Rtpcr
•Download as PPTX, PDF•
0 likes•6 views
The laboratory report summarizes the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a 25-year-old female patient. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real-time PCR test conducted on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. However, the report notes that a negative result does not rule out infection and should be interpreted along with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on COVID-19, the testing method used, and guidelines for interpreting the results.
Report
Share
Report
Share
Recommended
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a 34-year-old male patient. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real-time PCR conducted on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not present in the patient's specimen. However, the report notes that a negative result does not rule out infection completely and should be correlated with the patient's history and clinical presentation. The report provides information on COVID-19, the testing method used, and guidance on interpreting the results.
Rtpcr
A molecular biology report for a COVID-19 test done on a 28-year-old male returned a negative result. The test used a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample tested via real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). A negative result means SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the given specimen, but does not completely rule out infection and should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on corona viruses, the test method, and notes that a single negative test does not exclude infection and repeat sampling is recommended for severe or progressive disease.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test performed on a 26-year-old female patient. The nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab tested negative for SARS-CoV-2 via real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). A negative result does not rule out infection and should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on COVID-19, the testing methodology used, and guidance on interpreting the results. It was authored by two consultant microbiologists.
Rtpcr
A molecular biology report for a patient named Maitreyee Mishra indicates that a SARS-CoV-2 test was performed using a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample and real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) method. The test result was negative, meaning SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the given sample. The report provides information on corona viruses, the test interpretation for positive and negative results, and notes that results should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation. It was signed by two consultant microbiologists.
Rtpcr
A molecular biology report for a COVID-19 test done on a 28-year-old male patient named Mohammed Sabeer T M. The nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab tested negative for SARS-CoV-2 by real time polymerase chain reaction (RTPCR). The test is intended to qualitatively detect the novel coronavirus identified in 2019 in respiratory tract specimens. A negative result does not completely rule out infection and should be correlated with the patient's history and presentation.
Rtpcr
The laboratory report summarizes the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample collected from a 25-year-old male patient. The test was performed using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and yielded a negative result, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. The report provides information on the virus, outlines the implications of positive and negative test results, and notes that results should be interpreted in the clinical context of the patient. It was signed by two consulting microbiologists.
Rtpcr
The laboratory report summarizes a COVID-19 test for a 37-year-old female patient named Nilufar Vanada with visit number V134275. The nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab specimen collected on December 31, 2021 tested negative for SARS-CoV-2 via real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) testing. The report provides information on coronavirus pathogens, interpretation of positive and negative test results, and notes that results should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation. It was signed by two consultant microbiologists.
Rtpcr
The laboratory report summarizes the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a 44-year-old female patient. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real-time PCR conducted on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. However, the report notes that a negative result does not rule out infection and should be interpreted along with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on COVID-19, the testing method used, and guidelines for interpreting the results.
Recommended
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a 34-year-old male patient. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real-time PCR conducted on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not present in the patient's specimen. However, the report notes that a negative result does not rule out infection completely and should be correlated with the patient's history and clinical presentation. The report provides information on COVID-19, the testing method used, and guidance on interpreting the results.
Rtpcr
A molecular biology report for a COVID-19 test done on a 28-year-old male returned a negative result. The test used a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample tested via real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). A negative result means SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the given specimen, but does not completely rule out infection and should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on corona viruses, the test method, and notes that a single negative test does not exclude infection and repeat sampling is recommended for severe or progressive disease.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test performed on a 26-year-old female patient. The nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab tested negative for SARS-CoV-2 via real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). A negative result does not rule out infection and should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on COVID-19, the testing methodology used, and guidance on interpreting the results. It was authored by two consultant microbiologists.
Rtpcr
A molecular biology report for a patient named Maitreyee Mishra indicates that a SARS-CoV-2 test was performed using a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample and real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) method. The test result was negative, meaning SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the given sample. The report provides information on corona viruses, the test interpretation for positive and negative results, and notes that results should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation. It was signed by two consultant microbiologists.
Rtpcr
A molecular biology report for a COVID-19 test done on a 28-year-old male patient named Mohammed Sabeer T M. The nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab tested negative for SARS-CoV-2 by real time polymerase chain reaction (RTPCR). The test is intended to qualitatively detect the novel coronavirus identified in 2019 in respiratory tract specimens. A negative result does not completely rule out infection and should be correlated with the patient's history and presentation.
Rtpcr
The laboratory report summarizes the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample collected from a 25-year-old male patient. The test was performed using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and yielded a negative result, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. The report provides information on the virus, outlines the implications of positive and negative test results, and notes that results should be interpreted in the clinical context of the patient. It was signed by two consulting microbiologists.
Rtpcr
The laboratory report summarizes a COVID-19 test for a 37-year-old female patient named Nilufar Vanada with visit number V134275. The nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab specimen collected on December 31, 2021 tested negative for SARS-CoV-2 via real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) testing. The report provides information on coronavirus pathogens, interpretation of positive and negative test results, and notes that results should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation. It was signed by two consultant microbiologists.
