introduction to Crim

1. 1
Outcomes – Based Teaching and Learning Plan in
Course Title Introduction to Criminology Course Code CRIM 1
Credit Units 3 Course Pre/Co-
requisites
None
Course Description This course provides the basic understanding of a theory, its development and application to the etiology of crime, its use to understanding
human, criminal and deviant behaviors. It includes the historical evolution of criminology, the different school of thoughts, the process
ofmeasuring crime, as it relates to criminological research, the divisions and scope of criminology, and the justice system. This course would also
introducecriminology as a profession in the Philippines.
Program Intended Learning
Outcomes (PILO)
At the end of this course, graduates will have the ability to:
A. Conduct criminological research on crimes, crime causation, victims and offenders to include deviant behavior.
B. Internalize the concepts of human rights and victims welfare.
C. Demonstrate competence and broad understanding in law enforcement administration, public safety and criminal justice.
D. Utilize criminalistics or forensic science in the investigation and detection of crime.
E. Apply the principles and jurisprudence of criminal law, evidence and criminal procedure.
F. Ensure offenders’ welfare and development for their re – integration to the community.
Courses Intended Learning
Outcomes (CILO)
At the end of this course, the students should be able to:
1. Analyze the concept and nature of criminology, crime, law and the historical evolution of criminology.
2. Explain the construction of criminological theory.
3. Describe the concept of crime, law and criminal behavior; measuring crime, victims and offender, punishment, sentencing, and
rehabilitation.
4. Examine the interactive nature between criminology and criminal justice system, criminology as a profession in the Philippines and
INTRODUCTION TO CRIMINOLOGY
COLEGIO de KAPATAGAN
DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINOLOGY
BACHELOR OF SCIENCE IN CRIMINOLOGY (BS
CRIM)
CORE VALUES AND/OR TAGLINE

2. 2
different branch of criminology.
5. Articulate the current issues and studies in criminology.
MIDTERM ESSENTIAL LEARNING Intended Learning
Outcome
(ILO)
Suggested
Teaching/Learning
Activities (TLAs)
Assessment Task
(ATs)
Week Content Standard Declarative Knowledge Functional Knowledge
1 – 4 Demonstrate
understanding of:
1. Concepts of
Criminology
A. Concept and Nature of
Criminology
1. Concept of Criminology,
Crime, and Law.
1.1. Classical definition of
criminology
1.2. Legal and
criminological
definition of crime
and law.
2. Evolution/History of School
of Thought in Criminology
2.1. Classical Theory
2.2. Neo – classical theory
2.3. Positivist theory
1. Describing the
Concept of
criminology
1. Explain the General
Concepts of Criminal
Law
Interactive Lecture Paper and Pencil
5– 10 Demonstrate
understanding of:
1. Nature and
Extent of
Criminolog
y
A. Scope/Nature and Extent of
Criminology
1. Branches of Criminology
1.1. Sociology of law
1.2. Etiology of crimes
1.3. Penology
1.4. Victimology
1.5. Forensic psycholgy
1.6. Antrophoogical
1. Describing the
scope/nature and extent
of criminology
1. Explain the scope/nature
and extent of criminology Interactive Lecture Paper and Pencil

3. 3
criminology
1.7. Forensic Science
2. Studies related to
Criminology
2.4. Criminology as a
Science
2.5. As an applied science
2.6. As a social science
2.7. As a dynamic
2.8. As a nationalistic
2.9. As a transnational
3. Employment opportunities for
Criminologists
FINAL
11-16
Demonstrate
competencies in:
1. Nature and
Views of
Criminologist
s of crime and
Criminal
A. Nature of Crime
1. Anatomy of crime
1.1. Desire or intent
1.2. Opportunity
1.3. Capability
2. Crime in distinction to Sin,
Morality, and Deliquency
3. Criminological and Legal
classification of crimes
B. Methods Applied by
Criminologist in Studying
Crime
1. Survey research
2. Cohort research
3. Aggregate research
4. Experimental research
5. Observational and interview
Research
6. Measuring crime
6.1. Uniform Crime
1. Discussing the
Nature of crime.
2. Describing the
methods applied by
criminologist in
studying the crime.
1. Illustrate the Nature of
crime.
2. Explain the methods
applied by criminologist
in studygin the crime.
1. Interactive Lecture
2. Searching in the
web
Case Study

