SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 12
DesignofPseudo 3-DHydraulicFracturingTreatments
Hydraulic Fracturing Theory Manual
T h i s s e c t i o n d i s c u s s e s t h e v a l u e s f o r t h e fluidlosscoefficient and spurtloss
u s e d i n f r a c t u r e d e s i g n and/or analysis.The amount of fluid lost to the formation during a
treatment is a primary design consideration. Thelost fluid is essentially wasted and represents a
significant portion (i.e., generally 30 to 70%) of thetotal fluid and cost of treatment.The rate of
fluid loss is described by the expression
where C is the fluid loss coefficient, A is the fracture wall area and t is the time since the area
A was exposed to fluid. The loss coefficient depends on three separate effects as shown onFig.
5.15and each of the three have the square root of time relationship given inEq. (5.3).These
effects andhow they are determined are discussed below.The best estimate of fluid loss is
obtained from the pressure decline analysis of a calibration treat-ment (discussed in Chap. 8).
Fluid Loss Coefficient, C t The composite fluid-loss coefficient depends on three separate linear
flow mechanisms with theseparate coefficients, C I - fracturing fluid viscosity relative
permeability effects, C II - reservoirfluid viscosity-compressibility effects, and C
III
- wall building effects. In any fracturing treatment,each of these mechanisms acts
simultaneously to varying extents and complements the other.These mechanisms act
analogously to a series of electrical conductors and their coefficients arecombined as shown in
the following equation:
(5.4)
The fracturing fluid viscosity and relative permeability (i.e.,
filtrate
) effect can be obtained fromthe following equation:
Spurt Loss
The total fluid lost when wall building dominates is a combination of the fluid lost before a
filtercake has begun to form (spurt loss) and the fluid lost through the filter cake during the
treatment.Thepoint wherethefluid loss curveintersects theordinateon afluid
loss plotis known as thespurt loss (see Fig. 5.16).For fluids that build effective wall
cakes and low permeability formations, thespurt loss is low. In this case, a value of zero (0) is
used for spurt loss if the permeability is verylow (i.e., less than 0.05 md).Generally, the service
company supplies the spurt loss values for their various fluids.Table 5.1isan example from the
Dowell “Fracturing Fluids” book showing
C
III
(i.e., C
w
)
and spurt for anon-
wallbuildingfluidforvarioushighpermea
bilityrocks(i.e.,relativelyhighspurt)and
amountsof silica flour. Spurt loss can be
significant for moderate to high
permeability formations. Forexample,
assume a 500 ft fracture radius, 50 ft fluid
loss height, and 5 md permeability.Table
5.1shows 20 gals/100 ft
2
spurt loss even with 20 lb/1000 gal silica
flour. This equates to an additional20,000
gal of fluid loss which must be included in
the treatment design.
Fig.5.17-Wall Building for Various Fluid
Systems.
Hydraulic Fracturing Theory ManualFluid
Loss
5-25
December 1995
Fig.5.18-Silica Flour for Moderate to
High Permeability.Table 5.1-Spurt Loss
Dependence on Permeability and Additives.
FLUID LOSS OF FLUIDS
PREPAREDWITH J160
THICKENERJ160(lb/1,000
gal)Temperature(F)K(md)J84(lb/1,000 gal)
(Silica Flour)C
w
X 1000(ft/Spurt(gal/100 ft
2
)
2020201251251252.21.522.50205030.09.96
.00.07.959.030301251251.04.820205.04.21.
819.540401251251.04.820205.04.21.819.56
0601251252.93.120204.94.115.519.880808
0801251251251253.73.95.125.0203040503.
31.83.13.05.95.99.344.0
Permeability0.1 - 150
md0 2 0 3 0 4 0 5
0 6 0 7 0 8 0 9 0
1 0 0 0.00010.0050.0040.0030.00
20.0010.00050.00040.00030.0002WAC-9
Concentration -- lb/1000 gal water
C
W
- - f t / m i n
1 / 2
°
min
Design of Pseudo 3-D Hydraulic Fracturing
Treatments
Hydraulic Fracturing Theory Manual
5
5-26
December 1995
FLUID LOSS PROBLEMFind:
The Combined Fluid Loss Coefficient
Given:
Gas Reservoir: 170 F;
P
r
= 2300 psi,;
S
g
= 0.50;
k
= 0.1 md (buildup test);
BHTP
= 4000 psi
Lab Data:
@ 150 F(For Water Filtrate: 0.45 cp @
150 F0.21 cp @ 250 F)
°Φ
HC
0.125=
µ
g
0.0174
cp
=
C
III
0.001
ft
/
min
=
°°°
UFCIII:Calculate Total Fluid Loss
CoefficientR e s F l u i d
V i s c ( c p ) 0 . 0 1 7 F i l t r a t e
V i s c ( c p ) 2 . 4 Formation
Temp(deg F)170.P r e s s u r e
D i f f ( p s i ) 1 7 0 0 . C -
I I I 0 . 0 0 1
P e r m e a b i l i t y ( m d )
0 . 1 0 0 P o r o s i t y ( f r a c
t i o n ) 0 . 1 2 5 Compressibility
(lbs/gal)200.0((Clos Pres + 500(psi)-
Res Pres)@ T e s t
T e m p ( d e g F ) 1 5 0 . C - I =
0 . 0 0 4 4 6 3 C - I I = 0 . 0 2 6 5 1 7 C - I I I =
0 . 0 0 1 0 9 0 f t / m i n * * . 5 a t 1 7 0 .
( d e g F ) Harmonically Weighted Ct =
0.00085P F 3 C o n t
i n u e P F 1 2 E
x i t 0 9 : 2 3 : 4 0 0 3 / 0 4 / 9 2
F i l e : U F D E M O S F R C W e l l
N a m e : C A R T H A G E ( C O T T O N V
A L L E Y ) F I E L D UserID: ZWXY01U
L T R A F R A C 2 . 0
Hydraulic Fracturing Theory ManualFluid
Viscosity
5-27
December 1995
5.3Fluid Viscosity

