SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 11
Anastasia, Lauren and Lucy 
Present… 
The Sea of Red – The Tower of London
1. What event did we choose? 
The Tower of London remembers WW1. 888,246 ceramic poppies were made, each 
to represent a soldier that died in support of Britain 
2. Why did we choose it? 
We chose the event because it was current and it was a big news story as it has 
been 100 years since the start of WW1, it was so important to so many people and 
still is so important. 
3. When did it happen? 
The War and Friendships talk we attended was on the 27th October and the day 
we attended the Tower of London was on the 29th October.
4. Research into the event beforehand. 
We did some background research on the First World War, and the adult talk we 
attended, 
featured guest speakers, so we did some background research on these 
individuals also 
5. Planning the event. 
As we were the only group in the class to pick our own event we had to find our 
own news and background information. 
6. Looking at other multimedia websites for ideas, 
and what we learnt. 
Originally we were doing a Wordpress site so we looked at the example from last 
year (damedash2013) to try and get inspiration for layouts. Because we chose 
weebly in the end we just thought of our own ideas.
7. How we organised the team. 
We allocated roles at the start of the process to help us have a starting point: 
Anastasia: Web Editor - Lucy: Multimedia Editor - Lauren:Social Media Editor 
We stuck to this plan, but as time went by and we got used to the multimedia tools 
and our website, we all got more involved with the different roles. 
8. What we did first when we got to the event. 
When we first got there we sourced the best places for interviews, photographs 
and videos. We did this both inside and out of the tower. 
9. How we organised ourselves with regards to 
allocating roles and tasks. 
Originally we chose three key roles - web editor (Anastasia) social media editor 
(Lauren) and multimedia editor (Lucy). Each of us had slightly more input on these 
chosen roles e.g I ran two of the social media websites instead of just one.
10. How we completed our tasks throughout the 
day: Who did what? How it worked out? 
We didn’t religiously stick to any specific tasks. We swapped roles when filming and 
interviewing, to ensure we each participated equally, and to give everyone in the 
group a chance at gaining or enhancing our skills 
11. Digital tools, software and equipment we used. 
Digital tools – Twitter, Instagram, Thinglink, Bambuser, Youtube, Nikon cameras, 
Weebly, iPhones, iPads, One Drive Photoshop 
12. How we identified people to interview. 
We decided beforehand that we wanted to interview a range of different aged 
individuals. We approached a family, a teenage boy and an old lady that seemed 
friendly and willing to speak to us.
13. People we interviewed: 
How many? Who? Why? Their perspective? 
Estelle James, who gave us an insight into the educational importance of the event. 
Emmanuel Batista, who gave us a teenager’s point of view 
Christine Farebrother, who felt the event was of great importance 
14. How we identified what to film (locations etc). 
The three of us decided on what to do by grouping together once we had arrived 
and thought ‘what can we film?’ we decided to take it in turns to get a range of 
people, old and young to interview. 
15. Our website: 
Design, sections and links to social media. 
We chose the layout as we believed it looked professional an similar to a 
newspaper. We decided to choose a theme that showcase a header picture 
immediately when you click on the website. The pages we included were: the 
Tower of London/War and Friendship including two reviews on the home page, an 
"about" page detailing about the event and us, a photo an video gallery page. 
Another page we created was a history page of the First World War and brief 
educational ideas. The final page we decided was a "coverage" page of what we 
had recorded an reported. This included vines, audio interviews, life footage and 
social media feeds.
16. Did we publicise our site via social media and 
get any traffic? If so, how? 
We added the live Twitter feed and the Instagram feed onto our website, to act as 
a gateway between the sites. We tweeted about the website from our twitter 
accounts throughout the process,and also posted links to the site from our 
personal social media websites like Twitter and Facebook. We received over 250 
page hits from one weekend alone. 
17. The multimedia we produced individually. 
Lucy – Instagram account, Thinglink, Bambuser, Youtube, Soundcloud and Vine. 
Lauren – Twitter account, Bambuser, Youtube, Soundcloud and Vine. Anastasia – 
Facebook page, Bambuser, Audioboom, Youtube, Soundcloud and Vine. 
18. The text we produced individually. 
Lauren - War and Friendship review, About the Tower of London and About myself 
Lucy - Tower of London review and About me 
Anastasia - About the talk, About me, History and education and the interview 
briefing 
http://theseaofred.weebly.com/
19. The photos we took individually. 
We all took a lot of photographs throughout the event, but decided to choose a 
select few to include on the website. We each have our own slideshow with 8-10 
images, and we ensured that none of our photos were too similar, to avoid 
repetition for the page viewer 
20. Who we interviewed individually. 
Lucy – Emanuel Batista, Lauren – Christine Farebrother, Anastasia – Estelle James 
and Andy Merry 
21. Individually, the tasks completed towards the 
assignment. Before the event and during. 
As we have stated throughout the presentation we equally shared the roles so that 
each of us were doing the same amount of work to make the group assignment 
fair. We all took photos, interviewed, recorded videos and wrote pieces for the 
assignment.
22. Did the assignment go according to plan? 
The assignment went according to plan. We had a basic structure and an idea of 
the outcome we wanted, but because nothing was set in stone, it allowed us 
flexibility to capture as much multimedia as we could, resulting in us being able to 
choose the best from what we had. 
23. Three things that work well in our assignment. 
1) The event was a success 
2) The building of the website was great fun and we learnt a lot. 
3) We (the three of us) worked really well as a team, because we worked on 
our strengths and weaknesses. 
24. Three things we found difficult about this 
assignment. 
1) Getting quotes on paper and phones when it was raining 
2) Not being able to record in the talk 
3) Lack of signal in the Tower of London made it harder to live tweet
25. Three ways we could improve this assignment. 
Some videos we were unable to film them correctly and horizontally. However in 
the editing process, we could’ve attempted to edit the videos to be horizontal. 
We could’ve interviewed more people, to gain a wider perspective and opinion on 
the event. 
In the early stages of the process, we went with Wordpress, but due to technical 
difficulties around embedding, we changed to Weebly. The theme we chose only 
allowed us to have five pages – so we could’ve spent longer looking for a theme 
that would allow us to develop more pages if required 
26. Three things we have learned by doing this 
assignment. 
1) We shouldn’t give up when it gets hard, just find a different platform 
2) Embedding 
3) Being on camera isn’t that horrible, if you want to get strangers on camera 
you have to be comfortable on it too. 
27. The skills we need to learn and improve on, to 
produce a more successful multimedia website. 
1) Embedding things into the website, took us a whole to figure it out and took a 
lot of googling. 
2) Publish the website earlier in an attempt to drive more traffic 
3) Practice more with using the apps in spare time to avoid trouble trying to get 
things to work on the day
Thank you for listening.

