SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 3
The red pen campaign
There has been a significant and celebrated change in how private
sector newspapersand journalscan cover the election compared with
fiveyears ago.
The election campaign had begun and the kyatwas makingnews but no
one was reading about it. It was September 2010 and pre-publication
censorship was ensuringthat election news wasbeing subjected to
rigorousscrutiny. Asusual, some stories were being rejected in their
entirety.
One was about a sudden and unexpected strengtheningof the kyat
against the US dollar. It wassubmitted to the censors by the Myanmar
Times, where I was workingas foreign newseditor. I was also compiling
a record of rejected or mutilated stories that I’d begun the previous
month when the governmentannounced thatthe election would be held
on November 7. Asthe Myanmar Timesand all other privatesector
journalswereto learn in the comingweeks, any story that touched on
the country’sfirstparliamentary election since 1960 wasalmost certain
to be cut or rejected. The censors never gavereasons for wieldingtheir
red pens, even if asked, and wecould only speculate about the necessary
instructionsthat may have informed their decisions.
The kyatstory mentioned pre-election currency hoardingas a possible
reason why it had strengthened from 975 to the dollar on September 6
to 910 three dayslater. Other reasons given in the story for the rise in
the valueof the kyat included repercussionsfrom Myanmar’s closureof
the Myawaddy-MaeSotborder tradingpoint and capital raising by four
new banks. The report quoted a Yangon economist, U Khin MaungNyo,
as saying a major reason behind the strengthening of the kyat wasa
general businessslowdown becauseof the election and the closure of
the border (because of a disputewith Thailand over an embankmentit
was buildingon the Moei River, which formsthe frontier. The
Myawaddy-MaeSotborder crossing did not reopen until December 5,
2011). Perhaps the juntawas sensitive to the consequencesof the
decision to close the border and its effect on tradewith Thailand. The
reportalso quoted the chairman of the Crab Entrepreneurs’Association,
U Hninn Oo, as sayingmany exportershad suffered financially from the
border closure, includingthose dealingin rice, seafood and beans and
pulses.
Not surprisingly, the launchof the election campaign was lead story in
the September 13, 2010, edition of the Myanmar Times. It was
published remarkably intact, though the three minor cuts were
mystifying. Onewas a quote by U Ye Tun, chairman of the 88 Generation
StudentYouths (Union of Myanmar), that someof the party’scandidates
had to sell property to raise fundsfor campaigning. Another was a
commentby National Democratic Force chairman Dr Than Nyein about
its prospectsin the election. The censors cut an admission by Dr Than
Nyein that the NDFwould “struggle to emulate the NLD’s success” in
1990, when the party led by Daw AungSan Suu Kyi won 392 of 492
seats in the election for a constituent assembly. The final cut resonates
with concerns permeatingthe campaign this year. It was a commentby
Dr Than Nyein that one of the two factors on which the success of the
NDFwould depend was“whether the authorities concerned are eager to
make the comingelection a free and fair one”. It was a prescient
concern. They weren’tand it wasn’t.
Although censorship decisionswere often difficultto comprehend, cuts
could be expected in any story about membersof the junta or its
activities. A reportin the September 13 edition about a visit to Chinaby
juntaleader Senior GeneralThan Shwe was no exception. The Agence
France-Presse despatchcovered his high-level talks in Beijing before
travelling to Shanghai to visit the World Expo.
It included a sentence that began by saying: “China has longsupported
Myanmar throughtrade ties, investmentsin its large naturalresources
…” and from which wascut “… armssales and by shielding it from UN
sanctions as a veto-wieldingmember of the Security Council”.
Facts of history could also have the censorsseeing red. The next
sentence began, “In return, Chinais assured of a stable neighbour and
access to raw materials such as teak and gems from Myanmar …“ and
from which wasexcised “… which has been ruled by the military since
1962”.
Geoffrey Goddard hasworked inAustralia and Asia for more than40
yearsand had variousrolesat the Myanmar Timesbetween2001 and
2013.
FM 12 censorship in 2010 EDITED

More Related Content

Similar to FM 12 censorship in 2010 EDITED

U.S. Presidential election China implications
U.S. Presidential election China implications U.S. Presidential election China implications
U.S. Presidential election China implications Brunswick Group
 
