Call Girls Ooty Just Call 8250077686 Top Class Call Girl Service Available
LONG TERM TOXICITIES AND QUALITY OF LIFE AFTER RADIATION TO CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM
1.
2. INTRODUCTION
Radiobiological perspective
Acute toxicity: within days to weeks after radiation
Early delayed toxicity : within 1-6 months postirradiation
Late toxicity : >6 months post irradiation
Clinical Perspective : RTOG defined
Acute toxicity : <90 days post radiation
Late toxicity : >90 days post radiation
Front Oncol. 2012; 2: 73.
3. RISK FACTORS FOR LATE CNS TOXICITIES
Volume of normal brain tissue irradiated
The total irradiation dose
The fractionation schedule
The use of concurrent medications
Host variables :
Age
Use of concurrent or sequential chemotherapy
Genetic factors
4. MECHANISMS OF CNS TOXICITY
POST IRRADIATION
Photons to heavy charged particles produce toxicity in CNS
Ionizing particles have physical ability to generate free radicals
that cause direct or indirect DNA damage
CNS is particularly susceptible to metabolic stress
Most accepted mechanism : double stranded DNA damage
leading to mitotic catastrophe
5. But, this mechanism is more relevant in cells undergoing active
cell division
CNS : limited mitotic potential so there is growing evidence to
suggest other mechanisms of radiation induced damage, which
includes
Oxidation of lipid bilayer
Changes in microvascular permeability
Cell-cell junctional complex rearrangements and
Mitochondrial alterations inducing additional oxidative stress
MECHANISMS OF CNS TOXICITY
POST IRRADIATION
6. OXIDATIVE STRESS
Contribute to both acute and chronic radiation injury
They produce Reactive oxygen species (ROS) which have
unpaired electron in shells, which are highly reactive
RADIATION
Hydrolysis of H2O
Increased ROS
RADIATION
Injury and inflammation (injured
endothelial cells, epithelial and
inflammatory cells)
Generation of reactive nitrogen
species (superoxide and nitric oxide )
7. Brain is highly susceptible to oxidative stress because
1. High rate of aerobic glycolysis
(Continual supply of ROS within mitochondria)
2. Relative to other tissue, glial cells and neurons contain
low levels of antioxidant system such as SOD, catalase,
glutathione peroxidase etc
3. Myelin membranes contain high levels of perodizable
fatty acids, making them exceptionally vulnerable to ROS
OXIDATIVE STRESS
8. CHANGES IN MICROVASCULAR
PERMEABILITY
VEGF is the first growth factors upregulated during the
pathogenesis associated with late delayed effects
It is intimately involved in the development of vascular
pathologies and white matter necrosis
9. Brain radiation
Upregulation of VEGF
Gradual depletion of vascular endothelial cells
Diminishes the integrity of BBB
Vasogenic edema, inflammation and tissue
hypoxia
Induction of HIF-1 alpha and VEGF
Exacerbates disruption of BBB, worsening edema,
inflammation and tissue hypoxia
Further increase in VEGF
Induce endothelial proliferation (angiogenesis)
10. Dramatic increase in endothelial cells – k/a
“conditional renewal”
This angiogenic response persists for
approximately 20 weeks
Ultimately fails to restore BBB integrity
Decline in number of endothelial cells
Eventually leading to white matter necrosis
11. THE PARENCHYMAL HYPOTHESIS OF
RADIATION INDUCED BRAIN INJURY
OLIGODENDROCYTES
Radiation
Loss of oligodendrocyte type 2 astrocyte (O-2A)
reproductive capacity
Demyelination and white matter necrosis
12. ASTROCYTES
(50% of total brain cells)
Radiation
Astrocytes – proliferation, hypertropic nuclei/cell
bodies and increased expression of glial fibrillary
acidic protein (GFAP)
Increased COX-2 and ICAM - 1
Aid the infiltration of leucocytes into brain viz BBB
breakdown
13. MICROGLIA
(12 % of total brain cells)
Radiation
Microglia becomes activated, characterized by rounding of
