SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 24
Download to read offline
Nacionalinė mokėjimo agentūra
prie Žemės ūkio ministerijos
Blindžių g. 17, LT-08111 Vilnius, Lietuva
Tel. 8~5 252 6999, faks. 8~5 252 6945,
el. paštas: info@nma.lt, www.nma.lt
Experiences and results from the
measurements in a forest
Vygintas Dūda
National Paying Agency of Lithuania
Content of the presentation
• Legal substantiation;
• Purposes of measurements;
• Preparation for measurements;
• Problems that rose up during the measurement
process;
• Reference area configuration
• Comparison of reference area, measured area and
area after post-processing;
• Results of the measurements before post-
processing;
• Results of the measurements after post-processing;
• Results and suggestions.
Legal substantiation (1)
• COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1975/2006
Article 15 - Elements on the on-the-spot checks
and determination of areas
However, for the measurements set out in Article 36(b)
(iii), (iv) and (v) of Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005, the Member
States may define appropriate tolerances, which shall in no case
be greater than twice the tolerances set down in Article 30(1) of
Regulation (EC) No 796/2004, that is not bigger than 3 meters.
• COUNCIL REGULATION (EC) No 1698/2005.
Article 36(b) – measures targeting the sustainable
use of forestry land through
(iii) first afforestation of non-agricultural land;
(iv) Natura 2000 payments;
(v) forest-environment payments;
Legal substantiation (2)
• Area measurement validation scheme JRC
IPSC/G03/P/SKA/asi D(2007)(8307)
• Our requirement for farmers to have clear claimed
area boundaries
• To get ready for measurements in a forest;
• Set down available GPS receivers that can
measure in a forest;
There is no question related to measurements in a
forest with Trimble GeoXT, Leica GS20 and Mobile Mapper
Pro. Only ProMark 3 GPS receiver worked properly;
• To set down a suitable tolerance;
• To estimate and set down the method of the
measurements:
Decision to measure points instead of the whole
perimeter continuously, because the area boundaries are
not clear. Continuously we couldn’t measure like in a field,
because in a forest can grow trees on a boundaries;
Time stood on each point: 1, 3 and 5 minutes
4 days for measurements
4 repetitions for each area and for 1, 3 and 5 minutes
sets.
Purposes of measurements
• Find out reference area;
• Set down reference area;
Two reference areas were set with Nikon NPL-522
total station: 2.084 ha and 0.637 ha;
• Measurements was continue from 12 till 15 of
March 2008;
• Measurements was done with GPS receiver
ProMark 3;
• Weather was cloudy, but without rain.
Preparation for measurements (1)
Preparation for measurements (2)
Technical parameters of ProMark 3
• S/N ratio – unknown because of limited version of
ProMark 3;
• PDOP mask - 0;
• Elevation mask – 10 degrees;
• The distance to the base station used in post-
processing – 7 kilometers.
Problems that rose up during the
measurement process
• Not all GPS receivers can view minimal quantity
of satellites in a forest that are needed for
measurements;
• Changeable and big PDOP value;
• Low number of viewable satellites;
• Multipath appearance in a forest;
• GPS signal obstruction;
• Real time kinematic function doesn’t work
properly in a forest.
Reference area configuration (1)
Reference area configuration (2)
Comparison of reference area,
measured area and area after post-
processing (1)
Comparison of the 0,637 ha measured area standing
on each point for a 1 minute
0,000
0,200
0,400
0,600
0,800
1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15
Quantity of measured fields
Measuredarea,ha
Reference
area, ha (measured
with Nikon NPL-522
total station)
Measured
area, ha (with
ProMark3)
Measured
area, ha
(after post-processing)
Comparison of the 0,637 ha measured area standing on each
point for a 3 minutes
0,000
0,200
0,400
0,600
0,800
1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15
Quantity of measured fields
Measuredarea,ha
Reference
area, ha (measured
with Nikon NPL-522
total station)
Measured
area, ha (with
ProMark3)
Measured
area, ha
(after post-
processing)
Comparison of reference area,
measured area and area after post-
processing (2)
Comparison of the 0,637 ha measured area standing on each
point for a 5 minutes
0,000
0,200
0,400
0,600
0,800
1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15
Quantity of measured fields
Measuredarea,ha
Reference
area, ha (measured
with Nikon NPL-522
total station)
Measured
area, ha (with
ProMark3)
Measured
area, ha
(after post-processing)
Comparison of reference area,
measured area and area after post-
processing (3)
Comparison of the 2,084 ha measured area standing on
each point for a 1 minute
0,000
0,500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15
Quantity of measured fields
