More Related Content Similar to Wef tt competitiveness_report_2013 (20) More from Elizabeth Wada (20) Wef tt competitiveness_report_20131. The Travel & Tourism
Competitiveness
Report 2013
Reducing Barriers to Economic Growth and Job Creation
Insight Report
Jennifer Blanke and Thea Chiesa, editors
3. Insight Report
Jennifer Blanke
Thea Chiesa
Editors
The Travel & Tourism
Competitiveness
Report 2013
Reducing Barriers to Economic Growth and Job Creation
© 2013 World Economic Forum
4. The Travel & Tourism Competitiveness Report 2013
is published by the World Economic Forum within
the framework of The Global Competitiveness and
Benchmarking Network and the Industry Partnership
Programme for Aviation, Travel & Tourism.
Professor Klaus Schwab
Executive Chairman
Børge Brende
Managing Director, Government Relations and
Constituents Engagement
Robert Greenhill
Managing Director, Chief Business Officer
John Moavenzadeh
Senior Director, Head of Mobility Industries
EDITORS
Jennifer Blanke, Senior Director, Lead Economist,
Head of The Global Competitiveness and
Benchmarking Network
Thea Chiesa, Director, Head of Aviation,
Travel & Tourism
THE GLOBAL COMPETITIVENESS AND BENCHMARKING NETWORK
Beñat Bilbao-Osorio, Associate Director,
Senior Economist
Ciara Browne, Associate Director
Roberto Crotti, Quantitative Economist
Margareta Drzeniek Hanouz, Director, Senior Economist,
Head of Competitiveness Research
Brindusa Fidanza, Associate Director, Environmental
Initiatives
Thierry Geiger, Associate Director, Economist
Tania Gutknecht, Community Manager
Caroline Ko, Junior Economist
Cecilia Serin, Team Coordinator
We thank Hope Steele for her excellent editing work and
Neil Weinberg for his superb graphic design and layout.
The terms country and nation as used in this report do
not in all cases refer to a territorial entity that is a state
as understood by international law and practice. The
terms cover well-defined, geographically self-contained
economic areas that may not be states but for which
statistical data are maintained on a separate and
independent basis.
World Economic Forum
Geneva
Copyright © 2013
by the World Economic Forum
All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be
reproduced, stored in a retrieval system, or transmitted,
in any form or by any means, electronic, mechanical,
photocopying, or otherwise without the prior permission of
the World Economic Forum.
ISBN-13: 978-92-95044-40-1
ISBN-10: 92-95044-40-1
This report is printed on paper suitable for recycling and
made from fully managed and sustained forest sources.
Printed and bound in Switzerland by SRO-Kundig.
The full edition of the Report, with profiles of all 140
economies as well as an interactive data platform, is
available at www.weforum.org/ttcr.
© 2013 World Economic Forum
5. The Travel & Tourism Competitiveness Report 2013 | iii
Partner Institutes v
Preface xiii
by Børge Brende and Robert Greenhill,
World Economic Forum
Executive Summary xv
by Jennifer Blanke and Thea Chiesa, World Economic
Forum
Part 1: Selected Issues of T&T Competitiveness
1.1 The Travel & Tourism Competitiveness 3
Index 2013: Contributing to National Growth
and Employment
by Jennifer Blanke, Thea Chiesa, and Roberto Crotti,
World Economic Forum
1.2 How to Succeed as a Tourism 43
Destination in a Volatile World
by Jürgen Ringbeck and Timm Pietsch, Booz & Company
1.3 Visa Facilitation: Stimulating Economic 49
Growth and Development through Tourism
by Dirk Glaesser and John Kester, with Márcio Favilla,
Sandra Carvão, Lorna Hartantyo, Birka Valentin, Lisa
Fürbaß, Kate Holmes, Jacinta García, and Alberto G.
Uceda, World Tourism Organization (UNWTO)
1.4 The Economic Benefits of Aviation 57
and Performance in the Travel & Tourism
Competitiveness Index
by Julie Perovic, International Air Transport Association
(IATA)
1.5 Travel & Tourism as a Driver 63
of Employment Growth
by Rochelle Turner, World Travel & Tourism Council, and
Zachary Sears, Oxford Economics
1.6 Competiveness, Jobs, and Green 71
Growth: A “Glocal” Model
by Geoffrey Lipman, Greenearth.travel and Victoria
University Melbourne, and Terry Delacy and Paul
Whitelaw, Victoria University Melbourne
Part 2: Country/Economy Profiles and 79
Data Presentation
2.1 Country/Economy Profiles 81
How to Read the Country/Economy Profiles...................................83
Index of Countries/Economies.........................................................85
Country/Economy Profiles...............................................................86
2.2 Data Tables 367
How to Read the Data Tables........................................................369
Index of Data Tables......................................................................371
Data Tables...................................................................................373
Technical Notes and Sources 471
About the Authors 479
Acknowledgments 481
Contents
© 2013 World Economic Forum
7. The Travel & Tourism Competitiveness Report 2013 | v
The World Economic Forum’s Global Benchmarking
Network is pleased to acknowledge and thank the
following organizations as its valued Partner Institutes,
without which the realization of The Travel & Tourism
Competitiveness Report 2013 would not have
been feasible:
Albania
Institute for Contemporary Studies (ISB)
Artan Hoxha, President
Elira Jorgoni, Senior Expert
Endrit Kapaj, Expert
Algeria
Centre de Recherche en Economie Appliquée pour
le Développement (CREAD)
Youcef Benabdallah, Assistant Professor
Yassine Ferfera, Director
Argentina
IAE—Universidad Austral
Eduardo Luis Fracchia, Professor
Santiago Novoa, Project Manager
Armenia
Economy and Values Research Center
Manuk Hergnyan, Chairman
Sevak Hovhannisyan, Board Member and Senior Associate
Gohar Malumyan, Research Associate
Australia
Australian Industry Group
Colleen Dowling, Senior Research Coordinator
Innes Willox, Chief Executive
Austria
Austrian Institute of Economic Research (WIFO)
Karl Aiginger, Director
Gerhard Schwarz, Coordinator, Survey Department
Azerbaijan
Azerbaijan Marketing Society
Fuad Aliyev, Deputy Chairman
Ashraf Hajiyev, Consultant
Bahrain
Bahrain Economic Development Board
Kamal Bin Ahmed, Minister of Transportation and Acting Chief
Executive of the Economic Development Board
Nada Azmi, Manager, Economic Planning and Development
Maryam Matter, Coordinator, Economic Planning and
Development
Bangladesh
Centre for Policy Dialogue (CPD)
Khondaker Golam Moazzem, Senior Research Fellow
Kishore Kumer Basak, Research Associate
Mustafizur Rahman, Executive Director
Barbados
Sir Arthur Lewis Institute of Social and Economic Studies,
University of West Indies (UWI)
Judy Whitehead, Director
Belgium
Vlerick Business School
Priscilla Boiardi, Associate, Competence Centre
Entrepreneurship, Governance and Strategy
Wim Moesen, Professor
Leo Sleuwaegen, Professor, Competence Centre
Entrepreneurship, Governance and Strategy
Benin
CAPOD—Conception et Analyse de Politiques de
Développement
Epiphane Adjovi, Director
Maria-Odile Attanasso, Deputy Coordinator
Fructueux Deguenonvo, Researcher
Bosnia and Herzegovina
MIT Center, School of Economics and Business in Sarajevo,
University of Sarajevo
Zlatko Lagumdzija, Professor
Zeljko Sain, Executive Director
Jasmina Selimovic, Assistant Director
Botswana
Botswana National Productivity Centre
Letsogile Batsetswe, Research Consultant and Statistician
Baeti Molake, Executive Director
Phumzile Thobokwe, Manager, Information and Research
Services Department
Brazil
Fundação Dom Cabral, Bradesco Innovation Center
Carlos Arruda, International Relations Director, Innovation
and Competitiveness Professor
Daniel Berger, Bachelor Student in Economics
Fabiana Madsen, Economist and Associate Researcher
Movimento Brasil Competitivo (MBC)
Carolina Aichinger, Project Coordinator
Erik Camarano, Chief Executive Officer
Brunei Darussalam
Ministry of Industry and Primary Resources
Pehin Dato Yahya Bakar, Minister
Normah Suria Hayati Jamil Al-Sufri, Permanent Secretary
Bulgaria
Center for Economic Development
Adriana Daganova, Expert, International Programmes and
Projects
Anelia Damianova, Senior Expert
Burkina Faso
lnstitut Supérieure des Sciences de la Population (ISSP),
University of Ouagadougou
Baya Banza, Director
Partner Institutes
© 2013 World Economic Forum
8. vi | The Travel & Tourism Competitiveness Report 2013
Partner Institutes
Burundi
University Research Centre for Economic and Social
Development (CURDES), National University of Burundi
Banderembako Deo, Director
Gilbert Niyongabo, Dean, Faculty of Economics &
Management
Cambodia
Economic Institute of Cambodia
Sok Hach, President
Sokheng Sam, Researcher
Cameroon
Comité de Compétitivité (Competitiveness Committee)
Lucien Sanzouango, Permanent Secretary
Canada
The Conference Board of Canada
Michael R. Bloom, Vice-President, Organizational
Effectiveness & Learning
Douglas Watt, Associate Director
Cape Verde
INOVE RESEARCH—Investigação e Desenvolvimento, Lda
Júlio Delgado, Partner and Senior Researcher
José Mendes, Chief Executive Officer
Sara França Silva, Project Manager
Chad
Groupe de Recherches Alternatives et de Monitoring du Projet
Pétrole-Tchad-Cameroun (GRAMP-TC)
Antoine Doudjidingao, Researcher
Gilbert Maoundonodji, Director
Celine Nénodji Mbaipeur, Programme Officer
Chile
Universidad Adolfo Ibáñez
Fernando Larrain Aninat, Director MBA
Leonidas Montes, Dean, School of Government
China
Institute of Economic System and Management, National
Development and Reform Commission
Chen Wei, Research Fellow
Dong Ying, Professor
Zhou Haichun, Deputy Director and Professor
China Center for Economic Statistics Research, Tianjin
University of Finance and Economics
Bojuan Zhao, Professor
Fan Yang, Professor Jian Wang, Associate Professor
Hongye Xiao, Professor
Lu Dong, Professor
Colombia
National Planning Department
Sara Patricia Rivera, Advisor
John Rodríguez, Coordinator, Competitiveness Observatory
Javier Villarreal, Enterprise Development Director
Colombian Private Council on Competitiveness
Rosario Córdoba, President
Marco Llinás, Vicepresident
Côte d’Ivoire
Chambre de Commerce et d’Industrie de Côte d’Ivoire
Jean-Louis Billon, President
Mamadou Sarr, Director General
Croatia
National Competitiveness Council
Jadranka Gable, Advisor
Kresimir Jurlin, Research Fellow
Cyprus
The European University
Bambos Papageorgiou, Head of Socioeconomic and
Academic Research
cdbbank—The Cyprus Development Bank
Maria Markidou-Georgiadou, Manager, Business Development
and Special Projects
Czech Republic
CMC Graduate School of Business
Tomas Janca, Executive Director
Denmark
Danish Technological Institute, Center for Policy and Business
Development
Hanne Shapiro, Center Manager
Ecuador
ESPAE Graduate School of Management, Escuela Superior
Politécnica del Litoral (ESPOL)
Elizabeth Arteaga, Project Assistant
Virginia Lasio, Director
Sara Wong, Professor
Egypt
The Egyptian Center for Economic Studies (ECES)
Iman Al-Ayouty, Senior Economist
Omneia Helmy, Acting Executive Director and Director
of Research
Estonia
Estonian Institute of Economic Research
Evelin Ahermaa, Head of Economic Research Sector
Marje Josing, Director
Estonian Development Fund
Kitty Kubo, Head of Foresight
Ott Pärna, Chief Executive Officer
Ethiopia
African Institute of Management, Development and
Governance
Zebenay Kifle, General Manager
Tegenge Teka, Senior Expert
Finland
ETLA—The Research Institute of the Finnish Economy
Markku Kotilainen, Research Director
Petri Rouvinen, Research Director
Pekka Ylä-Anttila, Managing Director
France
HEC School of Management, Paris
Bertrand Moingeon, Professor and Deputy Dean
Bernard Ramanantsoa, Professor and Dean
Gabon
Confédération Patronale Gabonaise
Regis Loussou Kiki, General Secretary
Gina Eyama Ondo, Assistant General Secretary
Henri Claude Oyima, President
Gambia, The
Gambia Economic and Social Development Research Institute
(GESDRI)
Makaireh A. Njie, Director
Georgia
Business Initiative for Reforms in Georgia
Tamara Janashia, Executive Director
Giga Makharadze, Founding Member of the Board of Directors
Mamuka Tsereteli, Founding Member of the Board of Directors
© 2013 World Economic Forum
9. The Travel & Tourism Competitiveness Report 2013 | vii
Partner Institutes
Germany
WHU—Otto Beisheim School of Management
Ralf Fendel, Professor of Monetary Economics
Michael Frenkel, Professor, Chair of Macroeconomics and
International Economics
Ghana
Association of Ghana Industries (AGI)
Patricia Addy, Projects Officer
Nana Owusu-Afari, President
Seth Twum-Akwaboah, Executive Director
Greece
SEV Hellenic Federation of Enterprises
Michael Mitsopoulos, Senior Advisor, Entrepreneurship
Thanasis Printsipas, Economist, Entrepreneurship
Guatemala
FUNDESA
Felipe Bosch G., President of the Board of Directors
Pablo Schneider, Economic Director
Juan Carlos Zapata, General Manager
Guinea
Confédération Patronale des Entreprises de Guinée
Mohamed Bénogo Conde, Secretary-General
Guyana
Institute of Development Studies, University of Guyana
Karen Pratt, Research Associate
Clive Thomas, Director
Haiti
Group Croissance SA
Pierre Lenz Dominique, Coordinator, Survey Department
Kesner Pharel, Chief Executive Officer and Chairman
Hong Kong SAR
Hong Kong General Chamber of Commerce
David O’Rear, Chief Economist
Federation of Hong Kong Industries
Alexandra Poon, Director
The Chinese General Chamber of Commerce
Hungary
KOPINT-TÁRKI Economic Research Ltd.
