SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 10
Download to read offline
Indol 3- Acidic Acid (IAA) and Kinetin
Influnce on Root Border Cells Production
Zina Al-Saffar; Senin Ermisilia and Robin Vervoorn
AVANS University of Applied Science – ATGM department-Breda
Abstract
Root border cells are metabolically active cells that are released from a plant root tip into the
rhizosphere. Root border cells are recently used as a source to quantify genotype and phenotype.
The aim of this study was to stimulate and enhance root border cells production for cucumber,
lettuce and tomato using kinetin and indole-3 acidic acid (IAA) as stimulus. The seeds were
challenged with 4 different concentrations of kinetin and IAA (0.01 µM, 0.1 µM, 1 µM and 10 µM),
control seeds were germinated using tap water. Following germination, seeds with emerged roots
were examined for root border cells production and border cells were counted using a light-
microscope. DNA from harvested cells was extracted and further used for PCR assay. Results showed
that IAA and kinetin stimulated the three crops under study to increase border cells production. The
cucumber had higher root border cells production at 0.1 µM for both IAA and kinetin hormones, the
tomato seeds showed increase in border cells number at 10 µM kinetin and the lettuce showed
increase at 0.01µM for kinetin and 10 µM for IAA. No single hormone concentration or exact
hormone type that caused the increase was able to be determined as the three crops responded
differently to the different hormone concentrations and for the both two hormones. Adult plant
from seeds germinated in IAA and kinetin showed different root grew and development, plant grew
in IAA showed long, smooth root with branched root were is plant grew in kinetin showed dwarfed,
rough root with no branch root formation. The polymerized chain reaction amplified fragments on
agarose gel were within the expected sizes. Lettuce showed fragments with a size of (+/-250 bp) and
(+/- 350 bp) for tomato.
Introduction
Root border cells are metabolically active cells
that are released from a plant root tip into the
rhizosphere [1] .Root border cells provide a
biotic boundary between the rhizosphere and
the root which is fundamental for the
rhizosphere modification [2]. The function of
the root border cells is to provide
environmental protection for the growing root
tip by regulating the balance of the pathogenic
- and beneficial microorganisms and excessive
minerals in the rhizosphere. [1] [2]
The root tip is essential to the plants
survival. [3] Within the root tip is the root
apical meristem region (RAM). From the RAM
region all the primary root tissue and the root
cap are derived. The RAM consists of cells that
are actively engaged in division, growth and
differentiation. [4]. The production of border
cells appear to be regulated, but little is
known about this process. Border cell
production is thought to be a continuous by-
product of constitutive turnover of the root
cap [5], but recent studies reported that
border cell separation is not necessarily
continuous but can be turned on and off by
the plant by controlled endogenous and
environmental signals and can also be induced
experimentally [6] [7]. A research conducted
on pea (Pisum sativum) showed that a high
concentration of carbon dioxide admitted in
the soil atmosphere can override endogenous
signals that regulate the amount of root
border cells that are being released by the
plant into the rhizosphere. [8]
Auxin and cytokinin are both plant
hormones that stimulate plant growth. Auxin
plays an important role in coordinating plant
development signals and root cap [9] [10].
Indole-3 acidic acid (IAA) which is one of the
forms of auxin that is responsible for the root
system architecture and various stage of root
development. Cytokinin stimulates cytokinesis
(cell division). A study revealed that cytokinin
deficiency reduces root meristem size and
activity. Many studies clearly suggest that
cytokinin affects the RAM [11] [12] [13] [14].
Additionally, auxin and cytokinin opposed
interaction plays an important role in
controlling the root meristem development.
This interaction is regulated through certain
integrators that regulate auxin and cytokinin
metabolisms and signaling pathway to
determine a specific developmental output in
the root meristem.
Recently, interests in using border
cells as a tool in plant studies have been
increased because of their low cost and
simplicity of obtaining required materials. In
addition border cells can be obtained from a
single plant and within relatively short time.
Expression of transferred genes in border cells
can also be studied as they are differentiated
cells and they can be easily adapted to a wide
range of biochemical, physiological and
molecular biological assays [15]. The objective
of this study which was carried out at AVANS
university of applied science – Breda and
supported by Rijk Zwaan – Fijnaart, was to find
a method to increase the production of root
border cells either by changing environmental
conditions or by changing endogenous
signalling. Here, IAA and kinetin will be tested
to study their role to influence the root tip
Ram tissue to increase border cells
production. The plants that were challenged
were cucumber (Cucumis sativus), lettuce
(Lactuca sativa) and tomato (Solanum
lycopersicum).
Additionally, auxin and cytokinin opposed
interaction plays an important role in
controlling the root meristem development.
This interaction is regulated through certain
integrators that regulate auxin and cytokinin
metabolisms and signaling pathway to
determine a specific developmental output in
the root meristem.
Materials and methods
Seeds Sterilization and Germination
The three types of seeds used in this
research, cucumber, tomato and lettuce, were
kindly delivered by Rijk Zwaan. The first step
in the research was to germinate the seeds.
The tomato seeds were surface sterilized in
0.5% NaOCl (Sigma Aldrich) for 45 minutes .
Seeds then were rinsed in sterilized distilled
water six times before germination. A stock
solution with a concentration of (10 mM) was
used to prepare the four concentrations of
Indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) hormone (Sigma
Aldrich) and Kinetin (Sigma Aldrich). IAA was
dissolved in 1ml of 0.1 % DMSO (Emplura),
kinetin was dissolved with 1ml of 1M of NaOH
(Sigma Aldrich, Netherlands). These solutions
were brought up to final volume of 10ml with
PBS. The following concentrations were
prepared from the previously prepared stock
solutions (0.01; 0.1; 1 and 10 µM) and used for
seeds treatment. The control seeds were
germinated in tap water. All the seeds were
germinated in eco-tubes (Thermo Fisher). The
cucumber seeds were germinated in 100 µl
solution. The lettuce and tomato seeds were
germinated in 30 µl solution. The cucumber
and the tomato seeds were incubated at 26oC
(Ika KS 4000 I). The lettuce seeds were
incubated at room temperature 20°C. Once
root emerged, seeds were checked for border
cells production.
Border Cells Counting
All seeds with root length between
(0.5 - 2 mm) were collected, washed with
100µl PBS, vortexed for 1min and border cells
were harvested by centrifugation for 10min at
1300 rpm (Eppendorf) . The pellet containing
border cells was dissolved with 30µl PBS and
samples from each treatment were pooled
together and border cells were counted with
Bürker-Türk counting chamber slide
(Marienfeld), the number of border cells
counted was calculated by the mean number
of cells per plant by dividing the number of
cells counted by the number of seeds were
the border cells were harvested from. The
solution containing the remains of cells were
then stored at -20o
C to extract DNA.
DNA extraction
The DNA from the previously
harvested border cells was extracted using
Extract-N-Amp kit (Sigma Aldrich). Leaves
from an adult plant of crop under the study
were used as a positive control. An adjustable
volume of the extraction buffer was added to
volume of the border cells solution and the
leaf sample. The sample was then vortexed
briefly for 1min and further incubated at 95°C
in a water bath for 30min. After incubation, an
equal volume of the dilution solution was
added, briefly mixed and samples were then
stored at -20o
C to be used for PCR assay.
DNA Purification
Before the DNA was used for PCR, the
DNA was purified by adding an equal volume
of Phenol-Chloroform-isoamylalcohol (Sigma
Aldrich) to the extracted DNA solutions.
Afterwards, the solutions were vortexed and
centrifuged for 2 minutes at 14000 rpm. A 350
µl of the supernatant was transferred to a
clean 1.5 ml tube and 1 ml of 100% ethanol
