The OJ Simpson trial introduced many to DNA evidence, which at the time was confusing for jurors to understand. Now juries expect and seek DNA and other scientific evidence, especially in cases relying on circumstantial evidence. While the desire for scientific evidence can help prosecutors, it may also cause juries to underestimate the value of other evidence and witness testimony if high-tech forensic proof is not presented.

1. The OJ Simpson murder trial introduced jurors, and those following the broadcast of the trial, to
DNA evidence. At the time, the concept was confusing and difficult for jurors to understand.
This
article explains that now, juries seek DNA and other scientific evidence in cases, especially when
the evidence is circumstantial.
Explain why the “CSI effect― is helpful to the parties in a criminal case. Distinguish the
harmful results of the CSI effect.
This response requires 75-100 words.