ISO 19152 4.The Standards… Using the CCDM model for the development of SURE enabled the domain model to sustain itself nearly immutable over time and adapt itself to a more standardized version of LADM such as ISO 19152. One of the greatest risks in technical, technological and financial sustainability faced by any property administration system lies in the protection against skilled staff turnover. The Honduras model considered from its onset, a solution that ensures the model its continuity by certifying professionals and establishing PPPs. The Public-Private Partnership (PPP) approach applied to the property administration is a trend almost irreversible in developed countries. The outsourcing scheme in Honduras is currently underway and has required a contextual phase-in adaptation...

1. Román Alvarez
PATH - Honduras
Towards an
Integrated Property
Administration Model
in Honduras
Land and Poverty Conference 2016:
Scaling up Responsible Land Governance

2. Content
 Background - New Model Context
 About Honduras
 Institutional Reforms
 The National Property Administration System (SINAP)
 SURE Timeline
 Current Property Administration Model Scenario
 Front-back Office client service schema
 Integrating certified professionals into the chain
 Outsourcing services toward a public-private partnership
 Evolution of SURE (1.0) to SINAP

3. Background
New Model Context

4. About Honduras
 Honduras is a country in Central America.
 Area: 112.492 km2
 Population: 8.7 million
 45% of the population lives below the
poverty line.
 20% lives in extreme poverty.
 80% of population lives in informal
settlements, not having any property title
that would provide legal certainty.
 70% of parcels nationwide have registration
irregularities or are not registered at all.

5. The new model actively involves different stakeholders in the
management of land and property rights, both private and public,
under a decentralized service delivery scheme on a common platform.
To improve the new model it was necessary to generate:
Legal reforms,
Technological platform,
Mechanized digitization of physical property books,
New cadastral scheme linked to the folio real registry.
New Model Issues

6. Institutional Reform
In 2004, the Property Law was enacted to create the
Property Institute IP, bringing together:
- Property Registry,
- National Cadaster
- National Geographic Institute
and creating an entity for
Land Regularization.
National
Geographic
Institute
Land
Regularizati
on
Property
Registry
National
Cadaster
Property Institute IP

7. National Property Administration System
(SINAP)
SINAP has three key subsystems:
 Unified Registries System (SURE),
which integrates information relating
to the property rights.
 Territorial Planning Norms Registry (RENOT),
which records Norms and territorial planning
laws reflected as use and occupancy
restrictions on properties.
 National Territorial Information System
(SINIT),
which registers and discloses national mapping
information.
SINAPSINITINDES SURERENOT
GEO
NODES

8. Systems
SURE-SINAP Timeline
2002
PAAR
Folio Real
Cadaster - Registry
Automation
2003
PATH
2012
2013
2014
Capital Market
Improvement
-Property Law
-Territorial Planning Law
-Forest Law Proposal
SURE
SINIT
RENOT
SINREC
1998 OGC - ISO/TC 211
SINAP Evolution
Plan
• LADM Standard
• Separate
Business | Media | Process
• Open Source Priority
• SOA N-layer Architecture
• OGC / ISO Standards
• Private – Public Alliance
• Software Factories SWF
2006
OSGeo
Found LADM ISO 19152CCDM - FIG
Design
SINAP II
2016
Development
SINAP II
2007
IDE
Standards
Evolution and
Versioning Schema
-Nation Plan
Law
2010
SIGIT
SINAPSURE | SINIT | RENOT
SIT - MOSEF
ISO-BIM -IFC
SOLA
OpenTenure
Cadastre
2014
-Public and Private
Patnership Law
CCDM - FIG

9. Juticalpa
Olanchito
Trujillo
Roatán
Comayagua
Nacaome
Choluteca
Distrito Central
Danlí
Yuscarán
Siguatepeque
Yoro
Progreso
La Ceiba
Tela
San Pedro Sula
Puerto Cortés
Santa Bárbara
Gracias
Santa Rosa
La PazMarcala
IntibucáOcotepeque
• 16 of 24 Registry Offices.
• 900 active users.
• 1.1 million parcels.
• 1.2 million real properties
• 239,000 cadastre parcels
linked to real properties
• 5.2 million scanned
property book images.
• 250.000 transactions
• 1.8 million user consults.
29.0 million US$ dollars
registry service income per
year.
The Unified Registries System
SURE
Registy Office - Digitized (13)
Parcially Digitized (3)
Registry Office - not Digitized (8)

10. Current Property
Administration Model
Scenario

11. Current Scenario Issues
New efforts are deployed as of 2013 to take the Property
Administration System to a scenario in line with the new institutional
context, international service delivery trends and technology
adoption.
For this new stage the following are being implemented:
 Front-back Office client service structure
 Integrating professionals into the property administration chain
 Outsourcing services toward a public-private partnership
 Evolution of SURE (1.0) to SINAP

12. Front-back Office client
service schema
SURE
(FolioRealSystem)
FrontOffice
(ClientService)
BackOffice
(ProcessingArea)
The Front – Office was separated
for submission of applications, form
revision of document authenticity
and compliance of requirements,
A window for Cadastral services
was included.
The Back Office or processing area
is physically separated, handling
substance revision of documents,
which determines approval or
denial of the property transaction.