was added to the supernatant, vortexed
briefly and incubated at -20°C for 10 minutes.
Then the solution was centrifuged for 20
minutes at 14000 rpm and 500 µl of 70%
ethanol was added to the pellet. The mixture
was vortexed and centrifuged for 5 minutes at
14000 rpm. The pellet was dried by incubating
at 40°C. In the final step, 50 µl of milliQ was
added to the pellet to dissolve the
precipitated DNA.
PCR and Gel Electrophoresis
The PCR reaction was carried out for
the previously extracted DNA of the harvested
border cells. For 20 µl PCR product, 1 µl of
each specific crop primer was added to 4 µl
DNA template, 4 µl PCR level water and 10 µl
of Extract-N-Amp PCR Ready Mix (Sigma
Aldrich). The PCR program was set for: Initial
denaturation at 94°C for three minutes,
regular denaturation at 94°C for 1 minute,
annealing at 52°C (lettuce), 58°C ( tomato) and
55°C (cucumber) for 1 minute, extension at
72°C for 1 minute and final extension at 72°C
for 10 minutes. The amplified fragments were
visualized on 1% agarose gel. [16]
Results and Discussion
Effect of Altered IAA and Kinetin
Hormone Concentrations on
Germination, Root Growth and Border
Cell Number
Germination and Root Growth
Cucumber, Tomato and Lettuce
The effects of IAA and Kinetin on root
growth and cells differentiation can be seen in
Fig. 1. In the IAA treatment the germinated
seeds showed long, smooth root grew with
visible lateral branched roots, while in Kinetin
treatment, germinated seeds showed rough,
dwarf roots grew with no lateral roots
formation.
Antagonistic effects of IAA and kinetin
similarly control the growth and the
outgrowth of branches in root. The high
localized Auxin concentration in the quiescent
center of the root tip meristematic cells is
responsible to maintain stem cells population,
cell elongation and outgrowth initiation of the
lateral roots. Whereas; just above the
meristem, in the transition zone, cytokinin
(Kinetin) represses auxin movement from the
tip and auxin action thus represses cell
elongation and lateral roots initiation [17]. In
another word, the distance of the lateral root
initiation from the root tip is regulated by
Cytokinin concentration. The high Cytokinin
concentration at the root cap represses IAA
action and inhibits lateral root initiation in the
surrounding area of the tip, which is crucial for
enabling uninterrupted elongation zone, thus
ensuring the elongation of smooth primary
root tip free from lateral roots. Above the
elongation zone, where concentrations of
Cytokinin decrease, lateral roots can initiate
[18]. These hormonal mechanism roles for
both IAA and Kinetin on root growth can
explain the different root shapes of our
challenged seeds. The germination of seeds in
presence of Kinetin hormone inhibited the
Auxin action which is necessary for root
elongation and lateral branched root
initiation.
Border Cell number
Cucumber
After 24h germination in eco tubes
containing 30µl of the different hormone
concentrations, seeds with root length
between (0.5 -1 mm) were washed and the
harvested border cells were counted. The
highest production of the border cells was
observed when seeds were germinated in 0.1
µM for both IAA and kinetin hormone. The
Figure 1. Effects of IAA and Kinetin hormones on root
growth and development. Cucumber seeds germinated in
0.1 uM Kinetin (upper plant) and 0.1uM IAA (lower plant)
for 7 days at 26
o
C.
number of border cells was (32000
cell/ml/plant) and (9800 cell/ml/plant)
respectively, compared with (5750
cell/ml/plant) from seeds grown in tap water
(control), (Figure 2). No border cells were
counted when root length exceeded 2.5 cm.
Tomato
Tomato seeds were germinated for 7
days in eco tubes with 30µl of different kinetin
and IAA concentrations. In each treatment,
border cells were harvested pooled together
and counted. The root length ranged between
(0.5 – 2 mm), the highest number of border
cells (7500 cell/ml/plant) was observed when
seeds were grown in (10 µM) Kinetin
compared with (3500 cell/ml/plant) of seeds
grown in tap water (Figure 3). No border cells
were able to be harvested from seeds
challenged with different IAA concentration as
the roots length were still too short to
produce border cells at the time of cell
counting. Additionally, no difference in seeds
germination was observed, when seeds were
either sterilized or not sterilized (results not
shown). Though, sterilization of the seeds
helped to avoid sample contamination that
usually accompanied with long incubation
time.
Lettuce
When lettuce seeds were grown in
different IAA and Kinetin concentrations until
root is (0.5 - 1 mm) long. Roots were washed
and border cells from each treatment
harvested, pooled together and counted.
Seeds challenged with (1.0 µM) IAA and (0.01
µM) Kinetin showed increase in border cells
production. The counted border cell number
was 13750 cell/ml/plant compared with 7500
cell/ml/plant from control seeds. No border
cells were harvested when seeds grown in 10
µM of IAA and Kinetin hormones, (Figure 4).
Figure 3. Different effects of Kinetin hormone on
Border cells production for Tomato seeds. Tomato
seeds germinated in different Kinetin concentrations
for 7days, Seeds from each treatment with root length
between (0.5-2mm) were washed with PBS pooled
together and counted using counting chamber.
Seeds challenged with IAA and Kinetin
hormones showed increase in border cells
production compared with seeds grown in tap
water. Crops responded differently to the
tested hormones, as each crop influenced by
Figure 2. Effect of different IAA and Kinetin concentration
on border cells production for cucumber seeds. Seeds
germinated in 30µl of different IAA and Kinetin hormones
for 7 days at 26
o
C. Border cells from seeds with root length
of (0.5-1mm) of each treatment were harvested pooled
together and counted using counting chamber.
different hormone type and different
hormone concentration, as no single hormone
type or certain hormone concentration caused
the increase in border cells production. Plant
regulates border cells release during growth
and development and in response to different
environmental effects [18]. Auxin and IAA are
shown to increase ethylene production in root
tip [17]. This increase is shown to induce the
release of border cells from the root tip [19].
The release of cells from the root tip into the
surrounding will stimulate the root tip to
produce new set of border cells as their
accumulation on the root tip ceases the
border cells meristem to produce new cells
[20] [16]. The quantitative increase in border
cells number indicate an important role for
IAA and Kinetin phytohormones on border
cells production, a hypothesis that requires
future work to validate it.
Border Cells as Simple Research Tool for
PCR Assay
The harvested cells from the above
experiments were used as resource for
genomic and biotechnological studies. DNA
was extracted from the harvested Border cells
of (tomato, lettuce and cucumber) and further
used for PCR assay. A specific 350-bp fragment
of T26 for tomato crop was polymerase chain
reaction amplified using primer 1 (5’
-
GGCTTCTACTTGTGCAGTTTCG-3
’
) and
primer 2 (3’
- GCTTGACAGGATCAAAATTGG-5’
),
(Figure 5). 250-bp fragment of R17a for
Lettuce was amplified using primer 1 (5’
-
GTCGCAATCAACACAACGG-3’
) and primer 2 (3’
-
GTGAACTTAGGTGCAAATAAGAAAG-5’), (Figure
6). All amplified fragments were within the
expected size. The presence of band in the
negative control for Lettuce indicates the
contamination of the sample with plant
material. The PCR amplified products of the
cucumber border cells showed nonspecific
bands with large size on agarose gel (results
not shown).
Figure 4. Different effects of IAA and Kinetin hormones on
Border cell production for Lettuce seeds. Seeds germinated in
different IAA and kinetin hormones for 4 days. Border cells
from seeds with root length (0.5-1mm) were harvested,
pooled together and counted using counting champers.
Figure 5. Amplified fragment of T26 in tomato. Lane 1:
mole marker III; lane 2: 0.01µM kin; lane 3: 0.1µM kin; lane
4: 1µM kin; lane 5: 10µM kin; lane 6 tab water; lane 7 (+)
control leaf DNA; lane 8: (-) control; lane 9: mole marker
VII.
Border cells have multiple biological
functions in enhancing root growth, defending
plant root from all kinds of dangers and
regulating populations of soil borne microflora
in the rizosphere. Hence, genes expressed by
border cells can be used for the controlled
delivery of chemicals into the root tip region
where water and nutrient uptake, gravity
sensing as well as infection by pathogens and
symbionts is initiated [21] [22]. Recent studies
have reported that border cells share similar
functional roles in defense to those of
