SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 17
A brief history of modern research ethics and the IRB
Zoltan Boka
Director of Research Compliance and Bioethics
Lehman College
 Testing ideas and hypotheses by performing
experiments involving people has a long
history but much of that time has been marred
by abuse
 For example, in 1718, King George I of England
offered a pardon to any prisoner in Newgate
Prison who agreed to be injected with the
smallpox virus as part of an experiment to find
a vaccine. (Huth, 2006)
 You’re a prisoner in England in 1718: The King offers
you a choice- get out now and be infected with the
smallpox virus, or be free of the virus but remain in
jail.
 Is that really a choice?
 The first task of IRB is to ensure that consent is freely
given. This is more complicated than it sounds.
 The Nuremberg Code was developed in the
aftermath of the discovery that Nazis
conducted human experimentation on
prisoners in concentration camps.
 The Code has three requirements for consent:
That one have a) the capacity to consent, b) a
freedom from coercion, and c) comprehension
of the risks and benefits involved
 King George has an idea: He would like to try out
the vaccine for smallpox on prisoners and gives
you two scenarios:
 1) A prisoner who consents to a trial gets a pardon
and one who does not consent stays in jail.
 2) Every prisoner gets an injection and will be told
that it is to help advance science but not told what
it is.
 What do you think?
 Between 1932 and 1972, the U.S. Health Service
told poor African-American men in Alabama
that they were receiving free medical care
when in actuality, they were not being treated
at all as physicians watched the disease
progress and individuals infect others.
 In 1974, Congress established 45 CFR Part 46,
which discusses the process by which
institutions obtain informed consent.
 First, you need to ask yourself whether what
you’re doing is human research:
 Are you conducting human research or clinical
investigations on human participants?
 Scenario: You are interested in how life expectancy
has grown between 1800 and 1900. You look up
death records to compile a list of how long people
in Bronx County lived before dying between 1800
and 1900. Is this human research?
 Once you know that you need IRB approval for
human research, you need certification.
 A certificate is generally good for up to three
years. Anyone who wants to work on human
subject research must have one.
 Once you are armed with a certificate, you
have to think about the design of your study.
 “The third experiment…took such an extraordinary
course that I called an SS physician of the camp as
witness, since I had worked on these experiments all
by myself. It was a continuous experiment without
oxygen at a height of 12 kilometers conducted on a
37year–old Jew in good general condition. Breathing
continued up to 30 minutes. After 4 minutes the
experimental subject began to perspire and wiggle his
head, after 5 minutes cramps occurred, between 6 and
10 minutes breathing increased in speed and the
experimental subject became unconscious; from 11 to
30 minutes breathing slowed down to three breaths per
minute, finally stopping altogether.” (Katz, 1992)
 These slides are just a primer. As you do
research, you will find yourself in many
situations where you have questions: The IRB
office can answer most of these issues.
 Once you’ve decided that a) you are going to
do research and b) involving human beings,
you must ask yourself: What, who and why?
 What procedures will you use?
 What equipment will you need?
 What space will you conduct your experiments
in? (If you are use more than one space,
sometimes you will need more than one
approval.)
 Who are you? What makes you qualified?
 Who will you be working with? (Even assistants
who are students will need to be certified.)
 Who is the population you’ll be studying? If you
are working with sick people, children, prisoners
or a specific vulnerable segment of the population,
you’ll face more scrutiny.
 Ask yourself who will be participating in your
study.
 For IRB this is the most important question and
it permeates everything:
 Why will you be performing this test instead of
something else?
 Why will you be looking at this population?
 Why do you need a certain number of
participants?
 Are you someone who “thought out
beforehand any accident or situation that might
occur, so that you know the right thing to do at
the right moment, and are willing to do it”?
 Spend twice as much time planning and
thinking as you do writing.
 Never assume that something can’t happen.
 I’m studying stress in athletes. I’m looking at how
their heart rate changes as they undergo more
difficult exercises.
 What should I do?
 I’m considering studying a disease and how it
effects the spine. The disease can show up in rats
and people and effect the spine the same way.
 What is your advice?
 It is always a good idea to get input from
another person; Even better if s/he from
outside your field or department.
 Huth, E. (2006). Quantitative evidence for
judgments on the efficacy of inoculation for the
prevention of smallpox: England and New
England in the 1700s. Journal of the Royal Society
of Medicine, 99(5), 262-266.
 Katz, J. (1992). Abuse of human beings for the
sake of science. In When medicine went mad (pp.
233-270). Humana Press.

