SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 4
Download to read offline
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS
DATED : 16.04.2015
CORAM :
THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.N.PRAKASH
Crl.O.P.SR.No.15141 of 2015
P.Chandira .. Petitioner
Vs.
1. The Inspector of Police,
Kavindapadi Erode District
2. The Inspector of Police,
District Crime, Erode District
3. The Sub-Inspector of Police,
Bhavani, Erode District
4. Inspector of Police,
Bhavani, Erode District
5. The Deputy Superintendent of Police,
Bhavani, Erode District
6. The Superintendent of Police,
Erode District
7. The Director General of Police,
Chennai .. Respondents
2
Prayer:- Petition has been filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. to direct
the respondents to register the complaint of the petitioner to find out the
person who signed my grand father's forgery signature as he was not
able to sign from 17.05.1999 and made thumb impression in Partition
deed.
For petitioner/ Party in person : Ms.P.Chandira
O R D E R
This petition has been filed by the petitioner to direct the
respondents to register the complaint of the petitioner to find out the
person who signed her grand father's forgery signature as he was not
able to sign from 17.05.1999 and made thumb impression in Partition
deed. This petition is listed today under the caption “for maintainability”.
2. Heard the petitioner, party-in-person and perused the materials
placed on record.
3. Even according to the petitioner, she lodged a complaint, which
has been investigated by the police and final report has been filed
before learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Bhavani. It is alleged by the
petitioner that her grand father's Will dated 02.06.1999 has been forged
by some persons. It is to be noted that for the incident that is alleged to
3
have been taken place in the year 1999, the petitioner wants to conduct
investigation in the year 2015. Therefore, positive direction to the police
cannot be given to conduct investigation in the case. However, it is
open to the petitioner to approach the Civil Court by challenging the Will
by filing appropriate application.
With the above observation, this petition is closed and the
objection raised by the Registry is upheld.
16.04.2015
Index: Yes/No
Internet: Yes/No
ssd
P.N.PRAKASH,J.,
ssd
To
4
1. The Inspector of Police,
Kavindapadi Erode District
2. The Inspector of Police,
District Crime, Erode District
3. The Sub-Inspector of Police,
Bhavani, Erode District
4. Inspector of Police,
Bhavani, Erode District
5. The Deputy Superintendent of Police,
Bhavani, Erode District
6. The Superintendent of Police,
Erode District
7. The Director General of Police,
Chennai
8. The Public Prosecutor,
High Court, Madras.
Crl.O.P.SR.No.15141 of 2015
16.04.2015

More Related Content

What's hot

Pb&har hc order, oct 30
Pb&har hc order, oct 30Pb&har hc order, oct 30
Pb&har hc order, oct 30ZahidManiyar
 
Siddique k interim bail sc order
Siddique k interim bail sc orderSiddique k interim bail sc order
Siddique k interim bail sc orderZahidManiyar
 
Kappan medical bail order
Kappan medical bail orderKappan medical bail order
Kappan medical bail orderZahidManiyar
 
Faisal khan v state of up
Faisal khan v state of upFaisal khan v state of up
Faisal khan v state of upZahidManiyar
 
Official Guidelines for Voter Registration (Form 6)
Official Guidelines for Voter Registration (Form 6)Official Guidelines for Voter Registration (Form 6)
Official Guidelines for Voter Registration (Form 6)himaenshu
 
Vinod dua judgment
Vinod dua judgmentVinod dua judgment
Vinod dua judgmentZahidManiyar
 
Allahabad hc sept 3 crlp(a) 7273 2021
Allahabad hc sept 3 crlp(a) 7273 2021Allahabad hc sept 3 crlp(a) 7273 2021
Allahabad hc sept 3 crlp(a) 7273 2021sabrangsabrang
 
Madras hc apr 1 order uidai
Madras hc apr 1 order uidaiMadras hc apr 1 order uidai
Madras hc apr 1 order uidaiZahidManiyar
 
Allahabad hc rao vs state of up (1)
Allahabad hc  rao vs state of up (1)Allahabad hc  rao vs state of up (1)
Allahabad hc rao vs state of up (1)sabrangsabrang
 
Facebook's Business Model Challenged Following EU Regulator Ruling
Facebook's Business Model Challenged Following EU Regulator RulingFacebook's Business Model Challenged Following EU Regulator Ruling
Facebook's Business Model Challenged Following EU Regulator RulingBarry Schuman
 
Extract from the unified register of pre-trial investigations (Criminal proce...
Extract from the unified register of pre-trial investigations (Criminal proce...Extract from the unified register of pre-trial investigations (Criminal proce...
Extract from the unified register of pre-trial investigations (Criminal proce...NABU Leaks
 

What's hot (15)

Pb&har hc order, oct 30
Pb&har hc order, oct 30Pb&har hc order, oct 30
Pb&har hc order, oct 30
 