Measuredarea,ha
Reference
area, ha (measured
with Nikon NPL-522
total station)
Measured
area, ha (with
ProMark3)
Measured
area, ha
(after post-
processing)
Comparison of reference area,
measured area and area after post-
processing (4)
Comparison of the 2,084 ha measured area standing on each
point for a 3 minutes
0,000
0,500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15
Quantity of measured fields
Measuredarea,ha
Reference
area, ha (measured
with Nikon NPL-522
total station)
Measured
area, ha (with
ProMark3)
Measured
area, ha
(after post-
processing)
Comparison of reference area,
measured area and area after post-
processing (5)
Comparison of reference area,
measured area and area after post-
processing (6)
Comparison of the 2,084 ha measured area standing on each
point for a 5 minutes
0,000
0,500
1,000
1,500
2,000
2,500
1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15
Quantity of measured fields
Measuredarea,ha
Reference
area, ha (measured
with Nikon NPL-522
total station)
Measured
area, ha (with
ProMark3)
Measured
area, ha
(after post-processing)
Results of the measurements
before post-processing (1)
AREA Perimeter
6370 363,32
3.84m RMSE of mean error (approximation of RSD-R)
10.79m 95% confidence buffer (approximation of Limit -R)
2.23m RMSE of mean error (approximation of RSD-R)
6.28m 95% confidence buffer (approximation of Limit -R)
0.70m RMSE of mean error (approximation of RSD-R)
1.97m 95% confidence buffer (approximation of Limit -R)
Time spent on each point: 1 minute
Time spent on each point: 3 minutes
Time spent on each point: 5 minutes
This value is the 1-sigma
(67% confidence) buffer
This value is the 1-sigma
(67% confidence) buffer
This value is the 1-sigma
(67% confidence) buffer
Results of the measurements before
post-processing (2)
AREA Perimeter
20840 651,17
5.73m RMSE of mean error (approximation of RSD-R)
16.09m 95% confidence buffer (approximation of Limit -R)
1,11m RMSE of mean error (approximation of RSD-R)
3,12m 95% confidence buffer (approximation of Limit -R)
1,02m RMSE of mean error (approximation of RSD-R)
2.87m 95% confidence buffer (approximation of Limit -R)
Time spent on each point: 1 minute
Time spent on each point: 3 minutes
Time spent on each point: 5 minutes
This value is the 1-sigma
(67% confidence) buffer
This value is the 1-sigma
(67% confidence) buffer
This value is the 1-sigma
(67% confidence) buffer
Results of the measurements
after post-processing (1)
AREA Perimeter
6370 363,32
7.23m RMSE of mean error (approximation of RSD-R)
20.32m 95% confidence buffer (approximation of Limit -R)
5.30m RMSE of mean error (approximation of RSD-R)
14.89m 95% confidence buffer (approximation of Limit -R)
3.48m RMSE of mean error (approximation of RSD-R)
9.78m 95% confidence buffer (approximation of Limit -R)
Time spent on each point: 1 minute
Time spent on each point: 3 minutes
Time spent on each point: 5 minutes
This value is the 1-sigma
(67% confidence) buffer
This value is the 1-sigma
(67% confidence) buffer
This value is the 1-sigma
(67% confidence) buffer
Results of the measurements
after post-processing (2)
AREA Perimeter
20840 651,17
9.69m RMSE of mean error (approximation of RSD-R)
27.22m 95% confidence buffer (approximation of Limit -R)
3.39m RMSE of mean error (approximation of RSD-R)
9.53m 95% confidence buffer (approximation of Limit -R)
2.53m RMSE of mean error (approximation of RSD-R)
7.10m 95% confidence buffer (approximation of Limit -R)
Time spent on each point: 1 minute
Time spent on each point: 3 minutes
Time spent on each point: 5 minutes
This value is the 1-sigma
(67% confidence) buffer
This value is the 1-sigma
(67% confidence) buffer
This value is the 1-sigma
(67% confidence) buffer
Results and suggestions (1)
• 3 meters perimeter buffer tolerance should be used for
measurements in a forest;
• Only measurements standing on each point for 5 minutes
are suitable in a forest;
• Results after post-processing pull off from reference area
more than results without post-processing. Post-processing
is not useful for measurements in forested areas;
• GPS receivers should be tested before starting to use them
for measurements in a forest;
• The measured areas with ProMark 3 are constantly smaller
than reference;
Results and suggestions (2)
• Area boundaries should be marked or restricted with
natural subjects (ditch, water, way, etc.) and known by the
applicant. On the other hand, it would be impossible for the
inspector to find boundaries;
• The problem is that for 2.084 ha area 95% confidence
buffer is 2.87 m and reproducibility limit is 2.28 m. It’s
significant bias – about 2%;
• We are still looking for the final answer.
Thank you for your attention
“Those who think that technology of Global Positioning System got ahead its
maturity show their boundaries of knowledge or fantasy. We still have to go
a long way.”
Dr. Javad Ashajee
Professional Surveyor