More Related Content

What's hot

International Society for Vaccines (ISV) August Newsletter
International Society for Vaccines (ISV) August NewsletterInternational Society for Vaccines (ISV) August Newsletter
International Society for Vaccines (ISV) August NewsletterRandy Albrecht
 
Tuskegee study
Tuskegee studyTuskegee study
Tuskegee studyPradeep H
 
The temptation against humanity
The temptation against humanityThe temptation against humanity
The temptation against humanity翰泓 李
 
Tuskegee Experiment
Tuskegee ExperimentTuskegee Experiment
Tuskegee ExperimentDUKE
 
The Evolution of the Clinical Trials Process – A Brief History Lesson
The Evolution of the Clinical Trials Process – A Brief History LessonThe Evolution of the Clinical Trials Process – A Brief History Lesson
The Evolution of the Clinical Trials Process – A Brief History LessonPradeep H
 
Medical Ethics
 Medical Ethics Medical Ethics
Medical EthicsMona Mofti
 
Tuskegee experiement power point
Tuskegee experiement power pointTuskegee experiement power point
Tuskegee experiement power pointkaugustine66
 
Sleeping Beauty awakened by self-citation of a review
Sleeping Beauty awakened by self-citation of a reviewSleeping Beauty awakened by self-citation of a review
Sleeping Beauty awakened by self-citation of a reviewPhilippe GORRY
 
Introduction to Forensics by Piyush B. Thakur
Introduction to Forensics by Piyush B. Thakur Introduction to Forensics by Piyush B. Thakur
Introduction to Forensics by Piyush B. Thakur Piyush Thakur
 
Lecture 4 history and ethical codes
Lecture 4  history and ethical codesLecture 4  history and ethical codes
Lecture 4 history and ethical codesIshah Khaliq
 
Jeopardy interactive 5
Jeopardy interactive 5Jeopardy interactive 5
Jeopardy interactive 5King
 

What's hot (19)

International Society for Vaccines (ISV) August Newsletter
International Society for Vaccines (ISV) August NewsletterInternational Society for Vaccines (ISV) August Newsletter
International Society for Vaccines (ISV) August Newsletter
 
Tuskegee study
Tuskegee studyTuskegee study
Tuskegee study
 
Sulfonamides
SulfonamidesSulfonamides
Sulfonamides
 
The temptation against humanity
The temptation against humanityThe temptation against humanity
The temptation against humanity
 
Tuskegee Experiment
Tuskegee ExperimentTuskegee Experiment
Tuskegee Experiment
 
Ethical issues in research 2
Ethical issues in research 2Ethical issues in research 2
Ethical issues in research 2
 
The Evolution of the Clinical Trials Process – A Brief History Lesson
The Evolution of the Clinical Trials Process – A Brief History LessonThe Evolution of the Clinical Trials Process – A Brief History Lesson
The Evolution of the Clinical Trials Process – A Brief History Lesson
 
Back to Tuskegee
Back to TuskegeeBack to Tuskegee
Back to Tuskegee
 
Medical Ethics
 Medical Ethics Medical Ethics
Medical Ethics
 
Research Ethics
Research EthicsResearch Ethics
Research Ethics
 
IVMS-THE TUSKEGEE SYPHILIS EXPERIMENT 75 YEARS LATER
IVMS-THE  TUSKEGEE SYPHILIS EXPERIMENT  75 YEARS LATER IVMS-THE  TUSKEGEE SYPHILIS EXPERIMENT  75 YEARS LATER
IVMS-THE TUSKEGEE SYPHILIS EXPERIMENT 75 YEARS LATER
 
Tuskegee experiement power point
Tuskegee experiement power pointTuskegee experiement power point
Tuskegee experiement power point
 
Sleeping Beauty awakened by self-citation of a review
Sleeping Beauty awakened by self-citation of a reviewSleeping Beauty awakened by self-citation of a review
Sleeping Beauty awakened by self-citation of a review
 
Introduction to Forensics by Piyush B. Thakur
Introduction to Forensics by Piyush B. Thakur Introduction to Forensics by Piyush B. Thakur
Introduction to Forensics by Piyush B. Thakur
 
Lecture 4 history and ethical codes
Lecture 4  history and ethical codesLecture 4  history and ethical codes
Lecture 4 history and ethical codes
 
Jeopardy interactive 5
Jeopardy interactive 5Jeopardy interactive 5
Jeopardy interactive 5
 
Pr. Peivand Pirouzi - Protection of Human Subjects in Therapeutic Recreation ...
Pr. Peivand Pirouzi - Protection of Human Subjects in Therapeutic Recreation ...Pr. Peivand Pirouzi - Protection of Human Subjects in Therapeutic Recreation ...
Pr. Peivand Pirouzi - Protection of Human Subjects in Therapeutic Recreation ...
 
Human experiment
Human experimentHuman experiment
Human experiment
 
Tuskegee tests
Tuskegee testsTuskegee tests
Tuskegee tests
 

Viewers also liked (14)

Youtube statistics
Youtube statistics Youtube statistics
Youtube statistics
 
Topp tips for sikker kjøring
Topp tips for sikker kjøringTopp tips for sikker kjøring
Topp tips for sikker kjøring
 
Computational Toxicity: Stochastic PBPK modeling
Computational Toxicity: Stochastic PBPK modelingComputational Toxicity: Stochastic PBPK modeling
Computational Toxicity: Stochastic PBPK modeling
 
Ppt. ms iin
Ppt. ms iinPpt. ms iin
Ppt. ms iin
 
IMRAN 0
IMRAN 0IMRAN 0
IMRAN 0
 
Presentation Investigation
Presentation InvestigationPresentation Investigation
Presentation Investigation
 
Timeline
TimelineTimeline
Timeline
 
Boruch_Nicholas_PPP
Boruch_Nicholas_PPPBoruch_Nicholas_PPP
Boruch_Nicholas_PPP
 
REC201.PDF
REC201.PDFREC201.PDF
REC201.PDF
 
Face-to-Face
Face-to-FaceFace-to-Face
Face-to-Face
 
Storyboard
StoryboardStoryboard
Storyboard
 
20151106091843405
2015110609184340520151106091843405
20151106091843405
 
module for journalists
module for journalistsmodule for journalists
module for journalists
 
NATHANIEL CV
NATHANIEL CVNATHANIEL CV
NATHANIEL CV
 

Similar to Research Ethics and the IRB

2. Lecture on Research Ethics for Epid 2022 (2).pdf
2.  Lecture on Research Ethics for Epid 2022 (2).pdf2.  Lecture on Research Ethics for Epid 2022 (2).pdf
2. Lecture on Research Ethics for Epid 2022 (2).pdfAnaolAbebe
 
Introduction to research ethics
Introduction to research ethicsIntroduction to research ethics
Introduction to research ethicsTamer Hifnawy
 
You should address the following questions in writing your Op-Ed.docx
You should address the following questions in writing your Op-Ed.docxYou should address the following questions in writing your Op-Ed.docx
You should address the following questions in writing your Op-Ed.docxjeffevans62972
 
General Ethics.ppthghhgghhgghfddddghhhgjhh
General Ethics.ppthghhgghhgghfddddghhhgjhhGeneral Ethics.ppthghhgghhgghfddddghhhgjhh
General Ethics.ppthghhgghhgghfddddghhhgjhhKennyjrLMunisi
 
Ethics and nursing research
Ethics and nursing researchEthics and nursing research
Ethics and nursing researchRafath Razia
 
Ethical principles for conducting research with human participants
Ethical principles for conducting research with human participantsEthical principles for conducting research with human participants
Ethical principles for conducting research with human participantsRaghad Abutair
 
Research Ethics ARC Speakers Series v4.0
Research Ethics ARC Speakers Series v4.0Research Ethics ARC Speakers Series v4.0
Research Ethics ARC Speakers Series v4.0James Goho
 
ETHICAL ISSUES IN BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH
ETHICAL ISSUES IN BIOMEDICAL RESEARCHETHICAL ISSUES IN BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH
ETHICAL ISSUES IN BIOMEDICAL RESEARCHHealth Forager
 
Ethical Issues in Medical Research_12 Jan 2017_Fortis Mulund.ppt
Ethical Issues in Medical Research_12 Jan 2017_Fortis Mulund.pptEthical Issues in Medical Research_12 Jan 2017_Fortis Mulund.ppt
Ethical Issues in Medical Research_12 Jan 2017_Fortis Mulund.pptRitaLakhani2
 
The Pros And Cons Of Human Experimentation
The Pros And Cons Of Human ExperimentationThe Pros And Cons Of Human Experimentation
The Pros And Cons Of Human ExperimentationAmanda Burkett
 
5.ethical consideration in research
5.ethical consideration in research5.ethical consideration in research
5.ethical consideration in researchAESHA ZAFNA
 
Statistical thinking in Medicine (Historical Overview)
Statistical thinking in Medicine (Historical Overview)Statistical thinking in Medicine (Historical Overview)
Statistical thinking in Medicine (Historical Overview)Christos Argyropoulos
 
Research Ethics 20th Nov 09 Arec
Research Ethics 20th Nov 09 ArecResearch Ethics 20th Nov 09 Arec
Research Ethics 20th Nov 09 ArecColin_Standfield
 
As I began reading the four case studies, I had realized just .docx
As I began reading the four case studies, I had realized just .docxAs I began reading the four case studies, I had realized just .docx
As I began reading the four case studies, I had realized just .docxfredharris32
 

Similar to Research Ethics and the IRB (18)

2. Lecture on Research Ethics for Epid 2022 (2).pdf
2.  Lecture on Research Ethics for Epid 2022 (2).pdf2.  Lecture on Research Ethics for Epid 2022 (2).pdf
2. Lecture on Research Ethics for Epid 2022 (2).pdf
 
Introduction to research ethics
Introduction to research ethicsIntroduction to research ethics
Introduction to research ethics
 
Ethical issues (2)
Ethical issues (2)Ethical issues (2)
Ethical issues (2)
 
You should address the following questions in writing your Op-Ed.docx
You should address the following questions in writing your Op-Ed.docxYou should address the following questions in writing your Op-Ed.docx
You should address the following questions in writing your Op-Ed.docx
 
General Ethics.ppthghhgghhgghfddddghhhgjhh
General Ethics.ppthghhgghhgghfddddghhhgjhhGeneral Ethics.ppthghhgghhgghfddddghhhgjhh
General Ethics.ppthghhgghhgghfddddghhhgjhh
 
Ethics and nursing research
Ethics and nursing researchEthics and nursing research
Ethics and nursing research
 
Ethical principles for conducting research with human participants
Ethical principles for conducting research with human participantsEthical principles for conducting research with human participants
Ethical principles for conducting research with human participants
 
Research Ethics ARC Speakers Series v4.0
Research Ethics ARC Speakers Series v4.0Research Ethics ARC Speakers Series v4.0
Research Ethics ARC Speakers Series v4.0
 
ETHICAL ISSUES IN BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH
ETHICAL ISSUES IN BIOMEDICAL RESEARCHETHICAL ISSUES IN BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH
ETHICAL ISSUES IN BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH
 
Ethical Issues in Medical Research_12 Jan 2017_Fortis Mulund.ppt
Ethical Issues in Medical Research_12 Jan 2017_Fortis Mulund.pptEthical Issues in Medical Research_12 Jan 2017_Fortis Mulund.ppt
Ethical Issues in Medical Research_12 Jan 2017_Fortis Mulund.ppt
 
The Pros And Cons Of Human Experimentation
The Pros And Cons Of Human ExperimentationThe Pros And Cons Of Human Experimentation
The Pros And Cons Of Human Experimentation
 
5.ethical consideration in research
5.ethical consideration in research5.ethical consideration in research
5.ethical consideration in research
 
Research Ethics
Research EthicsResearch Ethics
Research Ethics
 
Statistical thinking in Medicine (Historical Overview)
Statistical thinking in Medicine (Historical Overview)Statistical thinking in Medicine (Historical Overview)
Statistical thinking in Medicine (Historical Overview)
 
Ethics in health research
Ethics in health researchEthics in health research
Ethics in health research
 
Research Ethics 20th Nov 09 Arec
Research Ethics 20th Nov 09 ArecResearch Ethics 20th Nov 09 Arec
Research Ethics 20th Nov 09 Arec
 
As I began reading the four case studies, I had realized just .docx
As I began reading the four case studies, I had realized just .docxAs I began reading the four case studies, I had realized just .docx
As I began reading the four case studies, I had realized just .docx
 
IRB Basics
IRB BasicsIRB Basics
IRB Basics
 

Research Ethics and the IRB

  • 1. A brief history of modern research ethics and the IRB Zoltan Boka Director of Research Compliance and Bioethics Lehman College
  • 2.  Testing ideas and hypotheses by performing experiments involving people has a long history but much of that time has been marred by abuse  For example, in 1718, King George I of England offered a pardon to any prisoner in Newgate Prison who agreed to be injected with the smallpox virus as part of an experiment to find a vaccine. (Huth, 2006)
  • 3.  You’re a prisoner in England in 1718: The King offers you a choice- get out now and be infected with the smallpox virus, or be free of the virus but remain in jail.  Is that really a choice?  The first task of IRB is to ensure that consent is freely given. This is more complicated than it sounds.
  • 4.  The Nuremberg Code was developed in the aftermath of the discovery that Nazis conducted human experimentation on prisoners in concentration camps.  The Code has three requirements for consent: That one have a) the capacity to consent, b) a freedom from coercion, and c) comprehension of the risks and benefits involved
  • 5.  King George has an idea: He would like to try out the vaccine for smallpox on prisoners and gives you two scenarios:  1) A prisoner who consents to a trial gets a pardon and one who does not consent stays in jail.  2) Every prisoner gets an injection and will be told that it is to help advance science but not told what it is.  What do you think?
  • 6.  Between 1932 and 1972, the U.S. Health Service told poor African-American men in Alabama that they were receiving free medical care when in actuality, they were not being treated at all as physicians watched the disease progress and individuals infect others.  In 1974, Congress established 45 CFR Part 46, which discusses the process by which institutions obtain informed consent.
  • 7.  First, you need to ask yourself whether what you’re doing is human research:  Are you conducting human research or clinical investigations on human participants?  Scenario: You are interested in how life expectancy has grown between 1800 and 1900. You look up death records to compile a list of how long people in Bronx County lived before dying between 1800 and 1900. Is this human research?
  • 8.  Once you know that you need IRB approval for human research, you need certification.  A certificate is generally good for up to three years. Anyone who wants to work on human subject research must have one.  Once you are armed with a certificate, you have to think about the design of your study.
  • 9.  “The third experiment…took such an extraordinary course that I called an SS physician of the camp as witness, since I had worked on these experiments all by myself. It was a continuous experiment without oxygen at a height of 12 kilometers conducted on a 37year–old Jew in good general condition. Breathing continued up to 30 minutes. After 4 minutes the experimental subject began to perspire and wiggle his head, after 5 minutes cramps occurred, between 6 and 10 minutes breathing increased in speed and the experimental subject became unconscious; from 11 to 30 minutes breathing slowed down to three breaths per minute, finally stopping altogether.” (Katz, 1992)
  • 10.  These slides are just a primer. As you do research, you will find yourself in many situations where you have questions: The IRB office can answer most of these issues.  Once you’ve decided that a) you are going to do research and b) involving human beings, you must ask yourself: What, who and why?
  • 11.  What procedures will you use?  What equipment will you need?  What space will you conduct your experiments in? (If you are use more than one space, sometimes you will need more than one approval.)
  • 12.  Who are you? What makes you qualified?  Who will you be working with? (Even assistants who are students will need to be certified.)  Who is the population you’ll be studying? If you are working with sick people, children, prisoners or a specific vulnerable segment of the population, you’ll face more scrutiny.  Ask yourself who will be participating in your study.
  • 13.  For IRB this is the most important question and it permeates everything:  Why will you be performing this test instead of something else?  Why will you be looking at this population?  Why do you need a certain number of participants?
  • 14.  Are you someone who “thought out beforehand any accident or situation that might occur, so that you know the right thing to do at the right moment, and are willing to do it”?  Spend twice as much time planning and thinking as you do writing.  Never assume that something can’t happen.
  • 15.  I’m studying stress in athletes. I’m looking at how their heart rate changes as they undergo more difficult exercises.  What should I do?  I’m considering studying a disease and how it effects the spine. The disease can show up in rats and people and effect the spine the same way.  What is your advice?
  • 16.  It is always a good idea to get input from another person; Even better if s/he from outside your field or department.
  • 17.  Huth, E. (2006). Quantitative evidence for judgments on the efficacy of inoculation for the prevention of smallpox: England and New England in the 1700s. Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 99(5), 262-266.  Katz, J. (1992). Abuse of human beings for the sake of science. In When medicine went mad (pp. 233-270). Humana Press.