cell body, retraction of cell process and proliferation and
increased production of ROS, cytokines and chemokines
Neuroinflammation
14. NEURONS
Once considered radioresistant population as they no
longer could divide, neurons have now been shown to
respond negatively to radiation
CHANGES IN NEURONS DUE TO RADIATION
Neuronal receptors expression of immediate early gene
activity regulated cytoskeleton associated protein (Arc)
NMDA receptor subunits
Glutaminergic transmission
Hippocampal long term potentiation
Important for synaptic plasticity and cognition
15. CLINICAL MANIFESTATIONS
Acute : 1-6 weeks
Fatigue
Headache
Seizure and
Coma
Cause :
Secondary to
edema and
Disruption of BBB
Front Oncol. 2012
Early delayed
Reversible symptons
Generalized weakness
Somnolence : transient
demyelination
Late
Irreversible neurological
consequences
Minor to sever cognitive defects
focal diffuse necrosis of brain
parenchyma
17. LATE TOXICITIES
Radiation necrosis
Neurocognitive Dysfunction
Endocrinopathies
Cerebrovascular effects
Migraine like headache Syndrome
Effects on the eyes and optic pathways
Ototoxicity
Secondary Tumor Formations
18. RADIATION NECROSIS
Typically develops 1 to 3 years after radiation
Dose that causes 5% of radiation necrosis using conventional 2
Gy/# is usually estimated to be 72 Gy
Increased risk with high dose/# and the use of concurrent
chemotherapy
Location :Adjacent to the original site of tumor
Symtoms
Depend on the location of lesion
Can include focal neurological deficits or symptoms due to
raised ICP
19. DIAGNOSIS: RADIATION NECROSIS
Very difficult with conventional imaging
Imaging features are entirely overlapping with high grade
glioma
However, PWI : decreased CBV : rad necrosis and increased
CBW : tumor
DWI : restricted diffusion : active tumor
MRS : lipid peak : necrosis
PET : increased FDG/methionine : tumor
Ultimate diagnosis : biopsy
23. TREATMENT: RADIATION NECROSIS
Usually it is self limiting process
If symptomatic, steroid, T. Dexa 8 mg tds and the tapering
No respone to steroid : Bevacizumab
• Bevacizumab @ 7.5 mg/kg 3 weekly for 2 cycle
• MRI done, if favourable response further 2 cycles
• And then MRI every 3 monthly for 24 months
• Concluded : bevacizumab stopped the progression of radiation
necrosis
24. Surgical resection if diagnostic uncertainity
Advantage : decreases mass effect
Decreases post op steroid requirements
25. NEUROCOGNITIVE IMPAIRMENT
High dose radiation : demyelination and vasculopathies
Low dose exposure : cognitive dysfunction without obvious
morphologic changes
Exact pathogenesis of radiation induced cognitive dysfunction
is unknown
Recent studies suggest that impaired neurogenesis within the
subgranular zone (SGZ) of the dentate gyrus of hippocampus
WBRT as low as 2 Gy are sufficient to reduce the rate of
proliferation among neuronal progenitor cells within the sub-
granular zone (SGW)
26. NEUROCOGNITIVE IMPAIRMENT
Radiation induced cognitive impairment including
dementia occurs in 50-60% of adult brain tumor patients,
living > 6 months post irradiation
Cognitive impairment is marked by
Decreased verbal memory
Spatial memory
Attention and
Novel problem solving ability
Front Oncol. 2012; 2: 73.
27. Radiation induced cognitive impairment occasionally progress to
dementia where patient experience
Progressive memory loss
Ataxia and
Urinary incontinence
Radiation induced dementia is a rare occurrence with
fraction size < 3 Gy
However patients surviving more then 2 years after
fractionated whole brain irradiation are at increasing risk of
dementia over time
NEUROCOGNITIVE IMPAIRMENT
28. All these late sequel can be seen in the absence of the radiographic
or clinical evidence of demyelination or white matter necrosis
NEUROCOGNITIVE IMPAIRMENT
Front Oncol. 2012; 2: 73.
