3. Name: Joel Harvey Mark Reasons
Research and planning: He
explored ideas, characters,
costumes, location shots
and mood boards.
14 He spelt ‘influences’ wrong but had a
clear layout. He used different technology
throughout his presentation such as Prezi,
photos, YouTube and Blendspace.
Construction: 48 Low level lighting is used throughout as
well as freeze frame and other effects.
Although there was no close up he used
different technology and used clear dialect.
4. Name: Luke Arkers Mark Reasons
Research and planning: He
backs up writing with
evidence.
18 Luke includes lots of detail and has used
different technology however he could of
neatened out some of his layout.
Construction: 52 Good backing music was used as it
represented a heart beat. An over the
shoulder shot was used as well as lots of
wide, long and establishing shots. As well
as this there was a strong clear dialect.
5. Name: Louise Nicholas Mark Reasons
Research and planning:
Completed everything to a
moderate standard.
12 Not very detailed with little writing in
some areas. Not distributed evenly.
Construction: 20 The camera wasn't stable, should of been
used with a tripod and the informative
writing wasn't up long enough for the
audience to read. As well as this the music
was too loud and overpowered the whole film.
6. Name: James Powell Mark Reasons
Research and planning: Very
clear and informative
planning and research.
19 Used different technology throughout and was
very detailed. All the information in the
research and planning was very good but the
props presentation and information was bad
in comparison to the rest of his work.
Construction: 49 The scene changed with the bell (parallel
sound) which shows thought in techniques as
well as low level lighting and different
shot types.