SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 12
Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Project Guidelines, v.2
Instructions for Identifying and Extracting Patent Claim Terms and Their Associated Constructions
Connie Godsey-Bell
Global Content and Project Specialist
January 12, 2016
1
Contents
Goal of the Project..................................................................................................................................................................................................................2
How Terms and Constructions are Defined...............................................................................................................................................................................3
Web Site for Final Decisions of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PRPS) ..................................................................................................................................4
How to Locate Informationin PTAB Final Decisions..................................................................................................................................................................4
Examples fromVarious PTAB Decisions....................................................................................................................................................................................7
2
Goal ofthe Project
The goal of the projectis to identify and extract claim terms and constructions (definitions) in Patent Trial and Appeal Board
(PTAB) final decisions.
Note the following points and guidelines:
 The terms, constructions (definitions), and associated metadata will be stored in a centralfile. The data will be used to
facilitate patent research, litigation, and analytics.
 Only the terms construed by Administrative Patent Judges should be included. Terms construed by Patent Examiners
or parties to the case should not be included.
 The following terms, constructions (definitions) and case metadata should be extracted:
Data to be Extracted Example
Term substantially flat
Construction (definition) flat, with any aberration fromflat being limited to a degree
that would not materially affect the relationship of the
container top surfacewith the crests of the first and second
seal rings, such that the firstseal ring will contact the top
surfaceand begin to deformbefore the second seal ring
contacts the top surface
Case name Ex parte TERRY ZEIGLER, ERICELIAS, and CHRISTOPHE
BARREAU
Case number Appeal No. 2013001487
Last name of the Judge who authored the decision Horner
Application number 11/677,643
Patent number 7,104,561
Publication number 20070131408A1
Paragraph In light of Appellant's Specification, we construethe term
"substantially flat" to mean flat, with any aberration from
3
flat being limited to a degree that would not materially
affect the relationship of the container top surfacewith the
crests of the firstand second seal rings, such that the first
seal ring will contact the top surfaceand begin to deform
before the second seal ring contacts the top surface
Standalone term or partof a phrase Part of a phrase
Descriptivemeaning or ordinary Meaning Descriptive
Related terms No examples exist at this time
How Terms and Constructions are Defined
As noted above, the main goal of the projectis to locate the terms and constructions (definitions) thatappear in the PTAB
final decisions. The points below are background information related to terms and constructions.
 Disputesaboutpatentsare broughtbefore the PTAB. The judgesinthe PTABwill make a rulingonthe dispute.
 While decidinghowtorule on the dispute,the PTABjudgesmustoften(butnotalways) define agivenwordorphrase that is usedinthe claimsof the
disputedpatent.
 Words andphrasesusedinthiscontextare called“claimterms”orsimply“terms.” The processof definingthemiscalled“construction.” Thiswordis
derivedfromthe legal word“construe,”whichmeanstointerpret. Therefore,apatenttermconstructionisa legal interpretationof thatterm.
 Some termsconsistof onlyone word,but some termsare phrases. Constructionscanconsistof onlya fewwordsora sentence. Sometimesa
constructionconsistsof a long,complex paragraph. Forexample,atermsuchas “enforcing”mightbe constructedbythe PTAB to mean“a meta-right
meanshavinga repository,basedoninformationwithinthe meta-rightand,optionally,specifiedinone ormore state variablesorconditions,perform
actionsto create,manipulate,modifyorrevoke aderivedmeta-rightora usage right.” It is not unusual toencounteracomplex paragraphasa
constructionof a patentterm.
 Termsand constructionsare oftensurroundedbydouble quotes. The double quotesshouldnotbe includedaspartof the term or construction.
 Notall final decisionswill containtermsandconstructions. Some will containadiscussionof termconstruction,butwill notincludeactual termsand
constructions.If noactual termsare constructed,the word“None”shouldbe enteredinplace of a term.The Constructionfieldshouldbe blank.
4
Structure ofa Final Decision of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board
The Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) final decisions are originally published in PDF formaton the United States Patent
and Trademark Officeweb site called the Patent Review Processing System. Thedecisions are downloaded and formatted for
Lexis on a weekly basis.
Howto Locate Informationin PTAB Final Decisions
1) The example below shows a Lexis version of a PTAB final decision. Information extracted fromthe PDF is indicated in the
comments:
5
2) Terms and constructions may be found throughoutthe decision. The language in which they appear varies. The words
“we construe,” “weinterpret,” or similar language beginning with “we” is a signal that the judges construed a term.
This projectdoes not include terms interpreted, defined, or construed by patent examiners or parties to the case. It
only includes terms construed by judges.
6
3) A reference to a dictionary definition may appear following the term and construction.
7
Examples from Various PTABDecisions
Example 1
8
Example 2. Terms and Constructions are sometimes found embedded in a discussion of a party’s construction. The judges may agree with the
party’s construction. The words “We agree with appellant” can be signal words.
9
Example 3. Terms and Constructions are sometimes found in a list under “Findings of Fact.” When they appear in that location, they are judges’
constructions.
10
Example 4: A discussion of a term may appear in the middle of the text and may refer to earlier text.
Example 5: In this example, the same dictionary reference is used twice. The reference “Id.” Indicates that the same dictionary reference is used
for the term “frustrum” as was used for the term “plug.” The full dictionary reference should be repeated. Do not use the reference “Id.”
11