Siddique k interim bail sc order
Siddique k interim bail sc orderSiddique k interim bail sc order
Siddique k interim bail sc order
 
A2CH4S
A2CH4SA2CH4S
A2CH4S
 
Kappan medical bail order
Kappan medical bail orderKappan medical bail order
Kappan medical bail order
 
Faisal khan v state of up
Faisal khan v state of upFaisal khan v state of up
Faisal khan v state of up
 
Official Guidelines for Voter Registration (Form 6)
Official Guidelines for Voter Registration (Form 6)Official Guidelines for Voter Registration (Form 6)
Official Guidelines for Voter Registration (Form 6)
 
Vinod dua judgment
Vinod dua judgmentVinod dua judgment
Vinod dua judgment
 
Allahabad hc sept 3 crlp(a) 7273 2021
Allahabad hc sept 3 crlp(a) 7273 2021Allahabad hc sept 3 crlp(a) 7273 2021
Allahabad hc sept 3 crlp(a) 7273 2021
 
Madras hc apr 1 order uidai
Madras hc apr 1 order uidaiMadras hc apr 1 order uidai
Madras hc apr 1 order uidai
 
Moj falsifying documents
Moj falsifying documentsMoj falsifying documents
Moj falsifying documents
 
Allahabad hc rao vs state of up (1)
Allahabad hc  rao vs state of up (1)Allahabad hc  rao vs state of up (1)
Allahabad hc rao vs state of up (1)
 
Rs bharathi order
Rs bharathi orderRs bharathi order
Rs bharathi order
 
Vinson m paul cic ksic-idiot or traitor- you decide
Vinson m paul cic ksic-idiot or traitor- you decideVinson m paul cic ksic-idiot or traitor- you decide
Vinson m paul cic ksic-idiot or traitor- you decide
 
Facebook's Business Model Challenged Following EU Regulator Ruling
Facebook's Business Model Challenged Following EU Regulator RulingFacebook's Business Model Challenged Following EU Regulator Ruling
Facebook's Business Model Challenged Following EU Regulator Ruling
 
Extract from the unified register of pre-trial investigations (Criminal proce...
Extract from the unified register of pre-trial investigations (Criminal proce...Extract from the unified register of pre-trial investigations (Criminal proce...
Extract from the unified register of pre-trial investigations (Criminal proce...
 

Similar to CRLOPSR15141

In the high_court_of_judicature_at_..._vs_state_rep._by_on_16_april,_2015
In the high_court_of_judicature_at_..._vs_state_rep._by_on_16_april,_2015In the high_court_of_judicature_at_..._vs_state_rep._by_on_16_april,_2015
In the high_court_of_judicature_at_..._vs_state_rep._by_on_16_april,_2015S.Ezhil Raj
 
Bom hc custodial death compensation order
Bom hc custodial death compensation orderBom hc custodial death compensation order
Bom hc custodial death compensation orderZahidManiyar
 
8th oct, jharkhand hc order (1)
8th oct, jharkhand hc order (1)8th oct, jharkhand hc order (1)
8th oct, jharkhand hc order (1)sabrangsabrang
 
Lawweb.in when court can reject prayer of accused for his discharge from crim...
Lawweb.in when court can reject prayer of accused for his discharge from crim...Lawweb.in when court can reject prayer of accused for his discharge from crim...
Lawweb.in when court can reject prayer of accused for his discharge from crim...Law Web
 
Petition seeking stay on the arrest of Jumman and Parvaz
Petition seeking stay on the arrest of Jumman and ParvazPetition seeking stay on the arrest of Jumman and Parvaz
Petition seeking stay on the arrest of Jumman and Parvazsabrangsabrang
 
Amar nath chaubey_vs_uoi
Amar nath chaubey_vs_uoiAmar nath chaubey_vs_uoi
Amar nath chaubey_vs_uoisabrangsabrang
 
Nia reply affidavit
Nia reply affidavitNia reply affidavit
Nia reply affidavitZahidManiyar
 
20201018 andheri mm court 20 tablighis acquitted(1)
20201018 andheri mm court 20 tablighis acquitted(1)20201018 andheri mm court 20 tablighis acquitted(1)
20201018 andheri mm court 20 tablighis acquitted(1)sabrangsabrang
 
bombay-hc-cruelty-441178.pdf
bombay-hc-cruelty-441178.pdfbombay-hc-cruelty-441178.pdf
bombay-hc-cruelty-441178.pdfsabrangsabrang
 
61306823 common-law-case
61306823 common-law-case61306823 common-law-case
61306823 common-law-casehomeworkping4
 
