Recommended
More Related Content
Similar to 5 Biggest Challenges on Front Lines of Scholarly Publishing
Similar to 5 Biggest Challenges on Front Lines of Scholarly Publishing (20)
Recently uploaded
Recently uploaded (20)
5 Biggest Challenges on Front Lines of Scholarly Publishing
- 1. 5 BIGGEST CHALLENGES ON THE FRONT LINES OF SCHOLARLY PUBLISHING 1 © 2012 iParadigms LLC. Thursday, April 25, 2012 Webcast Start time: 8:30am San Francisco / 11:30am New York / 4:30pm London Twitter: #ethics2013
- 2. FEATURED SPEAKERS © 2012 iParadigms LLC. 2 Dr. Virginia Barbour Chair, Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE.org) Co-founding Editor, PLoS Medicine Journal Dr. David Moher University Research Chair, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute Editor-in-Chief, Systematic Reviews Journal Jason Chu Plagiarism.org (Moderator) #ethics2013
- 3. AGENDA © 2012 iParadigms LLC. 3 • POLLS • 5 BIGGEST CHALLENGES COUNTDOWN • PREVENTION & RESOURCES • Q&A • LINK TO SURVEY RESULTS REPORT #ethics2013
- 4. POLLS © 2012 iParadigms LLC. 4 1. WHAT IS YOUR ROLE? 1. WHAT DO YOU THINK IS THE BIGGEST CHALLENGE? #ethics2013
- 5. ABOUT THE SURVEY © 2012 iParadigms LLC. 5 • Goal: To learn more about the attitudes and experiences with ethical issues and other pressing issues • Identified 5 top concerns and challenges on the front lines of scholarly publishing • Based on responses from 120 people in an editorial role (editor/staff)
- 6. 5BIGGEST CHALLENGES © 2012 iParadigms LLC. 6 TOP 5 CHALLENGES COUNTDOWN #ethics2013
- 7. 5BIGGEST CHALLENGES © 2012 iParadigms LLC. 7 #5 TECHNOLOGICAL ADVANCES THAT SIMPLIFY IMAGE OR DATA FALSIFICATION ACCORDING TO THE SURVEY, “IMAGE DATA/FALSIFICATION” WAS DEEMED SERIOUS BY MORE THAN 1/3 OF RESPONDENTS. #ethics2013
- 8. 5BIGGEST CHALLENGES © 2012 iParadigms LLC. 8 EXAMPLE TEXT ON IMAGE MANIPULATION #ethics2013
- 9. 5BIGGEST CHALLENGES © 2012 iParadigms LLC. 9 #5 TECHNOLOGICAL ADVANCES THAT SIMPLIFY IMAGE OR DATA FALSIFICATION • SCIENCE IMAGE INTEGRITY •HTTP://SCIENCEIMAGEINTEGRITY.ORG •SEE “BEST PRACTICES IN MANAGING IMAGE DATA” • FANELLI D (2009) HOW MANY SCIENTISTS FABRICATE AND FALSIFY RESEARCH? A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META- ANALYSIS OF SURVEY DATA. PLOS ONE 4(5) . #ethics2013
- 10. 5 BIGGEST CHALLENGES © 2012 iParadigms LLC. 10 #4 CONFLICTS OF INTEREST BETWEEN RESEARCHERS AND INDUSTRY ACCORDING TO THE SURVEY, CLOSE TO 1/2 OF RESPONDENTS BELIEVE THAT “CONFLICTS OF INTEREST” WERE SERIOUS CHALLENGES. #ethics2013
- 11. 5 BIGGEST CHALLENGES © 2012 iParadigms LLC. 11 #4 CONFLICTS OF INTEREST BETWEEN RESEARCHERS AND INDUSTRY • LUNDH A, SISMONDO S, LEXCHIN J, BUSUIOC OA, BERO L. INDUSTRY SPONSORSHIP AND RESEARCH OUTCOME. COCHRANE DATABASE OF SYSTEMATIC REVIEWS 2012, ISSUE 12. ART. NO.: MR000033. • ROCHON PA, HOEY J, CHAN AW, FERRIS LE, LEXCHIN J, KALKAR SR, SEKERES M, WU W, VAN LAETHEM M, GRUNEIR M,MASKALYK J, STREINER DL, GOLD J, TABACK N, MOHER D. FINANCIAL CONFLICTS OF INTEREST CHECKLIST 2010 FOR CLINICAL RESEARCH STUDIES. OPEN MEDICINE 2010;4(1)E69 #ethics2013
- 13. 5 BIGGEST CHALLENGES © 2012 iParadigms LLC. 13 #3 POORLY DESIGNED STUDIES ACCORDING TO THE SURVEY, CLOSE TO 1/2 OF EDITORS BELIEVED THAT “POORLY DESIGNED STUDIES” WERE SERIOUS CHALLENGES. #ethics2013
