3. 1. Introduction
Definition
No universally accepted definition
Failure of implantation
After 3 consecutive IVF attempts,
after transfer of at least 4 good-quality embryos
in a woman under the age of 40 ys
(Simon and Laufer, 2012; Coughlan et al, 2013).
Aboubakr Elnashar
4. Failure of implantation
after 2 consecutive cycles
after transfer of at least 4 good-quality embryos
or 2 blastocysts
(Polanski et al, 2014)
Not the same as R IVF F.
subgroup of R IVF F
Aboubakr Elnashar
5. Incidence
10% of the cycles
(Margalioth et al, 2006).
Impact
Distress to couples
Frustration to doctor
Increases the cost of the procedure
Management
Major challenge to clinicians and embryologists.
Aboubakr Elnashar
11. Investigations for endometrial causes:
(Simon and Laufer, 2012)
1. Hysteroscopy: intra-uterine pathology
2. TVS/ MRI: Structural uterine anomalies
3. HSG: hydrosalpinges
4. Hormone profile: Endometrial defects secondary to
endocrine aberrations
5. Endometrial Biopsy: uNK cells
6. Blood tests for thrombophilia and
antiphospholipid antibodies.
7. All tests: normal: test for HLA similarity
Aboubakr Elnashar
12. Investigation of embriologic factors
(Simon and Laufer, 2012, Coughlan et al, 2013)
1. Ovarian reserve tests
basal FSH, AMH, AFC
to exclude any significant compromise of ovarian
function: help in the counseling.
2. Sperm DNA fragmentation:
Sperm Chromatin Structure Assay (SCSA):
Sperm chromatin dispersion test (SCD)
DNA fragmentation index
>27%: RIF
(Larson et al.,2000; Larson-Cook et al., 2003)
Aboubakr Elnashar
13. Damaged DNA : no halo.
Intact DNA: chromatin dispersion halo
Aboubakr Elnashar
14. 3. Karyotype
to rule out structural anomalies of chromosomes.
2.5%
(Stern et al., 1999)
4. If a structural anomaly:
preimplantation genetic diagnosis
Aboubakr Elnashar
16. I. Endometrial
1. Correction of anatomic factors
Hysteroscopic correction of uterine cavity
pathology
(Demirol and Gurgan, 2004).
Removal of fibroids
Distorting the uterine cavity
Intramural ≥5cm
(Donnez and Jadoul, 2002).
Aboubakr Elnashar
17. 2. Improvement of endometrial function
a. Treatment of thin endometrium
To improve uterine blood
low-dose aspirin
(Weckstein et al., 1997)
vaginal sildenafil
(Sher and Fisch, 2002)
Freeze all embryos (when the endometrium <7
mm) and transfer them after stimulation with high-
dose estrogens
Aboubakr Elnashar
18. Vaginal micronized estradiol
(Tourgeman et al., 2001)
Antifibrotic: pentoxifylline (Trental) and
high-dose vitamin E
(Ledee-Bataille et al., 2002)
Aboubakr Elnashar
19. b. Endometrial sctatching
When:
cycle preceding the actual treatment cycle.
(Friedler et al., 1993; Barash et al., 2003; Raziel et al., 2007; Zhou et
al., 2008).
7 days prior to the onset of menstruation,
immediately before the start of ovarian stimulation
for IVF tt.
In the follicular phase of the index cycle : no
benefit
(Karimzade et al., 2010; Zhou et al., 2008).
Not on the day of OR:
significantly reduce CPR
(Nastri et al, 2012)
Aboubakr Elnashar
20. How
biopsy/scratch or hysteroscopy: CPR doubled.
(Raziel et al., 2007 ; Narvekar et al, 2010)
CPR: twice as high with biopsy/scratch as
opposed to hysteroscopy
(Potdar et al, 2012)
(2 syst reviews: Potdar et al, 2012; El-Toukhy et al, 2013)
Aboubakr Elnashar
21. (A) First, the pipelle sample is inserted until it reaches the fundus.
