This document provides a summary of an analysis of discount trends for maintenance services conducted from 2013 to 2015. The analysis focused on the top three revenue generating product families. The methodology involved collecting data from various sources, cleaning and filtering the data, then segmenting and analyzing the data based on factors like product family, service level, territory, industry, and type of sale. Metrics like average and median discount percentages were used along with tools like Excel, Tableau and Rapid Miner. Correlation, regression and conjoint analysis methods were explored to understand relationships between variables and the influence of attributes on discount levels. Recommendations were developed for key stakeholders based on the findings.
2. Analyze the trends &
variances of discount
for higher revenue
generating products &
services
Evaluate opportunities
to improve our pricing
model by leveraging
the discount analysis
To explore new
opportunities &
provide useful
recommendations to
key stakeholders if
current guidelines are
not optimal
3. Scope
Data collected for three years ranging from 2013 to 2015
Assessment for discount trend of products was limited to top three revenue
generating products families i.e. MX, EX & SRX
Data fields categorized as “Not assigned” were not included in the analysis after
careful consideration on various parameters
Most of the analysis comprised of both Capped & Non-Capped accounts as a whole but
the Recommendations phase reflected a fragmentation between these two types of
accounts
4. Methodology
Metrics &
Tools Used
• Average of discount percentages for fair representation of data
• Median of discount percentages to avoid the sensitivity towards
outliers
• Tools: MS-Excel (Pivot tables, v-look up, conditional formulas),
Tableau and Rapid Miner
Data
Collection
• Data on required fields collected as required
• Data extracted from various platforms like SharePoint, legacy ERP
and SAP BI
Challenges Solution
Attaining data for the year 2013 due to its
unavailability in new ERP system
Inconsistency of data fields among 2013 and 2014-
2015 information
Data moved in several parts
The data fields matched with one another and extra
information was removed
Limitation of MS-excel to manage large volume of
data
The data was split into several parts using EZ-split
software
5. Cleansing, Filtering & Validating the Data
Cleansing/ Scrubbing
• Similar information
erased to avoid duplicity
• “Not assigned” values for
Region data values were
optimized
• Identification of Software
SKUs
• Corrections in discount %
performed
• Conditional formatting of
data values
Filtering
• According to attached
product families*
• According to service
levels*
• * Validation from financial
dashboard
Validating
• List price
• Net price
• SKUs consisting of “cfts”
or “custom”
• Old & Obsolete SKUs
Data anomalies was filtered from the data post applying these conditions
6. Factors of Segmentation
By Product Families
- MX
- EX
- SRX
By Service Levels
- Core
- Core Plus
- Next day & Next day onsite
- Same day & Same day onsite
By Territory
- AMER
- APAC
- EMEA
By Industry
- Service Provider
- Enterprise
By Information System
- Hardware
- Software
By Type of Sale
- Partner
- Direct
By Type of
Contract/Agreement
- New
- Renewed
By Volume of Deals
7. Methods Exploration for Conducting Analysis
Correlation & Regression Modeling to know the relationship among variables individually
Conjoint Analysis to explore the influence of various attributes on discount
Performing manual output framing choosing possible combinations of factors as a bundle
#4: A major portion was attempted to fill the non-assigned data fields based upon SKU’s, sales region, theater etc. But last part of this section was not included after checking its weightage on total data by comparing it with achievement net, quantity etc.
Cleansing/ Scrubbing the Data
Data fields having similar information was removed to avoid duplicity
“Not assigned” data values was optimized on a certain level based upon the information in hand and the remaining was not included
Discount percentages calculations were corrected before moving with the analysis
Conditional formatting of various data values was performed to ensure coherence
Data was filtered to include attached product families of MX, EX & SRX based upon revenue generation* (Legacy products inclusive)
Further filtering was done to include maintenance services only such as Core, Core Plus, Next day, Next day onsite, Same day, Same day onsite*
Validating the Data:
After due diligence, some outliers and data anomalies were detected and following validating checks were performed to enable useful analysis-
List price outside the range of -10 and 10 should be eliminated
Net price should be greater than list price
SKU’s consisting of items such as “custom” or “cfts” should not be considered
The Old or obsolete product SKUs were removed from the data post comparing it with the current SKUs