SlideShare a Scribd company logo
1 of 2
Technology assessment criteria of 9th grade
Criteria 1 points 2 Points 3 points 4 points 5 Points 6 Points
A: Investigate
The student states the
problem and investigates
the problem.
The student states the
problem and investigates
the problem, collecting
information from sources
and lists some
specifications.
The student describes the
problem, mentioning its
relevance and investigates
the problem, selecting and
analyzing information from
some acknowledged
sources.
The student describes the
problem, mentioning its
relevance and investigates the
problem, selecting and
analyzing information from
some acknowledged sources
and describes a test to
evaluate the product/solution
against the design
specification.
The student explainsthe
problem, discussing its
relevance and critically
investigates the problem,
evaluating information from
a broad range of
appropriate, acknowledged
sources and describes a
test to evaluate the
product/solution against the
design specification.
The student explainsthe
problem, discussing its
relevance and critically
investigates the problem,
evaluating information from a
broad range of appropriate,
acknowledged sources. The
student describes detailed
methods for appropriate testing
to evaluate the
product/solution against the
design specification.
B: Design
The student generates
one design, and makes
some attempt to justify
this against the design
specification.
The student generates a
few designs, justifying the
choice of one design and
makes some attempt to
justify this against the
design specification.
The student generates a
few designs, justifying the
choice of one design and
fully evaluating this against
the design specification.
The student generates a
range of feasible designs,
justifying the choice of one
design and justifies the chosen
design and fully evaluating
this against the design
specification.
The student generates a
range of feasible designs,
each evaluated against the
design specification and
justifies the chosen design
and evaluatesit fully and
critically against the design
specification.
The student generates a range
of feasible designs, each
evaluated against the design
specification and justifies the
chosen design and evaluates
it fully and critically against the
design specification.
C: Plan
The student produces a
plan that contains some
details of the steps and/or
the resources required.
The student produces a
plan that contains a
number of logical steps that
include resources and time.
The student produces a
plan that contains a number
of logical steps that include
resources and time, and
makes some attempt to
evaluate the plan.
The student produces a plan
that contains a number of
logical steps that describe the
use of resources and time, and
makes some attempt to
evaluate the plan.
The student produces a plan
that contains a number of
detailed, logical steps that
describe the use of
resources and time,
evaluating the plan and
justifies any modifications to
the design.
The student produces a plan
that contains a number of
detailed, logical steps that
describe the use of resources
and time. The student critically
evaluates the plan and justifies
any modifications to the
design.
Criteria 1 points 2 Points 3 points 4 points 5 Points 6 Points
D: Create
The student considers the
plan and creates at least
part of a product/solution.
The student considers the
plan and uses appropriate
techniques and equipment
to create a
product/solution.
The student uses
appropriate techniques and
equipment, and follows the
plan and mentions any
modifications made,
resulting in a
product/solution of good
quality.
The student competently
uses appropriate techniques
and equipment, and follows
the plan and justifies any
modifications made, resulting
in a product/solution of good
quality.
The student competently
uses appropriate techniques
and equipment. The student
follows the plan and justifies
any modifications made,
resulting in a product/solution
of appropriate quality using
the resources available.
The student competently
uses appropriate techniques
and equipment. The student
follows the plan and justifies
any modifications made,
resulting in a product/solution
of appropriate quality using
the resources available.
E: Evaluate
The student evaluates the
product/solution or his or
her own performance. The
student makes some
attempt to test the
product/solution.
The stude6nt evaluates the
product/solution and his or
her own performance. The
student makes some
attempt to test the
product/solution.
The student evaluates the
product/solution and his or
her own performance and
suggests ways in which
these could be improved,
testing the product/solution
to evaluate it against the
design specification.
The student evaluates the
success of the product/solution
in an objective manner based
on the results of testing,
providing an evaluation of his
or her own performance, and
provides an appropriate
evaluation of the impact of the
product/solution on life, society
and/or the environment.
The student evaluates
product/solution in an
objective manner based on
the results of testing, and the
views of the intended users,
providing an evaluation of his
or her own performance, and
suggests improvements,
providing an appropriate
evaluation of the impact of
the product/solution.
The student evaluates the
success of the
product/solution in an
objective manner based on
the results of testing, and the
views of the intended users,
providing an evaluation of his
or her own performance, and
suggests improvements,
providing an appropriate
evaluation of the impact of
the product/solution on life,
society and/or the
environment.
F: Attitudes in
Technology
The student rarely
displays a satisfactory
standard in personal
engagement (motivation,
independence, general
positive attitude) or in
team work (attitudes
towards safety,
cooperation and respect
for others).
The student occasionally
displays a satisfactory
standard in personal
engagement (motivation,
independence, general
positive attitude) or in team
work (attitudes towards
safety, cooperation and
respect for others).
The student sometimes
displays a satisfactory
standard in personal
engagement (motivation,
independence, general
positive attitude) and in
team work (attitudes
towards safety, cooperation
and respect for others).
The student frequently
displays a satisfactory
standard in personal
engagement (motivation,
independence, general
positive attitude) and in team
work (attitudes towards safety,
cooperation and respect for
others).
The student often displays a
satisfactory standard in
personal engagement
(motivation, independence,
general positive attitude) and
in team work (attitudes
towards safety, cooperation
and respect for others).
The student consistently
displays a satisfactory
standard in personal
engagement (motivation,
independence, general
positive attitude) and in team
work (attitudes towards
safety, cooperation and
respect for others).
Average:

More Related Content

What's hot

Make a difference with Evaluations
Make a difference with EvaluationsMake a difference with Evaluations
Make a difference with EvaluationsEwald Roodenrijs
 
Naming the Pain in Requirements Engineering - Design of a Global Family of Su...
Naming the Pain in Requirements Engineering - Design of a Global Family of Su...Naming the Pain in Requirements Engineering - Design of a Global Family of Su...
Naming the Pain in Requirements Engineering - Design of a Global Family of Su...Daniel Mendez
 
Ruud Teunissen - The Awful Truth About Estimation, Have I Been Wrong All Alon...
Ruud Teunissen - The Awful Truth About Estimation, Have I Been Wrong All Alon...Ruud Teunissen - The Awful Truth About Estimation, Have I Been Wrong All Alon...
Ruud Teunissen - The Awful Truth About Estimation, Have I Been Wrong All Alon...TEST Huddle
 
Penfold eleanor as cw evaluation and overall feedback sheet
Penfold eleanor as cw evaluation and overall feedback sheetPenfold eleanor as cw evaluation and overall feedback sheet
Penfold eleanor as cw evaluation and overall feedback sheetpenfolde
 
Clive Bates - A Pragmatic Approach to Improving Your Testing Process - EuroST...
Clive Bates - A Pragmatic Approach to Improving Your Testing Process - EuroST...Clive Bates - A Pragmatic Approach to Improving Your Testing Process - EuroST...
Clive Bates - A Pragmatic Approach to Improving Your Testing Process - EuroST...TEST Huddle
 
MYP Design Cycle Resource
MYP Design Cycle ResourceMYP Design Cycle Resource
MYP Design Cycle ResourceMichael Bonnick
 
Stages of test development and common test techniques (1)
Stages of test development and common test techniques (1)Stages of test development and common test techniques (1)
Stages of test development and common test techniques (1)Maury Martinez
 
Measuring the impact of instant high quality feedback.
Measuring the impact of instant high quality feedback.Measuring the impact of instant high quality feedback.
Measuring the impact of instant high quality feedback.Stephen Nutbrown
 
Introduction to unit testing
Introduction to unit testingIntroduction to unit testing
Introduction to unit testingpooja deshmukh
 
Isabel Evans - Quality In Use - EuroSTAR 2011
Isabel Evans - Quality In Use - EuroSTAR 2011Isabel Evans - Quality In Use - EuroSTAR 2011
Isabel Evans - Quality In Use - EuroSTAR 2011TEST Huddle
 