13. Expedite Process Workflows with
the Front-Back Office Schema
User
Front Office
Back
Office
Reception
Digitizing
Distribution / Inscription
GIS Linking
GIS Validation / Update
Archive
Retrieve
User User
Digitizing on demand

14. Integrating certified professionals
into the property administration chain
Property Institue
-System
-Data Center
-Services
MunicipalitiesCertified Proffesionals
-Notaries
-Surveyors
(Policies)
-Cartography
-Regularization
-Other Registries
Outsourcing
Operator
Finite
Projects

15. Benefits of Integrating certified
professionals into the property Chain
• Transfer of responsibilities from the Institution to the
professionals.
• Enhances the outsourcing of Technical Jobs.
• Easy integration of the Municipalities as Associated
Centers.
• Take advantage of Public and Private Partnership
(Cadastre2014).
• Sustainability - reducing the cost of massive surveying
projects (Cadastre 2014).

16. Phase 1: Cortés, Francisco Morazán.
Phase 2: Comayagua, Yoro, Atlántida,
Colón, Islas de la Bahía, Valle, Choluteca,
Gracias a Dios.
Phase 3: El Paraíso, Olancho, La Paz, Intibucá
Phase 4: Santa Bárbara, Copán, Ocotepeque,
Lempira.
Property Registry to become Front
Offices
Regional Processing Center (Back-Office)
Regional Border Zone
Transition Proposal
Juticalpa
Olanchito
Trujillo
Roatán
Comayagua
Nacaome
Choluteca
Distrito Central
Danlí
Yuscarán
Siguatepeque
Yoro
El Progreso
La Ceiba
Tela
San Pedro Sula
Puerto Cortés
Santa Bárbara
Gracias
Santa Rosa
La PazMarcala
IntibucáOcotepeque
Outsourcing services toward a public-
private partnership

17. Evolution of SURE (1.0) to SINAP
SOAN-layerSINAPModel
GATEWAY
WEB
CONTAINERDATATIER
Data
Logic
Presentation
External
Internal
JBOSS
Wildfly
EJB
JNDI
Web
Services
DBMS
FRONTTIER
Data
Logic
External
Internal
CORE
Process
Presentation
Utilitary
Services
Entity
Services
Task
Services
Maps
Images
Portlets
Viewers
Enterprise Componets
WSRP
Presentation
Oracle
MongoDB
Application
Services
BPMN
Legacy
Systems
CORE
Connection Tier
Persistence Tier
Connection Tier
Persistence Tier

18. Evolution of SURE (1.0) to SINAP
Policies
Rules Engine
Presentation Tier Middle Tier
- Enrichment
TopDown
(XSD)
- Throughput
- Transaction
- Compensation
- Retry
- Failover
- Timeout
Gateway
Broker
Adaptors
<xml> BPMN
- Enrichment
- Compiling versioning
- Cache
Parties
Charges
RPI
Vehicles
DEI
Etc…
Property
Institute
IP
DEI
IP
RV
IP
RNP
Bank
Municipalities
DEI
IP
INA
ICF
SEFIN
Etc…
Service
Request
Remote Local Local Local
Remote
Local
CORE - SINAP Model
Orchestor
Adaptors
Engine

19. Conclusions
1. Transactional time and cost reduction is the top focus sought by the
modernization of the property administration system in Honduras in order to
generate wealth and fuel the economy. Prioritizing these objectives help all the
modernization efforts be seen as a means rather than an end.
3. The regulatory framework reform was the trigger to transform the property
administration system in Honduras, which required high-level political will to
restructure key budgetary, structural, and institutional aspects including
territorial management binding laws.
5. One of the keys to success in adopting the property administration model was the
restructuring of the institutional scheme, delimitating competences for key
players across the chain that create, modify and affect property rights.

20. Conclusions
4. The Standards… Using the CCDM model for the development of SURE enabled
the domain model to sustain itself nearly immutable over time and adapt itself to
a more standardized version of LADM such as ISO 19152.
5. One of the greatest risks in technical, technological and financial sustainability
faced by any property administration system lies in the protection against skilled
staff turnover. The Honduras model considered from its onset, a solution that
ensures the model its continuity by certifying professionals and establishing PPPs.
8. The Public-Private Partnership (PPP) approach applied to the property
administration is a trend almost irreversible in developed countries. The
outsourcing scheme in Honduras is currently underway and has required a
contextual phase-in adaptation.

21. Conclusions
7. The adoption of the Front-Back Office scheme in Honduras enables to centralize
the traceability, mutation and securitization in one single Operator, making best
use of existing windows, such as banks, municipalities and CPs to serve the end
user.

22. Thank you