(B) The inner plunger is withdrawn to apply a suction force to the endometrial cavity.
(C) Endometrial scratch of the superficial layer of the endometrium is performed with
the use of a ‘hoovering’ movement, combining a rotational and in-and-out movement
of the pipelle sampler several times.
Aboubakr Elnashar
22. Mechanisms:
1. Induce decidualization of the endometrium
2. Provoke wound healing, involving secretion
cytokines and growth factors
(Li and Hao, 2009).
3. Recruit stem cells to the endometrium, creating a
partially new endometrium free of epigenetic defects
(Taylor, 2004; Du and Taylor, 2007).
Aboubakr Elnashar
23. 3. Thrombophilia
Thrombophilia: LMWH
Thrombophilic trait: prophylactic dose of LMWH:
improve IVF outcome
(Bohlmann et al, 2011; Qublan et al, 2008).
Antiphospholipid antibody syndrome:
Empirical treatment:
LMWH, aspirin, or corticosteroids:
Not effective
Not advocated
(Seshadri et al, 2011; Berker et al, 2011).
Aboubakr Elnashar
24. 4. Immunotherapy
IVIG
Although data showing some benefit on ART
outcome.
SR does not support
{paucity, or poor quality of, the evidence}.
(SR: Polanski et al, 2014)
Aboubakr Elnashar
26. Intrauterine administration of autologous
peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC)
Freshly isolated from patients: effectively
improves embryo implantation
(Yoshioka et al, 2006; Okitsu et al, 2011 Chen et al, 2011)
{1. Evoke favourable inflammatory reactions :
producing cytokines
2. secrete proteases: regulate endometrial
function}
Aboubakr Elnashar
27. II. Treatment of the embryos
1. Chromosomal abnormality
Preimplantation genetic screening
can clarify the reason for RIF.
(Caglar et al. ,2005)
significantly lowered live birth rates in RIF
(Meta-analysis of RCT, Mastenbroek et al,2011)
does not improve the live birth rates RIF
(ASRM, ESHRE, 2010).
Aboubakr Elnashar
28. 2. Sperm DNA fragmentation
a. Oral antioxidant
reduce the incidence of sperm DNA fragmentation
(Greco et al., 2005 ; Isidori et al., 2006).
Aboubakr Elnashar
29. b. Select spermatozoa with low levels of DNA
damage from the ejaculated semen samples
(Sakkas and Alvarez, 2010).
i. Annexin-V columns:
reduce the percentage of spermatozoa with
DNA fragmentation as measured by the
TUNEL test
ii. Sperm hyaluronic acid binding:
(Jakab et al., 2005; Said et al., 2005, 2006).
iii. Onfocal light absorption scattering
spectroscopy (CLASS) technology
Aboubakr Elnashar
30. iv. Intracytoplasmic morphologically selected
sperm injection (IMSI)
high-magnification microscope (6000x), to identify
spermatozoa devoid of surface vacuoles
(Bartoov et al., 2003).
The only confirmed indication for IMSI is RIF.
(MA: Boitrelle et al, 2014)
Aboubakr Elnashar
31. c. Use of testicular spermatozoa
{sperm DNA damage is lower in the seminiferous
tubules as compared with the cauda epididymis
and ejaculated spermatozoa}
(Greco et al., 2005; Steele et al., 1999; Suganuma et al., 2005)
Significant increase in PR
(Greco et al., 2005b; Weissman et al., 2008)
reduction of miscarriage rate
(Borini et al., 2006)
Aboubakr Elnashar
32. 3. Assisted hatching
Significant increases CPR in RIF
(Three RCTs: Chao et al., 1997; Magli et al., 1998; Nakayama et al.,
1999; Metaanalysis, Martins et al, 2011)
Aboubakr Elnashar
33. 4. Suboptimal culture
a. Co-culture
Homologous endometrial cells
(Jayot et al., 1995; Eyheremendy et al, 2010)
49% PR in RIF.