More Related Content

Similar to Measuring forest areas with GPS

Brosur Total Station Leica TS03 - Indosurta Group
Brosur Total Station Leica TS03 - Indosurta GroupBrosur Total Station Leica TS03 - Indosurta Group
Brosur Total Station Leica TS03 - Indosurta GroupIndosurta Group
 
New generation of high sensitivity airborne potassium magnetometers
New generation of high sensitivity airborne potassium magnetometersNew generation of high sensitivity airborne potassium magnetometers
New generation of high sensitivity airborne potassium magnetometersGem Systems
 
Earth Viewing Infrared Space System Sensor
Earth Viewing Infrared Space System SensorEarth Viewing Infrared Space System Sensor
Earth Viewing Infrared Space System SensorM. Faisal Halim
 
4. lecture 3 data capturing techniques - total station and gps
4. lecture 3   data capturing techniques - total station and gps4. lecture 3   data capturing techniques - total station and gps
4. lecture 3 data capturing techniques - total station and gpsFenTaHun6
 
4. lecture 3 data capturing techniques - total station and gps
4. lecture 3   data capturing techniques - total station and gps4. lecture 3   data capturing techniques - total station and gps
4. lecture 3 data capturing techniques - total station and gpsFenTaHun6
 
Backscatter Working Group Software Inter-comparison Project Requesting and Co...
Backscatter Working Group Software Inter-comparison ProjectRequesting and Co...Backscatter Working Group Software Inter-comparison ProjectRequesting and Co...
Backscatter Working Group Software Inter-comparison Project Requesting and Co...Giuseppe Masetti
 
WaPOR version 3 - H Pelgrum - eLeaf - 05 May 2023.pdf
WaPOR version 3 - H Pelgrum - eLeaf - 05 May 2023.pdfWaPOR version 3 - H Pelgrum - eLeaf - 05 May 2023.pdf
WaPOR version 3 - H Pelgrum - eLeaf - 05 May 2023.pdfWaPOR
 
Unit III GPS Receivers and Errors
Unit III GPS Receivers and ErrorsUnit III GPS Receivers and Errors
Unit III GPS Receivers and ErrorsGVNSK Sravya
 
Lps16 scagliola interf_cal
Lps16 scagliola interf_calLps16 scagliola interf_cal
Lps16 scagliola interf_calmichelescagliola
 
Seismic refractionsurveying r4a
Seismic refractionsurveying r4aSeismic refractionsurveying r4a
Seismic refractionsurveying r4aAlina Arshad
 
Seismic Refraction Surveying
Seismic Refraction SurveyingSeismic Refraction Surveying
Seismic Refraction SurveyingAli Osman Öncel
 
Rectangular ring shaped Dielectric Resonator Antenna for Dual and Wideband Fr...
Rectangular ring shaped Dielectric Resonator Antenna for Dual and Wideband Fr...Rectangular ring shaped Dielectric Resonator Antenna for Dual and Wideband Fr...
Rectangular ring shaped Dielectric Resonator Antenna for Dual and Wideband Fr...Pranav Chauhan
 
West Med Seismic Survey Project Report - June 2009
West Med Seismic Survey Project Report - June 2009 West Med Seismic Survey Project Report - June 2009
West Med Seismic Survey Project Report - June 2009 Victoria Oil and Gas Plc
 
GAS@IGARSS2011.ppt
GAS@IGARSS2011.pptGAS@IGARSS2011.ppt
GAS@IGARSS2011.pptgrssieee
 
Measurement Procedures for Design and Enforcement of Harm Claim Thresholds
Measurement Procedures for Design and Enforcement of Harm Claim ThresholdsMeasurement Procedures for Design and Enforcement of Harm Claim Thresholds
Measurement Procedures for Design and Enforcement of Harm Claim ThresholdsPierre de Vries
 
NASA Fundamental of FSO.pdf
NASA Fundamental of FSO.pdfNASA Fundamental of FSO.pdf
NASA Fundamental of FSO.pdfzoohir
 
2018 SGRT Community Meeting Atlanta
2018 SGRT Community Meeting Atlanta 2018 SGRT Community Meeting Atlanta
2018 SGRT Community Meeting Atlanta SGRT Community
 

Similar to Measuring forest areas with GPS (20)

Brosur Total Station Leica TS03 - Indosurta Group
Brosur Total Station Leica TS03 - Indosurta GroupBrosur Total Station Leica TS03 - Indosurta Group
Brosur Total Station Leica TS03 - Indosurta Group
 
New generation of high sensitivity airborne potassium magnetometers
New generation of high sensitivity airborne potassium magnetometersNew generation of high sensitivity airborne potassium magnetometers
New generation of high sensitivity airborne potassium magnetometers
 
Earth Viewing Infrared Space System Sensor
Earth Viewing Infrared Space System SensorEarth Viewing Infrared Space System Sensor
Earth Viewing Infrared Space System Sensor
 
4. lecture 3 data capturing techniques - total station and gps
4. lecture 3   data capturing techniques - total station and gps4. lecture 3   data capturing techniques - total station and gps
4. lecture 3 data capturing techniques - total station and gps
 
4. lecture 3 data capturing techniques - total station and gps
4. lecture 3   data capturing techniques - total station and gps4. lecture 3   data capturing techniques - total station and gps
4. lecture 3 data capturing techniques - total station and gps
 
Backscatter Working Group Software Inter-comparison Project Requesting and Co...
Backscatter Working Group Software Inter-comparison ProjectRequesting and Co...Backscatter Working Group Software Inter-comparison ProjectRequesting and Co...
Backscatter Working Group Software Inter-comparison Project Requesting and Co...
 
WaPOR version 3 - H Pelgrum - eLeaf - 05 May 2023.pdf
WaPOR version 3 - H Pelgrum - eLeaf - 05 May 2023.pdfWaPOR version 3 - H Pelgrum - eLeaf - 05 May 2023.pdf
WaPOR version 3 - H Pelgrum - eLeaf - 05 May 2023.pdf
 
Unit III GPS Receivers and Errors
Unit III GPS Receivers and ErrorsUnit III GPS Receivers and Errors
Unit III GPS Receivers and Errors
 
Lps16 scagliola interf_cal
Lps16 scagliola interf_calLps16 scagliola interf_cal
Lps16 scagliola interf_cal
 
Seismic refractionsurveying r4a
Seismic refractionsurveying r4aSeismic refractionsurveying r4a
Seismic refractionsurveying r4a
 
Seismic Refraction Surveying
Seismic Refraction SurveyingSeismic Refraction Surveying
Seismic Refraction Surveying
 
Rectangular ring shaped Dielectric Resonator Antenna for Dual and Wideband Fr...
Rectangular ring shaped Dielectric Resonator Antenna for Dual and Wideband Fr...Rectangular ring shaped Dielectric Resonator Antenna for Dual and Wideband Fr...
Rectangular ring shaped Dielectric Resonator Antenna for Dual and Wideband Fr...
 
West Med Seismic Survey Project Report - June 2009
West Med Seismic Survey Project Report - June 2009 West Med Seismic Survey Project Report - June 2009
West Med Seismic Survey Project Report - June 2009
 
GAS@IGARSS2011.ppt
GAS@IGARSS2011.pptGAS@IGARSS2011.ppt
GAS@IGARSS2011.ppt
 
Leica Flexline TS03 Totatl Station
Leica Flexline TS03 Totatl StationLeica Flexline TS03 Totatl Station
Leica Flexline TS03 Totatl Station
 
Measurement Procedures for Design and Enforcement of Harm Claim Thresholds
Measurement Procedures for Design and Enforcement of Harm Claim ThresholdsMeasurement Procedures for Design and Enforcement of Harm Claim Thresholds
Measurement Procedures for Design and Enforcement of Harm Claim Thresholds
 
Thesis Overview
Thesis Overview Thesis Overview
Thesis Overview
 
NASA Fundamental of FSO.pdf
NASA Fundamental of FSO.pdfNASA Fundamental of FSO.pdf
NASA Fundamental of FSO.pdf
 
Gts 255 n
Gts 255 nGts 255 n
Gts 255 n
 
2018 SGRT Community Meeting Atlanta
2018 SGRT Community Meeting Atlanta 2018 SGRT Community Meeting Atlanta
2018 SGRT Community Meeting Atlanta
 

Measuring forest areas with GPS

  • 1. Nacionalinė mokėjimo agentūra prie Žemės ūkio ministerijos Blindžių g. 17, LT-08111 Vilnius, Lietuva Tel. 8~5 252 6999, faks. 8~5 252 6945, el. paštas: info@nma.lt, www.nma.lt Experiences and results from the measurements in a forest Vygintas Dūda National Paying Agency of Lithuania
  • 2. Content of the presentation • Legal substantiation; • Purposes of measurements; • Preparation for measurements; • Problems that rose up during the measurement process; • Reference area configuration • Comparison of reference area, measured area and area after post-processing; • Results of the measurements before post- processing; • Results of the measurements after post-processing; • Results and suggestions.
  • 3. Legal substantiation (1) • COMMISSION REGULATION (EC) No 1975/2006 Article 15 - Elements on the on-the-spot checks and determination of areas However, for the measurements set out in Article 36(b) (iii), (iv) and (v) of Regulation (EC) No 1698/2005, the Member States may define appropriate tolerances, which shall in no case be greater than twice the tolerances set down in Article 30(1) of Regulation (EC) No 796/2004, that is not bigger than 3 meters. • COUNCIL REGULATION (EC) No 1698/2005. Article 36(b) – measures targeting the sustainable use of forestry land through (iii) first afforestation of non-agricultural land; (iv) Natura 2000 payments; (v) forest-environment payments;
  • 4. Legal substantiation (2) • Area measurement validation scheme JRC IPSC/G03/P/SKA/asi D(2007)(8307) • Our requirement for farmers to have clear claimed area boundaries
  • 5. • To get ready for measurements in a forest; • Set down available GPS receivers that can measure in a forest; There is no question related to measurements in a forest with Trimble GeoXT, Leica GS20 and Mobile Mapper Pro. Only ProMark 3 GPS receiver worked properly; • To set down a suitable tolerance; • To estimate and set down the method of the measurements: Decision to measure points instead of the whole perimeter continuously, because the area boundaries are not clear. Continuously we couldn’t measure like in a field, because in a forest can grow trees on a boundaries; Time stood on each point: 1, 3 and 5 minutes 4 days for measurements 4 repetitions for each area and for 1, 3 and 5 minutes sets. Purposes of measurements
  • 6. • Find out reference area; • Set down reference area; Two reference areas were set with Nikon NPL-522 total station: 2.084 ha and 0.637 ha; • Measurements was continue from 12 till 15 of March 2008; • Measurements was done with GPS receiver ProMark 3; • Weather was cloudy, but without rain. Preparation for measurements (1)
  • 8. Technical parameters of ProMark 3 • S/N ratio – unknown because of limited version of ProMark 3; • PDOP mask - 0; • Elevation mask – 10 degrees; • The distance to the base station used in post- processing – 7 kilometers.
  • 9. Problems that rose up during the measurement process • Not all GPS receivers can view minimal quantity of satellites in a forest that are needed for measurements; • Changeable and big PDOP value; • Low number of viewable satellites; • Multipath appearance in a forest; • GPS signal obstruction; • Real time kinematic function doesn’t work properly in a forest.
  • 12. Comparison of reference area, measured area and area after post- processing (1) Comparison of the 0,637 ha measured area standing on each point for a 1 minute 0,000 0,200 0,400 0,600 0,800 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 Quantity of measured fields Measuredarea,ha Reference area, ha (measured with Nikon NPL-522 total station) Measured area, ha (with ProMark3) Measured area, ha (after post-processing)
  • 13. Comparison of the 0,637 ha measured area standing on each point for a 3 minutes 0,000 0,200 0,400 0,600 0,800 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 Quantity of measured fields Measuredarea,ha Reference area, ha (measured with Nikon NPL-522 total station) Measured area, ha (with ProMark3) Measured area, ha (after post- processing) Comparison of reference area, measured area and area after post- processing (2)
  • 14. Comparison of the 0,637 ha measured area standing on each point for a 5 minutes 0,000 0,200 0,400 0,600 0,800 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 Quantity of measured fields Measuredarea,ha Reference area, ha (measured with Nikon NPL-522 total station) Measured area, ha (with ProMark3) Measured area, ha (after post-processing) Comparison of reference area, measured area and area after post- processing (3)
  • 15. Comparison of the 2,084 ha measured area standing on each point for a 1 minute 0,000 0,500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 Quantity of measured fields Measuredarea,ha Reference area, ha (measured with Nikon NPL-522 total station) Measured area, ha (with ProMark3) Measured area, ha (after post- processing) Comparison of reference area, measured area and area after post- processing (4)
  • 16. Comparison of the 2,084 ha measured area standing on each point for a 3 minutes 0,000 0,500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 Quantity of measured fields Measuredarea,ha Reference area, ha (measured with Nikon NPL-522 total station) Measured area, ha (with ProMark3) Measured area, ha (after post- processing) Comparison of reference area, measured area and area after post- processing (5)
  • 17. Comparison of reference area, measured area and area after post- processing (6) Comparison of the 2,084 ha measured area standing on each point for a 5 minutes 0,000 0,500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 1 3 5 7 9 11 13 15 Quantity of measured fields Measuredarea,ha Reference area, ha (measured with Nikon NPL-522 total station) Measured area, ha (with ProMark3) Measured area, ha (after post-processing)
  • 18. Results of the measurements before post-processing (1) AREA Perimeter 6370 363,32 3.84m RMSE of mean error (approximation of RSD-R) 10.79m 95% confidence buffer (approximation of Limit -R) 2.23m RMSE of mean error (approximation of RSD-R) 6.28m 95% confidence buffer (approximation of Limit -R) 0.70m RMSE of mean error (approximation of RSD-R) 1.97m 95% confidence buffer (approximation of Limit -R) Time spent on each point: 1 minute Time spent on each point: 3 minutes Time spent on each point: 5 minutes This value is the 1-sigma (67% confidence) buffer This value is the 1-sigma (67% confidence) buffer This value is the 1-sigma (67% confidence) buffer
  • 19. Results of the measurements before post-processing (2) AREA Perimeter 20840 651,17 5.73m RMSE of mean error (approximation of RSD-R) 16.09m 95% confidence buffer (approximation of Limit -R) 1,11m RMSE of mean error (approximation of RSD-R) 3,12m 95% confidence buffer (approximation of Limit -R) 1,02m RMSE of mean error (approximation of RSD-R) 2.87m 95% confidence buffer (approximation of Limit -R) Time spent on each point: 1 minute Time spent on each point: 3 minutes Time spent on each point: 5 minutes This value is the 1-sigma (67% confidence) buffer This value is the 1-sigma (67% confidence) buffer This value is the 1-sigma (67% confidence) buffer
  • 20. Results of the measurements after post-processing (1) AREA Perimeter 6370 363,32 7.23m RMSE of mean error (approximation of RSD-R) 20.32m 95% confidence buffer (approximation of Limit -R) 5.30m RMSE of mean error (approximation of RSD-R) 14.89m 95% confidence buffer (approximation of Limit -R) 3.48m RMSE of mean error (approximation of RSD-R) 9.78m 95% confidence buffer (approximation of Limit -R) Time spent on each point: 1 minute Time spent on each point: 3 minutes Time spent on each point: 5 minutes This value is the 1-sigma (67% confidence) buffer This value is the 1-sigma (67% confidence) buffer This value is the 1-sigma (67% confidence) buffer
  • 21. Results of the measurements after post-processing (2) AREA Perimeter 20840 651,17 9.69m RMSE of mean error (approximation of RSD-R) 27.22m 95% confidence buffer (approximation of Limit -R) 3.39m RMSE of mean error (approximation of RSD-R) 9.53m 95% confidence buffer (approximation of Limit -R) 2.53m RMSE of mean error (approximation of RSD-R) 7.10m 95% confidence buffer (approximation of Limit -R) Time spent on each point: 1 minute Time spent on each point: 3 minutes Time spent on each point: 5 minutes This value is the 1-sigma (67% confidence) buffer This value is the 1-sigma (67% confidence) buffer This value is the 1-sigma (67% confidence) buffer
  • 22. Results and suggestions (1) • 3 meters perimeter buffer tolerance should be used for measurements in a forest; • Only measurements standing on each point for 5 minutes are suitable in a forest; • Results after post-processing pull off from reference area more than results without post-processing. Post-processing is not useful for measurements in forested areas; • GPS receivers should be tested before starting to use them for measurements in a forest; • The measured areas with ProMark 3 are constantly smaller than reference;
  • 23. Results and suggestions (2) • Area boundaries should be marked or restricted with natural subjects (ditch, water, way, etc.) and known by the applicant. On the other hand, it would be impossible for the inspector to find boundaries; • The problem is that for 2.084 ha area 95% confidence buffer is 2.87 m and reproducibility limit is 2.28 m. It’s significant bias – about 2%; • We are still looking for the final answer.
  • 24. Thank you for your attention “Those who think that technology of Global Positioning System got ahead its maturity show their boundaries of knowledge or fantasy. We still have to go a long way.” Dr. Javad Ashajee Professional Surveyor