The Rise of China Media Perception
The Rise of China Media PerceptionThe Rise of China Media Perception
The Rise of China Media PerceptionGatheru Kinyori
 
FM14 censorship series EDITED
FM14 censorship series EDITEDFM14 censorship series EDITED
FM14 censorship series EDITEDgeoffrey goddard
 
Week 4 freedom of press
Week 4 freedom of pressWeek 4 freedom of press
Week 4 freedom of pressHillary Okech
 
There are two articles below and in the modules section), one di.docx
There are two articles below and in the modules section), one di.docxThere are two articles below and in the modules section), one di.docx
There are two articles below and in the modules section), one di.docxrelaine1
 
Will the 2016 congress be the moment of change in Vietnamese politics?
Will the 2016 congress be the moment of change in Vietnamese politics?Will the 2016 congress be the moment of change in Vietnamese politics?
Will the 2016 congress be the moment of change in Vietnamese politics?erna8nielsen65
 
Thesis_Template_Allison_Solomon_FINALv1
Thesis_Template_Allison_Solomon_FINALv1Thesis_Template_Allison_Solomon_FINALv1
Thesis_Template_Allison_Solomon_FINALv1Allison Solomon
 
CHINESE INFLUENCE FACES UNCERTAIN FUTURE IN MYANMAR
CHINESE INFLUENCE FACES UNCERTAIN FUTURE IN MYANMARCHINESE INFLUENCE FACES UNCERTAIN FUTURE IN MYANMAR
CHINESE INFLUENCE FACES UNCERTAIN FUTURE IN MYANMARMYO AUNG Myanmar
 
FM13 censorship series EDITED
FM13 censorship series EDITEDFM13 censorship series EDITED
FM13 censorship series EDITEDgeoffrey goddard
 
An unfavorable-business-mdif-report
An unfavorable-business-mdif-reportAn unfavorable-business-mdif-report
An unfavorable-business-mdif-reportsaiyawnlu
 
Finpro Basic country study myanmar final
Finpro Basic country study myanmar finalFinpro Basic country study myanmar final
Finpro Basic country study myanmar finalBusiness Finland
 

Similar to FM 12 censorship in 2010 EDITED (13)

U.S. Presidential election China implications
U.S. Presidential election China implications U.S. Presidential election China implications
U.S. Presidential election China implications
 
The Rise of China Media Perception
The Rise of China Media PerceptionThe Rise of China Media Perception
The Rise of China Media Perception
 
FM14 censorship series EDITED
FM14 censorship series EDITEDFM14 censorship series EDITED
FM14 censorship series EDITED
 
Week 4 freedom of press
Week 4 freedom of pressWeek 4 freedom of press
Week 4 freedom of press
 
Human Trafficking
Human TraffickingHuman Trafficking
Human Trafficking
 
There are two articles below and in the modules section), one di.docx
There are two articles below and in the modules section), one di.docxThere are two articles below and in the modules section), one di.docx
There are two articles below and in the modules section), one di.docx
 
Will the 2016 congress be the moment of change in Vietnamese politics?
Will the 2016 congress be the moment of change in Vietnamese politics?Will the 2016 congress be the moment of change in Vietnamese politics?
Will the 2016 congress be the moment of change in Vietnamese politics?
 
Thesis_Template_Allison_Solomon_FINALv1
Thesis_Template_Allison_Solomon_FINALv1Thesis_Template_Allison_Solomon_FINALv1
Thesis_Template_Allison_Solomon_FINALv1
 
CHINESE INFLUENCE FACES UNCERTAIN FUTURE IN MYANMAR
CHINESE INFLUENCE FACES UNCERTAIN FUTURE IN MYANMARCHINESE INFLUENCE FACES UNCERTAIN FUTURE IN MYANMAR
CHINESE INFLUENCE FACES UNCERTAIN FUTURE IN MYANMAR
 
FM13 censorship series EDITED
FM13 censorship series EDITEDFM13 censorship series EDITED
FM13 censorship series EDITED
 
An unfavorable-business-mdif-report
An unfavorable-business-mdif-reportAn unfavorable-business-mdif-report
An unfavorable-business-mdif-report
 