Paul Gerrard - Advancing Testing Using Axioms - EuroSTAR 2010
Paul Gerrard - Advancing Testing Using Axioms - EuroSTAR 2010Paul Gerrard - Advancing Testing Using Axioms - EuroSTAR 2010
Paul Gerrard - Advancing Testing Using Axioms - EuroSTAR 2010TEST Huddle
 
Pearson_Psych_Assessment_Platform_Marion_Buchenau
Pearson_Psych_Assessment_Platform_Marion_BuchenauPearson_Psych_Assessment_Platform_Marion_Buchenau
Pearson_Psych_Assessment_Platform_Marion_BuchenauMarion Buchenau
 
Item building 9 point Item
Item building 9 point ItemItem building 9 point Item
Item building 9 point ItemAzizi Ahmad
 

What's hot (19)

Schools of software testing
Schools of software testingSchools of software testing
Schools of software testing
 
Make a difference with Evaluations
Make a difference with EvaluationsMake a difference with Evaluations
Make a difference with Evaluations
 
EEX 501 Assessment chap 8, 9
EEX 501 Assessment  chap 8, 9EEX 501 Assessment  chap 8, 9
EEX 501 Assessment chap 8, 9
 
Naming the Pain in Requirements Engineering - Design of a Global Family of Su...
Naming the Pain in Requirements Engineering - Design of a Global Family of Su...Naming the Pain in Requirements Engineering - Design of a Global Family of Su...
Naming the Pain in Requirements Engineering - Design of a Global Family of Su...
 
Pmp sample questions set2
Pmp sample questions set2Pmp sample questions set2
Pmp sample questions set2
 
Ruud Teunissen - The Awful Truth About Estimation, Have I Been Wrong All Alon...
Ruud Teunissen - The Awful Truth About Estimation, Have I Been Wrong All Alon...Ruud Teunissen - The Awful Truth About Estimation, Have I Been Wrong All Alon...
Ruud Teunissen - The Awful Truth About Estimation, Have I Been Wrong All Alon...
 
Penfold eleanor as cw evaluation and overall feedback sheet
Penfold eleanor as cw evaluation and overall feedback sheetPenfold eleanor as cw evaluation and overall feedback sheet
Penfold eleanor as cw evaluation and overall feedback sheet
 
Clive Bates - A Pragmatic Approach to Improving Your Testing Process - EuroST...
Clive Bates - A Pragmatic Approach to Improving Your Testing Process - EuroST...Clive Bates - A Pragmatic Approach to Improving Your Testing Process - EuroST...
Clive Bates - A Pragmatic Approach to Improving Your Testing Process - EuroST...
 
McGill Workshop
McGill WorkshopMcGill Workshop
McGill Workshop
 
MYP Design Cycle Resource
MYP Design Cycle ResourceMYP Design Cycle Resource
MYP Design Cycle Resource
 
Stages of test development and common test techniques (1)
Stages of test development and common test techniques (1)Stages of test development and common test techniques (1)
Stages of test development and common test techniques (1)
 
Measuring the impact of instant high quality feedback.
Measuring the impact of instant high quality feedback.Measuring the impact of instant high quality feedback.
Measuring the impact of instant high quality feedback.
 
Introduction to unit testing
Introduction to unit testingIntroduction to unit testing
Introduction to unit testing
 
Isabel Evans - Quality In Use - EuroSTAR 2011
Isabel Evans - Quality In Use - EuroSTAR 2011Isabel Evans - Quality In Use - EuroSTAR 2011
Isabel Evans - Quality In Use - EuroSTAR 2011
 
Survey of Engineering Managers
Survey of Engineering ManagersSurvey of Engineering Managers
Survey of Engineering Managers
 
Paul Gerrard - Advancing Testing Using Axioms - EuroSTAR 2010
Paul Gerrard - Advancing Testing Using Axioms - EuroSTAR 2010Paul Gerrard - Advancing Testing Using Axioms - EuroSTAR 2010
Paul Gerrard - Advancing Testing Using Axioms - EuroSTAR 2010
 