mammalian white blood cells in which a “trap”
consisting of extracellular DNA (exDNA) and
antimicrobial proteins function in immune
responses to microbial pathogens [20] [21].
Border cells traps bacteria and fungi in a host-
microbe specific manner by producing a
complex of exDNA and antimicrobial proteins,
a defense mechanism that is similar to that
found in neutrophil cells [23] [24]. By other
studies it was proposed that root cap
functions in a manner similar to that of
mammalian brain stem and that of bone
marrow in its capacity to control programmed
movement in response to specific pathogens
environmental or signals [21]. A better
understanding of border cell genes controlling
this process may yield new insights into
factors underlying root- rhizosphere
community structure and its role in crop
production [25].
Moreover, in many plant root studies
determining the number of the released
border cells is required. Using the traditional
quantitative methods, border cells counting
can be expensive and time consuming
especially when there are several numbers of
plants under study or when the cells sample is
contaminated. Thus, looking for alternative
method that is time efficient and less
expensive is required. Using specific primer
design for a gene or sequence that is
expressed constitutively in root border cells
(i.e. Brd13) [26] along with qPCR can be used
as an economic method for quantifying single
species cell number [27].
Statistic
Border cell numbers represent the
mean number of seedlings used. Variation
measurement within the same group was not
calculated because the samples from each
treatment were pool together and counted.
Conclusions
Both IAA and Kinetin increased border
cells production in all the three tested crops.
No specific hormone concentration was able
to be determined as plants responded
differently to different hormone
concentrations and different hormone type.
Figure 6. Amplified fragment of R17a in Lettuce. Lane 1:
Mole Marker III; lane 2: 10µM IAA; lane 3: 1µM IAA; lane 4:
0.1µM IAA; lane 5: 0.01µM IAA; lane 6: 10 µM kinetin; lane
7: 1µM kinetin; lane 8: 0.1µM kinetin; lane 9: 0.01µM
kinetin; lane 10: (+) control; lane 11: tab water; lane 12: (-)
control; lane 13: mole marker VII.
Sterilization of the seeds before
germination did not affect root grow or
border cells production, but it helped to
reduce sample contamination.
DNA extracted from border cells can
be used to study genes expressed in root tip
or other biotechnological analysis. In our
study, we were not able to use the thickness
of bands formed on agarose gel to calculate
the number of border cells used to extract
DNA, as the sample contained traces of root
and plant pieces. Thus it was not possible to
make sure that the extracted DNA represent
border cells only.
Recommendation
Differences in germination rate within
the same set of seeds were one of the
problems we encountered. Thus, germinating
more seeds for each experiment can help to
select a group of seeds within a close root
length.
A recent study [26], reported that
brd13 gene is expressed constitutively in
border cells. Thus, using specific primers
sequences for Brd13 along with qPCR assay
can be used as a new method to count border
cells [27].
We also recommend to test the effect
of another interesting enzyme (Pectin Methyl
Esterase PME) on Border cells production as
previous studies showed that it help to release
border cells from the root tip and increase
their production [17] [4] [19].
Acknowledgment
We sincerely thank Dr. Robert Sijbrandi for his
scientific comments and guidance, Dr.
Jojanneke Welzen and Paul de Graag from Rijk
Zwaan for their warming helps.
Bibliography
[1] B. Plancot and C. e. a. Santaella, “NCBI,”
Plant Physiol, Deciphering the Responses
of Root Border-Like Cells of Arabidopsis
and Flax to Pathogen-Derived Elicitors,
2013.
[2] B. S. Watson and M. F. Bedair,
“Integrated Metabolomics and
Transcriptomics Reveal Enhanced
Specialized Metabolism in Medicago
truncatula Root Border Cells,” PLant
Physiol, 2015.
[3] M. C. Hawes, U. Gunawardena, S.
Miyasaka and X. Zhao, “The role of root
border in plant cells defence,” Tends n
plant science, 2000.
[4] L. HAMAMOTO, M. C. HAWES and T. L.
ROST, “The Production and Release of
Living Root Cap Border Cells is a Function
of Root Apical Meristem Type in
Dicotyledonous Angiosperm Plants,”
Annals of botany, 2006.
[5] L. Lowes, “Origin of the Epidermis in Root
Meristems,” New Phytol, vol. 127, pp.
335-347, 1994.
[6] M. C. Hawes, U. Gunawardena and S.
Miyasaka, “The role of root border cells in
plant defense,” TRENDS IN PLANT
SCIENCE, APRIL (2000).
[7] X. Zhao, M. J. Iraj and M. C. Hawes,
“Stimulation of Border Cell Production in
Response to Increased Carbon Dioxide
Level,” Plant Physiology, vol. Vol 122, p.
181–188, January 2000.
[8] X. Zhao, I. J. Misaghi and M. C. Hawes*,
“Stimulation of Border Cell Production in
Response to,” Plant Physiology, Tucson,
Arizona 85721, 2000.
[9] P. Overvoorde, H. Fukaki and T.
Beeckman, “Auxin Control of Root
Development,” Cold Spring Harbor
Perspect Biology, 2010.
[10] S. Saini, I. Sharma, N. Kaur and K. Pati,
“Auxin: a master regulator in plant root
development,” Plant Cell Rep, vol. 32, p.
741–757, 2013.
[11] S. Ying-Hua, Y.-B. Liu and X.-S. Zhang,
“Auxin–Cytokinin Interaction Regulates
Meristem Development,” Molecular
Plant, vol. 4, p. 616–625, 2011.
[12] F. Skoog and C. O. Miller, “Chemical
regulation of growth and organ formation
in plant tissues cultured in vitro,” Symp
Soc Exp Biol, vol. 54, p. 118–30, 1957.
[13] T. Werner, V. Motyka, V. Laucou, R.
Smets, H. Van Onckelen and T.
Schmulling, “Cytokinin-deficient
transgenic Arabidopsis plants show
multiple developmental alterations
indicating opposite functions of
cytokinins in the regulation of shoot and
root meristem active,” Plant Cell, vol. 15,
p. 2532–50, 2003.
[14] K. Miyawaki, M. Matsumoto-Kitano and
T. Kakimoto, “Expression of cytokinin
biosynthetic isopentenyltransferase
genes in Arabidopsis: tissue specificity
and regulation by auxin, cytokinin, and
nitrate,” Plant J, vol. 37, p. 128–38, 2004.
[15] D. W. Galbriath, H. J. Bohnert and D. P.
Bourque, “Root Border Cells as Tools in
Plant Cells Studies,” in Methods in Plant
Cell Biology, Arizona , 1995, pp. 377-387.
[16] C. H. Martha and H.-J. Lin, “Correlation of
Pectolytic Enzyme Activity with the
Programmed Release of Cells from Root
Caps of Pea (Pisum sativum),” Plant
Physiol, vol. 94, pp. 1855-1859, 1990.
[17] P. GEORGINA, W. B. PETER, J. F. LEWIS
and I. C. GLADYS, “Auxin and ethylene
interactions control mitotic activity of the
quiescent centre, root cap size, and
pattern of cap cell differentiation in
maize,” Plant, Cell and Enviroment , vol.
28, no. 6, pp. 719 - 732, 2005.
[18] H. C. Martha and H.-J. Lin, “ Correlation of
Pectolytic Enzyme Activity with the
Programmed Release of Cells from Root
Caps of Pea (Pisum sativum),” Plant
Physiol, vol. 94, pp. 1855-1859, 1990.
[19] Y. Fuchs and M. Lieberman, “Effects of
Kinetin, IAA, and Gibberellin on Ethylene
Production, and Their Interactions in
Growth of Seedlings,” Plant Physiol, vol.
43, pp. 2029-2036, 1968.
[20] P. Cooper, L. Palmer and I. Chapple,
“Neutrophil extracellular traps as a new
paradigm in innate immunity,”
Periodontol , vol. 2000 , no. 63, p. 165–
197, 2013.
[21] M. E, “Neutrophil extracellular traps: a
strategic tactic to defeat pathogens with
potential consequences for the host,” J
Innate Immun , vol. 1, p. 176–179, 2009.
[22] J. Pan, M. ZHU, H. Peng and L. Wang,
“Developmental Regulation and Biological
functions of Root Border Cells in High
Plants,” Acta Botanica Sinica, vol. 44 (1),
pp. 1-8, 2002.
[23] F. Wen, G. White, Z. Xiong, H. VanEtten
and M. Hawes, “Extracellular DNA is
required for root tip resistance to fungal
infection,” Plant Physiol , vol. 151, p. 820–
829, 2009 .
[24] F. Wen, H. Woo, E. Pierson, T. Elduset, C.
Fossdal, N. Nagy and M. Hawes,
“Synchronous elicitation of development
in root caps induces transient gene
expression changes common to legume
and gymnosperm species,” Plant Mol Biol
Rep , vol. 27, p. 58–68, 2009.
[25] M. Hawes, G. Curlango-Rivera, Z. Xiong
and J. Kessler, “Roles of root border cells
in plant defense and regulation of
rhizosphere microbial populations by
extracellular DNA trapping,” Plant Soil,
vol. 355, p. 1–16, 2012.
[26] W. Fushi, A. B. Lindy, C.-R. Gilberto, X.
Zhongguo and C. H. Martha, “ Altered
growth and root tip morphology in Pisum
sativum L. in response to altered
expression of a gene expressed in border
cells,” Plant Soil, vol. 377, p. 179–187,
2014.
[27] H. Ruijie, Z. X. Junjie, Y. Frank and G.
Richard L., “PCR-Based Multiple Species
Cell Counting for In Vitro Mixed Culture,”
Plos One , pp. 1-13, 2015.

