ACROFACIAL VITILIGO DR SASI ATTILI
- Disclaimer-
This PPT is loaded as student material "as is", from the VRF Vitiligo Master Class Barcelona November 2011; VRF does not endorse or otherwise approve it.
2. - Disclaimer-
aterial "as is", from the VRF Vitiligo Master Class Barcelona November 2011; VRF does no
3.
4. • Is mucosal vitiligo part of acrofacial?
• What about anogenital lesions?
5. 1. Acrofacial/ Lip-tip vitiligo
currently considered as a limited form of generalized
vitiligo (NSV) because of symmetrical acral
involvement with facial lesions.
2. Vitiligoid lichen sclerosus (VLS)
6. Lichen Sclerosus et Atrophicus, Hemorrhagic and Vitiligoid Type. Julio M.
Borda, Luis M. Mirande, and Jorge Abulafia. Abstracted by Orlando Canizares
for Arch Dermatol. 1961; 84: 698-706
Borda JM, Balas Re. Lichen sclerosus et atrophicus of a vitiligoid type (In
Spanish). Arch Argent Dermatol 1961; 11: 419–424.
Borda JM, Abulafia J, Jaimovich L. Syndrome of circumscribed
scleroatrophies. Dermatol Iber Lat Am 1968; 3: 179–202. (In English)
Attili VR, Attili SK: Lichenoid inflammation in vitiligo: A clinical and histopathologic
review of 210 cases. Int J Dermatol 47:663-669, 2008
Attili VR, Attili SK. Vitiligoid lichen sclerosus: a reappraisal. Indian J.Dermatol.
Venereol. Leprol. 2008; 74(2):118-21.
Attili VR, Attili SK. Lichen sclerosus of lips: a clinical and histopathologic study
of 27 cases. International journal of dermatology. 2010; 49(5):520-6.
7. 1. Acrofacial/ Lip-tip vitiligo
currently considered as a limited form of generalized
vitiligo (NSV) because of symmetrical acral
involvement with facial lesions.
2. Vitiligoid lichen sclerosus (VLS)
superficial variant of lichen sclerosus- presents
as asymptomatic vitiligoid depigmentation
involving acral, facial and genital areas
i.e clinical= vitiligo, histology= LS
8. Since VLS and acrofacial vitiligo look alike
and both involve the same areas, can they
both be differentiated?
9. Attili VR, Attili SK: Lichenoid inflammation in vitiligo: A clinical and histopathologic review of 210 cases. IJD 2008
10.
11. • Aim: characterisation and differentiation of
acrofacial vitiligoid lesions
• History and a thorough clinical examination in all
patients
• A single biopsy was taken from patients with typical
macular lesions. Multiple biopsies were taken when
ever possible from patients with atypical lesions
12. • Acrofacial vitiligoid lesions were observed on
clinical examination in 54 patients.
• Genital depigmentation- associated in 26/54
patients.
13. Source & Number of LS* VLS** VL***
Biopsies reviewed
Acral (33/54) 7 8 (24%) 18
Facial (29/54) 2 17 (59%) 10
Genital (17/26) 2 13 (76%) 2
LS*- Both clinical and histological features of LS
VLS**- Clinical vitiligo with histological features of LS
VL***- No clinical or histological features of LS= vitiligo
14. Pattern Clinical LS Histological LS Potential missed diag.
Acral-Facial (28) 1(4%) 18/28 patients (64%) 10 / 28 (36%)
Acral-Facial-Genital (26) 10(38%) 23/26 patients (88%) 3 / 26 (12%)
6/26 patients (AFG) had biopsies from all three areas and 4 had LS in all the three
areas.
AF and AFG depigmentation therefore probably belong to the same spectrum with
AFG being the complete expression of the disease
15.
16.
17.
18.
19.
20.
21. • Racially restricted phenomenon?
• Casual clinical diagnosis of vitiligo. Biopsies are not
taken from atypical vitiligo lesions
Genital area is not routinely examined and patients
•
don’t complain re: genital lesions.