Pearson_Psych_Assessment_Platform_Marion_Buchenau
Pearson_Psych_Assessment_Platform_Marion_BuchenauPearson_Psych_Assessment_Platform_Marion_Buchenau
Pearson_Psych_Assessment_Platform_Marion_Buchenau
 
Item building 9 point Item
Item building 9 point ItemItem building 9 point Item
Item building 9 point Item
 
ADDIE
ADDIEADDIE
ADDIE
 

Viewers also liked

Fake Huawei Email to Kyko from Prithvi Information Solutions Regarding Approv...
Fake Huawei Email to Kyko from Prithvi Information Solutions Regarding Approv...Fake Huawei Email to Kyko from Prithvi Information Solutions Regarding Approv...
Fake Huawei Email to Kyko from Prithvi Information Solutions Regarding Approv...mh37o
 
U.S. ITC Found Traded Bottom-Mount Refrigerators Imported from South Korea an...
U.S. ITC Found Traded Bottom-Mount Refrigerators Imported from South Korea an...U.S. ITC Found Traded Bottom-Mount Refrigerators Imported from South Korea an...
U.S. ITC Found Traded Bottom-Mount Refrigerators Imported from South Korea an...policefifth7
 
Kiosko y más diario sur - 23 ene 2013 - page #48
Kiosko y más   diario sur - 23 ene 2013 - page #48Kiosko y más   diario sur - 23 ene 2013 - page #48
Kiosko y más diario sur - 23 ene 2013 - page #48Universidad de Málaga
 
Apresentação kpc
Apresentação kpcApresentação kpc
Apresentação kpc19031992
 
Resolucion 2974 2014
Resolucion 2974 2014Resolucion 2974 2014
Resolucion 2974 2014neique
 
Bienvenidos
BienvenidosBienvenidos
Bienvenidosjkgg
 

Viewers also liked (7)

Fake Huawei Email to Kyko from Prithvi Information Solutions Regarding Approv...
Fake Huawei Email to Kyko from Prithvi Information Solutions Regarding Approv...Fake Huawei Email to Kyko from Prithvi Information Solutions Regarding Approv...
Fake Huawei Email to Kyko from Prithvi Information Solutions Regarding Approv...
 
U.S. ITC Found Traded Bottom-Mount Refrigerators Imported from South Korea an...
U.S. ITC Found Traded Bottom-Mount Refrigerators Imported from South Korea an...U.S. ITC Found Traded Bottom-Mount Refrigerators Imported from South Korea an...
U.S. ITC Found Traded Bottom-Mount Refrigerators Imported from South Korea an...
 
Kiosko y más diario sur - 23 ene 2013 - page #48
Kiosko y más   diario sur - 23 ene 2013 - page #48Kiosko y más   diario sur - 23 ene 2013 - page #48
Kiosko y más diario sur - 23 ene 2013 - page #48
 
Apresentação kpc
Apresentação kpcApresentação kpc
Apresentação kpc
 
Resolucion 2974 2014
Resolucion 2974 2014Resolucion 2974 2014
Resolucion 2974 2014
 
Bienvenidos
BienvenidosBienvenidos
Bienvenidos
 
Test
TestTest
Test
 

Similar to Technology assessment criteria of 9th grade03

Evaluation: Determining the Effect of the Intervention
Evaluation: Determining the Effect of the Intervention Evaluation: Determining the Effect of the Intervention
Evaluation: Determining the Effect of the Intervention Ijaz Ahmad
 
6731 wk 4
6731 wk 46731 wk 4
6731 wk 4dkawcak
 
Evaluation in Education
Evaluation in EducationEvaluation in Education
Evaluation in EducationKusum Gaur
 
Myp technology assessment critera
Myp technology assessment criteraMyp technology assessment critera
Myp technology assessment criteraaismbio
 