- 15. 5 BIGGEST CHALLENGES © 2012 iParadigms LLC. 15 #3 POORLY DESIGNED STUDIES • CLINICAL RESEARCH IN OSTEOARTHRITIS OF THE KNEE -- 460 RANDOMISED CONTROLLED TRIALS IDENTIFIED • 82.6% DRUG TRIALS • FOCUS GROUPS WITH PATIENTS AND HEALTH PROFESSIONALS: -- LACK OF EVIDENCE / DEFICIT OF RESEARCH FOR: • PHYSIOTHERAPY, EXERCISE • ALTERNATIVE MEDICINE • INDICATIONS FOR JOINT REPLACEMENT #ethics2013
- 16. 5 BIGGEST CHALLENGES © 2012 iParadigms LLC. 16 #3 POORLY DESIGNED STUDIES ALLOCATION CONCEALMENT: COMBINED EVIDENCE
- 17. 5 BIGGEST CHALLENGES © 2012 iParadigms LLC. 17 #2 PRESSURE TO PUBLISH ACCORDING TO THE SURVEY, 58% BELIEVE “PRESSURE TO PUBLISH” IS “SERIOUS” AND 20% DEEMED “VERY SERIOUS.” (SO A TOTAL OF 78% THINK IT’S A PROBLEM) #ethics2013
- 18. 5 BIGGEST CHALLENGES © 2012 iParadigms LLC. 18 #2 PRESSURE TO PUBLISH • LIMITED GRANT FUNDS • ACADEMIC MANDATES • CONSEQUENCES • CHURNING OUT HIGH NUMBERS OF PAPERS • CHASING PUBLICATION IN HIGH IMPACT JOURNALS • SLOPPINESS • EVEN POTENTIALLY RESEARCH MISCONDUCT #ethics2013
- 19. 5 BIGGEST CHALLENGES © 2012 iParadigms LLC. 19 #2 PRESSURE TO PUBLISH • MCGRAIL MR, RICKARD CM, JONES R. PUBLISH OR PERISH: A SYSTEMATIC REVIEW OF INTERVENTIONS TO INCREASE ACADEMIC PUBLICATION RATES. HEALTH EDUCATION RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT 2006;25:19-35 • COUNCIL OF SCIENCE EDITORS #ethics2013
- 20. 5 BIGGEST CHALLENGES © 2012 iParadigms LLC. 20 #1 PLAGIARISM AMONG THE GENERAL CHALLENGES PRESENTED TO RESPONDENTS, “PLAGIARISM AND MISCONDUCT” RANKED THE HIGHEST, WITH 82% OF EDITORS DEEMING IT “SERIOUS” OR “VERY SERIOUS.” #ethics2013
- 21. PLAGIARISM © 2012 iParadigms LLC. 21 #ethics2013
- 22. PLAGIARISM © 2012 iParadigms LLC. 22 #ethics2013
- 23. 5 BIGGEST CHALLENGES © 2012 iParadigms LLC. 23 RECAP OF SURVEY RESULTS
- 24. RECAP OF SURVEY RESULTS © 2012 iParadigms LLC. 24 #ethics2013
- 25. SURVEY RESULTS: TOP 5 © 2012 iParadigms LLC. 25
- 26. 5 BIGGEST CHALLENGES © 2012 iParadigms LLC. 26 PREVENTION & RESOURCES #ethics2013
- 27. PLAGIARISM PREVENTION © 2012 iParadigms LLC. 27
- 28. 5 BIGGEST CHALLENGES © 2012 iParadigms LLC. 28 PREVENTION & RESOURCES •PLAGIARISM DETECTION TECHNOLOGY •EXPOSE RESEARCHERS, PEER REVIEWERS, AND EDITORS TO COURSES ON RESEARCHER INTEGRITY AND PUBLICATION ETHICS •UNIVERSITIES AND RESEARCH INSTITUTES NEED TO PROMOTE THIS AVENUE OF LEARNING •PUBLISHERS AND OTHERS NEED TO HELP FUND THIS INITIATIVE •ESTABLISH A NEW PROFESSIONAL • PUBLICATIONS OFFICER
- 29. 5 BIGGEST CHALLENGES © 2012 iParadigms LLC. 29 PREVENTION & RESOURCES ASSOCIATIONS & WEBSITE: • PUBLICATIONETHICS.ORG • WAME.ORG • COUNCIL OF SCIENCE EDITORS • ICMJE • EQUATOR-NETWORK.ORG • ISTME • EASE.ORG.UK #ethics2013
- 34. Q&A © 2012 iParadigms LLC. 34 QUESTIONS OR COMMENTS? #ethics2013
- 35. THANK YOU 35 © 2012 iParadigms LLC. Questions? ask@ithenticate.com To hear the recording, visit: ithenticate.com/5-biggest-challenges-webcast Full Survey Report (PDF): ithenticate.com/Portals/92785/docs/ithenticate-editors-ethics-survey-results-2013.pdf #ethics2013
Editor's Notes
- POLL 1 options: Editor Editorial staff Editorial management Researcher Author Freelancer Student Professor Other POLL 2 options: Technological advances that simplify image or data falsification Conflicts of interest between researchers and industry Poorly designed studies Pressure to publish Plagiarism