29. IMAGING FOR RADIATION INDUCED COGNITIVE
IMPAIRMENT
Radiation induced cognitive impairment occur in the absence
of radiographic e/o gross anatomical changes
CT, T1/T2 and MRI are not likely to provide information
relevant to the occurrence and progression of Radiation
induced cognitive impairment.
MRI and PET have been used to evaluate Neurocognitive
impairment
MRS utilizes MR scanner to identify and quantify metabolites
that reflect altered cellular properties in specific region of
normal brain tissue
31. ENDOCRINOPATHIES
Hypothalamic and pituitary endocrinopathies – 80% of
patients post XRT that includes these structures
Dose <20 Gy : may cause endocrinopathies
Abnormal serum hormonal levels long before clinical
symptoms
Screening
Baseline endocrine evaluation in a year of RT
completion and annual blood to screen for HPA
dysfunction
33. PITUITARY INSUFFICIENCY
Prevalence of pituitary failure
6% @ 1 year
35% @ 2 year
56% @ 3 year and
62 % @ 4 and 5 year
GH deficiency occurred at mean of 2.6 year
Failure of pituitary gonadotropin and hyperprolactinemia after 3.8
years
ACTH insufficiency after 6 years and
Finally TSH insufficiency after a mean of 11 years
J LAB CLIN MED 109 : 364 - 372
34. Included
32 pts with brain tumor, 6 to 65 years
f/u – 2 to 13 years, post crainial RT
Dose of radiation : 40 -70 Gy and 9 pts : 18 to 39.6 Gy to C-S axis
Results
Thyroid deficiency : 9 pts, 28%
Oligomenorrhoea : 7/10 postpubertal, premenopausal ladies, 70%
Low serum testosterone, 3/10, 30%
Hyperprolactinemia : 50%
No endocrine abnormality : 3/32, 9%
NEJM 1993
35. CEREBROVASCULAR EFFECTS
Children are more susceptible
Vulnerable sites : supraclinoid region of ICA and Circle of
Willis
Risk factors :
Conc. Chemotherapy
Young age
Radiation dose
Neurofibromatosis I
Radiation field including Circle of willis (>10 Gy)
Prevention
Use of antiplatelet therapy
Management of other Cardiovascular risk factors
36. MIGRAINE LIKE HEADACHE SYNDROME
Reversible syndrome
Focal neurologic signs and/or seizure lasting days to weeks
SMART (Stroke Like Migraine Attacks After Radiatin Therapy)
37. EFFECTS ON THE EYES AND OPTIC PATHWAYS
Cataract
Presents with painless visual impairment 2 to 8 years
following RT
Retrospective studies, TBI done for BMT, 10 Gy/single #
- 60% developed cataract
12 Gy fractionated dose : 43% cataract
Strongly correlated with chronic use of steroids in these
patients
38. Xeropthalmia
If lacrimal gland > 30 Gy
Retinopathy :
Usually presents with painless loss of vision
Months to years post XRT
Unusual, <45 Gy
Optic Neuropathy
Presents with painless mono-ocular or binocular visual
impairment
Usually begin between 6 to 24 months post irradiation
< 55 Gy with 2 Gy/# : unusual
3-7% with 55-60 Gy
7-20% with >60 Gy
39.
40.