Assignment 2 Fink Step 3Due Week 7 and worth 200 pointsFor .docx
Assignment 2 Fink Step 3Due Week 7 and worth 200 pointsFor .docxAssignment 2 Fink Step 3Due Week 7 and worth 200 pointsFor .docx
Assignment 2 Fink Step 3Due Week 7 and worth 200 pointsFor .docxbraycarissa250
 
Assessment: Achieving improved efficiency, effectiveness, educational integri...
Assessment:Achieving improved efficiency, effectiveness, educational integri...Assessment:Achieving improved efficiency, effectiveness, educational integri...
Assessment: Achieving improved efficiency, effectiveness, educational integri...Diana Quinn
 
AGU Evaluation Impact Workshop - December 2015
AGU Evaluation Impact Workshop - December 2015AGU Evaluation Impact Workshop - December 2015
AGU Evaluation Impact Workshop - December 2015Bradford Davey
 
Assessment primer
Assessment primerAssessment primer
Assessment primerCHARMY22
 
Help faculty in Higher Education redesign courses for online learning
Help faculty in Higher Education redesign courses for online learningHelp faculty in Higher Education redesign courses for online learning
Help faculty in Higher Education redesign courses for online learningCarolina Castro Huercano
 
Designing and Conducting Formative Evaluations
Designing and Conducting Formative EvaluationsDesigning and Conducting Formative Evaluations
Designing and Conducting Formative Evaluationscloder6416
 
Assessment 072
Assessment 072Assessment 072
Assessment 072fogleman
 
Designing and conducting summative evaluations
Designing and conducting summative evaluationsDesigning and conducting summative evaluations
Designing and conducting summative evaluationsLarry Cobb
 
Coherence cas cop assess share
Coherence cas cop assess shareCoherence cas cop assess share
Coherence cas cop assess shareEdAdvance
 
Apt 501 chapter_7
Apt 501 chapter_7Apt 501 chapter_7
Apt 501 chapter_7cdjhaigler
 
Developing Assessment Instruments Chapter 7
Developing Assessment Instruments Chapter 7Developing Assessment Instruments Chapter 7
Developing Assessment Instruments Chapter 7cdjhaigler
 
Developing Assessment Instrument
Developing Assessment InstrumentDeveloping Assessment Instrument
Developing Assessment Instrumentcdjhaigler
 
Page 1 of 5 Coursework Assignment Brief Semes.docx
Page 1 of 5  Coursework Assignment Brief   Semes.docxPage 1 of 5  Coursework Assignment Brief   Semes.docx
Page 1 of 5 Coursework Assignment Brief Semes.docxalfred4lewis58146
 

Similar to Technology assessment criteria of 9th grade03 (20)

Assessment criteria
Assessment criteriaAssessment criteria
Assessment criteria
 
Assessment criteria
Assessment criteriaAssessment criteria
Assessment criteria
 
Evaluation: Determining the Effect of the Intervention
Evaluation: Determining the Effect of the Intervention Evaluation: Determining the Effect of the Intervention
Evaluation: Determining the Effect of the Intervention
 
6731 wk 4
6731 wk 46731 wk 4
6731 wk 4
 
Evaluation in Education
Evaluation in EducationEvaluation in Education
Evaluation in Education
 
Myp technology assessment critera
Myp technology assessment criteraMyp technology assessment critera
Myp technology assessment critera
 
Assessment criteria
Assessment criteriaAssessment criteria
Assessment criteria
 
Assignment 2 Fink Step 3Due Week 7 and worth 200 pointsFor .docx
Assignment 2 Fink Step 3Due Week 7 and worth 200 pointsFor .docxAssignment 2 Fink Step 3Due Week 7 and worth 200 pointsFor .docx
Assignment 2 Fink Step 3Due Week 7 and worth 200 pointsFor .docx
 
Assessment: Achieving improved efficiency, effectiveness, educational integri...
Assessment:Achieving improved efficiency, effectiveness, educational integri...Assessment:Achieving improved efficiency, effectiveness, educational integri...
Assessment: Achieving improved efficiency, effectiveness, educational integri...
 