Éva Palócz, Chief Executive Officer
Peter Vakhal, Project Manager
Iceland
Innovation Center Iceland
Ardis Armannsdottir, Marketing Manager
Karl Fridriksson, Managing Director of Human Resources
and Marketing
Thorsteinn I. Sigfusson, Director
India
Confederation of Indian Industry (CII)
Chandrajit Banerjee, Director General
Marut Sengupta, Deputy Director General
Gantakolla Srivastava, Head, Financial Services
Indonesia
Center for Industry, SME & Business Competition Studies,
University of Trisakti
Tulus Tambunan, Professor and Director
Iran, Islamic Republic of
The Center for Economic Studies and Surveys (CESS), Iran
Chamber of Commerce, Industries, Mines and Agriculture
Mohammad Janati Fard, Research Associate
Hamed Nikraftar, Project Manager
Farnaz Safdari, Research Associate
Ireland
Institute for Business Development and Competitiveness
School of Economics, University College Cork
Justin Doran, Principal Associate
Eleanor Doyle, Director
Catherine Kavanagh, Principal Associate
Forfás, Economic Analysis and Competitiveness Department
Adrian Devitt, Manager
Conor Hand, Economist
Israel
Manufacturers’ Association of Israel (MAI)
Dan Catarivas, Director
Amir Hayek, Managing Director
Zvi Oren, President
Italy
SDA Bocconi School of Management
Secchi Carlo, Full Professor of Economic Policy, Bocconi
University
Paola Dubini, Associate Professor, Bocconi University
Francesco A. Saviozzi, SDA Professor, Strategic and
Entrepreneurial Management Department
Jamaica
Mona School of Business (MSB), The University of the West
Indies
Patricia Douce, Project Administrator
Evan Duggan, Executive Director and Professor
William Lawrence, Director, Professional Services Unit
Japan
Keio University
Yoko Ishikura, Professor, Graduate School of Media Design
Heizo Takenaka, Director, Global Security Research Institute
Jiro Tamura, Professor of Law, Keio University
Keizai Doyukai (Japan Association of Corporate Executives)
Kiyohiko Ito, Managing Director, Keizai Doyukai
Jordan
Ministry of Planning & International Cooperation
Jordan National Competitiveness Team
Kawther Al-Zou’bi, Head of Competitiveness Division
Basma Arabiyat, Researcher
Mukhallad Omari, Director of Policies and Studies Department
Kazakhstan
National Analytical Centre
Diana Tamabayeva, Project Manager
Vladislav Yezhov, Chairman
Kenya
Institute for Development Studies, University of Nairobi
Mohamud Jama, Director and Associate Research Professor
Paul Kamau, Senior Research Fellow
Dorothy McCormick, Research Professor
Korea, Republic of
College of Business School, Korea Advanced Institute of
Science and Technology KAIST
Byungtae Lee, Acting Dean
Soung-Hie Kim, Associate Dean and Professor
Jinyung Cha, Assistant Director, Exchange Programme
Korea Development Institute
Joohee Cho, Senior Research Associate
Yongsoo Lee, Head, Policy Survey Unit
Kuwait
Kuwait National Competitiveness Committee
Adel Al-Husainan, Committee Member
Fahed Al-Rashed, Committee Chairman
Sayer Al-Sayer, Committee Member
© 2013 World Economic Forum
10. viii | The Travel & Tourism Competitiveness Report 2013
Partner Institutes
Kyrgyz Republic
Economic Policy Institute “Bishkek Consensus”
Lola Abduhametova, Program Coordinator
Marat Tazabekov, Chairman
Latvia
Stockholm School of Economics in Riga
Karlis Kreslins, EMBA Programme Director
Anders Paalzow, Rector
Lebanon
Bader Young Entrepreneurs Program
Antoine Abou-Samra, Managing Director
Farah Shamas, Program Coordinator
Lesotho
Private Sector Foundation of Lesotho
O.S.M. Moosa, President
Thabo Qhesi, Chief Executive Officer
Nteboheleng Thaele, Researcher
Libya
Libya Development Policy Center
Yusser Al-Gayed, Project Director
Ahmed Jehani, Chairman
Mohamed Wefati, Director
Lithuania
Statistics Lithuania
Ona Grigiene, Deputy Head, Knowledge Economy
and Special Surveys Statistics Division
Vilija Lapeniene, Director General
Gediminas Samuolis, Head, Knowledge Economy
and Special Surveys Statistics Division
Luxembourg
Luxembourg Chamber of Commerce
Christel Chatelain, Research Analyst
Stephanie Musialski, Research Analyst
Carlo Thelen, Chief Economist, Member of the
Managing Board
Macedonia, FYR
National Entrepreneurship and Competitiveness
Council (NECC)
Mirjana Apostolova, President of the Assembly
Dejan Janevski, Project Coordinator
Madagascar
Centre of Economic Studies, University of Antananarivo
Ravelomanana Mamy Raoul, Director
Razato Rarijaona Simon, Executive Secretary
Malawi
Malawi Confederation of Chambers of Commerce and
Industry
Hope Chavula, Public Private Dialogue Manager
Chancellor L. Kaferapanjira, Chief Executive Officer
Malaysia
Institute of Strategic and International Studies (ISIS)
Jorah Ramlan, Senior Analyst, Economics
Steven C.M. Wong, Senior Director, Economics
Mahani Zainal Abidin, Chief Executive
Malaysia Productivity Corporation (MPC)
Mohd Razali Hussain, Director General
Lee Saw Hoon, Senior Director
Mali
Groupe de Recherche en Economie Appliquée et
Théorique (GREAT)
Massa Coulibaly, Executive Director
Malta
Competitive Malta—Foundation for National Competitiveness
Margrith Lutschg-Emmenegger, Vice President
Adrian Said, Chief Coordinator
Caroline Sciortino, Research Coordinator
Mauritania
Centre d’Information Mauritanien pour le Développement
Economique et Technique (CIMDET/CCIAM)
Lô Abdoul, Consultant and Analyst
Mehla Mint Ahmed, Director
Habib Sy, Administrative Agent and Analyst
Mauritius
Board of Investment of Mauritius
Nirmala Jeetah, Director, Planning and Policy
Ken Poonoosamy, Managing Director
Joint Economic Council
Raj Makoond, Director
Mexico
Center for Intellectual Capital and Competitiveness
Erika Ruiz Manzur, Executive Director
René Villarreal Arrambide, President and Chief Executive
Officer
Rodrigo David Villarreal Ramos, Director
Instituto Mexicano para la Competitividad (IMCO)
Priscila Garcia, Researcher
Manuel Molano, Deputy General Director
Juan E. Pardinas, General Director
Ministry of the Economy
Jose Antonio Torre, Undersecretary for Competitiveness
and Standardization
Enrique Perret Erhard, Technical Secretary for
Competitiveness
Narciso Suarez, Research Director, Technical Secretary
for Competitiveness
Moldova
Academy of Economic Studies of Moldova (AESM)
Grigore Belostecinic, Rector
Centre for Economic Research (CER)
Corneliu Gutu, Director
Mongolia
Open Society Forum (OSF)
Munkhsoyol Baatarjav, Manager of Economic Policy
Erdenejargal Perenlei, Executive Director
Montenegro
Institute for Strategic Studies and Prognoses (ISSP)
Maja Drakic, Project Manager
Petar Ivanovic, Chief Executive Officer
Veselin Vukotic, President
Morocco
Comité National de l’Environnement des Affaires
Seloua Benmbarek, Head of Mission
Mozambique
EconPolicy Research Group, Lda.
Peter Coughlin, Director
Donaldo Miguel Soares, Researcher
Ema Marta Soares, Assistant
Namibia
Institute for Public Policy Research (IPPR)
Graham Hopwood, Executive Director
© 2013 World Economic Forum
11. The Travel & Tourism Competitiveness Report 2013 | ix
Partner Institutes
Nepal
Centre for Economic Development and Administration (CEDA)
Ramesh Chandra Chitrakar, Professor, Country Coordinator
and Project Director
Mahendra Raj Joshi, Member
Hari Dhoj Pant, Officiating Executive Director, Advisor, Survey
project
Netherlands
INSCOPE: Research for Innovation, Erasmus University
Rotterdam
Frans A. J. Van den Bosch, Professor
Henk W. Volberda, Director and Professor
New Zealand
The New Zealand Initiative
Catherine Harland, Research Fellow
Oliver Hartwich, Executive Director
Nigeria
Nigerian Economic Summit Group (NESG)
Frank Nweke Jr., Director General
Chris Okpoko, Associate Director, Research
Foluso Phillips, Chairman
Norway
BI Norwegian Business School
Eskil Goldeng, Researcher
Torger Reve, Professor
Oman
The International Research Foundation
Salem Ben Nasser Al-Ismaily, Chairman
Public Authority for Investment Promotion and Export
Development (PAIPED)
Mehdi Ali Juma, Expert for Economic Research
Pakistan
Mishal Pakistan
Puruesh Chaudhary, Director Content
Amir Jahangir, Chief Executive Officer
Paraguay
Centro de Análisis y Difusión de Economia Paraguaya
(CADEP)
Dionisio Borda, Research Member
Fernando Masi, Director
María Belén Servín, Research Member
Peru
Centro de Desarrollo Industrial (CDI), Sociedad Nacional
de Industrias
Néstor Asto, Project Director
Luis Tenorio, Executive Director
Philippines
Makati Business Club (MBC)
Michael B. Mundo, Chief Economist
Marc P. Opulencia, Deputy Director
Peter Angelo V. Perfecto, Executive Director
Management Association of the Philippines (MAP)
Arnold P. Salvador, Executive Director
Poland
Economic Institute, National Bank of Poland
Piotr Boguszewski, Advisor
Jarosław T. Jakubik, Deputy Director
Portugal
PROFORUM, Associação para o Desenvolvimento da
Engenharia
Ilídio António de Ayala Serôdio, Vice President of the Board
of Directors
Fórum de Administradores de Empresas (FAE)
Paulo Bandeira, General Director
Pedro do Carmo Costa, Member of the Board of Directors
Esmeralda Dourado, President of the Board of Directors
Puerto Rico
Puerto Rico 2000, Inc.