More Related Content

Viewers also liked

Modulo tecnologia educativa para gestion asimilacion # 2
Modulo tecnologia educativa para gestion asimilacion # 2Modulo tecnologia educativa para gestion asimilacion # 2
Modulo tecnologia educativa para gestion asimilacion # 2Victor Gomez
 
Capacidades Físicas
Capacidades FísicasCapacidades Físicas
Capacidades Físicasjoven10
 
Dia de muertos
Dia de muertosDia de muertos
Dia de muertoskevin
 
Cine sunt utilizatorii online
Cine sunt utilizatorii onlineCine sunt utilizatorii online
Cine sunt utilizatorii onlineCorina Stefan
 
Harold Boigues - A successful Businessman
Harold Boigues - A successful BusinessmanHarold Boigues - A successful Businessman
Harold Boigues - A successful BusinessmanHarold Boigues
 
Rubrica evaluacion a efrain prado
Rubrica evaluacion a efrain pradoRubrica evaluacion a efrain prado
Rubrica evaluacion a efrain pradoEfrain Prado Angulo
 
Nuestro Colegio CEIP Manuel Pacheco
Nuestro Colegio CEIP Manuel PachecoNuestro Colegio CEIP Manuel Pacheco
Nuestro Colegio CEIP Manuel PachecoCeip Manuel Pacheco
 

Viewers also liked (11)

Modulo tecnologia educativa para gestion asimilacion # 2
Modulo tecnologia educativa para gestion asimilacion # 2Modulo tecnologia educativa para gestion asimilacion # 2
Modulo tecnologia educativa para gestion asimilacion # 2
 
Chamsys colout mixing
Chamsys colout mixingChamsys colout mixing
Chamsys colout mixing
 
PLANIFICADOR DE PROYECTOS
PLANIFICADOR DE PROYECTOSPLANIFICADOR DE PROYECTOS
PLANIFICADOR DE PROYECTOS
 
Capacidades Físicas
Capacidades FísicasCapacidades Físicas
Capacidades Físicas
 
Dia de muertos
Dia de muertosDia de muertos
Dia de muertos
 
P
PP
P
 
Cine sunt utilizatorii online
Cine sunt utilizatorii onlineCine sunt utilizatorii online
Cine sunt utilizatorii online
 
Harold Boigues - A successful Businessman
Harold Boigues - A successful BusinessmanHarold Boigues - A successful Businessman
Harold Boigues - A successful Businessman
 
Rubrica evaluacion a efrain prado
Rubrica evaluacion a efrain pradoRubrica evaluacion a efrain prado
Rubrica evaluacion a efrain prado
 
Ada2
Ada2Ada2
Ada2
 
Nuestro Colegio CEIP Manuel Pacheco
Nuestro Colegio CEIP Manuel PachecoNuestro Colegio CEIP Manuel Pacheco
Nuestro Colegio CEIP Manuel Pacheco
 

Similar to Patent Trial and Appeal Board Term Constructions in Final Decisions, v.2, 1-12-2016

2015 09 10 Peter Boase LLM Dissertation.Pdf
2015 09 10 Peter Boase LLM Dissertation.Pdf2015 09 10 Peter Boase LLM Dissertation.Pdf
2015 09 10 Peter Boase LLM Dissertation.PdfLeonard Goudy
 
Non functional requirements framework
Non functional requirements frameworkNon functional requirements framework
Non functional requirements frameworkwweinmeyer79
 
Supply Chain - Post Award Administration
Supply Chain - Post Award AdministrationSupply Chain - Post Award Administration
Supply Chain - Post Award AdministrationJoshua Kuriakose
 