4. 4
Report (UCR)
6.2. National Crime
Victimization
Survey (NCVS)
6.3. Self – Report
Survey
7. Crime Causation
7.1. Psychological
7.2. Sociological
7.3. Biological
7.4. Other causative
factors of crime
7.4.1. Need frustration
7.4.2. Internal
inhibition
7.4.3. External
inhibition
7.4.4. Contact with
reality
7.4.5. Situational crime
report
7.4.6. Alcoholism
7.4.7. Drug addiction
8. Contributory factors of
crime causation
C. The Nature of Criminal
1. Definition of criminal
1.1. Criminological
1.2. Legal
2. Classificaiton of criminal
2.1. Etiological
2.2. Behaioural system
2.3. Activities
2.4. Mental activities
3. Types of offenders who live
in the non- criminal world
3. Discussing the
nature of criminal

5. 5
17-18 Demonstrate
competencies in:
1. Current
issues and
studies in
criminology
A. Criminology and Criminal
Justice System
B. Criminology as a Profession in
the Philippines
1. R.A 6506
2. Related Bill
professionalizing the
practice of Criminology in
the Philippines
C. Global Criminology
D. Green/Enviromental
Criminology
E. Newsmaking Criminology
F. Peacemaking Criminology
1. Discussing the
Current issues and
studies in
criminology
1. Determine the Current
issues and studies in
criminology.
1. Interactive Lecture
2. Searching in the
web
Research
Assignment
Basic Readings
1. Eduardo (2018). Essentials of Criminology 2nd Ed. (OBE Compliant). Published by WISEMAN Trading.
2. Gupta (2019). Fundamentals of Criminology. Distributed by WISEMAN Trading.
3. Sharma (2019). Sociological Theory of Crime & Criminology. Distributed by WISEMAN Trading.
Extended Readings
1. Comparing cultures, comparing crime: Challenges, prospects and problems for a global criminology. Accessed at
https://link.springer.com/article/10.1023/A:1012223323445. Google.Scholar
2. Global Criminology. Accessed at https://www.uu.nl/masters/en/global-criminology
3. Global Criminology. Accessed at http://docshare01.docshare.tips/files/19675/196759251.pdf
4. Green and Environmental Criminology. Accessed at https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118517390.wbetc027
Course Assessment
1. Paper and Pencil
2. Case Study
3. Research Assignment
Course Assessment
Rubrics
Case Study Grading Rubric
CRITERIA
Content % Below Standard Approaching Standard At Standard Exceeds Standard

6. 6
Clear explanation of key
strategic issues
 The problems, scope, and
seriousness was clearly
identified in the
discussions.
 There was a well focused
diagnosis of strategic
issues and key problems
that demonstrated a good
grasp of the company’s
present situation and
strategic issues.
 Effective Executive
Summary
 Did not waste space
summarizing information
already found in the case.
20% Shows little
understanding of the
issues, key problems,
and the company’s
present situation and
strategic issues.
Executive summary
missing or poorly
constructed
Shows some understanding of
the issues, key problems, and
the company’s present
situation and strategic issues.
Executive summary
inadequate
Shows adequate knowledge of
the issues, key problems, and
the company’s present situation
and strategic issues.
Executive summary adequate
Shows superior
knowledge of the
issues, key problems,
and the company’s
present situation and
strategic issues.
Effective Executive
Summary
Valid arguments; analysis of
financial performance with
relevant supportive detail.
 Logically organized, key
points, key arguments, and
important criteria for
evaluating business
strategies were easily
identified
 Critical issues and key
problems that supported
the Case Analysis were
identified and clearly
analyzed and supported.
20% Critical issues and key
problems that
supported the Case
Analysis were poorly
identified, analyzed,
and supported.
Critical issues and key
problems that supported the
Case Analysis were not clearly
identified, analyzed, and
supported.
Critical issues and key problems
that supported the Case
Analysis were partially
identified, analyzed, and
supported.
Critical issues and
key problems that
supported the Case
Analysis were clearly
identified, analyzed,
and supported.
Appropriate analysis,
evaluation, synthesis for the
specific industry identified
 There was complete data
on which to base a
thorough analysis
 Key change drivers
underlying the issues were
identified.
 Synthesis, analysis, and
evaluations were clearly
20% Analysis of key change
drivers and the
underlying the issues
inadequate.
Analysis of key change
drivers and the underlying the
issues were not identified.
Analysis of key change drivers
and the underlying the issues
were partially identified
Analysis of key
change drivers and
the underlying the
issues were clearly
identified

