Successfully reported this slideshow.
We use your LinkedIn profile and activity data to personalize ads and to show you more relevant ads. You can change your ad preferences anytime.

Cross tested plans - how-to & examples

1,140 views

Published on

cross tested plans

Published in: Economy & Finance
  • Be the first to like this

Cross tested plans - how-to & examples

  1. 1. Cross-Tested Plans James A . van I waarden, F S A , E A Con s u l t i ng A c t u a r y Van I wa a rde n A s s o c i a tes Minneapo l is, MN ISCEBS Sympo s ium, B o s ton Sep tember 2 5 , 2 013
  2. 2. Today’s Menu y What are cross-tested plans? y History y Cross-testing “recipe” y Plan designs y Other uses y What works, what to avoid y How to use cross-tested plans with 401(k)’s
  3. 3. What are Cross-Tested Plans? y Plans that don’t fit into IRS pre-approved designs y Or...a group of non-identical plans y Show nondiscrimination by converting contributions into benefits (cross) and testing the benefits (testing!)
  4. 4. History of Cross-Testing – Part I §401(a)(4) •...benefits or contributions do not discriminate in favor of HCEs... RR 81- 202 •comparability of plans 410(b) & 401(a)(4) regs •200+ pages, early 1990’s
  5. 5. History of Cross-Testing – Part II New Comparability •a.k.a. class allocation plans, based on the new regulations Threats to outlaw • led to “gateways” effective 2002 Stable for 10+ years •now, even prototype plans include class allocation option
  6. 6. Cross-Testing “Recipe” for DC Plans Step 1: pass thru any of three “gateways” Go! Broadly available allocation rates Gradual age or service schedule Minimum alloc rate: 5% or 1/3 top HCE
  7. 7. Cross-Testing “Recipe” for DC Plans y Step 2: prepare the ingredients @ 8½% interest Contribution for each ee To age 65 ÷ annuity factor (we’ll use 10) to get annual benefit ÷ pay = accrual rate
  8. 8. Cross-Testing “Recipe” for DC Plans y Step 3: mix it all together There’s a rate group for each HCE; it includes the HCE & everyone (HCE or NHCE) with a higher accrual rate: ees w/ rate >=HCE#1 HCE#1 Test each rate group to see if it passes the §410(b) coverage test: • 70% ratio percentage test, or • average benefit percentage test Ratio % below is 75% ÷ 50% = 150% %/HCEs 2/4=50% %/NHCEs 3/4=75%
  9. 9. Cross-Tested Plan Designs y Common designs include: { Age-weighted: guaranteed to pass { Service-weighted { Class allocation (aka “new comparability”) { DB/DC, usually cash balance & profit sharing { Examples for Dr. F & his faithful servants...
  10. 10. Cross-Tested Plan Designs y Age-weighted profit sharing plan { Always passes §401(a)(4) test, but not very flexible { Gateway is gradual age or service schedule { One rate group covers HCE (Dr. F) & both NHCEs, ratio % = 100% Age Service Pay PS % PS $ Benefit Accrual Rate Dr. Frankenstein 60 40 $255,000 20% $51,000 3.01% Igor 40 10 50,000 3.91% 1,955 3.01% Inga 30 5 30,000 3%* 900 5.22% * Age-weighted formula produces 1.73%, but 3% top-heavy minimum applies.
  11. 11. Cross-Tested Plan Designs y Service-weighted profit sharing plan { Rewards loyalty, not very common { PS in this example is ½% of pay per year of service { Gateway is gradual age or service schedule { One rate group covers HCE (Dr. F) & both NHCEs, ratio % = 100% Age Service Pay PS % PS $ Benefit Accrual Rate Dr. Frankenstein 60 40 $255,000 20% $51,000 3.01% Igor 40 10 50,000 5% 2,500 3.85% Inga 30 5 30,000 3%* 900 5.22% * Service-weighted formula produces 2.5%, but 3% top-heavy minimum applies.
