2. Introduction:
CD can affect any part of GIT.
Current guidelines do not differentiate between small-intestinal &colonic
CD for medical treatment.
Ileal CD is distinct from colonic CD in several intestinal layers:
Colonic CD shows an overlap with regard to disease behaviour with UC,
underlining the fact that there is more to IBD than just CD/UC&subtypes,
possibly defined by location& shared pathophysiology.
There are differences between Ileal&colonic CD using in epidemiology,
genetics, macroscopic differences(creeping fat), histological findings&
intestinal barrier including gut microbiota, mucus layer, epithelial cells &
infiltrating immune cell populations.
These differences translate into the clinic, emphasizing the important role
of treatment decisions.
3.
4. Site-specific changes of the mesentery in Crohn’s disease.
A.the mesentery under healthy conditions, adipocytes,
mesenchymal cells& immune cells are present. No significant
differences can be seen between the mesentery adjacent to the
ileum& thatadjacent to the colon.
B. In Crohn’s disease, the mesentery of the ileum develops
characteristic changes including hyperplasia of adipocytes,
wrapping of the inflamed intestinal segment (creeping fat), fibrosis
&a strong immune cell infiltrate. In creeping fat, tertiary lymphoid
organs (TLOs) are found in close proximity to the lymphatic vessel
& B cells/ innate lymphoid cells invade the lymphatic wall.
The mesentery of the inflamed colon is only loosely attached, the
adipocytes are of normal size& the immune cell infiltrate is only
mildly developed. The mesentery of the colon in Crohn’s disease
resembles the mesentery in ulcerative colitis.
5.
6. Site-specific changes in CD.
A. Structural&immunological differences bet ileum& colon in a
healthy state.The ileum has single mucus layer partially penetrable
by intestinal microbiota,presents the first line of defence &contains
antimicrobial peptides (AMP)/IgA to defend translocalizing
bacteria.AMP produced by Paneth cells at the crypt.
By contrast, healthy colon is characterized by a double layer of
mucus, where microbiota can penetrate the luminal layer but not
layer underneath,also contains AMP for defence,by secretory cells.
B.Site-specific changes in CD, showing a decrease in the mucus
layer& composition, decreased diversity of gut microbiota/ AMP, a
disrupted epithelial barrier & the dominance of T helper 1(TH1)&
TH17 cells in the lamina propria of the terminal ileum.
In colon, the two mucus layers equally decrease& change their
composition,the diversity of the microbiota changes in a site-
specific manner, epithelial cells are partially disrupted& a TH1
response dominates the lamina propria.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
15. Conclusion:
The principle differences between SI& colon,make it obvious that there are
site-specific changes in ileal& colonic CD.
CD phenotype can be divided into 30% ileal disease, 40% ileocolonic
disease& 30% colonic disease
Some suggested a new classification consisting of ileum-dominant& colon-
dominant disease.
Even in isolated colonic dis, distinct changes of ileal microbiota are presen
&although inflammation is driven by different pathways, both sites seem
to influence each other.
There is trend towards lower efficacy of biological therapies in isolated
ileal Crohn’s disease than in colonic.