Ivan Puig, President
Instituto de Competitividad Internacional, Universidad
Interamericana de Puerto Rico
Francisco Montalvo, Project Coordinator
Qatar
Qatari Businessmen Association (QBA)
Sarah Abdallah, Deputy General Manager
Issa Abdul Salam Abu Issa, Secretary-General
Social and Economic Survey Research Institute (SESRI)
Hanan Abdul Ibrahim, Associate Director
Darwish Al Emadi, Director
Romania
SC VBD Alliance Consulting Srl
Irina Ion, Program Coordinator
Rolan Orzan, General Director
Russian Federation
Bauman Innovation & Eurasia Competitiveness Institute
Katerina Marandi, Programme Manager
Alexey Prazdnichnykh, Principal and Managing Director
Stockholm School of Economics, Russia
Igor Dukeov, Area Principal
Carl F. Fey, Associate Dean of Research
Rwanda
Private Sector Federation (PSF)
Hannington Namara, Chief Executive Officer
Andrew O. Rwigyema, Head of Research and Policy
Saudi Arabia
National Competitiveness Center (NCC)
Awwad Al-Awwad, President
Khaldon Mahasen, Vice President
Senegal
Centre de Recherches Economiques Appliquées (CREA),
University of Dakar
Diop Ibrahima Thione, Director
Serbia
Foundation for the Advancement of Economics (FREN)
Mihail Arandarenko, Director
Aleksandar Radivojevic, Project Coordinator
Bojan Ristic, Researcher
Seychelles
Plutus Auditing & Accounting Services
Nicolas Boulle, Partner
Marco L. Francis, Partner
Singapore
Economic Development Board
Anna Chan, Assistant Managing Director, Planning & Policy
Cheng Wai San, Head, Research & Statistics Unit
Teo Xinyu, Executive, Research & Statistics Unit
Slovak Republic
Business Alliance of Slovakia (PAS)
Robert Kicina, Executive Director
© 2013 World Economic Forum
12. x | The Travel & Tourism Competitiveness Report 2013
Partner Institutes
Slovenia
Institute for Economic Research
Peter Stanovnik, Professor
Sonja Uršic, Senior Research Assistant
University of Ljubljana, Faculty of Economics
Mateja Drnovšek, Professor
Aleš Vahcic, Professor
South Africa
Business Leadership South Africa
Friede Dowie, Director
Thero Setiloane, Chief Executive Officer
Business Unity South Africa
Nomaxabiso Majokweni, Chief Executive Officer
Joan Stott, Executive Director, Economic Policy
Spain
IESE Business School, International Center for
Competitiveness
María Luisa Blázquez, Research Associate
Antoni Subirà, Professor
Sri Lanka
Institute of Policy Studies of Sri Lanka (IPS)
Ayodya Galappattige, Research Officer
Dilani Hirimuthugodage, Research Officer
Saman Kelegama, Executive Director
Suriname
Suriname Trade & Industry Association (VSB)
Helen Doelwijt, Executive Secretary
Rene van Essen, Director
Dayenne Wielingen Verwey, Economic Policy Officer
Swaziland
Federation of Swaziland Employers and Chamber of
Commerce
Mduduzi Lokotfwako, Research Analyst
Zodwa Mabuza, Chief Executive Officer
Nyakwesi Motsa, Administration & Finance Manager
Sweden
International University of Entrepreneurship and Technology
Niclas Adler, President
Switzerland
University of St. Gallen, Executive School of Management,
Technology and Law (ES-HSG)
Rubén Rodriguez Startz, Head of Project
Tobias Trütsch, Communications Manager
Taiwan, China
Council for Economic Planning and Development, Executive
Yuan
Hung, J. B., Director, Economic Research Department
Shieh, Chung Chung, Researcher, Economic Research
Department
Wu, Ming-Ji, Deputy Minister
Tajikistan
The Center for Sociological Research “Zerkalo”
Rahima Ashrapova, Assistant Researcher
Qahramon Baqoev, Director
Gulnora Beknazarova, Researcher
Tanzania
Research on Poverty Alleviation (REPOA)
Cornel Jahari, Assistant Researcher
Johansein Rutaihwa, Commissioned Researcher
Samuel Wangwe, Professor and Executive Director
Thailand
Sasin Graduate Institute of Business Administration,
Chulalongkorn University
Pongsak Hoontrakul, Senior Research Fellow
Narudee Kiengsiri, President of Sasin Alumni Association
Toemsakdi Krishnamra, Director of Sasin
Thailand Development Research Institute (TDRI)
Somchai Jitsuchon, Research Director
Chalongphob Sussangkarn, Distinguished Fellow
Yos Vajragupta, Senior Researcher
Timor-Leste
East Timor Development Agency (ETDA)
Jose Barreto, Survey Manager
Palmira Pires, Director
Chambers of Commerce and Industry of Timor-Leste
Kathleen Fon Ha Tchong Goncalves, Vice-President
Trinidad and Tobago
Arthur Lok Jack Graduate School of Business
Miguel Carillo, Executive Director and Professor of Strategy
Nirmala Harrylal, Director, Internationalisation and Institutional
Relations Centre
The Competitiveness Company
Rolph Balgobin, Chairman
Tunisia
Institut Arabe des Chefs d’Entreprises
Ahmed Bouzguenda, President
Majdi Hassen, Executive Counsellor
Turkey
TUSIAD Sabanci University Competitiveness Forum
Izak Atiyas, Director
Selcuk Karaata, Vice Director
Sezen Ugurlu, Project Specialist
Uganda
Kabano Research and Development Centre
Robert Apunyo, Program Manager
Delius Asiimwe, Executive Director
Francis Mukuya, Research Associate
Ukraine
CASE Ukraine, Center for Social and Economic Research
Dmytro Boyarchuk, Executive Director
Vladimir Dubrovskiy, Leading Economist
United Arab Emirates
Abu Dhabi Department of Economic Development
H.E. Mohammed Omar Abdulla, Undersecretary
Dubai Economic Council
H.E. Hani Al Hamly, Secretary General
Institute for Social and Economic Research (ISER), Zayed
University
Mouawiya Alawad, Director
Emirates Competitiveness Council
H.E. Abdulla Nasser Lootah, Secretary General
United Kingdom
LSE Enterprise Ltd, London School of Economics and
Political Science
Adam Austerfield, Director of Projects
Niccolo Durazzi, Project Manager
Robyn Klingler Vidra, Researcher
Uruguay
Universidad ORT Uruguay
Isidoro Hodara, Professor
© 2013 World Economic Forum
13. The Travel & Tourism Competitiveness Report 2013 | xi
Partner Institutes
Venezuela
CONAPRI—The Venezuelan Council for Investment Promotion
Litsay Guerrero, Economic Affairs and Investor Services
Manager
Eduardo Porcarelli, Executive Director
Vietnam
Ho Chi Minh City Institute for Development Studies (HIDS)
Nguyen Trong Hoa, Professor and President
Du Phuoc Tan, Head of Department
Trieu Thanh Son, Researcher
Yemen
Yemeni Businessmen Club (YBC)
Mohammed Esmail Hamanah, Executive Manager
Fathi Abdulwasa Hayel Saeed, Chairman
Moneera Abdo Othman, Project Coordinator
MARcon Marketing Consulting
Margret Arning, Managing Director
Zambia
Institute of Economic and Social Research (INESOR),
University of Zambia
Patricia Funjika, Research Fellow
Jolly Kamwanga, Senior Research Fellow and Project
Coordinator
Mubiana Macwan’gi, Director and Professor
Zimbabwe
Graduate School of Management, University of Zimbabwe
A. M. Hawkins, Professor
Bolivia, Costa Rica, Dominican Republic, Ecuador,
El Salvador, Honduras, Nicaragua, Panama
INCAE Business School, Latin American Center for
Competitiveness and Sustainable Development (CLACDS)
Ronald Arce, Researcher
Arturo Condo, Rector
Marlene de Estrella, Director of External Relations
Lawrence Pratt, Director
Liberia and Sierra Leone
FJP Development and Management Consultants
Omodele R. N. Jones, Chief Executive Officer
© 2013 World Economic Forum
15. The Travel & Tourism Competitiveness Report 2013 | xiii
The World Economic Forum has, for the past seven
years, engaged key industry and thought leaders
through its Aviation, Travel & Tourism Industry
Partnership Programme, along with its Global Agenda
Council on New Models for Travel & Tourism, to carry
out an in-depth analysis of the T&T competitiveness
of economies around the world. The resulting Travel &
Tourism Competitiveness Report provides a platform for
multi-stakeholder dialogue to ensure the development
of strong and sustainable T&T industries capable
of contributing effectively to international economic
development. The theme of this year’s Report,
“Reducing Barriers to Economic Growth and Job
Creation,” reflects the importance of the sector for this
purpose.
Encouraging the development of the Travel &
Tourism (T&T) sector is all the more important today
given its important role in job creation, at a time when
many countries are suffering from high unemployment.
The sector already accounts for 9 percent of GDP, a total
of US$6 trillion, and it provides 120 million direct jobs
and another 125 million indirect jobs in related industries.
This means that the industry now accounts for one in
eleven jobs on the planet, a number that could even rise
to one in ten jobs by 2022, according to the World Travel
& Tourism Council.
This edition of the Report comes at an uncertain
time for the T&T sector. Although the global economy is
showing signs of fragile recovery, the world is becoming
increasingly complex and interconnected. In this
context, it is notable that the T&T sector has remained
remarkably resilient in a number of ways. The number
of travelers has increased consistently over the past
year, notwithstanding the difficult economic climate
and shrinking budgets. Indeed, the UNWTO reports
that international tourist arrivals grew by 4 percent in
2012, and forecasts that they will continue to increase
by 3 percent to 4 percent in 2013. Although this trend
is primarily driven by increasing demand from the
emerging-market middle class, the picture has also been
brightening for many developed economies.
The industry has responded to the changing
environment with a number of structural adjustments.
Indeed, 2012 witnessed a number of alliances,
mergers, and strategic investments both in the aviation
industry and in online travel services. Resilience has
also been demonstrated in the way that some aviation
companies responded to erratic fuel prices by exploring
new business models and acquiring energy assets.
Additionally, industry players have made commitments
to a low-carbon economy through several initiatives
aimed at optimizing operations, retrofitting, recycling, and
preserving the environment.
Yet despite these many positive developments, the
need for greater openness remains one of the major
trends impacting the T&T sector, especially with regard
to the freer movement of people. The importance of
efforts in this area has been highlighted specifically
by the G20 Los Cabos communiqué in June 2012, in
which the group recognized the importance of tourism
“as a vehicle for job creation, economic growth and
development” and furthermore committed to “work
towards developing travel facilitation initiatives in support
of job creation, quality work, poverty reduction and
global growth.”
