ISO 15189 2022 standards for laboratory quality and competence
Protocols and Pathways Ischemic and Hemorrhagic Strokes.ppt
1. Protocols and Pathways:
Ischemic and Hemorrhagic Stroke
Abby Doerr, APN, FNP-BC, ANVP, SCRN
Procedural APN: Neurointerventional Surgery
Northwestern Medicine Central DuPage Hospital
3. Objectives
• Discuss the definitions of clinical pathways and protocols.
• Identify and discuss the potential benefits of
implementation of clinical pathways.
• Review the evidence related to clinical pathways
recommendations in stroke.
• Identify and discuss key components for inclusion in
ischemic and hemorrhagic stroke clinical pathways.
5. Definitions
Clinical Pathway
“A clinical pathway is a method for the patient-care management of a
well-defined group of patients during a well-defined period of time.
A clinical pathway explicitly states the goal and key elements of care
based on Evidence Based Medicine (EBM) guidelines, best practice
and patient expectations by facitlitating the communication,
coordinating roles and sequening the activities of the multidisciplinary
care team, aptients, and their relatives; by documenting, monitoring
and evaluating variances; and by providing the necessary resources
and outcomes.”
De Bleser, L., et al. (2006) Defining Pathways
6. Definitions
Protocols
“Clinical protocols can be seen as more specific than
guidelines, defined in greater detail.
Protocols provide a comprehensive set of rigid criteria
outlining the management steps for a single clinical condition
or aspects of organization"
Retrieved from: http://www.openclinical.org/guidelines.html
7. Definitions
•Clinical Pathway
Multidisciplinary approach
• Physicians, nursing, ancillary services
Evidence based approach to standardized patient care
Focused on improving quality of care
•Protocols
Guideline based outline of management of a specific
condition
Focused on adherence to guidelines
8. Protocol vs Pathway
• Protocols are treatment recommendations that are often
based on guidelines.
Similar to clinical pathway, the goal of the clinical
protocol may be to decrease treatment variation.
• Protocols are most often focused on guideline
compliance rather than the identification of reducing
unnecessary steps in the patient care process.
• Unlike critical pathways, protocols may or may not
include a continuous monitoring or data-evaluation
components.
What’sthedifference??
9. Clinical Pathways
• To improve patient care
• To maximize the efficient use of resources
• To help identify and clarify the clinical processes
• To support clinical effectiveness, clinical audit and risk
management
• The aim of a clinical pathway is to improve the quality of
care, reduce risks, increase patient satisfaction and
increase the efficiency in the use of resources.
De Bleser, L., et al. (2006) Defining Pathways
Benefits ofimplementation
11. Protocols and Pathways: Stroke
• Target: Stroke Key Practice Strategies
Strategy #4: Stroke tools
• “A stroketoolkit containingclinicaldecisionsupport,stroke-specificorder sets,
guidelines,hospital-specific algorithms,criticalpathways,NIH StrokeScale, and other
stroketools shouldbe available and used for each patient”
Strategy #9: Team-based approach
• “The team approachbasedon standardizedstroke pathwaysand protocolshas
proveneffective in increaseingthe number of eligiblepatientstreatedandreducing
time to treatment in stroke. An interdisciplinary collaborative team is also essential
for successfulstrokeperformance improvement efforts. The team shouldmeet
frequentlyto reviewyour hospital’sprocesses,care quality, patient safety parameters
and clinical outcomes, as well as to make recommendationsfor improvement.”