More Related Content

Similar to Assessment tower of london presentation final

Group presentation kotryna, mychael, magnhild
Group presentation kotryna, mychael, magnhildGroup presentation kotryna, mychael, magnhild
Group presentation kotryna, mychael, magnhildKotrynaB
 
Evaluation question 1
Evaluation question 1 Evaluation question 1
Evaluation question 1 mag_anna
 
Ppt question 4.
Ppt question 4.Ppt question 4.
Ppt question 4.Parkin6
 
Ppt question 4.
Ppt question 4.Ppt question 4.
Ppt question 4.Parkin6
 
Group presentation
Group presentationGroup presentation
Group presentationmagnhildf
 
Digital Journalism - Baluchistan Protest - Sabian, Ameet and Nathaniel
Digital Journalism - Baluchistan Protest - Sabian, Ameet and NathanielDigital Journalism - Baluchistan Protest - Sabian, Ameet and Nathaniel
Digital Journalism - Baluchistan Protest - Sabian, Ameet and NathanielNathanielDurman
 
Baluchistan protest multimedia webpage
Baluchistan protest multimedia webpageBaluchistan protest multimedia webpage
Baluchistan protest multimedia webpageNathanielDurman
 
PP1 - Project Presentation (TAKEN)
PP1 - Project Presentation (TAKEN)PP1 - Project Presentation (TAKEN)
PP1 - Project Presentation (TAKEN)s3314783
 
Evaluation 1,2 & 3
Evaluation 1,2 & 3Evaluation 1,2 & 3
Evaluation 1,2 & 3Amirah Yasar
 
Documentary process so far
Documentary process so farDocumentary process so far
Documentary process so farlshepherd27
 
Documentary process so far
Documentary process so farDocumentary process so far
Documentary process so farlshepherd27
 
Documentary process so far
Documentary process so farDocumentary process so far
Documentary process so farlshepherd27
 
Documentary process so far
Documentary process so farDocumentary process so far
Documentary process so farlshepherd27
 
Weekly overview production_schedule
Weekly overview production_scheduleWeekly overview production_schedule
Weekly overview production_scheduleamar khan
 