At the core of the Report is the fifth edition of the
Travel & Tourism Competitiveness Index (TTCI). The
aim of the TTCI, which covers a record 140 economies
this year, is to provide a comprehensive strategic tool
for measuring the “factors and policies that make
it attractive to develop the T&T sector in different
countries.” By providing detailed assessments of the T&T
environments of countries worldwide, the results can be
used by all stakeholders to work together to improve the
industry’s competitiveness in their national economies,
thereby contributing to national growth and prosperity. It
also allows countries to track their progress over time in
the various areas measured.
The full Report is downloadable from www.weforum.
org/ttcr; this contains detailed profiles for each of the 140
economies featured in the study, as well as an extensive
section of data tables with global rankings covering
over 75 indicators included in the TTCI. In addition,
it includes insightful contributions from a number of
industry experts. These chapters explore issues such as
how visa facilitation can play a relevant role in stimulating
economic growth, the importance of policymakers
leveraging local competitive advantages to thrive in a
volatile environment, the impact of the tourism sector
on employment creation, how the connectivity that the
Preface
BØRGE BRENDE AND ROBERT GREENHILL
World Economic Forum
© 2013 World Economic Forum
16. xiv | The Travel & Tourism Competitiveness Report 2013
Preface
aviation sector creates sustains economic development,
and the essential role of green growth in enhancing the
resilience of the sector.
The Travel & Tourism Competitiveness Report
2013 could not have been put together without the
distinguished thinkers who have shared with us
their knowledge and experience. We are grateful
to our Strategic Design Partner Booz & Company,
and our Data Partners Deloitte, the International Air
Transport Association (IATA), the International Union
for Conservation of Nature (IUCN), the World Tourism
Organization (UNWTO), and the World Travel & Tourism
Council (WTTC) for helping us to design and develop the
TTCI and for providing much of the industry-relevant data
used in its calculation. We thank our Industry Partners
in this Report—namely Airbus/EADS, BAE Systems,
Bahrain Economic Development Board, Bombardier,
Delta, Deutsche Lufthansa/Swiss, Embraer, Etihad
Airways, Jet Airways, Hilton, Lockheed Martin, Marriott,
Safran, Starwood Hotels & Resorts, and VISA—for their
support in this important venture.
We also wish to thank the editors of the Report,
Jennifer Blanke and Thea Chiesa, as well as the
project manager, Roberto Crotti, for their energy and
their commitment to the project. Appreciation goes to
other members of the competitiveness team: Beñat
Bilbao-Osorio, Ciara Browne, Margareta Drzeniek
Hanouz, Thierry Geiger, Tania Gutknecht, Caroline Ko,
and Cecilia Serin. Finally, we would like to convey our
sincere gratitude to our network of 150 Partner Institutes
worldwide, without whose hard work the annual
administration of the Executive Opinion Survey and this
Report would not be possible.
© 2013 World Economic Forum
17. Executive Summary
The Travel & Tourism Competitiveness Report 2013 | xv
Executive Summary
JENNIFER BLANKE AND THEA CHIESA
World Economic Forum
The Travel & Tourism (T&T) industry has managed to
remain relatively resilient over the recent year despite
the uncertain global economic outlook, which has
been characterized by fragile global economic growth,
macroeconomic tensions, and high unemployment in
many countries. Indeed, the sector has benefitted from
the continuing globalization process: travel has been
increasing in mature markets and, particularly, has been
driven by the rising purchasing power of the growing
middle class in many developing economies.
In such a context, Travel & Tourism has continued
to be a critical sector for economic development and
for sustaining employment, in both advanced and
developing economies. A strong T&T sector contributes
in many ways to development and the economy. It
makes both direct contributions, by raising the national
income and improving the balance of payments, and
indirect contributions, via its multiplier effect and by
providing the basis for connecting countries, through
hard and soft infrastructure—attributes that are critical
for a country’s more general economic competitiveness.
Although developing the T&T sector provides
many benefits, numerous obstacles at the national level
continue to hinder its development. For this reason,
seven years ago the World Economic Forum, together
with its Industry and Data Partners, embarked on a
multi-year research effort aimed at exploring various
issues related to the T&T competitiveness of countries
around the world. This year’s Report is published under
the theme “Reducing Barriers to Economic Growth and
Job Creation,” which reflects the forward-looking attitude
of the sector as it aims to ensure strong growth going
into the future.
THE TRAVEL & TOURISM COMPETITIVENESS
INDEX
The Travel & Tourism Competitiveness Index (TTCI)
aims to measure the factors and policies that make it
attractive to develop the T&T sector in different countries.
The Index was developed in close collaboration
with our Strategic Design Partner Booz & Company
and our Data Partners Deloitte, the International Air
Transport Association (IATA), the International Union
for Conservation of Nature (IUCN), the World Tourism
Organization (UNWTO), and the World Travel & Tourism
Council (WTTC). We have also received important
feedback from a number of key companies that are
Industry Partners in the effort, namely Airbus/EADS, BAE
Systems, the Bahrain Economic Development Board,
Bombardier, Delta, Deutsche Lufthansa/Swiss, Embraer,
Etihad Airways, Hilton, Jet Airways, Lockheed Martin,
Marriott, Safran, Starwood Hotels & Resorts, and VISA.
The TTCI is based on three broad categories of
variables that facilitate or drive T&T competitiveness.
These categories are summarized into the three
subindexes of the Index: (1) the T&T regulatory
framework subindex; (2) the T&T business environment
and infrastructure subindex; and (3) the T&T human,
cultural, and natural resources subindex. The first
subindex captures those elements that are policy related
and generally under the purview of the government; the
second subindex captures elements of the business
environment and the “hard” infrastructure of each
economy; and the third subindex captures the “softer”
human, cultural, and natural elements of each country’s
resource endowments.
Each of these three subindexes is composed in turn
by a number of pillars of T&T competitiveness, of which
there are 14 in all. These are:
1. Policy rules and regulations
2. Environmental sustainability
3. Safety and security
4. Health and hygiene
5. Prioritization of Travel & Tourism
6. Air transport infrastructure
7. Ground transport infrastructure
8. Tourism infrastructure
9. ICT infrastructure
10. Price competitiveness in the T&T industry
11. Human resources
12. Affinity for Travel & Tourism
13. Natural resources
14. Cultural resources
Each of the pillars is, in turn, made up of a number
of individual variables. The dataset includes both survey
data from the World Economic Forum’s annual Executive
Opinion Survey (the Survey) and quantitative data from
publicly available sources, international organizations,
and T&T institutions and experts (for example, IATA, the
© 2013 World Economic Forum
18. Executive Summary
xvi | The Travel & Tourism Competitiveness Report 2013
Table 1: The Travel & Tourism Competitiveness Index 2013 and 2011 comparison
2013 2011
Country/Economy Rank/140 Score Rank/139
Switzerland 1 5.66 1
Germany 2 5.39 2
Austria 3 5.39 4
Spain 4 5.38 8
United Kingdom 5 5.38 7
United States 6 5.32 6
France 7 5.31 3
Canada 8 5.28 9
Sweden 9 5.24 5
Singapore 10 5.23 10
Australia 11 5.17 13
New Zealand 12 5.17 19
Netherlands 13 5.14 14
Japan 14 5.13 22
Hong Kong SAR 15 5.11 12
Iceland 16 5.10 11
Finland 17 5.10 17
Belgium 18 5.04 23
Ireland 19 5.01 21
Portugal 20 5.01 18
Denmark 21 4.98 16
Norway 22 4.95 20
Luxembourg 23 4.93 15
Malta 24 4.92 26
Korea, Rep. 25 4.91 32
Italy 26 4.90 27
Barbados 27 4.88 28
United Arab Emirates 28 4.86 30
Cyprus 29 4.84 24
Estonia 30 4.82 25
Czech Republic 31 4.78 31
Greece 32 4.75 29
Taiwan, China 33 4.71 37
Malaysia 34 4.70 35
Croatia 35 4.59 34
Slovenia 36 4.58 33
Panama 37 4.54 56
Seychelles 38 4.51 n/a
Hungary 39 4.51 38
Montenegro 40 4.50 36
Qatar 41 4.49 42
Poland 42 4.47 49
Thailand 43 4.47 41
Mexico 44 4.46 43
China 45 4.45 39
Turkey 46 4.44 50
Costa Rica 47 4.44 44
Latvia 48 4.43 51
Lithuania 49 4.39 55
Bulgaria 50 4.38 48
Brazil 51 4.37 52
Puerto Rico 52 4.36 45
Israel 53 4.34 46
Slovak Republic 54 4.32 54
Bahrain 55 4.30 40
Chile 56 4.29 57
Oman 57 4.29 61
Mauritius 58 4.28 53
Uruguay 59 4.23 58
Jordan 60 4.18 64
Argentina 61 4.17 60
Saudi Arabia 62 4.17 62
Russian Federation 63 4.16 59
South Africa 64 4.13 66
India 65 4.11 68
Georgia 66 4.10 73
Jamaica 67 4.08 65
Romania 68 4.04 63
Lebanon 69 4.04 70
Indonesia 70 4.03 74
2013 2011
Country/Economy Rank/140 Score Rank/139
Morocco 71 4.03 78
Brunei Darussalam 72 4.01 67
Peru 73 4.00 69
Sri Lanka 74 3.99 81
Macedonia, FYR 75 3.98 76
Ukraine 76 3.98 85
Albania 77 3.97 71
Azerbaijan 78 3.97 83
Armenia 79 3.96 90
Vietnam 80 3.95 80
Ecuador 81 3.93 87
Philippines 82 3.93 94
Trinidad and Tobago 83 3.93 79
Colombia 84 3.90 77
Egypt 85 3.88 75
Dominican Republic 86 3.88 72
Cape Verde 87 3.87 89
Kazakhstan 88 3.82 93
Serbia 89 3.78 82
Bosnia and Herzegovina 90 3.78 97
Namibia 91 3.77 84
Gambia, The 92 3.73 92
Honduras 93 3.72 88
Botswana 94 3.71 91
Nicaragua 95 3.67 100
Kenya 96 3.66 103
Guatemala 97 3.65 86
Iran, Islamic Rep. 98 3.64 114
Mongolia 99 3.63 101
Suriname 100 3.63 n/a
Kuwait 101 3.61 95
Moldova 102 3.60 99
Guyana 103 3.60 98
El Salvador 104 3.59 96
Rwanda 105 3.56 102
Cambodia 106 3.56 109
Senegal 107 3.49 104
Zambia 108 3.46 111
Tanzania 109 3.46 110
Bolivia 110 3.46 117
Kyrgyz Republic 111 3.45 107
Nepal 112 3.42 112
Venezuela 113 3.41 106
Tajikistan 114 3.41 118
Paraguay 115 3.39 123
Uganda 116 3.39 115
Ghana 117 3.38 108
Zimbabwe 118 3.33 119
Swaziland 119 3.31 116
Ethiopia 120 3.29 122
Cameroon 121 3.27 126
Pakistan 122 3.25 125
Bangladesh 123 3.24 129
Malawi 124 3.22 121
Mozambique 125 3.17 128
Côte d’Ivoire 126 3.15 131
Nigeria 127 3.14 130
Burkina Faso 128 3.12 132
Mali 129 3.11 133
Benin 130 3.09 120
Madagascar 131 3.09 127
Algeria 132 3.07 113
Yemen 133 2.96 n/a
Mauritania 134 2.91 136
Lesotho 135 2.89 135
Guinea 136 2.88 n/a
Sierra Leone 137 2.87 n/a
Burundi 138 2.82 137
Chad 139 2.61 139
Haiti 140 2.59 n/a
© 2013 World Economic Forum
19. Executive Summary
The Travel & Tourism Competitiveness Report 2013 | xvii
IUCN, the UNWTO, WTTC, UNCTAD, and UNESCO). The
Survey is carried out among chief executive officers and
top business leaders in all economies covered by our
research; these are the people making the investment
decisions in their respective economies. The Survey
provides unique data on many qualitative institutional
and business environment issues, as well as specific
issues related to the T&T industry and the quality of the
natural environment.
