SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 36
Download to read offline
Gawad Kalinga: Innovation
 in the City (and Beyond)

         By Raymund B. Habaradas and
            Martin Lorenzo N. Aquino
Presentation outline
•   Problem statement and research objectives
•   Research framework, method, and design
•   Some facts about Metro Manila
•   Poverty and homelessness in the city
•   Brief description of Gawad Kalinga
•   Innovations of Gawad Kalinga
•   Assessment of Gawad Kalinga’s innovations
•   Conclusion
Problem statement
• What are the innovations implemented by Gawad
  Kalinga to address the problem of urban housing in
  Metro Manila?
Objectives
•   To briefly describe the urban housing situation in the
    Philippine setting.
•   To describe the innovative activities undertaken by Gawad
    Kalinga in terms of three spatial dimensions
•   To identify the key actors (e.g. communities, government
    agencies and local government units, benefactors, and
    volunteers) involved in Gawad Kalinga, and to determine
    the interaction among these actors.
•   To evaluate these innovative activities in terms of: (1)
    novelty, (2) impacts, (3) equity, (4) economic and financial
    feasibility, (5) environmental sustainability, (6)
    transferability, and (7) political acceptability.
Conceptual framework

          New ways of doing things;           Pertains to a tangiblethe
                                                Source from which item
          answers the question “how?”         orinnovators or users of the
                                                 object.
                                                information acquire relevant
                                                information in creating, adopting
                                                and diffusing or distributing the
                                                city innovations.



New ways of delivering kinds                                Explores patterns of thought,
                                                              Unearths novelties in terms
 Where it happens, where it
of innovations; intangible, yet                             learning and behavior in coming
                                                              of interactions, connections,
add certain value to theto an
 starts, and its relation lives                             up with innovative solutions, as
                                                              or hierarchies between
 urban built environment;
of those benefited.                                         well as the changes happening
                                                              elements in a given system
 also refers to geographical                                toor organization. think, learn,
                                                               the way people
 patterns of the innovation.                                and behave.



           Strategic aspect of innovation,   Changes in the ways of thought
           e.g. the vision, market niches,   or the ways of life; the light in
           overall strategy                  which one perceives the world.
Metro Manila
• Also known as the National Capital Region (NCR)
• Composed of 16 cities and one municipality; has a total of
  1,705 barangays (basic political unit).
• Population: 9.93 M in 2000; 11.55 M in 2007.
• Center of business, education, and politics in RP.
• Accounted for 33.01% of the RP’s GDP in 2008.
• Accounted for 41.0% of the country’s total tax collection.
• A magnet to migrants from provinces seeking opportunities in
  the city.
• In April 2009, unemployment rate is 14%; underemployment
  rate is 12%
Table 2. Metro Manila land area, population, and population growth
Local             Land Area         Population      Population     2007 Annual
government unit    (sq. km.)      (2007 Census)       density       Population
                                                   (per sq. km.)   Growth Rate
Caloocan             53.33           1,378,856        25,855            2.2
Las Pinas            41.54            532,330         12,815           1.65
Makati               27.36            510,383         18,654           1.91
Malabon              15.76            363,681         23,076            .98
Mandaluyong          11.26            305,576         27,138           1.29
Manila               38.55           1,660,714        43,079            .68
Marikina             33.97            424,610         12,500           1.14
Muntinlupa           46.70            452,943          9,699           2.48
Navotas              10.77            245,344         22,780            .87
Paranaque            47.69            552,660         11,589           2.88
Pasay                19.00            403,064         21,214           1.77
Pasig                31.00            617,301         19,913           2.80
Pateros              2.10             61,940          29,495           1.05
Quezon              161.12           2,679,450        16,630           2.92
San Juan             5.94             124,187         20,907           0.87
Taguig               47.88            613,343         12,810           3.82
Valenzuela           44.58            568,928         12,762           2.21
      TOTAL         638.55          11,553,427        18,093           2.11
Source: MMDA, 2010
Poverty in the city
Table 4. Official poverty statistics for urban population, Philippines, NCR and
CALABARZON (Region IVa): 2000, 2003, 2006
                            2000                  2003                  2006
                   Poverty     Magnitude Poverty     Magnitude Poverty     Magnitude
                   incidence of poor     incidence of poor     incidence of poor
Philippines        17.3        6,784,016 15.9        6,360,978 16.1        6,852,965
NCR                7.3         856,045   6.7         746,022   9.9         1,138,424
Region IVA         10.0        596,377   9.3         651,721   9.6         698,954
Source: National Statistical Coordination Board

Table 5. Increase / decrease in poverty for urban population, Philippines, NCR
and CALABARZON (Region IVa): 2000, 2003, 2006
                          Increase / Decrease (2000-2003)      Increase / Decrease (2003-2006)
                          Poverty            Magnitude      of Poverty          Magnitude        of
                          incidence          poor              incidence        poor
Philippines               (1.4)              (423,038)         0.2              491,987
NCR                       (0.6)              (110,023)         3.2              392,402
Region IVA                 (0.7)              55,343           0.3              47,233
Source: National Statistical Coordination Board
Homelessness in the city
• Because of poverty, 40% of both urban and rural
  households in RP resort to informal housing or illegal
  settlements in congested areas under poor living
  conditions.
• Spontaneous settlements: chaotic growth and
  land division, lack of basic infrastructure, lack of basic
  services; give rise to social problems, e.g. “high levels
  of criminality, health and sanitation problems, and
  poor quality of housing.”
Homelessness in the city
Table 6. Informal settlers in the Philippines
Major regions                           No. of informal settlers (households) *       Percentage
PHILIPPINES                                              550,771                         100%
LUZON                                                    352,100                         63.93
  NCR                                                    199,398                         36.20
  CALABARZON (Region IV-A)                                67,872                         12.32
  Rest of Luzon                                           84,830                         15.40
VISAYAS                                                   81,742                         14.84
MINDANAO                                                 116,929                         21.23
* Informal settlers are those households whose tenure status is "rent-free lot without consent of
owner."
Source: HUDCC, 2010 (Based on extrapolation made using the 2000 Census of Population and
Housing and 2007 Population Census, National Statistics Office)
Caloocan City: 18,565
                                                KALOOKAN CITY


                                 CITY OF VALENZUELA             Quezon City: 91,090
Estimated Number                                      QUEZON CITY
                            CITY OF MALABON
of Informal Settlers                                        CITY OF MARIKINA

in NCR: 2007             CITY OF NAVOTAS


                                            Manila: 19,949
                                            CITY OF SAN JUAN
NCR Total: 199,398        CITY OF MANILA   CITY OF MANDALUYONG

                                                              CITY OF PASIG
                                           CITY OF MAKATI
                                                       PATEROS
                                    PASAY CITY

                                                      TAGUIG CITY



                                      CITY OF PARAÑAQUE

                                                 Paranaque: 12,307
                                  CITY OF LAS PIÑAS



                                           CITY OF MUNTINLUPA
Relevant laws on housing
• Executive Order No 90 (1986)
  Set up the mechanism for the implementation of the six-year National
  Shelter Program (NSP); created the Housing and Urban Development
  Coordinating Council (HUDCC).
• Executive Order No. 357 (1989)
  Strengthened the coordinating mechanism of the NSP by allowing
  HUDCC to exercise overall administrative supervision over key housing
  agencies, and to adopt measures to improve coordination and integration
  of activities among them.
• Republic Act 7279 (1992)
  Provides for the implementation of a “comprehensive and continuing”
  Urban Development and Housing Program, which aims to “uplift the
  conditions of the underprivileged and homeless citizens in urban areas and
  resettlement areas…”
Republic Act 7279
• Also known as the Urban Development and Housing
  Act of 1992, RA 7279 provides for the following:
• Formulation of a National Urban Development and Housing
  Framework by the Housing and Land Use Regulatory Board
  (HLURB) under the direction of the HUDCC and in
  coordination with LGUs and other concerned public and
  private sectors.
• Identification of lands for socialized housing and resettlement
  areas for the underprivileged and homeless in urban areas.
• Disposition and valuation of lands for socialized housing, and
  the registration of socialized housing beneficiaries.
Republic Act 7279
• Also known as the Urban Development and Housing
  Act of 1992, RA 7279 provides for the following:
• Developers of proposed subdivision projects must develop an
  area for socialized housing equivalent to at least 20% of total
  subdivision area or total subdivision project cost within the
  same city.
• Incentives for participation of the private sector in socialized
  housing so as to reduce the cost of housing for the
  underprivileged and the homeless.
• More effective people’s participation in the urban
  development process, and improvement in the capability of
  local government units in undertaking urban development and
  housing programs and projects.
Housing backlog
• In spite of the efforts of government and the private sector,
  the urban housing problem remains.
• Estimates put the total housing need in the country to have
  reached 3.75 million units by 2010. NCR’s housing need was
  placed at 496,928 or 12.23% of the total.
• In the 2004-2010 MTPDP, however, the government made
  provisions for shelter assistance to 1.145 million households
  for the period 2005-2010, or only 30% of the total housing
  need for the said period.
• Clearly, various sectors of society must work together to
  solve a problem of this magnitude.
Gawad Kalinga
Gawad Kalinga
• As of June 2009, GK has built a total of 33,439
  houses in 1,400 villages in the Philippines; almost
  9,000 of which were in Metro Manila.
• GK has initiated self-sustaining programs that have
  improved the lives of more than 200,000 families
  throughout the country.
• P8 billion – estimated total development generated
  by GK in just over 8 years
  (P3 billion for houses; P0.5 billion for schools, clinics, and other
  infrastructure; P2 billion for land and site development; P2.5 billion for
  social preparations, donated professional services, volunteerism, and
  programs for health, education, and livelihood.)
Almost 9,000 houses in NCR
Table 12. Gawad Kalinga villages and houses built in the        NCR (as of June
2009)
City or municipality                     Total villages             Total houses
                                         f            %             f           %
Quezon City                             82           25.87       2,056        24.54
Caloocan                                51           16.09       1,376        16.42
Manila                                  47           14.83       1,303        15.55
Paranaque                               32           10.09        698          8.33
Rizal                                   31           9.78         932         11.12
Mandaluyong                             25           7.89         766          9.14
Las Pinas                               16           5.05         502          5.99
Taguig                                  12           3.79         239          2.85
Pasig                                   11           3.47         345          4.12
San Juan and Valenzuela                 4            1.26          63          0.75
Marikina                                2            0.63          52          0.62
Pateros                                 2            0.63           3          0.04
Muntinlupa                              1            0.32          39          0.47
Pasay                                   1            0.32           4          0.05
TOTAL                                  317          100.00      8,378        100.00
Source: Gawad Kalinga Community Development Foundation (2009)
Gawad Kalinga - beginnings
• 1995 – Couples for Christ organized a youth camp in Bagong
  Silang, Caloocan City, where the first GK community was
  established; the first house was built for the Adduru family
• 2000 – Twelve teams pioneered the first GK villages outside
  of Bagong Silang through the network of Youth for Christ;
  GK also built 80 homes for 400 victims of the flood that
  almost wiped out Ormoc
• 2002 – President Arroyo challenged GK to build 1,000
  homes with P30 million from her presidential fund; GK
  succeeded in building these houses in 70 sites throughout the
  country; other politicians followed suit
Gawad Kalinga - growth
• 2003 – Launch of GK777 during the first GK Expo in Fort
  Bonifacio; President Cory Aquino declared that “GK is People
  Power.”
• 2005 – GK Isang Milyong Bayani (GK1MB) was born; the first
  GK Highway of Peace began; the first Muslim GK village was
  built in Datu Paglas, Maguindanao.
• 2006 – GK received numerous awards from various groups,
  including the Magsaysay Award for Community Leadership.
• 2008 – GK Builders Institute (GKBI) was established.
• 2009 – GK unveiled to the world the emerging Asian Model
  for development at the first GK Global Summit in Boston.
Gawad Kalinga - growth