(Spandorfer et al. ,2004)
Most IVF units do not have facilities and experience
Aboubakr Elnashar
34. b. Blastocyst transfer
Significantly higher CPR
(Guerif et al., 2004; Levitas et al., 2004).
{Improved embryo selection and uterine receptivity}
Aboubakr Elnashar
35. 5. Improving ET
Essential in each cycle and must be reconsidered
in RIF.
Atraumatic, US guided
Embryos deposited in the mid uterine cavity
(Sallam, 2005)
Avoidance of blood, mucus, bacterial
contamination, touching the fundus, and excessive
uterine contractions
Trial transfer, filled bladder, soft catheters
(Schoolcraft et al, 2001)
Aboubakr Elnashar
36. Fibrin glue
doubled CPR in RIF
(Bar-Hava et al. ,1999).
Transfer large number of embryos
significant increase in CPR in RIF
(Azem et al.1995)
No comparative study.
Sequential embryo transfer
Interval double ET (on days 2 and 4 or 5):
improves CPR in RIF
(Loutradis et al, 2004; Almog et al., 2008)
Aboubakr Elnashar
37. Personalized embryo transfer (pET)
ERA test to determine endometrium is receptive
or not)
pET performed on the day designated by the
ERA: 50.0% PR and 38.5% IR
(Ruiz-Alonso et al, 2013).
Aboubakr Elnashar
39. 1. Salpingectomy of hydrosalpinges
CPR and live birth rates: doubled
(Strandell et al., 1999; Cochrane sys rev Johnson et al., 2004).
Aboubakr Elnashar
40. 2. Treating endometriosis
GnRHa for 3–6 months before ART: significantly
increases CPR
(Surrey et al., 2002).
increased CPR by 4-fold
(Sallam et al., 2006).
Endometrioma:
No benefit of removal before IVF
(Garcia-Velasco et al., 2004; Wong et al., 2004),
Surgery ± deleterious for ov reserve.
Aboubakr Elnashar
41. 3. Danazol
significantly increased CPR (40 vs 19.5%)
(Tei et al., 2003).
{Immunosuppressive effects
increase receptivity of the endometrium
upgrade the endometrial αVβ3 integrin.}
(Hill et al., 1987).
Aboubakr Elnashar
42. 4. Tailoring the stimulation protocols
GnRHan protocols:
improved blastocyst quality and pregnancy
outcome after RIF with GnRHa protocols
(Takahashi et al. ;2004).
Aboubakr Elnashar
43. Addition of LH
1. Poor responders to FSH stimulation in down-
regulated cycles
(Phelps et al., 1999; Surrey and Schoolcraft, 2000).
2. Above 35 ys
(Balasch et al., 2001; Marrs et al.,2004; Phelps et al., 1999).
Aboubakr Elnashar
44. Natural cycle
particularly with high uNK cell count
(Kadoch, 2003, Ledee-Bataille et al., 2004).
No RCT to prove that changing any stimulation
protocol can improve treatment outcome.
Aboubakr Elnashar
45. Conclusions
Many known and unknown reasons for RIF, and
we do not have the tools to diagnose in each case
the exact cause.
After failure of 2 or 3 transfers of good-quality
embryos in a unit with CPR of at least 30%, one
should take some special measures.
The management of RIF should be
individualized
multidisciplinary
Aboubakr Elnashar
46. RCT: beneficial
Hysteroscopy procedures
Endometrial injury
IU administration of autologous PBMC
Blastocyst transfer
Assisted hatching
Salpingectomy for tubal disease
Aspirin, heparin, IVIG, intralipid does not have a
clear impact on tt outcome.
Co cultures, sildenafil, transfer of six embryos,
natural IVF, and PGS await further clinical
assessment.
Aboubakr Elnashar