Americans understand your GOD GIVEN NATURAL RIGHTS AND WHAT Subject Matter Jurisdiction is. SMJ is everything and the UNITED STATE INC's game is - NOT TO ESTABLISH SMJ. Bottom line: They are filling jails as everything in America is about BUSINESS.

1. RELIEF IS
MANDATORY
WHEN THEY
VIOLATE
YOUR GOD
GIVE RIGHTS
PA R T 6 O F 1 0 R E F : S U B J E C T
M AT T E R J U R I S D I C T I O N I S
E V E R Y T H I N G I N T H E L E G A L
I N D U S T R Y. S O M E T H I N G T H E Y D O N ’ T
W A N T U S T O K N O W

2. When they violate your GOD given rights (18 USC 241) relief (1983 KKK/Charter
of the Forest) is mandatory.
As per the Charter of the Forest, they will make you whole as if they never
played you.
Sue everyone in their individual and official capacity. Everyone knows their
game. They [United States Inc] use manufactured evidence, jails and their
pawns to target the victims.
Relief is mandatory – Know your True worth and know who you are

5. Legal Process in America is no more than a stressful war of words, tricks, and
bullying [by our fake justice system, judges, attorneys, sheriff deputies, clerks,
criminals and the United States Inc PEDO Corporations] and everyone knows
it.
When they violate our GOD Given RIGHTS they cause a preventable health
issue, LEGAL ABUSE SYNDROME (LAS) which is a crime.
Once a human being is respected as the very reason for having a justice system in the
first place, Americans will start raising their frequency.

6. (1) Assemble Special Operations Task Force Team
(2) Knock down [courtroom] doors and find out who signed a
void orders then…
(3) Once found, apply 18 USC 1001 which states you either
did it or you didn’t do it. If you did it, you are a TRAITOR -
GITMO. Hold everyone accountable for their crime as per
their own corporate law.
Solution for preventing Legal Abuse Syndrome

7. Before going to the United States Inc Private
Court
understand the following

8. Before going to court understand the following
• Clearfield Doctrine (All courts are private organizations)
• 3 laws
• God’s law
• Common Law
• Corporate/Contract Law
• Courts have been infiltrated by evil [they do the opposite] pay attention to their tricks aka fraud upon the court /deception
• Jails, Prisons, Non- Profit Organizations, Drug and Alcohol, Elderly Homes, Universities, Medical Facilities are privately owned and
connected to the courts
• The Nazi’s developed Kangaroo Court therefore don’t establish Subject Matter Jurisdiction (SMJ)
• Attorneys, Prosecutors and Judges are testifying for the absent Plaintiffs/Defendants
• Doctors and Nurses are involved with their scam (See Marti Oakley’s 2019 Whistleblower presentation)
• The United States Inc., turn the Whistleblower into Criminals using manufactured documents (Sheriff’s police reports, void o rders, fake
police reports, criminal charges, Patriot Act, medical a trick
• The Statue of Limitation NEVER runs out if you are violated by the system. Sue everyone in their individual and official cap acity

9. Nothing is higher than GOD’s Natural Law.
• Common law. Contract Law was designed by Sir Edward Cooke to trick Americans out of giving up
their rights.
• Contract Law. Everything in America is about business even justice. They abide by
Corporate/Contract Law. Know what contract law states (e.g. void orders, tricks, subornation of
perjury and etc)
• Charter of the Forest. Know the Charter of the Forest = The 1871 KKK and 1983 KKK Act which
means once a human being is violated by another human being, a fair trial vs KKK Kangaroo Court
is required. Relief is Mandatory. BLUF: the Defendant will make the victim whole

11. Regarding Justice
Everyone is equal under the law. To trick you [Americans], they
[United States Inc corporations] make us [Americans] think we are
not equal by calling us out of our name (e.g., Black).
Black means dead. They give the majority indigenous people no flag. Therefore,
you have no nation. This means you cannot sue them in their twisted mind (see
the Japanese and how the Japanese sued the United States Inc for putting them
in camps because they had a flag)

