How the discourses about food changed in Italy through the latest decades; which are the main actors and events that affected these changes; PDo and PGI labels; new transversal market alliances.
Booking open Available Pune Call Girls Sanaswadi 6297143586 Call Hot Indian ...
Food discourses evolution. The role of food security in the evolution of food discourse in Italy
1. International conference
on the Local & Regional Food System Planning
Trade-off or convergence?
The role of food security in the
evolution of food discourse in Italy
Asan-city
September 10th, 2012
Professor Gianluca Brunori
Vanessa Malandrin, Research Fellow
University of Pisa
3.
How do people change their general
attitude to food?
Who is involved in these processes?
What strategies and tools are used to
influence consumer thinking?
4. The evolution of food discourse
3 phases in the discourse of food security
1. From II World War to end of 1980s:
modernization frame with emphasis on on
productivity and the industrial organization of
production
2. 1990s: “turn to quality” phase
3. Economic crisis and emergence of food
poverty
5. The evolution of food discourse
1960 -’90: standardization, delocalization and
gradual erosion of quality in italian food industry
Strict food safety rules: diversity (and a different
concept of quality) is sacrificed to achieve the
goal of higher hygiene standards
The “Made in Italy” brand attracted many
international corporations, which became
involved in the business of traditional products
Some examples: San Daniele ham, gorgonzola
cheese, extra-virgin olive oil
7. The “turn to quality” phase
Reg. (CEE) 2081/1992 regulation on PDO&PGI
During the 1990s quality became the base for
the identity of italian food
The generic image of the “Made in Italy” based
on images of pizza and spaghetti was replaced
More attention to regional specificities, traditional
products and artisanal production
New opportunities for farmers and small food
processing enterprises
8. The New Food Consensus
The new concept of quality became the
base for a new italian consensus on food
Food industry and corporations adopted
some aspects fo the new discourse and
contributed to its development
9.
10. Slow Food movement (1)
In 1989 Carlo Petrini and Folco Portinari
presented the Slow Food Manifesto:
We are enslaved by speed and we have
all succumbed to the same insidious virus:
Fast Life, which disrupts our habits,
pervades the privacy of our homes and
forces us to eat Fast Foods.
11. Slow Food movement (2)
1996: first “Taste Fair”, an opportunity to
show to a wide public a gastronomic
heritage in danger of extinction caused by
modernization
1999: petition “In defence of the Italian
gastronomic heritage” which was being
jeopardized by the new food safety
regulations
12.
13. Slow Food movement (3)
2001: manifesto “In defence of raw
milk cheese” to protest against the
closure of many small dairies by Health
Authorities
http://www.slowfood.com/slowcheese/
The growing success of traditional food
was mobilized to create political pressure
in order to adapt food standards
introduced by EU regulations in order to
respect local specificities
14. Slow Food movement (4)
2004: first edition of Terra Madre, a turning
point for the food movement in Italy and
probably elsewhere
It marked the shift of Slow Food from a
focus on pleasure to a focus on security
there is no contradiction between quality
and affordability, localism and
multiculturalism, safety and artisanal
quality, and security and pleasure
15. Emerging storylines
Quality is not only about safety: there is
artisanal quality opposed to industrial quality
EU standards have created a trade-off
between safety and quality; some of the
norms are too restrictive, putting in danger
hundreds of traditional local products
Industrial large scale production and artisanal
small scale production have different
characteristics; safety rules need to be
tailored to the specific features of small
producers
16. … and some positive results
1999: the Ministry of Agriculture approved
a national regulation that gave a special
dispensation of the safety rules for
traditional products
2004: the positive impacts of the Italian
system lead to EU Reg. (853/2004), which
gives to the member states the freedom to
adapt food safety rules to local
specificities
17. Farmer’s Unions
Coldiretti: gradually abandoned the
modernization discourse and corporatist
defence of CAP price support, and
proposed a new business model based on
multifunctionality and direct sell
Tradition, locality and family farming
became common elements of Coldiretti’s
concept of quality
Traceability
18.