  12. 12. Cross-Tested Plan Designs y Class allocation (aka “new comparability”) profit sharing { Very common, even prototype documents include this option { Gateway is minimum allocation 5% or 1/3 of highest HCE rate { One rate group covers HCE (Dr. F) & both NHCEs, ratio % = 100% Age Service Pay PS % PS $ Benefit Accrual Rate Dr. Frankenstein 60 40 $255,000 20% $51,000 3.01% Igor 40 10 50,000 5% 2,500 3.85% Inga 30 5 30,000 5% 1,500 8.69%
  13. 13. Cross-Tested Plan Designs y DB/DC combo: cash balance & profit sharing { Common for professional firms { Enables large deductible contributions for owners { Gateway here is 7½% DC; Igor & Inga get 3% cash balance credits { This example is for a PBGC-covered plan, Frankenstein Mfg. Inc. Ù A PBGC-exempt professional firm may need to limit DC er contrs to 6% Age Pay Cash Balance Credit PS & 3% Safe Harbor 401(k) & Catchup Total Dr. F’stein 60 $255,000 $230,000 $33,500 $23,000 $286,500 Igor 40 50,000 1,500 3,750 whatever 5,250+401k Inga 30 30,000 900 2,250 whatever 3,150+401k
  14. 14. Other Uses for Cross-Testing y Can structure retirement plans by business unit y Could be all DB, all DC or a combination y It’s a lifesaver for mergers & acquisitions
  15. 15. Other Uses for Cross-Testing y Case study: parent & acquisitions, 25,000 total ees DB/DC DB only DC only y Combine all the plans and test on a benefits basis y Can apply this for any group of non-identical plans
  16. 16. Cross-Testing – What Works, What to Avoid y What works great { Profit sharing / cash balance combination Ù PS projected at 8½% interest Ù Cash balance at interest crediting rate (usually much lower) Ù Better results than pure DB or pure DC Ù Effect is known as
  17. 17. Cross-Testing – What Works, What to Avoid y What works great { 401(k) 3% safe harbor { You get a triple dip Ù Free pass for ADP & ACP tests Ù Covers DC top-heavy requirement Ù Counts for cross-testing base & gateway { A few issues Ù Notice required >30 days before plan year starts Ù 100% vesting Ù Can’t impute “permitted disparity” (FICA recognition) for testing { Add profit sharing, if needed to meet gateway
  18. 18. Cross-Testing – What Works, What to Avoid y What to avoid { Unfavorable demographics Ù HCEs younger than others Ù Usually a solution, but it’s tricky { Inflexible plan designs Ù Contribution rates specified in plan document Ù Even prototypes now allow each participant in own class
  19. 19. Cross-Testing – What Works, What to Avoid y What to avoid { Failing the §401(a)(4) test! { Causes Ù Demographic changes, especially new young HCEs Ù Inflexible plan designs { Prevention Ù Test before contributing Ù Flexible plan designs { Cure Ù §1.401(a)(4)-11(g) corrective amendment Ù Can provide extra contributions for a targeted group of NHCEs Ù Must be done within 9½ months after end of year
  20. 20. Cross-Testing – What Works, What to Avoid y What to avoid { 401(k) matching contributions (even safe harbor) { Really? { Deferrals & match don’t count for 1st stage of §401(a)(4) test { You can still match, but it’s an extra expense { What can you do? Ù Convert match to 3% safe harbor, with advance notice Ù Add profit sharing for gateway & cross-testing base
  21. 21. Using Cross-Tested Plans with 401(k)’s y Get top people within deferral range of §415 DC maximum { In 2013, that’s $51,000 - $17,500 = $33,500 (13.14% of max pay) y Cover the gateway for NHCEs { If HCEs are at 13.14%, NHCEs need to be at 1/3 of that: 4.38% y Use 3% non-matching safe harbor { That leaves only 1.38% needed for NHCE profit sharing { Frees HCEs to maximize 401(k) deferrals y Still need to run the test { But gateway is often enough to pass 20% 15% 10% 5% 0% NHCE HCE Def PS SH
  22. 22. Take-Out Menu y Cross-testing is the most powerful testing tool there is! y You can structure plans to fit business needs y It makes some amazing plan designs possible

×