13. They make everyone not equal
They play administrative trickery
and don’t show up in court using
manufactured data in violation of 18
USC 1506
Everything is fraud upon the court
as they don’t establish SMJ
If you don’t show up in court, you
lose. They will use a manufactured
warrant and arrest you and put you
in their real jails. They will also use
your medical records against you.
You can play, but you cannot get
caught
Understanding their tricks regarding Maxim
of Law/Justice

14. Justice in the United States Inc
all comes down to
Corporate Law

15. Courts have always been corporations. When our fake founding fathers came to a land that was
not lost they started using Sir Edward Cooke’s model without permission. Hence the reason the
indigenous people lost their land and the constitution does not reflect the will of the people (See
Jefferson’s and Washington’s comments page 21 – residential schools May 2022)

18. They play a game in court which nobody know
except the rich, but it comes down to corporate
law

19. Courts are private organizations
as per the Clearfield Doctrine

21. Understand Contract law

23. If any thing they do to you
is unlawful, it is void
Never consent as they will
make you sign something
with your consent
Any legal proceeding with
restraint/protest – void
Don’t have an attorney talk
for you. He will agree to
put you away. Speak for
yourself or get someone
you trust to speak for you.
What the Law of Contract Act means to you

24. Back up slides

25. 1983 KKK is the 1871 KKK Act designed by
the devil (Sir Edward Cooke)
What is the opposite of the 1983 KKK and
1871 KKK Act???
Charter of the Forest
Note: The NAZI’s Designed Kangaroo Court

29. Understand the Westfall Act which states once
they fake government violates your GOD give
rights (18 USC 241) then other fake government
employees cannot touch your case

30. Sir Edward Cooke [was evil]. He stated the
following about Subject Matter Jurisdiction.

31. Lack of Judicial Immunity
Thus, neither Judges nor Government attorneys are above
the law. See United States v. Isaacs, 493 F. 2d 1124, 1143 (7th
Cir. 1974).
In our judicial system, few more serious threats to individual
liberty can be imagined than a corrupt judge or judges
acting in collusion outside of their judicial authority with
the Executive Branch to deprive a citizen of his rights.

32. Subject Matter Jurisdiction
When a Court has (a) jurisdiction of the cause, and proceeds inverso ordine
or erroneously, there the party who sues, or the officer or minister of the
Court who executes the precept or process of the Court, no action lies
against them. But (b) when the Court has not jurisdiction of the cause, there
the whole proceeding is [before a person who is not a judge], and actions will
lie against them without any regard of the precept or process . . . Id. 77 Eng.
Rep. at 1038-41.

33. A majority of states including Michigan have followed the English rule to
find that a judge had no immunity from suit for acts outside of his judicial
capacity or jurisdiction. Robert Craig Waters, ‘Liability of Judicial Officers
under Section 1983’ 79 Yale L. J. (December 1969), pp. 326-27 and 29-
30).
Right to sue a Judge

34. Right to sue a Judge
Also as early as 1806, in the United States there were recognized restrictions
on the power judges, as well as the placing of liability on judges for acts
outside of their jurisdiction.
In Wise v. Withers, 7 U.S. (3 Cranch) 331 (1806), the Supreme Court
confirmed the right to sue a judge for exercising authority beyond the
jurisdiction authorized by statute.

35. Right to sue a Judge
In Stump v. Sparkman, 435 U.S. 349 at 360 (1978), the Supreme Court
confirmed that a judge would be immune from suit only if he did not act
outside of his judicial capacity and/or was not performing any act expressly
prohibited by statute. See Block, Stump v Sparkman and the History of
Judicial Immunity, 4980 Duke L.J. 879 (l980).

36. Right to sue a Judge
It is clear that a judge who acts in the absence of subject matter jurisdiction
may be held liable for his judicial act. Stump v. Sparkman, 435 U.S. 349, 98
S. Ct. 1099, 55 L. Ed. 2d 331 (1978) and Bradley v. Fisher, 80 U.S. (13 Wall.)
335, 20 L. Ed. 646 (1872).

37. Right to sue a Judge
Judicial immunity may only extend to all judicial acts within the court’s jurisdiction
and judicial capacity, but it does not extend to either criminal acts, or acts outside of
official capacity or in the ‘clear absence of all jurisdiction.’ see Stump v. Sparkman
435 U.S. 349 (1978).
When a judge knows that he/she lacks jurisdiction, or acts in the face of clearly
valid Constitutional provisions or valid statutes expressly depriving him/her of
jurisdiction or judicial capacity, judicial immunity is lost.” Rankin v. Howard 633 F.2d
844 (1980), Den Zeller v. Rankin, 101 S.Ct. 2020 (1981).