- NOTES: According to the survey, “image data/falsification” was deemed serious by more than a third of respondents.
- NOTES: According to the survey, “image data/falsification” was deemed serious by more than a third of respondents.
- NOTES: According to the survey, “image data/falsification” was deemed serious by more than a third of respondents.
- NOTES: According to the survey, “image data/falsification” was deemed serious by more than a third of respondents.
- NOTES: According to the survey, “image data/falsification” was deemed serious by more than a third of respondents.
- NOTES: According to the survey, close to half of respondents believe that “conflicts of interest” were serious challenges.
- NOTES: According to the survey, close to half of respondents believe that “conflicts of interest” were serious challenges.
- NOTES: According to the survey, close to half of editors believed that “poorly designed studies” were serious challenges.
- NOTES: According to the survey, close to half of editors believed that “poorly designed studies” were serious challenges.
- NOTES: According to the survey, close to half of editors believed that “poorly designed studies” were serious challenges.
- Notes: According to the survey, 58% believe “pressure to publish” is “serious” and 20% deemed “very serious.” (So that is 78% think it’s a problem)
- Notes: According to the survey, 58% believe “pressure to publish” is “serious” and 20% deemed “very serious.” (So that is 78% think it’s a problem)
- Notes: According to the survey, 58% believe “pressure to publish” is “serious” and 20% deemed “very serious.” (So that is 78% think it’s a problem)
- Notes: Among the general challenges presented to respondents, “plagiarism and misconduct” ranked the highest, with 82 percent of editors deeming it “serious” or “very serious.” (Breaks down to 58% serious and 24% very serious)
- Notes: Among the general challenges presented to respondents, “plagiarism and misconduct” ranked the highest, with 82 percent of editors deeming it “serious” or “very serious.” (Breaks down to 58% serious and 24% very serious)
- Notes: Among the general challenges presented to respondents, “plagiarism and misconduct” ranked the highest, with 82 percent of editors deeming it “serious” or “very serious.” (Breaks down to 58% serious and 24% very serious)
- Notes: Among the general challenges presented to respondents, “plagiarism and misconduct” ranked the highest, with 82 percent of editors deeming it “serious” or “very serious.” (Breaks down to 58% serious and 24% very serious)
- Notes:
- Notes: Among the general challenges presented to respondents, “plagiarism and misconduct” ranked the highest, with 82 percent of editors deeming it “serious” or “very serious.” (Breaks down to 58% serious and 24% very serious)
- Notes:
- Notes: Among the general challenges presented to respondents, “plagiarism and misconduct” ranked the highest, with 82 percent of editors deeming it “serious” or “very serious.” (Breaks down to 58% serious and 24% very serious)
- Notes:
- Notes:
- All attendees will receive an email with the link to the recording and a link to the full survey results PDF.