Uploaded byAnthony Smith
Transportation Options for Liberty Village, Toronto
The document outlines transportation options and planning initiatives in Liberty Village, Toronto, including a comprehensive analysis of walkability and existing conditions. It covers policy reviews, historical context, and recommendations for improving transit and infrastructure in the area. Key focus areas include enhancing walkability, connecting cycling infrastructure, and addressing transit crowding and congestion.
Transportation Options for Liberty Village, Toronto
- 1. Mohsen_alavi wayne_woutinho Casey_CraigChris_Erl neil_loewen anthony_smith anthony_sotomayor sonia_tam TRANSPORTATION OPTIONS IN LIBERTY VILLAGE Mohsen alavi wayne coutinho casey craig chris erl sonia tamanthony sotomayoranthony smithneil loewen produced for the City of Toronto
- 2. financial district exhibition place fort york airport queenst dundasst kingst frontst dufferinst whereis liberty village? Right there-ish
- 4. The Building Blocks OurClient: City of Toronto Environment and Energy Piped Services Community Services & Facilities Parks and Public Realm Planning Framework Transportation Networks Garrison Common North Secondary Plan queen rail line bathurst dufferin
- 5. OUR Local studyarea kingst libertyst dufferinst hannahave atlanticAve jeffersonave pardeeave fraserave mowatave gardinerexpressway
- 6. financial district exhibition place fort york airport queenst kingst frontst dufferinst LocalStudy Area + Area of Influence dundasst
- 7. Project Overview recommendations Vision Walkability Audit Moving Parts Network Analysis existing Conditions Policy Review Development History Phase 3:Vision + local design interventions Phase 2: Regional Context Analysis Phase 1: Background Research Opportunities
- 8.
- 9.
- 10.
- 11.
- 12.
- 13.
- 14.
- 15.
- 16.
- 17. CROWDING ON THE KINGSTREETCAR
- 18.
- 19.
- 20.
- 21. Policy Review high level prov& City-wide adjacent neighbourhoods liberty village specific Policy Review
- 22. 2 3 4 5 6 7 employment area preservation parks &open space expansion transit improvements walk/bike Connections Mixed-Use development Infill with Infrastructure 1 reduced congestion modes land uses Policy Review
- 23.
- 28. mode share of worktrips walk: 5% Cycle: 5% TTC: 27% TTC + GO: 10% GO: 3%Auto Passenger: 3% Auto driver: 47%
- 42. $10 $8 $14 $14 $7 $8 $9 $5 $9 $12 $6 $10 $12 $13 $12 $10 $14 $10 $12$14 $12 $8 $12 $7 $7 $7 $6 $4 $8 $8 $11 $11 $29 $6 $9 $6$7 parking rates from 8am-6pm
- 50. 01 Walking Surfaces 02 Lighting 03 Pedestrian Facilities 04 Pedestrian Conflicts 05 Crosswalks 06 Maintenance 07 Path Size 08 Block Length 09 Street Buffer 10 Universal Accessibility 11 Aesthetics 12 Comfort 13 Animation 14 Vegetation 15 Buildings walkability audit questions
- 51. Walkability Score forLiberty Village <50 Walkability Score 70+ 50 60 60 70 walkability audit results
- 52.
- 53.
- 54. Fort York Pedestrian &Cycle Bridge king - liberty ped/cyclist link The king highline funded & unfunded future infrastructure
- 55. project: undergardiner west toronto railpath phase2 west toronto railpath phase 3 funded & unfunded future infrastructure
- 56. go RER Station smarttrack station funded & unfunded future infrastructure
- 57. liberty new street ordnance triangle development funded& unfunded future infrastructure
- 58. king street visioning study funded& unfunded future infrastructure
- 59. proposed cycling infrastructure existing cycling infrastructure funded& unfunded future infrastructure
- 60.
- 61. 1. Incentives toDrive 2. Transit Crowding 3. Low Levels of A.T. Use 4. Car-Human Conflicts 1. Latent Transit Demand 2. creative industries 3. attractive building stock 4. Abundant Soft Sites - +
- 62. NEXT STEPS recommendations Vision Walkability Audit Moving Parts Network Analysis existing Conditions Policy Review Development History Phase 3:Vision + local design interventions Phase 2: Regional Context Analysis Phase 1: Background Research Opportunities
- 67.