More Related Content

Viewers also liked

Hydraulic Fracturing and Ownership Theories pdf
Hydraulic Fracturing and Ownership Theories pdfHydraulic Fracturing and Ownership Theories pdf
Hydraulic Fracturing and Ownership Theories pdfMavis Ekwechi-Whytock
 
Hydraulic Fracturing: Importance to the Industry
Hydraulic Fracturing: Importance to the IndustryHydraulic Fracturing: Importance to the Industry
Hydraulic Fracturing: Importance to the IndustryPorts-To-Plains Blog
 
Hydraulic Fracturing and Marcellus Shale Gas 11 22 2011
Hydraulic Fracturing and Marcellus Shale Gas 11 22 2011Hydraulic Fracturing and Marcellus Shale Gas 11 22 2011
Hydraulic Fracturing and Marcellus Shale Gas 11 22 2011Michael Klein
 
Hydraulic fracturing
Hydraulic fracturingHydraulic fracturing
Hydraulic fracturingAnkit Sharma
 
Fracking Presentation
Fracking PresentationFracking Presentation
Fracking Presentationdebjo33
 
Hydraulic Fracturing Presentation
Hydraulic Fracturing PresentationHydraulic Fracturing Presentation
Hydraulic Fracturing Presentationbishopcj
 
Basic Hydraulic Fracturing
Basic Hydraulic FracturingBasic Hydraulic Fracturing
Basic Hydraulic FracturingJames Craig
 

Viewers also liked (9)

Hydraulic Fracturing and Ownership Theories pdf
Hydraulic Fracturing and Ownership Theories pdfHydraulic Fracturing and Ownership Theories pdf
Hydraulic Fracturing and Ownership Theories pdf
 
Hydraulic Fracturing: Importance to the Industry
Hydraulic Fracturing: Importance to the IndustryHydraulic Fracturing: Importance to the Industry
Hydraulic Fracturing: Importance to the Industry
 
Hydraulic Fracturing and Marcellus Shale Gas 11 22 2011
Hydraulic Fracturing and Marcellus Shale Gas 11 22 2011Hydraulic Fracturing and Marcellus Shale Gas 11 22 2011
Hydraulic Fracturing and Marcellus Shale Gas 11 22 2011
 
Hydraulic fracturing
Hydraulic fracturingHydraulic fracturing
Hydraulic fracturing
 
Fracking Presentation
Fracking PresentationFracking Presentation
Fracking Presentation
 
Hydraulic fracturing
Hydraulic fracturingHydraulic fracturing
Hydraulic fracturing
 
Hydraulic Fracturing Presentation
Hydraulic Fracturing PresentationHydraulic Fracturing Presentation
Hydraulic Fracturing Presentation
 
Hydraulic Fracturing 101
Hydraulic Fracturing 101Hydraulic Fracturing 101
Hydraulic Fracturing 101
 
Basic Hydraulic Fracturing
Basic Hydraulic FracturingBasic Hydraulic Fracturing
Basic Hydraulic Fracturing
 

