1. Novel Graphical User Interface (GUI) Paradigm on Mobile Mind Mapping Applications RadenSucalit e: raden.sucalit@jcu.edu.au Dr. Jason Holdsworth Supervisor http://project.brownmestizo.net

2. Mobile phones are popular tools

3. User Interface is moving fast

4. Is User Interface the same as GRAPHICAL USER INTERFACE?

5. UI is what the user sees and interacts with User Interface (UI)

6. User Interface (UI)

8. GUI uses graphic elements and visual indicators Graphical User Interface (UI)

14. WIMP Interaction Style Windows, Icons, Menus, Pointer

15. User Interface is moving fast

16. User Interface is moving fast Analog Input | Analog Output

17. User Interface is moving fast Indirect Input | Text Output

18. User Interface is moving fast Direct Input | Graphical Output

19. User Interface is moving fast Natural Input | Natural Output

20. Mobile applications are popular

21. Is popularity equivalent to ACCEPTANCE?

22. real experience is unaddressed

23. what if we have a wrong notion on MOBILE APPLICATIONS?

24. A borrowed interaction model (IM)

25. A borrowed interaction model (IM)

26. how user’s actions change the system model Interaction Model (IM)

27. Mobile IM vs Desktop IM

28. WHAT IF WE create a new interaction model to INTERACT WITH MOBILE DEVICES?

29. HOW?

30. wireless and omnipresent learning using mobile devices Mobile Learning

31. Mobile Phones as Collaborative Tools

32. analysis, synthesis and evaluation Active Learning

33. use of images and and animation Visual Learning

36. Mind Maps are Active Learning Tools

37. from Paper to Phone

38. Current Problems Lacks spontaneity and accuracy in plotting down nodes Lacks emphasis on important nodes Lacks the ability to look at mind maps at multiple perspectives Difficulty in navigation when mind maps become bigger Bears little resemblance to real world mind maps

39. Current Problems Lacks spontaneity and accuracy in plotting down nodes Lacks emphasis on important nodes Lacks the ability to look at mind maps at multiple perspectives Difficulty in navigation when mind maps become bigger Bears little resemblance to real world mind maps

40. Current Problems Lacks spontaneity and accuracy in plotting down nodes Lacks emphasis on important nodes Lacks the ability to look at mind maps at multiple perspectives Difficulty in navigation when mind maps become bigger Bears little resemblance to real world mind maps

41. Current Problems Lacks spontaneity and accuracy in plotting down nodes Lacks emphasis on important nodes Lacks the ability to look at mind maps at multiple perspectives Difficulty in navigationwhen mind maps become bigger Bears little resemblance to real world mind maps

42. Current Problems Lacks spontaneity and accuracy in plotting down nodes Lacks emphasis on important nodes Lacks the ability to look at mind maps at multiple perspectives Difficulty in navigation when mind maps become bigger Bears little resemblance to real world mind maps

43. WHAT IF WE create a new interaction model to INTERACT WITH MOBILE DEVICES USING THE PROBLEM OF MIND MAPS?

44. 1 highly interactive 3D mobile application framework 2 Novel GUI Paradigm for Mobile Mind Mapping Applications

45. Changing the Paradigm 1 2 3 4 MODEL FRAME-WORK PROTO-TYPES TESTS

46. Changing the Paradigm WHAT IF WE REDUCE THE GAP? 1 MODEL

47. Changing the Paradigm WHAT IF WE REORGANIZE EXPECTATIONS? 1 2 MODEL FRAME-WORK

48. Changing the Paradigm WHAT IF WE REIMAGINE METAPHORS? 1 2 3 MODEL FRAME-WORK PROTO-TYPES

49. Changing the Paradigm WHAT IF WE REMIX DIFFERENT TECHNIQUES? 1 2 3 4 MODEL FRAME-WORK PROTO-TYPES TESTS

50. Changing the Paradigm Run three groups of students, each group using existing created GUI prototypes. Run two groups of students, one group using traditional mind maps, other group using proposed GUI prototype Run two groups of students, one group using existing mobile mind map, other group using proposed GUI prototype Generalities: Non-IT Uni students will be supplied with 4 Nokia N78 equipped with logging software to TESTS track the frequency of usage in a particular span of time. At the end of the trial, participants will answer a small questionnaire derived from perceived enjoyment and ease of use using a 5-point Lickert scale to express their feelings

51. A New Paradigm Shift

52. Novel Graphical User Interface (GUI) Paradigm on Mobile Mind Mapping Applications RadenSucalit e: raden.sucalit@jcu.edu.au Dr. Jason Holdsworth Supervisor ? http://project.brownmestizo.net Project Blog