Rtpcr
The laboratory report summarizes the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a 44-year-old female patient. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real-time PCR conducted on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. However, the report notes that a negative result does not rule out infection and should be interpreted along with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on COVID-19, the testing method used, and guidelines for interpreting the results.
Rtpcr
The laboratory report summarizes the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a nasal/oropharyngeal swab sample collected from a 29-year-old male patient named Ashique Bemishal with visit number V134270. The test was performed using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and reported a negative result, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. The report provides information on the testing method, interpretation of results, and notes that a single negative test does not rule out infection and results should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation.
Rtpcr
A molecular biology report for a patient named Zamiya Nafis shows the results of a COVID-19 test using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The test was performed on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab specimen and was negative for SARS-CoV-2. A negative result does not rule out infection and should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on corona viruses, the test methodology, and interpretation of positive and negative results.
Rtpcr
A molecular biology report for a patient named Mohammad Lisan Ali shows that a SARS-CoV-2 test of their nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample returned a negative result. The test used was a qualitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test intended to detect the novel coronavirus responsible for COVID-19. A negative result means that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample but does not completely rule out infection and should be interpreted along with clinical history and presentation. The report was signed by two consultant microbiologists.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a 57-year-old male patient. The nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab was collected on December 30, 2021 and tested using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's specimen. However, the report notes that a negative result does not rule out infection and should be interpreted along with the patient's clinical history and presentation.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a patient. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real-time PCR test performed on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab specimen. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's specimen. However, the report notes that a negative result does not rule out infection and should be considered along with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on COVID-19, the testing method used, and interpretations of positive and negative results.
Rtpcr
The laboratory report provides the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a patient. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real-time PCR test on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab specimen. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's specimen. Additional information is provided on the pathogen, interpretation of positive and negative results, and notes on testing and interpretation guidance.
Rtpcr
The laboratory report summarizes the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample collected from a 25-year-old female patient. The test was performed using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and yielded a negative result, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. The report provides information on the virus, outlines the implications of positive and negative test results, and notes that results should be interpreted in the clinical context of the patient. It was signed by two consulting microbiologists.
Rtpcr
- The laboratory report is for a COVID-19 test done on a 29-year-old male patient named Ashique Bemishal P V.
- The SARS-CoV-2 test done on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample came back negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 RNA was not present in the sample.
- A negative test result does not rule out infection completely and should be correlated with the patient's history and clinical presentation. The test was intended to qualitatively detect the novel coronavirus responsible for COVID-19.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report provides the results of a COVID-19 test done on a patient. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real-time PCR test done on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. The report explains that a negative result does not completely rule out infection and should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation. It also provides background information on corona viruses and the test method used.
Rtpcr
A laboratory report for a patient named Mohammed Rameez M summarizes the results of a COVID-19 test using a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample. The test was a qualitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test reported on November 28, 2021. The test result was SARS-COV2 NEGATIVE, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the given sample. The report provides information on the pathogen, interpretation of positive and negative results, and notes that results should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation.
Rtpcr
The laboratory report summarizes the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a 35-year-old male patient. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real-time PCR test on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. A negative result does not rule out infection and should be interpreted along with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on COVID-19, the testing method used, and guidelines for interpreting the results.
Rtpcr
A molecular biology report for a COVID-19 test done on a 32-year-old male patient named Sharique Pandial shows a negative result for SARS-CoV-2. The nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample was tested using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). A negative result indicates that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample but does not completely rule out infection and should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on coronavirus, the test method, result interpretation, and is signed by two consultant microbiologists.
Rtpcr
A laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a 36-year-old male patient. The nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample was tested using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and the result was reported as SARS-COV2 NEGATIVE. The report provides information on the pathogen, interpretation of positive and negative test results, and notes that results should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation. It was signed by two consultant microbiologists.
Rtpcr
1) A nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab was collected from a 26-year-old male patient and tested for SARS-CoV-2 using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR).
2) The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's specimen.
3) A negative result does not rule out infection and should be interpreted along with the patient's clinical history and presentation.
Rtpcr 210906183229
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test done on a patient. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real-time PCR done on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. The report provides information on the test method, pathogen details, and interpretations for positive and negative results. It concludes that the results only apply to the samples tested and should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report summarizes the results of a COVID-19 test performed on a patient. The test was a qualitative real-time PCR test performed on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. However, the report notes that a negative result does not rule out infection and should be considered along with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on COVID-19 and the test methodology. It is signed by two consulting microbiologists.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a 46-year-old male patient. The nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample was tested using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and the result was SARS-COV2 NEGATIVE. A negative result indicates that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample but does not rule out infection. The test is intended to qualitatively detect the novel coronavirus responsible for COVID-19 in respiratory tract samples.