41. PREVENTION OF RADIATION INDUCED BRAIN
INJURY
Reducing Oxidative Stress
Reducing Chronic inflammation
Use of Neuronal stem cells
Advanced Radiation Techniques
Pharmacological agents
42. PREVENTION OF RADIATION INDUCED BRAIN
INJURY
Oxidative stress :
Reactive Oxygen Species scavengers
Anti-inflammatory agents
ROS scavengers are given little attention as they are likely to
protect brain tumors to the same extent as they protect
normal brain
43. Anti-inflammatory agents
Anti-inflammatory peroxisome proliferative activated agonists
(PPAR). Eg. Pioglitazone
Preclinical study
Pioglitazone was give 3 days prior to, during and for 4 to 54
weeks after radiation to brain
Assessed cognitve function at 52 weeks : reduced the
radiation-induced cognitive impairment
PREVENTION OF RADIATION INDUCED BRAIN
INJURY
Br.J.Radiol. 2007
44. Chronic inflammation
Brain Renin angiotensin system (RAS) is involved in
modulation of BBB, stress, memory and cognition
Both Angiotensin Converting Enzyme inhibitors (ramipril)
and Angiotensin receptor blocker have been proved
effective in treating experimental radiation neuropathy
(Moulder et al 2003)
45. Neurogenesis
Use of various stem cell therapies to restore neurogenic
niche and improve cognition
Rational :
Radiation
Decreased
hippocampal
neurogenesis
Cognitive impairment
PREVENTION OF RADIATION INDUCED BRAIN
INJURY
46. Direct injection of NSCs into rodent brains after WBI partially
restores neurogenesis and hippocampal dependant cognitive
function
Then NSCs not only diffrentiate into neurons, but also
oligodendrocytes, astrocytes and endothelial cells
Study in human : lacking
PREVENTION OF RADIATION INDUCED BRAIN
INJURY
PROC NATL ACAD SCI USA
2009
47. •Hippocampal avoidance volume : 3.3 cm3
•Helical Tomotherapy spared the hippocampus with median dose
of 5.5 Gy and maximum dose of 12.8 Gy
•Linac based IMRT spared hippocampus with median dose of 7.8
Gy and maximum dose of 15.2 Gy
•Conclusion Modern IMRT techniques allow for sparing of the
hippocampus with acceptable target coverage and homogeneity.
49. USE OF PHARMACOLOGICALAGENTS FOR
RADIATION INDUCED COGNITIVE
IMPAIRMENT
For symptomatic treatment several drugs have been evaluated
Psychostimulants (METHYLPHENIDATE)
Reversible Choline esterase inhibitors (DONEPEZIL)
NMDA receptor antagonist (MEMENTINE)
50. PSYCHOSTIMULANTS
Mechanism of Action : Dopamine reuptake inhibitor
Dose : 10 mg twice a day
Result
Significant improvement in cognitive functions
Functional improvements :
Improved gait
Increased stamina
1 case : increased bladder control
AE were minimal
No increase in seizure frequency and
Majority of patients required lower dose of steroids
51. REVERSIBLE CHOLINE ESTERASE
INHIBITORS
Donepezil
Trial by wake forest community clinical oncology
programme research base
200 brain tumor patients
Surviving > 6 months
Placebo Donepezil 10mg/day for 6
months
Significant improvement in energy
level, mood and cognitive functions
53. TRIAL BY RTOG
Dose : 20 mg/d, within 3 days of initiating
radiotherapy for 24 weeks
Primary end point : memory deficits
No preliminary results
Trial closed after accrual of 554 patients
54. QUALITY OF LIFE (QOL) AFTER CNS
IRRADIATION
Quality of life is a concept that encompasses the
multidimensional well being of a person and reflects an
individual’s overall satisfaction with life.