Assignment #1Understanding the Relationships in the.docx
Assignment #1Understanding the Relationships in the.docxAssignment #1Understanding the Relationships in the.docx
Assignment #1Understanding the Relationships in the.docxdavezstarr61655
 
Glossary of terms usa 2014
Glossary of terms usa 2014Glossary of terms usa 2014
Glossary of terms usa 2014bossesco
 
Contract management plan (4156v2)
Contract management plan (4156v2)Contract management plan (4156v2)
Contract management plan (4156v2)SPeters13
 
Guia documentos tipo_obra_publica_-_transporte_
Guia documentos tipo_obra_publica_-_transporte_Guia documentos tipo_obra_publica_-_transporte_
Guia documentos tipo_obra_publica_-_transporte_wellove modeste
 
Qualitative Article CritiqueAssignment Guidelines1. Please k.docx
Qualitative Article CritiqueAssignment Guidelines1. Please k.docxQualitative Article CritiqueAssignment Guidelines1. Please k.docx
Qualitative Article CritiqueAssignment Guidelines1. Please k.docxmakdul
 
The interphase between the english national arbitation laws
The interphase between the english national arbitation lawsThe interphase between the english national arbitation laws
The interphase between the english national arbitation lawsValentine Ataka
 
A Conceptual Framework For B2B Electronic Contracting
A Conceptual Framework For B2B Electronic ContractingA Conceptual Framework For B2B Electronic Contracting
A Conceptual Framework For B2B Electronic ContractingLuisa Polanco
 
Scl delay protocol_2nd_edition_final
Scl delay protocol_2nd_edition_finalScl delay protocol_2nd_edition_final
Scl delay protocol_2nd_edition_finalShardul Tagalpallewar
 
Scl delay protocol_2nd_edition_final
Scl delay protocol_2nd_edition_finalScl delay protocol_2nd_edition_final
Scl delay protocol_2nd_edition_finalengrqasimbutt
 
Ap ar netting topical-essay
Ap ar netting topical-essayAp ar netting topical-essay
Ap ar netting topical-essaySree Kumar S
 
Ironclad or Leaky Sieve
Ironclad or Leaky SieveIronclad or Leaky Sieve
Ironclad or Leaky SieveRob Lindquist
 
Contract management plan (4156v2)
Contract management plan (4156v2)Contract management plan (4156v2)
Contract management plan (4156v2)Shaalan Ettlaib
 
IJIS Institute_ Governance Agreements in PS Information Sharing Projects (Aug...
IJIS Institute_ Governance Agreements in PS Information Sharing Projects (Aug...IJIS Institute_ Governance Agreements in PS Information Sharing Projects (Aug...
IJIS Institute_ Governance Agreements in PS Information Sharing Projects (Aug...Becky Ward
 
IJIS Institute_Critical Decision Criteria for Data Sharing (Jul 2013)
IJIS Institute_Critical Decision Criteria for Data Sharing (Jul 2013)IJIS Institute_Critical Decision Criteria for Data Sharing (Jul 2013)
IJIS Institute_Critical Decision Criteria for Data Sharing (Jul 2013)Becky Ward
 
Jdo 2 0 Edr Spec
Jdo 2 0 Edr SpecJdo 2 0 Edr Spec
Jdo 2 0 Edr Specguest021f78
 
Generative AI and Regulatory Compliance
Generative AI and Regulatory ComplianceGenerative AI and Regulatory Compliance
Generative AI and Regulatory ComplianceDenis Gagné
 
Your Construction Subcontract. The 23 Points That Matter Most
Your Construction Subcontract. The 23 Points That Matter MostYour Construction Subcontract. The 23 Points That Matter Most
Your Construction Subcontract. The 23 Points That Matter MostAlex Barthet
 

Similar to Patent Trial and Appeal Board Term Constructions in Final Decisions, v.2, 1-12-2016 (20)

2015 09 10 Peter Boase LLM Dissertation.Pdf
2015 09 10 Peter Boase LLM Dissertation.Pdf2015 09 10 Peter Boase LLM Dissertation.Pdf
2015 09 10 Peter Boase LLM Dissertation.Pdf
 
Non functional requirements framework
Non functional requirements frameworkNon functional requirements framework
Non functional requirements framework
 
Supply Chain - Post Award Administration
Supply Chain - Post Award AdministrationSupply Chain - Post Award Administration
Supply Chain - Post Award Administration
 