Rtpcr
A nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab was collected from Sooraj Govindan, a 31-year old male, and tested for SARS-CoV-2 using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the given sample. However, the result should be interpreted in the context of the patient's clinical history and exposure risks, as a false negative is possible. The report provides information on COVID-19 and the testing methodology used.
Rtpcr
A laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test done on a 40-year-old male patient. The test was done on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample collected on November 27, 2021 and reported on November 28, 2021. The test result was SARS-COV2 NEGATIVE, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. However, the report notes that a negative result does not rule out infection and should be interpreted along with the patient's clinical history and presentation.
Rtpcr
A molecular biology report for a patient named Jumaan Muzian summarizes the results of a COVID-19 test using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The test was performed on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample collected from the patient and tested negative for SARS-CoV-2. The report provides information on coronavirus pathogens, interpreting positive and negative test results, and notes that results should be considered with the patient's clinical history and exposure risks. It was signed by two consulting microbiologists.
Rtpcr
A molecular biology report for a 45-year-old female patient named Aisha Farzana showed a SARS-CoV-2 test result that was negative. The test was performed using a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample analyzed with real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). A negative result means that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's specimen, but does not completely rule out infection and should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report was signed by two consultant microbiologists.
Rtpcr
The laboratory report summarizes the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample collected from a 25-year-old female patient. The test was performed using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and yielded a negative result, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. The report provides information on the virus, outlines the implications of positive and negative test results, and notes that results should be interpreted in the clinical context of the patient. It was signed by two consulting microbiologists.
More Related Content
What's hot
Rtpcr
The laboratory report summarizes the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a nasal/oropharyngeal swab sample collected from a 29-year-old male patient named Ashique Bemishal with visit number V134270. The test was performed using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and reported a negative result, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. The report provides information on the testing method, interpretation of results, and notes that a single negative test does not rule out infection and results should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation.
Rtpcr
A molecular biology report for a patient named Zamiya Nafis shows the results of a COVID-19 test using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The test was performed on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab specimen and was negative for SARS-CoV-2. A negative result does not rule out infection and should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on corona viruses, the test methodology, and interpretation of positive and negative results.
Rtpcr
A molecular biology report for a patient named Mohammad Lisan Ali shows that a SARS-CoV-2 test of their nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample returned a negative result. The test used was a qualitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test intended to detect the novel coronavirus responsible for COVID-19. A negative result means that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample but does not completely rule out infection and should be interpreted along with clinical history and presentation. The report was signed by two consultant microbiologists.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a 57-year-old male patient. The nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab was collected on December 30, 2021 and tested using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's specimen. However, the report notes that a negative result does not rule out infection and should be interpreted along with the patient's clinical history and presentation.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a patient. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real-time PCR test performed on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab specimen. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's specimen. However, the report notes that a negative result does not rule out infection and should be considered along with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on COVID-19, the testing method used, and interpretations of positive and negative results.
Rtpcr
The laboratory report provides the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a patient. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real-time PCR test on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab specimen. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's specimen. Additional information is provided on the pathogen, interpretation of positive and negative results, and notes on testing and interpretation guidance.
Rtpcr
The laboratory report summarizes the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample collected from a 25-year-old female patient. The test was performed using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and yielded a negative result, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. The report provides information on the virus, outlines the implications of positive and negative test results, and notes that results should be interpreted in the clinical context of the patient. It was signed by two consulting microbiologists.
Rtpcr
- The laboratory report is for a COVID-19 test done on a 29-year-old male patient named Ashique Bemishal P V.
- The SARS-CoV-2 test done on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample came back negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 RNA was not present in the sample.
- A negative test result does not rule out infection completely and should be correlated with the patient's history and clinical presentation. The test was intended to qualitatively detect the novel coronavirus responsible for COVID-19.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report provides the results of a COVID-19 test done on a patient. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real-time PCR test done on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. The report explains that a negative result does not completely rule out infection and should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation. It also provides background information on corona viruses and the test method used.
Rtpcr
A laboratory report for a patient named Mohammed Rameez M summarizes the results of a COVID-19 test using a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample. The test was a qualitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test reported on November 28, 2021. The test result was SARS-COV2 NEGATIVE, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the given sample. The report provides information on the pathogen, interpretation of positive and negative results, and notes that results should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation.
Rtpcr
The laboratory report summarizes the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a 35-year-old male patient. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real-time PCR test on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. A negative result does not rule out infection and should be interpreted along with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on COVID-19, the testing method used, and guidelines for interpreting the results.
Rtpcr
A molecular biology report for a COVID-19 test done on a 32-year-old male patient named Sharique Pandial shows a negative result for SARS-CoV-2. The nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample was tested using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). A negative result indicates that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample but does not completely rule out infection and should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on coronavirus, the test method, result interpretation, and is signed by two consultant microbiologists.