Dimensions of QOL
1. Physical or functional status
2. Emotional well being
3. Social well being
55. INSTRUMENTS TO MEASURE QOL
Karnofsky performance status (KPS)
Mini Mental Status Examination (MMSE)
Brain tumor specific QoL : commonly measured using the
Funtional Assessment of Cancer Therapy – Brain (FACT-
Br)
EORTC-QLQ-C30
EORTC-QLQ-B20
56. Generally correlates
with overall QoL
Appears to have
prognostic value
KARNOFSKY PERFORMANCE STATUS (KPS)
57. However Using KPS to measure QOL is problematic because
1. it is only a measurement of functional ability and
2. its reliability and validity depend on observer
KARNOFSKY PERFORMANCE STATUS (KPS)
58. To overcome these problems other evlauation scales used
MMSE
Hopkins Visual Learning Test (HVLT)
The COWA test
Trail Making Test (TMT)
RANO criteria
Brain tumor specific QoL : commonly measured using
the Funtional Assessment of Cancer Therapy – Brain
(FACT-Br)
EORTC-QLQ-C30
EORTC-QLQ-B20
QOLASSESSMENT INSTRUMENTS
59. MMSE
Originally designed to assess the stroke patients, has also been
used to assess Neurocognitive Function (NCF) in patients with
brain tumor.
It tests broad range of cognitive function including :
Oreintation
Recall
Attention
Calculation
Language manipulation and
praxis
60.
61. LIMITATIONS OF MMSE
MMSE (Mini mental Status Examination) : validated for
other cognitive disorders and is relatively insensitive for
assessing Radiation induced cognitive impairment.
Limitations of MMSE
a. Does not avoid memorized learning from repeat testing
b. Is biased against patients with lower educational
background
c. Relatively insensitive to the subtle changes in brain
caused by brain radiotherapy
62. Quick, repeatable measure of verbal learning and memory
12 words are spoken aloud to patient from different
category
12 already spoken words and 12 distractor words are
added, requiring yes/no question
(25 minutes later)
HOPKINS VERBAL LEARNING TEST
63. 5-10 minutes test
Measures verbal fluency
It places high demand on executive control process
Patients are given 1 minute to spontaneously name
as many words as possible, beginning with
predetermined letter or same category
THE CONTROLLED ORAL WORD ASSOCIATION
(COWA) TEST
64. THE TRAIL MAKING TEST (TMT) :
Test of executive function, visual attention and task
switching
The time taken to complete each task reveals the extent
of cognitive impairment
GROOVED PEGBOARD TEST (GP) :
Motor speed and dexterity
Meyers et al Proposed a panel involving the HVLT, COWA
and TMT as a brief and highly sensitive test of global NCF
65. RESPONSE ASSESSMENT IN NEUROONCOLOGY
CRITERIA (RANO)
RANO Criteria working group recommended a battery of
cognitive tests that included at least the HVLT, TMT and
multilingual aphasia examination and COWA
66. BRAIN TUMOR SPECIFIC - QOL
Is commonly measured using the functional assessment of
cancer therapy – Brain (FACT – Br) questionnaire
FACT – Br covers four primary QoL domains :-
Physical well being
Social/family well being
Emotional well being
Functional well being
67. ALTERNATIVES MEASURE OF QOL BY EORTC
EORTC – QLQ – C30
30 item questionnaire
Multi item scales incorporating :-
Five functional scales: physical, cognitive, emotional and
social
3 symptoms scales fatigue, pain, nausea and vomiting
A global health and QoL scale
68. Remaining single items : assess for additional symptoms
commonly reported by cancer patients
Dyspnoea
Appetite loss
Sleep disturbance
Constipation and diarrhoea
Perceived financial impact of disease and treatment
69. EORTC – QLQ – B20
20 item questionnaire that is specific to brain related
symptoms
Requires 10 minutes to complete
The EORTC-QLQ-C30 and FACT-Br are the most widely
used cancer specific questionnaires in clinical trials
FACT-Br Vs EORTC-QLQ-C30 :
Social support and
relationship
More weight on social
activities and family life
70. CONCLUSION
Late term toxicities are increasing as survival of brain tumor
patients post radiation is increasing
Once neurons, considered radioresistant, they have been shown
to respond negatively to radiation
With advances in RT techniques and use of pharmacological
geents, there is hope for prevention of neurocognitive
impairment
FACT Br and EORTC QLQ C30 are most widely used QoL
instruments all over the world