Similar to Bp frac manual

The Importance of Contact, Conductivity, and Connectivity in Multifractured ...
The Importance of Contact, Conductivity, and Connectivity in  Multifractured ...The Importance of Contact, Conductivity, and Connectivity in  Multifractured ...
The Importance of Contact, Conductivity, and Connectivity in Multifractured ...Society of Petroleum Engineers
 
Dcc5143 ch7-1-jun2016
Dcc5143 ch7-1-jun2016Dcc5143 ch7-1-jun2016
Dcc5143 ch7-1-jun2016Uddin Jc
 
friction loss along a pipe
friction loss along a pipefriction loss along a pipe
friction loss along a pipeSaif al-din ali
 
Q921 de2 lec5 v1
Q921 de2 lec5 v1Q921 de2 lec5 v1
Q921 de2 lec5 v1AFATous
 
A study on evacuation performance of sit type water closet by computational f...
A study on evacuation performance of sit type water closet by computational f...A study on evacuation performance of sit type water closet by computational f...
A study on evacuation performance of sit type water closet by computational f...combi07
 
CFD analysis of flow through T-Junction of pipe
CFD analysis of flow through  T-Junction of pipeCFD analysis of flow through  T-Junction of pipe
CFD analysis of flow through T-Junction of pipeIRJET Journal
 
Prediction of carry over coefficient for fluid flow through teeth on rotor l...
Prediction of carry  over coefficient for fluid flow through teeth on rotor l...Prediction of carry  over coefficient for fluid flow through teeth on rotor l...
Prediction of carry over coefficient for fluid flow through teeth on rotor l...Alexander Decker
 
391861703-Mod-5-Fan-Measurement-and-Testing.pdf
391861703-Mod-5-Fan-Measurement-and-Testing.pdf391861703-Mod-5-Fan-Measurement-and-Testing.pdf
391861703-Mod-5-Fan-Measurement-and-Testing.pdfBlentBulut5
 
HGSC Technique Presentation2.pptx
HGSC Technique Presentation2.pptxHGSC Technique Presentation2.pptx
HGSC Technique Presentation2.pptxhansinagengprakoso1
 
Q922+de2+l05 v1
Q922+de2+l05 v1Q922+de2+l05 v1
Q922+de2+l05 v1AFATous
 
Basic concept for structures with damping devices
Basic concept for structures with damping devicesBasic concept for structures with damping devices
Basic concept for structures with damping devicesF.R. Khan
 
Fluid solid coupled simulation and experimental validation of f fluid flow in...
Fluid solid coupled simulation and experimental validation of f fluid flow in...Fluid solid coupled simulation and experimental validation of f fluid flow in...
Fluid solid coupled simulation and experimental validation of f fluid flow in...eSAT Publishing House
 
Fluid solid coupled simulation and experimental validation of f fluid flow in...
Fluid solid coupled simulation and experimental validation of f fluid flow in...Fluid solid coupled simulation and experimental validation of f fluid flow in...
Fluid solid coupled simulation and experimental validation of f fluid flow in...eSAT Journals
 
International Journal of Engineering Research and Development
International Journal of Engineering Research and DevelopmentInternational Journal of Engineering Research and Development
International Journal of Engineering Research and DevelopmentIJERD Editor
 
Evaluation of Air Flow Characteristics of Aerostatic Thrust Porous Bearings: ...
Evaluation of Air Flow Characteristics of Aerostatic Thrust Porous Bearings: ...Evaluation of Air Flow Characteristics of Aerostatic Thrust Porous Bearings: ...
Evaluation of Air Flow Characteristics of Aerostatic Thrust Porous Bearings: ...Crimsonpublishers-Mechanicalengineering
 
Well_Engineering_and_Construction_by_Hus.pdf
Well_Engineering_and_Construction_by_Hus.pdfWell_Engineering_and_Construction_by_Hus.pdf
Well_Engineering_and_Construction_by_Hus.pdfAdlane3
 

Similar to Bp frac manual (20)

The Importance of Contact, Conductivity, and Connectivity in Multifractured ...
The Importance of Contact, Conductivity, and Connectivity in  Multifractured ...The Importance of Contact, Conductivity, and Connectivity in  Multifractured ...
The Importance of Contact, Conductivity, and Connectivity in Multifractured ...
 
Dcc5143 ch7-1-jun2016
Dcc5143 ch7-1-jun2016Dcc5143 ch7-1-jun2016
Dcc5143 ch7-1-jun2016
 
friction loss along a pipe
friction loss along a pipefriction loss along a pipe
friction loss along a pipe
 
Q921 de2 lec5 v1
Q921 de2 lec5 v1Q921 de2 lec5 v1
Q921 de2 lec5 v1
 
A study on evacuation performance of sit type water closet by computational f...
A study on evacuation performance of sit type water closet by computational f...A study on evacuation performance of sit type water closet by computational f...
A study on evacuation performance of sit type water closet by computational f...
 