Final production evaluation
Final production evaluationFinal production evaluation
Final production evaluationcecefh
 
Evaluation question 4
Evaluation question 4Evaluation question 4
Evaluation question 4joniah
 

Similar to Assessment tower of london presentation final (20)

Group presentation kotryna, mychael, magnhild
Group presentation kotryna, mychael, magnhildGroup presentation kotryna, mychael, magnhild
Group presentation kotryna, mychael, magnhild
 
Group presentation
Group presentationGroup presentation
Group presentation
 
Evaluation question 1
Evaluation question 1 Evaluation question 1
Evaluation question 1
 
Question 1
Question 1Question 1
Question 1
 
q4
q4q4
q4
 
Ppt question 4.
Ppt question 4.Ppt question 4.
Ppt question 4.
 
Ppt question 4.
Ppt question 4.Ppt question 4.
Ppt question 4.
 
Group presentation
Group presentationGroup presentation
Group presentation
 
Digital Journalism - Baluchistan Protest - Sabian, Ameet and Nathaniel
Digital Journalism - Baluchistan Protest - Sabian, Ameet and NathanielDigital Journalism - Baluchistan Protest - Sabian, Ameet and Nathaniel
Digital Journalism - Baluchistan Protest - Sabian, Ameet and Nathaniel
 
Baluchistan protest multimedia webpage
Baluchistan protest multimedia webpageBaluchistan protest multimedia webpage
Baluchistan protest multimedia webpage
 
PP1 - Project Presentation (TAKEN)
PP1 - Project Presentation (TAKEN)PP1 - Project Presentation (TAKEN)
PP1 - Project Presentation (TAKEN)
 
Evaluation 1,2 & 3
Evaluation 1,2 & 3Evaluation 1,2 & 3
Evaluation 1,2 & 3
 
Documentary process so far
Documentary process so farDocumentary process so far
Documentary process so far
 
Documentary process so far
Documentary process so farDocumentary process so far
Documentary process so far
 
Documentary process so far
Documentary process so farDocumentary process so far
Documentary process so far
 
Documentary process so far
Documentary process so farDocumentary process so far
Documentary process so far
 
Weekly overview production_schedule
Weekly overview production_scheduleWeekly overview production_schedule
Weekly overview production_schedule
 
Final production evaluation
Final production evaluationFinal production evaluation
Final production evaluation
 
Evaluation question 4
Evaluation question 4Evaluation question 4
Evaluation question 4
 