The details of the composition of the TTCI are
shown in Appendix A of Chapter 1.1; detailed rankings
and scores of this year’s Index are found in Appendix B
of that chapter.
THE TRAVEL & TOURISM COMPETITIVENESS
INDEX RANKINGS 2013
Table 1 shows the overall rankings of the 140 economies
assessed in this edition TTCI, comparing this year’s
rankings with those from the 2011 edition of the Report,.
Switzerland maintains its top position in the rankings,
which it has retained for five consecutive editions, since
the very first Travel & Tourism Competitiveness Report.
Tables 2–6 present the rankings in a regional context,
grouping economies into the following five regional
groups: Europe, the Americas, Asia Pacific (including
Central Asia), the Middle East and North Africa, and
sub-Saharan Africa. We discuss below a selection of
countries from each region to provide a sense of the
results and how they are interpreted at the national level.
More countries are discussed in detail in Chapter 1.1.
Europe
In line with statistics on international tourist arrivals,
Table 1 shows that Europe remains the leading region
for Travel & Tourism competitiveness, with all of the
top five places taken by European countries. Likewise,
13 of the top 20 countries are from the region. Table 2
shows the rankings for European countries only, with
the first column showing the rank within the region,
the second column showing the overall rank out of all
140 economies included in the Index this year, and the
third column showing the score. As the table shows,
Switzerland is ranked 1st out of all countries in the 2013
TTCI, a position it has held since the first edition of
this Report in 2007. Germany, Austria, Spain, and the
United Kingdom complete the top five, while France and
Sweden are among the top 10 overall.
Switzerland continues to lead the rankings,
performing well on almost all aspects of the Index.
Switzerland’s infrastructure, especially ground transport
(3rd), is among the best in the world. The country also
boasts top marks for its hotels and other tourism-specific
facilities, with excellent staff thanks to the availability of
qualified labor to work in the industry (ranked 2nd)—
perhaps not surprising in a country that holds many of
the world’s best hotel management schools. Switzerland
also attracts tourists because of its rich and well-
managed natural resources. A large percentage of the
country’s land area is protected, environmental regulation
is among the most stringent (3rd), and the T&T industry
is considered to be developed in a sustainable way
(7th). These good environmental conditions, combined
with the high safety and security of the country (2nd),
contribute to its solid T&T competitiveness. Switzerland
is not only a strong leisure tourism destination but also
an important business travel hub, with many international
fairs and exhibitions held in the country each year,
driving its showing on the cultural resources pillar (6th).
Switzerland’s strong performance in all these areas
enables the country to somewhat make up for its lack
of price competitiveness (139th), which, together with a
fairly restrained international visa policy, does indeed limit
the number of arrivals.
Germany ranks 2nd in Europe and out of all
countries in the TTCI. Similar to Switzerland, its
infrastructure is among the best in the world: it is ranked
6th for ground transport infrastructure and 7th for air
transport infrastructure, facilitating connections both
within the country and internationally. Germany also has
abundant cultural resources (ranked 5th worldwide for its
many World Heritage cultural sites) and is host to almost
600 international fairs and exhibition per year (2nd), while
hotel prices are relatively competitive (55th). In addition,
Germany makes great efforts to develop in a sustainable
way (4th), with the world’s most stringent environmental
regulations—which are also among the best-enforced—
and the strong support of international environmental
efforts, as demonstrated through its ratification of many
international environmental treaties.
Austria ranks 3rd, improving by one position since
2011. Its strong performance is driven by factors such as
tourism infrastructure, in which it ties for 1st place with
Italy; a welcoming attitude toward visitors; a very safe
and secure environment (7th); and, most importantly, its
rich cultural resources. Austria hosts nine World Heritage
cultural sites, has excellent creative industries, and
attracts many travelers with several fairs and exhibitions
organized every year. The country’s tourism industry is
also being developed in a sustainable way (10th), with
some of the most stringent (4th) and well-enforced (7th)
environmental regulations in the world, driving its overall
positive performance on environmental sustainability
(ranked 6th).
Spain is the country among the top 10 that sees
the most improvement since 2011: moving up four
places since the last assessment, it is now ranked 4th.
Spain continues to lead in cultural resources, ranking
1st this year in this area because of its extremely
numerous World Heritage sites (2nd) and its large
number of international fairs and exhibitions (3rd), as well
as its significant sports stadium capacity. Its tourism
infrastructure is another strength, with its many hotel
© 2013 World Economic Forum
20. Executive Summary
xviii | The Travel & Tourism Competitiveness Report 2013
rooms, car rental facilities, and ATMs. Furthermore, its
air transport infrastructure is highly developed and ranks
among the top 10 worldwide. Spain has improved in a
few areas since the last edition. In particular, starting
a business has become less costly and onerous,
according to the World Bank, and hotel prices have
come down a bit. The government has also kept tourism
high in its development agenda, making Spain a top
10 economy for prioritization of the industry. Spain has
notably maintained its efforts on marketing activity and
spending on the industry’s development amid difficult
economic circumstances.
The United Kingdom moves up by two more
positions since the last edition of the Report, to reach
5th place this year. The country’s T&T competitiveness
is based on its excellent cultural resources (ranked
3rd), with many World Heritage cultural sites, a large
number of international fairs, and strong creative
industries (all ranked within the top 10). The country
has probably benefitted from two important events in
2012: the Olympic Games and the Diamond Jubilee of
Queen Elizabeth II. Although the outcome is not yet fully
reflected in the data, the United Kingdom has leveraged
the preparation of these events in terms of tourism
campaigns, generating interest in visiting the country
Table 2: The Travel & Tourism Competitiveness Index 2013: Europe
SUBINDEXES
T&T regulatory Business environment T&T human, cultural,
OVERALL INDEX framework and infrastructure and natural resources
Regional Overall
Country/Economy rank rank Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank Score
Switzerland 1 1 5.66 1 5.94 1 5.42 2 5.63
Germany 2 2 5.39 8 5.57 6 5.29 7 5.31
Austria 3 3 5.39 2 5.80 11 5.11 9 5.24
Spain 4 4 5.38 14 5.48 5 5.30 6 5.36
United Kingdom 5 5 5.38 17 5.44 10 5.13 3 5.57
France 6 7 5.31 9 5.56 7 5.18 11 5.20
Sweden 7 9 5.24 12 5.54 23 4.89 8 5.30
Netherlands 8 13 5.14 16 5.45 15 5.01 16 4.97
Iceland 9 16 5.10 3 5.77 13 5.06 36 4.47
Finland 10 17 5.10 5 5.74 22 4.89 24 4.65
Belgium 11 18 5.04 18 5.43 26 4.78 18 4.90
Ireland 12 19 5.01 7 5.68 19 4.96 40 4.41
Portugal 13 20 5.01 20 5.42 27 4.78 19 4.84
Denmark 14 21 4.98 25 5.31 16 4.98 26 4.64
Norway 15 22 4.95 11 5.55 28 4.77 33 4.53
Luxembourg 16 23 4.93 21 5.41 20 4.96 39 4.42
Malta 17 24 4.92 15 5.47 14 5.06 49 4.22
Italy 18 26 4.90 50 4.90 29 4.76 14 5.05
Cyprus 19 29 4.84 22 5.35 21 4.89 46 4.27
Estonia 20 30 4.82 10 5.55 30 4.72 51 4.19
Czech Republic 21 31 4.78 28 5.24 37 4.49 28 4.61
Greece 22 32 4.75 39 5.02 33 4.65 30 4.58
Croatia 23 35 4.59 42 4.99 39 4.43 42 4.37
Slovenia 24 36 4.58 33 5.12 35 4.52 52 4.11
Hungary 25 39 4.51 26 5.29 49 4.16 54 4.08
Montenegro 26 40 4.50 34 5.09 50 4.14 47 4.26
Poland 27 42 4.47 49 4.92 58 3.94 32 4.56
Turkey 28 46 4.44 64 4.62 52 4.08 27 4.63
Latvia 29 48 4.43 35 5.08 40 4.40 77 3.81
Lithuania 30 49 4.39 41 4.99 48 4.19 61 3.98
Bulgaria 31 50 4.38 58 4.79 45 4.24 53 4.10
Slovak Republic 32 54 4.32 43 4.96 60 3.92 55 4.06
Russian Federation 33 63 4.16 92 4.24 46 4.22 58 4.02
Georgia 34 66 4.10 30 5.18 80 3.46 91 3.67
Romania 35 68 4.04 66 4.61 68 3.67 73 3.85
Macedonia, FYR 36 75 3.98 57 4.79 74 3.58 100 3.58
Ukraine 37 76 3.98 60 4.73 71 3.62 99 3.59
Albania 38 77 3.97 63 4.65 90 3.31 63 3.96
Armenia 39 79 3.96 51 4.88 88 3.34 94 3.65
Serbia 40 89 3.78 74 4.50 81 3.40 109 3.45
Bosnia and Herzegovina 41 90 3.78 75 4.47 95 3.19 92 3.66
Moldova 42 102 3.60 65 4.61 97 3.16 133 3.04
© 2013 World Economic Forum
21. Executive Summary
The Travel & Tourism Competitiveness Report 2013 | xix
and reinforcing their already-solid ICT and air transport
infrastructure (ranked 10th and 5th, respectively). The
generally supportive policy environment, ranked 8th,
encourages the development of the sector, while the
country relies on an excellent human resources base
(ranked 6th). On a less positive note, the United Kingdom
continues to receive one of the poorest assessments
for price competitiveness (138th), in large part because
it has the 2nd highest tax rate on tickets and airport
charges worldwide.
France is ranked 7th overall in this edition, losing
four positions since 2011. France continues to attract
many tourists with its rich cultural heritage (ranked 4th
for the number of World Heritage cultural sites and 8th
for creative industries). The country also hosts many
international fairs and exhibitions (ranked 5th). France’s
ground transport infrastructure is still one of the best
in the world (ranked 5th), with particularly good roads
and railroads as well as good air transport infrastructure
(ranked 8th). However, the overall policy rules and
regulation framework is not sufficiently supportive
of developing the sector, and the prioritization of the
T&T sector declines this year (ranked 35th overall).
Additionally, the assessment has weakened somewhat
in terms of the quality and availability of qualified labor in
the country.
Italy moves up one spot this year to place 26th
overall and 18th in Europe. As well as its cultural
richness—with many World Heritage Sites, international
fairs and exhibitions, and rich creative industries—
Italy’s strengths lie in its excellent tourism infrastructure
(tying with Austria for 1st place) and its relatively good
air transport infrastructure (24th). However, it faces a
number of challenges that bring its overall rating down.
These include policy rules and regulations that are
still not sufficiently supportive of the development of
the sector (100th) and a lack of price competitiveness
(134th).
Greece is ranked 32nd, down another three
positions since the last assessment. The country’s
rich cultural resources (ranked 25th) and excellent
tourism infrastructure (3rd) are still important strengths.
Additionally, Greece has very good health and hygiene
conditions (ranked 13th overall) and good air transport
infrastructure (20th). Further, there is a strong national
affinity for tourism compared with many other European
countries, including a generally open and positive
attitude toward tourists. The decline in the rankings
can be traced to a further worsening of the policy
environment and a lower perceived prioritization of
Travel & Tourism within the country, probably because of
dwindling resources available for the particular industry
amid general economic and financial difficulties.