19. New trasversal market alliances
Eataly
http://eatalyny.com/how-to-eataly
It works in partnership with Slow Food,
reconciling the best of Italian artisanal
food products with affordable prices by
reducing the food chain to the essential,
and creating a direct relationship between
producers and the retailer
20. New trasversal market alliances
McDonald’s
McItaly: sandwich made with Italian
ingredients, some of which are PDO
products
campaign in partnership with the Ministry
of Agriculture
21. Challenges for the new italian food
consensus
Food availability and affordability have
become the biggest challenges to the
Made in Italy consensus
How to keep the legitimacy of ‘artisanal
quality’ without being accused of
neglecting food security?
22. Challenges for the new italian
food consensus
Mediterranean diet & Sustainable diets
Obesity
Land planning vs soil consumption
GMOs
Organic farming
Food sovereignty
The first frame is challenged by the emergence of the organic movement and Slow Food. Then, also a series of food scandals undermined its legitimacy and marks the transition to a second phase, characterised by the ‘turn to quality’, which facilitates the development of a ‘Made in Italy food consensus’. In 1986 some low-price wine mixed with methanol killed 21 people.
The 2nd phase is based on the concept of artisanal quality (Murdoch and Miele, 1999; Tregear et al. 2007), which embodies local and organic food as components of Italian food identity. It gains consensus in the business sector thanks to its value-creation strategy that replaces the emphasis on the cost-competitiveness approach in the industry. In this phase, food security mainly concerns food safety, conservation of national food identity and the survival of family farming.
3rd phase: development of a frame that links environmental, health, agricultural and socio-economic issues, and that stimulates communication between food companies, political parties, public administrations, food movements and consumers.
Early 1970s, birth of organic farming: a radical critique of the food system and of the modernization discourse
The critique of agricultural modernization was strengthened by the foundation of Slow Food.
San Daniele ham, gorgonzola cheese, extra-virgin olive oil
The first Regulation was the substituted by Reg. (CE) n. 510/2006 ) of the European Union Counsil
Quality became also a strategic resourse to compete on the global markets, and more recently became the key for the national approach to food security
Also power games changed in this new framework, because the new definition of quality was in contrast with the industrial logic of production, based on technological innovation and brand management.
Quality starts to be considered more and more linked to local specificity - represented by traditional recipes, local biodiversity, artisanal manifacturing – and becomes more and more important in policy making
BSE outbreak in 1996. Italians discovered that modernization of the food system had not made food as safe as they expected. Given that BSE occurred in countries where modernization had happened much faster than in Italy, Italians were encouraged to acknowledge that ‘modernization’ of the food sector was not a guarantee for food safety
The slow food movement slogan is: good, clean, just (fair)
New food consensus: These campaigns involved farmers’ unions at a local level, NGOs, local administrations, and were also widely covered in the media (Brunori 2007).
The first taste fair had a big success: 8000 visitors per day
Colonnata lard, aged in cellars obtained from marble excavation in Tuscany
New food consensus: These campaigns involved farmers’ unions at a local level, NGOs, local administrations, and were also widely covered in the media (Brunori 2007).
In 2011 in Italy there were 233 PDOs and PGIs and 511 wine geographical indications. Even more impressive, 4606 ‘traditional products’ were recognized by the Ministry of Agriculture. Artisanal quality, in contrast to industrial quality, has become the key to the Italian food strategy (Ventura et al, 2006).
In 2002, it proposed a ‘pact with consumers’ centered on the quality of food and the environment. One of the keywords of the new pact was ‘traceability’, which involved consumers being informed of the origin of the product
63 markets only in tuscany
In June 2010 for several days the media published the story of ‘blue mozzarella’ found in shops in northern Italy
Coldiretti was very active in producing press releases linking food safety problems to imported food
Food risks were increasingly being associated with imported products or imported raw materials.
GMO: Slow Food movement: “... when the contamination will be done, our 'Made in Italy' will become just an empty label”
In 2007 the alliance “Free from GMOs” was established. It consists of 32 members
Although its image was related to small and traditional farming, Slow Food established partnerships with the most important Italian food companies such as Barilla, Lavazza, CoopItalia (Fonte, 2006), Ferrero, and more recently, with Federalimentare, the employers’ association of the food sector.
ensuring that civil society and subaltern publics have a voice in the public sphere.