AGU Evaluation Impact Workshop - December 2015
AGU Evaluation Impact Workshop - December 2015AGU Evaluation Impact Workshop - December 2015
AGU Evaluation Impact Workshop - December 2015
 
Assessment primer
Assessment primerAssessment primer
Assessment primer
 
Help faculty in Higher Education redesign courses for online learning
Help faculty in Higher Education redesign courses for online learningHelp faculty in Higher Education redesign courses for online learning
Help faculty in Higher Education redesign courses for online learning
 
Designing and Conducting Formative Evaluations
Designing and Conducting Formative EvaluationsDesigning and Conducting Formative Evaluations
Designing and Conducting Formative Evaluations
 
Assessment 072
Assessment 072Assessment 072
Assessment 072
 
Designing and conducting summative evaluations
Designing and conducting summative evaluationsDesigning and conducting summative evaluations
Designing and conducting summative evaluations
 
Coherence cas cop assess share
Coherence cas cop assess shareCoherence cas cop assess share
Coherence cas cop assess share
 
Apt 501 chapter_7
Apt 501 chapter_7Apt 501 chapter_7
Apt 501 chapter_7
 
Developing Assessment Instruments Chapter 7
Developing Assessment Instruments Chapter 7Developing Assessment Instruments Chapter 7
Developing Assessment Instruments Chapter 7
 
Developing Assessment Instrument
Developing Assessment InstrumentDeveloping Assessment Instrument
Developing Assessment Instrument
 
Page 1 of 5 Coursework Assignment Brief Semes.docx
Page 1 of 5  Coursework Assignment Brief   Semes.docxPage 1 of 5  Coursework Assignment Brief   Semes.docx
Page 1 of 5 Coursework Assignment Brief Semes.docx
 

More from Toño Medina (20)

Guidelines investigation
Guidelines investigationGuidelines investigation
Guidelines investigation
 
Teams nths
Teams nthsTeams nths
Teams nths
 
Teams dmk
Teams dmkTeams dmk
Teams dmk
 
Technology assessment criteria of 8th grade03
Technology assessment criteria of 8th grade03Technology assessment criteria of 8th grade03
Technology assessment criteria of 8th grade03
 
Teams nrw
Teams nrwTeams nrw
Teams nrw
 
Teams swtz
Teams swtzTeams swtz
Teams swtz
 
France teams01
France teams01France teams01
France teams01
 
Italy teams01
Italy teams01Italy teams01
Italy teams01
 
Technology assessment criteria of 7th grade02
Technology assessment criteria of 7th grade02Technology assessment criteria of 7th grade02
Technology assessment criteria of 7th grade02
 