Assignment #1Understanding the Relationships in the.docx
Assignment #1Understanding the Relationships in the.docxAssignment #1Understanding the Relationships in the.docx
Assignment #1Understanding the Relationships in the.docx
 
Glossary of terms usa 2014
Glossary of terms usa 2014Glossary of terms usa 2014
Glossary of terms usa 2014
 
Contract management plan (4156v2)
Contract management plan (4156v2)Contract management plan (4156v2)
Contract management plan (4156v2)
 
Guia documentos tipo_obra_publica_-_transporte_
Guia documentos tipo_obra_publica_-_transporte_Guia documentos tipo_obra_publica_-_transporte_
Guia documentos tipo_obra_publica_-_transporte_
 
Qualitative Article CritiqueAssignment Guidelines1. Please k.docx
Qualitative Article CritiqueAssignment Guidelines1. Please k.docxQualitative Article CritiqueAssignment Guidelines1. Please k.docx
Qualitative Article CritiqueAssignment Guidelines1. Please k.docx
 
The interphase between the english national arbitation laws
The interphase between the english national arbitation lawsThe interphase between the english national arbitation laws
The interphase between the english national arbitation laws
 
A Conceptual Framework For B2B Electronic Contracting
A Conceptual Framework For B2B Electronic ContractingA Conceptual Framework For B2B Electronic Contracting
A Conceptual Framework For B2B Electronic Contracting
 
Scl delay protocol_2nd_edition_final
Scl delay protocol_2nd_edition_finalScl delay protocol_2nd_edition_final
Scl delay protocol_2nd_edition_final
 
Scl delay protocol_2nd_edition_final
Scl delay protocol_2nd_edition_finalScl delay protocol_2nd_edition_final
Scl delay protocol_2nd_edition_final
 
Ap ar netting topical-essay
Ap ar netting topical-essayAp ar netting topical-essay
Ap ar netting topical-essay
 
Ironclad or Leaky Sieve
Ironclad or Leaky SieveIronclad or Leaky Sieve
Ironclad or Leaky Sieve
 
Contract management plan (4156v2)
Contract management plan (4156v2)Contract management plan (4156v2)
Contract management plan (4156v2)
 
IJIS Institute_ Governance Agreements in PS Information Sharing Projects (Aug...
IJIS Institute_ Governance Agreements in PS Information Sharing Projects (Aug...IJIS Institute_ Governance Agreements in PS Information Sharing Projects (Aug...
IJIS Institute_ Governance Agreements in PS Information Sharing Projects (Aug...
 
IJIS Institute_Critical Decision Criteria for Data Sharing (Jul 2013)
IJIS Institute_Critical Decision Criteria for Data Sharing (Jul 2013)IJIS Institute_Critical Decision Criteria for Data Sharing (Jul 2013)
IJIS Institute_Critical Decision Criteria for Data Sharing (Jul 2013)
 
Jdo 2 0 Edr Spec
Jdo 2 0 Edr SpecJdo 2 0 Edr Spec
Jdo 2 0 Edr Spec
 
Generative AI and Regulatory Compliance
Generative AI and Regulatory ComplianceGenerative AI and Regulatory Compliance
Generative AI and Regulatory Compliance
 
Your Construction Subcontract. The 23 Points That Matter Most
Your Construction Subcontract. The 23 Points That Matter MostYour Construction Subcontract. The 23 Points That Matter Most
Your Construction Subcontract. The 23 Points That Matter Most
 

Patent Trial and Appeal Board Term Constructions in Final Decisions, v.2, 1-12-2016