Rtpcr
A laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a 36-year-old male patient. The nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample was tested using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and the result was reported as SARS-COV2 NEGATIVE. The report provides information on the pathogen, interpretation of positive and negative test results, and notes that results should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation. It was signed by two consultant microbiologists.
Rtpcr
1) A nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab was collected from a 26-year-old male patient and tested for SARS-CoV-2 using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR).
2) The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's specimen.
3) A negative result does not rule out infection and should be interpreted along with the patient's clinical history and presentation.
Rtpcr 210906183229
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test done on a patient. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real-time PCR done on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. The report provides information on the test method, pathogen details, and interpretations for positive and negative results. It concludes that the results only apply to the samples tested and should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report summarizes the results of a COVID-19 test performed on a patient. The test was a qualitative real-time PCR test performed on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. However, the report notes that a negative result does not rule out infection and should be considered along with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on COVID-19 and the test methodology. It is signed by two consulting microbiologists.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a 46-year-old male patient. The nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample was tested using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and the result was SARS-COV2 NEGATIVE. A negative result indicates that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample but does not rule out infection. The test is intended to qualitatively detect the novel coronavirus responsible for COVID-19 in respiratory tract samples.
Rtpcr
A nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab was collected from Sooraj Govindan, a 31-year old male, and tested for SARS-CoV-2 using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the given sample. However, the result should be interpreted in the context of the patient's clinical history and exposure risks, as a false negative is possible. The report provides information on COVID-19 and the testing methodology used.
Rtpcr
A laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test done on a 40-year-old male patient. The test was done on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample collected on November 27, 2021 and reported on November 28, 2021. The test result was SARS-COV2 NEGATIVE, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. However, the report notes that a negative result does not rule out infection and should be interpreted along with the patient's clinical history and presentation.
Rtpcr
A molecular biology report for a patient named Jumaan Muzian summarizes the results of a COVID-19 test using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The test was performed on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample collected from the patient and tested negative for SARS-CoV-2. The report provides information on coronavirus pathogens, interpreting positive and negative test results, and notes that results should be considered with the patient's clinical history and exposure risks. It was signed by two consulting microbiologists.
Similar to Rtpcr
Rtpcr
A molecular biology report for a 45-year-old female patient named Aisha Farzana showed a SARS-CoV-2 test result that was negative. The test was performed using a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample analyzed with real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). A negative result means that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's specimen, but does not completely rule out infection and should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report was signed by two consultant microbiologists.
Rtpcr
The laboratory report summarizes the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample collected from a 25-year-old female patient. The test was performed using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and yielded a negative result, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. The report provides information on the virus, outlines the implications of positive and negative test results, and notes that results should be interpreted in the clinical context of the patient. It was signed by two consulting microbiologists.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a patient sample. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real-time PCR test. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample. The report provides background information on corona viruses and the test methodology. It notes that a negative result does not rule out infection and should be interpreted along with the patient's clinical history and presentation.
Rtpcr
- The laboratory report is for a COVID-19 test done on a 29-year-old male patient named Ashique Bemishal P V.
- The SARS-CoV-2 test done on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample came back negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 RNA was not present in the sample.
- A negative test result does not rule out infection completely and should be correlated with the patient's history and clinical presentation. The test was intended to qualitatively detect the novel coronavirus responsible for COVID-19.
Rtpcr 21093004140-211003083745-211010114407
A COVID-19 test was performed on a 20-year-old female patient. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) performed on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab specimen. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's specimen. However, a negative result does not rule out infection and should be interpreted along with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on COVID-19, the testing method used, and guidance on interpreting the test results.
Rtpcr
The laboratory report summarizes a COVID-19 test for a 22-year-old male patient. The test was performed on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample collected on December 24, 2021 and reported on December 25, 2021. The test result was SARS-COV2 negative, indicating that the virus was not detected in the patient's sample. The report provides information on the test method used, pathogen details, and interpretations for positive and negative results.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a 48-year-old female patient. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real-time PCR conducted on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's specimen. However, the report notes that a negative result does not rule out infection and should be interpreted along with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on COVID-19, the testing methodology used, and guidelines for interpreting the results. It is signed by two consultant microbiologists.
Rtpcr
The laboratory report provides the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a sample from Sharique Muhammed Pandial, a 32-year-old male. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 Detection by Real Time Polymerase Chain Reaction (RTPCR) conducted on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. The report also provides information on the pathogen, interpretation of positive and negative results, and notes from the interpreting microbiologists.
Rtpcr
1) The patient underwent COVID-19 testing via nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab and real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR).
2) The test results were negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's specimen.
3) A negative test result does not rule out infection and should be considered along with the patient's clinical history and presentation.
Rtpcr
A molecular biology report for a patient named Thamam Shuhshad summarizes the results of a COVID-19 test using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The test results for a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab specimen were negative for SARS-CoV-2. A negative result does not rule out infection and should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on coronavirus pathogens and interpreting positive and negative test results.