• Target: Stroke Phase II recommendations
Rapid triage protocol and stroke team notification
• Facilitatestimely recognitionof stroke and reducestime to treatment
Evidence Based Practice: fromtheliterature
Fonarow, G. et al. (2011) Improving door-to-needle times in acute ischemic stroke: the
design and rationale for the AHA/ASA Target: Stroke Initiative
AHA Target: Stroke Phase II, 2014
12. Protocols and Pathways: Stroke
• Qualitative evaluation of “top performing” hospitals GWTG registry
found process to be a key theme to successful early administration
of IV tPA
Process = established care protocols and patterns
• National Health and Family Planning Commission of China findings
from testing of stroke clinical pathway
Pathways streamline management of patients with stroke
Avoid unnecessary delays
Improve quality of treatment
Improve quality of rehabilitation
Resulted in decreased LOS and overall healthcare costs
No sacrifice in treatment quality was noted in this trial
Evidence Based Practice: fromtheliterature
Olsen, D, et al. (2011). A qualitative assessment of practices associated with shorter
door-to-needle time for thrombolytic therapy in acute ischemic stroke
Deng, et al. (2014) Reduction of length of stay and costs through implementation of
clinical pathways for stroke management in China
14. Necessary Components
• Multidisciplinary Team
Nursing
Vascular Neurology
Neurosurgery
Neurocritical Care (if available)
Neurointerventional Surgery
Stroke Protocols andPathways
15. Necessary Components • Other team members
Emergency medicine
Radiology
Rehab medicine
Physical therapy
Occupational therapy
Speech therapy
Pharmacy
Hospice services
Stroke Protocols andPathways
16. Necessary Components
Stroke Protocols andPathways
Stroke APNs
ER Physicians* &
Staff
PATIENT
Stroke Neurology &
Code Neuro RNs*
Neurointerventional
Surgery & Staff
Neurosurgery
Neuro Critical
Care Physicians*
& Staff
Hospitalists* & Neuro
Step-Down Staff
Neuroradiology
PT, OT, Speech
Respiratory
Therapy
Pharmacy
Case
Management,
Social Work
Neuropsychology
Lab
Dietary
Music & Pet
Therapy
EMS
Neuro Rehab
It takes an ARMY to care for the acute stroke patient
17. Necessary Components
• A smaller “core team” should be
developed within the larger
team creating the pathway.
• The team’s lead person (or
people) should be charged with
Coordination of the project
Ensuring the opinions of all
needed have been obtained
and considered
Finally coordination of the
approval/roll out phase
Stroke Protocols andPathways
18. Necessary Components
• Re-evaluation
Consider re-evaluation and updating of protocols and
pathways per hospital policy (~ every 2 years)
• Updated guidelines?
Consider meeting with core team
Develop updated pathways/protocols
Submit for multidisciplinary team approval
• Have a plan!
What to do when updates are needed
How to proceed with update, approval and implementation
of practice/guideline changes
Stroke Protocols andPathways
21. Necessary Components
• Ischemic Stroke/TIA: first 72
hours
Nutrition
Nutrition and hydration needs?
NG feeding within 24 hrs for those
unable to safely swallow
Referrals/Consults
Education
Discharge Planning
• Prevention of complications
GI prophylaxis
Aspiration pneumonia
• Oral care
VTE prophylaxis
• Chemical vs mechanical?
Infection risk
• Avoiding unnecessary use of
indwelling urinary catheters
SKIN
Stroke Protocols andPathways
Middleton, Grimley & Alexandrov (2015) Triage, treatment and transfer:…:
22. Necessary Components
• Hypertension management: Goals for target BP are uncertain currently,
however, the following are recommended
Prethrombolysis: SBP <185 mm Hg and DBP <110 mm Hg
• class I: levelof evidenceB
Post–r-tPA bolus: target <180 mm Hg SBP, <105 mm Hg DBP
Nonthrombolysed ischemic stroke: BP lowering by ~15% during the first
24 h after stroke
• WithholdmedicationsunlessSBP >220 mm Hg or DBP >120 mm Hg (class I: levelof evidenceC)
ICH: Intensive BP lowering is safe and feasible
• BP loweringwithin6 h of ICH onset to a target systolicBP of <140 mm Hg may improve
functionaloutcome at 3 mo after stroke as comparedwitha traditionalBP-loweringtarget of
<180 mm Hg (classI: levelof evidence B)
Subarachnoid hemorrhage: Reduction of systolic BP to a target of 90/160
mm Hg until the aneurysm has been occluded by endovascular or surgical
means (GPP)
Stroke Protocols andPathways
Middleton, Grimley & Alexandrov (2015) Triage, treatment and transfer:…:
24. Necessary Components
• Considerations
How long to wait for trach and peg?
• Aspiration precautions
• Dietary considerations – when to begin tube feedings?
When to get out of bed?
• Early mobilization
Baseline/repeat imaging?
• Post bleed imaging, timeline preference?
Labs?
• Hypercoagulation work up?
• keeping in mind the TJC mandated timelines (Lipids, glucose, etc)
Cardiac work up?
• ECHO, TEE?