  • 1. Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) Project Guidelines, v.2 Instructions for Identifying and Extracting Patent Claim Terms and Their Associated Constructions Connie Godsey-Bell Global Content and Project Specialist January 12, 2016
  • 2. 1 Contents Goal of the Project..................................................................................................................................................................................................................2 How Terms and Constructions are Defined...............................................................................................................................................................................3 Web Site for Final Decisions of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PRPS) ..................................................................................................................................4 How to Locate Informationin PTAB Final Decisions..................................................................................................................................................................4 Examples fromVarious PTAB Decisions....................................................................................................................................................................................7
  • 3. 2 Goal ofthe Project The goal of the projectis to identify and extract claim terms and constructions (definitions) in Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) final decisions. Note the following points and guidelines:  The terms, constructions (definitions), and associated metadata will be stored in a centralfile. The data will be used to facilitate patent research, litigation, and analytics.  Only the terms construed by Administrative Patent Judges should be included. Terms construed by Patent Examiners or parties to the case should not be included.  The following terms, constructions (definitions) and case metadata should be extracted: Data to be Extracted Example Term substantially flat Construction (definition) flat, with any aberration fromflat being limited to a degree that would not materially affect the relationship of the container top surfacewith the crests of the first and second seal rings, such that the firstseal ring will contact the top surfaceand begin to deformbefore the second seal ring contacts the top surface Case name Ex parte TERRY ZEIGLER, ERICELIAS, and CHRISTOPHE BARREAU Case number Appeal No. 2013001487 Last name of the Judge who authored the decision Horner Application number 11/677,643 Patent number 7,104,561 Publication number 20070131408A1 Paragraph In light of Appellant's Specification, we construethe term "substantially flat" to mean flat, with any aberration from
  • 4. 3 flat being limited to a degree that would not materially affect the relationship of the container top surfacewith the crests of the firstand second seal rings, such that the first seal ring will contact the top surfaceand begin to deform before the second seal ring contacts the top surface Standalone term or partof a phrase Part of a phrase Descriptivemeaning or ordinary Meaning Descriptive Related terms No examples exist at this time How Terms and Constructions are Defined As noted above, the main goal of the projectis to locate the terms and constructions (definitions) thatappear in the PTAB final decisions. The points below are background information related to terms and constructions.  Disputesaboutpatentsare broughtbefore the PTAB. The judgesinthe PTABwill make a rulingonthe dispute.  While decidinghowtorule on the dispute,the PTABjudgesmustoften(butnotalways) define agivenwordorphrase that is usedinthe claimsof the disputedpatent.  Words andphrasesusedinthiscontextare called“claimterms”orsimply“terms.” The processof definingthemiscalled“construction.” Thiswordis derivedfromthe legal word“construe,”whichmeanstointerpret. Therefore,apatenttermconstructionisa legal interpretationof thatterm.  Some termsconsistof onlyone word,but some termsare phrases. Constructionscanconsistof onlya fewwordsora sentence. Sometimesa constructionconsistsof a long,complex paragraph. Forexample,atermsuchas “enforcing”mightbe constructedbythe PTAB to mean“a meta-right meanshavinga repository,basedoninformationwithinthe meta-rightand,optionally,specifiedinone ormore state variablesorconditions,perform actionsto create,manipulate,modifyorrevoke aderivedmeta-rightora usage right.” It is not unusual toencounteracomplex paragraphasa constructionof a patentterm.  Termsand constructionsare oftensurroundedbydouble quotes. The double quotesshouldnotbe includedaspartof the term or construction.  Notall final decisionswill containtermsandconstructions. Some will containadiscussionof termconstruction,butwill notincludeactual termsand constructions.If noactual termsare constructed,the word“None”shouldbe enteredinplace of a term.The Constructionfieldshouldbe blank.
  • 5. 4 Structure ofa Final Decision of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board The Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) final decisions are originally published in PDF formaton the United States Patent and Trademark Officeweb site called the Patent Review Processing System. Thedecisions are downloaded and formatted for Lexis on a weekly basis. Howto Locate Informationin PTAB Final Decisions 1) The example below shows a Lexis version of a PTAB final decision. Information extracted fromthe PDF is indicated in the comments:
  • 6. 5 2) Terms and constructions may be found throughoutthe decision. The language in which they appear varies. The words “we construe,” “weinterpret,” or similar language beginning with “we” is a signal that the judges construed a term. This projectdoes not include terms interpreted, defined, or construed by patent examiners or parties to the case. It only includes terms construed by judges.
  • 7. 6 3) A reference to a dictionary definition may appear following the term and construction.
  • 8. 7 Examples from Various PTABDecisions Example 1
  • 9. 8 Example 2. Terms and Constructions are sometimes found embedded in a discussion of a party’s construction. The judges may agree with the party’s construction. The words “We agree with appellant” can be signal words.
  • 10. 9 Example 3. Terms and Constructions are sometimes found in a list under “Findings of Fact.” When they appear in that location, they are judges’ constructions.
  • 11. 10 Example 4: A discussion of a term may appear in the middle of the text and may refer to earlier text. Example 5: In this example, the same dictionary reference is used twice. The reference “Id.” Indicates that the same dictionary reference is used for the term “frustrum” as was used for the term “plug.” The full dictionary reference should be repeated. Do not use the reference “Id.”
  • 12. 11