Rtpcr
A laboratory report dated 08/01/2022 provides the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a sample from Fathimat U Shamna, a 25-year-old female. The SARS-CoV-2 test was conducted using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. However, the report notes that a negative result does not rule out infection and should be interpreted along with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report was signed by two consultant microbiologists.
Rtpcr 21093004140-211003083745-211010114407-211020103052
A molecular biology report for a 26-year-old female patient named Ayishath Shafeeda K A showed a negative result for SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real-time PCR. The nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab specimen was tested using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RTPCR). A negative result indicates that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's specimen, but does not completely rule out infection and should be correlated with the patient's history and clinical presentation. The report provides information on corona viruses, the test interpretation, and is signed by two consultant microbiologists.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a 32-year-old male patient. The nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab tested negative for SARS-CoV-2 via real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The report provides background on corona viruses, interpretation of positive and negative test results, and notes that results should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation. It was signed by two consultant microbiologists.
Rtpcr
A molecular biology report for a COVID-19 test done on a 28-year-old male. The test was done on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample collected on 20/10/2021 and reported on 21/10/2021. The test result was SARS-COV2 NEGATIVE, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the given sample. The report provides information on the test method used, pathogen details, and interpretations for positive and negative results. It concludes that the results only apply to the samples tested and should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a 53-year-old male patient. The nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample was tested using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and the result was SARS-COV2 NEGATIVE. The report provides information on corona viruses, the test methodology used, and interpretations for positive and negative test results which should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report was signed by two consultant microbiologists.
Rtpcr 210906183229-210909100838
A nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab was collected from Saifudeen K H, a 26 year old male, and tested for SARS-CoV-2 using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's specimen. However, a negative result does not rule out infection and should be interpreted along with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on COVID-19, the testing method used, and guidance on interpreting negative and positive test results.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test done on a patient named Rifa Rahman Pandial. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real-time PCR done on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. The report provides information on the test method, pathogen details, and interpretations for positive and negative results. It was signed by two consulting microbiologists.
Rtpcr
A nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab was collected from 21-year-old female patient Mariyam Shabna and tested for COVID-19 using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's specimen. However, the result should be interpreted in the context of the patient's clinical history and presentation, as a false negative is possible due to improper sample collection, transport, or handling. The report provides information on corona viruses, the test methodology, and guidance on interpreting negative and positive test results.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a patient. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real-time PCR test conducted on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab specimen. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's specimen. However, the report notes that a negative result does not rule out infection and should be considered along with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on COVID-19, the testing method used, and interpretations of positive and negative results.
Similar to Rtpcr (19)
Rtpcr 21093004140-211003083745-211010114407-211020103052
Rtpcr 21093004140-211003083745-211010114407-211020103052
More from Care Reference Laboratory
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test performed on a patient sample. The test was a qualitative real-time PCR test performed on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample. The test result was SARS-CoV-2 negative, indicating that the virus was not detected in the patient's sample. The report provides information on coronavirus pathogens, outlines the implications of positive and negative test results, and notes that test results should be interpreted in the clinical context of the patient. It was signed by two consulting microbiologists.
Certificate
This certificate confirms Saniya Bi Shaikh received two doses of the COVISHIELD COVID-19 vaccine. She received her first dose on August 3, 2021 from batch 4121Z088 and her second dose on October 30, 2021 from batch 4121Z105 at the Ponda PHC Satellite Centre in South Goa, Goa. The certificate can be verified online and contains contact information for reporting any adverse events.
Certificate
This certificate confirms that Saniya Bi Shaikh, an 18-year-old female, received the first dose of the COVISHIELD COVID-19 vaccine on July 3, 2021 and the second dose on September 30, 2021 at the Ponda PHC Satellite Centre in South Goa, Goa. The certificate can be verified online and lists contact information for reporting any adverse events.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report summarizes the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample collected from a patient named Jawad Rahees. The test was performed using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and yielded a negative result, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. The report provides information on coronavirus pathogens, outlines the implications of positive and negative test results, and notes that test results should be interpreted in the clinical context of the patient. It was authored by two consultant microbiologists.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a patient sample. The test was for SARS-CoV-2 detection using real-time PCR and was performed on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. The report provides information on coronavirus types, test interpretation, and notes that a negative result does not rule out infection and should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation. It was signed by two consultant microbiologists.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test performed on a patient sample collected on April 2, 2022. The SARS-CoV-2 test result for the patient identified as Mohammed Rameez M was negative. The test was performed using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab specimen. A negative result indicates that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample but does not rule out infection, and the result should be interpreted in the clinical context. The report was signed by two consulting microbiologists.