Stroke Protocols andPathways
26. Protocols and Pathways: Stroke
• Samples/examples are available for download
www.heart.org
• Get with the Guidelines – Stroke Clinical Tools Library
• St. Vincent’s Medical
• Hemorrhagic
• Non-hemorrhagic/TIA Stroke
• MassachusettsGeneral protocols
Examples
37. Summary
• Pathways require a multidisciplinary approach
• Pathways and protocols promote a systematic, evidence
based, potentially streamlined hospitalization
Pathways: improving quality care
Protocols: adherence to guidelines
• Creating pathway: research, review others work, determine
what is best for YOUR clinical setting
• Remember: do not reinvent the wheel!
Phone a friend
www.heart.org
Review the evidence
Pathways andProtocols inStroke
Literature review By De Bleser et al found 84 different defintions of clinical pathways in 82 articles – suggested definition based on those studies
The obvious team members to include in developing, writing and approval of pathways in stroke
As we all know, each of these team members have different goals and objectives on the various days of the hsopitalization and recovery in stroke. It is critical to establish an agreed upon plan with buy in from each of these teams. If you don’t have the buy-in the pathways will struggle to succeed and will struggle to make a positive impact on outcomes.
Other team members to include in planning and writing pathways as well as final approval. Having the opinions and recommendations of the various therapy services and rehabilitation would be key to development of a comprehensive set of pathways in stroke. What about ER and Radiology?? They too should have input on their respective areas.
A smaller “core team” should be developed within the larger team creating the pathway. This person (or people) should be charged with coordination of the project, ensuring the opinions of all needed have been obtained and considered and finally coordination of the approval/roll out phase.
Often when creating protocols less comprehesive list of team members is needed for the development of the protocol. These are typically based on a guideline or other recommendation. Again, as mentioned before, protocols are more of a step by step list where the pathway is a comprehensive – multidisplinary set of goals, tasks and objectives for each day of a hospitalization. The rehabilition services are critical to the various stages of recovery in the stroke population.
Pathway and protocol development is NO DIFFERENT! IT TAKES AN ARMY! Multiple people from multiple specialties.
The project lead needs to be able to coordinate a mutlitude of moving parts throughout the creation of the pathways and protocols. This person needs to be knowledgeable of the program, its goals, the guidelines and the politics within the groups/practices/departments. Yes, that’s right the politics. The person needs to be able to navigate the various groups to be able to get the buy in to make the pathways successful.
When looking at the ever changing world of medicine your team must have a plan for what to do when clinical practice updates occur. The team should have an established plan for updating, approving and implementing the practice change
Diagnostic testing:
Treatments:
Nursing considerations
Monitoring
Comprehensive nursing care assessment within 4 h of stroke unit admission for nutritional and hydration needs, positioning and mobilization needs, bladder control and \ incontinence management, pressure ulcer risk, cognitive and language capacity, hearing and visual needs, and family/carer needs (GPP)5
VTE: The use of anticoagulation provides superior VTE prophylaxis in patients with acute ischemic stroke (class I: level of evidence A).
The use of intermittent pneumatic compression for immobile patients reduces the risk of VTE and possibly death (class I: level of evidence B).
As you may have seen previously there are a variety of BP parameters and recommendations – this contributes to the need for SEPARATE pathways/protocols for hemorrhagic vs ischemic stroke.
Tools shared by sites utilizing GWTG for stroke – variety of tools and resources to aid in development of order sets, pathways, protocols. Do not recreate the wheel, perhaps try to redesign it to fit your program
Protocols, pathways and algorithms
Large variety of best practice tools available for download and viewing.
Note the activities, assessments and goals are designated per day
Diagnostic testing, nursing care, nutrition etc have their own specific section
Similar structure is noted in the hemorrhagic pathway; designated by hospital day
Both the hemorrhagic and ischemic pathways include an interdisciplinary care plan. These can and should be included in the facilities pathway. The nursing diagnosis here should be familiar to most here. Note the comment on the intervention performed and whether the outcome has been met.
Mass general shared various protocols such as ICH – note the first step in the protocol is the ICH score? Determining severity prior to treatment This enables the team to have appropriate risk/benefit and outcome conversations between the family, patient and other team members
Other protocols from Mass Gen such as BP management in acute stroke. Note the stepwise fashion utilized to manage HTN. The use of protocols help to ensure consistency in treatment and use of best practice/EBP
Other protocols may look like a flow chart as this one does from Central DuPage hospital. A series of yes/no responses within a decision tree leading to the treatment recommendations for a particular patient presentation.
Again leading to standardized, evidence based (presumably!) care for the patients