Turkey climbs four positions this year to reach 46th
place. The country’s main strength continues to lie in
its rich cultural resources (19th), with 20 World Heritage
cultural sites, several international fairs and exhibitions,
and strong creative industries. In addition, Turkey
gains significantly in a number of areas and has seen a
significant increase in tourist arrivals over the last two
years. The policy rules and regulations governing the
sector are supportive and have continued to progress
since the 2011 T&T Report. Turkey has also improved
its air transport infrastructure (29th) and its tourism
infrastructure (45th). However, some areas still hold back
the overall T&T competitiveness performance of the
country: although improving, safety and security issues
(79th) remain worrisome, ground transport infrastructure
is inadequate (especially railroads and ports), and ICT
infrastructure remains unsatisfactory (71st), especially for
a rapidly growing tourism destination. In addition, more
efforts must be made toward environmental sustainability
(ranked 95th), an area that will be of increasing concern
going forward.
The Americas
Table 3 shows the regional rankings for the countries in
the Americas. As this table shows, the United States
is the highest-ranked country in the Americas and 6th
out of all countries, with stable performance since the
last assessment. Overall, the country receives high
marks for its business environment and infrastructure.
In particular, the United States has excellent air
transport infrastructure (ranked 2nd) and high-quality
tourism infrastructure, as well as a strong focus on
customer satisfaction. Its cultural resources and natural
resources (ranked 5th and 3rd, respectively), with many
World Heritage cultural and natural sites, drive its high
position in the rankings, together with several fairs and
exhibitions (1st) and strong creative industries (2nd). On
a less positive note, the country’s natural endowments
are not being sufficiently protected (ranked 112th for
environmental sustainability). Also, compared with other
top-ranked economies, the quality of ground transport
could be improved more (27th) and the perception of
safety and security leaves room for improvement (57th).
Canada moves up one place to 8th overall. The
country has several strengths, including its rich natural
resources (10th) with numerous World Heritage sites
(ranked 5th), excellent air transport infrastructure, highly
qualified human resources (5th), and a strong policy
environment (10th). Its cultural resources are also a
strong point, with many international fairs and exhibitions
in the country. Canada has lost some ground in terms of
price competitiveness and environmental sustainability,
where, although it still ranks fairly high (41st), it registers
a decline in the perception of the enforcement of
environmental regulations and continues to suffer from
high CO2 per capita emissions.
Barbados ranks 3rd in the region and 27th overall,
up one place since the last assessment. Barbados
comes in 2nd overall for the country’s affinity for Travel
© 2013 World Economic Forum
22. Executive Summary
xx | The Travel & Tourism Competitiveness Report 2013
& Tourism, with a positive attitude toward tourists and
toward the value of tourism in the country, although it
does receive a middling score for the degree of customer
orientation (64th). The importance of the T&T sector for
Barbados is reflected in the high prioritization placed on
Travel & Tourism (8th), with significant emphasis put on
the sector’s development by the government and high
spending on the sector, ensuring effective destination-
marketing campaigns and collecting relevant sector data
on a timely basis. However, although there have been
some marginal improvements in some elements of its
environmental sustainability, additional efforts to protect
the natural environment would reinforce the country’s
strong T&T competitiveness.
Panama witnesses one of the most marked
improvements in this year’s TTCI, moving up to 37th
position overall and 4th in the region. The country’s
most important competitive advantage is its rich
endowment of natural resources, with its diverse fauna,
significant protected land areas, and a number of
World Heritage sites. The improvement in this year’s
rankings can be traced mainly to an improvement in the
country’s infrastructure. Tourism infrastructure has been
developed (now ranked 42nd), most notably with more
available hotel rooms. The quality of ground transport
has also improved across almost all modes, with port
infrastructure now ranked 4th and railroads ranked
32nd. Air transport improves as well and is now ranked
16th. The expansion of stadium capacity and creative
industries exports is also notable. On the other hand,
areas requiring further improvement include safety and
security (70th), the human resources base (79th), and
health and hygiene standards (86th).
Mexico is stable this year at 44th position (and
5th in the region). Mexico receives impressive marks
for its natural resources (ranked 8th), an area that
shows an improvement since the last assessment,
with many World Heritage natural sites and rich fauna.
The country’s cultural resources are also among the
best in the world (21st), with 34 World Heritage cultural
sites, several international fairs and exhibitions, and
strong creative industries. These inherent strengths are
reinforced by the overall prioritization of the sector in
the country (34th) and effective marketing and branding
campaigns. Some areas have improved, yet continue
to require attention—for example, ground transport
infrastructure is being developed but still ranks relatively
low (69th), and more efforts are required to ensure that
the sector is being developed in a sustainable way
(105th). Finally, despite a marginal improvement since
Table 3: The Travel & Tourism Competitiveness Index 2013: The Americas
SUBINDEXES
T&T regulatory Business environment T&T human, cultural,
OVERALL INDEX framework and infrastructure and natural resources
Regional Overall
Country/Economy rank rank Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank Score
United States 1 6 5.32 44 4.95 2 5.36 1 5.65
Canada 2 8 5.28 27 5.27 8 5.17 5 5.39
Barbados 3 27 4.88 13 5.50 18 4.96 50 4.20
Panama 4 37 4.54 54 4.83 36 4.52 45 4.29
Mexico 5 44 4.46 83 4.43 61 3.92 15 5.02
Costa Rica 6 47 4.44 52 4.88 56 3.98 38 4.45
Brazil 7 51 4.37 82 4.43 76 3.57 12 5.10
Puerto Rico 8 52 4.36 40 4.99 43 4.33 81 3.75
Chile 9 56 4.29 53 4.87 53 4.07 65 3.94
Uruguay 10 59 4.23 31 5.18 78 3.53 62 3.97
Argentina 11 61 4.17 69 4.54 72 3.61 41 4.38
Jamaica 12 67 4.08 59 4.76 64 3.76 87 3.72
Peru 13 73 4.00 96 4.17 85 3.36 37 4.47
Ecuador 14 81 3.93 85 4.37 83 3.38 56 4.05
Trinidad and Tobago 15 83 3.93 104 4.07 54 4.07 95 3.64
Colombia 16 84 3.90 101 4.11 103 3.09 34 4.51
Dominican Republic 17 86 3.88 67 4.60 75 3.58 108 3.45
Honduras 18 93 3.72 97 4.17 92 3.28 89 3.69
Nicaragua 19 95 3.67 98 4.15 101 3.11 82 3.74
Guatemala 20 97 3.65 109 3.93 98 3.15 69 3.88
Suriname 21 100 3.63 106 4.05 100 3.11 86 3.72
Guyana 22 103 3.60 80 4.44 111 2.88 106 3.47
El Salvador 23 104 3.59 99 4.14 82 3.39 125 3.24
Bolivia 24 110 3.46 125 3.55 102 3.09 85 3.73
Venezuela 25 113 3.41 119 3.67 99 3.12 110 3.45
Paraguay 26 115 3.39 103 4.09 115 2.80 120 3.29
Haiti 27 140 2.59 138 2.93 136 2.39 140 2.44
© 2013 World Economic Forum
23. Executive Summary
The Travel & Tourism Competitiveness Report 2013 | xxi
last year, safety and security remains the main source
of concern for the T&T sector, where Mexico still ranks a
low 121st.
Brazil is ranked 7th in the Americas and 51st
overall, up one position since 2011. The country is
ranked 1st out of all countries for its natural resources
and 23rd for its cultural resources, with many World
Heritage sites, a good proportion of protected land area,
and the richest fauna in the world. This is buttressed by
a focus on environmental sustainability (ranked 30th), an
area that has been improving over recent years, although
the protection of the country’s diverse fauna requires
additional efforts. The safety and security environment
and health and hygiene conditions have also improved
slightly since the last assessment. On the other hand,
the ground transport network remains underdeveloped
(129th), with the quality of roads, ports, and railroads
requiring improvement to keep pace with the economic
development of the country. Preparations for two major
sports events in the next five years (the FIFA World
Cup in 2014 and the Olympic Games in 2016) provide
opportunities to bridge the infrastructure gap. Brazil also
continues to suffer from a lack of price competitiveness
(126th), with high and increasing ticket taxes and
airport charges, as well as high and rising prices more
generally. Further, the overall policy environment is not
particularly conducive to the development of the sector
(ranked 119th), with discouraging rules on FDI, much
time required for starting a business, and somewhat
restrictive commitments to opening up tourism services
under GATS commitments.
Chile ranks 9th in the region and 56th overall,
maintaining a stable performance since the last
assessment. It has notable cultural resources, with six
World Heritage cultural sites and several international
fairs and exhibitions. In addition, policy rules and
regulations are conducive to the development of the T&T
sector (12th), with few foreign ownership restrictions,
a liberal visa regime, and open bilateral Air Service
Agreements, although the time and cost for starting
new businesses remain relatively high. The country
also benefits from good safety and security by regional
standards (31st). Additionally, tourism infrastructure
has improved noticeably and now rank 49th. However,
Chile’s T&T competitiveness would be strengthened by
upgrading its transport infrastructure and thus raising
the quality of tourism infrastructure further, as well as by
focusing more on preserving the environment to develop
the industry in a more environmentally sustainable way.
Peru is ranked 13th in the region, placing 73rd
overall. Peru’s natural and cultural resources remain
important assets for the tourism industry. The country
has one of the richest fauna in the world (3rd) and hosts
several natural and cultural World Heritage sites. Peru
has seen a continuous growth in tourist arrivals and
international flights, even during the global recession.
The effectiveness of marketing and branding to promote
the T&T sector shows improvement, and government
spending on the industry has increased slightly.
However, in order to raise its T&T competitiveness
further, safety and security must be improved (118th)
and ground transport infrastructure must be upgraded
(121st). Additionally, the country has lost some price
competitiveness because of higher general and tourism-
specific taxation, most notably the high ticket taxes
and airport charges (where the country ranks 135th). A
more in-depth analysis of the performance of the T&T
competitiveness of Peru will be conducted in a dedicated
publication to be issued in April 2013, on occasion of the
World Economic Forum on Latin America 2013.
Asia Pacific
Table 4 displays the regional rankings and data for the
Asia Pacific region. As the table shows, Singapore is
the top-ranked economy in the region at 10th position
overall, the same position it has held for the past three
editions. Singapore benefits from excellent transport
infrastructure, with ground transport infrastructure
and air transport infrastructure ranked 2nd and 14th,
respectively. Singapore ranks 2nd for the high quality
of its available human resources. And with its famously
well-functioning public institutions, it is perhaps not
surprising that Singapore ranks 1st out of all economies
for its policy environment, with rules and regulations
that are extremely conducive to the development of its
T&T industries (policies facilitating foreign ownership
and FDI, well-protected property rights, and few visa
restrictions). Further, Singapore is among the safest
economies of all assessed with regard to safety and
security, and receives strong assessments for other
types of infrastructure. One area of concern is its price
competitiveness, which has eroded as seen in increasing
hotel prices and taxation.
Singapore is followed in the regional rankings by
Australia, which improves by two places and is now
at 11th position overall. Australia’s T&T competitiveness
continues to be characterized by a number of clear
strengths, including its rich natural resources and the
highest number of World Heritage natural sites in the
world, benefiting from diverse fauna and a comparatively
pristine natural environment. Given the importance
of the environment for much of its leisure tourism,
it is notable that the stringency and enforcement of
its environmental regulations are well assessed. And
given the country’s distance from other continents
and the related importance of domestic air travel to
overcome the large distances between major sites,
its competitiveness is also buttressed by excellent air
transport infrastructure (ranked 4th) as well as good
general tourism infrastructure (ranked 20th). Australia
also sees some improvements in the policy rules and
regulations affecting the sector, especially its increased
© 2013 World Economic Forum
24. Executive Summary
xxii | The Travel & Tourism Competitiveness Report 2013
openness in bilateral Air Service Agreements. In terms
of visa requirements, Australia has one of the most
advanced visa policies in the world (especially with
respect to the electronic visa process) at a time when
a number of other countries are moving in the opposite
direction.