Rtpcr
The laboratory report summarizes the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a 29-year-old male patient. The test was performed on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample collected on 04/02/2022. The test result was SARS-COV2 NEGATIVE, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. The report provides information on the virus, testing method used, implications of positive and negative results, and notes that the results should be interpreted in the clinical context of the patient. It was signed by two consultant microbiologists.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test using a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample from patient Mohammed Ishak B A. The test was a qualitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) test performed on April 2, 2022. The test result was SARS-COV2 NEGATIVE, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the given sample. The report provides information on coronavirus types, test interpretation, and notes that a negative result does not rule out infection and should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation. It was signed by two consultant microbiologists.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test performed on a 24-year-old female patient. The nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab tested negative for SARS-CoV-2 via real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). A negative result indicates that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample but does not rule out infection, as the test has limitations. The report provides information on COVID-19, the testing method used, and guidance on interpreting the negative results in the context of the patient's clinical presentation and history.
Rtpcr
A laboratory report for a patient named Nidhi Subash shows the results of a COVID-19 test. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real-time PCR test performed on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab specimen. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the given sample. A negative result does not rule out infection and should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation. The report provides information on COVID-19 and the test methodology. It is signed by two consulting microbiologists.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report summarizes the results of a COVID-19 test conducted on a sample collected from Mohammed Rafeeq Marathanadi. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real time PCR test. The test result was positive, indicating the presence of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in the nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample. A positive result suggests a diagnosis of COVID-19, though the result should be considered with the patient's clinical history and exposure risks. The report provides information on corona viruses, the test methodology, and guidance on interpreting the results.
Rtpcr
The laboratory report summarizes the results of a COVID-19 test done on a sample from Ashthaf Ali C. The test was done using real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) and the result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the sample. The report provides information on the virus, outlines how to interpret positive and negative results, and notes that results should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation. It was signed by two consultant microbiologists.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test done on a patient sample. The test was for SARS-CoV-2 detection using real-time PCR analysis. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample. The report provides information on the test methodology, pathogen details, and interpretations for positive and negative results. It concludes by noting the results only apply to the samples tested and should be considered with the patient's clinical presentation.
Rtpcr
The laboratory report summarizes a COVID-19 test for a 56-year-old male patient. The test was performed on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample collected on January 24, 2022 and reported on January 24, 2022. The test result was SARS-COV2 NEGATIVE, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. However, the report notes that a negative result does not rule out infection and should be interpreted along with the patient's clinical history and presentation.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test done on a patient sample. The test was a SARS-CoV-2 detection by qualitative real-time PCR test. The test result was negative, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample. The report provides information on the patient, test method, pathogen details, interpretation of positive and negative results, and notes on result correlation with clinical findings. It was signed by two consultant microbiologists.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test done on a patient named Thaseena. The test was done using a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample collected on an unspecified date. The test result was SARS-COV2 NEGATIVE, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. Additional information provided includes details on the testing methodology used, interpretation of positive and negative results, and notes on testing limitations and the need to correlate results with clinical findings. The report was signed by two consulting microbiologists.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report details the results of a COVID-19 test done on a patient named Thaseena. The test was done using a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample collected on an unspecified date. The test result was SARS-COV2 NEGATIVE, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. Additional information provided includes details on the testing methodology used, interpretation of positive and negative results, and notes on testing limitations and the need to correlate results with clinical findings. The report was signed by two consulting microbiologists.
Rtpcr
A laboratory report summarizes the results of a COVID-19 test done on a patient. The test was done on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample collected on 20/12/2021. The test result was SARS-COV2 NEGATIVE, indicating that SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in the patient's sample. The report provides information on the test method used, the coronavirus tested for, and interpretations for positive and negative results. It concludes by noting the results only apply to the samples tested and should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation.
Rtpcr
This laboratory report summarizes the results of a COVID-19 test. The test on a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab sample from patient C K Wasiq was negative for SARS-CoV-2. The report provides background on corona viruses, interpretation of positive and negative test results, and notes that results should be considered with the patient's clinical history and presentation. It was signed by two consultant microbiologists.
Nidhi subash rtpcr
This document is a lab report for a COVID-19 RT-PCR test. It indicates that the test for the sample from Miss. Nidhi Subash, a 24-year-old female, came back negative for SARS-CoV-2 RNA. The test was performed at Sankar's Healthcare Scans and Diagnostics in Alappuzha, Kerala, India and analyzed samples from a nasopharyngeal/oropharyngeal swab using real-time RT-PCR. The report provides background on SARS-CoV-2 and the test methodology, and notes that a negative result does not rule out infection and should be interpreted along with clinical observations.
More from Care Reference Laboratory (20)
Recently uploaded
Hiranandani Hospital Powai News [Read Now].pdf
Hiranandani Hospital in Powai, Mumbai, is a premier healthcare institution that has been serving the community with exceptional medical care since its establishment. As a part of the renowned Hiranandani Group, the hospital is committed to delivering world-class healthcare services across a wide range of specialties, including kidney transplantation. With its state-of-the-art facilities, advanced medical technology, and a team of highly skilled healthcare professionals, Hiranandani Hospital has earned a reputation as a trusted name in the healthcare industry. The hospital's patient-centric approach, coupled with its focus on innovation and excellence, ensures that patients receive the highest standard of care in a compassionate and supportive environment.
pathology MCQS introduction to pathology general pathology
pathology MCQS introduction to pathology general pathology
REGULATION FOR COMBINATION PRODUCTS AND MEDICAL DEVICES.pptx
It includes regulation of combination products and medical devices. FDA and industry liaisons.