38. Right to sue a Judge
• As stated by the United States Supreme Court in Piper v. Pearson, 2 Gray
120, cited in Bradley v. Fisher, 13 Wall. 335, 20 L.Ed. 646 (1872), ‘[w]here
there is no jurisdiction, there can be no discretion, for discretion is incident
to jurisdiction.’

39. When they violate your GOD given rights (18
USC 241) relief is mandatory. Sue everyone in
their individual and official capacity.

41. Change Civil
Rights to Human
Rights which
means nobody is
allowed to violate

42. A valid CONSTITUTION is supposed to reflect GOD’s
Natural Law
In order for any CONSTITUITON or TREATY to be
legal it must reflect
the will of the majority of the people.
The United States Inc Constitution, has never
included the will of the majority of the people.
Therefore, it is void. See contract law.

43. History of our FAKE Government

48. Note: Our fake founding fathers,
never found a land because it was
NOT lost

49. Thanksgiving means the opposite of what
they teach us. Go down that rabbit hole and
tell me what you find.

51. The Doctrine of Discovery signed by the Pedo POPE is void
as hell as it violates GOD’s Natural Law and their contract
law.
Nobody is higher than GOD’s Natural Law

56. In the name of religion?

61. The secret history is: We were already here in
America! Surprise

70. Washington and Jefferson said they had to trick the
indigenous Americans in order to steal their land

71. The United States Inc Presidents (Washington and
Jefferson) said the cheapest way to steal the land
was to subdue the Indians

80. The United States Inc Black Codes 1724 signed
by the King is void too

111. They even tried to steal Hawaii using a fake constitution which did not reflect the
will of the majority of the people. They apologized to the Hawaiians in 1993.
When are they going to apologized to the Indigenous Americans?

116. They are running a scam on
Americans. They think we are
stupid and would listen to anything
they tell us

117. Black means dead

120. Voting is consenting to their scam

122. Deep State Universities

135. Children just don’t come up missing after visiting the Queen

136. 100 percent of the kids in these schools were raped? Their
parents lost their benefits and or put in jail if they did not comply
with sending their children to these United States Inc PEDO
Schools?

137. Smallpox blankets issued to everyone except the 1
percent

149. The United States Inc’s laws are
not really laws, their “laws” are
rules for their UNITED STATES INC
corporations

155. Ref: 42 USC 1986
Once leaders know about their crimes
against humanity and do nothing, you are
either going through a sting operation or the
leaders are corrupt as hell. I say sting
operation.

156. Ref: All leaders who knew about our corrupt criminal court coordinated by the white hats of VA
Attorneys in Building 810 in 2019. We knew what ever we were going through was a sting as top
leaders are not going to let this crime happen. Top leaders aren’t going to go to jail for criminals as
per 42 USC 1986.

157. Note: You will never win in their corrupt court system as everything is a rich
man’s trick. Once they violate your GOD given natural rights, they have no
rights. You must go outside of the system and ask DOD or the ICC to do their
job.
BLUF: We were told we won in 2019. However, they kept our court case opened
which means we continued to play Kangaroo Court and expose the criminals.
BLUF: They cannot dismiss our case because of 1983 KKK/Charter of the
Forest, Title II and Title III of the 1990 ADA Act. There is only one law, GOD’s
Law. Know your worth and the game they are playing. Nothing they say is valid.
Their goal is to get into your head and change your reality to their reality.

158. They make up laws they don’t follow to trick
you and make you dig deeper for the truth.
The United States Inc constitution are not
really laws but rules for their corporation.
They use contract law

161. The 14th Amendment is not for slaves but based on corporation law. Sending
Americans to prison is their business.
This is what they do to our people in their for-profit prisons and you don’t know
about it. They do the opposite as their goal is oppress, separate and lower our
frequency. ¾ of our people in jail should not be in their prisons. Think about it. It’s
2022 and they are still experimenting on our people, children and elderly???