New Zealand ranks 3rd in the region and 12th
overall, an improvement of seven positions, one of the
most significant in the region. The country continues to
benefit from its rich natural resources, with a number
of World Heritage natural sites (ranked 18th) and a
pristine natural environment (ranked 3rd), protected
by strong and well-enforced environmental legislation.
The country’s policy rules and regulations are highly
conducive to the development of the sector (ranked
2nd), with very transparent policymaking and among
the least time and lowest cost required to start a
business in the world. The country also benefits from
high-quality human resources (ranked 13th) and a very
safe and secure environment overall (9th). Although
New Zealand’s ground transport network remains
somewhat underdeveloped given its advanced stage
of development, its air transport infrastructure gets
excellent marks (ranked 12th) and its ICT infrastructure is
quite good by international standards. The most relevant
improvement in New Zealand’s performance in this
edition is registered in its tourism infrastructure, driven
especially by a rise in the number of available hotel
rooms.
Japan is ranked 4th regionally and 14th out of all
the economies in the TTCI, up eight places since the last
assessment. This achievement is especially impressive
against the backdrop of the 2011 tsunami and related
nuclear disaster. Japan’s T&T sector resilience can be
ascribed to its rich cultural resources (ranked 11th),
with its 32 World Heritage cultural sites, the many
international fairs and exhibitions hosted by the country,
and its rich creative industries. Its ground transport
infrastructure is among the best in the world (ranked
7th), especially its railroads, and Japan continues to
lead in the area of education and training (ranked 13th).
Moreover, it has continued to develop its already strong
ICT infrastructure and now ranks 7th in this area. In
addition, Japan’s extremely customer oriented culture
(1st) is an important strength for the T&T industry. On the
other hand, the country continues to be an expensive
destination, ranking 130th in the price competitiveness
pillar.
Hong Kong SAR is ranked 15th. Its transport
infrastructure is among the most developed in the
world, with the best ground transport infrastructure
and air transport infrastructure that ranks 6th. Further,
the economy’s ICT infrastructure ranks 2nd worldwide,
demonstrating an important support for an industry that
Table 4: The Travel & Tourism Competitiveness Index 2013: Asia Pacific
SUBINDEXES
T&T regulatory Business environment T&T human, cultural,
OVERALL INDEX framework and infrastructure and natural resources
Regional Overall
Country/Economy rank rank Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank Score
Singapore 1 10 5.23 6 5.74 4 5.31 25 4.64
Australia 2 11 5.17 23 5.32 25 4.81 4 5.39
New Zealand 3 12 5.17 4 5.75 12 5.06 22 4.69
Japan 4 14 5.13 24 5.31 24 4.86 10 5.22
Hong Kong SAR 5 15 5.11 19 5.43 3 5.32 29 4.59
Korea, Rep. 6 25 4.91 38 5.02 17 4.98 20 4.74
Taiwan, China 7 33 4.71 29 5.19 34 4.63 44 4.29
Malaysia 8 34 4.70 55 4.82 41 4.36 17 4.93
Thailand 9 43 4.47 76 4.47 44 4.25 23 4.68
China 10 45 4.45 71 4.50 63 3.77 13 5.09
India 11 65 4.11 110 3.92 67 3.69 21 4.72
Indonesia 12 70 4.03 95 4.18 84 3.36 31 4.56
Brunei Darussalam 13 72 4.01 94 4.18 57 3.94 67 3.91
Sri Lanka 14 74 3.99 61 4.68 86 3.35 66 3.93
Azerbaijan 15 78 3.97 46 4.94 87 3.34 96 3.63
Vietnam 16 80 3.95 88 4.30 94 3.26 43 4.30
Philippines 17 82 3.93 70 4.51 89 3.33 64 3.95
Kazakhstan 18 88 3.82 62 4.66 79 3.48 119 3.30
Mongolia 19 99 3.63 91 4.25 107 2.96 90 3.69
Cambodia 20 106 3.56 105 4.06 112 2.86 78 3.77
Kyrgyz Republic 21 111 3.45 93 4.23 131 2.61 103 3.51
Nepal 22 112 3.42 100 4.14 128 2.64 105 3.48
Tajikistan 23 114 3.41 90 4.28 123 2.69 122 3.26
Pakistan 24 122 3.25 131 3.38 104 2.99 116 3.38
Bangladesh 25 123 3.24 124 3.56 109 2.91 124 3.24
© 2013 World Economic Forum
25. Executive Summary
The Travel & Tourism Competitiveness Report 2013 | xxiii
depends so much on ICTs. Additionally, Hong Kong
benefits from strong safety and security (3rd) as well
as a conducive business environment, coming in 3rd
in the policy rules and regulations pillar. It also receives
relatively good marks for cultural resources, with many
international fairs and exhibitions and strong creative
industries. However, Hong Kong trails other advanced
economies in the region for its lack of emphasis on
environmental sustainability, where it ranks a low 118th.
Korea, Rep. is ranked 25th, just ahead of Taiwan
and Malaysia in the regional rankings and improving by
seven places. Korea’s strengths lie in its excellent ground
transport and ICT infrastructure (ranked 16th and 1st,
respectively) and its rich cultural resources (ranked 10th).
Its rise in the overall rankings is driven by improvements
in almost all the pillars, with a measurable increase in
the prioritization and affinity for Travel & Tourism, thanks
to increased marketing and branding efforts, and a
high degree of customer orientation (9th). On a less
positive note, Korea remains a relative costly destination
(ranked 96th for price competitiveness) and, despite
much discussion in public discourse, the tourism sector
is not being developed in a sufficiently sustainable way
(69th), although there are improvements since the last
assessment.
Malaysia is ranked 8th regionally and 34th overall,
up one position since the 2011 ‑Report. Malaysia
benefits from its rich natural resources (ranked 18th) and
its cultural resources (ranked 31st). The country also
benefits from excellent price competitiveness (ranked
5th), with comparatively low fuel prices, low ticket taxes
and airport charges, competitive hotel prices, and a
favorable tax regime. Malaysia’s policy environment is
assessed as very conducive to the development of the
sector (ranked 9th), an area that has improved since the
last assessment, and the country is characterized by a
strong affinity for Travel & Tourism more generally (ranked
16th). However, health and hygiene indicators trail those
of many other countries in the region, with, in particular,
a low physician density and few hospital beds available.
Further, environmental sustainability remains an area
for improvement, with high emission levels and several
threatened species, although business leaders feel that
efforts are being made in this area.
Thailand is ranked 9th in the region and 43rd
overall. The country declines by only two places since
the last edition, demonstrating some resilience to the
natural disasters and political unrest with which the
country has been grappling. Thailand is endowed with
rich natural resources and a strong affinity for Travel &
Tourism (ranked and 23rd and 18th, respectively), with
a very friendly attitude of the population toward tourists
(ranked 13th). This is buttressed by the government’s
strong prioritization of the sector, with good destination-
marketing campaigns (11th) and relative price
competitiveness (25th). However, some weaknesses
remain: despite the prioritization of the sector by
the government, some aspects of the regulatory
environment—such as the protection of property rights
and the long time required for starting a business—are
not particularly conducive to developing the sector
(ranked 77th). In addition, given the importance of
the natural environment for the country’s tourism,
environmental sustainability should be a greater priority
(ranked 99th on this indicator).
China is ranked 10th regionally, losing six places
and falling to 45th overall this year. China continues to
build on some clear strengths: it comes in 5th for its
natural resources, with many World Heritage natural
sites and fauna that are among the richest in the
world. It places 15th for its cultural resources, with
several World Heritage cultural sites, many international
fairs and exhibitions, and creative industries that are
unsurpassed. Moreover, the country continues to
develop its infrastructure, with improvements in air
transport (35th) and ground transport (51st). However,
some weaknesses pull the country’s ranking down.
China’s policy environment is not highly conducive to the
T&T sector’s development (ranked 86th). Furthermore,
there are increasing concerns related to the sustainable
development of the sector (109th). China’s tourism
infrastructure remains underdeveloped (ranked 101th),
with few international-quality standard hotel rooms
available and few ATMs, and the country receives a poor
assessment for its general affinity for Travel & Tourism,
where it ranks 129th. Finally, although the country
continues to benefit from relative price competitiveness
(ranked 37th), this advantage has started to weaken
under the weight of increasing inflation in several areas,
as demonstrated by higher hotel prices and weakening
purchasing power.
India is ranked 11th in the region and 65th overall,
gaining three places since the last edition. As with China,
India is well assessed for its natural resources (ranked
9th) and cultural resources (24th), with many natural and
cultural World Heritage sites, rich fauna, many fairs and
exhibitions, and strong creative industries. India also has
quite good air transport (ranked 39th), particularly given
the country’s stage of development, and reasonable
ground transport infrastructure (ranked 42nd), although
the quality of roads (85th) and of ports (79th) require
further improvement. In addition, India remains a
relatively price competitive destination (20th), even in
the regional context. However, some aspects of its
tourism infrastructure remain somewhat underdeveloped
(ranked 95th), with very few hotel rooms per capita by
international comparison and low ATM penetration. ICT
infrastructure also remains somewhat underdeveloped
and underexploited (111th). Another area of concern is
the policy environment, which is ranked 125th because
of the long time and high cost required to start a
business, a restrictive visa policy (132nd), and low level
© 2013 World Economic Forum
26. Executive Summary
xxiv | The Travel & Tourism Competitiveness Report 2013
of commitment in GATS agreements for tourism services
(114th). Other areas requiring attention are health and
hygiene standards (109th) and the country’s human
resources base (96th).
Indonesia is ranked 12th in the region, right behind
India the regional rankings and 70th overall, up four
places since the last edition. In terms of strengths,
Indonesia places 6th for its excellent natural resources,
with several World Heritage natural sites and the
richness of its fauna as measured by the known species
in the country. Indonesia also has rich cultural resources
(ranked 38th), with 10 World Heritage cultural sites, a
number of international fairs and exhibitions held in the
country, and strong creative industries. Further, the
country is ranked 9th overall on price competitiveness in
the T&T industry because of its competitive hotel prices
(ranked 21st), low ticket taxes and airport charges, and
favorable fuel prices. In addition, it is ranked 19th for
its national prioritization of Travel & Tourism. However,
these strengths are held back by underdeveloped
infrastructure in the country, especially ground
transport (87th), tourism infrastructure (113th), and ICT
infrastructure (87th); together these represent significant
investment opportunities in the country. There are also
some concerns related to safety and security, particularly
the business costs of crime and potential terrorism. In
addition, Indonesia is not ensuring the environmentally
sustainable development of the tourism sector (ranked
125th), an area of particular concern given the sector’s
dependence on the quality of the natural environment.
The Philippines is the most improved country in
the region, ranking 16th regionally and 82nd overall, up
12 places since the last edition. Among the country’s
comparative strengths are its natural resources (44th),
its price competitiveness (24th), and a very strong—and
improving—prioritization of the Travel & Tourism industry
(this indicator ranks 15th, as government spending on
the sector as a percentage of GDP is now 1st in the
world, and tourism marketing and branding campaigns
are seen to be increasingly effective). In addition, the
country has been ensuring that several aspects of its
policy rules and regulations regime are conducive to the
development of the T&T sector. Among these are better
protection of property rights, more openness toward
foreign investments, and few visa requirements for
foreign visitors (ranked 7th). However, other areas—such
as the difficulty of starting a business in the country, in
both cost and length of the process (ranked 94th and
117th, respectively)—remain a challenge. Moreover,
safety and security concerns (ranked 103rd); inadequate
health and hygiene (94th); and underdeveloped
ground transport, tourism, and ICT infrastructure are
all holding back the potential of the economy’s T&T
competitiveness.
