart rhythm was in
1965, It was noted that there were changes in interbeat
intervals in fetal distress, in utero, before any
considerable change occurred in heart rate itself. The
Scientists and Doctors tried more experiments In 1970,
short term HRV measurments used on a Diabetic
Autonomic Neuropathy.
Late 1980, it was Cofirmed that HRV is a firm reliable
and independent predictor of death after an acute
myocardial infarction. The Clinical importance of HRV
then was appreciated (Nakagawa, et al. 1994, sited in
Task Force, 1996).
3. o We were able to quantify the vagal withdrawal (reflected
in the high frequency component of the time-dependent
spectrum of Heart Rate fluctuations) in the immediate
response to Changing position from supine to standing
and the more slowly following sympathetic increase
(reflected in the low frequency component of Arterial
Blood Pressure). (Akselrod S, et al. 1997).
o A postural change from supine to standing, the low to
high frequency power ratio was significantly increased,
indicating the augmentation of sympathetic activity or
the reduction of parasympathetic activity, or both. Thus,
It was suggested that a postural change from supine to
standing causes the predominance of sympathetic
activity. (OsakaM, et al. 1993).
o Our Results showed reproducibiliby of HRV parameters
when recorded in the same individual with a short time
between two exams, The increase sympathetic activity
occurring in the orthostatic position probably facilitates
reproducibility of the HRV indexes. (Andreao, et al.
2010).
4. Heart rate variability is the oscillation in the
interval between consecutive heart beats as well as
the oscillations between consecutive instantaneous
heart rates (sited in Task Force, 1996). It could
also be defined as the degree of fluctuation in the
length of intervals between heart beats (Callahan,
2001). Another definition is the amount of heart
rate fluctuations around the mean heart rate
(Conny, et al. 1993). It is a simple, reliable,
sensitive , non-invasive method that can assess the
autonomic supply to the heart. Terms like: cycle
length variability, heart period variability, R-R
variability and R-R interval tachogram have been
used, emphasizing more on the fact that it is the
interval between consecutive beats that is being
analyzed rather than the heart rate per se.
However, these terms have not gained as wide
acceptance as HRV. The field of HRV includes
aspects of mathematics, biomedical engineering,
physiology and clinical medicine (Conny, et al.
1993, Malik and Camm, 1995).
5. Subjects & Methods
o 21 healthy volunteers were used for this
study, most of the volunteers are medical
students from (2nd and 3rd medical year).
o All subjects were consented, and did
questionnaire to confirm their healthy status.
o Each participant was familiarized with the
testing equipment and procedures used in the
laboratory.
o The study was approved by the institutional
human ethics research committee.
o All volunteers were subjected to measure their
physical parameters (Sex, Age, Weight,
Height, BMI, Heart Rate, Systolic pressure,
Diastolic pressure, pulse pressure, Mean
Arterial pressure and cardiac work).
o All volunteers subjected to measurment heart
rate variability.
6. o During Recumbent position recorded for 3 min.
o Then, they were asked to be stand for 5 min.
without recording to allow the gravity effect on
the human blood circulation.
o After that they been 2nd recording of heart
rate variability for another 3 min. during
standing position.
12. Parameter of all Mean value +,– SD
Parameter of all volunteers (N=21).
volunteers
Age (Year). 23.05 +,- 5.25
- N: is the number of Weight (Kg). 79.95 +,- 19.68
volunteers.
- All the volunteers are male In Height (meter). 1.70 +,- 0.07
SEX.
Body Mass Index [BMI] 27.57 +,- 6.12
(Kg/(m)2)
Heart Rate (bpm). 73.10 +,- 9.01
Systolic pressure (mmHg). 117.00 +,- 11.55
Diastolic pressure (mmHg). 80.90 +,- 8.41
Pulse Pressure (mmHg). 36.10 +,- 10.49
Mean Blood Pressure 92.94 +,- 8.20
(mmHg).
Cardiac work (bpm.mmHg). 6810.71 +,- 1101.78
18. Average Heart Rate
Figure 1: Graph showing the mean
changes in average heart rate in
Recumbent position compared to the
Standing position of all studied subjects.
*P <0.05 which is Significant.
19. Mean NN
Figure 2: Graph showing the mean
changes in Mean NN in Recumbent
position compared to the Standing
position of all studied subjects.
*P <0.05 which is Significant.
20. SDNN
Figure 3: Graph showing the mean
changes in SDNN in Recumbent position
compared to the Standing position of all
studied subjects.
- No. of N = 18, due to 3N = Error
(Extrinsic).
21. RMSSD
Figure 4: Graph showing the mean
changes in RMSSD in Recumbent position
compared to the Standing position of all
studied subjects.
23. Total Power.
Figure 5: Graph showing the mean
changes in Total Power in Recumbent
position compared to the Standing
position of all studied subjects.
*P <0.05 which is Significant.
24. Very Low Frequency.
Figure 6: Graph showing the mean
changes in Very Low Frequency in
Recumbent position compared to the
Standing position of all studied subjects.
25. Low Frequency.
Figure 7: Graph showing the mean
changes in Low Frequency in Recumbent
position compared to the Standing
position of all studied subjects.
*P <0.05 which is Significant.
26. High Frequency.
Figure 8: Graph showing the mean
changes in High Frequency in Recumbent
position compared to the Standing
position of all studied subjects.
27. LF/HF Ratio.
Figure 9: Graph showing the mean
changes in LF/HF Ratio in Recumbent
position compared to the Standing
position of all studied subjects.
32. Correlation during
Standing Position
The correlates between the Average heart
rate Standing and SDNN Standing
changed to be slightly +ve (horizontal)
Relationship.
- N = 18, due to (Extrinsic).
39. The Conclusion
o We hypothesized that, the sympathovagal activity
is changing by changing the humans biological
organisms its position on the Earth planet’s gravity,
mainly and not only the Sympathetic tone is
increasing in the alert position [the positions other
than the flatting (180 Degree position)] such as
starting form the head up tilted to the standing
Vertical position (+90 Degree position) until (+179
Degree), where here I’d like to mentioned that the
standing position (+90 Degree) is the most Alert
position in the Anatomy of the human’s skeleton,
(when the human skeleton making INTERSECTS
CROSS shape (+), with landed earth).
o Where as Inverse relationship mainly and not only
the parasympathetic tone is increasing in the Non-
Alert position proportionally to the degree of the
position until it reach the most Relaxing position of
the human's skeleton anatomy the flattened
position.
40. Recommendation
We recommends the people, to do their active works in
the active positions the Standing or Upright position but
not for long period of time to avoid the stress.
Also we recommend the people to have relaxing and
sleeping in the flattened or recumbent position.