CFD analysis of flow through T-Junction of pipe
CFD analysis of flow through  T-Junction of pipeCFD analysis of flow through  T-Junction of pipe
CFD analysis of flow through T-Junction of pipe
 
Prediction of carry over coefficient for fluid flow through teeth on rotor l...
Prediction of carry  over coefficient for fluid flow through teeth on rotor l...Prediction of carry  over coefficient for fluid flow through teeth on rotor l...
Prediction of carry over coefficient for fluid flow through teeth on rotor l...
 
391861703-Mod-5-Fan-Measurement-and-Testing.pdf
391861703-Mod-5-Fan-Measurement-and-Testing.pdf391861703-Mod-5-Fan-Measurement-and-Testing.pdf
391861703-Mod-5-Fan-Measurement-and-Testing.pdf
 
HGSC Technique Presentation2.pptx
HGSC Technique Presentation2.pptxHGSC Technique Presentation2.pptx
HGSC Technique Presentation2.pptx
 
Duct design st
Duct design stDuct design st
Duct design st
 
Q922+de2+l05 v1
Q922+de2+l05 v1Q922+de2+l05 v1
Q922+de2+l05 v1
 
Basic concept for structures with damping devices
Basic concept for structures with damping devicesBasic concept for structures with damping devices
Basic concept for structures with damping devices
 
Fluids Mechanics.pdf
Fluids Mechanics.pdfFluids Mechanics.pdf
Fluids Mechanics.pdf
 
T130403141145
T130403141145T130403141145
T130403141145
 
Fluid solid coupled simulation and experimental validation of f fluid flow in...
Fluid solid coupled simulation and experimental validation of f fluid flow in...Fluid solid coupled simulation and experimental validation of f fluid flow in...
Fluid solid coupled simulation and experimental validation of f fluid flow in...
 
Fluid solid coupled simulation and experimental validation of f fluid flow in...
Fluid solid coupled simulation and experimental validation of f fluid flow in...Fluid solid coupled simulation and experimental validation of f fluid flow in...
Fluid solid coupled simulation and experimental validation of f fluid flow in...
 
E1072850
E1072850E1072850
E1072850
 
International Journal of Engineering Research and Development
International Journal of Engineering Research and DevelopmentInternational Journal of Engineering Research and Development
International Journal of Engineering Research and Development
 
Evaluation of Air Flow Characteristics of Aerostatic Thrust Porous Bearings: ...
Evaluation of Air Flow Characteristics of Aerostatic Thrust Porous Bearings: ...Evaluation of Air Flow Characteristics of Aerostatic Thrust Porous Bearings: ...
Evaluation of Air Flow Characteristics of Aerostatic Thrust Porous Bearings: ...
 
Well_Engineering_and_Construction_by_Hus.pdf
Well_Engineering_and_Construction_by_Hus.pdfWell_Engineering_and_Construction_by_Hus.pdf
Well_Engineering_and_Construction_by_Hus.pdf
 