Debanhi
DebanhiDebanhi
Debanhi
 
alicia
aliciaalicia
alicia
 
alondra
alondraalondra
alondra
 
alondra
alondraalondra
alondra
 
selene
seleneselene
selene
 
Andres
AndresAndres
Andres
 
gaby
gabygaby
gaby
 
eder
edereder
eder
 
Rosy
RosyRosy
Rosy
 
Dianakaren
DianakarenDianakaren
Dianakaren
 
cesar
cesarcesar
cesar
 

Technology assessment criteria of 9th grade03

  • 1. Technology assessment criteria of 9th grade Criteria 1 points 2 Points 3 points 4 points 5 Points 6 Points A: Investigate The student states the problem and investigates the problem. The student states the problem and investigates the problem, collecting information from sources and lists some specifications. The student describes the problem, mentioning its relevance and investigates the problem, selecting and analyzing information from some acknowledged sources. The student describes the problem, mentioning its relevance and investigates the problem, selecting and analyzing information from some acknowledged sources and describes a test to evaluate the product/solution against the design specification. The student explainsthe problem, discussing its relevance and critically investigates the problem, evaluating information from a broad range of appropriate, acknowledged sources and describes a test to evaluate the product/solution against the design specification. The student explainsthe problem, discussing its relevance and critically investigates the problem, evaluating information from a broad range of appropriate, acknowledged sources. The student describes detailed methods for appropriate testing to evaluate the product/solution against the design specification. B: Design The student generates one design, and makes some attempt to justify this against the design specification. The student generates a few designs, justifying the choice of one design and makes some attempt to justify this against the design specification. The student generates a few designs, justifying the choice of one design and fully evaluating this against the design specification. The student generates a range of feasible designs, justifying the choice of one design and justifies the chosen design and fully evaluating this against the design specification. The student generates a range of feasible designs, each evaluated against the design specification and justifies the chosen design and evaluatesit fully and critically against the design specification. The student generates a range of feasible designs, each evaluated against the design specification and justifies the chosen design and evaluates it fully and critically against the design specification. C: Plan The student produces a plan that contains some details of the steps and/or the resources required. The student produces a plan that contains a number of logical steps that include resources and time. The student produces a plan that contains a number of logical steps that include resources and time, and makes some attempt to evaluate the plan. The student produces a plan that contains a number of logical steps that describe the use of resources and time, and makes some attempt to evaluate the plan. The student produces a plan that contains a number of detailed, logical steps that describe the use of resources and time, evaluating the plan and justifies any modifications to the design. The student produces a plan that contains a number of detailed, logical steps that describe the use of resources and time. The student critically evaluates the plan and justifies any modifications to the design.
  • 2. Criteria 1 points 2 Points 3 points 4 points 5 Points 6 Points D: Create The student considers the plan and creates at least part of a product/solution. The student considers the plan and uses appropriate techniques and equipment to create a product/solution. The student uses appropriate techniques and equipment, and follows the plan and mentions any modifications made, resulting in a product/solution of good quality. The student competently uses appropriate techniques and equipment, and follows the plan and justifies any modifications made, resulting in a product/solution of good quality. The student competently uses appropriate techniques and equipment. The student follows the plan and justifies any modifications made, resulting in a product/solution of appropriate quality using the resources available. The student competently uses appropriate techniques and equipment. The student follows the plan and justifies any modifications made, resulting in a product/solution of appropriate quality using the resources available. E: Evaluate The student evaluates the product/solution or his or her own performance. The student makes some attempt to test the product/solution. The stude6nt evaluates the product/solution and his or her own performance. The student makes some attempt to test the product/solution. The student evaluates the product/solution and his or her own performance and suggests ways in which these could be improved, testing the product/solution to evaluate it against the design specification. The student evaluates the success of the product/solution in an objective manner based on the results of testing, providing an evaluation of his or her own performance, and provides an appropriate evaluation of the impact of the product/solution on life, society and/or the environment. The student evaluates product/solution in an objective manner based on the results of testing, and the views of the intended users, providing an evaluation of his or her own performance, and suggests improvements, providing an appropriate evaluation of the impact of the product/solution. The student evaluates the success of the product/solution in an objective manner based on the results of testing, and the views of the intended users, providing an evaluation of his or her own performance, and suggests improvements, providing an appropriate evaluation of the impact of the product/solution on life, society and/or the environment. F: Attitudes in Technology The student rarely displays a satisfactory standard in personal engagement (motivation, independence, general positive attitude) or in team work (attitudes towards safety, cooperation and respect for others). The student occasionally displays a satisfactory standard in personal engagement (motivation, independence, general positive attitude) or in team work (attitudes towards safety, cooperation and respect for others). The student sometimes displays a satisfactory standard in personal engagement (motivation, independence, general positive attitude) and in team work (attitudes towards safety, cooperation and respect for others). The student frequently displays a satisfactory standard in personal engagement (motivation, independence, general positive attitude) and in team work (attitudes towards safety, cooperation and respect for others). The student often displays a satisfactory standard in personal engagement (motivation, independence, general positive attitude) and in team work (attitudes towards safety, cooperation and respect for others). The student consistently displays a satisfactory standard in personal engagement (motivation, independence, general positive attitude) and in team work (attitudes towards safety, cooperation and respect for others). Average: