This document summarizes home therapy data from the UK Renal Registry (UKRR) and Key Performance Indicators (KQuIP) for the Oxford and Thames Valley region. It includes statistics on: - The percentage of dialysis patients by treatment modality (in-center hemodialysis, home hemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis) and center from 2011 to 2016. - The median age of dialysis patients by treatment modality and center from 2011 to 2016. - The percentage of dialysis patients by treatment modality, age, gender, ethnicity, social deprivation, and comorbidities for various centers in 2011 and 2016.

1. Home Therapies Data -
UKRR/KQuIP Regional Day – Oxford and
Thames Valley
Retha Steenkamp
Head of Operations UKRR

2. Percentage of prevalent dialysis patients by modality
and centre on 31 December 2011 and 2016
16.3 15.1 18.2
23.6
14.5 14.2 14.5
8.8
17.5 15.5 12.7 12.6
3.3
12.2 2.6
1.9
3.3 3.4 4.2 14.7
3.1 3.0 4.5 4.4
80.4
72.7
79.2
74.5
82.2 82.4 81.3
76.5 79.4 81.5 82.8 82.9
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
Percentageofpatients
ICHD
HHD
PD
2011 2016

3. Median age in prevalent dialysis patients by modality
and centre on 31 December 2011 and 2016
50
55
60
65
70
75
80
Gloucester
Gloucester
Northampton
Northampton
Oxford
Oxford
Reading
Reading
England
England
UK
UK
2011 2016 2015 2016 2011 2016 2011 2016 2011 2016 2011 2016
Medianage
Median ICHD
Median HHD
Median PD

4. Percentage of prevalent dialysis patients by
modality, age and gender on 31 December 2016
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Percentageofpatients
Male Female
ICHD
home-HD
PD

5. Percentage of prevalent dialysis patients by modality, age and
gender on 31 December 2016
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Percentageofpatients
Male Female
ICHD
home-HD
PD
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Percentageofpatients
Male Female
ICHD
home-HD
PD
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Percentageofpatients
Male Female
ICHD
home-HD
PD
0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
Percentageofpatients
Male Female
ICHD
home-HD
PD
Gloucester Northampton
Oxford Reading

6. Percentage of prevalent dialysis patients by modality,
ethnicity and centre on 31 December 2016
5.3
16.7 15.3 14.1
7.1
19.8
20.8
24.6
23.2
7.3
26.9
23.5
27.4
31.1
28.8
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Gloucester Northampton Oxford Reading England UK
Percentagenon-Whitepatients
ICHD
PD
HHD

7. Percentage of prevalent dialysis patients by modality, social
deprivation and centre in 2011 and 2016
0
20
40
60
80
100
HHD ICHD PD
Percentageofpatients
Dialysis modality
Gloucester – 31 December 2011
Quintile 1 (least deprived)
Quintile 2
Quintile 3
Quintile 4
Quintile 5 (most deprived)
0
20
40
60
80
100
HHD ICHD PD
Percentageofpatients
Dialysis modality
Gloucester – 31 December 2016
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
HHD ICHD PD
Percentageofpatients
Dialysis modality
Northampton - 31 December 2016
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
HHD ICHD PD
Percentageofpatients
Dialysis modality
Northampton - 31 December 2015
Quintile 1 (least deprived)
Quintile 2
Quintile 3
Quintile 4
Quintile 5 (most deprived)

8. Percentage of prevalent dialysis patients by modality, social
deprivation and centre in 2011 and 2016
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
HHD ICHD PD
Percentageofpatients
Dialysis modality
Oxford - 31 December 2011
Quintile 1 (least deprived)
Quintile 2
Quintile 3
Quintile 4
Quintile 5 (Most deprived)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
HHD ICHD PD
Percentageofpatients
Dialysis modality
Oxford - 31 December 2016
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
HHD ICHD PD
Percentageofpatients
Dialysis modality
Reading - 31 December 2016
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
HHD ICHD PD
Percentageofpatients
Dialysis modality
Reading - 31 December 2011
Quintile 1 (least deprived)
Quintile 1
Quintile 3
Quintile 4
Quintile 5 (most deprived)

9. Percentage of prevalent dialysis patients by modality
and comorbidity in Oxford, 2011 and 2016
41.9
66.768.4
44.4
33.327.8
13.6
3.8
45.9
66.766.3
43.2
33.3
22.5
10.911.2
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
ICHDHHDPDICHDHHDPD
Percentageofpatients
% ≥ 3 comorbs
% 1-2 comorbs
% No comorbs
2011 2016

10. Percentage of prevalent dialysis patients modality
and comorbidity in Reading, 2011 and 2016
34.5
62.5
54.5
47.5
25.0
36.4
17.018.019.0
35.6
100.0
48.8
43.2
37.5
21.2
13.8
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
ICHDHHDPDICHDHHDPD
Percentageofpatients
% ≥ 3 comorbs
% 1-2 comorbs
% No comorbs
20162011

11. Acknowledgements
Thank you to all renal units that submit data to the UKRR
Thank you also to all the people at the UKRR who work in the background to make all
this possible.