Most genital lesions in this series were discovered on
direct questioning and persuasive inspection
22. • Initial objective of differentiating AF vitiligo from
VLS was only successful to a limited extent
• Though individual lesions of vitiligo and VLS can
be differentiated in most cases by histo review
• a significant number of cases that do not fall into either
category
• Features of both vitiligo (symmetrical acral
depigmentation) and LS (clinical and histological features)
were observed concurrently in some patients.
23. 1. Lesions of vitiligo may have histologic changes
typical of LS (VLS)
2. Lesions typical of vitiligo both clinically and
histologically, are found in conjunction with LS
24. True association of vitiligo and LS?
• Association is not seen with the other clinical types of
vitiligo
• The clinical lesions are also atypical with punctate &
guttate depigmentation in acral distribution
Acrofacial vitiligoid lesions are early/ abortive
lesions of LS?
• Bilateral symmetry over hands and feet is not a known
feature of LS
25. • Further focused studies are needed to find out: If this is a
true association, superimposition of one over the other or a
distinct disease different from both vitiligo and LS.
• Mucosal, genital and acrofacial vitiligo are part of the same
spectrum
• Acrofacial vitiligo is probably distinct from Generalized
vitiligo with acral lesions
• shows punctate/ guttate lesions spreading in a centripetal
pattern, rarely affects the trunk and shows a high prevalence/
predisposition to LS
• ? Explains poor treatment response in acral lesions
Editor's Notes
GM. Thank you… I am Sasi Atttili and am a Dermatologist working in the UK. Over the last7 years I have been closely involved in an ongoing study on vitiligoid lesions along with my Dad who is a Dermatologist in India and I would like to share our experience of 54 very interesting cases of AF vitiligo. which to us suggests an etiology different from generalised NSV. We are presenting 54 cases of vitiligo with essentially Acrofacial and genital involvement. The clinical and histological features show a pattern that appears to be distinct from vitiligo vulgaris.
What is acrofacial vitiligoIn a good number of these cases, the genital area is also affected. These cases are currently classified as acrofacial/Lip-tip/Mucosal vitiligo. We believe ‘Acral vitiligo’ is more appropriate because the distinctive feature is that the trunk is mostly spared and progression pattern is centripetal.
Acral lesions seen in Vitiligo vulgaris appear to be different from exclusive Acral vitiligo, variously called as acrofacial, Lip-tip and mucosal vitiligo.
Current status- unclear. In NSV and diff from mucosal vitiligo
AF depigmentation is currently considered as a limited form of generalized vitiligo. In this regard, it is interesting to note that VLS, a recent rediscovery also affects acrofacial and genital areas. A biopsy can differentiate the two diseases.
LSA of vitiligoid type was first reported from Argentina by Prof. Borda et al in 3 publications but did not attract global attention and follow up. Rediscovery of VLS was an off shoot of our histopathological study of vitiligo which indicated the microinflammatory nature of the pathogenesis. During the course of this study, we have discovered one other microinflammatory disease resulting in depigmentation different from vitiligo because it had typical histological features of LS. These vitiligoid lesions were mostly seen among patients with oral/genital and acral depigmentation.
AF depigmentation is currently considered as a limited form of generalized vitiligo. In this regard, it is interesting to note that VLS, a recent rediscovery also affects acrofacial and genital areas. A biopsy can differentiate the two diseases.
Since VLS and AF vitiligo involve the same areas and look alike on clinical examination, differentiation of the two diseasescan be made only by histopathological review. Since histological information on vitiligo and VLS is recent, we need to refresh this knowledge.
Vitiligo histopathology has long been considered non-specific but, we now believe there is sufficient evidence to say that it is a microinflammatory disease of the nature of a sub-clinical lichenoid dermatitis with its known sequel of atrophy / sclerosis.
In few cases, scanty cellular infiltration at the interface resolving with insignificant dermal papillary homogenization has been observed. We believe these lesions are milder abortive forms of VLS. How ever, since these are not typical features of LS, evolving vitiligo can not be excluded beyond doubt.
Having considered the histological differentiation of VLS and vitiligo, we have reviewed clinical and histological features in 54 cases of acrofacial depigmentation.
Not all cases end up with clear LS features. Here the AFG depigmentation clinical pattern is similar to other cases, but firm clinical/ histological evidence of LS is lacking.