More Related Content

What's hot

Somaclonal variation
Somaclonal variationSomaclonal variation
Somaclonal variationRakesh Kumar
 
Genetics and breeding of cultivated mushroom
Genetics and breeding of cultivated mushroomGenetics and breeding of cultivated mushroom
Genetics and breeding of cultivated mushroomRahulselvaraj
 
Chloroplast transformation
Chloroplast transformationChloroplast transformation
Chloroplast transformationshahnam azizi
 
Mutation breeding in fruit crops
Mutation breeding in fruit cropsMutation breeding in fruit crops
Mutation breeding in fruit cropsNandhiniMohan16
 
INPLANTA TRANSGENIC APPROACH FOR CROP IMPROVEMENT
INPLANTA TRANSGENIC APPROACH FOR CROP IMPROVEMENTINPLANTA TRANSGENIC APPROACH FOR CROP IMPROVEMENT
INPLANTA TRANSGENIC APPROACH FOR CROP IMPROVEMENTJyoti Prakash Sahoo
 
Ab206 hormones 3 cytokinins & florigen
Ab206 hormones 3 cytokinins & florigenAb206 hormones 3 cytokinins & florigen
Ab206 hormones 3 cytokinins & florigenrachjade
 
Somatic Embryogenesis in Pearl Millet (Pennisetum Glaucum (L) R.Br.) Using Li...
Somatic Embryogenesis in Pearl Millet (Pennisetum Glaucum (L) R.Br.) Using Li...Somatic Embryogenesis in Pearl Millet (Pennisetum Glaucum (L) R.Br.) Using Li...
Somatic Embryogenesis in Pearl Millet (Pennisetum Glaucum (L) R.Br.) Using Li...IOSR Journals
 
Growth Pattern, Molecular Identification and Bio molecules Analysis of FOMITO...
Growth Pattern, Molecular Identification and Bio molecules Analysis of FOMITO...Growth Pattern, Molecular Identification and Bio molecules Analysis of FOMITO...
Growth Pattern, Molecular Identification and Bio molecules Analysis of FOMITO...journal ijrtem
 
Characterizing auxin biosynthetic mutants in arabidopsis thaliana - First Paper
Characterizing auxin biosynthetic mutants in arabidopsis thaliana - First PaperCharacterizing auxin biosynthetic mutants in arabidopsis thaliana - First Paper
Characterizing auxin biosynthetic mutants in arabidopsis thaliana - First PaperNicole Colon
 
Gene Silencing in Fruit Crops
Gene Silencing in Fruit CropsGene Silencing in Fruit Crops
Gene Silencing in Fruit Crops_mk_ saini
 
plant growth regulators : GA & cytokinin
plant growth regulators : GA & cytokininplant growth regulators : GA & cytokinin
plant growth regulators : GA & cytokininatmuri naga tharun
 
Genetic Engineering for Male Sterility in Plants
Genetic Engineering for Male Sterility in PlantsGenetic Engineering for Male Sterility in Plants
Genetic Engineering for Male Sterility in PlantsNavaneetha Krishnan J
 
STRIGOLACTONES IN PLANT SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT
 STRIGOLACTONES IN PLANT SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT STRIGOLACTONES IN PLANT SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT
STRIGOLACTONES IN PLANT SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION AND DEVELOPMENTBHU,Varanasi, INDIA
 
Hairy root culture
Hairy root cultureHairy root culture
Hairy root cultureAbu Raihan
 

What's hot (20)

Cytokinins
CytokininsCytokinins
Cytokinins
 
Somaclonal variation
Somaclonal variationSomaclonal variation
Somaclonal variation
 
Somaclonal Variation and It's Crop Improvement
Somaclonal Variation and It's Crop ImprovementSomaclonal Variation and It's Crop Improvement
Somaclonal Variation and It's Crop Improvement
 
Geneexpression
GeneexpressionGeneexpression
Geneexpression
 
Genetics and breeding of cultivated mushroom
Genetics and breeding of cultivated mushroomGenetics and breeding of cultivated mushroom
Genetics and breeding of cultivated mushroom
 
Chloroplast transformation
Chloroplast transformationChloroplast transformation
Chloroplast transformation
 
Mutation breeding in fruit crops
Mutation breeding in fruit cropsMutation breeding in fruit crops
Mutation breeding in fruit crops
 
INPLANTA TRANSGENIC APPROACH FOR CROP IMPROVEMENT
INPLANTA TRANSGENIC APPROACH FOR CROP IMPROVEMENTINPLANTA TRANSGENIC APPROACH FOR CROP IMPROVEMENT
INPLANTA TRANSGENIC APPROACH FOR CROP IMPROVEMENT
 
Ab206 hormones 3 cytokinins & florigen
Ab206 hormones 3 cytokinins & florigenAb206 hormones 3 cytokinins & florigen
Ab206 hormones 3 cytokinins & florigen
 
Somatic Embryogenesis in Pearl Millet (Pennisetum Glaucum (L) R.Br.) Using Li...
Somatic Embryogenesis in Pearl Millet (Pennisetum Glaucum (L) R.Br.) Using Li...Somatic Embryogenesis in Pearl Millet (Pennisetum Glaucum (L) R.Br.) Using Li...
Somatic Embryogenesis in Pearl Millet (Pennisetum Glaucum (L) R.Br.) Using Li...
 
Growth Pattern, Molecular Identification and Bio molecules Analysis of FOMITO...
Growth Pattern, Molecular Identification and Bio molecules Analysis of FOMITO...Growth Pattern, Molecular Identification and Bio molecules Analysis of FOMITO...
Growth Pattern, Molecular Identification and Bio molecules Analysis of FOMITO...
 
Characterizing auxin biosynthetic mutants in arabidopsis thaliana - First Paper
Characterizing auxin biosynthetic mutants in arabidopsis thaliana - First PaperCharacterizing auxin biosynthetic mutants in arabidopsis thaliana - First Paper
Characterizing auxin biosynthetic mutants in arabidopsis thaliana - First Paper
 
Gene Silencing in Fruit Crops
Gene Silencing in Fruit CropsGene Silencing in Fruit Crops
Gene Silencing in Fruit Crops
 
plant growth regulators : GA & cytokinin
plant growth regulators : GA & cytokininplant growth regulators : GA & cytokinin
plant growth regulators : GA & cytokinin
 
Breeding 5
Breeding 5Breeding 5
Breeding 5
 
Genetic Engineering for Male Sterility in Plants
Genetic Engineering for Male Sterility in PlantsGenetic Engineering for Male Sterility in Plants
Genetic Engineering for Male Sterility in Plants
 
Cytokinin
Cytokinin Cytokinin
Cytokinin
 
STRIGOLACTONES IN PLANT SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT
 STRIGOLACTONES IN PLANT SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT STRIGOLACTONES IN PLANT SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT
STRIGOLACTONES IN PLANT SIGNAL TRANSDUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT
 
Hairy root culture
Hairy root cultureHairy root culture
Hairy root culture
 
Organellar heterosis
Organellar heterosisOrganellar heterosis
Organellar heterosis
 

Similar to Final articlefinal 2 Zina Senin and Robin

Secondary metabolite from Plant organ culture
Secondary metabolite from  Plant organ cultureSecondary metabolite from  Plant organ culture
Secondary metabolite from Plant organ cultureamvannan
 
In vitro mutagenesis of Cymbidium La bell “Anna Belle” by γ-rays irradiation ...
In vitro mutagenesis of Cymbidium La bell “Anna Belle” by γ-rays irradiation ...In vitro mutagenesis of Cymbidium La bell “Anna Belle” by γ-rays irradiation ...
In vitro mutagenesis of Cymbidium La bell “Anna Belle” by γ-rays irradiation ...IJEAB
 
COMPARATIVE STUDY OF CAPSAICIN FROM IN VITRO CULTIVATED AND NATURALLY CULTIVA...
COMPARATIVE STUDY OF CAPSAICIN FROM IN VITRO CULTIVATED AND NATURALLY CULTIVA...COMPARATIVE STUDY OF CAPSAICIN FROM IN VITRO CULTIVATED AND NATURALLY CULTIVA...
COMPARATIVE STUDY OF CAPSAICIN FROM IN VITRO CULTIVATED AND NATURALLY CULTIVA...Dr Dama
 
Assessment of genetic fidelity of in vitro propagated clones of Celastrus pan...
Assessment of genetic fidelity of in vitro propagated clones of Celastrus pan...Assessment of genetic fidelity of in vitro propagated clones of Celastrus pan...
Assessment of genetic fidelity of in vitro propagated clones of Celastrus pan...iosrjce
 
Ecklonia Maxima Extract Effect in Tissue Regeneration of Symbionts at in Vivo...
Ecklonia Maxima Extract Effect in Tissue Regeneration of Symbionts at in Vivo...Ecklonia Maxima Extract Effect in Tissue Regeneration of Symbionts at in Vivo...
Ecklonia Maxima Extract Effect in Tissue Regeneration of Symbionts at in Vivo...IJEAB
 
In Vitro Shoot Regeneration and Rooting of Piper Longum L.: A valuable Medici...
In Vitro Shoot Regeneration and Rooting of Piper Longum L.: A valuable Medici...In Vitro Shoot Regeneration and Rooting of Piper Longum L.: A valuable Medici...
In Vitro Shoot Regeneration and Rooting of Piper Longum L.: A valuable Medici...AnuragSingh1049
 
Allelopathic Effect of Aqueous Extracts of Parthenium (Parthenium Hysterophor...
Allelopathic Effect of Aqueous Extracts of Parthenium (Parthenium Hysterophor...Allelopathic Effect of Aqueous Extracts of Parthenium (Parthenium Hysterophor...
Allelopathic Effect of Aqueous Extracts of Parthenium (Parthenium Hysterophor...Journal of Agriculture and Crops
 
Phylotype Analysis of Ralstonia Solanacearum Causing Bacterial wilt in Eggpla...
Phylotype Analysis of Ralstonia Solanacearum Causing Bacterial wilt in Eggpla...Phylotype Analysis of Ralstonia Solanacearum Causing Bacterial wilt in Eggpla...
Phylotype Analysis of Ralstonia Solanacearum Causing Bacterial wilt in Eggpla...ijtsrd
 
Cytoprotective and DNA Protective Activity of Carica Papaya Leaf Extracts
Cytoprotective and DNA Protective Activity of Carica Papaya Leaf ExtractsCytoprotective and DNA Protective Activity of Carica Papaya Leaf Extracts
Cytoprotective and DNA Protective Activity of Carica Papaya Leaf Extractsinventionjournals
 
Cytoprotective and DNA Protective Activity of Carica Papaya Leaf Extracts
Cytoprotective and DNA Protective Activity of Carica Papaya Leaf ExtractsCytoprotective and DNA Protective Activity of Carica Papaya Leaf Extracts
Cytoprotective and DNA Protective Activity of Carica Papaya Leaf Extractsinventionjournals
 
Cytoprotective and DNA Protective Activity of Carica Papaya Leaf Extracts
Cytoprotective and DNA Protective Activity of Carica Papaya Leaf ExtractsCytoprotective and DNA Protective Activity of Carica Papaya Leaf Extracts
Cytoprotective and DNA Protective Activity of Carica Papaya Leaf Extractsinventionjournals
 
tissue culture of strawberry
tissue culture of strawberry tissue culture of strawberry
tissue culture of strawberry Abed Hawas
 
Detection of Genetic variation in tissue culture clones of date palm using IS...
Detection of Genetic variation in tissue culture clones of date palm using IS...Detection of Genetic variation in tissue culture clones of date palm using IS...
Detection of Genetic variation in tissue culture clones of date palm using IS...IJSRD
 
Study the anticancer effect of lepidium sativum leaves extract
Study the anticancer effect of lepidium sativum leaves extractStudy the anticancer effect of lepidium sativum leaves extract
Study the anticancer effect of lepidium sativum leaves extractAlexander Decker
 
Micropropagation of large_cardamom_amomu (1)
Micropropagation of large_cardamom_amomu (1)Micropropagation of large_cardamom_amomu (1)
Micropropagation of large_cardamom_amomu (1)Sajina Adam
 
Micropropagation in fruit crops
Micropropagation in fruit cropsMicropropagation in fruit crops
Micropropagation in fruit cropsRajesh Pati
 

Similar to Final articlefinal 2 Zina Senin and Robin (20)

Secondary metabolite from Plant organ culture
Secondary metabolite from  Plant organ cultureSecondary metabolite from  Plant organ culture
Secondary metabolite from Plant organ culture
 
In vitro mutagenesis of Cymbidium La bell “Anna Belle” by γ-rays irradiation ...
In vitro mutagenesis of Cymbidium La bell “Anna Belle” by γ-rays irradiation ...In vitro mutagenesis of Cymbidium La bell “Anna Belle” by γ-rays irradiation ...
In vitro mutagenesis of Cymbidium La bell “Anna Belle” by γ-rays irradiation ...
 
SA-Tomato
SA-TomatoSA-Tomato
SA-Tomato
 
Sub1559
Sub1559Sub1559
Sub1559
 
COMPARATIVE STUDY OF CAPSAICIN FROM IN VITRO CULTIVATED AND NATURALLY CULTIVA...
COMPARATIVE STUDY OF CAPSAICIN FROM IN VITRO CULTIVATED AND NATURALLY CULTIVA...COMPARATIVE STUDY OF CAPSAICIN FROM IN VITRO CULTIVATED AND NATURALLY CULTIVA...
COMPARATIVE STUDY OF CAPSAICIN FROM IN VITRO CULTIVATED AND NATURALLY CULTIVA...
 
Assessment of genetic fidelity of in vitro propagated clones of Celastrus pan...
Assessment of genetic fidelity of in vitro propagated clones of Celastrus pan...Assessment of genetic fidelity of in vitro propagated clones of Celastrus pan...
Assessment of genetic fidelity of in vitro propagated clones of Celastrus pan...
 
Ecklonia Maxima Extract Effect in Tissue Regeneration of Symbionts at in Vivo...
Ecklonia Maxima Extract Effect in Tissue Regeneration of Symbionts at in Vivo...Ecklonia Maxima Extract Effect in Tissue Regeneration of Symbionts at in Vivo...
Ecklonia Maxima Extract Effect in Tissue Regeneration of Symbionts at in Vivo...
 
In Vitro Shoot Regeneration and Rooting of Piper Longum L.: A valuable Medici...
In Vitro Shoot Regeneration and Rooting of Piper Longum L.: A valuable Medici...In Vitro Shoot Regeneration and Rooting of Piper Longum L.: A valuable Medici...
In Vitro Shoot Regeneration and Rooting of Piper Longum L.: A valuable Medici...
 
B04602007011
B04602007011B04602007011
B04602007011
 
Allelopathic Effect of Aqueous Extracts of Parthenium (Parthenium Hysterophor...
Allelopathic Effect of Aqueous Extracts of Parthenium (Parthenium Hysterophor...Allelopathic Effect of Aqueous Extracts of Parthenium (Parthenium Hysterophor...
Allelopathic Effect of Aqueous Extracts of Parthenium (Parthenium Hysterophor...
 
Phylotype Analysis of Ralstonia Solanacearum Causing Bacterial wilt in Eggpla...
Phylotype Analysis of Ralstonia Solanacearum Causing Bacterial wilt in Eggpla...Phylotype Analysis of Ralstonia Solanacearum Causing Bacterial wilt in Eggpla...
Phylotype Analysis of Ralstonia Solanacearum Causing Bacterial wilt in Eggpla...
 
Cytoprotective and DNA Protective Activity of Carica Papaya Leaf Extracts
Cytoprotective and DNA Protective Activity of Carica Papaya Leaf ExtractsCytoprotective and DNA Protective Activity of Carica Papaya Leaf Extracts
Cytoprotective and DNA Protective Activity of Carica Papaya Leaf Extracts
 
Cytoprotective and DNA Protective Activity of Carica Papaya Leaf Extracts
Cytoprotective and DNA Protective Activity of Carica Papaya Leaf ExtractsCytoprotective and DNA Protective Activity of Carica Papaya Leaf Extracts
Cytoprotective and DNA Protective Activity of Carica Papaya Leaf Extracts
 
Cytoprotective and DNA Protective Activity of Carica Papaya Leaf Extracts
Cytoprotective and DNA Protective Activity of Carica Papaya Leaf ExtractsCytoprotective and DNA Protective Activity of Carica Papaya Leaf Extracts
Cytoprotective and DNA Protective Activity of Carica Papaya Leaf Extracts
 
tissue culture of strawberry
tissue culture of strawberry tissue culture of strawberry
tissue culture of strawberry
 
Detection of Genetic variation in tissue culture clones of date palm using IS...
Detection of Genetic variation in tissue culture clones of date palm using IS...Detection of Genetic variation in tissue culture clones of date palm using IS...
Detection of Genetic variation in tissue culture clones of date palm using IS...
 
Study the anticancer effect of lepidium sativum leaves extract
Study the anticancer effect of lepidium sativum leaves extractStudy the anticancer effect of lepidium sativum leaves extract
Study the anticancer effect of lepidium sativum leaves extract
 
Micropropagation of large_cardamom_amomu (1)
Micropropagation of large_cardamom_amomu (1)Micropropagation of large_cardamom_amomu (1)
Micropropagation of large_cardamom_amomu (1)
 
C0703011015
C0703011015C0703011015
C0703011015
 
Micropropagation in fruit crops
Micropropagation in fruit cropsMicropropagation in fruit crops
Micropropagation in fruit crops
 

Final articlefinal 2 Zina Senin and Robin

  • 1. Indol 3- Acidic Acid (IAA) and Kinetin Influnce on Root Border Cells Production Zina Al-Saffar; Senin Ermisilia and Robin Vervoorn AVANS University of Applied Science – ATGM department-Breda Abstract Root border cells are metabolically active cells that are released from a plant root tip into the rhizosphere. Root border cells are recently used as a source to quantify genotype and phenotype. The aim of this study was to stimulate and enhance root border cells production for cucumber, lettuce and tomato using kinetin and indole-3 acidic acid (IAA) as stimulus. The seeds were challenged with 4 different concentrations of kinetin and IAA (0.01 µM, 0.1 µM, 1 µM and 10 µM), control seeds were germinated using tap water. Following germination, seeds with emerged roots were examined for root border cells production and border cells were counted using a light- microscope. DNA from harvested cells was extracted and further used for PCR assay. Results showed that IAA and kinetin stimulated the three crops under study to increase border cells production. The cucumber had higher root border cells production at 0.1 µM for both IAA and kinetin hormones, the tomato seeds showed increase in border cells number at 10 µM kinetin and the lettuce showed increase at 0.01µM for kinetin and 10 µM for IAA. No single hormone concentration or exact hormone type that caused the increase was able to be determined as the three crops responded differently to the different hormone concentrations and for the both two hormones. Adult plant from seeds germinated in IAA and kinetin showed different root grew and development, plant grew in IAA showed long, smooth root with branched root were is plant grew in kinetin showed dwarfed, rough root with no branch root formation. The polymerized chain reaction amplified fragments on agarose gel were within the expected sizes. Lettuce showed fragments with a size of (+/-250 bp) and (+/- 350 bp) for tomato. Introduction Root border cells are metabolically active cells that are released from a plant root tip into the rhizosphere [1] .Root border cells provide a biotic boundary between the rhizosphere and the root which is fundamental for the rhizosphere modification [2]. The function of the root border cells is to provide environmental protection for the growing root tip by regulating the balance of the pathogenic - and beneficial microorganisms and excessive minerals in the rhizosphere. [1] [2] The root tip is essential to the plants survival. [3] Within the root tip is the root apical meristem region (RAM). From the RAM
  • 2. region all the primary root tissue and the root cap are derived. The RAM consists of cells that are actively engaged in division, growth and differentiation. [4]. The production of border cells appear to be regulated, but little is known about this process. Border cell production is thought to be a continuous by- product of constitutive turnover of the root cap [5], but recent studies reported that border cell separation is not necessarily continuous but can be turned on and off by the plant by controlled endogenous and environmental signals and can also be induced experimentally [6] [7]. A research conducted on pea (Pisum sativum) showed that a high concentration of carbon dioxide admitted in the soil atmosphere can override endogenous signals that regulate the amount of root border cells that are being released by the plant into the rhizosphere. [8] Auxin and cytokinin are both plant hormones that stimulate plant growth. Auxin plays an important role in coordinating plant development signals and root cap [9] [10]. Indole-3 acidic acid (IAA) which is one of the forms of auxin that is responsible for the root system architecture and various stage of root development. Cytokinin stimulates cytokinesis (cell division). A study revealed that cytokinin deficiency reduces root meristem size and activity. Many studies clearly suggest that cytokinin affects the RAM [11] [12] [13] [14]. Additionally, auxin and cytokinin opposed interaction plays an important role in controlling the root meristem development. This interaction is regulated through certain integrators that regulate auxin and cytokinin metabolisms and signaling pathway to determine a specific developmental output in the root meristem. Recently, interests in using border cells as a tool in plant studies have been increased because of their low cost and simplicity of obtaining required materials. In addition border cells can be obtained from a single plant and within relatively short time. Expression of transferred genes in border cells can also be studied as they are differentiated cells and they can be easily adapted to a wide range of biochemical, physiological and molecular biological assays [15]. The objective of this study which was carried out at AVANS university of applied science – Breda and supported by Rijk Zwaan – Fijnaart, was to find a method to increase the production of root border cells either by changing environmental conditions or by changing endogenous signalling. Here, IAA and kinetin will be tested to study their role to influence the root tip Ram tissue to increase border cells production. The plants that were challenged were cucumber (Cucumis sativus), lettuce (Lactuca sativa) and tomato (Solanum lycopersicum). Additionally, auxin and cytokinin opposed interaction plays an important role in controlling the root meristem development. This interaction is regulated through certain integrators that regulate auxin and cytokinin metabolisms and signaling pathway to determine a specific developmental output in the root meristem. Materials and methods Seeds Sterilization and Germination The three types of seeds used in this research, cucumber, tomato and lettuce, were kindly delivered by Rijk Zwaan. The first step in the research was to germinate the seeds. The tomato seeds were surface sterilized in 0.5% NaOCl (Sigma Aldrich) for 45 minutes . Seeds then were rinsed in sterilized distilled water six times before germination. A stock solution with a concentration of (10 mM) was used to prepare the four concentrations of
  • 3. Indole-3-acetic acid (IAA) hormone (Sigma Aldrich) and Kinetin (Sigma Aldrich). IAA was dissolved in 1ml of 0.1 % DMSO (Emplura), kinetin was dissolved with 1ml of 1M of NaOH (Sigma Aldrich, Netherlands). These solutions were brought up to final volume of 10ml with PBS. The following concentrations were prepared from the previously prepared stock solutions (0.01; 0.1; 1 and 10 µM) and used for seeds treatment. The control seeds were germinated in tap water. All the seeds were germinated in eco-tubes (Thermo Fisher). The cucumber seeds were germinated in 100 µl solution. The lettuce and tomato seeds were germinated in 30 µl solution. The cucumber and the tomato seeds were incubated at 26oC (Ika KS 4000 I). The lettuce seeds were incubated at room temperature 20°C. Once root emerged, seeds were checked for border cells production. Border Cells Counting All seeds with root length between (0.5 - 2 mm) were collected, washed with 100µl PBS, vortexed for 1min and border cells were harvested by centrifugation for 10min at 1300 rpm (Eppendorf) . The pellet containing border cells was dissolved with 30µl PBS and samples from each treatment were pooled together and border cells were counted with Bürker-Türk counting chamber slide (Marienfeld), the number of border cells counted was calculated by the mean number of cells per plant by dividing the number of cells counted by the number of seeds were the border cells were harvested from. The solution containing the remains of cells were then stored at -20o C to extract DNA. DNA extraction The DNA from the previously harvested border cells was extracted using Extract-N-Amp kit (Sigma Aldrich). Leaves from an adult plant of crop under the study were used as a positive control. An adjustable volume of the extraction buffer was added to volume of the border cells solution and the leaf sample. The sample was then vortexed briefly for 1min and further incubated at 95°C in a water bath for 30min. After incubation, an equal volume of the dilution solution was added, briefly mixed and samples were then stored at -20o C to be used for PCR assay. DNA Purification Before the DNA was used for PCR, the DNA was purified by adding an equal volume of Phenol-Chloroform-isoamylalcohol (Sigma Aldrich) to the extracted DNA solutions. Afterwards, the solutions were vortexed and centrifuged for 2 minutes at 14000 rpm. A 350 µl of the supernatant was transferred to a clean 1.5 ml tube and 1 ml of 100% ethanol was added to the supernatant, vortexed briefly and incubated at -20°C for 10 minutes. Then the solution was centrifuged for 20 minutes at 14000 rpm and 500 µl of 70% ethanol was added to the pellet. The mixture was vortexed and centrifuged for 5 minutes at 14000 rpm. The pellet was dried by incubating at 40°C. In the final step, 50 µl of milliQ was added to the pellet to dissolve the precipitated DNA. PCR and Gel Electrophoresis The PCR reaction was carried out for the previously extracted DNA of the harvested border cells. For 20 µl PCR product, 1 µl of each specific crop primer was added to 4 µl
  • 4. DNA template, 4 µl PCR level water and 10 µl of Extract-N-Amp PCR Ready Mix (Sigma Aldrich). The PCR program was set for: Initial denaturation at 94°C for three minutes, regular denaturation at 94°C for 1 minute, annealing at 52°C (lettuce), 58°C ( tomato) and 55°C (cucumber) for 1 minute, extension at 72°C for 1 minute and final extension at 72°C for 10 minutes. The amplified fragments were visualized on 1% agarose gel. [16] Results and Discussion Effect of Altered IAA and Kinetin Hormone Concentrations on Germination, Root Growth and Border Cell Number Germination and Root Growth Cucumber, Tomato and Lettuce The effects of IAA and Kinetin on root growth and cells differentiation can be seen in Fig. 1. In the IAA treatment the germinated seeds showed long, smooth root grew with visible lateral branched roots, while in Kinetin treatment, germinated seeds showed rough, dwarf roots grew with no lateral roots formation. Antagonistic effects of IAA and kinetin similarly control the growth and the outgrowth of branches in root. The high localized Auxin concentration in the quiescent center of the root tip meristematic cells is responsible to maintain stem cells population, cell elongation and outgrowth initiation of the lateral roots. Whereas; just above the meristem, in the transition zone, cytokinin (Kinetin) represses auxin movement from the tip and auxin action thus represses cell elongation and lateral roots initiation [17]. In another word, the distance of the lateral root initiation from the root tip is regulated by Cytokinin concentration. The high Cytokinin concentration at the root cap represses IAA action and inhibits lateral root initiation in the surrounding area of the tip, which is crucial for enabling uninterrupted elongation zone, thus ensuring the elongation of smooth primary root tip free from lateral roots. Above the elongation zone, where concentrations of Cytokinin decrease, lateral roots can initiate [18]. These hormonal mechanism roles for both IAA and Kinetin on root growth can explain the different root shapes of our challenged seeds. The germination of seeds in presence of Kinetin hormone inhibited the Auxin action which is necessary for root elongation and lateral branched root initiation. Border Cell number Cucumber After 24h germination in eco tubes containing 30µl of the different hormone concentrations, seeds with root length between (0.5 -1 mm) were washed and the harvested border cells were counted. The highest production of the border cells was observed when seeds were germinated in 0.1 µM for both IAA and kinetin hormone. The Figure 1. Effects of IAA and Kinetin hormones on root growth and development. Cucumber seeds germinated in 0.1 uM Kinetin (upper plant) and 0.1uM IAA (lower plant) for 7 days at 26 o C.
  • 5. number of border cells was (32000 cell/ml/plant) and (9800 cell/ml/plant) respectively, compared with (5750 cell/ml/plant) from seeds grown in tap water (control), (Figure 2). No border cells were counted when root length exceeded 2.5 cm. Tomato Tomato seeds were germinated for 7 days in eco tubes with 30µl of different kinetin and IAA concentrations. In each treatment, border cells were harvested pooled together and counted. The root length ranged between (0.5 – 2 mm), the highest number of border cells (7500 cell/ml/plant) was observed when seeds were grown in (10 µM) Kinetin compared with (3500 cell/ml/plant) of seeds grown in tap water (Figure 3). No border cells were able to be harvested from seeds challenged with different IAA concentration as the roots length were still too short to produce border cells at the time of cell counting. Additionally, no difference in seeds germination was observed, when seeds were either sterilized or not sterilized (results not shown). Though, sterilization of the seeds helped to avoid sample contamination that usually accompanied with long incubation time. Lettuce When lettuce seeds were grown in different IAA and Kinetin concentrations until root is (0.5 - 1 mm) long. Roots were washed and border cells from each treatment harvested, pooled together and counted. Seeds challenged with (1.0 µM) IAA and (0.01 µM) Kinetin showed increase in border cells production. The counted border cell number was 13750 cell/ml/plant compared with 7500 cell/ml/plant from control seeds. No border cells were harvested when seeds grown in 10 µM of IAA and Kinetin hormones, (Figure 4). Figure 3. Different effects of Kinetin hormone on Border cells production for Tomato seeds. Tomato seeds germinated in different Kinetin concentrations for 7days, Seeds from each treatment with root length between (0.5-2mm) were washed with PBS pooled together and counted using counting chamber. Seeds challenged with IAA and Kinetin hormones showed increase in border cells production compared with seeds grown in tap water. Crops responded differently to the tested hormones, as each crop influenced by Figure 2. Effect of different IAA and Kinetin concentration on border cells production for cucumber seeds. Seeds germinated in 30µl of different IAA and Kinetin hormones for 7 days at 26 o C. Border cells from seeds with root length of (0.5-1mm) of each treatment were harvested pooled together and counted using counting chamber.
  • 6. different hormone type and different hormone concentration, as no single hormone type or certain hormone concentration caused the increase in border cells production. Plant regulates border cells release during growth and development and in response to different environmental effects [18]. Auxin and IAA are shown to increase ethylene production in root tip [17]. This increase is shown to induce the release of border cells from the root tip [19]. The release of cells from the root tip into the surrounding will stimulate the root tip to produce new set of border cells as their accumulation on the root tip ceases the border cells meristem to produce new cells [20] [16]. The quantitative increase in border cells number indicate an important role for IAA and Kinetin phytohormones on border cells production, a hypothesis that requires future work to validate it. Border Cells as Simple Research Tool for PCR Assay The harvested cells from the above experiments were used as resource for genomic and biotechnological studies. DNA was extracted from the harvested Border cells of (tomato, lettuce and cucumber) and further used for PCR assay. A specific 350-bp fragment of T26 for tomato crop was polymerase chain reaction amplified using primer 1 (5’ - GGCTTCTACTTGTGCAGTTTCG-3 ’ ) and primer 2 (3’ - GCTTGACAGGATCAAAATTGG-5’ ), (Figure 5). 250-bp fragment of R17a for Lettuce was amplified using primer 1 (5’ - GTCGCAATCAACACAACGG-3’ ) and primer 2 (3’ - GTGAACTTAGGTGCAAATAAGAAAG-5’), (Figure 6). All amplified fragments were within the expected size. The presence of band in the negative control for Lettuce indicates the contamination of the sample with plant material. The PCR amplified products of the cucumber border cells showed nonspecific bands with large size on agarose gel (results not shown). Figure 4. Different effects of IAA and Kinetin hormones on Border cell production for Lettuce seeds. Seeds germinated in different IAA and kinetin hormones for 4 days. Border cells from seeds with root length (0.5-1mm) were harvested, pooled together and counted using counting champers. Figure 5. Amplified fragment of T26 in tomato. Lane 1: mole marker III; lane 2: 0.01µM kin; lane 3: 0.1µM kin; lane 4: 1µM kin; lane 5: 10µM kin; lane 6 tab water; lane 7 (+) control leaf DNA; lane 8: (-) control; lane 9: mole marker VII.
  • 7. Border cells have multiple biological functions in enhancing root growth, defending plant root from all kinds of dangers and regulating populations of soil borne microflora in the rizosphere. Hence, genes expressed by border cells can be used for the controlled delivery of chemicals into the root tip region where water and nutrient uptake, gravity sensing as well as infection by pathogens and symbionts is initiated [21] [22]. Recent studies have reported that border cells share similar functional roles in defense to those of mammalian white blood cells in which a “trap” consisting of extracellular DNA (exDNA) and antimicrobial proteins function in immune responses to microbial pathogens [20] [21]. Border cells traps bacteria and fungi in a host- microbe specific manner by producing a complex of exDNA and antimicrobial proteins, a defense mechanism that is similar to that found in neutrophil cells [23] [24]. By other studies it was proposed that root cap functions in a manner similar to that of mammalian brain stem and that of bone marrow in its capacity to control programmed movement in response to specific pathogens environmental or signals [21]. A better understanding of border cell genes controlling this process may yield new insights into factors underlying root- rhizosphere community structure and its role in crop production [25]. Moreover, in many plant root studies determining the number of the released border cells is required. Using the traditional quantitative methods, border cells counting can be expensive and time consuming especially when there are several numbers of plants under study or when the cells sample is contaminated. Thus, looking for alternative method that is time efficient and less expensive is required. Using specific primer design for a gene or sequence that is expressed constitutively in root border cells (i.e. Brd13) [26] along with qPCR can be used as an economic method for quantifying single species cell number [27]. Statistic Border cell numbers represent the mean number of seedlings used. Variation measurement within the same group was not calculated because the samples from each treatment were pool together and counted. Conclusions Both IAA and Kinetin increased border cells production in all the three tested crops. No specific hormone concentration was able to be determined as plants responded differently to different hormone concentrations and different hormone type. Figure 6. Amplified fragment of R17a in Lettuce. Lane 1: Mole Marker III; lane 2: 10µM IAA; lane 3: 1µM IAA; lane 4: 0.1µM IAA; lane 5: 0.01µM IAA; lane 6: 10 µM kinetin; lane 7: 1µM kinetin; lane 8: 0.1µM kinetin; lane 9: 0.01µM kinetin; lane 10: (+) control; lane 11: tab water; lane 12: (-) control; lane 13: mole marker VII.
  • 8. Sterilization of the seeds before germination did not affect root grow or border cells production, but it helped to reduce sample contamination. DNA extracted from border cells can be used to study genes expressed in root tip or other biotechnological analysis. In our study, we were not able to use the thickness of bands formed on agarose gel to calculate the number of border cells used to extract DNA, as the sample contained traces of root and plant pieces. Thus it was not possible to make sure that the extracted DNA represent border cells only. Recommendation Differences in germination rate within the same set of seeds were one of the problems we encountered. Thus, germinating more seeds for each experiment can help to select a group of seeds within a close root length. A recent study [26], reported that brd13 gene is expressed constitutively in border cells. Thus, using specific primers sequences for Brd13 along with qPCR assay can be used as a new method to count border cells [27]. We also recommend to test the effect of another interesting enzyme (Pectin Methyl Esterase PME) on Border cells production as previous studies showed that it help to release border cells from the root tip and increase their production [17] [4] [19]. Acknowledgment We sincerely thank Dr. Robert Sijbrandi for his scientific comments and guidance, Dr. Jojanneke Welzen and Paul de Graag from Rijk Zwaan for their warming helps. Bibliography [1] B. Plancot and C. e. a. Santaella, “NCBI,” Plant Physiol, Deciphering the Responses of Root Border-Like Cells of Arabidopsis and Flax to Pathogen-Derived Elicitors, 2013. [2] B. S. Watson and M. F. Bedair, “Integrated Metabolomics and Transcriptomics Reveal Enhanced Specialized Metabolism in Medicago truncatula Root Border Cells,” PLant Physiol, 2015. [3] M. C. Hawes, U. Gunawardena, S. Miyasaka and X. Zhao, “The role of root border in plant cells defence,” Tends n plant science, 2000. [4] L. HAMAMOTO, M. C. HAWES and T. L. ROST, “The Production and Release of Living Root Cap Border Cells is a Function of Root Apical Meristem Type in Dicotyledonous Angiosperm Plants,” Annals of botany, 2006. [5] L. Lowes, “Origin of the Epidermis in Root Meristems,” New Phytol, vol. 127, pp. 335-347, 1994. [6] M. C. Hawes, U. Gunawardena and S. Miyasaka, “The role of root border cells in plant defense,” TRENDS IN PLANT SCIENCE, APRIL (2000). [7] X. Zhao, M. J. Iraj and M. C. Hawes, “Stimulation of Border Cell Production in Response to Increased Carbon Dioxide Level,” Plant Physiology, vol. Vol 122, p. 181–188, January 2000. [8] X. Zhao, I. J. Misaghi and M. C. Hawes*, “Stimulation of Border Cell Production in Response to,” Plant Physiology, Tucson,
  • 9. Arizona 85721, 2000. [9] P. Overvoorde, H. Fukaki and T. Beeckman, “Auxin Control of Root Development,” Cold Spring Harbor Perspect Biology, 2010. [10] S. Saini, I. Sharma, N. Kaur and K. Pati, “Auxin: a master regulator in plant root development,” Plant Cell Rep, vol. 32, p. 741–757, 2013. [11] S. Ying-Hua, Y.-B. Liu and X.-S. Zhang, “Auxin–Cytokinin Interaction Regulates Meristem Development,” Molecular Plant, vol. 4, p. 616–625, 2011. [12] F. Skoog and C. O. Miller, “Chemical regulation of growth and organ formation in plant tissues cultured in vitro,” Symp Soc Exp Biol, vol. 54, p. 118–30, 1957. [13] T. Werner, V. Motyka, V. Laucou, R. Smets, H. Van Onckelen and T. Schmulling, “Cytokinin-deficient transgenic Arabidopsis plants show multiple developmental alterations indicating opposite functions of cytokinins in the regulation of shoot and root meristem active,” Plant Cell, vol. 15, p. 2532–50, 2003. [14] K. Miyawaki, M. Matsumoto-Kitano and T. Kakimoto, “Expression of cytokinin biosynthetic isopentenyltransferase genes in Arabidopsis: tissue specificity and regulation by auxin, cytokinin, and nitrate,” Plant J, vol. 37, p. 128–38, 2004. [15] D. W. Galbriath, H. J. Bohnert and D. P. Bourque, “Root Border Cells as Tools in Plant Cells Studies,” in Methods in Plant Cell Biology, Arizona , 1995, pp. 377-387. [16] C. H. Martha and H.-J. Lin, “Correlation of Pectolytic Enzyme Activity with the Programmed Release of Cells from Root Caps of Pea (Pisum sativum),” Plant Physiol, vol. 94, pp. 1855-1859, 1990. [17] P. GEORGINA, W. B. PETER, J. F. LEWIS and I. C. GLADYS, “Auxin and ethylene interactions control mitotic activity of the quiescent centre, root cap size, and pattern of cap cell differentiation in maize,” Plant, Cell and Enviroment , vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 719 - 732, 2005. [18] H. C. Martha and H.-J. Lin, “ Correlation of Pectolytic Enzyme Activity with the Programmed Release of Cells from Root Caps of Pea (Pisum sativum),” Plant Physiol, vol. 94, pp. 1855-1859, 1990. [19] Y. Fuchs and M. Lieberman, “Effects of Kinetin, IAA, and Gibberellin on Ethylene Production, and Their Interactions in Growth of Seedlings,” Plant Physiol, vol. 43, pp. 2029-2036, 1968. [20] P. Cooper, L. Palmer and I. Chapple, “Neutrophil extracellular traps as a new paradigm in innate immunity,” Periodontol , vol. 2000 , no. 63, p. 165– 197, 2013. [21] M. E, “Neutrophil extracellular traps: a strategic tactic to defeat pathogens with potential consequences for the host,” J Innate Immun , vol. 1, p. 176–179, 2009. [22] J. Pan, M. ZHU, H. Peng and L. Wang, “Developmental Regulation and Biological functions of Root Border Cells in High Plants,” Acta Botanica Sinica, vol. 44 (1), pp. 1-8, 2002. [23] F. Wen, G. White, Z. Xiong, H. VanEtten and M. Hawes, “Extracellular DNA is required for root tip resistance to fungal infection,” Plant Physiol , vol. 151, p. 820–
  • 10. 829, 2009 . [24] F. Wen, H. Woo, E. Pierson, T. Elduset, C. Fossdal, N. Nagy and M. Hawes, “Synchronous elicitation of development in root caps induces transient gene expression changes common to legume and gymnosperm species,” Plant Mol Biol Rep , vol. 27, p. 58–68, 2009. [25] M. Hawes, G. Curlango-Rivera, Z. Xiong and J. Kessler, “Roles of root border cells in plant defense and regulation of rhizosphere microbial populations by extracellular DNA trapping,” Plant Soil, vol. 355, p. 1–16, 2012. [26] W. Fushi, A. B. Lindy, C.-R. Gilberto, X. Zhongguo and C. H. Martha, “ Altered growth and root tip morphology in Pisum sativum L. in response to altered expression of a gene expressed in border cells,” Plant Soil, vol. 377, p. 179–187, 2014. [27] H. Ruijie, Z. X. Junjie, Y. Frank and G. Richard L., “PCR-Based Multiple Species Cell Counting for In Vitro Mixed Culture,” Plos One , pp. 1-13, 2015.