1. 1 cent fb clicks
Thorough details on 1 cent fb clicks review can be discovered at main website.
External evidence
Ephesians had been in wide circulation from the early days and its authenticity does not
seem to be questioned. From all indications "it was recognized by Marcion (as the letter to
the Laodiceans) it is the Marcion (as the letter to the Laodiceans) it is in the Muratorian
Canon and was used by heretics as effectively as the orthodox. No one particular would
seem to have queried Pauline authorship" (Carson, Moo and Morris 1992, 306).
Conclusion
To echo my thesis statement in the introduction, I endorse the argument that "from all this,
we conclude that there are no insurmountable hurdles to the traditional check out of the
Pauline authorship of this Epistle" (Theissen 1955, 241). In other words and phrases, "when
all the objections are very carefully regarded as it will be seen that the weight of proof is
inadequate to overthrow the overwhelming attestation to Pauline authorship, and the
Epistle's personal claims" (Guthrie 1965, 507). Bruce (1961) logically defends Pauline
authorship in an oblique but forceful argument:
If Epistle of the Ephesians was not written straight by Paul, but by one of his disciples in the
Apostle's identify, then its author was the biggest Paulinist of all time - a disciple who
assimilated
his master's imagined more totally than anyone else at any time did. The man who could
compose
Ephesians must have been the Apostle's equal, if not his superior, in mental stature and non
secular perception (11).
In spite of the simple fact that pseudonymity is regarded in modern day scholarship to have
been an proven exercise among the early Christians, the advocates of the conventional look
at (the researcher incorporated) are entitled to emphasize the self-testimony of the Epistle as
supportive proof for their position "until some satisfactory clarification is identified which
accounts for the universal acceptance of the Epistle at its confront value" (Guthrie 1965,
507).
Summary:
Barnett, A.E. 1946. The New Testomony: Its Generating and Which means.
New York: Abington-Cokesbury Push.
Barth, M. 1974. Ephesians.

2. New York: Doubleday.
Carson, D.A., Douglas J. Moo and Leon Morris. 1992. An Introduction to the New
Testomony.
Grand Rapids, Michigan: Zondervan Publishing Residence.
Chamberlain, R.B. and H. Feldman. 1950. The Dartmouth Bible.
Boston: Hougton Mifflin Co.
Gabel, J.B., C.B. Wheeler and A.D. York. 1996. The Bible as Literature: An Introduction. third
ed.
New York: Oxford University Press.
Gundry, R.H. 1981. A Survey of the New Testomony.
Grand Rapids, Michigan: Zondervan Publishing House.
Guthrie, Donald. 1965. New Testament Introduction.
Downers Grove, Illinois: Inter-Varsity Press.
Keeping, J.P. 2003. Wrote Wrote Ephesians?" Obtainable [On-line]:
[http://www.tektonics.org/ephauth.html]. twentieth August 2003.
McCain, D. 1996. Notes on New Testament Introduction.
Jos: African Textbooks.
Miller, M.S. and J.L. Miller. 1973. Harper's Bible Dictionary.
New York: Harper and Row Publishers.
Rhein, F.B. 1974. Understanding to the New Testomony.
Grand Rapids, Michigan: Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Home.
Turner, M. 1984. Ephesians. In New Bible Commentary. 21st century ed., 1222-12244.

3. Leicester: Inter Varsity Push.
Wallace, D.B. 2003. Ephesians:Introduction, Argument and Outline.
Accessible [On the internet]: http://www.bible.org/docs/soapbox/ephotl.htm.