Meeting 1
Meeting 1Meeting 1
Meeting 1
 

Assessment tower of london presentation final

  • 1. Anastasia, Lauren and Lucy Present… The Sea of Red – The Tower of London
  • 2. 1. What event did we choose? The Tower of London remembers WW1. 888,246 ceramic poppies were made, each to represent a soldier that died in support of Britain 2. Why did we choose it? We chose the event because it was current and it was a big news story as it has been 100 years since the start of WW1, it was so important to so many people and still is so important. 3. When did it happen? The War and Friendships talk we attended was on the 27th October and the day we attended the Tower of London was on the 29th October.
  • 3. 4. Research into the event beforehand. We did some background research on the First World War, and the adult talk we attended, featured guest speakers, so we did some background research on these individuals also 5. Planning the event. As we were the only group in the class to pick our own event we had to find our own news and background information. 6. Looking at other multimedia websites for ideas, and what we learnt. Originally we were doing a Wordpress site so we looked at the example from last year (damedash2013) to try and get inspiration for layouts. Because we chose weebly in the end we just thought of our own ideas.
  • 4. 7. How we organised the team. We allocated roles at the start of the process to help us have a starting point: Anastasia: Web Editor - Lucy: Multimedia Editor - Lauren:Social Media Editor We stuck to this plan, but as time went by and we got used to the multimedia tools and our website, we all got more involved with the different roles. 8. What we did first when we got to the event. When we first got there we sourced the best places for interviews, photographs and videos. We did this both inside and out of the tower. 9. How we organised ourselves with regards to allocating roles and tasks. Originally we chose three key roles - web editor (Anastasia) social media editor (Lauren) and multimedia editor (Lucy). Each of us had slightly more input on these chosen roles e.g I ran two of the social media websites instead of just one.
  • 5. 10. How we completed our tasks throughout the day: Who did what? How it worked out? We didn’t religiously stick to any specific tasks. We swapped roles when filming and interviewing, to ensure we each participated equally, and to give everyone in the group a chance at gaining or enhancing our skills 11. Digital tools, software and equipment we used. Digital tools – Twitter, Instagram, Thinglink, Bambuser, Youtube, Nikon cameras, Weebly, iPhones, iPads, One Drive Photoshop 12. How we identified people to interview. We decided beforehand that we wanted to interview a range of different aged individuals. We approached a family, a teenage boy and an old lady that seemed friendly and willing to speak to us.
  • 6. 13. People we interviewed: How many? Who? Why? Their perspective? Estelle James, who gave us an insight into the educational importance of the event. Emmanuel Batista, who gave us a teenager’s point of view Christine Farebrother, who felt the event was of great importance 14. How we identified what to film (locations etc). The three of us decided on what to do by grouping together once we had arrived and thought ‘what can we film?’ we decided to take it in turns to get a range of people, old and young to interview. 15. Our website: Design, sections and links to social media. We chose the layout as we believed it looked professional an similar to a newspaper. We decided to choose a theme that showcase a header picture immediately when you click on the website. The pages we included were: the Tower of London/War and Friendship including two reviews on the home page, an "about" page detailing about the event and us, a photo an video gallery page. Another page we created was a history page of the First World War and brief educational ideas. The final page we decided was a "coverage" page of what we had recorded an reported. This included vines, audio interviews, life footage and social media feeds.
  • 7. 16. Did we publicise our site via social media and get any traffic? If so, how? We added the live Twitter feed and the Instagram feed onto our website, to act as a gateway between the sites. We tweeted about the website from our twitter accounts throughout the process,and also posted links to the site from our personal social media websites like Twitter and Facebook. We received over 250 page hits from one weekend alone. 17. The multimedia we produced individually. Lucy – Instagram account, Thinglink, Bambuser, Youtube, Soundcloud and Vine. Lauren – Twitter account, Bambuser, Youtube, Soundcloud and Vine. Anastasia – Facebook page, Bambuser, Audioboom, Youtube, Soundcloud and Vine. 18. The text we produced individually. Lauren - War and Friendship review, About the Tower of London and About myself Lucy - Tower of London review and About me Anastasia - About the talk, About me, History and education and the interview briefing http://theseaofred.weebly.com/
  • 8. 19. The photos we took individually. We all took a lot of photographs throughout the event, but decided to choose a select few to include on the website. We each have our own slideshow with 8-10 images, and we ensured that none of our photos were too similar, to avoid repetition for the page viewer 20. Who we interviewed individually. Lucy – Emanuel Batista, Lauren – Christine Farebrother, Anastasia – Estelle James and Andy Merry 21. Individually, the tasks completed towards the assignment. Before the event and during. As we have stated throughout the presentation we equally shared the roles so that each of us were doing the same amount of work to make the group assignment fair. We all took photos, interviewed, recorded videos and wrote pieces for the assignment.
  • 9. 22. Did the assignment go according to plan? The assignment went according to plan. We had a basic structure and an idea of the outcome we wanted, but because nothing was set in stone, it allowed us flexibility to capture as much multimedia as we could, resulting in us being able to choose the best from what we had. 23. Three things that work well in our assignment. 1) The event was a success 2) The building of the website was great fun and we learnt a lot. 3) We (the three of us) worked really well as a team, because we worked on our strengths and weaknesses. 24. Three things we found difficult about this assignment. 1) Getting quotes on paper and phones when it was raining 2) Not being able to record in the talk 3) Lack of signal in the Tower of London made it harder to live tweet
  • 10. 25. Three ways we could improve this assignment. Some videos we were unable to film them correctly and horizontally. However in the editing process, we could’ve attempted to edit the videos to be horizontal. We could’ve interviewed more people, to gain a wider perspective and opinion on the event. In the early stages of the process, we went with Wordpress, but due to technical difficulties around embedding, we changed to Weebly. The theme we chose only allowed us to have five pages – so we could’ve spent longer looking for a theme that would allow us to develop more pages if required 26. Three things we have learned by doing this assignment. 1) We shouldn’t give up when it gets hard, just find a different platform 2) Embedding 3) Being on camera isn’t that horrible, if you want to get strangers on camera you have to be comfortable on it too. 27. The skills we need to learn and improve on, to produce a more successful multimedia website. 1) Embedding things into the website, took us a whole to figure it out and took a lot of googling. 2) Publish the website earlier in an attempt to drive more traffic 3) Practice more with using the apps in spare time to avoid trouble trying to get things to work on the day
  • 11. Thank you for listening.