164. Their laws are not really laws but rules for their United
States Inc corporation

165. 18 USC 1001, 18 USC 241,18 USC 242, 245, 249 seek
relief 42 USC 1983, 42 USC 1985, 42 USC1986

166. 18 USC 1001
You either did it or you didn’t do it. If you
did it, you are going to prison for 5
years.

169. Example: Lance Vs. GrayRemove that yellow flag
from our soldier’s patch
ADA Advocates [ADA
interference]
Worker Comp, Form 95, VA Benefits, Workers Comp, Social, EOC
Security,
This means nobody can violate your GOD GIVEN RIGHTS

170. 18 USC 241,
Conspiracy against
Rights

172. 18 USC 242, Deprivation of
rights

173. Right to
Sue – Form
95
(Individual
and Official
Capacity

174. 18 USC 245,
Federally Protected
Activity

176. 18 USC 246

178. 18 USC 249, Hate
Crimes

179. ADA Advocate
2016 on phone
then 2018
discriminate
Kangaroo Court
using medical
records.
Robert – ordering
him back to work
2 (18 Jun and 31
March) with the
intent to harm/kill

180. ADA Interference

181. ADA
Interference
Robert’s question to
Voncelle ref: Why did
you tell me NO ref: I
can not work on MLK
day is it because I am
white?
Protected- No FEAR
Policy
ADA
Executive Order 13164

182. 42 USC 1983, 42 USC
1985, 42 USC 1986

183. 42 USC 1983

186. 42 USC 1985

188. 42 USC 1986

190. Oath of Office

192. Federal Income Tax Law

198. • THAT The practice of Law authority higher than the authority of the State; that there is a moral law
which the State is powerless to alter; that the individual possesses rights, conferred by the
Creator, which government must respect. The Declaration of Independence (and the Charter of
the Forest) stated the now familiar theme: ‘We hold these Truths to be self-evident, that all Men
and WOMEN are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable
Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness.’ And the body of the
Constitution, as well as the Bill of Rights, [should] enshrined those principles.” (McGowan v.
Maryland, 366 US 420, 563, Supreme Court (1961).
• As per the Charter of FOREST, NO MAN IS ABOVE GOD’s LAW. No man can violate another
man/woman’s rights. Your rights are your property. Should another man/woman harm another
man/woman – They will have a fair trial and the defendants make the defendant whole as if they
never harmed them emotional, physically emotionally and etc.

199. • THAT "All acts of legislature apparently contrary to natural right and justice are, in our laws
and must be like things, considered as void.
• The laws of nature are the laws of God; whose authority can be superseded by no power on
earth. A legislature must not obstruct our obedience to him from whose punishments they
cannot protect us.
• All human constitutions which contradict GOD’s NATURAL laws, we are in conscience bound
to disobey. Such has been the adjudications of our courts of justice." (Robin v. Hardaway, 1
Jefferson 109, 114 (1772)

200. All human constitutions which contradict GOD’s
NATURAL laws, we are in conscience bound to
disobey. Such has been the adjudications of our
courts of justice." (Robin v. Hardaway, 1 Jefferson
109, 114 (1772)

201. • The Supreme Court has warned, "Because of what appear to be Lawful
commands on the surface, many citizens, because of their respect for
what appears to be law, are cunningly coerced into waiving their
rights, due to ignorance [and deceptive practices in inferior
administrative State courts]." (United States v. Minker, 350 U.S. 179,
187, 76 S.Ct. 281, 100 L.Ed. 185 (1956)
HOW THEY THINK:
If you [AMERICAN] don’t know your GOD GIVEN RIGHTS, YOU DON’T
HAVE ANY GOD GIVEN RIGHTS

202. The General Misconception among the Americans. The United States Inc’s
corporation laws are not really laws but rules for their corporation.
• The general misconception among the public being that any exercise of state regulatory or
police power bearing the appearance of law is in fact in agreement with the law of the land,
and is, therefore, legitimate in its operation as imposed. A statute is not a "Law," (Flournoy v.
First Nat. Bank of Shreveport, 197 La. 1067, 3 So.2d 244, 248), a concurrent or joint
resolution of legislature is not "a law," (Koenig v. Flynn, 258 N.Y. 292, 179 N.E. 705, 707;
Ward v. State, 176 Okl. 368, 56 P.2d 136, 137; State ex rel. Todd v. Yelle, 7 Wash.2d 443, 110
P.2d 162, 165),