Bp frac manual

  • 1. DesignofPseudo 3-DHydraulicFracturingTreatments Hydraulic Fracturing Theory Manual T h i s s e c t i o n d i s c u s s e s t h e v a l u e s f o r t h e fluidlosscoefficient and spurtloss u s e d i n f r a c t u r e d e s i g n and/or analysis.The amount of fluid lost to the formation during a treatment is a primary design consideration. Thelost fluid is essentially wasted and represents a significant portion (i.e., generally 30 to 70%) of thetotal fluid and cost of treatment.The rate of fluid loss is described by the expression where C is the fluid loss coefficient, A is the fracture wall area and t is the time since the area A was exposed to fluid. The loss coefficient depends on three separate effects as shown onFig. 5.15and each of the three have the square root of time relationship given inEq. (5.3).These effects andhow they are determined are discussed below.The best estimate of fluid loss is obtained from the pressure decline analysis of a calibration treat-ment (discussed in Chap. 8). Fluid Loss Coefficient, C t The composite fluid-loss coefficient depends on three separate linear flow mechanisms with theseparate coefficients, C I - fracturing fluid viscosity relative permeability effects, C II - reservoirfluid viscosity-compressibility effects, and C III - wall building effects. In any fracturing treatment,each of these mechanisms acts simultaneously to varying extents and complements the other.These mechanisms act analogously to a series of electrical conductors and their coefficients arecombined as shown in the following equation: (5.4) The fracturing fluid viscosity and relative permeability (i.e., filtrate ) effect can be obtained fromthe following equation:
  • 2. Spurt Loss The total fluid lost when wall building dominates is a combination of the fluid lost before a filtercake has begun to form (spurt loss) and the fluid lost through the filter cake during the treatment.Thepoint wherethefluid loss curveintersects theordinateon afluid loss plotis known as thespurt loss (see Fig. 5.16).For fluids that build effective wall cakes and low permeability formations, thespurt loss is low. In this case, a value of zero (0) is used for spurt loss if the permeability is verylow (i.e., less than 0.05 md).Generally, the service company supplies the spurt loss values for their various fluids.Table 5.1isan example from the Dowell “Fracturing Fluids” book showing C
  • 3. III (i.e., C w ) and spurt for anon- wallbuildingfluidforvarioushighpermea bilityrocks(i.e.,relativelyhighspurt)and amountsof silica flour. Spurt loss can be significant for moderate to high permeability formations. Forexample, assume a 500 ft fracture radius, 50 ft fluid loss height, and 5 md permeability.Table 5.1shows 20 gals/100 ft 2 spurt loss even with 20 lb/1000 gal silica flour. This equates to an additional20,000 gal of fluid loss which must be included in the treatment design. Fig.5.17-Wall Building for Various Fluid Systems.
  • 4.
  • 5. Hydraulic Fracturing Theory ManualFluid Loss 5-25 December 1995 Fig.5.18-Silica Flour for Moderate to High Permeability.Table 5.1-Spurt Loss Dependence on Permeability and Additives. FLUID LOSS OF FLUIDS PREPAREDWITH J160 THICKENERJ160(lb/1,000 gal)Temperature(F)K(md)J84(lb/1,000 gal) (Silica Flour)C w X 1000(ft/Spurt(gal/100 ft 2 ) 2020201251251252.21.522.50205030.09.96 .00.07.959.030301251251.04.820205.04.21. 819.540401251251.04.820205.04.21.819.56 0601251252.93.120204.94.115.519.880808
  • 6. 0801251251251253.73.95.125.0203040503. 31.83.13.05.95.99.344.0 Permeability0.1 - 150 md0 2 0 3 0 4 0 5 0 6 0 7 0 8 0 9 0 1 0 0 0.00010.0050.0040.0030.00 20.0010.00050.00040.00030.0002WAC-9 Concentration -- lb/1000 gal water C W - - f t / m i n 1 / 2 ° min
  • 7.
  • 8. Design of Pseudo 3-D Hydraulic Fracturing Treatments Hydraulic Fracturing Theory Manual 5 5-26 December 1995 FLUID LOSS PROBLEMFind: The Combined Fluid Loss Coefficient Given: Gas Reservoir: 170 F; P r = 2300 psi,; S g = 0.50; k = 0.1 md (buildup test); BHTP
  • 9. = 4000 psi Lab Data: @ 150 F(For Water Filtrate: 0.45 cp @ 150 F0.21 cp @ 250 F) °Φ HC 0.125= µ g 0.0174 cp = C III 0.001 ft / min = °°°
  • 10. UFCIII:Calculate Total Fluid Loss CoefficientR e s F l u i d V i s c ( c p ) 0 . 0 1 7 F i l t r a t e V i s c ( c p ) 2 . 4 Formation Temp(deg F)170.P r e s s u r e D i f f ( p s i ) 1 7 0 0 . C - I I I 0 . 0 0 1 P e r m e a b i l i t y ( m d ) 0 . 1 0 0 P o r o s i t y ( f r a c t i o n ) 0 . 1 2 5 Compressibility (lbs/gal)200.0((Clos Pres + 500(psi)- Res Pres)@ T e s t T e m p ( d e g F ) 1 5 0 . C - I = 0 . 0 0 4 4 6 3 C - I I = 0 . 0 2 6 5 1 7 C - I I I = 0 . 0 0 1 0 9 0 f t / m i n * * . 5 a t 1 7 0 . ( d e g F ) Harmonically Weighted Ct = 0.00085P F 3 C o n t i n u e P F 1 2 E x i t 0 9 : 2 3 : 4 0 0 3 / 0 4 / 9 2 F i l e : U F D E M O S F R C W e l l N a m e : C A R T H A G E ( C O T T O N V A L L E Y ) F I E L D UserID: ZWXY01U L T R A F R A C 2 . 0
  • 11.
  • 12. Hydraulic Fracturing Theory ManualFluid Viscosity 5-27 December 1995 5.3Fluid Viscosity