Finpro Basic country study myanmar final
Finpro Basic country study myanmar finalFinpro Basic country study myanmar final
Finpro Basic country study myanmar final
 
ABOUT ALTSEAN BURMA
ABOUT ALTSEAN BURMAABOUT ALTSEAN BURMA
ABOUT ALTSEAN BURMA
 

FM 12 censorship in 2010 EDITED

  • 1. The red pen campaign There has been a significant and celebrated change in how private sector newspapersand journalscan cover the election compared with fiveyears ago. The election campaign had begun and the kyatwas makingnews but no one was reading about it. It was September 2010 and pre-publication censorship was ensuringthat election news wasbeing subjected to rigorousscrutiny. Asusual, some stories were being rejected in their entirety. One was about a sudden and unexpected strengtheningof the kyat against the US dollar. It wassubmitted to the censors by the Myanmar Times, where I was workingas foreign newseditor. I was also compiling a record of rejected or mutilated stories that I’d begun the previous month when the governmentannounced thatthe election would be held on November 7. Asthe Myanmar Timesand all other privatesector journalswereto learn in the comingweeks, any story that touched on the country’sfirstparliamentary election since 1960 wasalmost certain to be cut or rejected. The censors never gavereasons for wieldingtheir red pens, even if asked, and wecould only speculate about the necessary instructionsthat may have informed their decisions. The kyatstory mentioned pre-election currency hoardingas a possible reason why it had strengthened from 975 to the dollar on September 6 to 910 three dayslater. Other reasons given in the story for the rise in the valueof the kyat included repercussionsfrom Myanmar’s closureof the Myawaddy-MaeSotborder tradingpoint and capital raising by four new banks. The report quoted a Yangon economist, U Khin MaungNyo, as saying a major reason behind the strengthening of the kyat wasa general businessslowdown becauseof the election and the closure of the border (because of a disputewith Thailand over an embankmentit was buildingon the Moei River, which formsthe frontier. The Myawaddy-MaeSotborder crossing did not reopen until December 5, 2011). Perhaps the juntawas sensitive to the consequencesof the decision to close the border and its effect on tradewith Thailand. The reportalso quoted the chairman of the Crab Entrepreneurs’Association, U Hninn Oo, as sayingmany exportershad suffered financially from the
  • 2. border closure, includingthose dealingin rice, seafood and beans and pulses. Not surprisingly, the launchof the election campaign was lead story in the September 13, 2010, edition of the Myanmar Times. It was published remarkably intact, though the three minor cuts were mystifying. Onewas a quote by U Ye Tun, chairman of the 88 Generation StudentYouths (Union of Myanmar), that someof the party’scandidates had to sell property to raise fundsfor campaigning. Another was a commentby National Democratic Force chairman Dr Than Nyein about its prospectsin the election. The censors cut an admission by Dr Than Nyein that the NDFwould “struggle to emulate the NLD’s success” in 1990, when the party led by Daw AungSan Suu Kyi won 392 of 492 seats in the election for a constituent assembly. The final cut resonates with concerns permeatingthe campaign this year. It was a commentby Dr Than Nyein that one of the two factors on which the success of the NDFwould depend was“whether the authorities concerned are eager to make the comingelection a free and fair one”. It was a prescient concern. They weren’tand it wasn’t. Although censorship decisionswere often difficultto comprehend, cuts could be expected in any story about membersof the junta or its activities. A reportin the September 13 edition about a visit to Chinaby juntaleader Senior GeneralThan Shwe was no exception. The Agence France-Presse despatchcovered his high-level talks in Beijing before travelling to Shanghai to visit the World Expo. It included a sentence that began by saying: “China has longsupported Myanmar throughtrade ties, investmentsin its large naturalresources …” and from which wascut “… armssales and by shielding it from UN sanctions as a veto-wieldingmember of the Security Council”. Facts of history could also have the censorsseeing red. The next sentence began, “In return, Chinais assured of a stable neighbour and access to raw materials such as teak and gems from Myanmar …“ and from which wasexcised “… which has been ruled by the military since 1962”. Geoffrey Goddard hasworked inAustralia and Asia for more than40 yearsand had variousrolesat the Myanmar Timesbetween2001 and 2013.