Redefining Homeopathy Homeopaths Cannot and should not practice Allopathy-Legally, Ethically and Philosophically by Mahboob ali khan ,MHA,CPHQ

1. 1
Redefining Homeopathy
Homeopaths Cannot and should not practice Allopathy-
Legally, Ethically and Philosophically by Mahboob ali
khan ,MHA,CPHQ
Parents dream and groom their children to make ‘doctors’, which is seen as a
good ‘money-making’ profession with high social status. But the child fails to
get appropriate ranking in entrance exams, and do not get admission to
MBBS course. Parents could not invest lakhs to ‘buy’ an MBBS seat for their
child. Finally, cursing his parents and his fate, he is enrolled for BHMS course
to get at least a ‘doctor’ label. He ‘studies’ homeopathy with indignation,
reluctance and inferiority complex. He never loves his homeopathy lessons.
For him homeopathy is like a hard dry coconut, and do not know how to dehull
it and relish its sweet inner kernel. He comes out of college after completing
the course with a BHMS degree. He is never a HOMEOPATH in his hearts.
He wants to make some money any how, by practicing allopathy. Such
‘misplaced’ homeopaths are making all these noises in the name of
“permitting homeopaths to practice allopathy”! Poor guys!
If a homeopath feels ‘allopathy is better than homeopathy’, and he desires to
practice allopathy, let him get an admission in a medical college and get an
MBBS degree, and then register himself under MCI. ‘ONLY THEN’ he can
practice allopathy. He should not practice allopathy on the strength of BHMS
degree. That amounts to quackery, beyond any doubt.
An MBBS and pamphlets supplied by medical reps are enough to practice
allopathy, it is simple. To be a homeopath, BHMS is only a first step. He has
to learn a lot by himself, through reading, meditation, experience and constant
introspection. It is really a hard job for a lazy man.

2. 2
A homeopath can and should say which is ‘his’ system. There should not be
confusion on that. Question here is not ‘which is better’ for ‘emergency’, but
‘which system a homeopath should practice’. He should practice ‘only’
homeopathy. Let allopaths practice allopathy.
‘Emergency handling’ cannot be used as a justification for homeopaths
practicing allopathy. Even an MBBS doctor cannot deal an ‘emergency’ case.
He will have refer ‘emergency’ cases to well equipped hospitals having special
emergency management units. In such a situation no homeopath can handle
‘emergency’ cases even if he is permitted to use a few allopathic drugs. This
talk of ‘emergency dealing’ is only a cover to mask their ignorance and
laziness to learn and apply genuine homeopathy. IF YOU GET A CASE THAT
YOU FEEL IS BEYOND THE RANGE OF HOMEOPATHY, REFER IT TO
COMPETENT HANDS.
MONEY IS THE REAL ISSUE. NOTHING ELSE!
Though holding BHMS degree, some people always compares homeopathy
and allopathy, and strives to establish that homeopathy is good for nothing.
They are totally ignorant of homeopathy, and argue to ‘modernise’
homeopathy by permitting homeopaths to practice allopathy. They never
learns anything from discussions, but think they know ‘everything’. They will
not allow genuine discussions on homeopathy. Fed up with such arguments
for ‘allopathizing’ homeopathy, I was finally compelled to remove such people
from my groups. They doing same thing on all groups.
People who fail in their practice due to ignorance or laziness desperately want
to practice allopathy to exist as ‘doctors’. They are looking for loopholes in
laws. Allopathic practice is controlled by MCI as per their laws. CCH is
managing homeopathic practice as per Homeopathy Central Council Act.

3. 3
CCH has no right to ‘permit’ homeopaths to use allopathy drugs without the
permission of MCI. As per Central Council Act, a homeopath registered under
central council of homeopathy cannot use any drugs not included in
homeopathic pharmacopea. All these factors are well known to everybody.
Homeopaths using allopathic drugs is pure quackery. A genuine homeopath
never think about it. Those ‘doctors’ who have a BHMS degree in their hands
but no homeopathy in their heads only need ‘permission’ to use allopathic
drugs. Why should people come to a homeopath for allopathic treatment?
Why should a homeopath use allopathic drugs if he knows homeopathy? And
you call it ‘modern approach’?
I do not think modern medicine is irrelevant. It plays main role in the health
care system all over the world. ALLOPATHY Hahnemann talks about is no
more. It is not fair to call ‘modern medicine’ as allopathy. Modern medicine is
‘molecular medicine’, based on scientific understanding of vital processes.
Remember this point when quoting ‘ant-allopathy’ statements of our masters.
Fundamental difference between homeopathy and modern medicine is that
‘modern medicine’ uses ‘drug molecules’ as therapeutic agents, where as
homeopathy uses ‘molecular imprints’ of drug molecules. This is a very
important difference, indeed.
MODERN MEDICINE has recently advanced into MOLECULAR MEDICINE,
where drugs are selected on the basis of scientific understanding of
pathological molecular errors in vital processes. Homeopathy selects drugs on
the basis of ‘totality of symptoms’, which are the real indicators of those
pathological molecular errors. As such, homeopathy can be defined as a
specialized higher branch of ‘modern molecular medicine’.

4. 4
Since ‘modern medicine’ uses highly reactive ‘drug molecules’ as therapeutic
agents, they can create dangerous ‘off-target’ molecular errors in the
organism. That is the main draw back of ‘modern medicine’. Since
homeopathy uses only ‘molecular imprints’, they cannot cause any ‘off-target’
molecular errors. Hence homeopathy is very safe when compared to modern
medicine.
Since ‘modern medicine’ requires a clear understanding of pathological
molecular processes to decide an appropriate therapeutic agent, they cannot
treat many diseases which are not well understood. For homeopathy, knowing
the exact molecular error behind the pathology is not necessary, since
homeopathy identifies the molecular errors and their remedial agents by
observing subjective and objective ‘symptoms’ that express the molecular
errors. As such, homeopathy can cure any disease even without knowing the
underlying molecular errors, merely on the basis of ‘symptoms’. This is a great
advantage for homeopathy. Whereas modern medicine can hope for an
effective treatment only for well understood diseases, that to with possibility of
unwanted side effects, homeopathy can treat any disease effectively and
safely.

5. 5
PRESENT DAY SCENARIO
Let those qualified in modern medicine do it. Homeopaths are legally, ethically
and philosophically not permitted to practice modern medicine. As a medical
system Homeopathy is qualitatively much above and different from modern
medicine, if homeopaths approaches it scientifically. I feel present day
scenario in India has become disastrous in the way that BHMS,BAMS ,BUMS
are practicing in high end tertiary hospitals in place of MBBS allopathy which
is very unconstitutional and unethical. Since the patient to doctor ratio in India
is 2000:1 and most of the high end allopaths MBBS are going out of country
for better prospects ,we are doomed by left over uncouth ,crude and poor
mans physicians so called BUMS,BAMS,BHMS /Homeopaths.I remember
Indians doctors are respected through out the world ,in USA at white house
there are 8 panels of Indian born physicians taking care of high profile
leaders. If homeopaths are not segregated from allopaths I am afraid that a
day is very near for hard earn physicians brand will become a black spot on
Indian medicine system.