203. A United States Inc Statute is not really a law.
• A statute is not a "Law," (Flournoy v. First Nat. Bank of Shreveport, 197 La. 1067, 3 So.2d 244,
248), a concurrent or joint resolution of legislature is not "a law," (Koenig v. Flynn, 258 N.Y. 292,
179 N.E. 705, 707; Ward v. State, 176 Okl. 368, 56 P.2d 136, 137; State ex rel. Todd v. Yelle, 7
Wash.2d 443, 110 P.2d 162, 165),

204. • The United States Constitution does not give anyone the right to a lawyer or the right to
counsel, or the right to any other "hearsay substitute." The 6th Amendment is very specific
that the accused only has the right to the “assistance of counsel” and this assistance of
counsel can be anyone the accused chooses without limitations. "The term [liberty] ...
denotes not merely mean freedom from bodily restraint but also the right of the individual to
contract, to engage in any of the common occupations of life, to acquire useful knowledge, to
marry, to establish a home and bring up children, to worship God according to the dictates of
this own conscience... The established doctrine is that this liberty may not be interfered with,
under the guise of protecting public interest, by legislative action (Meyer v. Nebraska, 262
U.S. 390, 399, 400).
You don’t really need one of their corrupt attorneys to help you in court as
they are on their side

205. • A State cannot exclude a person from the practice of law or from any other occupation in a
manner or for reasons that contravene the Due Process Clause (Schware v. Board of Bar
Examiners, 353 U.S. 232). The practice of law is an occupation of common right (Sims v.
Aherns, 271 SW 720 (1925). Therefore there can be no sanction or penalty imposed upon on
because of his exercise of Constitutional Rights (Sherar v. Cullen, 481 F. 2d 946 (1973).

206. • Litigants can be assisted by unlicensed laymen during judicial proceedings (Trainmen v.
Virginia ex rel. Virgin ia State Bar, 377 U.S. 1; v. Wainwright, 372 U.S. 335

207. • Argersinger v. Hamlin, Sheriff 407 U.S. 425). Members of groups who are competent non-
lawyers can assist other members of the group to achieve the goals of the group in court
without being charged with "unauthorized practice of law (NAACP v. Button, 371 U.S. 415);
United Mineworkers of America v. Gibbs, 383 U.S. 715; and Johnson v. Avery, 89 S. Ct. 747
(1969). A next friend is a person who represents someone who is unable to tend to his or her
own interest (Federal Rules of Civil Procedures, Rule 17, 28 USC A "Next Friend”).
Members of groups who are competent non-lawyers can assist other members of
the group to achieve the goals of the group in court without being charged with
"unauthorized practice of law

208. • The Supreme Court in Tennessee v. Lane, et al., 541 U.S. 59 (2004) pointed out that Congress
Constitutionally abrogated the States’ Eleventh Amendment immunity, making suits for damages
available to individuals who proceed under Title II of the ADA with claims of violation of Due
Process of Law (Huffer, 2012). This means that if judges do not adhere to the ADAAA, they lose
their immunity from being sued. The Lane case found that “Congress enacted Title II against a
backdrop or pervasive unequal treatment of persons with disabilities in the administration of state
services and programs, including systematic deprivation of fundamental rights (Huffer, 2012).
Specifically, Title II seeks to enforce a variety of basic Constitutional guarantees, including the
right of access to the courts, infringements of which are subject to heightened judicial scrutiny.
The court found that all courts have a duty to accommodate that is perfectly consistent with the
well-established due process principle that a state must afford to all individual a meaningful
opportunity to be heard in its courts. The Supreme Court concluded in Lane, ‘that Title II, as it
applies to the class of cases implicating the fundamental right of access to the courts, constitutes
a valid exercise of Congress’ authority to enforce the guarantees of the Fourteenth Amendment
(Huffer, 2012).
Judges, Attorneys, Sheriff’s Deputy and Court Clerks, lose
Immunity from being sued when they ignore the ADAAA