The Middle East and North Africa
Table 5 shows the regional rankings for the Middle East
and North Africa region. As the table shows, the United
Arab Emirates (UAE) continues to lead the region at
28th overall, up two places since the last assessment.
Although the UAE is not endowed with rich natural
resources, it has built a cultural resource base, attracting
both leisure and business travelers, with several
and growing international fairs and exhibitions and
increasingly diverse creative industries. In addition, the
country is characterized by a strong affinity for Travel &
Tourism (24th). Perhaps the most important competitive
advantage of UAE T&T competitiveness relates to its
world-class international hubs for global air travel.
Further, the country has carried out effective marketing
and branding campaigns (1st) and has embraced
policy rules and regulations that are conducive to the
development of the sector (13th). In particular, the
country is open to foreign investments (14th) and has a
liberal visa regime (33rd). Environmental sustainability,
although improving somewhat compared with past
years, continues to be an area of some concern
(ranked 91st). Hotel prices are also somewhat high by
international standards (101st).
Qatar is ranked 2nd in the region and 41st overall,
up one place since the last assessment. Qatar benefits
from a safe and secure environment (ranked 21st),
good ICT and tourism infrastructures (32nd and 37th,
respectively), and excellent air transport infrastructure
(23rd), in line with its role as an air transportation
hub. The ease of hiring foreign labor (4th), increasing
enrollment rates, and the quality of its education drive
the ability of the country to find high-quality human
resources (ranked 7th) inside and outside the country.
Qatar also has a high degree of customer orientation
(5th). In order to further enhance the country’s T&T
competitiveness, Qatar should continue to improve its
focus on environmental sustainability (59th) and ensure
that it does not lose sight of the importance of the sector
for its development—at a rank of 80 in this edition, the
prioritization of the sector is somewhat lower than in past
years.
Israel is ranked 3rd in the region, dropping seven
places to 53rd overall. Israel benefits from its cultural
attributes, including a number of World Heritage
cultural sites. The country’s human resources base is
also well evaluated (31st), providing healthy and well-
trained people to work in the T&T sector. Further, its
ICT infrastructure is quite well developed (27th), while its
health and hygiene gets a good mark (26th), especially
in a regional context. On a less positive note, some
aspects of safety and security continue to erode at
the country’s T&T competitiveness: these are primarily
related to concerns about terrorism (Israel ranks 124th
on this indicator, somewhat lower than in the last
edition). However, the decline in rank since the last
© 2013 World Economic Forum
27. Executive Summary
The Travel & Tourism Competitiveness Report 2013 | xxv
assessment can also be attributed to diminished price
competitiveness (ranked 133rd), the result of increasing
fuel prices, hotel prices, ticket taxes, and airport charges
and the perception that general taxation has become
more distortionary.
Bahrain is ranked 4th in the region and 55th
overall, down 15 positions since the last assessment.
The country maintains a number of clear strengths:
good transport infrastructure, particularly ground
transport infrastructure (ranked 11th); high-quality
human resources in the country (26th); and strong price
competitiveness (7th). However, Bahrain is seeing a
weakening in the assessment of its tourism infrastructure
(66th), while health and hygiene standards (89th) and
ICT infrastructure (47th) struggle to keep up with rapid
population growth. Also its limited natural resources
(129th) and environmental sustainability (103rd) do not
help the country to attract tourists.
Sub-Saharan Africa
Table 6 shows the results for the sub-Saharan region
which sees the Seychelles entering the rankings
for the first time at the top of the region, and 38th
overall. The importance of Travel & Tourism for the
country’s economy is reflected in its top ranking for the
prioritization of the industry, with the 2nd highest T&T
expenditure–to-GDP ratio in the world and effective
marketing and branding campaigns. These efforts
are reinforced by a strong national affinity for Travel &
Tourism (5th); good tourism infrastructure, especially
in terms of available hotel rooms (6th); and good
ground and air transport infrastructures, particularly by
regional standards (31st and 27th, respectively). These
positive attributes somewhat make up for its relative
lack of price competitiveness (120th). Although the
natural environment is now assessed as being in good
condition, efforts to develop the industry in a sustainable
way could be reinforced, for example by increasing
marine and terrestrial protection, which would help to
protect the many threatened species in the country
(132nd).
Mauritius loses its number one spot in the regional
rankings, overtaken by the entry of the Seychelles this
year, and is ranked 58th overall. The prioritization of
the industry remains high (3rd), together with a strong
national affinity for Travel & Tourism (6th). The country’s
tourism and ground infrastructure are well developed
by regional standards (48th and 37th, respectively), and
its policy environment is supportive of the development
of the sector (ranked 28th). Mauritius also benefits from
high marks for safety and security (36th). However,
the country has seen its price competitiveness decline
significantly (ranked 75th, down from 18th in the last
assessment)—primarily the result of increasing hotel and
fuel prices and high ticket taxes and airport charges.
Additionally, in terms of challenges, the country’s
environmental sustainability has received a weakened
assessment, of particular concern given the importance
of the natural environment for the country’s leisure
tourism.
South Africa is ranked 3rd in the region and
64th overall, gaining two places since the last edition.
South Africa comes in high at 17th place for its natural
resources and 58th for its cultural resources, based
on its many World Heritage sites, its rich fauna, its
creative industries, and the many international fairs and
exhibitions held in the country. Infrastructure in South
Africa is also well developed for the region, with air
transport infrastructure ranked 43rd and a particularly
good assessment of railroad quality (46th) and road
Table 5: The Travel & Tourism Competitiveness Index 2013: The Middle East and North Africa
SUBINDEXES
T&T regulatory Business environment T&T human, cultural,
OVERALL INDEX framework and infrastructure and natural resources
Regional Overall
Country/Economy rank rank Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank Score
United Arab Emirates 1 28 4.86 45 4.95 9 5.14 35 4.51
Qatar 2 41 4.49 48 4.93 31 4.70 75 3.85
Israel 3 53 4.34 36 5.07 51 4.08 71 3.86
Bahrain 4 55 4.30 77 4.46 32 4.69 83 3.74
Oman 5 57 4.29 56 4.81 47 4.20 76 3.84
Jordan 6 60 4.18 37 5.05 69 3.63 72 3.86
Saudi Arabia 7 62 4.17 87 4.32 38 4.43 80 3.76
Lebanon 8 69 4.04 73 4.50 65 3.74 70 3.87
Morocco 9 71 4.03 68 4.59 73 3.60 68 3.89
Egypt 10 85 3.88 86 4.35 77 3.56 84 3.74
Iran, Islamic Rep. 11 98 3.64 112 3.90 96 3.18 74 3.85
Kuwait 12 101 3.61 114 3.81 62 3.89 131 3.14
Algeria 13 132 3.07 134 3.30 126 2.66 123 3.25
Yemen 14 133 2.96 140 2.82 110 2.89 128 3.18
Mauritania 15 134 2.91 137 3.07 133 2.60 132 3.07
© 2013 World Economic Forum
28. Executive Summary
xxvi | The Travel & Tourism Competitiveness Report 2013
quality (42nd). Overall, policy rules and regulations are
conducive to the sector’s development (ranked 29th); this
is an area where the country has improved steadily over
the past few assessments, with well-protected property
rights and few visa requirements for visitors. Indeed,
tourism continues to be one of the five priority sectors
in the country’s growth plan, and the government has
reviewed tourism legislation in an effort to streamline it
further. However, there are also some areas of weakness
that have brought down the country’s overall ranking.
Safety and security remains quite worrisome (ranked
117th), as does the level of health and hygiene (87th)—
the result of low physician density and concerns about
access to improved sanitation. Related to this, human
resources are also negatively affected by the poor health
of much of the workforce, with a low life expectancy
(129th, at 52 years) driven by high rates of communicable
diseases such as HIV (137th). Improving the health of the
workforce is of urgent concern for the future of the T&T
sector, as well as for all other sectors in the economy.
Additionally, this year South Africa has experienced
an increase in fuel prices (77th) and ticket taxes and
airport charges (105th), which have diminished its price
competitiveness.
Namibia reaches 5th place the regional rankings,
coming in at 91st overall. The country benefits from its
rich natural resources, with rich fauna and a pristine
natural environment. Indeed, environmental sustainability
is prioritized to some extent in the country (ranked 36th),
which is critical given the importance of the quality
of the environment for Namibia’s tourism. In addition,
ground transport infrastructure is somewhat developed
by regional standards (60th). In order to further develop
the sector, a more conducive policy environment will be
important. For example, despite efforts in recent years, it
remains costly and time consuming to start a business.
Health and hygiene is also not up to international
standards (106th): the country has few doctors and
insufficient access to improved sanitation and drinking
water. More generally, improving the country’s human
resources base (130th) through better education and
training and more conducive labor laws will be critical.
Botswana is ranked 7th in the region and 94th
overall, down three places since the last edition of
Table 6: The Travel & Tourism Competitiveness Index 2013: Sub-Saharan Africa
SUBINDEXES
T&T regulatory Business environment T&T human, cultural,
OVERALL INDEX framework and infrastructure and natural resources
Regional Overall
Country/Economy rank rank Score Rank Score Rank Score Rank Score
Seychelles 1 38 4.51 47 4.94 42 4.35 48 4.26
Mauritius 2 58 4.28 32 5.16 55 4.04 93 3.65
South Africa 3 64 4.13 81 4.44 59 3.93 57 4.03
Cape Verde 4 87 3.87 79 4.45 66 3.72 107 3.45
Namibia 5 91 3.77 89 4.30 70 3.62 115 3.38
Gambia, The 6 92 3.73 72 4.50 93 3.27 111 3.43
Botswana 7 94 3.71 84 4.38 91 3.31 112 3.43
Kenya 8 96 3.66 108 3.98 105 2.98 60 4.01
Rwanda 9 105 3.56 78 4.46 117 2.74 104 3.49
Senegal 10 107 3.49 111 3.91 113 2.84 88 3.71
Zambia 11 108 3.46 102 4.11 122 2.69 98 3.60
Tanzania 12 109 3.46 118 3.67 125 2.68 59 4.02
Uganda 13 116 3.39 116 3.71 121 2.70 79 3.76
Ghana 14 117 3.38 113 3.86 108 2.94 117 3.35
Zimbabwe 15 118 3.33 117 3.67 116 2.76 101 3.56
Swaziland 16 119 3.31 107 4.02 106 2.96 135 2.94
Ethiopia 17 120 3.29 122 3.60 127 2.65 97 3.61
Cameroon 18 121 3.27 123 3.58 124 2.68 102 3.56
Malawi 19 124 3.22 115 3.77 135 2.48 113 3.43
Mozambique 20 125 3.17 121 3.64 120 2.72 130 3.15
Côte d’Ivoire 21 126 3.15 133 3.31 118 2.73 114 3.41
Nigeria 22 127 3.14 135 3.26 114 2.83 118 3.33
Burkina Faso 23 128 3.12 120 3.64 134 2.55 129 3.16
Mali 24 129 3.11 128 3.45 129 2.61 121 3.28
Benin 25 130 3.09 127 3.46 130 2.61 126 3.20
Madagascar 26 131 3.09 132 3.33 119 2.73 127 3.20
Lesotho 27 135 2.89 126 3.46 132 2.60 139 2.62
Guinea 28 136 2.88 136 3.24 137 2.38 134 3.03
Sierra Leone 29 137 2.87 129 3.43 138 2.36 137 2.81
Burundi 30 138 2.82 130 3.40 139 2.33 138 2.73
Chad 31 139 2.61 139 2.90 140 2.11 136 2.82
© 2013 World Economic Forum