APPEAL CASE NO. 2422 OF 2019 Kanika aka Kusum Relan D/o Sh. Sita Ram Relan, 5...
APPEAL CASE NO. 2422 OF 2019 Kanika aka Kusum Relan D/o Sh. Sita Ram Relan, 5...APPEAL CASE NO. 2422 OF 2019 Kanika aka Kusum Relan D/o Sh. Sita Ram Relan, 5...
APPEAL CASE NO. 2422 OF 2019 Kanika aka Kusum Relan D/o Sh. Sita Ram Relan, 5...tigele
 
Laxmibai chandaragi (intercaste) judgement 08-feb-2021
Laxmibai chandaragi (intercaste) judgement 08-feb-2021Laxmibai chandaragi (intercaste) judgement 08-feb-2021
Laxmibai chandaragi (intercaste) judgement 08-feb-2021sabrangsabrang
 
karnataka-hc-1-456310.pdf
karnataka-hc-1-456310.pdfkarnataka-hc-1-456310.pdf
karnataka-hc-1-456310.pdfsabrangsabrang
 
Madras hc pocso order march 16
Madras hc pocso order march 16Madras hc pocso order march 16
Madras hc pocso order march 16ZahidManiyar
 

Similar to CRLOPSR15141 (20)

In the high_court_of_judicature_at_..._vs_state_rep._by_on_16_april,_2015
In the high_court_of_judicature_at_..._vs_state_rep._by_on_16_april,_2015In the high_court_of_judicature_at_..._vs_state_rep._by_on_16_april,_2015
In the high_court_of_judicature_at_..._vs_state_rep._by_on_16_april,_2015
 
Bom hc custodial death compensation order
Bom hc custodial death compensation orderBom hc custodial death compensation order
Bom hc custodial death compensation order
 
8th oct, jharkhand hc order (1)
8th oct, jharkhand hc order (1)8th oct, jharkhand hc order (1)
8th oct, jharkhand hc order (1)
 
Affidavit pattappan
Affidavit pattappanAffidavit pattappan
Affidavit pattappan
 
Lawweb.in when court can reject prayer of accused for his discharge from crim...
Lawweb.in when court can reject prayer of accused for his discharge from crim...Lawweb.in when court can reject prayer of accused for his discharge from crim...
Lawweb.in when court can reject prayer of accused for his discharge from crim...
 
Petition seeking stay on the arrest of Jumman and Parvaz
Petition seeking stay on the arrest of Jumman and ParvazPetition seeking stay on the arrest of Jumman and Parvaz
Petition seeking stay on the arrest of Jumman and Parvaz
 
Amar nath chaubey_vs_uoi
Amar nath chaubey_vs_uoiAmar nath chaubey_vs_uoi
Amar nath chaubey_vs_uoi
 
E.mohanammal
E.mohanammalE.mohanammal
E.mohanammal
 
Co 498 17 appeal outcome r
Co 498 17 appeal outcome rCo 498 17 appeal outcome r
Co 498 17 appeal outcome r
 
Nia reply affidavit
Nia reply affidavitNia reply affidavit
Nia reply affidavit
 
Judgement dated 170415
Judgement dated 170415Judgement dated 170415
Judgement dated 170415
 
20201018 andheri mm court 20 tablighis acquitted(1)
20201018 andheri mm court 20 tablighis acquitted(1)20201018 andheri mm court 20 tablighis acquitted(1)
20201018 andheri mm court 20 tablighis acquitted(1)
 
Saathik ali v state
Saathik ali v stateSaathik ali v state
Saathik ali v state
 
bombay-hc-cruelty-441178.pdf
bombay-hc-cruelty-441178.pdfbombay-hc-cruelty-441178.pdf
bombay-hc-cruelty-441178.pdf
 
FIR Direction
FIR DirectionFIR Direction
FIR Direction
 
61306823 common-law-case
61306823 common-law-case61306823 common-law-case
61306823 common-law-case
 
APPEAL CASE NO. 2422 OF 2019 Kanika aka Kusum Relan D/o Sh. Sita Ram Relan, 5...
APPEAL CASE NO. 2422 OF 2019 Kanika aka Kusum Relan D/o Sh. Sita Ram Relan, 5...APPEAL CASE NO. 2422 OF 2019 Kanika aka Kusum Relan D/o Sh. Sita Ram Relan, 5...
APPEAL CASE NO. 2422 OF 2019 Kanika aka Kusum Relan D/o Sh. Sita Ram Relan, 5...
 
Laxmibai chandaragi (intercaste) judgement 08-feb-2021
Laxmibai chandaragi (intercaste) judgement 08-feb-2021Laxmibai chandaragi (intercaste) judgement 08-feb-2021
Laxmibai chandaragi (intercaste) judgement 08-feb-2021
 
karnataka-hc-1-456310.pdf
karnataka-hc-1-456310.pdfkarnataka-hc-1-456310.pdf
karnataka-hc-1-456310.pdf
 
Madras hc pocso order march 16
Madras hc pocso order march 16Madras hc pocso order march 16
Madras hc pocso order march 16
 

More from chandira thangavel (20)

power
powerpower
power
 
BEFORE THE HON
BEFORE THE HONBEFORE THE HON
BEFORE THE HON
 
From
FromFrom
From
 
stay
staystay
stay
 
Writ Petition pondy
Writ Petition pondyWrit Petition pondy
Writ Petition pondy
 
reply to counter in Crl.O.P.No6002
reply to counter in Crl.O.P.No6002reply to counter in Crl.O.P.No6002
reply to counter in Crl.O.P.No6002
 
1152
11521152
1152
 
25115
2511525115
25115
 
2b petition in pondy affidavit
2b petition in pondy affidavit2b petition in pondy affidavit
2b petition in pondy affidavit
 
6002
60026002
6002
 
compliant against natarajan and ananthakrishnan
compliant against natarajan and ananthakrishnancompliant against natarajan and ananthakrishnan
compliant against natarajan and ananthakrishnan
 
agreement dated 02.11.99
agreement dated 02.11.99agreement dated 02.11.99
agreement dated 02.11.99
 
CHANDRA-2B-1 (1)
CHANDRA-2B-1 (1)CHANDRA-2B-1 (1)
CHANDRA-2B-1 (1)
 
Mamma Affidavit to correct rating and regularisation of period
Mamma Affidavit to correct rating and regularisation of periodMamma Affidavit to correct rating and regularisation of period
Mamma Affidavit to correct rating and regularisation of period
 
REGISTERED POST WITH ACK DUE (2)
REGISTERED POST WITH ACK DUE (2)REGISTERED POST WITH ACK DUE (2)
REGISTERED POST WITH ACK DUE (2)
 
NEYVELI LIGNITE CORPORATION LIMITED
NEYVELI LIGNITE CORPORATION LIMITEDNEYVELI LIGNITE CORPORATION LIMITED
NEYVELI LIGNITE CORPORATION LIMITED
 
regularisation of period-2
regularisation of period-2regularisation of period-2
regularisation of period-2
 
Dev_Dutt (1)
Dev_Dutt (1)Dev_Dutt (1)
Dev_Dutt (1)
 
PROPFORMA FOR PADMA AWARD
PROPFORMA FOR PADMA AWARDPROPFORMA FOR PADMA AWARD
PROPFORMA FOR PADMA AWARD
 
CITATION
CITATIONCITATION
CITATION
 

CRLOPSR15141

  • 1. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 16.04.2015 CORAM : THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE P.N.PRAKASH Crl.O.P.SR.No.15141 of 2015 P.Chandira .. Petitioner Vs. 1. The Inspector of Police, Kavindapadi Erode District 2. The Inspector of Police, District Crime, Erode District 3. The Sub-Inspector of Police, Bhavani, Erode District 4. Inspector of Police, Bhavani, Erode District 5. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Bhavani, Erode District 6. The Superintendent of Police, Erode District 7. The Director General of Police, Chennai .. Respondents
  • 2. 2 Prayer:- Petition has been filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. to direct the respondents to register the complaint of the petitioner to find out the person who signed my grand father's forgery signature as he was not able to sign from 17.05.1999 and made thumb impression in Partition deed. For petitioner/ Party in person : Ms.P.Chandira O R D E R This petition has been filed by the petitioner to direct the respondents to register the complaint of the petitioner to find out the person who signed her grand father's forgery signature as he was not able to sign from 17.05.1999 and made thumb impression in Partition deed. This petition is listed today under the caption “for maintainability”. 2. Heard the petitioner, party-in-person and perused the materials placed on record. 3. Even according to the petitioner, she lodged a complaint, which has been investigated by the police and final report has been filed before learned Judicial Magistrate No.II, Bhavani. It is alleged by the petitioner that her grand father's Will dated 02.06.1999 has been forged by some persons. It is to be noted that for the incident that is alleged to
  • 3. 3 have been taken place in the year 1999, the petitioner wants to conduct investigation in the year 2015. Therefore, positive direction to the police cannot be given to conduct investigation in the case. However, it is open to the petitioner to approach the Civil Court by challenging the Will by filing appropriate application. With the above observation, this petition is closed and the objection raised by the Registry is upheld. 16.04.2015 Index: Yes/No Internet: Yes/No ssd P.N.PRAKASH,J., ssd To
  • 4. 4 1. The Inspector of Police, Kavindapadi Erode District 2. The Inspector of Police, District Crime, Erode District 3. The Sub-Inspector of Police, Bhavani, Erode District 4. Inspector of Police, Bhavani, Erode District 5. The Deputy Superintendent of Police, Bhavani, Erode District 6. The Superintendent of Police, Erode District 7. The Director General of Police, Chennai 8. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras. Crl.O.P.SR.No.15141 of 2015 16.04.2015