GK has become a true nation-
building movement.
GK’s pillars of success
• Empowered communities
• Holistic and integrated
  approach to community
  development
• Partnerships of meaning
• Gawad Kalinga brand
Empowered communities
• Paradigm shift: Members of poor communities are not seen as
  passive actors but as active participants in the community
  development process.
• GK engages the kapitbahayan, who must take responsibility
  for attaining the GK vision in their community.
• Members of the community, with the help of a GK caretaker
  team, organize themselves into a neighborhood association,
  participate in the values formation program of GK, and play a
  central role in the implementation of various GK programs.
• GK residents become stewards of their own communities.
Holistic approach
• Community infrastructure program (shelter)
• Child and youth development program (values
  formation)
• Gawad Kalusugan (health)
• Green Kalinga (environment)
• GK Bayan-Anihan (livelihood)
• GK Mabuhay (tourism)
• Community empowerment
Bayan-Anihan




• A partnership between GK and the Department of Agriculture;
  aims to eradicate hunger by empowering families in GK
  communities to produce their own food.
• Families in the community are given a 10-square meter lot to start
  a vegetable garden
• Launched in 2009, Bayan-Anihan seeks to launch 2,500 farms in the
  next three years to feed at least 500,000 people for life.
Partnerships of meaning
• GK does not only build houses; it builds relationships.
• GK caretaker teams establish a strong relationship with the
  kapitbahayan through their constant presence in the
  community.
• GK encourages corporate partners and individual donors to
  interact with members of the community and to be actively
  involved in the various activities of GK in their adopted
  communities.
• GK reaches out to the youth (through research projects,
  student internships and community outreach of student
  groups) by partnering with schools through the GK Builders
  Institute.
Big business as partner




•   GK actively engages its corporate donors in implementing GK
    programs and activities ‘on the ground’ (rather than simply
    raising funds).
•   Corporate partners are involved in a bigger project that is
    nation-building.
Partnerships with LGUs
•   GK’s work has expanded rapidly thanks to the support of mayors
    and governors in hundreds of local government units (LGUs)
    throughout the country.
•   Says GK Founder Tony Meloto: We must not judge politicians or
    beg for their help. We must support them so that they can become
    effective as public servants.
Active engagement and                                     Corporate
                                                          partners
continuing partnership
                                         GK Partnership   Government
                                         Management       agencies
                                         Group (GKPMG)    and LGUs

                                                          Other groups
             GK Caretaker          ‘Kapitbahayan’         (e.g.
             teams                 GK Community           associations,
                                                          OFWs, etc.)

Schools
(local and
abroad)         GK Builders
                Institute (GKBI)
Student
Volunteers
GK partnership approach

Different motives
and interests; but
one vision



                     Deriving meaning
                     from an enduring
                     partnership
Building the GK brand
• Gawad Kalinga has managed to put a unique spin to its
  programs and activities.
• GK communities are variously known as faith communities,
  peace zones, eco-friendly villages, and tourist spots.
• GK777 is the vision to build 700,000 homes in 7,000
  communities in seven years.
• GK2024 “seeks to uplift five million Filipinos out of extreme
  poverty by the year 2024, thereby building a first-class
  Philippines and a world-class Filipino.” Timeframe: 21 years –
  from October 4, 2003 until October 4, 2024.
Building the GK brand
• GK uses appealing slogans that inspire action:
  – Land for the landless. Homes for the homeless. Food
    for the hungry.
  – Lakas ng Pagbabago (The Power of Change)
  – Isang Milyong Bayani (One Million Volunteers; One
    Million Heroes)
  – Bawat Pilipino, Bayani! (Every Filipino, A Hero!)
  – Bayan. Bayani. Bayanihan. (Country. Hero. Collective
    and Heroic Action.)
  – Walang Iwanan! (No One Gets Left Behind!)
Gawad Kalinga’s innovations
Dimension   Description
Product     • GK villages have colorful homes in beautifully-landscaped
               surroundings.
            • GK has come up with new and better designs for homes, an
               improvement over the small box-type houses it previously built; GK
               communities in Taguig City have been designated as designer villages.
Service     • GK adopts an holistic and integrated approach to community
               development.
            • GK has a Child and Youth Development Program for the community’s
               children from their pre-school years up to their teen-age years.
            • Innovative programs include the following: Bayan-anihan, GK
               Mabuhay, Green Kalinga; GK communities have, thus, become self-
               sufficient, tourist-friendly, and eco-friendly villages.
Process     • GK strengthens the communities through the Kapitbahayan
               Neighborhood Associations, with the support of caretaker groups.
            • Community members offer “sweat equity” in building houses, while the
               caretaker teams work day-in and day-out in GK communities without
               expecting recognition nor reward (“padugo” or sacrifice)
Gawad Kalinga’s innovations
Dimension     Description
Position      • GK is fashioned as nation-building movement; a viable Asian model of
                 development.
              • GK communities are variously known as faith communities, peace
                 zones, eco-friendly villages, and tourist spots.
              • GK uses appealing slogans that inspire action.
Institution   • GK establishes formal partnerships with government agencies, local
                 government units (LGUs), corporations, academe, and other groups.
              • GK encourages donors / benefactors to participate actively in the
                 community’s programs so as to promote enduring partnerships.
Paradigm      • Community members are active participants in the development
                 process, not passive beneficiaries; residents are stewards of their own
                 communities.
              • GK does not just build homes, but also builds relationships
              • GK follows the “bayanihan” model, i.e., community development is
                 seen as a partnership that involves the kapitbahayan, the caretaker
                 team, partners (i.e. corporations, LGUs, schools), and volunteers.
              • “No one is too poor that he cannot share, and no one is too rich that he
                 cannot care.”
“Gawad Kalinga is a work of art and a labor of love. It
seeks to restore the beauty of the land by harnessing
the immense creativity and generosity of its people.”
- Tony Meloto, founder of Gawad Kalinga
Gawad Kalinga: Innovation
 in the City (and Beyond)

         By Raymund B. Habaradas and
            Martin Lorenzo N. Aquino

More Related Content

Viewers also liked

Socioeconomic Indicators as a Complement to Life Cycle Assessment
Socioeconomic Indicators as a Complement to Life Cycle AssessmentSocioeconomic Indicators as a Complement to Life Cycle Assessment
Socioeconomic Indicators as a Complement to Life Cycle AssessmentEcotrust
 
Correlates Of Socio Economic Status
Correlates Of Socio Economic StatusCorrelates Of Socio Economic Status
Correlates Of Socio Economic Statuswfisch
 
Assessing indigenous communities socio economic status as catalyst for forest...
Assessing indigenous communities socio economic status as catalyst for forest...Assessing indigenous communities socio economic status as catalyst for forest...
Assessing indigenous communities socio economic status as catalyst for forest...Alexander Decker
 
The influence of parents’ socio-economic status on students’ academic perform...
The influence of parents’ socio-economic status on students’ academic perform...The influence of parents’ socio-economic status on students’ academic perform...
The influence of parents’ socio-economic status on students’ academic perform...iosrjce
 
Perception, Interest and Socio-Economic Status of Teachers of Students with V...
Perception, Interest and Socio-Economic Status of Teachers of Students with V...Perception, Interest and Socio-Economic Status of Teachers of Students with V...
Perception, Interest and Socio-Economic Status of Teachers of Students with V...odewenwa
 
The effect of socioeconomic status on education
The effect of socioeconomic status on educationThe effect of socioeconomic status on education
The effect of socioeconomic status on educationconradtylerblackburn
 
Av city innovation systems-the metro manila experience
Av city innovation systems-the metro manila experienceAv city innovation systems-the metro manila experience
Av city innovation systems-the metro manila experienceSarit Tiyawongsuwan
 
100 L - petition suplement
100 L - petition suplement 100 L - petition suplement
100 L - petition suplement Jacquelyn Palma
 
Community profiling and analysis copy
Community profiling and analysis   copyCommunity profiling and analysis   copy
Community profiling and analysis copyAngelica Nhoj Gemora
 
End of life care: socio-economic status as a predictor of access to palliativ...
End of life care: socio-economic status as a predictor of access to palliativ...End of life care: socio-economic status as a predictor of access to palliativ...
End of life care: socio-economic status as a predictor of access to palliativ...British Sociological Association
 
socioeconomic status classification
socioeconomic status classificationsocioeconomic status classification
socioeconomic status classificationSunil Pal Singh
 
Economic and Social Indicators of Development
Economic and Social Indicators of DevelopmentEconomic and Social Indicators of Development
Economic and Social Indicators of DevelopmentRich Elle
 
Socioeconomic status
Socioeconomic statusSocioeconomic status
Socioeconomic statusrhondak84
 
Socio economic classification
Socio economic classificationSocio economic classification
Socio economic classificationhari krishnan.n
 

Viewers also liked (14)

Socioeconomic Indicators as a Complement to Life Cycle Assessment
Socioeconomic Indicators as a Complement to Life Cycle AssessmentSocioeconomic Indicators as a Complement to Life Cycle Assessment
Socioeconomic Indicators as a Complement to Life Cycle Assessment
 
Correlates Of Socio Economic Status
Correlates Of Socio Economic StatusCorrelates Of Socio Economic Status
Correlates Of Socio Economic Status
 
Assessing indigenous communities socio economic status as catalyst for forest...
Assessing indigenous communities socio economic status as catalyst for forest...Assessing indigenous communities socio economic status as catalyst for forest...
Assessing indigenous communities socio economic status as catalyst for forest...
 
The influence of parents’ socio-economic status on students’ academic perform...
The influence of parents’ socio-economic status on students’ academic perform...The influence of parents’ socio-economic status on students’ academic perform...
The influence of parents’ socio-economic status on students’ academic perform...
 
Perception, Interest and Socio-Economic Status of Teachers of Students with V...
Perception, Interest and Socio-Economic Status of Teachers of Students with V...Perception, Interest and Socio-Economic Status of Teachers of Students with V...
Perception, Interest and Socio-Economic Status of Teachers of Students with V...
 
The effect of socioeconomic status on education
The effect of socioeconomic status on educationThe effect of socioeconomic status on education
The effect of socioeconomic status on education
 
Av city innovation systems-the metro manila experience
Av city innovation systems-the metro manila experienceAv city innovation systems-the metro manila experience
Av city innovation systems-the metro manila experience
 
100 L - petition suplement
100 L - petition suplement 100 L - petition suplement
100 L - petition suplement
 
Community profiling and analysis copy
Community profiling and analysis   copyCommunity profiling and analysis   copy
Community profiling and analysis copy
 
End of life care: socio-economic status as a predictor of access to palliativ...
End of life care: socio-economic status as a predictor of access to palliativ...End of life care: socio-economic status as a predictor of access to palliativ...
End of life care: socio-economic status as a predictor of access to palliativ...
 
socioeconomic status classification
socioeconomic status classificationsocioeconomic status classification
socioeconomic status classification
 
Economic and Social Indicators of Development
Economic and Social Indicators of DevelopmentEconomic and Social Indicators of Development
Economic and Social Indicators of Development
 
Socioeconomic status
Socioeconomic statusSocioeconomic status
Socioeconomic status
 
Socio economic classification
Socio economic classificationSocio economic classification
Socio economic classification
 

Similar to Gawad Kalinga's Innovative Housing Solutions for Metro Manila's Urban Poor

Locality service planning with geographical information system: Spatial analy...
Locality service planning with geographical information system: Spatial analy...Locality service planning with geographical information system: Spatial analy...
Locality service planning with geographical information system: Spatial analy...husITa
 
Knight Foundation's Communities Program - Strategy Presentation
Knight Foundation's Communities Program - Strategy PresentationKnight Foundation's Communities Program - Strategy Presentation
Knight Foundation's Communities Program - Strategy PresentationKnight Foundation
 
10.25.2012 - Craig McIntosh
10.25.2012 - Craig McIntosh10.25.2012 - Craig McIntosh
10.25.2012 - Craig McIntoshAMDSeminarSeries
 
The Real and the Imagined Socially Responsible Real Estate in China - Context...
The Real and the Imagined Socially Responsible Real Estate in China - Context...The Real and the Imagined Socially Responsible Real Estate in China - Context...
The Real and the Imagined Socially Responsible Real Estate in China - Context...STL Lab
 
Arsenio M. Balisacan - Multidimensional Poverty 09 Oct 2011
Arsenio M. Balisacan - Multidimensional Poverty 09 Oct 2011Arsenio M. Balisacan - Multidimensional Poverty 09 Oct 2011
Arsenio M. Balisacan - Multidimensional Poverty 09 Oct 2011No to mining in Palawan
 
Role of Community Centres in Slum Upgradation
Role of Community Centres in Slum UpgradationRole of Community Centres in Slum Upgradation
Role of Community Centres in Slum UpgradationManas Murthy
 
Informal sector, networks_and_intra-city_variations_in_activities__findings_f...
Informal sector, networks_and_intra-city_variations_in_activities__findings_f...Informal sector, networks_and_intra-city_variations_in_activities__findings_f...
Informal sector, networks_and_intra-city_variations_in_activities__findings_f...Dr Lendy Spires
 
Desakota_Dr. Dipak Gyawali
Desakota_Dr. Dipak GyawaliDesakota_Dr. Dipak Gyawali
Desakota_Dr. Dipak GyawaliSaciWATERs
 
Tayyab ameen social entreprenuer
Tayyab ameen   social entreprenuerTayyab ameen   social entreprenuer
Tayyab ameen social entreprenuerMoodleMonkey
 
Joe Salvo Presentation
Joe Salvo PresentationJoe Salvo Presentation
Joe Salvo PresentationAaron Kendall
 
Honors college cuny 01 24-2013
Honors college cuny 01 24-2013Honors college cuny 01 24-2013
Honors college cuny 01 24-2013Joseph Ugoretz
 

Similar to Gawad Kalinga's Innovative Housing Solutions for Metro Manila's Urban Poor (18)

Ser ppb2
Ser ppb2Ser ppb2
Ser ppb2
 
Serppb2
Serppb2Serppb2
Serppb2
 
SDG Prioritization to Leave No One Behind
SDG Prioritization to Leave No One BehindSDG Prioritization to Leave No One Behind
SDG Prioritization to Leave No One Behind
 
Locality service planning with geographical information system: Spatial analy...
Locality service planning with geographical information system: Spatial analy...Locality service planning with geographical information system: Spatial analy...
Locality service planning with geographical information system: Spatial analy...
 
Knight Foundation's Communities Program - Strategy Presentation
Knight Foundation's Communities Program - Strategy PresentationKnight Foundation's Communities Program - Strategy Presentation
Knight Foundation's Communities Program - Strategy Presentation
 
10.25.2012 - Craig McIntosh
10.25.2012 - Craig McIntosh10.25.2012 - Craig McIntosh
10.25.2012 - Craig McIntosh
 
The Real and the Imagined Socially Responsible Real Estate in China - Context...
The Real and the Imagined Socially Responsible Real Estate in China - Context...The Real and the Imagined Socially Responsible Real Estate in China - Context...
The Real and the Imagined Socially Responsible Real Estate in China - Context...
 
Arsenio M. Balisacan - Multidimensional Poverty 09 Oct 2011
Arsenio M. Balisacan - Multidimensional Poverty 09 Oct 2011Arsenio M. Balisacan - Multidimensional Poverty 09 Oct 2011
Arsenio M. Balisacan - Multidimensional Poverty 09 Oct 2011
 
Nceo report ff_new_text
Nceo report ff_new_textNceo report ff_new_text
Nceo report ff_new_text
 
Role of Community Centres in Slum Upgradation
Role of Community Centres in Slum UpgradationRole of Community Centres in Slum Upgradation
Role of Community Centres in Slum Upgradation
 
Informal sector, networks_and_intra-city_variations_in_activities__findings_f...
Informal sector, networks_and_intra-city_variations_in_activities__findings_f...Informal sector, networks_and_intra-city_variations_in_activities__findings_f...
Informal sector, networks_and_intra-city_variations_in_activities__findings_f...
 
Desakota_Dr. Dipak Gyawali
Desakota_Dr. Dipak GyawaliDesakota_Dr. Dipak Gyawali
Desakota_Dr. Dipak Gyawali
 
Chapter 2
Chapter 2Chapter 2
Chapter 2
 
URBAN DECLINE AND SUCCESS.pptx
URBAN DECLINE AND SUCCESS.pptxURBAN DECLINE AND SUCCESS.pptx
URBAN DECLINE AND SUCCESS.pptx
 
Tayyab ameen social entreprenuer
Tayyab ameen   social entreprenuerTayyab ameen   social entreprenuer
Tayyab ameen social entreprenuer
 
Joe Salvo Presentation
Joe Salvo PresentationJoe Salvo Presentation
Joe Salvo Presentation
 
Honors college cuny 01 24-2013
Honors college cuny 01 24-2013Honors college cuny 01 24-2013
Honors college cuny 01 24-2013
 
7.2 SQ MI: A Report on Greater Downtown Detroit
7.2 SQ MI: A Report on Greater Downtown Detroit7.2 SQ MI: A Report on Greater Downtown Detroit
7.2 SQ MI: A Report on Greater Downtown Detroit
 

More from Sarit Tiyawongsuwan

HW-Jakarta Metropolis Area-city innovation
HW-Jakarta Metropolis Area-city innovationHW-Jakarta Metropolis Area-city innovation
HW-Jakarta Metropolis Area-city innovationSarit Tiyawongsuwan
 
NH and NRH report on malaysian case studies
NH and NRH report on malaysian case studiesNH and NRH report on malaysian case studies
NH and NRH report on malaysian case studiesSarit Tiyawongsuwan
 
Kt case studies on urban innovations in kuala lumpur-malaysia summary
Kt case studies on urban innovations in kuala lumpur-malaysia summaryKt case studies on urban innovations in kuala lumpur-malaysia summary
Kt case studies on urban innovations in kuala lumpur-malaysia summarySarit Tiyawongsuwan
 
Im one stop centre-city hall of kuala lumpur
Im one stop centre-city hall of kuala lumpurIm one stop centre-city hall of kuala lumpur
Im one stop centre-city hall of kuala lumpurSarit Tiyawongsuwan
 
Kt case studies on urban innovations in kl malaysia introductio
Kt case studies on urban innovations in kl malaysia introductioKt case studies on urban innovations in kl malaysia introductio
Kt case studies on urban innovations in kl malaysia introductioSarit Tiyawongsuwan
 

More from Sarit Tiyawongsuwan (6)

HW-Jakarta Metropolis Area-city innovation
HW-Jakarta Metropolis Area-city innovationHW-Jakarta Metropolis Area-city innovation
HW-Jakarta Metropolis Area-city innovation
 
NH and NRH report on malaysian case studies
NH and NRH report on malaysian case studiesNH and NRH report on malaysian case studies
NH and NRH report on malaysian case studies
 
Kt case studies on urban innovations in kuala lumpur-malaysia summary
Kt case studies on urban innovations in kuala lumpur-malaysia summaryKt case studies on urban innovations in kuala lumpur-malaysia summary
Kt case studies on urban innovations in kuala lumpur-malaysia summary
 
Im one stop centre-city hall of kuala lumpur
Im one stop centre-city hall of kuala lumpurIm one stop centre-city hall of kuala lumpur
Im one stop centre-city hall of kuala lumpur
 
Kt case studies on urban innovations in kl malaysia introductio
Kt case studies on urban innovations in kl malaysia introductioKt case studies on urban innovations in kl malaysia introductio
Kt case studies on urban innovations in kl malaysia introductio
 
Ar project introduction
Ar project introductionAr project introduction
Ar project introduction
 

Gawad Kalinga's Innovative Housing Solutions for Metro Manila's Urban Poor

  • 1. Gawad Kalinga: Innovation in the City (and Beyond) By Raymund B. Habaradas and Martin Lorenzo N. Aquino
  • 2. Presentation outline • Problem statement and research objectives • Research framework, method, and design • Some facts about Metro Manila • Poverty and homelessness in the city • Brief description of Gawad Kalinga • Innovations of Gawad Kalinga • Assessment of Gawad Kalinga’s innovations • Conclusion
  • 3. Problem statement • What are the innovations implemented by Gawad Kalinga to address the problem of urban housing in Metro Manila?
  • 4. Objectives • To briefly describe the urban housing situation in the Philippine setting. • To describe the innovative activities undertaken by Gawad Kalinga in terms of three spatial dimensions • To identify the key actors (e.g. communities, government agencies and local government units, benefactors, and volunteers) involved in Gawad Kalinga, and to determine the interaction among these actors. • To evaluate these innovative activities in terms of: (1) novelty, (2) impacts, (3) equity, (4) economic and financial feasibility, (5) environmental sustainability, (6) transferability, and (7) political acceptability.
  • 5. Conceptual framework New ways of doing things; Pertains to a tangiblethe Source from which item answers the question “how?” orinnovators or users of the object. information acquire relevant information in creating, adopting and diffusing or distributing the city innovations. New ways of delivering kinds Explores patterns of thought, Unearths novelties in terms Where it happens, where it of innovations; intangible, yet learning and behavior in coming of interactions, connections, add certain value to theto an starts, and its relation lives up with innovative solutions, as or hierarchies between urban built environment; of those benefited. well as the changes happening elements in a given system also refers to geographical toor organization. think, learn, the way people patterns of the innovation. and behave. Strategic aspect of innovation, Changes in the ways of thought e.g. the vision, market niches, or the ways of life; the light in overall strategy which one perceives the world.
  • 6. Metro Manila • Also known as the National Capital Region (NCR) • Composed of 16 cities and one municipality; has a total of 1,705 barangays (basic political unit). • Population: 9.93 M in 2000; 11.55 M in 2007. • Center of business, education, and politics in RP. • Accounted for 33.01% of the RP’s GDP in 2008. • Accounted for 41.0% of the country’s total tax collection. • A magnet to migrants from provinces seeking opportunities in the city. • In April 2009, unemployment rate is 14%; underemployment rate is 12%
  • 7. Table 2. Metro Manila land area, population, and population growth Local Land Area Population Population 2007 Annual government unit (sq. km.) (2007 Census) density Population (per sq. km.) Growth Rate Caloocan 53.33 1,378,856 25,855 2.2 Las Pinas 41.54 532,330 12,815 1.65 Makati 27.36 510,383 18,654 1.91 Malabon 15.76 363,681 23,076 .98 Mandaluyong 11.26 305,576 27,138 1.29 Manila 38.55 1,660,714 43,079 .68 Marikina 33.97 424,610 12,500 1.14 Muntinlupa 46.70 452,943 9,699 2.48 Navotas 10.77 245,344 22,780 .87 Paranaque 47.69 552,660 11,589 2.88 Pasay 19.00 403,064 21,214 1.77 Pasig 31.00 617,301 19,913 2.80 Pateros 2.10 61,940 29,495 1.05 Quezon 161.12 2,679,450 16,630 2.92 San Juan 5.94 124,187 20,907 0.87 Taguig 47.88 613,343 12,810 3.82 Valenzuela 44.58 568,928 12,762 2.21 TOTAL 638.55 11,553,427 18,093 2.11 Source: MMDA, 2010
  • 8. Poverty in the city Table 4. Official poverty statistics for urban population, Philippines, NCR and CALABARZON (Region IVa): 2000, 2003, 2006 2000 2003 2006 Poverty Magnitude Poverty Magnitude Poverty Magnitude incidence of poor incidence of poor incidence of poor Philippines 17.3 6,784,016 15.9 6,360,978 16.1 6,852,965 NCR 7.3 856,045 6.7 746,022 9.9 1,138,424 Region IVA 10.0 596,377 9.3 651,721 9.6 698,954 Source: National Statistical Coordination Board Table 5. Increase / decrease in poverty for urban population, Philippines, NCR and CALABARZON (Region IVa): 2000, 2003, 2006 Increase / Decrease (2000-2003) Increase / Decrease (2003-2006) Poverty Magnitude of Poverty Magnitude of incidence poor incidence poor Philippines (1.4) (423,038) 0.2 491,987 NCR (0.6) (110,023) 3.2 392,402 Region IVA (0.7) 55,343 0.3 47,233 Source: National Statistical Coordination Board
  • 9. Homelessness in the city • Because of poverty, 40% of both urban and rural households in RP resort to informal housing or illegal settlements in congested areas under poor living conditions. • Spontaneous settlements: chaotic growth and land division, lack of basic infrastructure, lack of basic services; give rise to social problems, e.g. “high levels of criminality, health and sanitation problems, and poor quality of housing.”
  • 10. Homelessness in the city Table 6. Informal settlers in the Philippines Major regions No. of informal settlers (households) * Percentage PHILIPPINES 550,771 100% LUZON 352,100 63.93 NCR 199,398 36.20 CALABARZON (Region IV-A) 67,872 12.32 Rest of Luzon 84,830 15.40 VISAYAS 81,742 14.84 MINDANAO 116,929 21.23 * Informal settlers are those households whose tenure status is "rent-free lot without consent of owner." Source: HUDCC, 2010 (Based on extrapolation made using the 2000 Census of Population and Housing and 2007 Population Census, National Statistics Office)
  • 11. Caloocan City: 18,565 KALOOKAN CITY CITY OF VALENZUELA Quezon City: 91,090 Estimated Number QUEZON CITY CITY OF MALABON of Informal Settlers CITY OF MARIKINA in NCR: 2007 CITY OF NAVOTAS Manila: 19,949 CITY OF SAN JUAN NCR Total: 199,398 CITY OF MANILA CITY OF MANDALUYONG CITY OF PASIG CITY OF MAKATI PATEROS PASAY CITY TAGUIG CITY CITY OF PARAÑAQUE Paranaque: 12,307 CITY OF LAS PIÑAS CITY OF MUNTINLUPA
  • 12. Relevant laws on housing • Executive Order No 90 (1986) Set up the mechanism for the implementation of the six-year National Shelter Program (NSP); created the Housing and Urban Development Coordinating Council (HUDCC). • Executive Order No. 357 (1989) Strengthened the coordinating mechanism of the NSP by allowing HUDCC to exercise overall administrative supervision over key housing agencies, and to adopt measures to improve coordination and integration of activities among them. • Republic Act 7279 (1992) Provides for the implementation of a “comprehensive and continuing” Urban Development and Housing Program, which aims to “uplift the conditions of the underprivileged and homeless citizens in urban areas and resettlement areas…”
  • 13. Republic Act 7279 • Also known as the Urban Development and Housing Act of 1992, RA 7279 provides for the following: • Formulation of a National Urban Development and Housing Framework by the Housing and Land Use Regulatory Board (HLURB) under the direction of the HUDCC and in coordination with LGUs and other concerned public and private sectors. • Identification of lands for socialized housing and resettlement areas for the underprivileged and homeless in urban areas. • Disposition and valuation of lands for socialized housing, and the registration of socialized housing beneficiaries.
  • 14. Republic Act 7279 • Also known as the Urban Development and Housing Act of 1992, RA 7279 provides for the following: • Developers of proposed subdivision projects must develop an area for socialized housing equivalent to at least 20% of total subdivision area or total subdivision project cost within the same city. • Incentives for participation of the private sector in socialized housing so as to reduce the cost of housing for the underprivileged and the homeless. • More effective people’s participation in the urban development process, and improvement in the capability of local government units in undertaking urban development and housing programs and projects.
  • 15. Housing backlog • In spite of the efforts of government and the private sector, the urban housing problem remains. • Estimates put the total housing need in the country to have reached 3.75 million units by 2010. NCR’s housing need was placed at 496,928 or 12.23% of the total. • In the 2004-2010 MTPDP, however, the government made provisions for shelter assistance to 1.145 million households for the period 2005-2010, or only 30% of the total housing need for the said period. • Clearly, various sectors of society must work together to solve a problem of this magnitude.
  • 17. Gawad Kalinga • As of June 2009, GK has built a total of 33,439 houses in 1,400 villages in the Philippines; almost 9,000 of which were in Metro Manila. • GK has initiated self-sustaining programs that have improved the lives of more than 200,000 families throughout the country. • P8 billion – estimated total development generated by GK in just over 8 years (P3 billion for houses; P0.5 billion for schools, clinics, and other infrastructure; P2 billion for land and site development; P2.5 billion for social preparations, donated professional services, volunteerism, and programs for health, education, and livelihood.)
  • 18. Almost 9,000 houses in NCR Table 12. Gawad Kalinga villages and houses built in the NCR (as of June 2009) City or municipality Total villages Total houses f % f % Quezon City 82 25.87 2,056 24.54 Caloocan 51 16.09 1,376 16.42 Manila 47 14.83 1,303 15.55 Paranaque 32 10.09 698 8.33 Rizal 31 9.78 932 11.12 Mandaluyong 25 7.89 766 9.14 Las Pinas 16 5.05 502 5.99 Taguig 12 3.79 239 2.85 Pasig 11 3.47 345 4.12 San Juan and Valenzuela 4 1.26 63 0.75 Marikina 2 0.63 52 0.62 Pateros 2 0.63 3 0.04 Muntinlupa 1 0.32 39 0.47 Pasay 1 0.32 4 0.05 TOTAL 317 100.00 8,378 100.00 Source: Gawad Kalinga Community Development Foundation (2009)
  • 19. Gawad Kalinga - beginnings • 1995 – Couples for Christ organized a youth camp in Bagong Silang, Caloocan City, where the first GK community was established; the first house was built for the Adduru family • 2000 – Twelve teams pioneered the first GK villages outside of Bagong Silang through the network of Youth for Christ; GK also built 80 homes for 400 victims of the flood that almost wiped out Ormoc • 2002 – President Arroyo challenged GK to build 1,000 homes with P30 million from her presidential fund; GK succeeded in building these houses in 70 sites throughout the country; other politicians followed suit
  • 20. Gawad Kalinga - growth • 2003 – Launch of GK777 during the first GK Expo in Fort Bonifacio; President Cory Aquino declared that “GK is People Power.” • 2005 – GK Isang Milyong Bayani (GK1MB) was born; the first GK Highway of Peace began; the first Muslim GK village was built in Datu Paglas, Maguindanao. • 2006 – GK received numerous awards from various groups, including the Magsaysay Award for Community Leadership. • 2008 – GK Builders Institute (GKBI) was established. • 2009 – GK unveiled to the world the emerging Asian Model for development at the first GK Global Summit in Boston.
  • 21. Gawad Kalinga - growth GK has become a true nation- building movement.
  • 22. GK’s pillars of success • Empowered communities • Holistic and integrated approach to community development • Partnerships of meaning • Gawad Kalinga brand
  • 23. Empowered communities • Paradigm shift: Members of poor communities are not seen as passive actors but as active participants in the community development process. • GK engages the kapitbahayan, who must take responsibility for attaining the GK vision in their community. • Members of the community, with the help of a GK caretaker team, organize themselves into a neighborhood association, participate in the values formation program of GK, and play a central role in the implementation of various GK programs. • GK residents become stewards of their own communities.
  • 24. Holistic approach • Community infrastructure program (shelter) • Child and youth development program (values formation) • Gawad Kalusugan (health) • Green Kalinga (environment) • GK Bayan-Anihan (livelihood) • GK Mabuhay (tourism) • Community empowerment
  • 25. Bayan-Anihan • A partnership between GK and the Department of Agriculture; aims to eradicate hunger by empowering families in GK communities to produce their own food. • Families in the community are given a 10-square meter lot to start a vegetable garden • Launched in 2009, Bayan-Anihan seeks to launch 2,500 farms in the next three years to feed at least 500,000 people for life.
  • 26. Partnerships of meaning • GK does not only build houses; it builds relationships. • GK caretaker teams establish a strong relationship with the kapitbahayan through their constant presence in the community. • GK encourages corporate partners and individual donors to interact with members of the community and to be actively involved in the various activities of GK in their adopted communities. • GK reaches out to the youth (through research projects, student internships and community outreach of student groups) by partnering with schools through the GK Builders Institute.
  • 27. Big business as partner • GK actively engages its corporate donors in implementing GK programs and activities ‘on the ground’ (rather than simply raising funds). • Corporate partners are involved in a bigger project that is nation-building.
  • 28. Partnerships with LGUs • GK’s work has expanded rapidly thanks to the support of mayors and governors in hundreds of local government units (LGUs) throughout the country. • Says GK Founder Tony Meloto: We must not judge politicians or beg for their help. We must support them so that they can become effective as public servants.
  • 29. Active engagement and Corporate partners continuing partnership GK Partnership Government Management agencies Group (GKPMG) and LGUs Other groups GK Caretaker ‘Kapitbahayan’ (e.g. teams GK Community associations, OFWs, etc.) Schools (local and abroad) GK Builders Institute (GKBI) Student Volunteers
  • 30. GK partnership approach Different motives and interests; but one vision Deriving meaning from an enduring partnership
  • 31. Building the GK brand • Gawad Kalinga has managed to put a unique spin to its programs and activities. • GK communities are variously known as faith communities, peace zones, eco-friendly villages, and tourist spots. • GK777 is the vision to build 700,000 homes in 7,000 communities in seven years. • GK2024 “seeks to uplift five million Filipinos out of extreme poverty by the year 2024, thereby building a first-class Philippines and a world-class Filipino.” Timeframe: 21 years – from October 4, 2003 until October 4, 2024.
  • 32. Building the GK brand • GK uses appealing slogans that inspire action: – Land for the landless. Homes for the homeless. Food for the hungry. – Lakas ng Pagbabago (The Power of Change) – Isang Milyong Bayani (One Million Volunteers; One Million Heroes) – Bawat Pilipino, Bayani! (Every Filipino, A Hero!) – Bayan. Bayani. Bayanihan. (Country. Hero. Collective and Heroic Action.) – Walang Iwanan! (No One Gets Left Behind!)
  • 33. Gawad Kalinga’s innovations Dimension Description Product • GK villages have colorful homes in beautifully-landscaped surroundings. • GK has come up with new and better designs for homes, an improvement over the small box-type houses it previously built; GK communities in Taguig City have been designated as designer villages. Service • GK adopts an holistic and integrated approach to community development. • GK has a Child and Youth Development Program for the community’s children from their pre-school years up to their teen-age years. • Innovative programs include the following: Bayan-anihan, GK Mabuhay, Green Kalinga; GK communities have, thus, become self- sufficient, tourist-friendly, and eco-friendly villages. Process • GK strengthens the communities through the Kapitbahayan Neighborhood Associations, with the support of caretaker groups. • Community members offer “sweat equity” in building houses, while the caretaker teams work day-in and day-out in GK communities without expecting recognition nor reward (“padugo” or sacrifice)
  • 34. Gawad Kalinga’s innovations Dimension Description Position • GK is fashioned as nation-building movement; a viable Asian model of development. • GK communities are variously known as faith communities, peace zones, eco-friendly villages, and tourist spots. • GK uses appealing slogans that inspire action. Institution • GK establishes formal partnerships with government agencies, local government units (LGUs), corporations, academe, and other groups. • GK encourages donors / benefactors to participate actively in the community’s programs so as to promote enduring partnerships. Paradigm • Community members are active participants in the development process, not passive beneficiaries; residents are stewards of their own communities. • GK does not just build homes, but also builds relationships • GK follows the “bayanihan” model, i.e., community development is seen as a partnership that involves the kapitbahayan, the caretaker team, partners (i.e. corporations, LGUs, schools), and volunteers. • “No one is too poor that he cannot share, and no one is too rich that he cannot care.”
  • 35. “Gawad Kalinga is a work of art and a labor of love. It seeks to restore the beauty of the land by harnessing the immense creativity and generosity of its people.” - Tony Meloto, founder of Gawad Kalinga
  • 36. Gawad Kalinga: Innovation in the City (and Beyond) By Raymund B. Habaradas and Martin Lorenzo N. Aquino