209. The constitutional (GOD GIVEN
RIGHTS) requirement of due
process of the law is indispensable

210. The constitutional requirement of due process of
the law is indispensable:
• The constitutional requirement of due process of the law is
indispensable:
• “A judgment can be void . . . where the court acts in a manner
contrary to due process.” Am Jur 2d, §29 Void Judgments, p. 404.
• “Where a court failed to observe safeguards, it amounts to denial of
due process of law, court is deprived of juris.” —Merritt v. Hunter,
C.A. Kansas 170 F2d 739.
• “Moreover, all proceedings founded on the void judgment are
themselves regarded as invalid.” Olson v. Leith 71 Wyo. 316, 257
P.2d 342.).

211. The Law of Void Judgments and Decisions Supreme
Court Decisions on Void Orders
• The Law of Void Judgments and Decisions
Supreme Court Decisions on Void Orders

212. Supreme Court Decision on
Void Orders
• A judgment may not be rendered in violation of constitutional protections. The validity of a
judgment may be affected by a failure to give the constitutionally required due process notice and
an opportunity to be heard. Earle v. McVeigh, 91 US 503, 23 L Ed 398. See also Restatements,
Judgments ' 4(b). Prather vLoyd, 86 Idaho 45, 382 P2d 910.

213. Supreme Court Decision on
Void Orders
• The limitations inherent in the requirements of due process and equal protection of the law
extend to judicial as well as political branches of government, so that a judgment may not be
rendered in violation of those constitutional limitations and guarantees. Hanson v Denckla, 357 US
235, 2 L Ed 2d 1283, 78 S Ct 1228.

214. Supreme Court Decision on
Void Orders
• A void judgment is not entitled to the respect accorded a valid adjudication, but may be
entirely disregarded, or declared inoperative by any tribunal in which effect is sought to be given to
it. It is attended by none of the consequences of a valid adjudication. It has no legal or binding
force or efficacy for any purpose or at any place. ... It is not entitled to enforcement ... All
proceedings founded on the void judgment are themselves regarded as invalid. 30A Am Jur
Judgments '' 44, 45.

215. Supreme Court Decision on
Void Orders
• No Opportunity to Be Heard
A judgment of a court without hearing the party or giving him an opportunity to be heard is
not a judicial determination of his rights. Sabariego v Maverick, 124 US 261, 31 L Ed 430, 8 S
Ct 461, and is not entitled to respect in any other tribunal.

216. Supreme Court Decision on
Void Orders
• "A void judgment does not create any binding obligation. Federal decisions addressing void state
court judgments include Kalb v. Feuerstein (1940) 308 US 433, 60 S Ct 343, 84 L ed 370; Ex parte
Rowland (1882) 104 U.S. 604, 26 L.Ed. 861:
"A judgment which is void upon its face, and which requires only an inspection of the
judgment roll to demonstrate its wants of vitality is a dead limb upon the judicial tree, which
should be lopped off, if the power to do so exists." People v. Greene, 71 Cal. 100 [16 Pac. 197,
5 Am. St. Rep. 448]. "If a court grants relief, which under the circumstances it hasn't any authority
to grant, its judgment is to that extent void." (1Freeman on Judgments, 120c.) An illegal order is
forever void.

217. Supreme Court Decision on
Void Orders
• "A judgment which is void upon its face, and which requires only an inspection of the
judgment roll to demonstrate its wants of vitality is a dead limb upon the judicial tree, which
should be lopped off, if the power to do so exists." People v. Greene, 71 Cal. 100 [16 Pac. 197,
5 Am. St. Rep. 448]. "If a court grants relief, which under the circumstances it hasn't any authority
to grant, its judgment is to that extent void." (1Freeman on Judgments, 120c.) An illegal order is
forever void.

219. Pleadings shall be so construed
as to do substantial justice"... "
• (2) Conley v. Gibson, 355 U.S. 41 at 48 (1957). "Following the simple guide of Rule 8(f) that all
pleadings shall be so construed as to do substantial justice"... "The federal rules reject the
approach that pleading is a game of skill in which one misstep by counsel may be decisive to the
outcome and accept the principle that the purpose of leading is to facilitate a proper decision on
the merits."