8 Surprising Reasons To Meditate 40 Minutes A Day That Can Change Your Life.pptx
8 Surprising Reasons To Meditate 40 Minutes A Day That Can Change Your Life.pptxHolistified Wellness
We’re talking about Vedic Meditation, a form of meditation that has been around for at least 5,000 years. Back then, the people who lived in the Indus Valley, now known as India and Pakistan, practised meditation as a fundamental part of daily life. This knowledge that has given us yoga and Ayurveda, was known as Veda, hence the name Vedic. And though there are some written records, the practice has been passed down verbally from generation to generation.Cell Therapy Expansion and Challenges in Autoimmune Disease
There is increasing confidence that cell therapies will soon play a role in the treatment of autoimmune disorders, but the extent of this impact remains to be seen. Early readouts on autologous CAR-Ts in lupus are encouraging, but manufacturing and cost limitations are likely to restrict access to highly refractory patients. Allogeneic CAR-Ts have the potential to broaden access to earlier lines of treatment due to their inherent cost benefits, however they will need to demonstrate comparable or improved efficacy to established modalities.
In addition to infrastructure and capacity constraints, CAR-Ts face a very different risk-benefit dynamic in autoimmune compared to oncology, highlighting the need for tolerable therapies with low adverse event risk. CAR-NK and Treg-based therapies are also being developed in certain autoimmune disorders and may demonstrate favorable safety profiles. Several novel non-cell therapies such as bispecific antibodies, nanobodies, and RNAi drugs, may also offer future alternative competitive solutions with variable value propositions.
Widespread adoption of cell therapies will not only require strong efficacy and safety data, but also adapted pricing and access strategies. At oncology-based price points, CAR-Ts are unlikely to achieve broad market access in autoimmune disorders, with eligible patient populations that are potentially orders of magnitude greater than the number of currently addressable cancer patients. Developers have made strides towards reducing cell therapy COGS while improving manufacturing efficiency, but payors will inevitably restrict access until more sustainable pricing is achieved.
Despite these headwinds, industry leaders and investors remain confident that cell therapies are poised to address significant unmet need in patients suffering from autoimmune disorders. However, the extent of this impact on the treatment landscape remains to be seen, as the industry rapidly approaches an inflection point.
The Electrocardiogram - Physiologic Principles
These lecture slides, by Dr Sidra Arshad, offer a quick overview of the physiological basis of a normal electrocardiogram.
Learning objectives:
1. Define an electrocardiogram (ECG) and electrocardiography
2. Describe how dipoles generated by the heart produce the waveforms of the ECG
3. Describe the components of a normal electrocardiogram of a typical bipolar lead (limb II)
4. Differentiate between intervals and segments
5. Enlist some common indications for obtaining an ECG
6. Describe the flow of current around the heart during the cardiac cycle
7. Discuss the placement and polarity of the leads of electrocardiograph
8. Describe the normal electrocardiograms recorded from the limb leads and explain the physiological basis of the different records that are obtained
9. Define mean electrical vector (axis) of the heart and give the normal range
10. Define the mean QRS vector
11. Describe the axes of leads (hexagonal reference system)
12. Comprehend the vectorial analysis of the normal ECG
13. Determine the mean electrical axis of the ventricular QRS and appreciate the mean axis deviation
14. Explain the concepts of current of injury, J point, and their significance
Study Resources:
1. Chapter 11, Guyton and Hall Textbook of Medical Physiology, 14th edition
2. Chapter 9, Human Physiology - From Cells to Systems, Lauralee Sherwood, 9th edition
3. Chapter 29, Ganong’s Review of Medical Physiology, 26th edition
4. Electrocardiogram, StatPearls - https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK549803/
5. ECG in Medical Practice by ABM Abdullah, 4th edition
6. Chapter 3, Cardiology Explained, https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK2214/
7. ECG Basics, http://www.nataliescasebook.com/tag/e-c-g-basics
Ketone bodies and metabolism-biochemistry
This slide consists of all the topics of ketone . This can be used for exam purpose for writing about Diabetic keto acidosis etc . Thank you
Identifying Major Symptoms of Slip Disc.
Our backs are like superheroes, holding us up and helping us move around. But sometimes, even superheroes can get hurt. That’s where slip discs come in.
NARCOTICS- POLICY AND PROCEDURES FOR ITS USE
This document outlines policies and procedures for handling narcotic and controlled drugs in NABH accredited hospitals.
All info about Diabetes and how to control it.
One health condition that is becoming more common day by day is diabetes.
According to research conducted by the National Family Health Survey of India, diabetic cases show a projection which might increase to 10.4% by 2030.
Journal Article Review on Rasamanikya
Rasamanikya is a excellent preparation in the field of Rasashastra, it is used in various Kushtha Roga, Shwasa, Vicharchika, Bhagandara, Vatarakta, and Phiranga Roga. In this article Preparation& Comparative analytical profile for both Formulationon i.e Rasamanikya prepared by Kushmanda swarasa & Churnodhaka Shodita Haratala. The study aims to provide insights into the comparative efficacy and analytical aspects of these formulations for enhanced therapeutic outcomes.
Post-Menstrual Smell- When to Suspect Vaginitis.pptx
Do you have abnormal smell after periods? It may be vaginitis. Do not worry, herbal medicine Fuyan Pill can help you get a cure.
Recently uploaded (20)
pathology MCQS introduction to pathology general pathology
pathology MCQS introduction to pathology general pathology
Ear and its clinical correlations By Dr. Rabia Inam Gandapore.pptx
Ear and its clinical correlations By Dr. Rabia Inam Gandapore.pptx
REGULATION FOR COMBINATION PRODUCTS AND MEDICAL DEVICES.pptx
REGULATION FOR COMBINATION PRODUCTS AND MEDICAL DEVICES.pptx
Vestibulocochlear Nerve by Dr. Rabia Inam Gandapore.pptx
Vestibulocochlear Nerve by Dr. Rabia Inam Gandapore.pptx
8 Surprising Reasons To Meditate 40 Minutes A Day That Can Change Your Life.pptx
8 Surprising Reasons To Meditate 40 Minutes A Day That Can Change Your Life.pptx
Cell Therapy Expansion and Challenges in Autoimmune Disease
Cell Therapy Expansion and Challenges in Autoimmune Disease
Post-Menstrual Smell- When to Suspect Vaginitis.pptx
Post-Menstrual Smell- When to Suspect Vaginitis.pptx
CHEMOTHERAPY_RDP_CHAPTER 6_Anti Malarial Drugs.pdf
CHEMOTHERAPY_RDP_CHAPTER 6_Anti Malarial Drugs.pdf
Rtpcr
- 1. LABORATORY REPORT : P135672 : 25/12/2021 1 :23 PM : 25/12/2021 1 :45PM : 26/12/2021 2 :56 PM : Patient ID Registered On Collected On Reported On External Id : Fathimat U Shamna : V134278 : 25 Y/ F Name Visit No Age/Gender Ref By Aadhar Card DOB : Kalarikkal X ray, Ramanattukara : 2921 3931 8569 : 18/06/1996 MOLECULAR BIOLOGY REPORT Test Name : COVID 19 SARS CoV 2 Detection by Qualitative Real Time PCR ICMR Registration Number: CARREFLABVKK SARS-CoV-2 Detection by Real Time Polymerase Chain Reaction TEST RESULT SARS-COV2 NEGATIVE Specimen Type : Method : Nasopharyngeal/Oropharyngeal swab RTPCR This Real Time Polymerase Chain Reaction test intended to use for the qualitative detection of a novel corona virus which was identified in 2019 at Wuhan City, Hubei province, China in upper respiratory tract specimens and lower respiratory tract specimens of infected people. Pathogen information : Corona viruses (CoV) are a large family of viruses that cause illness ranging from common cold to more severe diseases such as Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS -CoV) and Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome (SARS-CoV). SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) is a new strain that has not been previously identified in humans. Interpretation : A "POSITIVE" result indicates that Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome CoronaVirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2) RNA is present in the given sample and suggests the diagnosis of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Test result should always be considered in the context of patient's clinical history, physical examination, and epidemiologic exposures. A "NEGATIVE" result indicates that SARS-CoV-2 is not present in the patient's given specimen. Result should be correlated with patient’s history and clinical presentation. However it does not rule out the infection completely and should not be used as the sole basis for making decisions related to treatment and other patient management decisions. A false negative may resulted due to inadequate number of organisms are present in the specimen due to improper collection, transport or handling Note: The results relate only to the specimens tested and should be correlated with clinical findings Interpretation guidance: 1. Testing of referred clinical specimens was considered on the basis of request/referral received from/ through state surveillance officer(SSO) of concerned State Integrated Disease Surveillance Programme / any other health care facility affirming requirements of the case definition/s 2.A single negative test result, particularly if this is from an upper respiratory tract specimen, does not exclude infection 3.A positive test result is only tentative, and will be reconfirmed by retesting. 4.Repeat sampling and testing of lower respiratory specimen is strongly recommended in severe or progressive disease. The repeat specimens may be considered after a gap of 2-4 days after the collection of the first specimen for additional testing if required 5.A positive alternate pathogen does not necessarily rule out either, as little is yet known about the role of coinfections *** End of Report *** Page 1 of 1 Dr. Ronald A Roche MD Microbiology Consultant Microbiologist Dr. Reshmi Gopalakrishnan MD Microbiology Consultant Microbiologist