2. SCHEME OF PRESENTATION
1. Introduction
2. Classification and diagnostic criteria
3. Neurobiology
4. Treatment modalities of OCD
5. Brain stimulation methods
6. Surgical treatment of OCD
7. Conclusion
8. Take home message
3. Introduction
Definition:
Obsessions are defined by (1 ) and (2):
– 1 . Recurrent and persistent thoughts, urges,
or images that are experienced, at some time
during the disturbance, as intrusive and
unwanted, and that in most individuals cause
marked anxiety or distress.
– 2 . The individual attempts to ignore or
suppress such thoughts, urges, or images, or to
neutralize them with some other thought or
action (i .e., by performing a compulsion).
4. Compulsions are defined by (1 ) and (2):
– 1 . Repetitive behaviors (e.g., hand washing,
ordering, checking) or mental acts (e.g., praying,
counting, repeating words silently) that the
individual feels driven to perform in response to an
obsession or according to rules that must be applied
rigidly.
– 2 . The behaviors or mental acts are aimed at
preventing or reducing anxiety or distress, or
preventing some dreaded event or situation;
however, these behaviors or mental acts are not
connected in a realistic way with what they are
designed to neutralize or prevent, or are clearly
excessive
5. OCD – CLINICAL DETAILS
OCD the fourth most common psychiatric diagnosis after
phobias, substance-related disorders, and major depressive
disorder.
LIFE TIME PREVALENCE 2-3%
AGE – 10-24 YRS (83%), average 20 yrs; > 35 YEARS (15%)
SEX- WOMEN (52%) > MEN
ADOLESCENT: BOYS (70%) m/c
CO MORBIDITY – DEPRESSION (67%)
TIC DISORDER (5-10%)
SP PHOBIAS (25%)
SOCIAL PHOBIA (18%)
PANIC DISORDERS (12%)
6. Course
Typically chronic, waxing and waning course.
20 to 30 % of patients: significant improvement
40 to 50 % : moderate improvement
20 to 40 % : either remain ill or their symptoms
worsen.
7. Classification
The classification of OCD is intriguing.
OCD was a part of anxiety disorders not very long
ago.
Now it gained an independent identity both in DSM
and ICD.
In DSM 5th edition the major change for OCD is a
fact that it and related disorders have their own
chapters and no longer considered as anxiety
disorders. As the same ICD 11 also.
8. Obsessive-Compulsive and Related
Disorders in DSM 5 and ICD 11
DSM 5 ICD 11
1. OCD
2. BODY DYSMORPHIC
DISORDER
3. HOARDING DISORDER
4. TRICHOTILLOMANIA
5. EXCORIATION
6. BODY FOCUSED
REPETITIVE BEHAVIOUR
7. OBSESSIONAL JELOUSY
1. OCD
2. BODY DYSMORPHIC
DISORDER
3. HOARDING DISORDER
4. OLFACTORY REFERENCE
DISORDER
5. HYPOCHONDRIASIS
6. BODY FOCUSED
REPETITIVE BEHAVIOUR
1. TRICHOTILLOMANIA
2. EXCORIATION
12. Normal intrusions
Less frequent
Brief
Less resistance
Less unacceptable
Considered irrelevant
Less concern with
control
Less emphasis on
neutralizing
Less interference
Obsessions
More frequent
Time consuming
Strong resistance
More unacceptable
Highly ego-dystonic
Heightened concern
with thought control
Strong focus on
neutralizing distress
Significant interference
13. Core features of compulsions
Repetitive, stereotypic, and intentional
Subjective urge to perform
Diminished sense of voluntary control
Prevention or reduction of distress or a dreaded
consequence
Considered exaggerated/excessive
14. M/C Obsessive-Compulsive Symptoms in
Adults
OBSESSIONS
– Contamination
– Pathological doubt
– Somatic
– Need for symmetry
– Aggressive
– Sexual
– hoarding
COMPULSIONS
– Checking
– Washing
– Counting
– Need to ask or confess
– Symmetry and precision
– Hoarding
15. Neurobiology of OCD
BRAIN Abnormalities.
– Abnormalities in fronto striatal circuits (CSTC) and
fronto sub cortical circuits.
BRAIN imaging studies
– Structural brain imaging
Decreased grey matter in
Dorsomedial prefrontal cortex
Anterior cingulate cortex
Inferior frontal gyrus
Anterior Insula
Absence of age related change in
Putamen
Insula
OFC
– Functional brain-imaging studies-
– positron emission tomography (PET}-have shown
increased activity (e.g., metabolism and blood flow) in
the frontal lobes, the basal ganglia (especially the
caudate ), and the cingulum of patients with OCD.
16. Magnetic resonance spectrosocpy
Decreased NAA in ACC and caudate
Decreased Glutamate
Increased GLX
NEUROIMMUNOLOGY
– Group A beta-hemolytic streptococcal infection can
cause rheumatic fever, and approximately 1 0 to 30
percent of the patients develop Sydenham's chorea and
show obsessive-compulsive symptoms.
Neurotransmitters .
Role of neurotransmitters in OCD
– Serotonin:
– Evidence do not support a primary pathogenic role of serotonin
– Probably modulate networks or regions that are dysfunctional in OCD.
– Dopamine
• Dysregulated dopamine function
– Neuropeptides
• Elevation of stress mediating neuropeptides –
• AVP/CRH/OXYTOCIN
– Glutamate
19. PSYCHOTHERAPY
Cognitive - Behavioral therapy
– Exposure and response prevention (EX/RP)
– Desensitization,
– thought stopping,
– flooding,
– implosion therapy, and
– aversive conditioning
20. Recent developments
Pharmacological augmentation therapies
Anti psychotics:- Risperidone
aripiprazole
Glutamatergic agents:-Memantine
N –acetyl cysteine
Topiramate
Lamotrigine
Ketamine
Riluzole
Serotinergic agents:- Ondonsetron, granisetran
Novel psychotherapies:
Acceptance and commitment therapy
Mindfulness based cognitive therapy
Dialectical behavioural therapy
Meta cognitive therapy
21. Somatic therapies
(Brain stimulation strategies)
Electrical Stimulation of brain
Non invasive:
Trans cranial
Invasive:surgical
Intra cranial Preipheral
VNS
DEEPSUPERFICIAL
DBSCORTICAL
STIMULATION
DIRECT:
ELECTRICAL
INDIRECT:
MAGNATIC
CONVUL
SIVE
CONVUL
SIVE
NON- CO
NVULSIVE
NON-CO
NVULSIVE
ECT MST TMSCES
TES
TDCS
22. Neuromodulation therapies/ Brain stimulation
methods
There is an increasing interest in the utilization of several
neuromodulation therapies (NTs) in the management of
psychiatric patients
Psychopharmacological therapy exposes the entire body to a
potentially therapeutic substance in order to treat a relatively
small region of the brain
NTs are designed to target specific brain circuits that are
important in the pathogenesis of psychiatric disorder
NTs are not systemic and, therefore, the side-effect profile is
limited and different from medications, and there are
minimal, if any, drug interactions
Data has been emerging continuously about FDA-approved
and yet-to-be-approved NTs in the psychiatric population
over the past decade
23. Neuromodulation therapies
An electrically stimulated cell will primarily produce a
restricted range of responses inherent to its functionality
Brain stimulation modulates the system’s endogenous
responsiveness and presumably, when delivered appropriately,
allows it to recruit adaptive strategies
Long term potentiation (LTP) or long term depression (LTD)
can alter synaptic plasticity and learning
24. Therapeutic Neuromodulation: Treating
Psychiatric Disorders Through Brain
Stimulation
Mechanism of Action
Electrical Stimulation—Common Pathway
– The brain stimulation modalities just reviewed generate
either electrical or magnetic pulses.
– However, both of these share a common final pathway—
they affect the neurons electrically.
That electrical effect may either be through the direct
application of electricity or through the indirect induction of
electricity via magnetic stimulation.
– The direct forms of electrical stimulation are exemplified in
either transcranial delivery, as with ECT, CES, and tDCS,
or intracerebral delivery, as in the case of DBS or direct
cortical stimulation (epidural or subdural).
– The indirect forms of electrical stimulation include TMS
and MST, which induce electrical fields in the brain
through the application of alternating magnetic fields.
25. Of note, both the epidural and intracerebral modalities are more
focal than the transcranial application of electricity because
electrodes are placed directly in the neuronal tissue, bypassing
the impedance of the scalp and skull.
The relatively more contemporary magnetic stimulation methods
(TMS and MST) also bypass the impedance of the scalp and skull
and are thus likewise more focal.
Magnetic stimulation is working on principle of Faraday law and
maxwell equation.
The magnetic modalities achieve their enhanced focality
noninvasively, in contrast to the intracerebral and epidural
methods, and are thus at the center of intensive research in that
they offer a promise of an unparalleled degree of spatial
specificity without the need for surgery.
26. Comparison of Brain Stimulation with
Psychopharmacology
Brain stimulation Psycopharmacolgy
Therapeutic agent Electrical (or
electromagnetic)
Neurochemical
Temporal characteristics Phasic Tonic
Delivery Automated or clinician
administered
Dependent on patient
compliance
Site of action Axonal depolarization Molecular target
Distribution Focally applied to the brain Systemic
Duration of availability Milliseconds to seconds Typical half-life of hours to
weeks
Dosing parameters Intensity, frequency,
intertrain interval, number
of pulses, site of stimulation
Milligrams, blood level
Metabolism None Hepatic
Clearance None Renal
Interactions with
metabolism of other
agents
None known Possible
27. Acute and Prolonged Mechanisms of Action
• Phasic activation of neural circuit.
• Observable motor responses (e.g., twitch)
• Temporary disruption (e.g., speech arrest) or
facilitation of ongoing processing (e.g.,
speeds reaction time
Acute
effects
• Neuroplasticity
• Change in synaptic efficacy, akin to long-
term potentiation or depression
• Alterations in neurotropic factors
• Modulation of cortical excitability
• Modulation of functional connectivity
Prolong
ed
effects
28.
29. Role of Deep brain stimulation
and ablative neurosurgeries in
OCD
30. Need for alternate interventions in
OCD
• Response to standard treatments
• 40-60% of patients show inadequate response to SSRIs
• Around 50-60% of patients respond to CBT
• Around 30% of patients respond to antipsychotic
augmentation
Pallanti et al, 2002, Eddy et al, 2004, Dold, 2013
• 10-20% of patients are refractory to standard pharmacotherapy
and psychotherapy
Aouizerate et al., 2006; Denys et al, 2006
• Indication for invasive treatments – severe, chronic, disabling
and treatment refractory illness.
31. Surgery for psychiatric disorders
• Prefrontal lobotomy for psychiatric disorders
• Early to mid 20th century – marked personality changes*
• Fell into disrepute due to indiscriminate use and with
advent of other effective non-invasive treatments
vs
• Contemporary neurosurgical procedures -
• Advances in image guidance, & stereotactic procedures
• Gamma-knife surgery and Deep Brain Stimulation
• Advances in theoretical understanding
• Careful selection of patients
32. Rationale for surgery in OCD
• Earlier rationale – based on outdated theories
and serendipitous observations
• Techniques & targets improvised based on
experience – “learning curve”
• Effective targets lie on the CSTC circuits
• ACC, capsule, striatum and ventral striatum
• Similar to SSRIs & CBT, surgical techniques
decrease hyperactive fronto-striatal circuits
– Figee et al, 2013; Greenberg et al; 2010; Nakao et al, 2014
33. Selection criteria for surgery
1. Severe (YBOCS >25-30) and chronic unremitting OCD
2. Causing substantial distress and impairment in
functioning (GAF ≤50), a poor quality of life.
3. The following treatment options tried systematically
without appreciable effect on the symptoms
• 2 adequate SSRI trials for 3 months each
• Clomipramine trial for 3 months, unless poorly tolerated
• 2 augmentation trials, one of them being an atypical antipsychotic:
Risperidone/aripiprazole, clomipramine, memantine, ondansetron/granisetron
• 1 CBT trial (at least 20 ERP sessions) or demonstrated inability to tolerate the
anxiety due to therapy
• Previous treatment trials have not been abandoned prematurely due to solely
mild side effects
• Duration of the primary illness must exceed 1 year and typically exceeds 5
years.
4. Patient gives informed consent
5. Willing to participate in the pre-operative evaluation
and post-operative periodic follow-up
Reddy et al, Clinical practice guidelines for OCD, Indian J Psychiatry, 2017
34. Relative contraindications
1. Comorbid intellectual disability, psychosis,
bipolar disorder and severe personality disorders
2. Clinically significant and unstable neurologic
illnesses.
35. Pre Surgery Work-Up
• Detailed clinical examination – to confirm diagnosis and
comorbidity
• Review of treatment history – establish refracoriness
• MRI brain, other routine pre-surgical investigations
• Neuropsychological testing
• Clearance from an independent committee – consisting of a
neurologist, neurosurgeon, and psychiatrist
• Final review by the head of the panel (independent
psychiatrist)
36. Informed consent
• Indication & rationale for surgery
• Possible benefits
• Latency of response
• Probability and extent of improvement
• Need to continue standard treatment techniques
• Adverse effects
• Alternatives
• Follow-up
• Post-surgery treatment options
44. Deep Brain stimulation
DBS has been use for treatment of movement
disorders.
Recently there has been a surge of interest in
using this device for treatment of psychiatric
disorders, especially OCD.
Although it is an invasive procedure , the risk of
operation is small, it is reversible in nature, and
the treatment can be optimized postoperatively.
45. Deep Brain stimulation, procedure
3 stages
1. Image guided insertion of electrodes (1mm)
inserted under LA
• Multiple contacts in to sub cortical nuclei(usually
4 per side)
• Intraoperative macrostimulation for monitoring
adverse effects
2. Subdermal implantation of neurostimulator
– Upper chest wall, connects it, via extension wires
tunneled under the skin, to the brain leads.
• Battery –replaceble vs rechargable
3. Programming -flexibility
• Polarity, amplitude, frequency and pulse duration
46. Mechanism
Exact mechanism of action is not known
•DBS is thought to block neural activity within the
stimulated target area, producing similar to tissue
ablation.
47. Targets in OCD
• Ventral Anterior limb of the internal capsule
• Ventral capsule/ventral striatum (VC/VS)
• Nucleus Accumbens
• Bed nucleus of stria terminalis
• Subthalamic nucleus
• Inferior thalamic peduncle
In depression
Subgenual cingulate cortex
48. Adverse effects
• Complications of the surgical intervention
• Intracerebral hemorrhage - 0.2% to 5% -? higher in STN
• Postoperative infection
• Devise related
• Lead breakage
• Devise related discomfort
• Depletion of battery – increase in anxiety & depression
• Adverse effects of the stimulation itself
• Dyskinesia, dysarthria, eyelid apraxia, gait disturbances
• Depression/suicidal ideation
• transient hypomanic symptoms,fear,panic and occational forgetfulness,
• Word findng difficulties
• Persistent – increased libido, micturition problems, cognitive deficits
49. Outcome
DBS can be considered an effective treatment
modality with few side effects.
60% response in treatment resistant OCD
FDA recently approved DBS for Rx resistant
OCD on Humanitarian Device Exemption
DBS approved for MDD also
50. Pros & Cons of DBS
Advantages
¨ Does not produce irreversible lesion
¨ Side effects may be reversible
¨ Stimulator is adjustable
¨ Sham stimulations possible
¨ Can change stimulation sites
Disadvantages
¨ High cost
¨ May have to replace batteries periodically
¨ Highly skilled interdisciplinary team with intensive and
frequent monitoring
¨ Invasive
51. Summary
• Stereotactic ablation and Deep Brain Stimulation may be tried
in carefully selected patients with treatment refractory severe
OCD
• Ablative surgery – gamma ventral capsulotomy/anterior
cingulotomy
• DBS – ventral capsule/ventral striatum & subthalamic nucleus
• Around 40-60% of patients improve 6-12 months after procedure
• Extent of improvement – variable – mean 40-60%
• Not a standalone treatment - should be considered to be one of
the treatment modalities in a comprehensive package
53. tDCS
Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) is a noninvasive
form of treatment that uses very weak (1 to 3 mA) direct electrical
current applied to the scalp.
Because direct current polarizes rather than stimulates with
discrete pulses, its action does not appear directly to result in
action potential firing in cortical neurons.
It is also this direct current (DC) form of electrical stimulation
that distinguishes it from devices that use alternating currents
(AC) as found in CES, ECT, VNS, and DBS, which produce
discrete pulse stimulation.
In addition, because tDCS works via polarization and does not
affect action potential firing in cortical neurons, the term
“transcranial direct current polarization” is favored by some
modern investigators, and both terms appear interchangeably in
the literature today.
The small device is very portable and usually operated by readily
54. History
tDCS was initially investigated in the 1960s and
has experienced a recent resurgence of interest
because of its ease of application, small device
size, low cost, and relative lack of worrisome
risks and side effects as compared with
treatments like ECT and TMS
55.
56.
57. Mechanism of Action
Direct current polarizes current, and tDCS is
believed to act via the alteration of neuronal
membrane polarization, but little is known about
the actual mechanism of action of tDCS.
Polarization may affect the firing and conductance
of neurons by either lowering or raising the
threshold of activation.
Because tDCS involves the application of low
currents to the scalp via cathodal and anodal
electrodes, depending on the direction of current
flow, polarization can either inhibit (cathodal) or
facilitate (anodal) function.
58. Transcranial direct current stimulation is a non-invasive
neuromodulatory technique that delivers low intensity, direct
current (1-2 mA) to cortical areas through application of
electrodes on the scalp facilitating or inhibiting spontaneous
neuronal activity
59. tDCS: Neurobiological Effects
•Firing rates recorded from neural populations in cats.
•Anodal stimulation results in positive shift of resting membrane
potential
•This can result in an elevated neuronal firing rate
60. tDCS: Neurobiological Effects
•Firing rates recorded from neural populations in cats.
•Cathodal stimulation - negative shift of resting membrane potential
•This can result in a decreased neuronal firing rate
62. Role of tDCS in OCD
As OCD is related to hyper activity of cortico-striato-
thalamic-cortical circuits, tDCS could potentially
alleviate OC sypmtoms by modulating activity of
orbito-frontal cortex or dorsolateral prefrontal cortex.
Till date, only a few case reports have been published
regarding the role of tDCS in OCD.
In one case cathodal stimulation over DLPFC
produced no change in OC symptoms although
anxiety and depressive symptoms improved.
In a recent report, cathodal stimulation over OFC
produced response in resistant OCD.
Another series of two cases were reported from india
where anodal stimulation over supplementary motor
area(SMA) caused improvement in SSRI resistant
OCD.
63. Side Effects
There are no known serious adverse effects of
tDCS.
It is well tolerated,
common side effects
minimal tingling at the site of stimulation,
skin irritation.
64. Current Status in Treatment
Algorithms
tDCS is not approved by the FDA for psychiatric
treatments and is thus considered an
experimental research technology with much
work needed to demonstrate its efficacy.
tDCS could represent an inexpensive and
relatively safe alternative form of treatment to
medications, prior to the more invasive
stimulation methods like ECT or VNS.
65. Future Directions
Most of the current tDCS devices use large,
saline solution–soaked electrodes.
Future device development will most likely
investigate electrode shape and contact material
to optimize the intended clinical effects and
further improve ease of use.
However, basic questions of efficacy, indications,
and dose–response relationships, as well as
predictors of response, will need to be explored
first.
67. rTMS
Definition
TMS is the application of a rapidly changing magnetic field
to the superficial layers of the cerebral cortex, which locally
induces small electric currents, also referred to as “eddy”
currents.
This induction was originally discovered by Michael
Faraday through his experiments in 1831 and later
quantified in Maxwell's equations of electromagnetism.
Thus, TMS may be referred to as electrical stimulation
without an electrode, in that it uses magnetic fields to
indirectly induce electrical pulses.
68. TMS devices deliver strong magnetic pulses via a coil
that is held on the scalp.
Because magnetic fields are unaffected by the
electrical impedance of the scalp and skull, this
method of stimulation enables the focal stimulation of
smaller areas of the brain than is possible with other
noninvasive devices that use either alternating (ECT,
CES) or direct (tDCS) electrical current for primary
stimulation.
TMS is an example of noninvasive stimulation of focal
regions of the brain and, as such, can be used for
research or therapeutically without the need for
anesthesia.
69. History
In 1985, Barker, Jalinus, and Freeston from the
University of Sheffield in the United Kingdom
reported the first use of TMS to stimulate the
human brain.
In 1996, Alvaro Pascual-Leone and colleagues
reported that TMS might have prolonged
antidepressant properties after daily stimulation
for 5 days to the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex.
1985 – Baker
1st Therapeutic reports of TMS in Mood Disorders
70. Mechanisms of Action
Based on the principle Faraday's law
– the induced electromotive force in a closed
loop is directly proportional to the time
rate of change of magnetic flux through
the loop.
– As applied in TMS, a changing magnetic
field induces an electrical current in the
circuitry of the superficial cortex
underlying the TMS coil.
– This electrical current is commonly
referred to as “eddy current” for its
circulating motion in a plane
perpendicular to the plane of the magnetic
field, and is also known as Foucault
current
– At sufficient intensity, electrical currents
will stimulate neuronal depolarization,
which can result in an action potential
71. For example, when the TMS coil is positioned
over the hand area of the cerebral cortex's motor
strip, the changing magnetic field generated by
the repetitive pulses induces local currents
immediately below the site of stimulation that
cause the neurons in area M1 to fire. In turn, this
action potential propagates through the
polysynaptic corticospinal tract and results in a
twitch in the contralateral hand muscle
73. Dosing
Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
Dosing Parameters
Scalp position, target localization method
Coil shape and orientation
Single pulse vs. repetitive vs. convulsive
Train: Frequency, duration, intensity, total
pulses
Intertrain interval
Number of trains/session
Number of sessions/day
Number of days/course
Taper/maintenance/reintroduction
74. r TMS Coils
Circular Coil
Larger and deeper magnetic field
- when neuroanatomical targets are not precise
Figure of 8 coil
stronger and more focused magnetic field
- Better spatial resolution of activation
- Penetration depth aprox 2 -3cms
H Coil
Newer type
- Multiple coil windings
- Generate greater depth of penetration (dorsal ant
Cingulate, subgenual cingulate)
75. Role of rTMS in OCD
After publicatin of the first positive results in
1997, several studies have investigated efficacy of
rTMS in OCD.
The sites for cortical stimulation for
– DLPFC
– OFC
– SMA
The results were mixed and some and some
benefit occurred on application of low frequency
rTMS over SMA and OFC though benefits seem
to disappear following discontinuation of rTMS.
rTMS approved for MDD
76. Other Therapeutic use of r TMS
Mood Disorders – Left DLPFC
Movement Disorders – Motor Cortex
Parkinson's – Motor cortex
Tourette disease – Motor cortex
Seizures – specific areas indicated by EEG
Pain – motor cortex , OFC,
somatosensory cortex
77. Side Effects, Interactions with
Medications, and Other Risks
Common side effects
– Transient headache
– Scalp discomfort
Other side effects
– Dizziness
– Facial twitching
– Hypo manic switch
Serious side effects
– Seizure (subject factors can be important, such as the
presence of a neurological disorder (epilepsy or a focal
brain lesion) or use of seizure-lowering medications.)
78. Current Status in Treatment Algorithms
TMS is not currently approved by the FDA as a
clinical treatment modality, although an
application for an indication in the treatment of
depression is being considered by this agency.
For that reason there is no specific treatment
algorithm for the use of TMS;
however, if it is approved as an effective and safe
treatment, it would most likely be considered as
an alternative treatment modality to
medications, prior to more invasive methods like
ECT.
79. Future Directions
TMS and other forms of magnetic stimulation
hold a tremendous promise in psychiatric
treatment due to their focality and
noninvasiveness.
However, much research is needed to replicate
preliminary findings, improve optimal dosing,
establish the patient characteristics that predict
response, and examine the influence of
concomitant medications on TMS effect.
80. ECT
It can be used only in cases of OCD
with comorbid severe mood
disorders.
Ect has failed to find any place in the
current rx guidelines of OCD.
81. TAKE HOME MSG
OCD is cronic debilitating psychiatric disorder.
SSRI and CBT are the first line therapies.
Brain stmulation methods and surgical methods
(Stereotactic ablation and Deep Brain Stimulation) may be
tried in carefully selected patients with
treatment refractory severe OCD.
Only DBS is approved for OCD by FDA.
ECT has limited use in OCD, Low efficacy and
more adverse effects
TMS and other forms of magnetic stimulation
hold a tremendous promise in psychiatric
treatment due to their focality and
noninvasiveness
82. References
Kaplan and sadock’s 9th edition of CTP
Kaplan and sadock’s 10TH edtion of
synopsis of psychiatry.
Indian consensus document on OCD
by IPS.
Reddy et al, Clinical practice guidelines for
OCD, Indian J Psychiatry, 2017
Editor's Notes
The lifetime prevalence for major depressive disorder in persons with OCD is about 67 percent and for social phobia about 18 percent.
20 to 30 % of patients have significant improvement in their symptoms, and 40 to 50 percent have moderate improvement. The remaining 20 to 40 percent of patients either remain ill or their symptoms worsen
ADDED SPECIFIERS
AND DELETED CRITERIA B AS At some point during the course of the disorder, the person has recognized that the obsessions or compulsions are excessive or unreasonable
NAA N acetyl l aspartate
GLX GLUTAMINE
Initial effects are generally seen after 4 to 6 weeks of treatment, although 8 to 1 6 weeks are usually needed to obtain maximal therapeutic benefit. GUIDELINES RECOMMEND CONTINUATION OF MEDICATION AT LEAST 1 -2 YEARS
The principal behavioral approaches in OCD are exposure and response prevention.
TDCS, transcranial direct current stimulation; TES, Transcranial electrical stimulation; TMS, transcranial magnetic stimulation; VNS, vagus nerve stimulation. CES : Cranial electrical stimulation
NEURO MODULATION IS THE PHYSIOLOCAL PROCESS BY WHICH A GIVEN NEURON USES ONE OR MORE CHEMIVALS TO REGULATE DIVERSE POPULATION OF NEURONS
A single electrical pulse delivered at sufficient intensity can induce depolarization, trigger an action potential, release neurotransmitters at the synapse, and result in transsynaptic propagation with subsequent activation of a functional circuit. For example, brain stimulation applied to the hand area of the primary motor cortex may activate the corticospinal tract and induce a muscle twitch in the contralateral hand
--Persistent activation of a brain circuit can induce prolonged changes in the subsequent activities of that circuit. For example, repeated stimulation of the perforant pathway at high electrical frequency induces a lasting increase in the efficacy that circuit, whereas low frequencies depress it. These phenomena are termed long-term potentiation (LTP) and long-term depression (LTD), respectively
What is the
During mid 20 th century mc performed
adverse effects included 6 percent mortality, seizures in 1 percent, and disinhibition syndromes in 1.5 percent
1.The procedure involves placement of small-diameter brain “leads” (e.g., approximately 1.3 mm) with multiple electrode contacts into subcortical nuclei or specific white matter tracts. The surgeon drills burr holes in skull bone under local anesthesia and then places the leads, guided by multimodal imaging and precise stereotactic landmarking. Usually this is done bilaterally. The subject is typically sedated but awake during surgery.
2.Later, the “pacemaker” (also known as an implantable neurostimulator or pulse generator) is implanted subdermally (e.g., in the upper chest wall) and connects it, via extension wires tunneled under the skin, to the brain leads.
3.Since various combinations of electrodes can be activated, at adjustable polarity, intensity, and frequency, DBS permits more flexible modulation of brain function, referred to as neuromodulation. Thus, parameters can be optimized for individual patients. The process of optimizing parameters for individual patients, typically performed by a specially trained psychiatrist in the outpatient setting, can be quite time-consuming and requires attentive, long-term follow-up.
4. In cases where no beneficial settings can be identified despite extensive efforts, the electrodes can be inactivated, and devices may be removed. In that event, devices are usually only partly explanted, with the brain electrodes left in place given the small risk of hemorrhage upon removal
when given one pulse at a time without regular rhythm and at low rates of delivery, is referred to as single-pulse TMS
When repeated at regular rhythmic intervals that usually range from 1 to 25 Hz, this stimulation method is described as repetitive TMS (rTMS),
which can be further functionally divided into “low-frequency rTMS” when the stimulation frequency is 1 Hz or less and “high-frequency rTMS” when higher frequencies are used, usually 5 to 20 Hz.
Theta burst stimulation (TBS) refers to high-frequency bursts (e.g., 3 pulses at 50 Hz) applied at a regular frequency (e.g., 5 bursts per second).
Each device's technical parameters, such as stimulation intensity, pulse frequency, and total number of pulses administered, are the most basic adjustable elements of TMS dosing