7. 7
presented and supported in
a literate and effective
manner.
Conclusions and
recommendations are
congruent with strategic
analysis:
 Specific recommendations
and/or plans of action
provided.
 Specific data or facts were
referred to when necessary
to support the analysis and
conclusions.
 Recommendations and
conclusions were presented
and supported in a literate
and effective manner.
20% Effective
recommendations
and/or plans of action
not provided.
Specific data or facts
necessary to support
the analysis and
conclusions was not
provided.
Effective recommendations
and/or plans of action
inadequate.
Specific data or facts were not
referred when necessary to
support the analysis and
conclusions.
Effective recommendations
and/or plans of action were
partially provided.
Specific data or facts were
occasionally referred when
necessary to support the
analysis and conclusions.
Effective
recommendations,
solutions, and/or
plans of action were
provided.
Specific data or facts
were referred when
necessary to support
the analysis and
conclusions.
Proper organization,
professional writing, and
logical flow of analysis. APA
formatting
 Logically organized, key
points, key arguments, and
important criteria for
evaluating the business
logic easily identified.
 Key points were supported
with a well thought out
rationale based on applying
specific concepts or
analytical frameworks to
the data provided in the
case.
 Proper grammar, spelling,
punctuation, 3rd
person
objective view,
professional writing, and
syntax.
20% Key points were poorly
identified and
supported with a well
thought out rationale
based on applying
specific concepts or
analytical frameworks
to the data provided in
the case.
Grammar, spelling,
punctuation,
professional writing,
and syntax needs
significant
improvement
Key points were not identified
and supported with a well
thought out rationale based on
applying specific concepts or
analytical frameworks to the
data provided in the case.
Grammar, spelling,
punctuation, professional
writing, and syntax needs
improvement
Key points were partially
identified and supported with a
well thought out rationale based
on applying specific concepts or
analytical frameworks to the
data provided in the case.
Adequate grammar, spelling,
punctuation, professional
writing, and syntax
Key points were
clearly identified and
supported with a well
thought out rationale
based on applying
specific concepts or
analytical
frameworks to the
data provided in the
case.
Excellent grammar,
spelling, punctuation,
professional writing,
and syntax
Percentage Scale:
0.00 – 57.49% 76.25 - 93.74%
57.50 – 76.24% 93.75 - 100%

8. 8
RESEARCH ASSIGNMENT GRADING RUBRIC (OUT OF 100 POINTS)
CATEGORY 15 points 11 points 7 points 3 points TOTAL
SCORE
Introduction Exceptional introduction
that grabs interest of
reader and states topic.
Thesis is exceptionally
clear, well-developed,
and a definitive
statement.
Proficient introduction that is
interesting and states topic.
thesis is clear and arguable
statement of position.
basic introduction that states
topic but lacks interest.
thesis is somewhat clear and
arguable.
Weak or no introduction
of topic. Paper’s purpose
is unclear/thesis is weak
or missing.
Content
knowledge:
Quality of
Research
Paper is exceptionally
researched, contains 3
peer reviewed articles,
the 3 articles relate to the
thesis argument in a
logical manner.
References are correctly
cited
Information relates to the main
topic.
Paper, is well-researched in
detail and from 3 good
sources. References are
correctly cited
Information relates to the
main topic, but few details
and/or examples are given.
Shows a limited variety of
sources. References are not
cited correctly
Information has little or
nothing to do with the
thesis.
information has weak or
no connection to the
thesis. References are not
cited correctly.
Content
application:
Support of Thesis
and Analysis
Exceptionally critical,
relevant and consistent
connections made
between evidence and
thesis.
excellent analysis.
Consistent connections made
between evidence and thesis
good analysis.
Some connections made
between evidence and thesis.
some analysis.
Limited or no
connections made
between evidence and
thesis.
lack of analysis.
Conclusion Excellent summary of
thesis argument with
concluding ideas that
impact reader.
introduces no new
information.
Good summary of topic with
clear concluding ideas.
introduces no new
information.
Basic summary of topic with
some final concluding ideas.
introduces no new
information.
Lack of summary of
topic.
Writing Writing is clear and
relevant, with no
grammatical and/or
spelling errors – polished
and professional.
Reference section
properly formatted.
Most ideas are stated clearly
and are related to the topic,
with only minor grammatical
and/or spelling errors.
Reference section adequate.
Many ideas require
clarification and/or are off-
topic or have marginal
relevance to the assignment.
Many grammatical and/or
spellings errors throughout
the paper. The paper is very
challenging to read due to
poor writing flow. Improper
reference section.
Paper does not meet the
criteria for the
assignment (too short or
incomplete, too long,
and/or completely off-
topic). Reference section
missing.
Course Policies

9. 9
Consultations Schedule Faculty Member:
Contact Number:
Email Address:
Consultation Hours:
Time and Venue:
Course Title A.Y. Term of
Effectivity
Prepared by Approved by Page/s
Introduction to
Criminology
2019 – 2020 MARK LESTER M. FLORES, MSCJ
Program Head
FEMALYN M. TELERON
School Administrator
1- 9

10. 10